Southeastern Trains Map Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Southeastern Trains Map Pdf Southeastern trains map pdf Continue Routes encoded by three London terminals. The best experience from several routes to London. Offer the Priorat to be dumped from Dover as it was a long time since there was no Marine Corps, Harbor or City Station. London Bridge is completely open. With work on the redevelopment of London Bridge. Not 45o lines to the right of the map. It's a bad map type that makes something that's just on earth unrecognizable. Since when did Kent look like this - with a club leg? The map takes straight and straight south-east main lines (London - Tonbridge - Hastings and Tonbridge - Ashford - Dover) in a tangled few corners. Tonbridge - Dover line arrow straight (superb piece of engineering Cubitt) - why put four bends in it? Not only that, but it's so boring you can die of depression just by looking at it. Pointless headline. Buffers in London termini, but not elsewhere. Poor geographical relations between London terminals. Strange and gloomy flower-breeding - not typical (and two dark brown colors from Charing Cross). Lines do not intersect correctly, for example in Ebbsfleet. No statement on the choice of station (stations disappear along the north Kent coast). The routes are colored. Includes Thameslink to Bedford as a co-service. Poor presentation of Javelin's new fast services: unclear around Gravesend showing Eurostar passes; The North Kent lines stretched too far to the right making Javelin/Eurostar very indirect. The map below was added without a rethink. Some very small type there. You may not recognize this important route on this map. Ok, it may need spinning through 90o, but why bend both sides of Ashford on that straight line? And why kick on Ramsgate (should be the other way, if anything) when not applied to the London termini? Another example is to make something simple more complicated. Victoria east of Charing Cross? South East Main LineNorth Electric Multiple Units at Charing Cross StationOverviewStatusOperationalOwnerWork RailLocaleGreager LondonSouth East AngthTherminiLondon Charing Cross London Cannon PrioryServiceCommType Rail, Heavy RailSystemNational RailOperator (s)SoutheasternRolling StockClassClass 375 ElectrostarClass 395 JavelinClass 465 Network Class 466 NetworkHistoryThe Open1842-44 phased TechnicalNumber Tracks5 (via Hangerford Bridge)4 (Charing Cross Borough Market)2 (Borough Market-London Bridge)12 (London Bridge-Bermondsey Split-in) that Brighton Lines)5 to 6 (Bermondsey split-new cross)4 (New Cross-Orpington)2 (Orpington-Dover)Track track track1,435 mm (4ft 8 1⁄2 in) standard gaugeElectrification750 v DC third rail2 5 kV 50 Hz AC OHLE (Ashford)Operating speed100mph (161 km/h) maximum route map (Click to expand) Waterloo East Thameslink London Blackfriars London Cannon Street London Bridge River Thames South London line on the south London line East London line East London Greenwich Line New Cross Gate New Cross Brighton main line Tanners Hill Flydown St. John's Greenwich Park branch line Nunhead Docklands Railway Light Lewisham Mid-Kent Line Dartford Loop Line Grove Park Bromley North Line Elmstead Woods Chislehurst Chatham main line Chislehurst Junction Petts Wood Orpington Chelsfield Knockholt Danton Green Swanley Sevenoaks Hildenborough Redhill-Tonbridge Line Tonbridge Hastings Line Paddock Wood Medway Valley Marden Staplehurst Headkorn Pluckley High Speed 1 Maidstone Line Ashford International Line Marshlink Ashford Ramsgate Line Westenhanger High Speed 1 Sandling Dollends Moor Freight Yard Folkestone West to the Folkestone Central Dover Priorate Kent Coast line The Main Line Detailed Line Chart can be found on the southeast main line , The UK, one of the two main routes crossing Kent, runs through Sevenoaks, Tonbridge, Ashford and Folkestone to Dover. The other route is Chatham's main line, which runs along Kent's north coast to Ramsgate and Dover via Chatham. History Building See also: The Redhill-Tonbridge rail line in the south-east that was built, allowed or under construction by 1840 line was built on the South East Railway (SER), which was in competition with London, Chatham and Dover Railway (LCDR), hence the duplication of routes in Kent. The original main line was authorized by the Parliamentary Act in 1836. The route, which was first allowed, was from London Bridge via Oxted, Tunbridge, Maidstone, Ashford and Folkestone. The route was to use the existing routes of the London and Croydon railways, as well as the railway tracks of London and Greenwich. SER was not a company that had a large amount of capital to save. As a cost-cutting measure, permission was secured in 1837 to make connection with the London and Croydon Railways in Norwood, Surrey. Instead of in Corbett's alley. However, the London and Brighton Railways were allowed to build from Norwood to the south in 1847. Parliament proposed further savings, avoiding the line, passing in parallel valleys for 12 miles (19 km), could make its connection further south. London and Brighton were to build the line, and SER had to purchase it at cost upon completion. Both companies will operate trains along the route. London and Brighton took advantage of this to ensure that gradients stored as small as possible, even through substantial excavation work and a mile-long tunnel at Merstem. The main SER line has deviated from London and Brighton Brighton at the Reigate junction, which London and Brighton opened to traffic on July 12, 1841. Viaduct over Foord Gap Leaving Brighton Line, Beeline has been made for Folkestone, planning to serve Maidstone having been abandoned. Instead, a branch was to be built from Maidstone Road. The line was almost straight between the two points, not changing by more than 0.5 miles (800 m) in either direction between Redhill and Ashford. The engineer was Sir William Cubitt. To facilitate quick work, Tunbridge, Maidstone Road and Ashford stations were built using roads. Headcorn station was to be rebuilt according to a similar plan in 1924. Construction began in November 1837 from Reigate Junction to the east and in both directions from Tunbridge. The line from London Bridge to Tunbridge opened on 26 May 1842. The line between Tonbridge and Ashford opened on 1 December 1842. No major engineering work was needed until Folkestone was reached, where a 100ft (30m) tall viaduct was needed to cross the Foord Gap. A temporary station was provided in Folkestone, which opened on 28 June 1843. With the completion of the viaduct, Folkestone Station opened on 18 December 1843. East of Folkestone, the hard ridge was bored through the Martello Tunnel, which took its name from the nearby Martello Tower. There were three capes between Folkestone and Dover: Abbott Rock, Round Rock and Shakespeare Rock. The first and last ones were from sound chalk, but the chalk round Down Cliff was of a different nature, being deemed unstable. Cubitt sought advice from Lieutenant Hutchinson, RE, who had experience using dynamite in clearing the wreck of HMS Royal George in 1840. It was decided to blow up the rock at a distance of 500 feet (150 m). On January 18, 1843, a total of 18,500 pounds (8,400 kg) of gunpowder was used in three charges to blow off the face of the rock. An estimated 1,000,000 tons of chalk have been dislodged. Because the chalk in Shakespeare's rock was not as strong as the Abbey Rock, two single-century tunnels were boring. To the east of the Shakespeare Tunnel, a low overpass bridge was built across the beach to gain access to Dover. The line between Folkestone and Dover opened on 7 February 1844. In 1843, permission was obtained to build a branch from Paddock Wood to Maidstone. It opened on September 25, 1844. In May 1844, permission was granted for the construction of a railway from Ashford to Tenet Island, serving both Margate and Ramsgate. The line opened until Canterbury on February 6, 1846. In 1845, permission was obtained to build a branch to Tunbridge Wells. This line opened on September 19, 1845. It was later extended to Hastings, East Sussex in 1852. In addition, in the same year, permission was obtained to build a railway from Ashford to Hastings, which opened 13 In 1851, Tunbridge Station was renamed Tunbridge Junction on 1 February 1852. Both Dover and Folkestone provided access to the English Channel, and thus the French ports of Calais and Boulogne. In Folkestone, a small creek, having flowed through Foord Gap, was constructed by pebbles in Folkestone, which acted as surface water and provided anchorage. SER has built a steeply-graded line branch to the harbor, with the reversal needed to achieve it. It opened for transportation in 1843. Passengers were transported from Folkestone station to the harbour by bus, post office and goods other by rail. A swing bridge was built in 1847 and folkton Harbour Station opened in 1850. The ships were able to berth in any state of the tide. SER has launched a cross-channel steamer in Boulogne. In Dover, the River Dour formed a pebble and thus a small harbour that required constant dredging to keep open. Cross-channel traffic operated by Admiralty ships in Calais. SER bought Dover Harbour in 1843. No French port was connected by rail at the time. SER partially financed the construction of the Boulogne and Amiens Railway, which opened in 1848. Calais was reached by rail this year. Large and large ships were built for cross-channel maintenance, so they could only use Folkestone Harbour during high tide in the 1860s, while the pier was expanded. Trains connecting to cross-border vessels are thus operated according to the state of the tide, not on a fixed schedule. This was a factor in the serious accident at Staplehurst on June 9, 1865. The development of Dover Harbour was largely out of the hands of the SER.
Recommended publications
  • Response to the Consultation Document
    RESPONSE TO THE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT: “A new approach to rail passenger services in London and the South East” Introduction 1. This response from concentrates on matters affecting the users of the four stations on the Greenwich line (Deptford, Greenwich, Maze Hill, and Westcombe Park). We do not comment on matters that only affect other areas of London and the South East. 2. Our response also takes account of the announcement made on 21 January 2016 that responsibility “for inner London rail services that operate wholly or mainly within Greater London” will transfer to TfL. The precise services or geographical area are not specified, but, for the purposes of our response about services on this line, we have assumed it includes all our trains except for a few peak hour services that extend beyond Dartford 3. Latest ORR figures of estimated station usage show that, in 2014/15, there were 7.1m users of these four stations, an increase of 5.5% over the previous year. This number will certainly continue to rise as a result of large housing developments in the Greenwich and Deptford area. Since 2014, 7,080 new homes have either been built, or are being built, in the vicinity of at least one of the four stations. A further 15,000 are planned for North Greenwich which will impact on Maze Hill and Westcombe Park. Greenwich is a major tourist destination for London and home to the University of Greenwich and Trinity/Laban and other educational establishments, with over 38,000 students. The proposed cruise liner terminal at Enderby’s wharf will also add pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and the Channel Tunnel
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society \\N& / / \X // A / d ^§r ASHFORD f\ s^ >\V I Farthingloe Farm f XpO©? / Construction ^Jt > / J camp s*\s*s%2r ^.jg£z Ashford Terminal \. "^>^—""'** ^^00-Shakespeare Zliff ^—«^^ —-•-^~~Z£Z^'^ Platform j^^. Tumuli} \ * A ^" \ FolkestoneTerminal.. «/-^v\ A^/X^-^U^ ^>*iBB=T 1~^ ^==^^2^^^^^^)^:^^^^^W5£yroA/ / AjJ/w^ Dolland's Moor ( S^^s/^^^^t^^/V^ , / 1 ,t>/a//7 7 ( ' 7y^y&.J Ur \ / \ ^ j (_J? J^S ^^^FOLKESTONE j \ y ^ ^^^^hYTHE 0 1 5 mites \V 0 1 5 kilometres Fig. 1. Location of the Ashford, Folkestone and Dover construction areas. ARCHAEOLOGY A N D T H E C H A N N E L T U N N E L PAUL BENNETT with contributions from Rupert Austin, Greg Campbell, Richard Cross, Alex Gibson, Elizabeth Healey, Martin Leyland, Steve Ouditt, Richard Preece, Jonathan Rady and Steve Staines INTRODUCTION Three separate construction areas have received attention from the Canterbury Archaeological Trust: Ashford, where the inland freight clearance depot has been built; Dover, where a construction camp, offices, working areas and a shaft leading down to the tunnel have been constructed; and Folkestone, where the main U.K. terminal facilities, the tunnel portals and a length of 'cut-and-cover' tunnel are presently under construction. Negotiations with Eurotunnel for archaeological work connected with this, the largest ever privately-funded civil engineering venture in Europe, began at an early stage in the life of the project. A document containing all known information regarding sites of archaeological interest was prepared by English Heritage (November 1986)1 and these designated areas were assessed in the field during July and August 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • Railways List
    A guide and list to a collection of Historic Railway Documents www.railarchive.org.uk to e mail click here December 2017 1 Since July 1971, this private collection of printed railway documents from pre grouping and pre nationalisation railway companies based in the UK; has sought to expand it‟s collection with the aim of obtaining a printed sample from each independent railway company which operated (or obtained it‟s act of parliament and started construction). There were over 1,500 such companies and to date the Rail Archive has sourced samples from over 800 of these companies. Early in 2001 the collection needed to be assessed for insurance purposes to identify a suitable premium. The premium cost was significant enough to warrant a more secure and sustainable future for the collection. In 2002 The Rail Archive was set up with the following objectives: secure an on-going future for the collection in a public institution reduce the insurance premium continue to add to the collection add a private collection of railway photographs from 1970‟s onwards provide a public access facility promote the collection ensure that the collection remains together in perpetuity where practical ensure that sufficient finances were in place to achieve to above objectives The archive is now retained by The Bodleian Library in Oxford to deliver the above objectives. This guide which gives details of paperwork in the collection and a list of railway companies from which material is wanted. The aim is to collect an item of printed paperwork from each UK railway company ever opened.
    [Show full text]
  • A CRITICAL EVALUATION of the LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD of the CHALK UPLANDS of NORTHWEST EUROPE Lesley
    A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD OF THE CHALK UPLANDS OF NORTHWEST EUROPE The Chilterns, Pegsdon, Bedfordshire (photograph L. Blundell) Lesley Blundell UCL Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD September 2019 2 I, Lesley Blundell, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed: 3 4 Abstract Our understanding of early human behaviour has always been and continues to be predicated on an archaeological record unevenly distributed in space and time. More than 80% of British Lower-Middle Palaeolithic findspots were discovered during the late 19th/early 20th centuries, the majority from lowland fluvial contexts. Within the British planning process and some academic research, the resultant findspot distributions are taken at face value, with insufficient consideration of possible bias resulting from variables operating on their creation. This leads to areas of landscape outside the river valleys being considered to have only limited archaeological potential. This thesis was conceived as an attempt to analyse the findspot data of the Lower-Middle Palaeolithic record of the Chalk uplands of southeast Britain and northern France within a framework complex enough to allow bias in the formation of findspot distribution patterns and artefact preservation/discovery opportunities to be identified and scrutinised more closely. Taking a dynamic, landscape = record approach, this research explores the potential influence of geomorphology, 19th/early 20th century industrialisation and antiquarian collecting on the creation of the Lower- Middle Palaeolithic record through the opportunities created for artefact preservation and release.
    [Show full text]
  • Glyne Gap – Operational Assessment (Pdf)
    Proposed new passenger station at Glyne Gap, Bexhill Technical note – Stage 3b: Operational assessment March 2013 Rother District Council, East Sussex County Council, Land Securities Group PLC Confidential Proposed311776 ITD newITN passenger1 A Document5 station at Glyne Gap,5 October Bexhill 2012 Technical note – Stage 3b: Operational assessment March 2013 Rother District Council, East Sussex County Council, Land Securities Group PLC Confidential Rother District Council, Town Hall, Bexhill-on-Sea TN39 3JX Mott MacDonald, Spring Bank House, 33 Stamford Street, Altrincham, Cheshire WA14 1ES, United Kingdom T +44(0) 161 926 4000 F +44(0) 161 926 4100, W www.mottmac.com Proposed new passenger station at Glyne Gap, Bexhill Confidential Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 26 Nov 2012 MCS KP RJF Draft technical note summarising operational issues surrounding Glyne Gap station B 28 March 2013 MCS/KP KP/RJF RJF Final version with client comments addressed This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which used for any other purpose. is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations
    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Problems of the North Downs Trackway in Kent
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society SOME PROBLEMS OF THE NORTH DOWNS TRACKWAY IN KENT By REV. H. W. R. Liman, S.J., M.A.(0xon.) THE importance of this pre-historic route from the Continent to the ancient habitat of man in Wiltshire has long been recognized. In the Surrey Archceological Collections of 1964 will be found an attempted re-appraisal of its route through the county of Surrey. Although the problems connected with its passage through Kent are fewer owing to its being better preserved, there are some points which I think still deserve attention—the three river crossings of the Darenth, the Medway and the Stour; the crossing of the Elham valley; and the passage to Canterbury of the branch route from Eastwell Park, known as the Pilgrims' Way. It may be worth while, before dealing with the actual crossings, to note a few general characteristics. Mr. I. D. Margary—our most eminent authority on ancient roads in Britain—has pointed out the dual nature of this trackway. It com- prises a Ridgeway and a Terraceway. The first runs along the crest of the escarpment. The second runs parallel to it, usually at the point below the escarpment where the slope flattens out into cultivation. In Kent for the most part the Terraceway has survived more effectually than the Ridgeway. It is for much of its length used as a modern road, marked by the familiar sign 'Pilgrims' Way'. Except at its eastern terminus the Ridgeway has not been so lucky, although it can be traced fairly accurately by those who take the trouble to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Accessibility Guide Class 395 (Javelin) Free Wifi
    Train Accessibility Guide Class 395 (Javelin) Free WiFi Stock routes: High speed to St Pancras and the High speed rounder • On Board Managers to provide assistance • Colour contrasting fittings • Accessible areas marked by orange • Priority seating above door • Tactile surfaces • Portable ramps for enabling wheelchair/ • Door operation warning sound scooter access. Dimensions of wheelchair/ and light scooter not to exceed 1200mm (48”) in length, • Braille and tactile signage 700mm(28”) wide and 1350mm (53.5”) tall. • One wheelchair accessible toilet and There is a combined weight restriction of 300kg one closet toilet in each 6-car unit • Automatic aural and visual passenger • Wide doorways with sliding doors information displays within each coach • Two wheelchair spaces with low level passenger communication equipment Class 375 (Electrostar) Free WiFi Stock routes: Hastings Line via Tonbridge Chatham Mainline Sittingbourne to Sheerness Medway Valley Line Tonbridge to Strood Maidstone East Line from Canterbury West • Conductors on board to provide assistance information displays within each coach Kent Mainline • Accessible areas marked by burgundy • Two wheelchair spaces with low level from Ramsgate and Dover above door passenger communication equipment • Portable ramps for enabling wheelchair/ • Colour contrasting fittings scooter access. Dimensions of wheelchair/ • Priority seating scooter not to exceed 1200mm (48”) in • Tactile surfaces length, 700mm(28”) wide and 1350mm • Door operation warning sound and light (53.5”) tall. There is
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Corridor Evidence Base
    Transport Strategy for the South East ___ Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Client: Transport for the South East 10 December 2019 Our ref: 234337 Contents Page 4 Introduction 4 Definitions 5 Sources and Presentation 6 Strategic Corridor maps Appendices SE South East Radial Corridors SC South Central Radial Corridors SW South West Radial Corridors IO Inner Orbital Corridors OO Outer Orbital Corridors 3 | 10 December 2019 Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Introduction Introduction Definitions Table 1 | Strategic Corridor definitions 1 This document presents the evidence base 5 There are 23 Strategic Corridors in South East Area Ref Corridor Name M2/A2/Chatham Main Line underpinning the case for investment in the South England. These corridors were identified by SE1 (Dartford – Dover) East’s Strategic Corridors. It has been prepared for Transport for the South East, its Constituent A299/Chatham Main Line SE2 Transport for the South East (TfSE) – the emerging Authorities, and other stakeholders involved in the South (Faversham – Ramsgate) East M20/A20/High Speed 1/South Eastern Main Line SE3 Sub-National Transport Body for South East England development of the Economic Connectivity Review. (Dover – Sidcup) A21/Hastings Line – in support of its development of a Transport Since this review was published, the corridors have SE5 (Hastings – Sevenoaks) A22/A264/Oxted Line Strategy for South East England. been grouped into five areas. Some of the definitions SC1 (Crawley – Eastbourne) and names of some corridors cited in the Economic South M23/A23/Brighton
    [Show full text]
  • The Lyminge Newsletter
    THE LYMINGE NEWSLETTER For the communities of LYMINGE, ETCHINGHILL, RHODES MINNIS and POSTLING http://www.lyminge.org.uk/ Produced by July 2011 THE LYMINGE ASSOCIATION LYMINGE ASSOCIATION NEWS Garden Safari WELL? Didn’t you all do well? A BIG cheer and thank-­‐you to the generous residents who opened their enchanting gardens to us over the weekend and of course to the helpers at Tayne Centre, hmm – ‘sausage in a bun’. The Churches triumphed with dazzling and very imaginative flower displays and the quilts in Parish Church were like blossoms in themselves. This year there were more gardens, more visitors and we again managed to raise some money for the parish and also for lots of charities. Editorial Changes I am sure I speak for us all in passing on our heartfelt thanks and good wishes to Jean Howard. Jean, who has been Editor of Lyminge Newsletter for many years, has decided to retire. She has handed over a vibrant, busy and very successful publication without which many of us would be lost. So, THANK YOU Jean! The Queen’s Diamond Jubilee Do you remember the Millennium celebrations in the Village Hall on 31st December 1999 ? We are hoping to produce another Audio-­‐Visual presentation to celebrate the Jubilee. We need pictures or memories of what has happened in Lyminge over the past 60 years ? Can you help us ? If you think that you might be able to help please contact Adrian on 862699 as soon you can ! We also need old photographs of Lyminge over the past 60 years for our Lyminge 2012 Calendar.
    [Show full text]
  • Faversham Conservation Area Character Appraisal (Extract from Report to Planning Committee 9 September 2004 (Agenda Item 1.1, Annex B.)
    Faversham conservation area character appraisal (Extract from report to Planning Committee 9 September 2004 (Agenda item 1.1, Annex B.) Chapter 1: General Introduction Location and geology 1.1. Faversham is situated towards the eastern end of the Borough of Swale at the head of a narrow tidal creek flowing north into The Swale waterway. The town of Sittingbourne lies some 11 kilometres to the west, whilst Canterbury lies some 14.5 kilometres to the south east. At Faversham low interfluves of Thanet Sands with brickearth are separated by shallow valleys that have been cut down through the chalk. The town centre is sited on a ridge of chalk overlain with brickearth; it then extends west into a valley where springs emerging from the chalk feed into the creek. To the south of the town is the gently rising dip slope of the North Downs, whilst the extensive alluvial flats of the Swale marshes lie to the north. History 1.2. From a very early date the small, but navigable, waterway made the higher ground at its southern end an ideal place for settlement which, the evidence suggests, happened in pre- Roman times. Archaeological finds have confirmed that later, in Roman times, a small roadside settlement existed at Ospringe and that a series of villa estates prospered in the agricultural lands between Watling Street and the Swale. However, firm proof of a settlement on the site of the present town centre has yet to emerge. 1.3. During Saxon times, from the C6 at least, Faversham appears to have been a royal estate centre, perhaps of comparable status with Milton Regis to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Sim World 2 Southeastern High Speed Driver's Manual EN.Pdf
    EN SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED ©2021 Dovetail Games, a trading name of RailSimulator.com Limited (“DTG”). "Dovetail Games", “Train Sim World” and “SimuGraph” are trademarks or registered trademarks of DTG. Unreal® Engine, ©1998-2021, Epic Games, Inc. All rights reserved. Unreal® is a registered trademark of Epic Games. Portions of this software utilise SpeedTree® technology (©2014 Interactive Data Visualization, Inc.). SpeedTree® is a registered trademark of Interactive Data Visualization, Inc. All rights reserved. Southeastern is the registered trade mark of The Go-Ahead Group PLC. Permission to use the Double Arrow Trade Mark is granted by the Secretary of State for Transport. All other copyrights or trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used here with permission. Unauthorised copying, adaptation, rental, re-sale, arcade use, charging for use, broadcast, cable transmission, public performance, distribution or extraction of the product or any trademark or copyright work that forms part of this product is prohibited. Developed and published by DTG. CONTENTS 1 SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED OVERVIEW 5 TRAIN SAFETY & IN-CAB SIGNALLING SYSTEMS 5 INTRODUCING SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED 43 AUTOMATIC WARNING SYSTEM (AWS) 6 ROUTE MAP & POINTS OF INTEREST 44 TRAIN PROTECTION & WARNING SYSTEM (TPWS) 7 GAME MODES 45 KVB 2 THE BR CLASS 395 'JAVELIN' 47 TVM-430 8 INTRODUCING THE BR CLASS 395 'JAVELIN' 6 BRITISH RAILWAY SIGNALLING 9 BR CLASS 395 DRIVING CAB: FRONT 50 COLOUR LIGHT 10 BR CLASS 395 DRIVING CAB: REAR 56 SEMAPHORE 11 BR CLASS
    [Show full text]