DOCSLIB.ORG

European Parliament 2014-2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Parliament 2014-2019 European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on International Trade INTA_PV(2015)1022_1 MINUTES Meeting of 22 October 2015, 09:00-12:30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 09:10 on Thursday, 22 October 2015, with Bernd Lange (Chair) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda INTA_OJ (2015)1022_1 The draft agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Chair's announcements 3. State of play of ongoing trilogue negotiations INTA/8/02083 Exchange of views 4. Annual Report 2014 on the Protection of the EU's Financial Interests - Fight against fraud INTA/8/03641 2015/2128(INI) Rapporteur Sander Loones (ECR) PA – PE567.824v01-00 for the opinion: Responsible: CONT – Benedek Jávor (Verts/ALE) Consideration of draft opinion Speakers: Sander Loones, Jarosław Wałęsa, Joachim Schuster, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Eleonora Forenza, Bernd Lange, Tiziana Beghin, Edouard Ferrand, Ska Keller, Michael Mcalinden (European Commission). PV\1077376EN.doc PE571.479v01-00 EN United in diversity EN 5. Implementation and review of the EU-Central Asia Strategy INTA/8/04359 2015/2220(INI) Rapporteur David Borrelli (EFDD) for the opinion: Responsible: AFET – Tamás Meszerics (Verts/ALE) Exchange of views Speakers: David Borrelli, Maria Arena, Sander Loones, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Ska Keller, Edouard Ferrand, Balazs Kiss (European Commission). 6. Transparency, accountability and integrity in the EU institutions INTA/8/04692 2015/2041(INI) Rapporteur Bernd Lange (S&D) for the opinion: Responsible: AFCO – Sven Giegold (Verts/ALE) Consideration of draft opinion Speakers: Bernd Lange, Marietje Schaake, Helmut Scholz, Ska Keller, David Borrelli, Edouard Ferrand, Jude Kirton-Darling, Sven Giegold, Jean-Charles Van Eeckhaute (European Commission). 7. Arrangements for products originating in certain states which are part of the ACP Group of States provided for in agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, Economic Partnership Agreements (recast) INTA/8/03680 ***I 2015/0128(COD) COM(2015)0282 – C8-0154/2015 Rapporteur: Jarosław Wałęsa (PPE) Responsible: INTA Opinions: DEVE – Decision: no opinion JURI – – Heidi Hautala (Verts/ALE) CM – PE565.159v01-00 Exchange of views Speakers: Jarosław Wałęsa, Maria Arena, Eleonora Forenza, Remco Vahl (European Commission). PE571.479v01-00 2/12 PV\1077376EN.doc EN 8. European Investment Bank (EIB) - Annual Report 2014 INTA/8/03638 2015/2127(INI) Rapporteur Yannick Jadot (Verts/ALE) PA – PE567.827v01-00 for the opinion: Responsible: CONT – Georgi Pirinski (S&D) Consideration of draft opinion Speakers: Yannick Jadot, Jude Kirton-Darling, Marietje Schaake, William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández, Helmut Scholz. 9. Monitoring Groups Activities INTA/8/01441 Exchange of views Speakers: Bernd Lange, Alessia Maria Mosca, Jan Zahradil. 10. Any other business 22 October 2015, 11.30 – 12.30 (in camera) 11. Coordinators’ meeting Coordinators' decisions and recommendations: 11.1. Chair’s announcements: 11.1.1. Speaking time during Committee meetings: to be reminded of the rules for allocation of speaking time. 11.1.2. Gender mainstreaming questionnaire Decision: to invite political groups to send their comments to the Gender Mainstreaming questionnaire by 27 October 2015. 11.1.3 Exchange of views with high-level representatives of international organisations to invite the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, Ms Christine Lagarde, for an exchange of views with the INTA Committee 12. Legal issues 12.1. Consideration of letter on behalf of INTA to JURI Decision: to send a letter to JURI, which reflects INTA's position on the pending case of the PV\1077376EN.doc 3/12 PE571.479v01-00 EN Court of Justice regarding the EU competence to sign and ratify the Free Trade Agreement with Singapore, to agree on the exact wording by written procedure based on the draft provided by the INTA Chairman. 13. Appointment of rapporteurs - decision on procedure REPORTS 13.1. Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products, processed agricultural products, fish and fishery products and amending the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part INTA/8/04497 *** 2015/0203(NLE) COM(2015)0446 Responsible: INTA Opinions: AGRI PECH – – Peter van Dalen (ECR) Decision: to attribute the report to the Standing Rapporteur for Maghreb (Ms Marielle de Sarnez, ALDE), for 0 point in accordance with INTA general principles for Monitoring Groups. 13.2. Introduction of emergency autonomous trade measures for the Republic of Tunisia INTA/8/04516 ***I 2015/0218(COD) COM(2015)0460 – C8-0273/2015 Responsible: INTA Opinions: AGRI Decision: to attribute the report to the Standing Rapporteur for Maghreb (Ms Marielle de Sarnez, ALDE), for 0 point in accordance with INTA general principles for Monitoring Groups. 13.3. A new Sustainable Impact Assessment methodology fitting the new challenges of EU trade policy 2015/0000(INI) Responsible: INTA Decision: to confirm the restitution of 2 points paid by the Greens/ALE linked to the above- mentioned report. 14. Appointment of rapporteurs – decision on procedure COMITOLOGY/REGULATORY PROCEDURE WITH SCRUTINY/DELEGATED ACTS PE571.479v01-00 4/12 PV\1077376EN.doc EN 14.1. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) …/... amending Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1233/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of certain guidelines in the field of officially supported export credits INTA/8/04576 2015/2866(DEA) C(2015)06568 Responsible: INTA Decision: to request to extend the deadline for objection to the above-mentioned delegated act by 2 months; to hold a debate at one of the future INTA Committee on the management of export credits. 15. Motions for resolutions (Rule 133) 15.1. Motion for a resolution on support for olive oil production in Italy B8-0884/2015 Decision: to take note of the proposed motion for resolution in the on-going work on the Introduction of emergency autonomous trade measures for the Republic of Tunisia (2015/0218(COD)), and in line with Rule 133(3) to inform the authors of the decision of the committee. 15.2. Motion for a resolution on the EU-Vietnam Agreement prejudicial to Italian rice B8-0881/2015 Decision: to take note of the proposed motion for resolution in its on-going work, bearing in mind that the negotiations for a EU-Vietnam DCFTA are reaching their final stage, and in particular to refer this issue to the INTA Monitoring Group for Vietnam, and in line with Rule 133(3) to inform the author of the decision of INTA. 15.3. Motion for a resolution on the volatility of the financial markets and the weakness of global trade B8-0912/2015 Decision: to take note of the proposed motion for resolution in its work related to the INTA INI, New Forward-Looking and Innovative Future Strategy on Trade and Investment and in line with Rule 133(3) to inform the authors of the decision of the committee. 15.4. Motion for a resolution on the parallel exportation of medicines B8-0903/2015 Decision: to take note of this motion of resolution, but to take no action as it falls under the competence of the Committee on Internal Market. PV\1077376EN.doc 5/12 PE571.479v01-00 EN 15.5. Motion for a resolution on excluding the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) B8-0904/2015 Decision: to take note of the proposed motion for resolution in the on-going work on TTIP and not take any further specific action, and in line with Rule 133(3) to inform the authors of the decision of the committee. 15.6. Motion for a resolution on fall in euro area GDP predicted by ECB B8-0908/2015 Decision: to take note of the proposed motion for resolution in its work related to the INTA INI, New Forward-Looking and Innovative Future Strategy on Trade and Investment and in line with Rule 133(3) to inform the authors of the decision of the committee. 15.7. Motion for a resolution on support for the pig industry in France B8-0935/2015 Decision: to take note of the proposed motion for resolution in the on-going work of INTA and not take any further specific action, and in line with Rule 133(3) to inform the authors of the decision of the committee. 15.8. Motion for a resolution on the abandonment of emergency autonomous trade measures for the Republic of Tunisia B8-0982/2015 Decision: To take note of the proposed motion for resolution in the on-going work on the Introduction of emergency autonomous trade measures for the Republic of Tunisia (2015/0218(COD)), and in line with Rule 133(3) to inform the authors of the decision of the committee. 16. Hearings, Workshops & Studies Decisions: to request an internal note by the Policy Department with the aim to up-date of the study "PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE" finalised on 25 October 2012; to endorse for the 1st semester of 2016 the following workshops: o EU-Turkey trade relations o Implementation of trade policy rules via customs policy (including the role of EU ports in achieving EU trade policy goals) round-tables o Future Trade Strategy: tailoring support for European SMEs going abroad PE571.479v01-00 6/12 PV\1077376EN.doc EN and studies: o Comparative study on EU services offers, TTIP and TISA o A comparative study of EU and EFTA states' ability to launch and conclude FTAs and their impact on jobs, growth and ease of doing business o EU-Mexico upgrade of trade relations o EU-Chile upgrade of trade relations o Trade in the EU global strategy o Organised criminal networks and illicit international trade o Financial services and EU PTAs o FTAs: real impact of standards and regulations o Critical assessment of the new guidelines for trade IAs and SIAs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Benefits of Europe
    Local Benefits of Europe 1 European Green Party Rue Wiertz 31, 1050 Brussels – Belgium [email protected] Funded by the European Parliament. Sole liability remains with the author. Printed in Brussels, Belgium on recycled paper Designed by Mijuro © 2018 DEAR FRIENDS European politics have a signifi cant Evelyne Huytebroeck influence on the lives of people at the (Member of the EGP Committee) local level. In many EU Member States, the local elections are held simulta- neously with the European elections providing a huge opportunity to link the two election campaigns. Against this background, we would like to provide you with some practical background material and answer your questions on how European decisions in various policy areas influence your municipality by means of this booklet ‘Local Benefi ts of Europe’. This booklet is based on a work that was done by the German Greens lead by Anna Cavazzini and Reinhard Bütikofer. The information can also help you prepare for your local election programmes or campaigns. We place particular emphasis on how the people in your community benefi t practically from Europe, ranging from (Secretary General EGP) environmental protection to structural Mar Garcia policy, and what the Greens in Europe have achieved for European communi- ties. If you need more information on a spe- cifi c topic - no problem: in each chapter, you will fi nd a contact person who has contributed to this handbook and can answer your questions. We hope that this handbook will help you to prepare for the upcoming Euro- pean and local elections. Best regards 1. How do cities and municipalities benefi t from Europe? 5 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, to the Attention of Members of the European Parliament Who
    CATHERINE ASHTQN ANDRIS PIEBALGS HIGH REPRESENTATIVE MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION VICE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT Brussels, A(2013)3540142-3819594 To the attention of Members of the European Parliament who signed the letter of 20 November Dear Colleagues, Thank you for your letter of 20 November addressed to both of us as well as to Commissioners Georgieva and De Gucht concerning land acquisitions in Colombia. Land issues axe obviously one of the key dimensions of the decade-old internal conflict in Colombia and therefore deserve close attention on the part of the EU. This is the reason why the EU has been devoting considerable financial resources to funding projects aimed at helping displaced people, at facilitating their return and reintegration and at supporting people at risk in the framework of the land restitution process. Moreover, the EU is also directly contributing to the implementation of the law on victims and land restitution through a project funded in the framework of the instrument for stability. At political level, the issues related to the implementation of the law are also discussed regularly in the framework of the various dialogue fora between the EU and Colombia, including the EU-Coiombia Dialogue on Human Rights. The EU is also engaged in exchanges with the Colombian authorities about mining and natural resources, which have an obvious relation with land use and occupation issues. The EU is hopeful that the current negotiations between the FARC and the Colombian authorities should, if they are successful, contribute to reducing tensions about land in Colombia. We have also been informed that the Colombian institute for Rural Development (INCODER), in charge of the formalisation of land titles, has launched a number of enquiries into a number of cases of alleged undue accumulation of agricultural family units (IJAF), including in the region to which your correspondence refers.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Xm Xm Amendments
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Constitutional Affairs 2016/2114(REG) 27.9.2016 AMENDMENTS 1079 - 1283 Draft report Richard Corbett (PE585.606v02-00) General Revision of Parliament's Rules of Procedure (2016/2114(REG)) Document 1: AM 863-1078 (PE 589.403) Document 2: AM 1079-1283 (PE 589.433) AM\1105232XM.docx PE589.433v01-00 XM United in diversity XM AM_Com_RulesReport PE589.433v01-00 2/114 AM\1105232XM.docx XM Amendment 1079 João Ferreira Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 150 – paragraph 2 Present text Amendment 2. Os pontos inscritos no projeto 2. Os pontos inscritos no projeto definitivo de ordem do dia para votação definitivo de ordem do dia para votação sem alterações também não serão objeto de sem alterações também não serão objeto de debate, a menos que o Parlamento, ao debate, a menos que o Parlamento, ao aprovar a sua ordem do dia no início de um aprovar a sua ordem do dia no início de um período de sessões, decida em contrário período de sessões, decida em contrário sob proposta da Conferência dos sob proposta da Conferência dos Presidentes, ou a pedido de um grupo Presidentes, ou a pedido de um grupo político ou de um mínimo de 40 deputados. político ou de um mínimo de 25 deputados. Or. pt Amendment 1080 João Ferreira Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 150 – paragraph 3 Present text Amendment 3. Aquando da elaboração do projeto 3. Aquando da elaboração do projeto definitivo de ordem do dia de um período definitivo de ordem do dia de um período de sessões, a Conferência dos Presidentes de sessões, a Conferência dos Presidentes poderá propor que sejam inscritos outros poderá propor que sejam inscritos outros pontos sem alterações ou sem debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz
    Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz Wojciechowski Commissioner for Agriculture European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Brussels, 11 November 2020 Subject: Deforestation and illegal logging of Romania’s primary forests Dear Commissioners, we, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament, are addressing you to express our deep concerns about massive violations of the protection of Natura 2000 areas, primary and ancient forests and UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Romania. In Romania, deforestation caused by illegal logging is continuing on an alarming scale. It threatens the last and irreplaceable primary forests in the EU, which are more crucial than ever in the fight against climate change and for the preservation of biodiversity. According to expert estimates, up to two thirds of the EU’s remaining primary forests are located in Romania. Largely untouched areas in the Romanian Carpathian Mountains and the Făgăraș Mountains have survived until today – a European if not global heritage of invaluable ecological value. Some of these forests are also included in the List of World Heritage Sites UNESCO.1 Now, ruthless greed and large-scale corruption are seriously endangering these European natural treasures and the time for protective measures is running out. If no immediate action is taken, the still existing forests will soon be lost forever. Since the launch of the European Commission’s infringement procedure against Romania on 12 February 2020 for failing to establish effective measures against illegal logging2, thousands more hectares were destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • European Alliance for a Green Recovery
    Launch of the European alliance for a Green Recovery Press Release Under embargo until 14/04 7:00am At the initiative of Pascal Canfin, Chair of the Environment Committee at the European Parliament, 180 political decision-makers, business leaders, trade unions, NGOs, and think tanks have come together to form a European alliance for a Green Recovery. In the face of the coronavirus crisis, the biggest challenge Europe has faced in peacetime, with devastating consequences and a shock to the economy tougher than the 2008 crisis, Ministers from 11 countries, 79 cross-party MEPs from 17 Member States, 37 CEOs, 28 business associations representing 10 different sectors, trade union confederation representing members from 90 national trade union organisations and 10 trade union federations, 7 NGOs and 6 think tanks, have committed to working together to create, support and implement solutions to prepare our economies for the world of tomorrow. This first pan-European call for mobilisation on post-crisis green investment packages will work to build the recovery and transformation plans which enshrine the fight against climate change and biodiversity as a key pillar of the economic strategy. Sharing the belief that the economic recovery will only come with massive investments to protect and create jobs and to support all companies, regions and sectors that have suffered from the economy coming to a sudden halt, the alliance commits to contribute to the post-crisis investment decisions needed to reboot and reboost our economy. Covid-19 will not make climate change and nature degradation go away. The fight against this crisis will not be won without a solid economic response.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to EU Telecom and Trade Ministers and to European Commissioners Thierry Breton, Margrethe Vestager and Valdis Dombrovskis
    Letter to EU telecom and trade ministers and to European Commissioners Thierry Breton, Margrethe Vestager and Valdis Dombrovskis We, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament from five different political groups, share a common concern regarding 5G security in Europe and unfair competition between European and Chinese 5G vendors. Therefore, we send this letter to you in preparation of the upcoming informal TTE Council on 15 October, urging you to take action on the points raised. We have learnt from the COVID-19 crisis that maintaining know-how, capacity and some level of independence in critical sectors, including medical/pharmaceutical, food supplies, and utilities, i.e. energy, water and communications infrastructure is indispensable for our survival. In the area of connectivity, COVID-19 has demonstrated how vital fixed and mobile connectivity is to help fight the crisis and to keep the economy and essential services running to the extent possible. The European Commission has, already pre-crisis, launched a number of initiatives to preserve our security and sovereignty, which today prove to be more relevant than ever before. These include a renewed industrial strategy with digitization and connectivity at its heart, increased funding proposals for connectivity, cyber security and AI, the investment screening framework to avoid harmful foreign take-overs of critical EU businesses, trade policy initiatives promoting reciprocity, and more concretely, the 5G security joint risk assessment and toolbox of mitigating measures. 5G is a central element in Europe’s digital sovereignty and the EU 5G security initiative rightly has the aim of safeguarding the security of 5G as a critical infrastructure for Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Federation of Young European Greens
    Federation of Young European Greens GEF Workshop “Social consequences of the crisis – analysis and proposals” Combating Youth unemployment: the youth guarantee Terry Reintke, FYEG Co-Spokesperson “Young people argue with their parents, cross their legs, and chat when they should be working” Socrates, 2,500 years ago. Youth unemployment 5.520 million young persons (under 25) in EU 27 3.493 million in the Euro area. → 22,8% in the EU27 and 23.3% in the euroarea. Spain= 54,2% and Greece= 55.6% (highest numbers worldwide) Eurostat October 2012 Working? • In Catalonia, average wage for young people is 702€/month • 44% of young Spaniards have a job under their skills/education level • Germany: problems with precarisation of labour market, especially for young people Lack of participation ● Economic crisis also crisis of legitimacy ● Give young people more decision-making power ● One concrete proposal: Lowering of voting age to 16 years Analysis and proposals ● Main fields where action is needed: → Education (free education, strengthening apprenticeships, exchange programmes [Erasmus] more inclusive) → Social Europe (Youth Guarantee, directing more money to social measures in MFF) → Democratic reforms (institutional reforms, new EU convention including young people, fighting populism) → Free movement (real freedom of movement within EU, portability of social services) Solutions in a nutshell ● Introduction of a Youth guarantee ● Revision of the EU budget ● Lowering voting age, more youth participation ● Green initiatives ● Call for tackling the crisis: www.youthincrisis.eu → initiated by Ska Keller, Maria Petinaki, Vesna Jusup, Markus Drake, Delfina Rossi and Terry Reintke ● Youth in crisis conference in the European Parliament, 10th April 2013, FYEG + Reinhard Bütikofer, Raul Romeva..
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 18Th September 2020 UNESCO Intergovernmental
    Brussels, 18th September 2020 UNESCO Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Place de Fontenoy 7 75007 Paris FRANCE Subject: Opposition to the classification of Bullfighting as Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding Dear Director-General of UNESCO, Ms. Audrey Azoulay, It came to our attention that an application to consider bullfighting as part of UNESCO’s Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding was submitted by the International Tauromaquia (Bullfighting) Association on 7 June 2020. In accordance with the provisions of the 2003 Convention, the application will most likely be discussed by the Bureau of the Intergovernmental Committee at its meeting in October this year. We recognize and fully support UNESCO’s vital mission of seeking to build peace through international cooperation in Education, the Sciences and Culture. Nevertheless, just like expressed in UNESCO’s mandate, we also agree that peace must be built upon the intellectual and moral solidarity of humanity. It is our view that intellectual and moral solidary of humanity necessarily encompasses solidarity towards all living beings. Bullfighting is an activity that depicts and glorifies abuse, violence and cruelty towards animals for the sake of the entertainment of a limited number of individuals around the globe. In addition to the brutality experienced by the animals involved, bullfighting also has serious mental repercussions on those of young age that are habituated to witness it and, consequently, not educated with the desirable ideals of peace and kindness towards all living beings. This way, from our perspective, bullfighting has no place in UNESCO’s Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding.
    [Show full text]
  • Greens/EFA Group - Distribution of Seats in EP Parliamentary Committees
    Seats in Committees Update 04.02.2021 Greens/EFA group - Distribution of Seats in EP Parliamentary Committees Parliamentary Committees Seats FULL Members SUBSTITUTE Members Foreign Affairs (AFET) Marketa GREGOROVÁ Alviina ALAMETSÄ Pierrette HERZBERGER- Reinhard BÜTIKOFER FOFANA Viola VON CRAMON Sergey LAGODINSKY 7 Jordi SOLE Katrin LANGENSIEPEN Tineke STRIK Hannah NEUMANN Thomas WAITZ Mounir SATOURI Salima YENBOU Ernest URTASUN Agriculture (AGRI) Claude GRUFFAT Benoit BITEAU 5 Anna DEPARNAY- Francisco GUERREIRO GRUNENBERG Martin HÄUSLING Pär HOLMGREN Bronis ROPĖ Tilly METZ Sarah WIENER Thomas WAITZ Budgets (BUDG) Rasmus ANDRESEN Damien BOESELAGER 4 David CORMAND Henrike HAHN Alexandra GEESE Monika VANA Francisco GUERREIRO Vacant Culture & Education (CULT) Romeo FRANZ Marcel KOLAJA 3 Niklas NIENASS Diana RIBA Salima YENBOU Vacant Development (DEVE) Pierrette HERZBERGER- Alviina ALAMETSÄ FOFANA Benoit BITEAU 3 Erik MARQUARDT Caroline ROOSE Michelle RIVASI Economic & Monetary Affairs Sven GIEGOLD Damien CARÊME (ECON) Claude GRUFFAT Karima DELLI Stasys JAKELIŪNAS Bas EICKHOUT 7 Philippe LAMBERTS Henrike HAHN Kira PETER-HANSEN Ville NIINISTÖ Ernest URTASUN Mikulas PEKSA Piernicola PEDICINI Vacant Committee seats - UPDATE 30.9.20 Employment & Social Affairs Kira PETER-HANSEN Romeo FRANZ 4 (EMPL) Katrin LANGENSIEPEN Terry REINTKE Mounir SATOURI Kim VAN SPARRENTAK Tatjana ŽDANOKA Sara MATTHIEU Environment, Public Health & Margarete AUKEN Michael BLOSS Food safety (ENVI) Bas EICKHOUT Manuela RIPA Pär HOLMGREN Sven GIEGOLD Yannick JADOT Martin HÄUSLING
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Shadow of Ordoliberalism: Germany's Approach to the Euro Crisis
    brief policy The long shadow of ordoliberalism: germany’s approach To The euro crisis sebastian dullien and ulrike guérot At the end of January, European leaders agreed the wording SUMMARY The new treaty agreed by European leaders of the new treaty aimed primarily at tightening fiscal policy in in January reflects Germany’s distinctive the euro area that was agreed in principle by 26 EU heads of approach to the euro crisis rather than collective government at last December’s European summit. The treaty compromise. Much to the frustration of many reflects German positions rather than collective compromise. other eurozone countries, Germany has imposed In particular, the treaty centres on a “fiscal compact” that its own approach – centred on austerity and price stability at the expense of economic growth compels all eurozone countries to incorporate into their – on others without considering whether the constitutions a deficit limit modelled on the German institutional flaws of monetary union beyond a Schuldenbremse, or “debt brake”. In addition, European lack of fiscal control may be the cause of some leaders once again ruled out the possibility of using European of the distortions and problems that the current Central Bank (ECB) funds to “leverage” the European euro crisis has exposed or whether its approach Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) or European Stability could have a negative impact on other eurozone Mechanism (ESM), and there was no mention of ECB bond countries. German economic orthodoxy has been widely criticised elsewhere in Europe. purchases to help stabilise bond markets. This brief explores the historical and ideological However, although the new treaty reflects views that are foundations of German economic thinking supported by a broad consensus in Germany (strict opposition and discusses how it differs from mainstream to ECB intervention and a one-sided focus on fiscal austerity), international economic discourse.
    [Show full text]