International System Summary: UNITED KINGDOM

UIC Map of the United Kingdom’s High-Speed Rail Lines

The United Kingdom (UK) is located on an island in GDP of $2.25 trillion, and the GDP per capita of $35,900 Western Europe off the coast of France and Belgium. The ranks 34th in the world. Slightly more than 110 km (70 country’s population of 63 million people ranks 22nd in miles) of high-speed rail line exists in the UK currently, the world. The capital, London, has a population of 8.6 with an additional 200 km (125 miles) planned for future million, with Birmingham the second largest city with 2.3 development. The above map displays the United King- million. Overall, the country is considered mostly urban dom’s high-speed rail network according to the Interna- in nature, with 80 percent of the population residing in tional Union of Railways (UIC). urban areas. The UK has the 9th largest economy with a

INTERNATIONAL HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM SUMMARY: UNITED KINGDOM | 1 Sy stem Description and History High-speed rail operations in the UK goes back to 1976, when British Railways commenced operations with a die- sel-electric multiple unit train capable of over 200 km/h (125 mph). Amos et al. (2010) indicates this was the first service capable of those speeds after Japan had implement- ed their high-speed services. Modern high-speed service in the UK began when Section 1 of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL), now known as High Speed 1 (HS1), opened in 2003 between the Channel Tunnel and Fawkham Junc- tion (south of London). The Channel Tunnel opened in 1994 with the service between the tunnel and London op- Eurostar on the HS1 (the Channel Tunnel rail link) erating on conventional passenger rail line. The new high- speed link reduced the travel time by 20 minutes. The E conomics and Finance HS1 segment provides direct international high-speed rail The construction and operation of the Channel Tunnel service to Paris and Brussels through the Channel Tunnel. Rail Link (now HS1) between the Channel Tunnel and The new link, Section 2, that opened in 2007 fully connects London has a history of private investment, financial diffi- between the Channel Tunnel and London, further reduc- culties, and reorganization. Ernst & Young (2009) provide ing the travel time by an additional 20 minutes. a bulleted list of the history of the HS1 line: • The design, build, finance, and operate concession Prior to the completion of the high-speed link into Lon- contract for the CTRL, the largest of the UK’s private don, the high-speed trains used the Waterloo station, but finance initiative (PFI) projects at the time, was award- upon completion of the Southfleet Junction–London link, ed to London & Continental Railway Limited (LCR) the high-speed trains transferred to the St Pancras Inter- in 1996 and was originally supposed to last until 2086. national station, located in central London. The UK is The brand name HS1 was adopted in 2006. currently planning for the construction of a High Speed 2 • The line was originally planned to be constructed as (HS2) project to connect London with Birmingham with a single project, however, after running into financial high-speed train service in the first section. Additional difficulties in 1998, the CTRL project was restructured sections are under review to extend HS2 in a ‘Y’ configu- and divided into two sections: ration from Birmingham on to Manchester and to Leeds o Section 1 runs 46 miles from the Channel Tunnel (See map on following page). The following table provides portal to Fawkham Junction and cost £1.9 billion. the details of the current and planned high-speed line seg- Section 1 was opened to passenger traffic on time in ments in the UK, which if fully implemented according to 2003 and on budget. table would place over 300 km (almost 200 miles) of high- o Section 2 completed the rail link, feeding a 24-mile speed lines in the UK. HSR from the Southfleet Junction into central Lon- don’s St Pancras Station. It was opened on time and UIC Table of the United Kingdom’s High-Speed Rail Lines on budget in 2007 at a cost of £3.3 billion. Speed Year Length Stage • As part of the 1998 rescue plan it was agreed that, fol- km/h mph Opened km miles In Operation: lowing completion, Section 1 would be purchased by Fawkham Junction – Railtrack, along with an option to purchase Section 2. 300 185 2003 74 46 Tunnel In return, Railtrack committed to operate the whole London – Southfleet 300 185 2007 39 24 route as well as St Pancras railway station that, unlike Junction all other former British Rail stations, was transferred TOTAL 113 70 to LCR/Union Railways in 1996. Planned: • In 2001, Railtrack announced that, due to financial London – Birmingham 360 225 2025 204 127 (HS2, first section) problems, it would not purchase Section 2 once it was GRAND TOTAL 317 197 complete. This triggered a second restructuring. The 2002 restructuring plan agreed that the two sections Sources: High Speed and the City; High-Speed Rail: The Fast would have different infrastructure owners (Railtrack Track to Economic Development; High-Speed Lines in the for Section 1, LCR for Section 2) but with common World management by Railtrack.

2 | INTERNATIONAL HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM SUMMARY: UNITED KINGDOM HS2 Network Map with Travel Time Savings To and From London by Train

• Following yet further financial problems at Railtrack, tor to HS1 Ltd. for maintaining and operating the railway its interest in the CTRL was sold back to LCR, who infrastructure and three stations: St Pancras International, then sold the operating rights for the completed line Stratford International, and Ebbsfleet International. Euro- to Network Rail, Railtrack’s successor. Under this ar- star is the international train operator and maintains and rangement LCR became the sole owner of both sec- operates the Ashford International Station. Southeastern tions of the CTRL and the St Pancras property, as per provides domestic high-speed rail service along the line the original 1996 plan. between London and Ashford. According to a California High-Speed Rail Authority re- view of international case studies (2011), following a sale High Speed 2 (HS2): Further UK High-Speed Rail process completed in 2010, a new company named HS1 Development Limited (HS1 Ltd.) became the infrastructure operator In January 2009 the Department of Transport formed a and holds the concession to operate, manage, and main- company named HS2 Limited (HS2 Ltd.) to develop plans tain the HS1 high-speed railway infrastructure until 2040. for a new high-speed network between London and Bir- HS1 Ltd. is jointly owned by Borealis Infrastructure and mingham. HS2 Ltd. submitted plans to achieve this con- Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, two Canadian pension nection, and in January 2012 the UK government ap- funds. They further state that Network Rail is a contrac- proved the recommended route between London and

INTERNATIONAL HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM SUMMARY: UNITED KINGDOM | 3 Eurostar at St Pancras railway station

Birmingham. This approved 140-mile segment represents London High-Speed Train Stations Section 1 of the HS2 project. Future plans have the high- The UIC report High Speed and the City documents how speed network connecting to Heathrow International high-speed rail stations relate to city planning and devel- Airport and extending from Birmingham into two seg- opment through a series of case studies. One of the case ments: one to Manchester and the other to Leeds (see the studies examined is London. The London metropolitan map on the previous page). Altogether, the complete ‘Y’ area population is approximately 14 million people, with high-speed rail network extending north of London will the city itself having an estimated population of 7.5 million be around 330 miles in length. Operating at speeds up to people. The population density within the city is calculat- 225 mph, HS2, Ltd. estimates that as many as 4.5 million ed as 4,761 people per square kilometer (12,411 people per air trips and 9 million road trips a year will shift onto rail square mile). For comparison, other city densities include with the ‘Y’ network in place. The government time-line Paris with 1,971 people per square kilometer (5,138 people lists the opening for service along the first section as 2026 per square mile) and Tokyo with a density of 14,254 people and the following segments as 2032-33. per square kilometer (37,158 people per square mile).

Sources: High Speed 2: International Case Studies on Deliv- With the opening of Section 2 of HS1 in November 2007, ery and Financing – A Report for HS2; California High-Speed St Pancras International became the high-speed rail sta- Rail Project: International Case Studies; “High Speed Rail”; tion in London. This new route into the city reduced “Key HS2 Facts”; “High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Fu- the travel time by 20 minutes, compared to the previous ture”; The Government’s Decision; Consultation Summary route into London using conventional rail lines, and put the service in a more central location with many connec- Rrh ide s ip and Transportation System Impacts tions. The St Pancras International station is connected to Travel times were greatly reduced with the opening of the 6 London Underground (subway) stations, with more than HS1 line, with traveling from London to Paris now taking 200 Underground stations reached directly without trans- slightly more than 2 hours and to Brussels in slightly less fer. Renovated during the 2000s, the case study indicates than 2 hours. The UIC reports that 9.2 million riders uti- that the St Pancras station is the engine of two huge urban lized the Eurostar international high-speed service along renewal and development programs in the King’s Cross the HS1 route. Amos et al. (2010) reports that a Eurostar Area, which will transform the area into a new business, survey found that 25–30 percent of the London-Paris rid- residential, and cultural district. ership consisted of generated trips, that is, trips that would not have occurred without the service.

4 | INTERNATIONAL HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM SUMMARY: UNITED KINGDOM Eurostar on the HS1 (the Channel Tunnel rail link), Britain’s first high-speed line

Eurostar operates the international high-speed services to UIC London St Pancras to Ashford Modal Comparison Lille, Paris, Brussels, Disneyland, and the South of France. Travel Mode Travel Time Travel Fares Beginning in December 2009, domestic high-speed ser- High-Speed Train 40 min 30 Euro ($38) vice along HS1 tracks has been provided by Southeastern Conventional Train – – to the Ashford and Ebbsfleet International stations. The Car 1 hr 10 min 20 Euro ($25) case study documents 60 daily high speed services (both departure origins and arrivals) at St Pancras International. Plane – – As part of the case studies, the UIC provides a modal com- parison between the focal station and first city. In this case high speed services (both departure origins and arrivals) the comparison is between London and Ashford. The fol- occur between London and Ashford. lowing chart provides the estimated travel times and travel cost for the different modes of travel. High-speed train Sources: High-Speed Rail: The Fast Track to Economic De- service covers the distance in 40 minutes compared to car velopment?; Table 50 – Revenue-Earning HS Traffic; High in 1 hour 10 minutes. The case study indicates 34 daily Speed and the City;

Bi bliography California High-Speed Rail Project: International Case Studies Prepared by the California High-Speed Rail Authority, October 2011 URL: http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/assets/0/152/302/321/dd9040b5-8ef3-4df8-82b5-a204481ba5dd.pdf Date Accessed: August 8, 2012

Consultation Summary Department of Transport, February 2011 URL: http://highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/sites/highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/files/hsr-consultation-summary.pdf Date Accessed: October 30, 2012

INTERNATIONAL HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM SUMMARY: UNITED KINGDOM | 5 High Speed and the City Prepared for the International Union of Railways (UIC) by BB&J Consult, September 2010 URL: http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/20101117_highspeed_thecity_finalreport.pdf Date Accessed: June 20, 2012

High-Speed Lines in the World International Union of Railways (UIC), Updated November 1, 2011 URL: http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/20111101_a1_high_speed_lines_in_the_world.pdf Date Accessed: May 30, 2012

“High Speed Rail” Written Statement by the Rt. Hon. Justine Greening MP, Secretary of State for Transport, Department of Transport, January 10, 2012 URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/high-speed-rail--30 Date Accessed: November 21, 2012

“High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future” Department of Transport URL: http://highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/ Date Accessed: November 21, 2012

High-Speed Rail: The Fast Track to Economic Development? Prepared by Amos, Bullock and Sondhi with The World Bank, July 2010 URL: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2010/07/26/000334955_2010072603 2714/Rendered/PDF/558560WP0Box341SR1v08121jul101final.pdf Date Accessed: May 29, 2012.

High Speed 2: International Case Studies on Delivery and Financing – A Report for HS2 Ernst & Young, December 2009 URL: http://www.chippingwarden.org/hs2documents/casestudies.pdf Date Accessed: May 30, 2012

“Key HS2 Facts” High Speed Two (HS2) Limited URL: http://www.hs2.org.uk/key-facts Date Accessed: November 21, 2012

Table 50 – Revenue-Earning HS Traffic International Union of Railways (UIC), 2009 URL: http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/201101_hs_traffic__tab_50_-_2009.pdf Date Accessed: May 31, 2012

The Government’s Decision Department of Transport, January 2012 URL: http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2-governments-decisions/hs2-governments-decisions.pdf Date Accessed: October 30, 2012

The World Factbook United States Central Intelligence Agency URL: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ Date Accessed: May 31, 2012

6 | INTERNATIONAL HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM SUMMARY: UNITED KINGDOM