DOCSLIB.ORG

POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Adelphia Gateway Project Tilghman Lateral Phase 2B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Adelphia Gateway Project Tilghman Lateral Phase 2B POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Adelphia Gateway Project Tilghman Lateral Phase 2B Submitted to: September 2020 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PLAN PREPARER CREDENTIALS..............................................................................................2 II. PCSM PLANNING AND DESIGN ................................................................................................2 III. SOIL CHARACTERISTICS ...........................................................................................................3 IV. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF THE PROJECT SITE AND THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREA.................................................................................................................3 V. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATIONS .....................................................................................4 VI. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ON-SITE BMPS ............4 VII. VOLUME REDUCTION AND WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS .....................................5 VIII. RATE REQUIREMENTS ...............................................................................................................7 IX. GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS OR SOIL CONDITIONS ................................................................7 X. POTENTIAL THERMAL IMPACTS TO SURFACE WATERS ..................................................8 XI. EXISTING/PROPOSED RIPARIAN FOREST BUFFERS ...........................................................8 XII. ANTIDEGRADATION REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................8 XIII. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE .....................................................................................................8 XIV. LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE ............................................................................11 XV. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................11 APPENDICES A. LOCATION MAP B. SOIL DATA 1. SOIL MAP 2. SOIL MAP UNIT DESCRIPTION 3. SOIL USE LIMITATIONS AND RESOLUTIONS C. CHAPTER 102 COMPLIANCE D. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS 1. BMP WORKSHEETS 2. BMP COMPUTATIONS - EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. BMP COMPUTATIONS – PROPOSED CONDITIONS E. DRAINAGE AREAS PLANS F. INFILTRATION TESTING REPORTS 1 I. PLAN PREPARER CREDENTIALS The PCSM plan was prepared by Shiny Mathew, P.E. She is a Professional Engineer and a graduate of Widener University with a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering. Mrs. Mathew has been designing project of similar size and scale for 14 years throughout Southeastern PA. She has delivered projects for several public and private clients. Her project experience includes American Street Improvement Project (Philadelphia), Bakers Centre Development (Philadelphia), SEPTA Jenkintown Stream Restoration (Montgomery Co), and Radnor High School Bus Loop Improvements (Delaware Co.). II. PCSM PLANNING AND DESIGN Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson (JMT), on behalf of Adelphia Gateway, has prepared this Post Construction Stormwater Management (PCSM) Plan for the Adelphia Gateway Pipeline. The PCSM Plan has been designed in accordance with the criteria stated in the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual, dated December 2006; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP), Bureau of Waterways Engineering and Wetlands Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual, dated March 2012, thus satisfying requirements for PADEP General Permit (ESCGP-3) for Earth Disturbance Associated with Oil and Gas Exploration, Production, Processing, or Treatment Operations or Transmission Facilities contained under Pa. Code Title 25 Chapter 102. The Adelphia Gateway Pipeline is an 84-mile pipeline that runs from Martins Creek to Marcus Hook. Facility upgrades will occur to thirteen (13) sites along the pipeline: Quakertown Compressor Station, East Perkiomen Blowdown, Skippack Pike Valve Site, Perkiomen Creek Blowdown, Schuylkill River Blowdown, Cromby Blowdown, French Creek Blowdown, Mainline Valve 2, Paoli Pike Blowdown, Chester Creek Blowdown, Mainline Valve 1, Transco Meter Station, and Marcus Hook Compressor and Meter Station. The total limit of disturbance is 13.9 acres. The Tilghman and Parkway lateral, known as Phase 2A consists of 1,925 LF of proposed pipeline between the Delaware State Line/Marcus Hook Compressor and Meter Station and Transco Meter Station. It is to be installed through traditional open cut installation and horizontal direction drill (HDD) installation methods. The limit of disturbance within Phase 2A is 0.15 acres. The Tilghman lateral pipeline, known as Phase 2B, consists of approximately 4.4 miles of proposed 16-inch O.D. pipeline. The installation consists of open cut for approximately 0.6 miles and horizontal directional drill (HDD) for approximately 3.8 miles. The total limit of disturbance is 24.76 acres. However, only 1.3 acres is open cut trench. The remaining pipe installation is to be completed using HDD, minimizing surface disturbance. The remaining area included in the LOD is temporary workspace intended for parking, staging materials and equipment, and stockpiling. Mechanical piping and two buildings are proposed at the PECO Meter Station where the Tilghman Lateral ends. 2 The entire limit of disturbance for the Tilghman Lateral section will be restored to existing conditions and site restoration and PCSM devices (two dry wells) are proposed at the PECO Meter Station. This narrative describes the PCSM measures of Adelphia Gateway Pipeline Phase 2B and related site work. This narrative applies to the PCSM activities for Phase 2B only. Phase 1 and 2A were submitted to DEP under a separate application. III. SOIL CHARACTERISTICS Table III-1 below detail the types of soils, as contained within the Stormwater Management areas, for each of the thirteen sites, as defined by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey. Table III-1: Soil Types within LOD Symbol Map Unit Name Brief Map Unit Description ByB2 Butlertown silt loam, 3 to 8 Soil Rating C, slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. percent slopes Mainly soils with layer that impedes downward movement of water or soils of fine texture. Slow rate of water transmission. Ma Made land, gravelly Soil Rating A, high infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. materials Mainly deep, well drained sands or gravelly sands. High rate of water transmission. OtA Othello silt loams, 0 to 2 Soil Rating C/D, very slow infiltration rate when thoroughly percent slopes wet. Mainly clays, high water table soils, claypan or clay layer at or near surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. Very slow rate of water transmission. We Wehadkee silt loam Soil Rating D, very slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. Mainly clays, high water table soils, claypan or clay later at or near surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. Very slow rate of water transmission. The Hydrologic Soil Group Rating Report from USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey, which includes a soil map, the physical properties of the soils, and the soil use limitations and resolutions is provided for each site in Appendix B. IV. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF THE PROJECT SITE AND THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREA USGS quadrangle location maps are provided in Appendix A, which shows the location of the project site and the surrounding area. 3 The limit of disturbance is primarily roadway (SR 3006, SR 291, Flower Street and Delaware Ave), which was constructed well over 5 years ago. The remaining section of disturbance is land adjacent and through industrial sites. Soil infiltration testing at PECO Meter Station was performed on July 24, 2020 using the Double Ring Infiltration Test method. Two (2) test infiltration tests were performed at the dry well bottom elevation. The infiltration testing resulted in infiltration rates of 1.00 and 1.25 in/hr, respectively. Both infiltration test pits demonstrated sandy silt at the testing depth with no limiting layers, such as impervious clay, bedrock, or groundwater. Based on the findings, infiltration was recommended at this site. V. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATIONS Table V-1 below details the three (3) watersheds in which the project site is located within, as well as the receiving surface waters classification, as defined by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) Title 25, Chapter 93: Water Quality Standards. Note the following acronyms: WWF (Warm Water Fishes), and MF (Migratory Fishes). Table V-1: Receiving Surface waters Classification Watershed Chapter 93 Classification Marcus Hook Creek WWF, MF, siltation-impaired Stoney Creek WWF, MF Delaware River WWF, MF VI. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ON-SITE BMPS The following Best Management Practices (BMP), in accordance with Pennsylvania Stormwater BMP Manual, dated December 2006, have been integrated into the design to reduce runoff volume, reduce peak rates and improve water quality. These structural BMPs will result in the prevention or minimization of increased stormwater runoff rate, volume and/or changes in stormwater runoff. Implementing these controls will preserve the integrity of stream channels and maintain and protect the physical, biological and chemical qualities of the receiving stream. The limit of disturbance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak
    RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak Amtrak Police Department (APD) Frequency Plan Freq Input Chan Use Tone 161.295 R (160.365) A Amtrak Police Dispatch 71.9 161.295 R (160.365) B Amtrak Police Dispatch 100.0 161.295 R (160.365) C Amtrak Police Dispatch 114.8 161.295 R (160.365) D Amtrak Police Dispatch 131.8 161.295 R (160.365) E Amtrak Police Dispatch 156.7 161.295 R (160.365) F Amtrak Police Dispatch 94.8 161.295 R (160.365) G Amtrak Police Dispatch 192.8 161.295 R (160.365) H Amtrak Police Dispatch 107.2 161.205 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Primary 146.2 160.815 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Secondary 146.2 160.830 R (160.215) Amtrak Police CID 123.0 173.375 Amtrak Police On-Train Use 203.5 Amtrak Police Area Repeater Locations Chan Location A Wilmington, DE B Morrisville, PA C Philadelphia, PA D Gap, PA E Paoli, PA H Race Amtrak Police 10-Codes 10-0 Emergency Broadcast 10-21 Call By Telephone 10-1 Receiving Poorly 10-22 Disregard 10-2 Receiving Well 10-24 Alarm 10-3 Priority Service 10-26 Prepare to Copy 10-4 Affirmative 10-33 Does Not Conform to Regulation 10-5 Repeat Message 10-36 Time Check 10-6 Busy 10-41 Begin Tour of Duty 10-7 Out Of Service 10-45 Accident 10-8 Back In Service 10-47 Train Protection 10-10 Vehicle/Person Check 10-48 Vandalism 10-11 Request Additional APD Units 10-49 Passenger/Patron Assist 10-12 Request Supervisor 10-50 Disorderly 10-13 Request Local Jurisdiction Police 10-77 Estimated Time of Arrival 10-14 Request Ambulance or Rescue Squad 10-82 Hostage 10-15 Request Fire Department 10-88 Bomb Threat 10-16
    [Show full text]
  • Marcus Hook, PA Alagoas - Brazil 5 PE
    Using I-95 During Reconstruction Overview Update Congestion Management Communications Elaine Elbich, PE Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Goods Movement Task Force October 16, 2013 I-95 Corridor Conditions • 5 “Sectors” in Bucks, Philadelphia and Delaware Counties • 51 Miles, 325 Lane Miles, 210 Bridges, 55,000 to 190,000 Annual Average Daily Traffic • Priority Based on Physical Conditions and Accident History • Estimated Total Cost to Rebuild: $8-10 Billion Sector A Design and Construction • Limits: I-676 Interchange to Cottman Princeton Interchange • Approximately 8 Miles in Design or Construction • Five Separate Design Sections Began in 1999 • Scheduled Construction from 2009 to 2025 Sector A Schedules and Costs • Approximately $200 Million Bid to Construction Per Year • $2.3 Billion Total Estimated Cost • Both Regional and Intersate Management Program Funds Construction Update, Section CPR • Project Construction Cost: $290 Million • 1.4 Miles of New Pavement, Rebuild 7 Mainline bridges • Restore Dropped Mainline Lanes • New Interchange Ramps on the Eastside of Mainline • Section CP1 Completed and CP2 under Construction with Completion in 2017 Construction Update, Section CPR • CP2 Phased Maintenance and Protection of Traffic Stages • Stage 1: (Late 2012 to Early 2013) on Mainline Shoulder Paving and Preparation • Stage 2: (Early 2013 to Mid 2013) on Mainline Median • Stage 3: Mid 2013 to Mid 2014, Work on Southbound Mainline • Stage 4: Mid 2014 to Late 2015 Work on the Mainline
    [Show full text]
  • Marcus Hook Grade Crossing Study July 2019
    MARCUS HOOK GRADE CROSSING STUDY JULY 2019 I James Anthony dDELAWARE VALLEY DVRPC's vision for the Greater Philadelphia Region is a prosperous, innovative, equitable, resilient, and t'J ... ,~rpc sustainable region that increases mobility choices PLANNING COMMISSION by investing in a safe and modern transportation system; that protects and preserves our natural resources while creating healthy communities; and that fosters greater MD opportunities for all. • Baltimore DE DVRPC's mission is to achieve this vision by convening the widest array of partners to inform and facilitate data-driven decision-making. We are engaged The Delaware across the region, and strive to be leaders and innovators, exploring new ideas and creating best practices. Valley Regional Planning Commission TITLE VI COMPLIANCE I DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 7964, the Civil Rights is the federally designated Restoration Act of 7987, Executive Order 72898 on Environmental Justice, and related nondiscrimination statutes Metropolitan Planning and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC's website, www.dvrpc.org, may be translated into multiple Organization for a diverse languages. Publications and other public documents can be made available in alternative languages and formats, if requested. DVRPC public meetings are always held in ADA-accessible facilities, and in transit-accessible nine-county region in two locations when possible. Auxiliary services can be provided to individuals who submit a request at least seven days states: Bucks, Chester, prior to a public meeting. Requests will be accommodated to the greatest extent possible. Any person who believes Delaware, Montgomery, they have been aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice by DVRPC under Title VI has a right to file a formal complaint.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Stationary Point Sources
    APPENDIX B STATIONARY POINT SOURCES Bureau of Air Quality Department of Environmental Protection This page blank for copying purposes. APPENDIX B-1 Preparation of Pennsylvania Point Source Inventories and Instructions for Completing the Annual Emissions Reporting Forms Bureau of Air Quality Department of Environmental Protection This page blank for copying purposes. A. Introduction This document describes the methodology used by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to develop inventories of air pollutants emitted as required by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule (CERR) (40 CFR Part 51, Subpart A). The 2002 inventory will also be the base year inventory for State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision development for PM2.5, 8- hour ozone and regional haze. The CERR requires the Commonwealth to report actual emissions for the following pollutants: sulfur oxides, volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, lead and lead compounds, primary PM2.5, primary PM10, and ammonia (40 CFR 51.15(a)). The CERR lists primary PM as an optional pollutant for reporting purposes. The CERR does not require the submission of hazardous air pollutant emissions data. Emissions from point sources are reported for 65 of the Commonwealth’s 67 counties. Point source emissions from sources located in Allegheny County are reported directly to EPA by the Allegheny County Health Department. Point source emissions from sources located in Philadelphia Counties are reported directly by the Philadelphia County Health Department, Air Management Services. The annual emission inventory must be temporally resolved to provide seasonal data for air quality modeling purposes. Temporal adjustments to the annual inventory are made because of seasonal differences in the rate of emissions or activity, or to apportion emissions to a particular season or day.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Action Plan
    Watershed Action Plan December 2002 Mission Watersheds Statement To protect, sustain, and enhance the quality and quantity of all water resources to insure the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens, and preserve the diverse natural resources and aesthetic and recreational assets of Chester County and its watersheds. Disclaimer The maps, data and information presented herein were compiled by the Chester County Water Resources Authority for the County of Chester, PA and are hereby referenced to the Chester County, Pennsylvania Water Resources Compendium (2001). These information and data are pro- vided for reference and planning purposes only. This document is based on and presents the best information available at the time of the preparation. Funding Partners Chester County and the Chester County Water Resources Authority express their appreciation to those entities who provided financial support for this effort. This project was funded by: • Chester County Board of Commissioners. • Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation, Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund Program. • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Program. • Brandywine Valley Association and William Penn Foundation. • U. S. Geological Survey. Chester County Board of Commissioners Karen L. Martynick, Chairman Colin A. Hanna Andrew E. Dinniman Watershed Action Plan December 2002 Prepared by: Chester County Water Resources Authority Chester County Planning Commission Camp Dresser and McKee Gaadt Perspectives, LLC Prepared as a component of: Chester County, Pennsylvania Water Resources Compendium _________________________ Prepared under a Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Grant funded by Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and U.
    [Show full text]
  • RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak
    RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak Amtrak Police Department (APD) Frequency Plan Freq Input Chan Use Tone 161.295 R (160.365) A Amtrak Police Dispatch 88.5 161.295 R (160.365) B Amtrak Police Dispatch 100.0 161.295 R (160.365) C Amtrak Police Dispatch 114.8 161.295 R (160.365) D Amtrak Police Dispatch 131.8 161.295 R (160.365) E Amtrak Police Dispatch 156.7 161.295 R (160.365) F Amtrak Police Dispatch 94.8 161.295 R (160.365) G Amtrak Police Dispatch 192.8 161.295 R (160.365) H Amtrak Police Dispatch 107.2 161.205 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Primary 146.2 160.815 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Secondary 146.2 160.830 R (160.215) Amtrak Police CID 123.0 173.375 Amtrak Police On-Train Use 203.5 Amtrak Police Area Repeater Locations Chan Location A Wilmington, DE B Morrisville, PA (and Trenton Station) C Philadelphia, PA D Gap, PA E Paoli, PA H Race Amtrak Police 10-Codes 10-0 Emergency Broadcast 10-21 Call By Telephone 10-1 Receiving Poorly 10-22 Disregard 10-2 Receiving Well 10-24 Alarm 10-3 Priority Service 10-26 Prepare to Copy 10-4 Affirmative 10-33 Does Not Conform to Regulation 10-5 Repeat Message 10-36 Time Check 10-6 Busy 10-41 Begin Tour of Duty 10-7 Out Of Service 10-45 Accident 10-8 Back In Service 10-47 Train Protection 10-10 Vehicle/Person Check 10-48 Vandalism 10-11 Request Additional APD Units 10-49 Passenger/Patron Assist 10-12 Request Supervisor 10-50 Disorderly 10-13 Request Local Jurisdiction Police 10-77 Estimated Time of Arrival 10-14 Request Ambulance or Rescue Squad 10-82 Hostage 10-15 Request Fire Department
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Reuse of Inactive Rail Lines
    Potential Reuse of Inactive Rail Lines November 1991 Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Potential Reuse of Inactive Rail Lines November 1991 Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission The Bourse Building 21 South Fifth Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 This report, prepared by the Transportation Planning Division of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, was financed in part by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration of the U. S. Department of Transportation, the Pennsylvania local governments and the New Jersey Department of Transportation. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its finding and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency which provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning for the orderly growth and development of the Delaware Val/ey region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties as well as the City of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer counties in New Jersey. The Commission is an advisory agency which divides its planning and service functions among the Office of the Executive Director, the Office of Public Affairs, and four line Divisions: Transportation Planning, Regional Information Services Center, Strategic Planning, and Finance and Administration. DVRPC's mission for the 1990s is to emphasize technical assistance and services and to conduct high priority studies for member state and local governments, while determining and meeting the needs of the private sector. The DVRPC logo is adapted from the official seal of the Commission and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Implementation of the Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program Agreement for Pennsylvania
    PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE VOLUNTARY PUBLIC ACCESS AND HABITAT INCENTIVE PROGRAM AGREEMENT FOR PENNSYLVANIA FINAL THE PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION In Partnership With U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency May 2011 ES- ES- BLANK ES - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) describes the potential environmental consequences resulting from the proposed implementation of Pennsylvania’s Voluntary Public Access Habitat Incentive Program (VPA-HIP) agreement. The environmental analysis process is designed: to ensure the public is involved in the process and informed about the potential environmental effects of the proposed action; and to help decision makers take environmental factors into consideration when making decisions related to the proposed action. This PEA has been prepared by the Pennsylvania Game Commission in accordance with the requirements of the United States Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency (FSA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality regulations implementing NEPA, and 7CFR 799 Environmental quality and Related Environmental Concerns – Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action The purpose of the proposed action is to implement Pennsylvania’s VPA-HIP agreement. Under the agreement, eligible private lands in Pennsylvania will be enrolled in the Pennsylvania Game Commission’s existing Public Access Cooperator Program and an enhanced
    [Show full text]
  • Stony Creek/ Saw Mill Run Greenway Plan
    StonyStony Creek/Creek/ SawSaw MillMill RunRun GreenwayGreenway PlanPlan DecemberDecember 20162016 MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NORRISTOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGER PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTOR TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION STONY CREEK/ SAW MILL RUN GREENWAY PLAN CHAPTER 2 GREENWAY CHARACTERISTICS COMMUNITY CONTEXT EXISTING LAND USE ANALYSIS COMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS CHAPTER 3 IMPORTANT RESOURCES GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION SOILS iii SCENIC PLACES AND VISTAS HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER 4 STREAMS STONY CREEK SAW MILL RUN FLOODING WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 5 GREENWAY CORRIDOR FEATURES STONY CREEK SAW MILL RUN CHAPTER 6 GOALS GOALS POTENTIAL PROJECT BENEFITS CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING PLANS CHAPTER 7 RECOMMENDATIONS LINKAGES GREENWAY SECTION TRAIL CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATIONS STONY CREEK SAW MILL RUN FISHING ALONG THE CREEKS BIRDWATCHING ALONG THE GREENWAY REVITALIZATION CREEK AWARENESS EDUCATION STREAM RESTORATION GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE INSFRASTRUCTURE LAND PROTECTION iv CHAPTER 8 IMPLEMENTATION BACKGROUND IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX RESPONSIBILITY PRIORITY CATEGORIES FUNDING SOURCES CHAPTER 9 PLANNING PROCESS ADVISORY COMMITTEE PUBLIC MEETINGS KEY PERSON INTERVIEWS FIELD TRIPS v vi LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER 2 COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS CHAPTER 3 IMPORTANT RESOURCES CHAPTER 4 STREAMS CHAPTER 5 GREENWAY CORRIDOR FEATURES CHAPTER 7 RECOMMENDATIONS vii CHAPTER 8 IMPLEMENTATION viii STONY CREEK/ SAW MILL RUN GREENWAY PLAN CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION STONY CREEK/ SAW MILL RUN GREENWAY PLAN The Stony Creek/ Saw Mill Run Greenway Plan has two complementary purposes: To assess the opportu- nities for creating continuous greenway corridors along the Stony Creek and Saw Mill Run in Norristown and in portions of the adjacent municipalities of East Norriton and West Norriton Townships and to assess the feasibility of implementing a public trail within each greenway corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Grant Listing.Pdf
    2017 Grant Recipients Exelon Corporation Exelon’s vision of providing superior value for our customers, employees and investors extends to the communities that we serve. In 2017, the Exelon family of companies provided over $44.9 million to non-profit organizations in the cities, towns and neighborhoods where our employees and customers live and work. In addition, the Exelon Foundation contributed over $7.1 million to communities Exelon serves. Exelon’s philanthropic efforts are focused on math and science education, environment, culture and arts and neighborhood development. Our employees’ efforts complement corporate contributions through volunteering and service on non-profit boards. Our employees volunteered 210,195 hours of community service in 2017. In addition, employees contributed a total of $11.84 million to the charity of their choice through the Exelon Foundation Matching Gifts Program and the Exelon Employee Giving Campaign. Exelon Corporation (NYSE: EXC) is a Fortune 100 energy company with the largest number of utility customers in the U.S. Exelon does business in 48 states, the District of Columbia and Canada and had 2017 revenue of $33.5 billion. Exelon’s six utilities deliver electricity and natural gas to approximately 10 million customers in Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey and Pennsylvania through its Atlantic City Electric, BGE, ComEd, Delmarva Power, PECO and Pepco subsidiaries. Exelon is one of the largest competitive U.S. power generators, with more than 32,700 megawatts of nuclear, gas, wind, solar and hydroelectric generating capacity comprising one of the nation’s cleanest and lowest-cost power generation fleets.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    June 6, 2019 Douglas C. McLearen, Chief Division of Archaeology and Protection Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission State Historic Preservation Office 400 North Street Commonwealth Keystone Building, 2nd Floor Harrisburg, PA 17120-0093 Subject: ER # 2017-2210-042 Adelphia Gateway Project Continuing Section 106 Consultation Dear Mr. McLearen, On behalf of Adelphia Gateway, LLC, NV5 is submitting (electronically via CRGIS) a Phase I Archaeological Survey Report for the Transco Meter Station and Tilghman Lateral components of the Adelphia Gateway Project. The survey was undertaken as per consultation comments received in a letter from you dated September 14, 2018 and a subsequent email dated September 19, 2018. One archaeological site was identified. We look forward to receipt of your comments. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (727) 565-9895 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Sincerely, Sara Holmes Environmental Scientist NV5 PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADELPHIA GATEWAY PROJECT TRANSCO METER STATION AND TILGHMAN LATERAL JUNE 2019 PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR: NV5, LLC Adelphia Gateway, LLC 200 S Park Road, Ste. 350 1415 Wyckoff Road Hollywood, FL 33021 Wall, NJ 07719 A PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADELPHIA GATEWAY PROJECT TRANSCO METER STATION AND TILGHMAN LATERAL LOWER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP AND TRAINER BOROUGH, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ER # 2017-2210-042 Prepared for: Adelphia Gateway, LLC Agencies involved: FERC Prepared by: Jean E. Howson and Leonard G. Bianchi Cultural Resource Unit NV5, Inc. Parsippany, NJ June 2019 PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR: NV5, LLC Adelphia Gateway, LLC 200 S Park Road, Ste. 350 1415 Wyckoff Road Hollywood, FL 33021 Wall, NJ 07719 A 1 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY NV5 conducted a Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Transco Meter Station and Tilghman Lateral portion of the Adelphia Gateway Project.
    [Show full text]
  • 13CONR001 SOFA TT10-1Revmay10.Indd
    DEDICATED TO SAFETY TIMETABLE NUMBER CONTAINING STATION PAGES AND SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL CONRAIL OPERATIONS EFFECTIVE 6:01 P.M., EASTERN STANDARD TIME JULY 1, 2013 R. L. BATORY President & Chief Operating Officer T. C. TIERNEY Vice President/Chief Engineer J. F. SCULLIN T. A. GARDNER J. J. GAROFOLO Superintendent Director Superintendent Service Delivery Operations Operations Support Support Center SWITCHING OPERATIONS FATALITY ANALYSIS What are the 5 Lifesaving Recommendations? TABLE OF CONTENTS Page JOB BRIEFING GUIDELINES ............................................................... 1 CRITICAL SAFETY RULES ................................................................... 2 THREE-STEP PROTECTION ............................................................. 2 EMPLOYEE QUALIFICATIONS ............................................................. 3–6 DETROIT DISTRICT QUALIFICATIONS ............................................ 4 NORTH JERSEY DISTRICT QUALIFICATIONS ................................ 5 SOUTH JERSEY DISTRICT QUALIFICATIONS ................................ 6 EXAMINATION RECORD OF EMPLOYEE TIMETABLE AND OTHER INSTRUCTIONS .............................................................. 7 RECORD OF EXAMINATION (CT-1515) ............................................... 8 HAND-HELD AIR GAUGE ACCURACY VERIFICATION RECORD ...... 9 SEVEN POINT SAFETY MESSAGE ..................................................... 10 TRANSPORTATION TELEPHONE NUMBERS ..................................... 11 MEDICAL REVIEW OFFICER ...........................................................
    [Show full text]