Benin Country Portfolio
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
B E N I N Benin
Birnin o Kebbi !( !( Kardi KANTCHARIKantchari !( !( Pékinga Niger Jega !( Diapaga FADA N'GOUMA o !( (! Fada Ngourma Gaya !( o TENKODOGO !( Guéné !( Madécali Tenkodogo !( Burkina Faso Tou l ou a (! Kende !( Founogo !( Alibori Gogue Kpara !( Bahindi !( TUGA Suroko o AIRSTRIP !( !( !( Yaobérégou Banikoara KANDI o o Koabagou !( PORGA !( Firou Boukoubrou !(Séozanbiani Batia !( !( Loaka !( Nansougou !( !( Simpassou !( Kankohoum-Dassari Tian Wassaka !( Kérou Hirou !( !( Nassoukou Diadia (! Tel e !( !( Tankonga Bin Kébérou !( Yauri Atakora !( Kpan Tanguiéta !( !( Daro-Tempobré Dammbouti !( !( !( Koyadi Guilmaro !( Gambaga Outianhou !( !( !( Borogou !( Tounkountouna Cabare Kountouri Datori !( !( Sécougourou Manta !( !( NATITINGOU o !( BEMBEREKE !( !( Kouandé o Sagbiabou Natitingou Kotoponga !(Makrou Gurai !( Bérasson !( !( Boukombé Niaro Naboulgou !( !( !( Nasso !( !( Kounounko Gbangbanrou !( Baré Borgou !( Nikki Wawa Nambiri Biro !( !( !( !( o !( !( Daroukparou KAINJI Copargo Péréré !( Chin NIAMTOUGOU(!o !( DJOUGOUo Djougou Benin !( Guerin-Kouka !( Babiré !( Afekaul Miassi !( !( !( !( Kounakouro Sheshe !( !( !( Partago Alafiarou Lama-Kara Sece Demon !( !( o Yendi (! Dabogou !( PARAKOU YENDI o !( Donga Aledjo-Koura !( Salamanga Yérémarou Bassari !( !( Jebba Tindou Kishi !( !( !( Sokodé Bassila !( Igbéré Ghana (! !( Tchaourou !( !(Olougbé Shaki Togo !( Nigeria !( !( Dadjo Kilibo Ilorin Ouessé Kalande !( !( !( Diagbalo Banté !( ILORIN (!o !( Kaboua Ajasse Akalanpa !( !( !( Ogbomosho Collines !( Offa !( SAVE Savé !( Koutago o !( Okio Ila Doumé !( -
Update Choléra
Benin Update Choléra 22 Septembre 2016 @UNICEF Benin 2016 Benin @UNICEF Du 9 août au 22 septembre 2016, au total, 508 cas ont été enregistrés au Bénin dont 10 décès soit une létalité de 1,96 %. A ce jour, 13 communes sur 77 et 6 départements sur 12 sont touchés. Cas Décès 1er Septembre +25 cas avec 22 à Cotonou, 2 à Abomey-Calavi et 1 cas à Allada 1 2 Septembre +22 cas avec17 à Cotonou, 4 à Abomey-Calavi et 1 à So-Ava 1 3 Septembre +21 cas avec 19 à Cotonou, 1 à Allada, 1 à So-Ava et 1 à Abomey 0 4 Septembre + 22 cas; 14 à Cotonou, 7 à Abomey-Calavi, et 1 à Parakou 0 5 Septembre + 26 cas; 24 à Cotonou, 1 à Abomey-Calavi, et 1 à Ouidah 0 6 Septembre + 10 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 7 Septembre + 8 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 8 Septembre + 20 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 9 Septembre + 12 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 10 Septembre + 12 cas; avec 11 à Cotonou et 1 à Ndali(Borgou) 0 11 Septembre + 14 cas; Cotonou seulement 1 12 Septembre + 4 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 13 Septembre + 3 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 14 Septembre + 3 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 15 Septembre + 4 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 16 Septembre + 6 cas; 5 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 17 Septembre + 12 cas; 6 à Cotonou, 2 à Abomey-calavi et 4 à Savalou 0 18 Septembre + 15 cas; 12 à Cotonou et 3 à Savalou 0 19 Septembre + 13 cas; 12 à Cotonou et 1 à Abomey-calavi 0 20 Septembre + 6 cas; 5 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 21 Septembre + 10 cas; 9 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 22 Septembre + 8 cas; 7 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 1. -
GIEWS Country Brief Benin
GIEWS Country Brief Benin Reference Date: 23-April-2020 FOOD SECURITY SNAPSHOT Planting of 2020 main season maize ongoing in south under normal moisture conditions Above-average 2019 cereal crop harvested Prices of coarse grains overall stable in March Pockets of food insecurity persist Start of 2020 cropping season in south follows timely onset of rains Following the timely onset of seasonal rains in the south, planting of yams was completed in March, while planting of the main season maize crop is ongoing and will be completed by the end of April. The harvest of yams is expected to start in July, while harvesting operations of maize will start in August. Planting of rice crops, to be harvested from August, is underway. The cumulative rainfall amounts since early March have been average to above average in most planted areas and supported the development of yams and maize crops, which are at sprouting, seedling and tillering stages. Weeding activities are normally taking place in most cropped areas. In the north, seasonal dry weather conditions are still prevailing and planting operations for millet and sorghum, to be harvested from October, are expected to begin in May-June with the onset of the rains. In April, despite the ongoing pastoral lean season, forage availability was overall satisfactory in the main grazing areas of the country. The seasonal movement of domestic livestock, returning from the south to the north, started in early March following the normal onset of the rains in the south. The animal health situation is generally good and stable, with just some localized outbreaks of seasonal diseases, including Trypanosomiasis and Contagious Bovine Peripneumonia. -
MCA-Benin's ‘Access to Land’ Project and Its Aftermath
BENIN INSTITUTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC WP19/BID08 CHAPTER 7: HISTORY AND POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LAND ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN BENIN Philippe Lavigne Delville French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development, With discussion by Kenneth Houngbedji Paris School of Economics August 2019 History and Political Economy of Land Administration Reform in Benin Table of contents Acronyms ii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Land reforms in Africa, between the privatisation paradigm and the adaptation paradigm 1 1.2 Understanding the political economy of an ongoing reform: a process-tracing approach 4 2 State ownership, informality, semi-formal arrangements and ‘confusion management’: a brief analysis of the land sector in the early 2000s 6 2.1 Institutional weaknesses and semi-formal arrangements 6 2.2 Land governance, between neo-customary regulations, the market, and semi- formal systems 10 2.3 ‘Managing confusion’ 13 2.4 Institutional bottlenecks before reforms: a tentative synthesis 15 3 The search for overall/sectorial adjustment in the land sector in the years 1990– 2000: a telescoping of reforms 16 3.1 The emergence of the land issue in the 1990s 16 3.2 In urban areas, tax experiments and unsuccessful discussions on legal reform 16 3.3 In rural areas, the PFRs and the draft rural land law: the construction of an alternative to land title 17 3.4 In the mid-2000s: the MCA-Benin and the emergence of a global reform project 20 4 Extend access to land title through a deep reform of land administration: MCA- Benin's ‘Access to Land’ project and its aftermath -
The Gold Standard Micro-Programme Activity Design Document Template (Vpa-Dd)
TITLE OF THE MICRO-PROGRAMME: GS2489 Efficient cookstoves in Benin and Togo ANNEX AO – THE GOLD STANDARD MICRO-PROGRAMME ACTIVITY DESIGN DOCUMENT TEMPLATE (VPA-DD) CONTENTS A. General description of micro-programme activity (VPA) B. Eligibility of VPA and Estimation of Emission Reductions C. Stakeholder comments Annexes Annex 1: Contact information on entity/individual responsible for the VPA Annex 2: Information regarding public funding This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font. 1 TITLE OF THE MICRO-PROGRAMME: GS2489 Efficient cookstoves in Benin and Togo SECTION A. General description of micro-programme activity (VPA) A.1. Title of the micro-scale VPA: Title: GS2489 Efficient cookstoves in Benin and Togo – VPA2 – EcoBenin – Wanrou efficient cookstoves in Atacora/Donga region GS nr: GS6008 Date: 28/08/2017 Version: 01 A.2. Description of the micro-scale VPA: >> The departments of Atacora / Donga, are suffering from severe deforestation due to the rapid increase of its population and their energy needs. 91% of the households in the Atacora/Donga departments use fuelwood as main combustion fuel.1 According to the document SCRP -Benin 2011- 20152, 69% of the population of this region is considered as poor. In this region, the cooking of meals is done on traditional three stones coosktoves, which have a very low energy efficiency. The new project "Promotion of the Wanrou efficient cookstove in the region of Atacora/Donga (ProWAD)”3 4 is included as VPA-2 in the program of activities (PoA) GS2489 "Efficient cookstoves in Benin and Togo" and is implemented by EcoBenin. -
Comparative Analysis of Diversity and Utilization of Edible Plants in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas in Benin Alcade C Segnon* and Enoch G Achigan-Dako
Segnon and Achigan-Dako Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2014, 10:80 http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/10/1/80 JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE RESEARCH Open Access Comparative analysis of diversity and utilization of edible plants in arid and semi-arid areas in Benin Alcade C Segnon* and Enoch G Achigan-Dako Abstract Background: Agrobiodiversity is said to contribute to the sustainability of agricultural systems and food security. However, how this is achieved especially in smallholder farming systems in arid and semi-arid areas is rarely documented. In this study, we explored two contrasting regions in Benin to investigate how agroecological and socioeconomic contexts shape the diversity and utilization of edible plants in these regions. Methods: Data were collected through focus group discussions in 12 villages with four in Bassila (semi-arid Sudano-Guinean region) and eight in Boukoumbé (arid Sudanian region). Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 180 farmers (90 in each region). Species richness and Shannon-Wiener diversity index were estimated based on presence-absence data obtained from the focus group discussions using species accumulation curves. Results: Our results indicated that 115 species belonging to 48 families and 92 genera were used to address food security. Overall, wild species represent 61% of edible plants collected (60% in the semi-arid area and 54% in the arid area). About 25% of wild edible plants were under domestication. Edible species richness and diversity in the semi-arid area were significantly higher than in the arid area. However, farmers in the arid area have developed advanced resource-conserving practices compared to their counterparts in the semi-arid area where slash-and-burn cultivation is still ongoing, resulting in natural resources degradation and loss of biodiversity. -
The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte D'ivoire, and Togo
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Public Disclosure Authorized Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon Public Disclosure Authorized 00000_CVR_English.indd 1 12/6/17 2:29 PM November 2017 The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 1 11/29/17 3:34 PM Photo Credits Cover page (top): © Georges Tadonki Cover page (center): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Cover page (bottom): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Page 1: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 7: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 15: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 32: © Dominic Chavez/World Bank Page 48: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 56: © Ami Vitale/World Bank 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 2 12/6/17 3:27 PM Acknowledgments This study was prepared by Nga Thi Viet Nguyen The team greatly benefited from the valuable and Felipe F. Dizon. Additional contributions were support and feedback of Félicien Accrombessy, made by Brian Blankespoor, Michael Norton, and Prosper R. Backiny-Yetna, Roy Katayama, Rose Irvin Rojas. Marina Tolchinsky provided valuable Mungai, and Kané Youssouf. The team also thanks research assistance. Administrative support by Erick Herman Abiassi, Kathleen Beegle, Benjamin Siele Shifferaw Ketema is gratefully acknowledged. Billard, Luc Christiaensen, Quy-Toan Do, Kristen Himelein, Johannes Hoogeveen, Aparajita Goyal, Overall guidance for this report was received from Jacques Morisset, Elisée Ouedraogo, and Ashesh Andrew L. Dabalen. Prasann for their discussion and comments. Joanne Gaskell, Ayah Mahgoub, and Aly Sanoh pro- vided detailed and careful peer review comments. -
Congressional Budget Justification 2015
U.S. AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION Pathways to Prosperity “Making Africa’s Growth Story Real in Grassroots Communities” CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION Fiscal Year 2015 March 31, 2014 Washington, D.C. United States African Development Foundation (This page was intentionally left blank) 2 USADF 2015 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION United States African Development Foundation THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION WASHINGTON, DC We are pleased to present to the Congress the Administration’s FY 2015 budget justification for the United States African Development Foundation (USADF). The FY 2015 request of $24 million will provide resources to establish new grants in 15 African countries and to support an active portfolio of 350 grants to producer groups engaged in community-based enterprises. USADF is a Federally-funded, public corporation promoting economic development among marginalized populations in Sub-Saharan Africa. USADF impacts 1,500,000 people each year in underserved communities across Africa. Its innovative direct grants program (less than $250,000 per grant) supports sustainable African-originated business solutions that improve food security, generate jobs, and increase family incomes. In addition to making an economic impact in rural populations, USADF’s programs are at the forefront of creating a network of in-country technical service providers with local expertise critical to advancing Africa’s long-term development needs. USADF furthers U.S. priorities by directing small amounts of development resources to disenfranchised groups in hard to reach, sensitive regions across Africa. USADF ensures that critical U.S. development initiatives such as Ending Extreme Poverty, Feed the Future, Power Africa, and the Young African Leaders Initiative reach out to those communities often left out of Africa’s growth story. -
Spatial Distribution and Risks Factors of Porcine Cysticercosis in Southern Benin Based Meat Inspection Records
International Research Journal of Microbiology (IRJM) (ISSN: 2141-5463) Vol. 4(8) pp. 188-196, September, 2013 DOI: http:/dx.doi.org/10.14303/irjm.2013.043 Available online http://www.interesjournals.org/IRJM Copyright © 2013 International Research Journals Full Length Research Paper Spatial distribution and risks factors of porcine cysticercosis in southern Benin based meat inspection records Judicaël S. E. Goussanou ab* , T. Marc Kpodekon ab , Claude Saegerman c, Eric Azagoun a, A. K. Issaka Youssao a, Souaïbou Farougou a, Nicolas Praet d, Sarah Gabriël d., Pierre Dorny d, Nicolas Korsak e aDepartment of animal Production and Heath, Ecole Polytechnique of Abomey-Calavi, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin bLaboratory of Applied Biology, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin cDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Research Unit of Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULg), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium dDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium eFood Sciences Department, Faculty of veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] : Tel: 0022995700449/ 0022997168992 Abstract Porcine cysticercosis, which is widely distributed in Africa, causes financial losses and diseases among humans. To control the disease in an area, it is important to know the geographical distribution. In this study, spatial distribution of porcine cysticercosis in southern Benin was performed. By using the number of partial organ seizures at meat inspection, the study has revealed high risks of porcine cysticercosis in administrative districts of Aplahoue, Dogbo, Klouekanme and Lokossa. The proportion of seizures ranged from 0.06% for neck muscles to 0.69% for tongues. -
Governance, Marketing and Innovations in Beninese Pineapple Supply Chains
Governance, marketing and innovations in Beninese pineapple supply chains A survey of smallholder farmers in South Benin Djalalou-Dine Ademonla A. Arinloye Thesis committee Promotors Prof. Dr S.W.F. Omta Professor of Management Studies, Wageningen University Prof. Dr Ir M.A.J.S. van Boekel Professor of Food Quality and Design, Wageningen University Co-promotors Dr J.L.F. Hagelaar Assistant Professor, Management Studies Group, Wageningen University Dr Ir A.R. Linnemann Assistant Professor, Food Quality and Design, Wageningen University Other members Prof. Dr R. Ruben, Radboud University Nijmegen Prof. Dr ir C. Leeuwis, Wageningen University Prof. Dr X. Gellinck, Ghent University, Belgium Dr D. Hounkonnou, Connecting Development Partners (CDP) International, Benin This research was conducted under the auspices of the Wageningen School of Social Sciences (WASS) and the Graduate School VLAG (Advanced studies in Food Technology, Agrobiotechnology, Nutrition and Health Sciences) Governance, marketing and innovations in Beninese pineapple supply chains A survey of smallholder farmers in South Benin Djalalou-Dine Ademonla A. Arinloye Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Thursday 25 April 2013 at 11 a.m. in the Aula. Djalalou-Dine Ademonla A. Arinloye Governance, marketing and innovations in Beninese pineapple supply chains, 194 pages. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2013) With references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN: 978-94-6173-534-8 Acknowledgements This thesis represents a continuation of my engagement with empirical research I performed at the Agricultural Policy Analysis Unit of the National Agriculture Research Institute of Benin (PAPA/INRAB) and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). -
Use of Molecular Markers in Participatory Plant Breeding: Assessing the Genetic Variability in Cotton Populations Bred by Farmers J
Annals of Applied Biology ISSN 0003-4746 RESEARCH ARTICLE Use of molecular markers in participatory plant breeding: assessing the genetic variability in cotton populations bred by farmers J. Lancxon1,2, J.-P. Pichaut1, M. Djaboutou2, S. Lewicki-Dhainaut1,2, C. Viot1 & J.-M. Lacape1 1 CIRAD, Centre de Coope´ ration Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le De´ veloppement, 34398, Montpellier Cedex 5, France 2 INRAB, Institut National de Recherches Agricoles du Be´ nin, CRA Coton et Fibres, 01 BP715, Cotonou, Be´ nin Keywords Abstract AFLP and SSR markers; decentralised breeding; mass selection. In participatory plant breeding, farmers are involved in simple selection schemes that are not suitable for assessing genetic variability in the segregating populations. Correspondence We propose to use information derived from molecular marker analyses to help J.-M. Lacape, Centre Coope´ ration Internatio- monitoring such populations. In this study, we used three indicators to compare nale en Recherche Agronomique pour le genetic variability in eight genetic structures, that is three plant populations De´ veloppement, Avenue Agropolis, BP 5035, selected by farmers over five generations, three nonselected populations and 34032 Montpellier Cedex, France. two commercial varieties. The three indicators were the polymorphic locus rate, Email: [email protected] heterozygosity rate and dissimilarity index. The results highlighted that the genetic Received: 7 April 2007; revised version variability decreased more with farmers’ selection than with environmental fac- accepted: 29 September 2007. tors. The breeding process was not complete because genetic variability in the selected populations was midway between that of the nonselected populations doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00197.x and that of the commercial varieties monitored. -
REDERC (Benin).Pdf
Empowered lives. Resilient nations. THE COMMUNITY NATURE RESERVE DEVELOPMENT NETWORK (REDERC) Benin Equator Initiative Case Studies Local sustainable development solutions for people, nature, and resilient communities UNDP EQUATOR INITIATIVE CASE STUDY SERIES Local and indigenous communities across the world are advancing innovative sustainable development solutions that work for people and for nature. Few publications or case studies tell the full story of how such initiatives evolve, the breadth of their impacts, or how they change over time. Fewer still have undertaken to tell these stories with community practitioners themselves guiding the narrative. To mark its 10-year anniversary, the Equator Initiative aims to fill this gap. The following case study is one in a growing series that details the work of Equator Prize winners – vetted and peer-reviewed best practices in community-based environmental conservation and sustainable livelihoods. These cases are intended to inspire the policy dialogue needed to take local success to scale, to improve the global knowledge base on local environment and development solutions, and to serve as models for replication. Case studies are best viewed and understood with reference to ‘The Power of Local Action: Lessons from 10 Years of the Equator Prize’, a compendium of lessons learned and policy guidance that draws from the case material. Click on the map to visit the Equator Initiative’s searchable case study database. Editors Editor-in-Chief: Joseph Corcoran Managing Editor: Oliver Hughes Contributing