DOCSLIB.ORG

HS1 Ltd HS1 (Section 2) Register of Infrastructure R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO Revision 01, Date 15 July 2009 Page 1 of 90

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HS1 Ltd HS1 (Section 2) Register of Infrastructure R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO Revision 01, Date 15 July 2009 Page 1 of 90 HS1 (Section 2) Register of Infrastructure (Southfleet Junction to St Pancras International) Document Reference: [ R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO URS· Document History Rev. Issue Date Descriotion Author Checked Approved AA 31-0ct-2006 1st draft - URN review Ken Harvey Keith Watson AB 24-Nov-2006 2nd draft - NR(CTRL) review Ken Harvey Keith Watson AC 01-Mar-2007 3rd draft - NoSo review Ken Harvev Keith Watson 00 17-Aug-2007 First formal issue Ken Harvey Keith Watson Dave Pointon 01 15-July-2009 Second issue following Richard Keith Watson Paul Chapman review Schofield ~9 Ilj~~ Approval Signatures for Current Version: ~fr For NR(CTRL) Ltd S1 Ltd Safety & HS1 Ltd (Infrastructure Operations Managing Manager) Advisor Director - 1 ­ R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO HS1 Ltd HS1 (Section 2) Register of Infrastructure R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO Revision 01, Date 15 July 2009 Page 2 of 90 Table of Contents Background 5 0.1. Ownership of the Register 6 0.2. General Information 6 0.3. Scope of Section 2 of the HS1 7 0.4. Format of the Register 8 0.5. References 8 Part 1: Characteristics of the Infrastructure Subsystem 10 1.1. Descriptive Map 10 1.2. Line of Route 10 1.2.1. Geographic Location of Crossovers and Junctions 11 1.2.2. Significant Noticeable Lineside Features 12 1.2.3. Road Access Points 13 1.2.4. Structures and Tunnels 13 1.3. Stations 16 1.4. Capacity and Performance Levels 18 1.5. Type of Electrification 18 1.6. Basic Parameters 18 1.7. Other Characteristics Relevant to Infrastructure TSI. 21 1.7.1. Loads on Structures 23 1.7.2. Hot Axle Box Detectors 24 1.7.3. Derailer Sleepers 24 Part 2: Characteristics of the Energy Subsystem 26 2.1. Voltage and Frequency 26 2.2. Contact Wire Characteristics 26 2.3. Environmental Conditions 27 2.4. Pantograph Characteristics 28 2.5. Phase Separations 30 2.6. System Separations 31 2.7. Category of Line 31 2.8. Regenerative Braking 31 2.9. Harmonic Characteristics 32 2.10. Power/Current Limitation 32 2.11. Electric Protection Coordination 32 2.12. Any Other Divergence from the TSI 32 Part 3: Characteristics of the Control-Command and Signalling Subsystem 33 3.1. Signalling System 34 3.2. ERTMS/ETCS Level of Application 35 3.3. Application of Class B System 35 3.4. ERTMS/ETCS Level 1: Rolling Stock Implementation Requirements 36 3.5. Switch Over Between Different Class B Systems 36 - 2­ R-SG-NC-DDDD2-17-HSO HS1 Ltd HS1 (Section 2) Register of Infrastructure R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO Revision 01, Date 15 July 2009 Page 3 of 90 3.5.1. Network Rail to HS1 37 3.5.2. HS1 to Network Rail 37 3.6. Switch Over between Different Radio System 37 3.7. Technical Degraded Modes 38 3.8. Speed Limits 38 3.9. Electromagnetic Compatibility 38 3.10. Climatic and Physical Conditions 39 Part 4: Operational Conditions 40 4.1. Effects of cross winds .40 4.2. Exceptions in the Case of Execution ofWorks .41 Part 5: Performance Requirements for Rolling Stock 43 5.1. Maximum Speed 43 5.2. Maximum Train Length 44 5.3. Maximum Axle Load 44 5.4. Minimum Acceptable Braking Rates .44 5.4.1. Maximum Service Braking .45 5.4.2. Emergency Braking .45 5.4.3. Values for Control Curve .46 5.4.4. Usual Service Braking .47 5.5. Special Requirements 47 Appendix 1 - HS1 Section 2 Line of Route Description 49 Appendix 2 - HS1 Section 2 Schematic Layout Alignment.. 51 Appendix 3 - HS1 Section 2 Station Layouts 55 Appendix 4 - HS1 Section 2 Tunnel Schematics 59 Appendix 5 - List of HS1 Section 2 Access Points: Emergency Services 64 Appendix 6 - Traction Power Feeding and Sectioning 71 Appendix 7 - HS 1 Electrical Protection Arrangements 74 Appendix 8 - HS1 Traction Harmonic Reference Profile 83 Appendix 9 - Daily Notice 85 - 3­ R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO HS1 ltd HS1 (Section 2) Register of Infrastructure R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO Revision 01, Date 15 July 2009 Page 4 of 90 Glossary of Terms AC Alternating Current ATP Automatic Train Protection AWS Advanced Warning System CCS Control-Command Signalling (TSI) CSR Cab Secure Radio CTRL Channel Tunnel Rail Link (now called HS1) DC Direct Current EC European Commission EMC Electromagnetic Compatibility EMI Electromagnetic Interference EMU Electric Multiple Unit ENE Energy (TSI) ERTMS European Rail Traffic Management System ET Eurotunnel ETCS European Train Control System GSM-R HS1 General Purpose Radio (GPR) HDR Hither Green - Dartford - Rochester (NR line at Springhead Junction) HS1 HS1. This is the new name for the Channel Tunnel Rail Link. HS1 comprises both HS1 Sections 1 and 2 HS1 (Ltd) HS1 Limited, the owner of the HS1 asset INS Infrastructure (TSI) ITCS Interlocking and Train Control System ITL Intermittent Transmission Loop KVB System of Speed Control Utilising Beacons NGC National Grid Company NRIL Network Rail Infrastructure Limited NR(CTRL) Network Rail (CTRL) Limited OCS Overhead Catenary System OHLE Overhead Line Electrification RCC Rail Control Centre SNCF Societe Nationale des chemins de fer Francais SRA Strategic Rail Authority STM Special Transmission Module TD Train Describer TENS Trans-European High-Speed Rail Network TGV Train a Grande Vitesse TPWS Train Protection and Warning System TSI Technical Specification for Interoperability TVM Transmission Voie Machine UIC Union Internationale des chemins de fer URN Union Railways North - Client for HS1 Section 2 URS Union Railways South - Client for HS1 Section 1 VCB Vacuum Circuit Beaker Note that certain document titles retain the previous name of the infrastructure, such as the CTRL Rule Book. They have not been changed in the Register to avoid possible confusion. -4­ R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO HS1 Ltd HS1 (Section 2) Register of Infrastructure R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO Revision 01, Date 15 July 2009 Page 5 of 90 HS1 (SECTION 2) REGISTER OF INFRASTRUCTURE Background HS1 is a new high-speed railway between London and the Channel Tunnel. The railway is part of the trans-European high-speed rail network (TENS) and completes the high-speed international route between London and Paris, and London and Brussels. Domestic passenger trains also use the railway (between Ashford / Ebbsfleet HL and St Pancras International), providing a much improved commuter service between London and Kent. The railway is capable of carrying freight traffic. It was constructed in two phases: Section 1: between the Channel Tunnel at Cheriton and Southfleet Junction; including connections to the existing Ashford International Passenger Station and a connection from Southfleet Junction to Fawkham Junction provided to allow international Eurostar services to access the existing Waterloo International Station (prior to the completion of Section 2 and the opening of St Pancras International Station), Section 2: between Southfleet Junction and St Pancras International Station; including new International Stations at Ebbsfleet and Stratford, and with connections to the existing East Coast Main Line, North London Line, West Coast Main Line (via North London Line), North Kent Line, Ripple Lane freight yard and a new maintenance depot situated at Temple Mills. The new railway is subject to the EC Directive 96/48/EC of 23rd July 2003 regarding the interoperability of the European TENS routes and the supporting Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSls). As a consequence it is mandatory under the Directive for the HS1 Infrastructure Manager (see §0.1) to provide a Register of Infrastructure (the Register) defining the main characteristics of the line. A Register was originally prepared to consider Section 1 of the HS1, which was brought into commercial service on the 28th September 2003. This document represents the Register for the second phase of the railway, Section 2 of the HS1, being brought into commercial service on 14th November 2007. Technical Files have been prepared relating to Section 2 of the HS1; these define the conformity of the new railway with the relevant TSls: ~ Infrastructure (INS) Subsystem (Reference 1) ~ Energy (ENE) Subsystem (Reference 2) ~ Control, Command and Signalling (CCS) Subsystem (Reference 3) - 5­ R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO HS1 Ltd HS1 (Section 2) Register of Infrastructure R-SG-NC-00002-17-HSO Revision 01, Date 15 July 2009 Page 6 of 90 The Register makes reference to the Infrastructure, Energy, and Control-Command and Signalling TSls regarding which characteristics, basic provisions or other information should be included. Any derogation that may apply is described. 0.1. Ownership of the Register The Register is compiled and owned by the Infrastructure Concession Holder of Section 2 of the HS1: HS1 Ltd 73 Collier Street LONDON N19BE It is however maintained and updated on behalf of the Infrastructure Owner by the Infrastructure Manager in accordance with a Railway Services Agreement. The address of the Infrastructure Manager is: Network Rail (CTRL) Ltd Singlewell Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (SIMD) Henhurst Road Cobham, Gravesend Kent DA123AN The first issue (revision 00) is dated 1ih August 2007, being issued within days of "authorisation to place into service" on 31 st July 2007 by the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR). The date of commencement of commercial service was 14th November 2007. The Register will be reviewed annually from the issue date given on the document coversheet, and amended as, and if, appropriate. This is the first revision of the Register to take note of changes since opening of Section 2 of the railway. 0.2. General Information As indicated in the TSls the Register shall allow: ~ the Member State responsible for granting authorisation
Recommended publications
  • Kent Rail Strategy 2021

    Kent Rail Strategy 2021

    Kent Rail Strategy 2021 Public Consultation Report January 2021 Kent Rail Strategy 2021 Consultation Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Consultation process................................................................................................................ 4 3. Consultation responses ............................................................................................................ 8 4. Kent Rail Strategy ambitions .................................................................................................. 10 5. Rail policy .............................................................................................................................. 15 6. Fares policy ........................................................................................................................... 20 7. Rail infrastructure enhancements ........................................................................................... 25 8. Rolling stock improvements ................................................................................................... 29 9. Passenger services ................................................................................................................ 33 10. Community Rail Partnerships (CRPs) ................................................................................. 37 11. Rail freight provision ..........................................................................................................
  • A CRITICAL EVALUATION of the LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD of the CHALK UPLANDS of NORTHWEST EUROPE Lesley

    A CRITICAL EVALUATION of the LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD of the CHALK UPLANDS of NORTHWEST EUROPE Lesley

    A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD OF THE CHALK UPLANDS OF NORTHWEST EUROPE The Chilterns, Pegsdon, Bedfordshire (photograph L. Blundell) Lesley Blundell UCL Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD September 2019 2 I, Lesley Blundell, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed: 3 4 Abstract Our understanding of early human behaviour has always been and continues to be predicated on an archaeological record unevenly distributed in space and time. More than 80% of British Lower-Middle Palaeolithic findspots were discovered during the late 19th/early 20th centuries, the majority from lowland fluvial contexts. Within the British planning process and some academic research, the resultant findspot distributions are taken at face value, with insufficient consideration of possible bias resulting from variables operating on their creation. This leads to areas of landscape outside the river valleys being considered to have only limited archaeological potential. This thesis was conceived as an attempt to analyse the findspot data of the Lower-Middle Palaeolithic record of the Chalk uplands of southeast Britain and northern France within a framework complex enough to allow bias in the formation of findspot distribution patterns and artefact preservation/discovery opportunities to be identified and scrutinised more closely. Taking a dynamic, landscape = record approach, this research explores the potential influence of geomorphology, 19th/early 20th century industrialisation and antiquarian collecting on the creation of the Lower- Middle Palaeolithic record through the opportunities created for artefact preservation and release.
  • Strategic Corridor Evidence Base

    Strategic Corridor Evidence Base

    Transport Strategy for the South East ___ Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Client: Transport for the South East 10 December 2019 Our ref: 234337 Contents Page 4 Introduction 4 Definitions 5 Sources and Presentation 6 Strategic Corridor maps Appendices SE South East Radial Corridors SC South Central Radial Corridors SW South West Radial Corridors IO Inner Orbital Corridors OO Outer Orbital Corridors 3 | 10 December 2019 Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Introduction Introduction Definitions Table 1 | Strategic Corridor definitions 1 This document presents the evidence base 5 There are 23 Strategic Corridors in South East Area Ref Corridor Name M2/A2/Chatham Main Line underpinning the case for investment in the South England. These corridors were identified by SE1 (Dartford – Dover) East’s Strategic Corridors. It has been prepared for Transport for the South East, its Constituent A299/Chatham Main Line SE2 Transport for the South East (TfSE) – the emerging Authorities, and other stakeholders involved in the South (Faversham – Ramsgate) East M20/A20/High Speed 1/South Eastern Main Line SE3 Sub-National Transport Body for South East England development of the Economic Connectivity Review. (Dover – Sidcup) A21/Hastings Line – in support of its development of a Transport Since this review was published, the corridors have SE5 (Hastings – Sevenoaks) A22/A264/Oxted Line Strategy for South East England. been grouped into five areas. Some of the definitions SC1 (Crawley – Eastbourne) and names of some corridors cited in the Economic South M23/A23/Brighton
  • Train Sim World 2 Southeastern High Speed Driver's Manual EN.Pdf

    Train Sim World 2 Southeastern High Speed Driver's Manual EN.Pdf

    EN SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED ©2021 Dovetail Games, a trading name of RailSimulator.com Limited (“DTG”). "Dovetail Games", “Train Sim World” and “SimuGraph” are trademarks or registered trademarks of DTG. Unreal® Engine, ©1998-2021, Epic Games, Inc. All rights reserved. Unreal® is a registered trademark of Epic Games. Portions of this software utilise SpeedTree® technology (©2014 Interactive Data Visualization, Inc.). SpeedTree® is a registered trademark of Interactive Data Visualization, Inc. All rights reserved. Southeastern is the registered trade mark of The Go-Ahead Group PLC. Permission to use the Double Arrow Trade Mark is granted by the Secretary of State for Transport. All other copyrights or trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used here with permission. Unauthorised copying, adaptation, rental, re-sale, arcade use, charging for use, broadcast, cable transmission, public performance, distribution or extraction of the product or any trademark or copyright work that forms part of this product is prohibited. Developed and published by DTG. CONTENTS 1 SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED OVERVIEW 5 TRAIN SAFETY & IN-CAB SIGNALLING SYSTEMS 5 INTRODUCING SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED 43 AUTOMATIC WARNING SYSTEM (AWS) 6 ROUTE MAP & POINTS OF INTEREST 44 TRAIN PROTECTION & WARNING SYSTEM (TPWS) 7 GAME MODES 45 KVB 2 THE BR CLASS 395 'JAVELIN' 47 TVM-430 8 INTRODUCING THE BR CLASS 395 'JAVELIN' 6 BRITISH RAILWAY SIGNALLING 9 BR CLASS 395 DRIVING CAB: FRONT 50 COLOUR LIGHT 10 BR CLASS 395 DRIVING CAB: REAR 56 SEMAPHORE 11 BR CLASS
  • Rail Devolution Business Case Narrative

    Rail Devolution Business Case Narrative

    Submission to HM Government Date: 14 October 2016 Title: Rail devolution business case narrative 1 Summary 1.1 The purpose of this paper is to set out the case for further transfer of responsibility for the provision of some rail passenger services from the Department for Transport (DfT) to the Mayor and Transport for London (TfL). Significant improvement in the quality of services for passengers 1.2 Further devolution of inner suburban rail services within London will deliver significant economic, financial and customer benefits by 2020 through: More reliable and better services for passengers, delivered through a concession contracting model where the provider of train services focuses purely on reliability and customer satisfaction TfL’s proven ability to work with Network Rail sharing resources between them and London Underground Seamless and integrated fares, ticketing, branding and information for passengers across public transport services in London, which not only encourages more people to use public transport, but also reduces fare evasion A greater ability to plan and deliver the cost effective provision of public transport and associated projects across all local services, including buses, walking and cycling 1.3 Taken together, one impact will be to generate additional demand and revenue. On the recently devolved West Anglia services this has increased 27 per cent since devolution in May 2015. TfL expects an increase of 14 per cent in southeast London. The additional revenue can itself be re-invested in service enhancements 1.4 The package has a quantified benefit cost ratio of 4.3 : 1, based on railway passenger benefits, which shows that this offers high value for money.
  • Application by London Resort Company Holdings Limited for an Order Granting Development Consent for the London Resort

    Application by London Resort Company Holdings Limited for an Order Granting Development Consent for the London Resort

    Application by London Resort Company Holdings Limited for an Order granting Development Consent for the London Resort Section 56 Planning Act 2008: Relevant representation on behalf of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited Planning Inspectorate Reference Number: BC080001 31 March 2021 KJES/SJA/115040.00407/77280086.5 Page 1 1 Background to this representation and Network Rail This representation 1.1 This is the full response of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail) to the section 56 notification. A summary of this response has been included in the Registration and Relevant Representation form. 1.2 Network Rail is continuing to review the application material, with the intention that further detail will be provided at the written representation stage. Network Rail 1.3 Network Rail is a statutory undertaker and owns, operates and maintains the majority of the rail infrastructure of Great Britain pursuant to its network licence. Under the terms of that licence Network Rail is under a duty to secure the operation, maintenance, renewal and enhancement of the network in order to satisfy the reasonable requirements of customers and funders. 1.4 Network Rail's network excludes the HS1 route and its stations, notably London St Pancras and Ebbsfleet. This is owned by HS1 Ltd, under a concession from the British government. Operation, maintenance and renewal of that route and stations are subcontracted to Network Rail (High Speed) Limited, a subsidiary of Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd. 1.5 Network Rail recognises the role that the rail network can play in supporting and facilitating sustainable visitor and staff movements to, and from, the London Resort (the Resort).
  • Lambeth Overground Stations Study Contents

    Lambeth Overground Stations Study Contents

    Feasibility Study for New Stations and Station Improvements on the Overground in Lambeth Final Report 4.0 Monday, 07 July 2014 Prepared for: LB Lambeth Prepared by: Steer Davies Gleave 28-32 Upper Ground London, SE1 9PD +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com 2 Lambeth Overground Stations Study Contents 3 4 Contents 1. Introduction and Scope 2. Strategic Transport Context ■ The study area and related projects ■ Current travel patterns ■ Policy considerations ■ Rail demand ■ Operational considerations 3. Existing Railway Stations ■ Current demand ■ Constraints and issues ■ Opportunities 4. New Stations ■ Brixton Overground Station ■ Loughborough Overground Junction 5. Funding Opportunities ■ Sources of Funding 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ■ Potential Investment Programme 5 6 1 1 2 3 4 5 Lambeth Overground Stations Study Section 1: Introduction 7 1 1 2 3 4 5 Introduction Introduction Steer Davies Gleave was commissioned by LB Lambeth in January 2014 to undertake a feasibility study for new stations and station improvements on the London Overground services in the London Borough of Lambeth. The primary aim of the study is to assess and The primary aim of the study is: review the case for building new stations at Brixton and Loughborough Junction and consider opportunities to improve Clapham High Street and Wandsworth Road stations and the existing Brixton and Loughborough Junction stations. to develop a case for building new stations at Study Scope Brixton and Loughborough Junction; The outputs of our study were to: Set out the strategic transport context – the public transport connections to Loughborough Junction, Brixton, Clapham High Street and and Wandsworth Road and the opportunities for strategic interchange at Loughborough Junction and Brixton.
  • Kent Rail Strategy 2021

    Kent Rail Strategy 2021

    Kent Rail Strategy 2021 County Hall, Maidstone March 2021 1 Contents Map of Kent Rail Network ……………………………………………………………… 3 Foreword by Roger Gough, Leader of Kent County Council ………………………. 4 Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………. 5 1. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………… 7 2. National Rail Policy …………………………………………………………….. 9 3. Kent’s Local Transport Policy …………………………………………………. 15 4. Key Drivers of Demand for Rail Services in Kent ………………..……….… 18 5. Rail Infrastructure Outputs Required in Kent ……………..……………….… 23 6. Rolling-Stock Outputs Required in Kent ……………………………………... 29 7. Rail Service Outcomes Required in Kent ……………………………………. 33 8. Passenger Communications and Station Facilities in Kent ………………... 43 9. Community Rail Partnerships in Kent ………………………………………... 46 10. Rail Freight Services in Kent …………………………………………..…….…50 11. International Rail Services in Kent ……………………………………………. 55 12. Conclusion …………………………………………………………………….… 58 Summary of Recommended Actions …………………………………………………. 60 Glossary of Railway Terminology……………………………………………………... 64 Sources ………………………………………………………………………………….. 66 Tables and Maps ……………………………………………………………………….. 67 Appendix A - Proposed Service Specifications ……………………………………… 68 Front cover image The new Class 800 series produced by Hitachi is one example of a new train design that could provide the bespoke additional fleet which will be required for Kent’s High Speed services. The picture shows a Class 800 train on a test run before entry into service. [source: Hitachi Ltd, 2015] 2 3 Foreword By the Leader of
  • 2021 HS1 NETWORK STATEMENT Dated Edition: 1 April 2021 HIGH SPEED 1 (HS1) HS1 LIMITED

    2021 HS1 NETWORK STATEMENT Dated Edition: 1 April 2021 HIGH SPEED 1 (HS1) HS1 LIMITED

    2021 HS1 NETWORK STATEMENT Dated Edition: 1 April 2021 HIGH SPEED 1 (HS1) HS1 LIMITED 1 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ACC Ashford Control Centre Access Agreement Framework Track Access Agreement, Track Access Agreement or Station Access Agreement (as applicable) AIC Additional Inspection Charge Applicant Any person that wants to apply for a train path including TOCs, shippers, freight forwarding agents and combined transport operators intending to employ a TOC to operate the train path on their behalf APC Magnets Automatic Power Control Magnets ATCS Automatic Train Control System AWS Automatic Warning System Access Proposal Any notification made by any Applicant for a Train Slot as provided under the HS1 Network Code Competent authority Any restriction of use taken by the Infrastructure Manager restriction of use pursuant to a direction or an agreement with any competent authority (a public authority of a Member State(s) which has the power to intervene in public passenger transport in a given geographical area) Concession Agreement The agreement made between the Secretary of State and the Infrastructure Manager granting the concession to the Infrastructure Manager for the operation and financing of HS1 and the repair, maintenance and replacement of HS1 DAPR Delay Attribution Principles & Rules DBC DB Cargo (UK) Limited Disruptive Event Any event or circumstance which materially prevents or materially disrupts the operation of trains on any part of HS1 in accordance with the relevant Working Timetable EIL Eurostar International Limited Engineering
  • Network Rail Long Term Planning Process

    Network Rail Long Term Planning Process

    Network Rail Long Term Planning Process Kent Route Study – Guidance Note Ashford Joint Transport Board - September 2015 Objectives The Long Term Planning Process (LTPP) is a new process for long term planning of the rail network and follows on from the Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) programme that was completed by Network Rail on behalf of the rail industry. The LTPP will build on the successes of the RUS programme but will look further into the future over the next 30 years so that the rail industry can plan now for the forecast growth in demand. The objectives of the LTPP are to: • Facilitate strategic planning of the rail network taking into account views of the rail industry, funders, specifiers and customers; • Develop options to meet future demand through market studies, cross- boundary analysis and route studies; • Consider views of local stakeholders and align with their strategic goals; • Recognise how the rail industry can support and drive economic growth; and • Fulfil Network Rail’s license obligations to plan the future capability of the network. Market Studies The market studies are the first part of the LTPP and commenced in April 2012. There are four market studies, three of which look at passenger services and one which looks at freight. They are: London and South East, Regional Urban, Long Distance and Freight market studies. The market studies have two key outputs, firstly to forecast future rail demand over the next 10 and 30 years, and secondly, to develop conditional outputs for future rail services which can support delivery of their strategic goals.
  • Southeastern Trains Map Pdf

    Southeastern Trains Map Pdf

    Southeastern trains map pdf Continue Routes encoded by three London terminals. The best experience from several routes to London. Offer the Priorat to be dumped from Dover as it was a long time since there was no Marine Corps, Harbor or City Station. London Bridge is completely open. With work on the redevelopment of London Bridge. Not 45o lines to the right of the map. It's a bad map type that makes something that's just on earth unrecognizable. Since when did Kent look like this - with a club leg? The map takes straight and straight south-east main lines (London - Tonbridge - Hastings and Tonbridge - Ashford - Dover) in a tangled few corners. Tonbridge - Dover line arrow straight (superb piece of engineering Cubitt) - why put four bends in it? Not only that, but it's so boring you can die of depression just by looking at it. Pointless headline. Buffers in London termini, but not elsewhere. Poor geographical relations between London terminals. Strange and gloomy flower-breeding - not typical (and two dark brown colors from Charing Cross). Lines do not intersect correctly, for example in Ebbsfleet. No statement on the choice of station (stations disappear along the north Kent coast). The routes are colored. Includes Thameslink to Bedford as a co-service. Poor presentation of Javelin's new fast services: unclear around Gravesend showing Eurostar passes; The North Kent lines stretched too far to the right making Javelin/Eurostar very indirect. The map below was added without a rethink. Some very small type there. You may not recognize this important route on this map.
  • Information Sheet 1 – Great Northern Metro

    Information Sheet 1 – Great Northern Metro

    Information sheet 1 – Great Northern Metro Burnham Market Wells-next-the-Sea SERVICES AND FACILITIES This is a general guide to the basic daily services. Hunstanton Not all trains stop at all stations on each coloured line, so please check the timetable. Dersingham Fakenham REGULAR LIMITED SERVICE SERVICE Sandringham Gatwick Express King’s Lynn Great Northern Southern Watlington Thameslink Wisbech Downham Market Other train operators may provide additional services along some of our routes. Other train operators’ routes Littleport Bus links to Yorkshire, the North East and Scotland Ely Faygate* Limited service stations on our network to Norwich Interchange stations and Ipswich Interchange with London Underground Peterborough Waterbeach Interchange with London Overground to the West Midlands, St. Ives to Newmarket Interchange with London Tramlink North West and Scotland to the East Midlands Huntingdon Cambridge and Ipswich and South Yorkshire Interchange with Eurostar to Stansted Airport Interchange with other operators’ train services St. Neots Foxton and London Bedford Interchange with Airports Milton Keynes Central Shepreth Ferry service routes Sandy Meldreth Flitwick Bletchley Biggleswade Royston Harlington Ashwell & Morden Arlesey Baldock Leighton Buzzard Leagrave Letchworth Garden City Hitchin Dunstable Luton Stevenage Tring Watton-at-Stone Luton Airport Parkway Luton Knebworth Airport Hertford North Welwyn North Harpenden Bayford Berkhamsted Welwyn Garden City Hatfield Cuffley St. Albans City Welham Green Crews Hill Hemel Hempstead Radlett Brookmans Park Gordon Hill Potters Bar Enfield Chase Watford Junction Elstree & Borehamwood Hadley Wood Grange Park New Barnet Mill Hill Broadway Winchmore Hill Oakleigh Park Palmers Green Harrow & Wealdstone Hendon New Southgate Bowes Park Cricklewood Alexandra Palace Hornsey Wembley Central West Hampstead Thameslink Harringay Finsbury Park Kentish Town Drayton Park Highbury & Islington Shepherd’s Bush London London Essex Road St.