DOCSLIB.ORG

Executive Summary Heun, J.C., De Groen, M.M., Werner, M., March 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STORM Report Series No. 7 Simulation Tool for River Management STORM - Rhine Main Report Design of the Roleplay March 2002 STORM Report Series No. 7 Simulation Tool for River Management STORM - Rhine Main report Design of the Roleplay March 2002 The STORM project is sponsored by: IRMA-SPONGE: Roleplay for transboundary river management (Project number: 3/NL/1/164/ 99 15 183 01) Delft Cluster: Ontwikkeling rollenspelen integraal waterbeheer (Project number: 06.01.06) The STORM projects are carried out in partnership by: International Institute for Infrastructure, Hydraulics and Environment P.O.Box 3015; 2601 DA Delft; The Netherlands Contact: J.C.Heun, +31-15-2151835, [email protected] Contact: T.D.Schotanus, +31-15-2151853, [email protected] Resource Analysis Zuiderstraat 110; 2611 SJ Delft; The Netherlands Contact: M.M.de Groen, +31-15-2191526, [email protected] WL | Delft Hydraulics P.O.Box 177; 2600 MH Delft; The Netherlands Contact: M. Werner, +31-15-2858807; [email protected] STORM Report Series: 1. STORM – BETUWE, Final Report, Design of the Roleplay Schmidt, A.L., October 1998 2. STORM – BETUWE, User Manual, Design of the Roleplay Schmidt, A.L., October 1998 3. STORM – DELTA, Definitiestudie: demonstratiemodel voor Rivierinrichting Schmidt, A.L., December 1998 4. STORM – DELTA, Main Report, Design of the Model De Graaff, B.J., December 1999 5. STORM – DELTA Main Report, User Manual De Graaff, B.J., December 1999 6. STORM – RHINE, Main Report, Executive Summary Heun, J.C., De Groen, M.M., Werner, M., March 2002 7. STORM – RHINE, Main Report, Design of the Roleplay Heun, J.C., De Groen, M.M., Werner, M., Schotanus, T.D.; March 2002 7A. STORM – RHINE, Main Report, Annex A, Documentation on Models on Water Werner, M., March 2002 8. STORM – RHINE, Main Report, User Manual Schotanus, T.D., Versteeg, A., July 2002 9. STORM – RHINE Supporting Document 1: Dutch-German Water Management of the River Rhine, MSc. thesis Bijman, S., January 2002 10. STORM – RHINE Supporting Document 2: Deciding about Safety; Flood Protection & Decision-Making Processes in Germany at the local level; M.Sc.thesis Leene, T.A., August 2002 IRMA project number: 3/NL/1/164/ 99 15 183 01 The IRMA-SPONGE Umbrella Program In recent years, several developments have contributed not only to an increased public interest in flood risk management issues, but also to a greater awareness of the need for improved knowledge supporting flood risk management. Important factors are: • Recent flooding events and the subsequently developed national action plans. • Socio-economic developments such as the increasing urbanisation of flood-prone areas. • Increased awareness of ecological and socio-economic effects of measures along rivers. • Increased likelihood of future changes in flood risks due to land use and climate changes. The study leading to this report aimed to fill one of the identified knowledge gaps with respect to flood risk management, and was therefore incorporated in the IRMA-SPONGE Umbrella Program. This program is financed partly by the European INTERREG Rhine-Meuse Activities (IRMA), and managed by the Netherlands Centre for River Studies (NCR). It is the largest and most comprehensive effort of its kind in Europe, bringing together more than 30 European scientific and management organisations in 13 scientific projects researching a wide range of flood risk management issues along the Rivers Rhine and Meuse. The main aim of IRMA-SPONGE is defined as: “The development of methodologies and tools to assess the impact of flood risk reduction measures and scenarios. This to support the spatial planning process in establishing alternative strategies for an optimal realisation of the hydraulic, economical and ecological functions of the Rhine and Meuse River Basins." A further important objective is to promote transboundary co-operation in flood risk management. Specific fields of interest are: • Flood risk assessment. • Efficiency of flood risk reduction measures. • Sustainable flood risk management. • Public participation in flood management issues. More detailed information on the IRMA-SPONGE Umbrella Program can be found on our website: www.irma-sponge.org. We would like to thank the authors of this report for their contribution to the program, and sincerely hope that the information presented here will help the reader to contribute to further developments in sustainable flood risk management. Ad van Os and Aljosja Hooijer (NCR Secretary and IRMA-SPONGE project manager) Report Title: STORM-Rhine Main Report – Design of the Roleplay Contact person : J.C. Heun Date : March 2002 J.C. Heun (IHE) M.M. de Groen (Resource Analysis) Author(s) : M. Werner (Delft Hydraulics) T.D. Schotanus (IHE) Development of roleplays integrated water DC Project name : management DC Project number : 06.01.06 DC Working Group Theme : Integrated water management DC Theme leaders : E. van Beek, H.H.G. Savenije Report Number : STORM report series no. 7 Number of pages : 64 Number of tables : 32 Number of figures : 21 Keverling Buismanweg 4 Postbus 69 2600 AB Delft 015-2693793 015-2693799 [email protected] www.delftcluster.nl Delft Cluster verricht lange-termijn fundamenteel strategisch onderzoek op het gebied van duurzame inrichting van deltagebieden. STORM-Rhine, Main Report - Design of the Roleplay Page i Table of Contents 1 THE STORM PROJECTS 1 1.1 Objectives of the Projects 1 1.2 Objectives of STORM 1 1.3 The STORM Products 1 1.4 Making Use of STORM 2 1.5 Roleplay Setting 2 1.6 STORM Projects Implementation 3 2 THE REPORT 5 3 SCOPE OF STORM-RHINE 7 3.1 The Concept 7 3.2 Scale of the Simulation 7 3.3 River and Floodplain Functions 8 3.4 River and Floodplain management 9 3.5 The Models 9 3.6 The Roles 10 3.7 The Interface 10 4 RIVER MANAGEMENT 11 4.1 Introduction 11 4.2 Interventions in the Main Channel 11 4.3 Interventions in the Floodplain 12 4.4 Summary 13 5 MODELS ON HYDROLOGY 15 5.1 Introduction 15 5.2 Hydrology of the Rhine basin 15 5.3 Extent of the Rhine Basin considered 16 5.4 Modelling Approach 18 5.5 Hydrological Computations 19 5.6 Hydraulic Computations 20 5.7 Morphological Computations 22 5.8 Measures 22 5.9 Hydrological Routing Computations 25 5.10 Hydraulic Computations Upstream 27 5.11 Scenarios 28 6 MODEL ON SHIPPING 31 6.1 Introduction 31 6.2 Objective 31 6.3 Assumptions 32 6.4 Input 33 6.5 Model 34 6.5.1 Relation between water depth and ship load 34 6.5.2 Frequency distribution of normative water depths 36 6.5.3 Frequency distribution of ship loads 38 6.6 Output 42 6.6.1 Introduction 42 6.6.2 Economic effects 42 6.6.3 Environmental effects 44 6.7 Discussion and synthesis 45 6.8 Information on Role 46 7 PRESENT and TARGET LAND COVER 47 7.1 Introduction 47 7.2 General 47 7.3 The Netherlands 47 STORM-Rhine, Main Report - Design of the Roleplay Page ii 7.4 North Rhine Westphalia 48 7.5 Rhineland Palatinate and hessen 49 7.6 Germany Target Distribution 50 7.7 Recommendations 51 7.8 Test of matrix approach 52 8 FLOOD DAMAGE MODULE 55 9 INSTITUTIONS 57 9.1 Water Management in Germany 57 9.2 Water Management in The Netherlands 58 9.3 Institutional Complexity of Inter-departmental Interaction 59 9.4 Comparison between German and Dutch Water Management 59 9.5 Application in the Roleplay 60 REFERENCES 63 ANNEX A MODELS on WATER LIST of TABLES Table 3.1 River and floodplain functions 8 Table 3.2 River and floodplain management measures 9 Table 3.3 Modules of the STORM-Rhine system model 9 Table 5.1 Cumulative chainage and catchment area of the Rhine ... 16 Table 5.2 Physical maximum and highest measured discharge 17 Table 5.3 Tributaries explicitly modelled 18 Table 5.4 Overview of branches considered in the model 18 Table 5.5 Geometrical properties of schematised cross sections 21 Table 5.6 Measures acting on geometry and hydraulic roughness 22 Table 5.7 Projected retention areas between Maxau and Lobith 23 Table 5.8 Projected retention downstream of Lobith 24 Table 5.9 Retention basins considered in the STORM-Rhine 24 Table 5.10 Nodes and branches of the routing model 25 Table 5.11 Comparison of observed and routed maximum discharges 27 Table 5.12 Overview of branches and approximate locations 27 Table 5.13 Estimates of climate change for the Rhine basin 29 Table 5.14 Discharges at different tributaries for selected scenarios 30 Table 5.15 Peak discharges at different locations for selected scenarios 30 Table 6.1 Representative sizes of ship classes 33 Table 6.2 Input information for changes in fleet 33 Table 6.3 Ship masses 35 Table 6.4 Number of journeys from ships from different ship classes ....... 43 Table 7.1 Translation of GIS map of NRW to ecotope distribution in STORM 48 Table 7.2 Translation of Gewässerstrukturgütekartiering of Rhineland Paptinate 50 Table 7.3 Matrix to transform current ecotope distribution to target ecotope 51 Table 8.1 Unit flood damages 55 Table 8.2 Areas and land use classes of damage 55 Table 9.1 Water resources management framework in Germany 57 Table 9.2 Water resources management framework in The Netherlands 58 Table 9.3 Water quantity management 59 Table 9.4 River, floodplains and facilities management 60 Table 9.5 Roles in STORM-Rhine 60 LIST of FIGURES Figure 3.1 Elements of a simulation game 7 Figure 3.2 Linkages between players 7 STORM-Rhine, Main Report - Design of the Roleplay Page iii Figure 3.3 Reach covered by STORM-Rhine 7 Figure 3.4 Relation between modules and system models 9 Figure 3.5 Compilation of elements from STORM-Rhine interfaces 10 Figure 4.1 Structural measures in the river and floodplain 11 Figure 5.1 The Rhine basin 16 Figure 5.2 Relation between the computational modules 19 Figure 5.3 Example of effect on discharge peaks 20 Figure 5.4 Illustration of link between hydrologic and hydraulic computations 21 Figure 5.5 Schematic cross section used in hydraulic computations 22 Figure 5.6 Structure of the hydrological routing model 25 Figure 5.7 Comparison between Muskingum routing model end SOBEK 26 Figure 6.1 Model results (Eq.
Recommended publications
  • Upper Rhine Valley: a Migration Crossroads of Middle European Oaks

    Upper Rhine Valley: a Migration Crossroads of Middle European Oaks

    Upper Rhine Valley: A migration crossroads of middle European oaks Authors: Charalambos Neophytou & Hans-Gerhard Michiels Authors’ affiliation: Forest Research Institute (FVA) Baden-Württemberg Wonnhaldestr. 4 79100 Freiburg Germany Author for correspondence: Charalambos Neophytou Postal address: Forest Research Institute (FVA) Baden-Württemberg Wonnhaldestr. 4 79100 Freiburg Germany Telephone number: +49 761 4018184 Fax number: +49 761 4018333 E-mail address: [email protected] Short running head: Upper Rhine oak phylogeography 1 ABSTRACT 2 The indigenous oak species (Quercus spp.) of the Upper Rhine Valley have migrated to their 3 current distribution range in the area after the transition to the Holocene interglacial. Since 4 post-glacial recolonization, they have been subjected to ecological changes and human 5 impact. By using chloroplast microsatellite markers (cpSSRs), we provide detailed 6 phylogeographic information and we address the contribution of natural and human-related 7 factors to the current pattern of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) variation. 626 individual trees 8 from 86 oak stands including all three indigenous oak species of the region were sampled. In 9 order to verify the refugial origin, reference samples from refugial areas and DNA samples 10 from previous studies with known cpDNA haplotypes (chlorotypes) were used. Chlorotypes 11 belonging to three different maternal lineages, corresponding to the three main glacial 12 refugia, were found in the area. These were spatially structured and highly introgressed 13 among species, reflecting past hybridization which involved all three indigenous oak species. 14 Site condition heterogeneity was found among groups of populations which differed in 15 terms of cpDNA variation. This suggests that different biogeographic subregions within the 16 Upper Rhine Valley were colonized during separate post-glacial migration waves.
  • 5 Day Historic Cities of Rhine and Mosel

    5 Day Historic Cities of Rhine and Mosel

    5 Day Historic Cities of Rhine and Mosel 5 Days/4 Nights - departs daily from/to Frankfurt Int. Airport The scenic Upper Rhine Valley - a UNESCO World Heritage Site, is just an hour west of Frankfurt Int. Airport. Visit beautiful historic cities along the Rhine and Mosel River: Rudesheim am Rhein, Koblenz and Trier! Day 1 – Frankfurt Int. 5 Days / 4 Nights Airport to Koblenz Daily buffet breakfast Rail from Frankfurt Int. Taxi transfer to your Airport to Koblenz, free time hotel in Wiesbaden for sightseeing in Koblenz, Accommodation in Koblenz Includes all Rail tickets (includes buffet breakfast) needed (also back to Frankfurt Int. Airport)! Day 2 – Day Trip to Trier Cable Car ride in Rudesheim Rail to Trier, free time for All Day Rhine River sightseeing in Trier (e.g. Cruise Porta Nigra, Trier Cathedral, Roman Imperial Throne Room (Konstantin-Basilika) ) Rail back to Koblenz , Accommodation in Koblenz (includes buffet breakfast) Day 3 – Rudesheim Rail from Koblenz to Rudesheim am Rhein, cable car ride up to Niederwald recreational area and back to Rudesheim, free time for sightseeing in Rudesheim am Rhein, Accommodation in Rudesheim am Rhein (includes buffet breakfast) Photos: © Thomas H. Giesick, © Diana Schulz, © Dennis Jarvis; ©Onnola ©Onnola Jarvis; Dennis © Schulz, Diana © Giesick, H. Thomas © Photos: 5 Day Historic Cities of Rhine and Mosel Day 4 – Rhine River Cruise Day 5 – Frankfurt Int. Airport (All Day) Rhine River Cruise aboard a ship Rail from Rudesheim am Rhein to of the “Weisse Flotte” (White Fleet) Frankfurt Int. Airport where your tour operated by the largest Day-Cruise ends company - the “KD”, Koln-Dusseldorfer - from Rudesheim am Rhein thru the very scenic and romantic Upper Rhine-valley - a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
  • Annual Progress Report EU

    Annual Progress Report EU

    Council Annual Progress Report on Actions taken under the CNL(21)36 Implementation Plan for the Calendar Year 2020 – EU – Germany Annual Progress Report on Actions taken under the Implementation Plan for the Calendar Year 2020 The Annual Progress Reports allow NASCO to evaluate progress on actions taken by Parties / jurisdictions to implement its internationally agreed Resolutions, Agreements and Guidelines and, consequently, the achievement of their objectives and actions taken in accordance with the Convention. The following information should be provided through the Annual Progress Reports: • any changes to the management regime for salmon and consequent changes to the Implementation Plan; • actions that have been taken under the Implementation Plan in the previous year; • significant changes to the status of stocks, and a report on catches; and • actions taken in accordance with the provisions of the Convention. In completing this Annual Progress Report please refer to the Guidelines for the Preparation and Evaluation of NASCO Implementation Plans and for Reporting on Progress, CNL(18)49. These reports will be reviewed by the Council. Please complete this form and return it to the Secretariat no later than 1 April 2021. Party: European Union Jurisdiction / Region: Germany 1: Changes to the Implementation Plan 1.1 Describe any proposed revisions to the Implementation Plan (Where changes are proposed, the revised Implementation Plans should be submitted to the Secretariat by 1 November). The response to question 4.3 (a)(i) will be revised in accordance with the recommendations of the NASCO IP Review Group and submitted to the Secretariat on time. 1.2 Describe any major new initiatives or achievements for salmon conservation and management that you wish to highlight.
  • 7.9 Biological Water Quality Classification (2000)

    7.9 Biological Water Quality Classification (2000)

    7.9 Biological Water Quality Classifi cation (2000) The water courses in the mostly densely populated landscapes of Germany are subject to more or less intensive human use. This includes water abstraction for industries, small businesses, agriculture and public water supply and also the discharge of treated waste water. Waste water discharge is generally a point source of pollution and may have different impacts according to the discharge volume in relation to the river‘s runoff and the effectiveness of sewage treat- ment. Other impacts are from diffuse sources such as drainage from agricultural land or from livestock. The biological water quality chart of the LAWA (“saprobe chart”) describes the pollution affect- ing the oxygen balance of the water courses. It is essentially caused by carbon and nitrogen oxidation of easily bio-degradable sewage constituents. Methodology The basis of the method is the biological water analysis based on the saprobe system (DIN 38 410). The method of the LAWA for the indication and assessment of biological water quality is only applicable in flowing water courses, streams and rivers of Central Europe, and not in still waters. It is easily applicable, on the basis of uniform guidelines, for most water courses. There may be problems in the assessment of water courses which do not continuously flow, in very slow-flowing and barrier-regulated waters, in acidified waters or waters devastated by toxic substances, and in canals without adequate bank structure. Stretches of this kind are assigned a special symbol in the quality chart. If, in such cases, biological analysis is not possible, or Fig.
  • The Present Status of the River Rhine with Special Emphasis on Fisheries Development

    The Present Status of the River Rhine with Special Emphasis on Fisheries Development

    121 THE PRESENT STATUS OF THE RIVER RHINE WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT T. Brenner 1 A.D. Buijse2 M. Lauff3 J.F. Luquet4 E. Staub5 1 Ministry of Environment and Forestry Rheinland-Pfalz, P.O. Box 3160, D-55021 Mainz, Germany 2 Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment RIZA, P.O. Box 17, NL 8200 AA Lelystad, The Netherlands 3 Administrations des Eaux et Forets, Boite Postale 2513, L 1025 Luxembourg 4 Conseil Supérieur de la Peche, 23, Rue des Garennes, F 57155 Marly, France 5 Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape, CH 3003 Bern, Switzerland ABSTRACT The Rhine basin (1 320 km, 225 000 km2) is shared by nine countries (Switzerland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Austria, Germany, France, Luxemburg, Belgium and the Netherlands) with a population of about 54 million people and provides drinking water to 20 million of them. The Rhine is navigable from the North Sea up to Basel in Switzerland Key words: Rhine, restoration, aquatic biodiversity, fish and is one of the most important international migration waterways in the world. 122 The present status of the river Rhine Floodplains were reclaimed as early as the and groundwater protection. Possibilities for the Middle Ages and in the eighteenth and nineteenth cen- restoration of the River Rhine are limited by the multi- tury the channel of the Rhine had been subjected to purpose use of the river for shipping, hydropower, drastic changes to improve navigation as well as the drinking water and agriculture. Further recovery is discharge of water, ice and sediment. From 1945 until hampered by the numerous hydropower stations that the early 1970s water pollution due to domestic and interfere with downstream fish migration, the poor industrial wastewater increased dramatically.
  • No Frontiers for the Rhine ICBR Inventory 2004 in the Rhine River Basin

    No Frontiers for the Rhine ICBR Inventory 2004 in the Rhine River Basin

    IKSR CIPR No frontiers for the Rhine ICBR Inventory 2004 in the Rhine river basin Co-ordinating Committee RHINE INVENTORY ALONG THE RHINE CHANCES OFFERED BY AN EU DIRECTIVE the European Union aim at water Reduce pollution protection at a high level, no matter, whether groundwater, The status of waters may not dete- rivers, lakes or coastal waters are riorate under any circumstances. concerned. The EU Member States must take appropriate measures to improve waters which are expected to The target probably not meet the environ- is the good status mental objectives by 2015. All uses must be taken into account By 2015, rivers, lakes, coastal which directly or indirectly affect waters and groundwater are to the state of waters, no matter Photo: Stanko Petek, www.luftbild.com The Falls of the Rhine at Schaffhausen have reached a good status. The whether industry, navigation, the reference is the natural state of use of hydroelectric power or water bodies with their variety of agriculture is concerned. A central In 2004, a large scale inventory of plants and animals, an unaltered task in the Rhine river basin will be form and water regime and the to reduce polluting agents and to the Rhine and the waters in its natural quality of surface waters keep dangerous substances away catchment was concluded. Nine and groundwater. Distinctions are from waters. Apart from that the states were involved in this work made between: to which the European Water - the good ecological and chemical status for surface Framework Directive had given waters (rivers, lakes, transitional rise. This directive modernises and and coastal waters).

  • Sustainable Visits Professional Visitors Experience Sustainability

    Sustainable Visits Professional Visitors Experience Sustainability www.upperrhinevalley.com CONTENT France’s charm, Switzerland’s cordiality, and Germany’s romance – those who visit the Upper Rhine Valley will find themselves in the most beautiful parts of these three countries� Mobility�������������������������������������������������������������������������05 WORKSHOP: Multimodal Transportation ���������������������06 ArchitectureandCityPlanning������������������������������������07 WORKSHOP: Sustainable Urban Development ������������08 WORKSHOP: Building with Energy Standards �������������08 Energy�������������������������������������������������������������������������09 WORKSHOP: Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency ������������������������������������������������������������10 WasteManagement�����������������������������������������������������11 WORKSHOP: 3 Countries, 3 Solutions in Waste Management �������������������������������������������������������12 NatureandtheEnvironment���������������������������������������13 WORKSHOP: Focusing on Environmental Education ����14 OrganicAgriculture�����������������������������������������������������15 WORKSHOP: Production, Distribution and Marketing of Organic Food ��������������������������������������������16 WaterManagement�����������������������������������������������������17 WORKSHOP: Potable Water, Flood Retention Systems and more ���������������������������������������������������������18 InnovationAcademy�����������������������������������������������������19 BlackForestandSouthernPalatinate������������������������23
  • Flüsse in NRW Wasserstraßen Durchs Land

    Flüsse in NRW Wasserstraßen Durchs Land

    Flüsse in NRW Wasserstraßen durchs Land Die Reihe "Alle Augen Auf..." lenkt dieses Mal den Fokus auf Flüsse in Nordrhein-Westfalen und beantwortet unter anderem folgende Fragen: Hat die Weser eigentlich eine Quelle? Woher kommt der Name "Ruhr"? Und ist der Rhein wirklich der längste Fluss in NRW? Menschen aus Nordrhein-Westfalen erzählen interessante, unterhaltende und spannende Geschichten über "ihren" Fluss. Lippe - 220 km Wer hat's gewusst? Nicht der Rhein, sondern die Lippe ist der längste Fluss in Nordrhein-Westfalen! Die Quelle entspringt in Bad Lippspringe, fließt dann auf 220 Kilometern durch NRW, bis sie sich bei Wesel mit dem Rhein vereint. Die Entstehung des Flusses umgibt eine Sage: Der nordische Gott Odin soll ein Auge geopfert haben, um dem trockenen Gebiet am Fuße des Teutoburger Waldes Leben zu schenken. Odins Auge - so wird die Quelle der Lippe deswegen auch genannt. Schon die Römer zog es an die Lippe und sie nutzten das Wasser, um ihre Güter zu transportieren. Und so ist die Römerroute entlang der Lippe eine weitere Besonderheit. Lange Zeit war die Wasserqualität der Lippe eher mäßig. In den 60er Jahren wurde daher künstlicher Sauerstoff in den Fluß gepumpt. Eine reichlich aufwändige Sache und nur von kurzem Erfolg. Langfristig heißt das Zauberwort "Renaturierung". Das bedeutet konkret: das Wasser zu säubern und den Fluss wieder mit seinen natürlichen Auen zu umgeben. Pate : Ulrich Detering arbeitet in Lippstadt als Wasserbauingenieur. Obwohl er gebürtig von der Weser kommt, ist er ein leidenschaftlicher Lippstädter und liebt das "Venedig Westfalens". Weitere Informationen : www.roemerlipperoute.de www.eglv.de/lippeverband/lippe Ruhr - 219 km Der 219,3 Kilometer lange Fluss ist namensgebend für eine ganze Region: das Ruhrgebiet.
  • Rapid Attribution of Heavy Rainfall Events Leading to the Severe Flooding in Western Europe During July 2021

    Rapid Attribution of Heavy Rainfall Events Leading to the Severe Flooding in Western Europe During July 2021

    Rapid attribution of heavy rainfall events leading to the severe flooding in Western Europe during July 2021 Contributors Frank Kreienkamp1, Sjoukje Y. Philip2, Jordis S. Tradowsky1,4, Sarah F. Kew2, Philip Lorenz1, Julie Arrighi7,8,9, Alexandre Belleflamme16, Thomas Bettmann18, Steven Caluwaerts13,19, Steven C. Chan14, Andrew Ciavarella22, Lesley De Cruz13, Hylke de Vries2, Norbert Demuth18, Andrew Ferrone17, Erich M. Fischer6, Hayley J. Fowler14, Klaus Goergen16, Dorothy Heinrich7, Yvonne Henrichs18, Geert Lenderink2, Frank Kaspar10, Enno Nilson15, Friederike E L Otto11, Francesco Ragone13,20, Sonia I. Seneviratne6, Roop K. Singh7, Amalie Skålevåg, Piet Termonia13,19, Lisa Thalheimer11, Maarten van Aalst7,8,21, Joris Van den Bergh13, Hans Van de Vyver13, Stéphane Vannitsem13, Geert Jan van Oldenborgh2,3, Bert Van Schaeybroeck13, Robert Vautard5, Demi Vonk8, Niko Wanders12 1 - Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD), Regionales Klimabüro Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany; 2 - Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, The Netherlands; 3 - Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, UK; 4 - Bodeker Scientific, Alexandra, New Zealand; 5 - Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, CNRS, Paris, France; 6 - Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 7 - Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands; 8 - Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; 9 - Global Disaster
  • OECD Territorial Grids

    OECD Territorial Grids

    BETTER POLICIES FOR BETTER LIVES DES POLITIQUES MEILLEURES POUR UNE VIE MEILLEURE OECD Territorial grids August 2021 OECD Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities Contact: [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Territorial level classification ...................................................................................................................... 3 Map sources ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Map symbols ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Disclaimers .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Australia / Australie ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Austria / Autriche ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Belgium / Belgique ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Canada ......................................................................................................................................................
  • Deutsche Bahn Integrated Interim Report January – June 2019 Germany Needs a Strong Rail System MORE ROBUST, MORE POWERFUL, MORE MODERN

    Deutsche Bahn Integrated Interim Report January – June 2019 Germany Needs a Strong Rail System MORE ROBUST, MORE POWERFUL, MORE MODERN

    Deutsche Bahn Integrated Interim Report January – June 2019 Germany needs a strong rail system MORE ROBUST, MORE POWERFUL, MORE MODERN STRONG RAIL Germany needs a strong rail system more than ever before. This will enable DB Group to fully focus on making a strong rail system possible in Germany in the future. Further Information µ3 ff. A strong rail system for our climate [ 1 ] A strong rail system for our climate means: a reduction in total CO₂ emis­ sions by 10 million tons per year. This corresponds to the annual CO₂ foot­ print of one million people. A strong rail system for the people [ 2 ] A strong rail system for the people means: twice as many rail passengers and five million car trips and 14,000 air flights less in Germany every day. A strong rail system for the economy [ 3 ] A strong rail system for the economy means: increasing the rail freight transport market share in Germany to 25%. This corresponds to 13 million fewer truck trips per year on German roads. A strong rail system for Europe [ 4 ] A strong rail system for Europe means: a joint implementation of European networking by means of a strong rail system, which is the decisive factor for achiev ing European climate protection targets and economic growth. At a glance H 1 Change Selected key figures 2019 2018 absolute % KEY FINANCIAL FIGURES (€ MILLION) Revenues adjusted 22,013 21,548 + 465 + 2.2 Revenues comparable 21,926 21,548 + 378 + 1.8 Profit before taxes on income 277 560 – 283 – 50.5 Net profit (after taxes) 205 562 – 357 – 63.5 EBITDA adjusted 1) 2,534 2,304
  • Germany E-Mail: Oea-1000 @ Wp.Gate.Bmu.De Internet: Printed By: Neusser Druckerei Und Verlag Gmbh, Neuss As Of: March 1998

    Germany E-Mail: Oea-1000 @ Wp.Gate.Bmu.De Internet: Printed By: Neusser Druckerei Und Verlag Gmbh, Neuss As Of: March 1998

    Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety Federal Government Report under the Convention on Biological Diversity National Report on biological Diversity Federal Environment Ministry Imprint Published by: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety P.O. Box 12 06 29 53048 Bonn Germany E-Mail: oea-1000 @ wp.gate.bmu.de Internet: http://www.bmu.de Printed by: Neusser Druckerei und Verlag GmbH, Neuss As of: March 1998 2 Contents Summary . 7 1. Introduction: The convention on biological diversity: a new way of looking at the conservation and use of biological diversity . 8 2. Background . 10 2.1 Legal and political framework in Germany for compiling the National Report and the national strategy . 10 2.1.1 Participation of political levels, social groups and institutions in the compilation of the National Report . 10 2.1.2 Responsibilities for implementing the national strategy . 11 2.1.3 Links with European activities . 12 2.2 Brief summary of Germany's geographical, ecological and economic situation, existing biological diversity and the institutional and legal framework . 13 2.2.1 Germany's geographical and ecological situation . 13 2.2.2 Germany's economic situation . 13 2.2.3 Existing status of biological diversity in Germany . 14 2.2.4 Institutional and legal framework and current programmes . 18 3. Objectives and Models in the approach to biological diversity . 21 3.1 Models for sustainable development . 21 3.2 Principles applied in environment and nature conservation policy . 21 3.3 Conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity . 22 3.4 Specific international goals and models .