Roxanna M. Brown

History of Shipwreck Excavation in Southeast Asia Roxanna M. Brown History of Shipwreck Excavation in Southeast Asia

he Belitung wreck is a recent addition to of Jiangxi province. Thus the eyes of scholars of 1 Ayers 1978; Keith 1979, 1980. Tthe large, and continuously growing, corpus Chinese art from all over the world immediately 2 Liu Xinyuan 1998 and 1999. of maritime archaeological sites discovered in turned to Korea when a shipwreck with a cargo Southeast Asia (cf. fig. 1). This spate of under- of Chinese trade ceramics was surveyed and par- water exploration largely began three decades tially excavated in 1976.1 Coins retrieved from ago in the mid 1970s and continues unabated. the site suggested that the ship sailed in the early Since there is no central repository for informa- fourteenth century, yet the extensive ceramic tion on the various discoveries, and few ships cargo did not include blue-and-white. As a result are as well documented as the Belitung wreck, of the Sinan wreck finds, scholars concluded that it is worthwhile to review the finds in general. Jingdezhen blue-and-white was not exported The sorts of primary data offered by underwa- before about 1325. This conclusion is supported ter archaeology in Southeast Asia are certain to by recent research at Jingdezhen itself. Chinese have an impact on a variety of ongoing historical archaeologists now say that blue-and-white from debates. These debates involve questions about Jingdezhen was first exported in 1328.2 Evidence changes in shipbuilding techniques and routes from the land thus validates and corroborates over time, ship sizes, and the extent and content evidence from the sea. of trade in Asia. The wrecks offer invaluable data relevant to cycles of commerce, and they may A date for the earliest export of blue-and-white help answer questions about the spread of reli- from Jingdezhen is only one aspect of the history gions. Shipwreck cargoes also provide a bounti- of cobalt use in Asia. Cobalt produced the blue ful means to hone a more definitive chronology glaze seen on many Tang dynasty burial wares, of trade ceramics. Land sites rarely yield dates for but that glaze is quite different from the glazes ceramics so precise as potentially possible from of Jingdezhen. The colourful Tang dynasty glazes shipwrecks. Indeed, it is analysis of shipwreck are low-temperature lead glazes. The glazes of cargoes that is beginning to offer chronologies Jingdezhen are high-temperature ash glazes. that can be applied to land sites. The colourful Tang ceramics are earthenware, while underglaze blue decoration at Jingdezhen One of the most intriguing and enduring ques- is applied to high-fired stoneware and porcelain. tions in Chinese ceramics concerns the date and Following decades of claims by a few ardent circumstances that led to the introduction of Chinese collectors that there were underglaze blue-and-white ceramics at the Jingdezhen kilns blue wares in the Song dynasty, archaeologists

42 History of Shipwreck Excavation in Southeast Asia eventually did find evidence for pre-Jingdezhen Champa (a former kingdom located in central blue-and-white. In fact, the finds are also pre- Vietnam) and Thailand. 5 Like the Sinan wreck, 3 The archaeological data on pre-fourteenth-century blue-and- Song dynasty. Very old blue-and-white sherds it also did not yield Chinese blue-and-white white in is reviewed by were discovered first in 1975 and then in the wares, but it represents a time in the fifteenth Rita Tan in Gotuaco et al. 1997, xiii–xv. 1980s at Yangzhou, Jiangsu province, and they century when blue-and-white was not exported 4 The tie between ninth- and were assigned to the ninth century when the to Southeast Asia. The Thai ceramics, moreover, fourteenth-century Chinese port of Yangzhou was frequented by Arabs and came from three different production centres. blue-and-white may have to do with customer preference. Blue Persians. They are believed to have been made at For the first time here was evidence that these is a popular colour in the Middle the Gongxian kilns, Henan.3 Again, finds from three centres were all active at the same time. The East. the sea corroborate evidence on land, for the long held theory that the Sukhothai kilns closed 5 The Ko Khram is the subject of numerous articles; see, for cargo of the Belitung wreck offers three pristine, when the Sawankhalok kilns opened had to be instance, Brown 1975–76, Howitz unbroken examples of Tang dynasty blue-and- discarded. In addition to continuous re-assess- 1977, Green 1981, Rooney 1981, Green and Harper 1987. white that resemble the finds from Yangzhou and ments of this vessel and its cargo, the discovery 6 The Pontian boat is featured Gongxian (nos 107–109). and documentation of the Ko Khram wreck can in articles by Evans (1927) and be used as a signpost for the beginnings of an Gibson-Hill (1952). Manguin (1996) refers to it as an example Mysteries remain of course. No connection has amazing series of shipwreck finds in Southeast of traditional early South- east Asian boat construction. yet been established between the ninth- and Asia. Only two sites were documented prior to Booth (1984) gives the results the fourteenth-century blue-and-white wares. 1974, and more than a hundred have been re- of radiocarbon dating on the boat as 293 +/-60. The finds are Whether blue-and-white was produced in the ported since then. An average four or five more also summarized in Brown and years between is unknown. The dishes aboard are discovered every year. Sjostrand 2002. the Belitung wreck revive these old questions 7 Sieveking et al. 1954. about the origins of blue-and-white and make The first of the two sites known prior to 1974 the discussions ever more interesting.4 involves a small vessel assigned to the third–fifth centuries found in the Pontian River, Malaysia. In 1974, shortly before the Sinan wreck was In addition to being the subject of the earliest first discovered by Korean fishermen, another report on an antique boat in Southeast Asia, the shipwreck, this one from the fifteenth century, Pontian vessel remains the oldest known vessel was discovered by fishermen in the Gulf of Thai- in Southeast Asia.6 The second site involves three land. Identified as the Ko Khram (or Sattahip) vessels of the eighteenth–nineteenth centuries wreck, it carried a surprising mixture of trade ce- that were discovered together at Johore Lama, ramics from southern China, northern Vietnam, Malaysia in the 1950s.7

History of Shipwreck Excavation in Southeast Asia 43 BANGLADESH CHINA INDIA

MYANMAR (BURMA) VIETNAM

LAOS

Hoi An THAILAND

INDIAN OCEAN

CAMBODIA Ko Kradat

Samed Ngam Prasae Rayong

Binh Thuan Phu Quoc II Ko Samui Vung Tau

Phu Quoc/Vungtau Ca Mau SRI LANKA

Singtai

Longquan MALAYSIA Xuande Royal Nahai

Nanyang Desaru Turiang

INDONESIA

BELITUNG

Maranei

Intan Sea Wreck

INDONES

44 History of Shipwreck Excavation in Southeast Asia Bai Jiao I

TAIWAN

San Isidro

PHILIPPINES

Thitu Reef

PACIFIC OCEAN BRUNEI

MALAYSIA

INDONESIA

INDONESIA

PAPUA-NEW GUINEA

DONESIA

Fig. 1 Shipwreck sites in the (Map courtesy of ECAI Southeast Asia).

History of Shipwreck Excavation in Southeast Asia 45 History of Shipwreck Excavation in Southeast Asia

Shipwreck sites have been located and at least academic community about whether the pieces 8 Christie’s 1984a, 1984b and partially investigated both in international actually came from a shipwreck or not. Thus 1985. waters and within the territorial waters of almost when the same entrepreneur, Michael Hatcher, 9 In a popular book for hopeful all the countries of Southeast Asia (cf. fig. 1). found a second shipwreck, the Dutch East local treasure hunters, Tony Wells’ Shipwrecks & Sunken Treasure in Sites in international waters are investigated by Indies Company’s Geldermalsen, the excavation Southeast Asia (1995, 38), for in- stance, the story is featured under private entrepreneurs who base their salvage was documented with reports and underwater the heading ‘The Geldermalsen’s rights on international laws of the sea. Sites in photography. The sale of Geldermalsen finds as Fabulous Nanking Cargo’. The ship, which was en route from territorial waters have been excavated by the rel- The Nanking Cargo at Christie’s Amsterdam in Canton, China, to the Nether- 9 lands, sank on 3 January 1752. evant national authorities alone or sometimes in 1985 is well remembered. The event fired the conjunction with archaeologists from abroad or imaginations of treasure hunters worldwide, it 10 Liu Benan 1995. together with private companies. Sometimes the is continually cited as an example of great riches 11 See Christie’s 1984a, 1984b, work of excavation is wholly contracted out to under the sea (even though no other shipwreck 1985, 1986, 1992, 1995 and 2004; Butterfields 2000; Nagel Auctions a private company, and sometimes the country cargo in Southeast Asia has brought as much 2000. simply issues an excavation permit to salvors for money) and Chinese authorities openly admit a fee. In Vietnam, the national salvage company that the Geldermalsen sale led directly to the is usually involved. In Thailand, the Underwater creation of the Research Laboratory of Under- Archae ology section of the Fine Arts Depart- water Archaeology at Beijing History Museum ment directs excavations. There is a wide range in 1987.10 Actually, relatively few cargoes from of possibilities. The extent of published docu- shipwrecks in Southeast Asia have made it to mentation of a wrecksite also varies consider- auction houses. Five ( Hatcher’s Ming wreck, the ably. Sometimes there is a full excavation report Geldermalsen, the Diana, the Vung Tau cargo, but more often either the archaeology or the data and Binh Thuan) have been sold by Christie’s, a recording (or both) is incomplete. Yet there is a sixth ( Hoi An wreck) was sold by Butterfields in clear, loud message from experience: when fisher- San Francisco, and a seventh ( Tek Sing) was sold men or sports divers simply extract artefacts in Germany at Nagel Auctions.11 On the whole, from a wreck, when there is no documentation commercial viability for shipwrecks from South- whatsoever, these objects are less valuable both east Asia is rare. archaeologically and commercially. Besides a cargo of more than 100,000 pieces of In the case of the first shipwreck ceramics to high-quality Chinese porcelain, the Geldermalsen be sold publicly,8 there were questions from the yielded 125 shoe-shaped gold bars. Gold on ship-

46 History of Shipwreck Excavation in Southeast Asia wrecks in Southeast Asia is however normally vessels may lie in the depths of Galle harbor in Sri rare, particularly on non-European vessels. The Lanka.13 Many of them were en route from China 12 Personal communication from Pierre-Yves Manguin. gold dishes recovered from the Belitung wreck and Southeast Asia to Europe and their cargoes (nos 2–4) are extraordinary, as is the gold jewel- include Southeast Asian goods. Old Spanish 13 Examples include the Santiago (sank 1585; Martin 2001) off lery from the Intan wreck that will be mentioned galleons, en route from Manila to Acapulco in Mozambique; the Santo Antonio de Tanna (1697; see Piercy 1977, shortly. One wonders if such fine gold dishes as the Americas, have also been investigated in the 1978, 1979, 1981) at Mombasa those carried aboard the Belitung wreck were a Pacific Ocean and even off the shores of Califor- Harbour, Kenya; and three off South Africa, the Sao Bento 14 standard item of trade in the ninth century. But nia and Mexico. There have also been a number (1554; see Auret and Maggs 1982; Esterhuizen 2000), the Sao Joao until other ships from this early date are found, of excavations in China such as the Quanzhou (1552; see Esterhuizen 2000); one can only speculate. Judging by the rarity ship off the South China coast. Excavated in and Witte Leeuw (1613; see Van der Pijl-Ketel 1982). For the of the types of the Chinese Changsha ceramics 1974, the Quanzhou vessel offers a model for the Seychelles wrecksite, see Blake aboard the Belitung wreck at land-based sites, construction of southern Chinese vessels in the and Green 1986. For informa- tion on the shipwrecks being the gold vessels were perhaps equally rare. All thirteenth century, and it carried the remains of investigated at Galle, see http: evidence suggests this was an unusually rich cargo from Southeast Asia.15 Fragments of Thai //www.hum.uva.nl/galle. cargo. Only about fourteen per cent of the im- celadon that must have been loaded in Southeast 14 Remains of two Manila gal leons have been found in the ported Chinese ceramics from the ninth–tenth Asia were recovered in the excavation of another Mariannas Islands, the Nuestra 16 Senora de la Concepcion (lost centuries at Palembang, the site of the old capital vessel in Hong Kong. There are also ships, such 1638) at Saipan (Mathers and of Srivijaya on in the seventh–eleventh as the Batavia17 and Vergulde Draeck18 that sank Shaw 1993) and the Santa Marga- rita at Rota (IOTA Partners 1996, centuries, for instance, are from Changsha. off the coast of Western Australia. All these can Cuevas et al. 1997). The remains Most of the Palembang debris fragments from be included in a list of Southeast Asia sites of others have been identified at Drake’s Bay in California this time are Yue, Yue type and Guangdong (Shangraw and Van der Porten 12 1981) and near Encinada, Mexico wares. Ceramics from Changsha have not been The one major area where no wrecksites have yet (personal communication from re covered from any other wrecksite. been documented is the waters of Burma and the Edward Van der Porten). eastern shores of India. Research on underwater 15 Salmon and Lombard 1979; Keith and Buys 1981; Green It is impossible to be precise about an actual sites along the western coast of India is almost as 1983a; Li Guoqing 1989. number for the shipwrecks found to date in scanty. A single maritime investigation by Indian 16 Frost et al. 1974. Southeast Asia. One problem is geographical archaeologists in 1997–1999 revealed only the limits. There are a number of Portuguese and remains of an unidentified vessel from the seven- 17 Stanbury 1975. Dutch wrecks in the Indian Ocean off the coast of teenth–eighteenth centuries.19 For this reason the 18 Green 1977.

Africa for instance, the remains of a Portuguese Belitung wreck offers a further point of signifi- 19 Tripati et al. 2001. More vessel in the Seychelles, and a few other European cance. It originated in the western Indian Ocean recently, the remains of an eleventh–thirteenth-centuries vessel were discovered on land in South India; see Pedersen 2003.

History of Shipwreck Excavation in Southeast Asia 47 History of Shipwreck Excavation in Southeast Asia

(either the Middle East or India), yet there is no Jeremy Green and Rosemary Harper, The Mari- 20 Brown and Sjostrand 2002. strong corpus of shipwreck archaeology there for time Archaeology of Shipwrecks and Ce ramics in The exhibition, entitled ‘Ma- laysian Maritime Archaeology’, comparisons. Southeast Asia (1987), and two volumes in opened in November 2001 and Thai with short English summaries, Vidya In- will be on view at least through 2004. The catalogue presents the My personal list of wrecksites includes sites takosai and Pisit Charoenwongsa (ed.), Under- first attempt to place ceramic cargoes of the fourteenth–six- known to fishermen, sports divers and/or pri- water Archaeology in Thailand (1988) and Pisit teenth centuries in relative vate salvors that have not been reported in Charoenwongsa and Sayan Praicharnjit (ed.), chronological order. print. In some cases there are no public reports Underwater Archaeology in Thailand II: Ceramics because the cargo is not commercially viable. If from the Gulf of Thailand (1990). Any summary it becomes clear that not even publication will is however quickly out-of-date, since more new increase the sales price of a cargo sufficiently to sites are discovered each year, and sometimes cover expenses, the complicated efforts of proper there is further excavation of old sites. Green documentation and publication are often aban- and Harper (1987), for instance, mention some doned. The academic world benefits most when thirty-three wrecksites, and this includes various collectors and museums, as well as archaeolo- vessels off Korea (two sites), South China (two), gists, see value in shipwreck cargoes. Africa (five), the Seychelles (one) and Western Australia (two). My own informal list, which in- While some wrecksites become the subject of a cludes the sites enumerated in Green and Harper newspaper or magazine article and then disap- as well as finds through early 2004, numbers pear from view, many good articles on shipwreck 175 entries, with 129 of them in Southeast Asia finds in Southeast Asia have appeared in The proper. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, and the Internet has become an alternate means The most recent retrospective on shipwreck of publication. A number of websites on the archaeology is being staged as an exhibition at World Wide Web now feature news and articles the Kuala Lumpur National Museum, Malaysia. on the excavations of shipwrecks in Southeast Accompanied by a catalogue,20 the exhibition Asia (Several of these websites are listed in this features eleven vessels. These range from the volume, p. 753). Pontian boat of the third–fifth centuries that was discovered in an eroding riverbank to ten wreck- The few attempts to summarize nautical finds in sites covering the fourteenth–nineteenth centu- Southeast Asia include an indispensable study by ries off the coasts of peninsular Malaysia. With

48 History of Shipwreck Excavation in Southeast Asia vessels from South China, Great Britain and the coins, of course, but it may be many decades or Netherlands, as well as a variety of others from even centuries later. Yongle coins were recovered 21 L’Hour 2001. 23 Southeast Asia, the exhibition is wide-ranging. from the Maranei wreck, which is probably no 22 The Tek Sing was discovered Aside from Malaysia, assorted shipwreck ma- later than the Yongle reign (1403–1424), and they in May 1999; see Nagel Auctions 2000. terials are generally on permanent display in were also the latest coins recovered from two sites national museums in Thailand (particularly the that belong to the mid- and late fifteenth cen- 23 Flecker 2001b. Maritime Museum at Chantaburi), the Philip- tury: the Pandanan 24 and Hoi An25 ships respec- 24 Loviny 1996. pines, and Vietnam. Artefacts from a ship that tively. Radiocarbon results, moreover, most often 25 Butterfields 2000. sank about 1500 discovered off its coast are on give possible time ranges of 150 years and more, 26 One of the nine Butuan boats, view at the Brunei National Museum.21 with each of those years – even the first and last which are otherwise thought to be thirteenth-century, may be- in a given range – equally possible. In most cases, long to about the fourth century; It should be mentioned that in the case of Eu- the ceramics recovered can already be dated with see Peralta 1980. ropean vessels such as the Nassau (Dutch 1606), similar or better precision. Radiocarbon testing Risdam (Dutch 1727) and Diana (British 1817) is however valuable as collaborating evidence for that were excavated off Malaysia, both the name the age of a shipwreck. of the vessel and the exact date of the loss are known from contemporaneous records. For the So few of the known wrecksites belong to the many Asian vessels discovered in Southeast Asia, years before the thirteenth century that they can however, neither a name nor date are known. The be quickly reviewed. The Pontian boat (third– Tek Sing, a Chinese vessel that sank in Indone- fifth centuries)26 and the Belitung wreck (ninth sian waters in 1822, is an exception.22 The Asian century)