Mankind and Terror

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mankind and Terror Mankind and Terror ISTORY TEACHES US that terror as a means of fright­ ening people into submission can appear in an extraordinary H variety of forms and can be closely linked with a large number of political and party systems that have become familiar to us. The terror of tyrants, despots, and dictators is documented from ancient times on, the terror of revolutions and counter-revolutions, of majorities against minorities and of minorities against the majority of humanity, the terror of plebiscitary democracies and of modern one-party systems, the terror ofrevolutionary movements and the terror ofsmall groups ofconspirators. Political science cannot content itself with simply establishing the fact that terror has been used to intimidate people. Rather, it must separate out and clarify the differences between all these forms of terror regimes, forms that assign quite different functions to terror in each specific regime. In what follows here, we will deal only with totalitarian terror as it appears in the two totalitarian political systems most familiar to us: Nazi Germany after 1938 and Soviet Russia after 1930. The key difference Speech, in German, for RIAS Radio University, March 23, 1953. English translation by Robert and Rita Kimber. 297 298 / ESSAYS IN UNDERSTANDING between totalitarian terror and all other forms of terror we know of is not that it existed on a quantitatively larger scale and claimed a larger number of victims. Who would dare to measure and compare the fears human beings experienced? And who has not wondered whether the number of the victims and the increasing indifference of others toward them are not linked closely to an increase in population that has bred in all modern mass states a kind of Asiatic indifference to the value of human life and a conviction, no longer even concealed, of the superfluity of human beings? Wherever we find terror in the past, it is rooted in the use of force that originates outside the law and in many cases is consciously applied to tear down the fences of law that protect human freedom and guarantee citizens' freedoms and rights. From history, we are familiar with the mass terror of revolutions in whose furor the guilty and the innocent die, until the bloodbath of the counter-revolution suffocates the furor in apathy or until a new reign of law puts an end to the terror. If we single out the two forms of terror that have been historically the most effective and politically the bloodiest-the terror oftyranny and the terror of revolution-we soon see that they are directed toward an end and find an end. The terror of tyranny reaches an end once it has paralyzed or even totally dispensed with all public life and made private individuals out of all citizens, stripping them of interest in and a connection with public affairs. And public affairs are concerned, of course, with much more than we generally circumscribe with the term "politics." Tyrannical terror has come to an end when it has imposed a graveyard peace on a country. The end of a revolution is a new code of laws-or counter­ revolution. The terror finds its end when the opposition is destroyed, when nobody dares lift a finger, or when the revolution has exhausted all reserves of strength. Totalitarian terror is so often confused with the intimidation mea­ sures of tyranny or the terror of civil wars and revolutions because the totalitarian regimes we are familiar with developed directly out of civil wars and one-party dictatorships and in their beginnings, before they became totalitarian, used terror in precisely the same way as other des­ potic regimes we know of from history. The turning point that decides whether a one-party system will remain a dictatorship or develop into a form of totalitarian rule always comes when every last trace of active or passive opposition in the country has been drowned in blood and terror. MANKIND AND TERROR /299 Genuinely totalitarian terror, however, sets in only when the regime has no more enemies who can be arrested and tortured to death and when even the different classes of suspects are eliminated and can no longer be taken into "protective custody." From this first characteristic of totalitarian terror-that it does not shrink but grows as the opposition is reduced-follow the next two key features. Terror that is directed against neither suspects nor enemies of the regime can turn only to absolutely innocent people who have done nothing wrong and in the literal sense of the word do not know why they are being arrested, sent to concentration camps, or liquidated. The second key factor follows from this, namely, that the graveyard peace that spreads over the land under pure tyranny as well as under the despotic rule of victorious revolutions, and during which the country can recover, is never granted to a country under totalitarian rule. There is no end to the terror, and it is a matter of principle with such regimes that there can be no peace. As totalitarian movements promise their adherents before they come to power, everything will remain in per­ manent flux. Trotsky, who first coined the phrase "permanent revolu­ tion," no more understood what that really meant than Mussolini, to whom we owe the term "total state," knew what totalitarianism meant. This is clear both in Russia and in Germany. In Russia, the con­ centration camps that were originally built for enemies of the Soviet regime began to grow enormously after 1930, that is, at a time not only when the armed resistance of the civil-war period had been crushed but also when Stalin had liquidated the opposition groups within the party. During the first years of Nazi dictatorship in Germany there were at most ten camps, with no more than 10,000 inmates. By about 1936 all effective resistance to the regime had died out, partly because the pre­ ceding and extraordinarily bloody and brutal terror had destroyed all the active forces (the number of deaths in the first concentration camps and in the Gestapo cellars was extremely high) and partly because the apparent solution of the unemployment problem had won over many working-class people who had originally opposed the Nazis. It was at this very time, in the first months of 1937, that Himmler gave his famous speech to the Wehrmacht in which he expressed the need for major enlargement of the concentration camps and announced that it would be undertaken in the near future. By the time war broke out there were already more than 100 concentration camps that from 1940 on must have 300 / ESSAYS IN UNDERSTANDING collectively had an average constant population of a million inmates. The corresponding numbers for the Soviet Union are vastly higher. There are different estimates, the lowest being about 10 million people, the highest, about 25 million. The fact that terror becomes totalitarian after the liquidation of the political opposition does not mean that the totalitarian regime then fully renounces acts ofintimidation. The initial terror is replaced by draconian legislation that establishes in law what will be considered "transgres­ sions"-interracial sexual relations or arriving late for work, i.e., in­ sufficient grasp of the Bolshevist system, in which the worker belongs body and soul to a production process guided by principles of political terror-and so retroactively legalizes the initial reign of terror. This retroactive legalization of conditions created by revolutionary terror is a natural step in revolutionary legislation. The new draconian measures were supposed to put an end to the extra-legal terror and establish the new law of the revolution. What is characteristic of totalitarian regimes is not that they too pass new laws of this kind, such as the Nuremberg laws, but that they do not stop there. Instead, they retain terror as a power functioning outside the law. Consequently, totalitarian terror pays no more attention to the laws decreed by the totalitarian regime than it does to those in effect before the regime's assumption of power. All laws, including the Bolshevist and Nazi laws, become a fa~ade whose purpose is to keep the population constantly aware that the laws, no matter what their nature or origin, do not really matter. This becomes all too clear in documents from the Third Reich that show Nazi judges and often even party agencies desperately trying to judge crimes according to a specific code and to protect duly sentenced people from the "excesses" of terror. To cite only one example from many: We know that people who were convicted of racial violations after 1936 and were sentenced to prison by normal legal procedures were then sent to concentration camps after already having served their prison terms. Because of its racial ideology, Nazi Germany could fill its concen­ tration camps with a majority of innocent people far more easily than the Soviet Union could. It could maintain some sense of order without having to adhere to any criteria of guilt or innocence simply by arresting certain racial groups on no other grounds than race: first, after 1938, the Jews; then later, indiscriminately, members of Eastern European ethnic groups. Because the Nazis had declared these non-Germanic MANKIND AND TERROR / 301 ethnic groups enemies of the regime, it could uphold the pretense of their "guilt." Hitler, who in this matter as in all others always contem­ plated the most radical and far-reaching measures, saw a time coming after the war when these groups would have been eradicated and a need for new categories would arise. In a 1943 draft for a comprehensive Reich health law, he therefore suggested that after the war all Germans should be X-rayed and that all families in which anyone suffered from a lung or heart disease should be incarcerated in camps.
Recommended publications
  • The Three Phases of Arendt's Theory of Totalitarianism*
    The Three Phases of Arendt's Theory of Totalitarianism* X~1ANNAH Arendt's The Origins of Totalitarianism, first published in 1951, is a bewilderingly wide-ranging work, a book about much more than just totalitarianism and its immediate origins.' In fact, it is not really about those immediate origins at all. The book's peculiar organization creates a certain ambiguity regarding its intended subject-matter and scope.^ The first part, "Anti- semitism," tells the story of tbe rise of modern, secular anti-Semi- tism (as distinct from what the author calls "religious Jew-hatred") up to the turn of the twentieth century, and ends with the Drey- fus affair in Erance—a "dress rehearsal," in Arendt's words, for things still worse to come (10). The second part, "Imperialism," surveys an assortment of pathologies in the world politics of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, leading to (but not direcdy involving) the Eirst World War. This part of the book examines the European powers' rapacious expansionist policies in Africa and Asia—in which overseas investment became the pre- text for raw, openly racist exploitation—and the concomitant emergence in Central and Eastern Europe of "tribalist" ethnic movements whose (failed) ambition was the replication of those *Earlier versions of this essay were presented at the University of Virginia and at the conference commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of The Origins of Toudilarianism hosted by the Hannah Arendt-Zentrum at Carl Ossietzky University in Oldenburg, Ger- many. I am grateful to Joshua Dienstag and Antonia Gnmenberg. respectively, for arrang- ing these (wo occasions, and also to the inembers of the audience at each—especially Lawrie Balfour, Wolfgang Heuer, George KJosko, Allan Megili, Alfons Sollner, and Zoltan Szankay—for their helpful commeiiLs and criticisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Cultural Experimentation as Regulatory Mechanism in Response to Events of War and Revolution in Russia (1914-1940) Anita Tárnai Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Anita Tárnai All rights reserved ABSTRACT Cultural Experimentation as Regulatory Mechanism in Response to Events of War and Revolution in Russia (1914-1940) Anita Tárnai From 1914 to 1940 Russia lived through a series of traumatic events: World War I, the Bolshevik revolution, the Civil War, famine, and the Bolshevik and subsequently Stalinist terror. These events precipitated and facilitated a complete breakdown of the status quo associated with the tsarist regime and led to the emergence and eventual pervasive presence of a culture of violence propagated by the Bolshevik regime. This dissertation explores how the ongoing exposure to trauma impaired ordinary perception and everyday language use, which, in turn, informed literary language use in the writings of Viktor Shklovsky, the prominent Formalist theoretician, and of the avant-garde writer, Daniil Kharms. While trauma studies usually focus on the reconstructive and redeeming features of trauma narratives, I invite readers to explore the structural features of literary language and how these features parallel mechanisms of cognitive processing, established by medical research, that take place in the mind affected by traumatic encounters. Central to my analysis are Shklovsky’s memoir A Sentimental Journey and his early articles on the theory of prose “Art as Device” and “The Relationship between Devices of Plot Construction and General Devices of Style” and Daniil Karms’s theoretical writings on the concepts of “nothingness,” “circle,” and “zero,” and his prose work written in the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE March 12 Repair, Or Construction; to the Committee on by Mr.AVERY: - by Mr
    3824 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-- SENATE March 12 repair, or construction; to the Committee on By Mr.AVERY: - By Mr. McDONOUGH: Banking and Currency. H.R. 10670. A bill to declare that certain H.R.10673. A bill for the relief-of Eng (Ng) By Mr. WILLIAMS: land of the United States is held by the Yook Gee; to the Committee on the Judi­ H.R. 10654. A bill to support the price of United States in trust for the Prairie Band ciary. soybeans; to the Committee on Agriculture. of Pottawatomie Indians In Kansas; to the H.R. 10674. A bill for the relief of Toshi­ H.R. 10655. A bill to amend section 402 of Conunittee on Interior and· Insular Affairs. nori Kondo; to the Committee on the Judi­ the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 to require By Mr. ARENDS: ciary. approval by the Civil Aeronautics Board of H.J. Res. 656. Joint resolution authoriz­ H.R. 10675. A bill for the relief of Mrs. certain schedules of foreign air carriers; ing the Secretary of the Navy to receive for Umeno Taga; to the Committee on the Judi­ to the Committee on Interstate and Foreign instruction at the U.S. Naval\ Academy at ciary. Commerce. Annapolis two citizens and subjects of the By Mr. MACGREGOR: H.R. 10656. A bill to prescribe the oath of Kingdom of Belgium; to the Committee on H.R. 10676. A bill for the relief of Dr. office of justices and judges of the United Armed Services. Shaoul G. S. Shashoua; to the Committee States; to the Committee on the Judicia~y.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation After Crash 4-7-10
    Roma De Profundis: Post-Economic Miracle Rome and the Films of Dario Argento (1970-1982) By Michael Loren Siegel B.A., University of Michigan, 2000 M.A., Brown University, 2003 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Modern Culture and Media at Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May 2010 © Copyright 2010 by Michael Loren Siegel This dissertation by Michael Loren Siegel is accepted in its present form by the Department of Modern Culture and Media as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Date___________ ___________________________________ Professor Mary Ann Doane, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date___________ ___________________________________ Professor Philip Rosen, Reader Date___________ ___________________________________ Professor Massimo Riva, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date___________ ___________________________________ Professor Sheila Bonde, Dean of the Graduate School iii VITA Michael Loren Siegel was born on July 31, 1978 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He earned his B.A. in Film and Video Studies at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan in 2000, and his M.A. in Modern Culture and Media at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island in 2003. His work on Italian cinema, television, urbanity, and visual culture has been published in the anthologies Cinematic Rome (ed. Richard Wrigley) and The Place of the Moving Image (eds. John David Rhodes and Elena Gorfinkel), and is forthcoming in A Companion to Italian Cinema (ed. Peter Brunette) and the British Film Institute’s centenary collection on Michelangelo Antonioni (ed. John David Rhodes). ! iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Writing a dissertation can be an intensely isolating experience.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.1 Anti-Colonial Terrorism: the Algerian Struggle
    1 EMMANOUIL ARETOULAKIS National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece Terrorism and Literariness: The terrorist event in the 20th and 21st centuries 2 Terrorism and Literariness: The terrorist event in the 20th and 21st centuries Author Emmanouil Aretoulakis NATIONAL AND KAPODISTRIAN UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS, GREECE Critical Reader William Schultz Editor Anastasia Tsiadimou ISBN: 978-960-603-462-6 Copyright © ΣΔΑΒ, 2015 Το παρόν έργο αδειοδοηείηαι σπό ηοσς όροσς ηης άδειας Creative Commons. Αναθορά Γημιοσργού - Μη Δμπορική Χρήζη - Παρόμοια Γιανομή 3.0. Για να δείηε ένα ανηίγραθο ηης άδειας ασηής επιζκεθηείηε ηον ιζηόηοπο https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/gr/ HELLENIC ACADEMIC LIBRARIES Δθνικό Μεηζόβιο Πολσηετνείο Ζρώων Πολσηετνείοσ 9, 15780 Εωγράθοσ www.kallipos.gr 3 Front cover picture Baricades set up during the Algerian War of Independence. January 1960. Street of Algier. Photo by Michel Marcheux, CC-BY-SA-2.5,wikipedia http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image 4 Table of Contents Abbreviation List ........................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 8 The end of History, the Clash of Civilizations and the question of the Real: Historico-Political Peregrinations ............................................................................ 12 Revolutionary Art, Theory, and Literature as Violence ........................................... 18 Notes........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Korean Cinema and the Conditions of Capitalist Individuation
    The Intimacy of Distance: South Korean Cinema and the Conditions of Capitalist Individuation By Jisung Catherine Kim A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Film and Media in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kristen Whissel, Chair Professor Mark Sandberg Professor Elaine Kim Fall 2013 The Intimacy of Distance: South Korean Cinema and the Conditions of Capitalist Individuation © 2013 by Jisung Catherine Kim Abstract The Intimacy of Distance: South Korean Cinema and the Conditions of Capitalist Individuation by Jisung Catherine Kim Doctor of Philosophy in Film and Media University of California, Berkeley Professor Kristen Whissel, Chair In The Intimacy of Distance, I reconceive the historical experience of capitalism’s globalization through the vantage point of South Korean cinema. According to world leaders’ discursive construction of South Korea, South Korea is a site of “progress” that proves the superiority of the free market capitalist system for “developing” the so-called “Third World.” Challenging this contention, my dissertation demonstrates how recent South Korean cinema made between 1998 and the first decade of the twenty-first century rearticulates South Korea as a site of economic disaster, ongoing historical trauma and what I call impassible “transmodernity” (compulsory capitalist restructuring alongside, and in conflict with, deep-seated tradition). Made during the first years after the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis and the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, the films under consideration here visualize the various dystopian social and economic changes attendant upon epidemic capitalist restructuring: social alienation, familial fragmentation, and widening economic division.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Utopia and Its Negative
    Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century by Matthew Benjamin Cole Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael Gillespie, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Tom Spragens, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Ruth Grant ___________________________ Malachi Hacohen Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 i v ABSTRACT Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century by Matthew Benjamin Cole Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael Gillespie, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Tom Spragens, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Ruth Grant ___________________________ Malachi Hacohen An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 i v Copyright by Matthew Cole 2017 Abstract My dissertation offers an interpretation of twentieth century political thought which emphasizes the influence of dystopian images, themes, and anxieties. Drawing examples from philosophy, literature, and social science, I show how negative visions of future society have played an important critical function in our contemporary understanding of freedom, power,
    [Show full text]
  • Front Line Assembly - Bio
    FRONT LINE ASSEMBLY - BIO Front Line Assembly is the primary focus of Vancouver-based musician Bill Leeb. A founding member of Skinny Puppy, Leeb moved on to form FLA in 1986 with Michael Balch, releasing some cassettes (since released as Total Terror I & II) which paved the way for their 1987 releases: The Initial Command, State of Mind, and Corrosion. In late 1988, they recorded the mini-LP Disorder, since combined with Corrosion and released as Corroded Disorder. Their 1989 release, Gashed Senses and Crossfire, further cemented their popularity in the industrial scene, and prompted their first world tour. By 1990, Balch had departed and Rhys Fulber rounded out the duo, releasing Caustic Grip. But it was two years later when the duo released the classic album, Tactical Neural Implant, which has become for many, the genre's crowning moment. To this day, TNI still defines the best of industrial music. FLA enraged many of their fans in 1994 when they began to experiment with their established electronic-only sound. Millenium, with its heavy doses of live and sampled metal guitars, dared its audience to grow and expand with the band beyond industrial's perceived barriers. Front Line stepped to the firing line again in 1995 with Hard Wired, which reflected both a return to form and a continued embracing of the guitar. Hard Wired not only picked up where Implant left off, it improved on the sound by adding in elements of all of their side projects. A fall European tour was recorded for the 1996 release Live Wired, their first concert CD ever.
    [Show full text]
  • A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again: Essays And
    Praise for David Foster Wallace’s a supposedly fun thing i’ll never do again “Further cements Wal ace’s reputation as probably the most ambitious and prodigious literary talent of his generation, an erupting Vesuvius of prose and ideas and intel ect.” —John Marshal , Seattle Post Intelligencer “The title essay is worth the price of the book… irrefutable proof of comic genius…. Yes, he’s a great writer, get used to it.” —Adam Begley, New York Observer “Wal ace puts enough energy, attitude, thought, ‘fun’ (in and out of quotes) and sheer information into any single page to wear me out. But they don’t…. As long as he’s wil ing to get down and rassle with this stuff, I’m glad to sit here and read al about it.” —David Gates, Newsweek “You don’t want to miss out on reading David Foster Wal ace. Yes, he’s that good.” —Kane Webb, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette “He has Gore Vidal’s biting wit, Christopher Hitchens’s ability to disrobe intel ectual impostors, and Pynchon’s sense of the bizarre…. Not just refreshing, it’s downright exhilarating.” —David Daley, Hartford Courant “Wal ace’s sheer verbal precocity and versatility stun.” —Joan Hinkemeyer, Rocky Mountain News “DFW is smart and funny, a man from whose word processor flows a torrent of bril iant observations and hysterical wit. Do your disposition and your mind a favor: Read this book.” —Steven E. Alford, Houston Chronicle “A marvelous book…. Sparkling reportage…. If one wants to see the zeitgeist auto-grappling, in al its necessary confusions, one must read every essay in this book.” —James Wood, Newsday “Funny as al get-out….
    [Show full text]
  • Antigone Claimed, "I Am a Stranger": Democracy, Membership and Unauthorized Immigration
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Fall November 2014 ANTIGONE CLAIMED, "I AM A STRANGER": DEMOCRACY, MEMBERSHIP AND UNAUTHORIZED IMMIGRATION ANDRES FABIAN HENAO CASTRO University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Ancient Philosophy Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, Continental Philosophy Commons, Dramatic Literature, Criticism and Theory Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legal Theory Commons, Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Performance Studies Commons, Political Theory Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Theory, Knowledge and Science Commons, and the Visual Studies Commons Recommended Citation HENAO CASTRO, ANDRES FABIAN, "ANTIGONE CLAIMED, "I AM A STRANGER": DEMOCRACY, MEMBERSHIP AND UNAUTHORIZED IMMIGRATION" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 211. https://doi.org/10.7275/5842739.0 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/211 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information,
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis and Critique Book.Pdf
    When a person is in crisis, she goes to see a psychoanalyst. When society is in crisis, sociology emerges as psychoanalysis on a grand scale. And when critique enters into crisis, one turns to Rodrigo Cordero. Not that one will find a way out of the crisis, but following a rich investigation of the relation between critique and crisis in social theory, from Marx to Habermas and Arendt to Foucault, one will rediscover the human frailty in the cracks of society and our responsibility to respond to it. Frederic Vandenberghe, Professor in Sociology at the Institute of Social and Political Studies, Rio de Janeiro State University. Author of A Philosophical History of German Sociology Rodrigo Cordero has done a magnificent job in shedding light on the pivotal role that both crisis and critique play in the tension- laden construction of human reality. This book is a powerful reminder of the profound fragility that permeates the whole of social life, including its seemingly most solidified dimensions. I have never come across a more persuasive account of the multiple ways in which the dynamic relationship between the experience of crisis and the practice of cri- tique defines—and, indeed, constantly redefines—the normative parameters for what it means to be human. Simon Susen, City University London. Author of The ‘Postmodern Turn’ in the Social Sciences and The Foundations of the Social: Between Critical Theory and Reflexive Sociology “Society is not a solid crystal, but an organism capable of change, and constantly engaged in a process of change.” This quote from the Preface to Capital signifies not only a cornerstone of sociology but is more actual than ever.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis and Critique on the Fragile Foundations of Social Life
    Crisis and Critique On the Fragile Foundations of Social Life Rodrigo Cordero Introduction When the World Becomes a Problem Social life is a delicate and complex achievement. Normally, the everyday surface of social institutions and practices makes us forget that the seemingly unitary and durable character of the social world is inherently fragile, without fixed and ultimate foundations. This sense of fragility circulates discretely, almost silently until something breaks and, like a seismic event, disturbs the common sense of order. This is the moment of crisis: the moment at which the world around us becomes problematic and loses its character as a unitary and natural phenomenon. The sense of distress, discontinuity and uncertainty all concur for crisis to become a moment ripe for questioning the conventional char- acter of social norms and the intelligibility of social facts. By putting things into question practically, crisis interrupts the continuity of what appears solid, justi- fied and functional; it opens a breach in meaning and established practices that we cannot simply bypass. In a way, crisis is the moment where we are compelled to ask questions: where are we, what is going on, what went wrong, how we can get out of here? This exercise of placing questions, however small it sometimes may appear, is precisely what breaks the silence of things and interrupts the sense of completion of the world. In other words, it places us in relation to the limits of the frameworks that sustain our forms of life and, therefore, in relation to a world that is not immune to questioning.
    [Show full text]