Committee Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Planning Services COMMITTEE REPORT APPLICATION DETAILS APPLICATION NO: 1/2010/0348 Residential Development to provide five dwellings FULL APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : (Resubmission) NAME OF APPLICANT : Mr T McGiven Land to the north of 8-10 Watergate Road ADDRESS : Castleside County Durham ELECTORAL DIVISION : Lanchester Steve France Senior Planning Officer CASE OFFICER : Telephone: 0191 3872263 [email protected] DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND PROPOSALS The Site 1. The application site comprises a privately owned unmaintained triangle of rough grassland to the rear (southwest) of Castleside Working Mens Club (WMC). The Club faces onto Rowley Bank, the main A68, as it passes through Castleside. The Club consists at the front of a traditional single storey stone built element, with slate roof, attached to a two-storey dwelling of similar construction. The rear part of the club is a high single storey flat-roofed, brick built building encompassing the main function rooms. Large windows take advantage of the expansive views of the countryside to the south-west. 2. The application site is accessed from the main road through the Club car park, which runs alongside and to the rear of behind the building – the car park extending around 18m from the rear of the main single storey element. Existing private garages are accessed from the club car-park at either end. The application site, triangular in shape, is otherwise enclosed on it’s three sides by residential properties, which back onto the site. The site, approximately 0.7 acres in area, falls steeply from the car-park north-east to an apex at the south-west. There is a small gap between the residential properties on the southern boundary of the site, where an electrical sub-station within a small compound is sited. Boundaries consist of a post and rail fence towards the north east of the site, a mixture of fencing and hedging forming the boundary with properties to the south and a low stone wall forming the boundary with properties on Church Street. 3. To the south of the site are the rear gardens of mainly two storey detached brick properties facing onto Watergate Road, these including a two-storey dwelling with a garage beneath taking advantage of the topography, and a bungalow with a similar parking arrangement. The dwellings in Watergate Road are a mix of post- war buildings. These modern properties extend around the corner onto Church Street. To the west of the site are the 1 ½ - 2 storey small, traditional stone terraced properties fronting Church Street. The gardens of these properties are an extension of the lower slopes below the site, with the rear accesses into the dwellings cut into the slope, the gardens therefore at a higher level, terraced by retaining walls. A larger two storey property is sited at the north-west corner of the site, with rendered and stone terraced properties facing the A68 on Rowley Bank, below the club. In between these properties and the site are the aforementioned detached garages, accessed through the club car park. With a similar arrangement to the east of the site behind semi-detached properties located on Watergate Road, at the edge of the club car park. 4. The site is visible in long distance views of Castleside from Healeyfield, to the south-west, but short distance views are restricted in aspect to those properties surrounding the land. The Proposal 5. Detailed planning permission is sought for the erection of five bungalows, consisting of three 2-bed units and 2 one-bed units in order to provide retirement homes. The site would be accessed through the existing club car park into a small courtyard parking area of eight parking spaces. The dwellings would be laid around this, one detached dwelling on each side of the entrance with a row of three terraced dwellings sloping down the site, in a westerly direction. There would be good sized gardens provided around the dwellings. A 1.2m high stonewall would be erected to the sites northeast boundary with the club car park. Boundaries between properties would consist of landscaping, with the existing timber fences and stonewalls to be retained. Landscaping would be placed around the site, adjacent the car parking area as well as within front and rear gardens as appropriate. Revised details show that landscaping has been removed from the site boundary adjacent Church Street to prevent loss of light. 6. The dwellings would be constructed in materials appropriate to the traditional local vernacular. Painted timber sash windows, sandstone water tables, chimneys and quoins are design features of the dwellings. There would be four solar panels to the rear roof slope of the dwellings. The terraced dwellings would have gable-ended roofs apart from the end-terraced property closest to existing properties on Church Street which would have a hipped roof. This would measure 7.5m at ridge and 3.5m at eaves. The group of properties would measure 29m in length and 8.6m in width. The two detached dwellings would measure 9m and 10m in length and 12.6m and 8.8m in width. The height of plot 5 to the north of the site is 4m at eaves and 8m at ridge. 7. The previously proposed installation of a pumping/storage tank station to the northwest of the site which would allow both surface water and foul water to be taken up to the main combined sewer on Rowley Bank has been replaced with a system to take all foul and surface drainage off site through a gravity fed system in the gap between properties on Watergate Road. 8. This application was originally reported to planning committee due to the principle of development on this site having been rejected by the Planning Inspectorate at an appeal in 2009, and is reported again following a deferral of the decision in October 2010. The decision was deferred for more detailed information on drainage issues, and further consideration of the effect on residential amenity. PLANNING HISTORY 9. An outline planning application for ten houses was refused in 2004. 10. A planning application for the erection of three three-storey dwellings was refused in March 2009 and dismissed by the Planning Inspectorate in December 2009 on the grounds that the site is greenfield which if developed ahead of available previously developed land would represent a less than sustainable form of development. This was deemed to be contrary to the sequential approach required by PPS1 and PPS3. The Inspector also concluded that the three storey scheme would cause serious harm to the living conditions of the residents of Church Street in respect of dominating overlooking of rear bedrooms and gardens, having an unpleasantly overbearing and dominating visual impact upon their residents contrary to policies HO5 and GDP1 of the Local Plan. 11. A planning application for five dwellings was withdrawn in June 2010 PLANNING POLICY NATIONAL POLICY : 12. In March 2012 the Government consolidated all planning policy statements, circulars and guidance into a single policy statement, termed the draft National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The overriding message from the Framework is that planning authorities should plan positively for new development, and approve all individual proposals wherever possible. It defines the role of planning in achieving sustainable development under three topic headings – economic, social and environmental, each mutually dependant. There is a presumption in favour of sustainable development. It requires local planning authorities to approach development management decisions positively, utilising twelve ‘core principles’ that should underpin both plan-making and decision taking, these being; empowering local people to shape their surroundings, proactively drive and support economic development, ensure a high standard of design, respect existing roles and character, support a low carbon future, conserve the natural environment, encourage re-use of previously developed land, promote mixed use developments, conserve heritage assets, manage future patterns of growth and take account of and support local strategies relating to health, social and cultural well-being. NPPF Part 4 – Promoting Sustainable Transport. Notes the importance of transport policies in facilitating sustainable development and contributing to wider sustainability and health issues. Local parking standards should take account of the accessibility of the development, its type, mix and use, the availability of public transport, levels of local car ownership and the need to reduce the use of high- emission vehicles. NPPF Part 6 – Delivering a wide choice of high quality homes. Housing applications should be considered in the context of a presumption in favour of sustainable development. Local Planning Authorities should seek to deliver a wide choice of high quality homes, widen opportunities for home ownership and create inclusive and mixed communities. Policies should be put in place to resist the inappropriate development of residential of residential gardens where development would cause harm to the local area. NPPF Part 7 – Requiring Good Design. The Government attaches great importance to the design of the built environment, with good design a key aspect of sustainable development, indivisible from good planning. Planning policies and decisions must aim to ensure developments; function well and add to the overall quality of an area over the lifetime of the development, establish a strong sense of place, create and sustain an appropriate mix of uses, respond to local character and history, create safe and accessible environments and be visually attractive. NPPF Part 8 – Promoting Healthy Communities. The planning system is considered to play an important role in facilitating social interaction and creating healthy, inclusive communities. Planning decisions should guard against the unnecessary loss of valued facilities and services, ensuring that existing facilities are able to develop and modernize in a way that is sustainable, and retained for the benefit of the community.