"Spotlight" Interview with Christina Crawford

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

H-Ukraine H-Ukraine "Spotlight" Interview with Christina Crawford Discussion published by John Vsetecka on Tuesday, July 6, 2021 H-Ukraine “Spotlight” Interview with Christina Crawford Dr. Christina E. Crawford is Assistant Professor of Modern and Contemporary Architecture in the Art History Department at Emory University and faculty of Emory’s Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies Program. H-Ukraine: Not only are you a historian of architecture, but you are also a licensed architect and urban designer. You have produced designs and plans for a number of buildings and municipalities both domestically and internationally. What drew you to architecture as a profession, and what made you decide to teach architectural history? CC: I have always loved buildings and dreamed about becoming an architect from a pretty young age. I grew up in Maine in a house built in 1825 that provided countless spooky corners to explore and that sparked my imagination about who and what inhabited it before me. In college, I double majored in Architecture and Russian & Eastern European Studies (I’ll explain that below). I crafted a senior project that worked for both majors: a written thesis about the construction of the first line of the Moscow Metro in 1935, and a design for a contemporary Moscow Metro station. The project won a big prize at graduation—validation to pursue these disparate interests in tandem—but it took me a long time to figure out how to make a career of it. After serving as a Vice Consul in the US Consulate in St. Petersburg, Russia for a year (interviewing for and adjudicating US visas, a truly awful job), I went to architecture school at the Harvard Graduate School of Design (GSD) and then practiced as a licensed architect in Boston for nearly a decade while also teaching architectural history as an adjunct at Northeastern University—really, just for fun. In the end, I enjoyed being in the classroom more than I enjoyed fighting with contractors on job sites. I returned to Harvard for a PhD in architectural history with a focus on early Soviet architecture and planning. There is no question that my time as a working architect influences the questions I ask as an architectural historian. H-Ukraine: I remember first coming across your work when doing some research on the Kharkiv Tractor Plant (KhTZ), and you graciously replied to an email of mine asking for more information about the factory newspaper Tempo. It was so wonderful to meet someone else who was as passionate about tractors and the sotsgorod as me! When did you become interested in Soviet history, and what made you decide to study Soviet architecture and planning? CC: I’ve been interested in these ideas and visiting sites built during the early Soviet period for a long time. I was an exchange student in Krasnodar with a Russian family in the final year of the USSR—a totally life-changing experience. I learned the language and culture from my Russian family, trial by fire, and am still close with them. Of course, 1990-91 was a tumultuous year. Quite a few of my exchange cohort, who experienced the Soviet Union collapsing in real-time, ended up studying Soviet history in college. And as for my focus on Soviet architecture and planning: well, I know from experience that English-language literature on Soviet architecture and planning is truly sparse. At the Harvard GSD (the top-ranked architecture school internationally, taken as just one notable example), the only projects from the socialist world taught (if any are at all) are so-called paper Citation: John Vsetecka. H-Ukraine "Spotlight" Interview with Christina Crawford . H-Ukraine. 07-06-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/4555727/discussions/7904172/h-ukraine-spotlight-interview-christina-crawford Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Ukraine projects: visionary avant-garde designs, never built. Why don’t we know more about the material spaces that contained the lives of Soviet citizens for so much of the 20th century? Because of my background in practice, I am particularly interested in those built projects. Environments constructed in Soviet times reveal viable alternatives to the architecture and cities built under capitalism. H-Ukraine: Your forthcoming book with Cornell University Press,Spatial Revolution: Architecture and Planning in the Early Soviet Union (out in February 2022 from Cornell University Press), is a comparative study of Soviet architecture in three major industrial areas in the Soviet Union. Can you tell us a little more about this project and where Ukraine (specifically Kharkiv) fits into your larger focus on space, revolution, and socialist design? CC: Spatial Revolution is the first comparative parallel study of Soviet architecture and planning to create a narrative arc across the whole Soviet Union. My narrative binds together three critical industrial- residential projects in Baku, Magnitogorsk, and Kharkiv, built during the first fifteen years of the Soviet era and followed attentively worldwide, particularly following the collapse of capitalist markets in 1929. I originally planned to write my whole dissertation (on which the book is based) on the architecture and planning of the Ukrainian Soviet capital of Kharkiv from 1919-34 but ended up wanting to tell a broader story about construction during Soviet industrialization. The Kharkiv Tractor Factory is the last of my three sites—it is the culminating success story of architectural standardization. The early Soviet Union was an incredibly exciting context for architects and planners. The world was being remade, and there was a strong belief at all levels of Soviet power that space was a critical tool to enact societal transformation. I wanted to better understand the tasks posed to designers both by the Soviet state and from within the discipline, and to immerse myself in that time. To do that, I had to utilize my whole toolkit—design background, academic preparation, and language skills—to suss out the origin story of Soviet space, and specifically, to dig deeply in the archives. What I found— and this didn’t surprise me, as a former practitioner—was that on sites far from Moscow local designers and clients had a great deal of freedom to experiment, but that they also suffered from the extreme pressures of schedule (timelines arbitrarily assigned), labor shortages, and material inadequacies. Despite these difficulties, industrial-residential sites were built in the 1920s and ‘30s, and they established practices like architectural standardization and centralized planning that persisted throughout the Soviet period. H-Ukraine: An important aspect of your work, including your new book, is the role of outside experts in the construction of Soviet industrial sites. Architects, engineers, and construction specialists from places such as the United States, Canada, and Germany, among other locales, were integral in constructing many of the industrial sites you write about. For those who might not know about the role of these outside experts, can you tell us more about the kinds of roles they had in the Soviet Union? Why did these people leave their home countries to go to the Soviet Union and help build socialism? In what ways does this exchange of intellectual and architectural knowledge help us see beyond the ideological divides of the time? CC: Each site investigated for Spatial Revolution was a node in a global network developed at the beginning of the 20th century that freely shared experts, technologies, and materials. Ideas, both Citation: John Vsetecka. H-Ukraine "Spotlight" Interview with Christina Crawford . H-Ukraine. 07-06-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/4555727/discussions/7904172/h-ukraine-spotlight-interview-christina-crawford Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Ukraine spatial and social in nature, circulated even more readily between these sites and the capitalist West, definitively upsetting common Cold War assumptions about Soviet isolationism. The Kharkiv Tractor Factory, for example, was built on a modified design from Stalingrad that was drafted in Detroit by American architects and engineers. Some of these stories also ended up inDetroit-Moscow-Detroit: Soviet-American Architectural Exchanges, 1917-1945, a book that I’m co-editing with colleagues Claire Zimmerman (University of Michigan) and Jean-Louis Cohen (NYU) (forthcoming 2023). The essays in that book propose that capitalist and communist built environments in the twentieth century were not diametrically opposed but were, on certain sites, co-produced in a period of intense technical exchange between the two world wars, and particularly during the first Five-Year Plan. US-based architecture and engineering firms, struggling during the Great Depression, were hired by the Soviet government to jump-start heavy industrialization in the largely agricultural country. Detroit architecture firm Albert Kahn, Inc. alone set in motion over 500 Soviet industrial construction projects and trained over 300 Soviet designers, technicians, and draftsmen in American methods of design and implementation in their collaboration with the Soviets between 1929 and 1932. By the end of 1932, most American construction experts had returned to the US, just in time to assist in the United States’ New Deal capital construction boom. Many technicians, engineers, and architects who made the trek to the USSR and back were the subjects of national journalistic coverage; many wrote tell-all memoirs of their own, chronicling their Soviet adventures and imparting lessons learned. My chapter for the book is a close reading of a selection of those “Red Memoirs”—they are amazing. H-Ukraine: You are currently working on a new project that examines interwar exchanges of housing expertise between the US and Europe. Can you tell us more about this new project and the way that transnational exchanges of architectural and urban ideas functioned in the interwar period? CC: My new project, Atlanta Housing Interplay, shares conceptual framing and method with Spatial Revolution andDetroit-Moscow-Detroit.
Recommended publications
  • Petroleum Geology and Resources of the Dnieper-Donets Basin, Ukraine and Russia
    Petroleum Geology and Resources of the Dnieper-Donets Basin, Ukraine and Russia By Gregory F. Ulmishek U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2201-E U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Version 1.0, 2001 This publication is only available online at: http://geology.cr.usgs.gov/pub/bulletins/b2201-e/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Manuscript approved for publication July 3, 2001 Published in the Central Region, Denver, Colorado Graphics by Susan Walden and Gayle M. Dumonceaux Photocomposition by Gayle M. Dumonceaux Contents Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Abstract.......................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 2 Province Overview ....................................................................................................................... 2 Province Location and Boundaries................................................................................. 2 Tectono-Stratigraphic Development .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Schlögel: Toward a Holistic View of Ukraine Serhiy Bilenky
    Document generated on 09/28/2021 11:28 p.m. East/West Journal of Ukrainian Studies Karl Schlögel: Toward a Holistic View of Ukraine Serhiy Bilenky Empire, Colonialism, and Famine in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries Volume 8, Number 1, 2021 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1077130ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.21226/ewjus648 See table of contents Publisher(s) Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies University of Alberta ISSN 2292-7956 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this review Bilenky, S. (2021). Review of [Karl Schlögel: Toward a Holistic View of Ukraine]. East/West, 8(1), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.21226/ewjus648 ©, 2021 East/West: Journal of Ukrainian Studies This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Review Essay: Karl Schlögel: Toward a Holistic View of Ukraine 241 Review Essay Karl Schlögel: Toward a Holistic View of Ukraine Serhiy Bilenky Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, Toronto Office, University of Alberta Karl Schlögel. Ukraine: A Nation on the Borderland. Translated by Gerrit Jackson, Reaktion Books, 2018. 288 pp. Illustrations. Further Reading. £25.00, cloth. I. IMAGINING UKRAINE The Ukraine will one day become a new Greece; the beautiful climate of this country, the gay disposition of the people, their musical inclination, and the fertile soil will all awaken.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of the SIVERSKYI DONETS BASIN and RELATED RISKS UNDER MILITARY OPERATIONS Technical Report
    STATE OF THE SIVERSKYI DONETS BASIN AND RELATED RISKS UNDER MILITARY OPERATIONS Technical report 3 Contents INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................................5 BASIN, WATER USE AND CHANGES OVER THE PERIOD OF HOSTILITIES ...................................................................7 ASSESSMENT OF WATER BODIES IN THE NON-GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED AREAS .........................................14 SURFACE WATER STATUS AND ITS CHANGES BASED ON THE MONITORING DATA .............................................20 HAZARD AND PREDICTED CONSEQUENCES OF ACCIDENTS.......................................................................................33 FURTHER STEPS: SURFACE WATERS ................................................................................................................................39 Dedicating the monitoring system to surface water quality ......................................................................................39 Analysis of sources and consequences of human-made accidents and emergency response measures .....42 GROUNDWATER STATUS .......................................................................................................................................................44 COAL MINE FLOODING AND ITS CAUSES ..........................................................................................................................54 FURTHER STEPS: GROUNDWATERS...................................................................................................................................61
    [Show full text]
  • Kharkiv, EWJUS, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2020
    Borderland City: Kharkiv Volodymyr Kravchenko University of Alberta Translated from Ukrainian by Marta Olynyk1 Abstract: The article attempts to identify Kharkiv’s place on the mental map of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, and traces the changing image of the city in Ukrainian and Russian narratives up to the end of the twentieth century. The author explores the role of Kharkiv in the symbolic reconfiguration of the Ukrainian-Russian borderland and describes how the interplay of imperial, national, and local contexts left an imprint on the city’s symbolic space. Keywords: Kharkiv, city, region, image, Ukraine, Russia, borderland. harkiv is the second largest city in Ukraine after Kyiv. Once (1920-34), K it even managed to replace the latter in its role of the capital of Ukraine. Having lost its metropolitan status, Kharkiv is now an important transport hub and a modern megapolis that boasts a greater number of universities and colleges than any other city in Ukraine. Strategically located on the route from Moscow to the Crimea, Kharkiv became the most influential component of the historical Ukrainian-Russian borderland, which has been a subject of symbolic and political reconfiguration and reinterpretation since the middle of the seventeenth century. These aspects of the city’s history have attracted the attention of numerous scholars (Bagalei and Miller; Iarmysh et al.; Masliichuk). Recent methodological “turns” in the humanities and social sciences shifted the focus of urban studies from the social reality to the city as an imagined social construct and to urban mythology and identity (Arnold; Emden et al.; Low; Nilsson; Westwood and Williams).
    [Show full text]
  • Laravel Mpdf
    7 Day Kyiv/Kharkiv tour Day 1 Arrival to Kyiv Transfer to hotel Time for leisure HIGHLIGHTS: Kyiv city, Day 2 Breakfast at the hotel Inspection of Kyiv Universities. Kyiv sightseeing tour (duration 3 hours). You will see the most popular tourist sights, including the ancient Golden Gates, magnificent St. Sofia Cathedral and the dazzling St. Michel’s Golden-Domed Cathedral. You will visit one of the most beautiful Orthodox churches of the world, the St. Vladimir Cathedral. Moreover, you will admire the Dnieper River, the Kyiv bridges from Khreshchatik Park. We are sure that you will fall in love with Kyiv after this tour! Back to hotel Free time Day 3 Breakfast at the hotel Check-out from hotel Inspection of Kyiv Universities Kyiv aviation museum tour (duration: 3 hours) Explore a unique collection of airliners, fighters, bombers, helicopters and support aircraft on an extremely interesting guided tour of the Kyiv State Aviation Museum. During this tour, you will: Visit one of the biggest historical and technical museums of Ukraine. Learn interesting facts about aviation from the Soviet times until present days. Get inside the aircraft and sit in the pilot’s seat of some of them. Explore the huge territory of the museum that counts with over 70 exhibits. See some rare models, including MiG-15 UTI and the first production aircraft TU 104 17:00 transfer to the railway station 18:00 departure to Kharkiv by Intercity train 22:41 arrival to Kharkiv Transfer to hotel, accommodation HIGHLIGHTS: Kyiv aviation museum, Kharkiv, Day 4 Breakfast at the hotel Inspection of Kharkiv Universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitor's Programme Kharkiv and Kyiv
    Monday, 16 September (for Belgian participants) Arrival in Kyiv (transfer airport-train station) Train to Kharkiv (option #1 18.02-22.47 or option #2 21.20-06.42 (night train) Tuesday, 17 September 11.00- 13.00 – City tour with the artist Polina Karpova [+380(93)043 82 85] meeting at Derzhprom, Freedom square 5/1 13.00-14.00 – Lunch 14.00-16.30 – visiting Biennale locations (YermilovCentre and Observatory of the Institute of Astronomy, Freedom square 4) 18.00 – Opening of the Biennale (Derzhprom, Freedom square 5/1) 19.00-20.30 – welcome-drink at the Hotel Kharkiv (Freedom square 7) 21.00 – after party at the DK Arteria (Chernyshevska st. 13) Wednesday, 18 September 10.00-11.00 – Breakfast with the curators of the Biennale (meeting place TBC) 11.00-13.00 – visiting Biennale locations (Botanical garden, Klochkovskaya st. 52) 13.00-14.00 – Lunch (Nonni Bertoni, Chernyshevska st. 4) 14.00-15.00 – Visiting AzaNiziMaza meeting the artist Mykola Kolomiets (AzaNiziMaza, Chernyshevska st. 4) 16.00-17.00 – Meeting artist Volodymyr Kohut (Municipal Gallery, Chernyshevska st. 15) 19.00 - Discussion (Kharkiv Literature Museum, Bahaliia st. 6) Thursday 19 September 10.00-12.00 – visiting Biennale locations (Kharkiv Art Museum, Zhon Myronosyts st. 11) 12.00-13.00 – Meeting the artist Andrii Dostliev (Municipal Gallery, Chernyshevska st. 15) 13.00-14.00 – Lunch Train to Kyiv option #1 15.10-21.49 or option #2 23.16-06.14 Friday 20, September 11.00-12.00 – visiting the National Art Museum of Ukraine (6 Mykhaila Hrushevskoho str.) meeting the Senior Research Fellow Daryna Yakymova [tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Georesources and Environment Geological Hazards During
    International Journal of IJGE 2018 4(4): 187-200 Georesources and Environment http://ijge.camdemia.ca, [email protected] Available at http://ojs.library.dal.ca/ijge Geotechnical Engineering and Construction Geological Hazards During Construction and Operation of Shallow Subway Stations and Tunnels by the Example of the Kharkiv Metro (1968–2018) Viacheslav Iegupov*, Genadiy Strizhelchik, Anna Kupreychyk, Artem Ubiyvovk Department of Geotechnics and Underground Structures, Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 40 Sumska Street, Kharkiv, Ukraine Abstract: Scientific, technical and practical problems have been considered in relation to geological hazards during construction and operation of metro objects such as shallow subway stations and tunnels. Analysis of five decades of the experience of construction and subsequent operation of the Kharkiv metro in rough engineering and geological conditions by construction of tunnels at shallow depths under the existing urban development allowed detecting and systematizing a set of the most essential adverse conditions, processes and phenomena. The main geological hazards are related to the expansion of quicksands, possibility of “flotation” of the underground structures, barrage effect, subsidence of the soil body by long-term dewatering, undermining of the built-in territories and difficulties by tunneling in technogenic fill-up grounds when crossing ravines and gullies. Most problems occur in the territories with a high groundwater level: geological risks in these areas increase, and serious incidents occur by sudden adverse changes of hydrodynamic conditions. Zones of high, medium and low geological hazards have been identified. Geological hazards have been defined at the section planned for extension of the metro line, for which calculations of the affluent value were made based on the barrage effect of tunnels on the groundwater flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiological Conditions in the Dnieper River Basin
    RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORTS SERIES Radiological Conditions in the Dnieper River Basin Assessment by an international expert team and recommendations for an action plan IAEA SAFETY RELATED PUBLICATIONS IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Under the terms of Article III of its Statute, the IAEA is authorized to establish or adopt standards of safety for protection of health and minimization of danger to life and property, and to provide for the application of these standards. The publications by means of which the IAEA establishes standards are issued in the IAEA Safety Standards Series. This series covers nuclear safety, radiation safety, transport safety and waste safety, and also general safety (i.e. all these areas of safety). The publication categories in the series are Safety Fundamentals, Safety Requirements and Safety Guides. Safety standards are coded according to their coverage: nuclear safety (NS), radiation safety (RS), transport safety (TS), waste safety (WS) and general safety (GS). Information on the IAEA’s safety standards programme is available at the IAEA Internet site http://www-ns.iaea.org/standards/ The site provides the texts in English of published and draft safety standards. The texts of safety standards issued in Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish, the IAEA Safety Glossary and a status report for safety standards under development are also available. For further information, please contact the IAEA at P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria. All users of IAEA safety standards are invited to inform the IAEA of experience in their use (e.g. as a basis for national regulations, for safety reviews and for training courses) for the purpose of ensuring that they continue to meet users’ needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology
    ISSN 2617-2909 (print) Journal of Geology, ISSN 2617-2119 (online) Geography and Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology Geology, 29(3), 539–549. Journal home page: geology-dnu-dp.ua doi: 10.15421/112049 Anastasia A. Klieshch, Nadiya V. Maksymenko Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology, 29 (3), 539–549. Positional-dynamic territorial structure of the urban landscape Anastasia A. Klieshch, Nadiya V. Maksymenko V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine, [email protected] Received: 09.05.2020 Abstract. The knowledge of landscapes’ positional - dynamic structure enabled us Received in revised form: 19.05.2020 to include it in the work on urban landscape and ecological planning, with its own Accepted: 25.05.2020 specifics as environmental management objects. The aim is to create cartographic models of a positional-dynamic territorial structure of Kharkiv landscape to ensure a balanced use of nature in environmental management. Methods: a positional-dynamic structure of urban landscape was selected by compiling and analyzing cartographic works of landscape strips, tiers and districts. Territorial configuration of different types of landscape strips were identified and established based on the classical scheme of landscape locations typology by water-geochemical regime proposed by B. Polynov and supplemented by M. Glazovska, which includes 9 main types. Technically, synthesis of parameters combinations and determination of the territories affiliation to certain types of landscape strips was carried out using spatial analysis tools (in particular, reclassification and raster calculator) of initial data on morphometric relief parameters in ArcGIS.Results . A set of qualitative parameters is proposed, based on the characteristics of each type of landscape strips by which they can be identified.Composition and territorial configuration of positional-dynamic landscape strips of the urban landscape are established as a result of systematization and processing of geodata parametric features of the water-geochemical regime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fluvial Archive of the Middle and Lower Dnieper (A Review)
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 81 (3-4): 339-355 (2002) The fluvial archive of the Middle and Lower Dnieper (a review) A.V. Matoshko1, P.F. Gozhik2 & A.S. Ivchenko3 1 Corresponding author, Institute of Geological Sciences, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 55B Gonchara Street, 01054, Kiev. Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected] 2 P.F.Gozhik. Institute of Geological Sciences, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 55B Gonchara Street, 01054, Kiev. Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected] 3 A.S.Ivchenko. Institute of Geography, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 44, 3 Volodymyrska Street, 01034, Kiev. Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected] r ; Manuscript received: November 2000; accepted: January 2002 Abstract Information about the morphology and alluvial sediments of the Dnieper Valley is reviewed. The Dnieper Valley originated in the Late Miocene. The Middle Dnieper Valley is an intercontinental alluvial basin and the Lower Dnieper Valley is a shallow canyon that ends with a delta. Identification of the alluvial dynamic fades (channel, overbank, abandoned channel) is crucial for stratigraphical analysis. The dynamic fades form regular sequences - alluvial suites that combine into series. Individual suites and series are characterized by their mode of occurrence, fades composition, lithological features and expression in the modern landscape. Their stratigraphic position is established with reference to index beds and palaeontological, geochrono- logical and archaeological research, allowing them to be correlated along the valley. Correlation between different parts of the Dnieper system uses a combination of fades and geomorphological analyses, whereas correlation with other river systems makes use of mammalian and molluscan biostratigraphy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quiet Settlement of the Ukrainian Crisis
    Special Issue 2 A Quiet Settlement of the Ukrainian Crisis By Mikio Haruna Author Mikio Haruna Developments in Ukraine following the political upheaval in February 2014 continue to affect international relations. After anti-government protests culminated in the fall of President Viktor Yanukovych’s administration and the formation of a pro-Western interim government, Russia sent its special operation forces, Spetsnaz, to recapture the strategically important Crimean Peninsula. And with the declaration of a sovereign and independent Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Russia effectively annexed the region as Russian territory. Ukraine is still facing uprisings and riots by ethnic Russian residents in the eastern and southern regions secretly supported by Russia, and many have occupied government buildings. Even after the newly elected President Petro Poroshenko’s government started, the situation in Ukraine, thus, remains tumultuous. It is the first time since the collapse of the Soviet Union ended the Cold War that a specific region of a former Soviet republic has broken away and declared independence, effectively being annexed to Russia. The Western bloc, including the United States, Western Europe, and Japan, has expressed grave concern over the situation and has imposed economic sanctions against Russia. In response, Russia deployed more than 50,000 troops around the Ukrainian border and has been backing pro-Russian movements inside Ukraine. This has led to continued confrontation between the US and Russia, and there is currently no sign of a resolution to this situation. This paper will analyze whether the world is entering a new Cold War era, how China will respond to the Ukrainian situation, what kind of impact the Ukrainian problem will have on East Asia, and how Japan should address the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • I from KAMCHATKA to GEORGIA the BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT
    FROM KAMCHATKA TO GEORGIA THE BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT AND EARLY SOVIET SPATIAL PRACTICE by Robert F. Crane B.A., Georgia State University, 2001 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 2005 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2013 i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DEITRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Robert F. Crane It was defended on March 27, 2013 and approved by Atillio Favorini, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts Kathleen George, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts Vladimir Padunov, PhD, Professor, Slavic Languages and Literature Dissertation Advisor: Bruce McConachie, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts ii Copyright © by Robert Crane 2013 iii FROM KAMCHATKA TO GEORGIA THE BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT AND EARLY SOVIET SPATIAL PRACTICE Robert Crane, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2013 The Blue Blouse movement (1923-1933) organized thousands of workers into do-it-yourself variety theatre troupes performing “living newspapers” that consisted of topical sketches, songs, and dances at workers’ clubs across the Soviet Union. At its peak the group claimed more than 7,000 troupes and 100,000 members. At the same time that the movement was active, the Soviet state and its citizens were engaged in the massive project of building a new society reflecting the aims of the Revolution. As Vladimir Paperny has argued, part of this new society was a new spatial organization, one that stressed the horizontal over the
    [Show full text]