DOCSLIB.ORG

Polygon“, „Pašin Brdo“ Und „Vra[T]Ca“

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Polygon“, „Pašin Brdo“ Und „Vra[T]Ca“ Austrian Society for Fortification Research - OeGF Stated Destruction of Austro-Hungarian Fortification around the City of Sarajevo with a Focus on the Objects „Polygon“, „Pašin brdo“ und „Vra[t]ca“. The aim of this report is to give an overview about the very negative development regarding the state of preservation of Austro‐Hungarian fortification around the city of Sarajevo. The site inspection of the forts Polygon, Pasin brdo and Vratca on the 11th respectively 12th of October this year and the disover of evident loss of substance lead the author to write this report. The survey of fort Vraca was done during an excursion that was part of the symposium „Civil‐military Cooperation regarding Cultural Property Protection in Crisis Response and its aftermath“. All the mentioned objects have been surveyed by the author in the year 2011, some of them in 2013 as well. Further on, documentations done by fortification experts from Germany (2018), Slovenia (2014) and the Netherlands (2009/10) could be analysed for this report. Among those three objects only fort Vratca – as part of the „Spomen‐Park Vraca“ ‐ is listed as national monument (BiH). [former] Fort N° IV „Pasin brdo“ Mountain fort partly with armor of a type designed especially for the protection of the capital Sarajevo. In fact this type of forts was realized only around this city. It was built between 1888 and 1889 as the first of the four "major girdle‐forts" and formed the northeastern cornerstone of the defensive belt. It is an early example of an armored fortification built by the former Habsburg Monarchy and one of only five forts in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which included an armored battery. The general design came from the pen of the then general inspector of fortification engineers Daniel Baron of Salis‐Soglio. As the first realized example Pašin brdo formed the prototypical scheme for the four main forts around Sarajevo. This fortification was partially rebuilt in the years 1897‐1898. E.g. the two rotatable observation cupolas were installed above the existing caponiers on the lateral sides. Fort Pašin brdo hasn’t been involved in fighting during the First World War. The Second World War and the siege of Sarajevo (during the Bosnian War) survived it largely undamaged. Importance: 1. It is, despite the loss of substance during the past ten years, one of the best preserved fortifications from Austro‐Hungarian times in Bosnia and Herzegovina. 1 Austrian Society for Fortification Research - OeGF 2. In contrast to the forts Vratca and Polygon, no structural changes were made to Pašin brdo. That means it is preserved in an authentic way. Thus, in addition to the two armored cupolas of the mortar battery, all the ceiling constructions (including the steel elements) from the construction period are preserved, or at least recognizable. 3. Pašin brdo is located in a scenic location. From Sarajevo it is within walking distance or easily accessible by car. Thus, it has great tourist potential. In the immediate vicinity the former guardhouse Gradonj can be reached. This object was renovated about ten years ago and a tourist‐museum use was fed. Fig. 1: Tin roof on the battery block, May 2011 Fig. 2: Completely removed in October 2018 Fig. 3: Inside right caponier, May 2011 Fig. 4: The same in October 2018: Destruction on masonry and missing armor plates Destruction: At fort Pašin brdo, two developments can be identified, each aiming to get the recoverable metal (iron or steel): 1. Most visible is the removal of the sheet metal covering. This was almost complete above the central part (battery block) of the accommodation building (see Fig. 1) and 2 Austrian Society for Fortification Research - OeGF partially preserved in the area of the two flanking elements. As can be seen in Fig. 2, the tin roof is now completely missing. In addition to the historical value ‐ this tin roof was one of the last surviving all over Bosnia and Herzegovina ‐ the lack of water‐ bearing layer leads to an accelerated deterioration of the fort. 2. Destruction of the masonry to obtain the high‐quality steel armor. In the area of the right flank of the accommodation building (access corridor) and the right caponier, stones were broken out of the masonry (see Fig. 4), in order to subsequently win the steel plates. These were quite well preserved during the documentation in 2011 (see Fig. 3). In addition to the loss of these essential armor, these "artificially induced" damages to the masonry also force further decay. Conversely, subsequent consolidations of such damage are associated with high effort and costs. In addition to the active destruction by the people, the object also suffers from the unrestrained proliferating vegetation. Above all, birch trees, which have settled on the walls or grow out of the gargoyles, are destroying the masonry, which in turn means that more moisture can penetrate. All vegetation within the perimeter walls should be removed immediately. Locking the object, which is only accessible through a gate, would at least make further destruction more difficult. [former] Interval fort „Polygon“ Polygon was built in the years 1888‐1889, so parallel to the fort IV Pašin brdo. On this object again, general Salis‐Soglio took significant influence on the draft. In contrast to the other fortifications around Sarajevo, Polygon is an example of the so‐called platform forts, which were mainly built as part of the fortresses Bileća, Trebinje and Mostar. It is the best preserved and also in its appearance largely unchanged fortification object both around Sarajevo as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The only change that is even difficult to recognize from the outside is the covering of the courtyard and the entrance gate. In the area of the right flank and the gorge caponier, damage to the masonry can be detected, which may be due to a shelling in the Second World War or the time of the Bosnian war. Fig. 5: Entrance of the fort and gorge caponier, May 2011 Fig. 6: Growing vegetation, October 2018 3 Austrian Society for Fortification Research - OeGF Importance: 1. Polygon is the best preserved among all the fortifications built under the administration of the Hapsburg Monarchy between 1878 and 1914 in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This concerns both authenticity, the well‐preserved building structure, as well as the many preserved details (outer and inner entrance gate, tin roof, lightning protection system, etc.). 2. This fortification, together with Pašin brdo, was the first fortification to be completed in Sarajevo in 1889. It is the last realized example of the so‐called platform fort type in Bosnia and Herzegovina. 3. Like the "Bijela Tabija", Polygon was situated above remains of the Ottoman city walls. It can therefore be assumed that – especially under the platform ‐ older structures have been preserved. Fig. 7: A window with preserved steel shutters, May 2011 Fig. 8: The same window in October 2018 Destruction: Comparable to Pašin brdo fort, Polygon also looks abandoned. The object is more overgrown compared to the first ascent in 2011 (see Figures 5 and 6). Since Polygon is still in military possession, the loss of substance here is not so evident, in comparison to Vraca and Pašin brdo. However, the loss of the two bullet‐proof steel shutters (see Fig. 7 and 8) close to the main entrance is particularly painful. These elements were, to the knowledge of the author, the last around Sarajevo and probably the last surviving examples of this kind in Bosnia and Herzegovina! [former] Fort N°II „Vratca“ The fort number II “Vratca” or Vraca formed the southwestern stronghold in the defensive line around Sarajevo. It was built in the years 1897‐1898 under the responsibility of the captain (of fortification engineers) Erwin Suchanek. The pattern of the fort is the same as Pašin brdo, which was built ten years earlier. However, Vratca features an asymmetrical floor plan adapted to the tactical function and topography of the site. 4 Austrian Society for Fortification Research - OeGF Fig. 9: The main entrance gate, May 2011 Fig. 10: The reconstructed wall and the new steel gate, October 2018 This fortification has been structurally altered since its construction. Presumably in connection with the realization of the "Spomen‐Park Vraca" almost all ceilings were replaced by reinforced concrete ceilings.1 At the same time the subdivision of the ground and upper floor was changed. In order to improve the (natural) lighting of the rooms upstairs, openings for four skylights were cut out in the top ceiling. Finally, a new entrance door was cut out of the free standing defendable walls of the front battery. Despite these massive interventions within the building structure, the external appearance was only slightly changed. Like Pašin brdo, Vratca has little (visible) damage from the time of the Bosnian war. Fig. 11: Courtyard with gorge battery, May 2011 Fig. 12: The same in October 2018 Noteworthy in this object were the numerous, until about 2014 received details. In addition to the two armored cupolas for each a 15cm mortar / mark 1880 were the two rotatable observation posts (see Fig. 13), the steel shutters for the gun embrasures both in the front and gorge battery (see Fig. 11) and many original gates on the ground floor of the barracks building and the front‐side caponier. The steel shutters and the wooden gates studded with sheet metal (see Fig. 15) were the last in Bosnia and Herzegovina to be preserved. The two stolen observation turrets were among the last four (!) Surviving of the entire Habsburg monarchy, leaving 50% of this type irretrievably lost. Vratca is the only fortification around Sarajevo, which dates back to the time of the Austro‐ Hungarian Monarchy and ‐ as part of the memorial site ‐ is a listed building.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prostorni Plan Kantona Sarajevo Za Period Od 2003
    Bosna i Hercegovina Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine KANTON SARAJEVO PROSTORNI PLAN KANTONA SARAJEVO ZA PERIOD OD 2003. DO 2023. GODINE 1. Ciljevi prostornog razvoja 2. Projekcija prostornog razvoja i prostorni sistemi 3. Odluka o provođenju prostornog plana Nosilac pripreme: VLADA KANTONA SARAJEVO Nosilac izrade: ZAVOD ZA PLANIRANJE RAZVOJA KANTONA SARAJEVO Sarajevo, avgust/kolovoz 2006. godine . A Tekstualni dio Plana 2 . Na osnovu člana 12. stav 1. tačka f) i l), člana 18. stav 1. tačka b) Ustava Kantona Sarajevo („Službene novine Kantona Sarajevo“ broj 1/96, 2/96, 3/96, 16/97, 14/00, 4/01 i 28/04) i člana 47. stav 1. Zakona o prostornom uređenju („Službene novine Kantona Sarajevo“ broj 7/05), Skupština Kantona Sarajevo, na sjednici održanoj 31.08. 2006. godine, donijela je Prostorni plan Kantona Sarajevo za period od 2003. do 2023. godine 1. CILJEVI PROSTORNOG RAZVOJA 1.1. OPĆI CILJEVI • Humani razvoj – osnovna orjentacija Koncept ciljeva u punoj mjeri je komplementaran i naslanja se na koncepciju humanog razvoja, kao holističkog pristupa razvoju koji u prvi plan stavlja čovjeka, sa njegovim sposobnostima, napredak u blagostanju stanovništva, održavanje ravnoteže u prirodnoj sredini, kao i proces modernizacije institucija te društveno političkih odnosa. To je razvoj koji uključuje sve aspekte (prostorni, ekonomski, okolinski, društveni i socijalni) i sve aktere razvoja (javni sektor, privatni sektor, civilno društvo, lokalnu zajednicu, pojedinca); to je stalan proces širenja izbora i mogućnosti ljudi da dostignu određeni nivo blagostanja. • Poštivanje ljudskih prava Univerzalna ljudska prava trebaju se ostvariti na harmonično organizovanom prostoru u sveukupnom razvojnom procesu demokratije koja se u društvu poima kao sloboda.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Report Part 1
    Alcatraz Island Golden Gate National Recreation Area Physical History PRE-EUROPEAN (Pre-1776) Before Europeans settled in San Francisco, the area was inhabited by Native American groups including the Miwok, in the area north of San Francisco Bay (today’s Marin County), and the Ohlone, in the area south of San Francisco Bay (today’s San Francisco peninsula). Then, as today, Alcatraz had a harsh environment –strong winds, fog, a lack of a fresh water source (other than rain or fog), rocky terrain –and there was only sparse vegetation, mainly grasses. These conditions were not conducive to living on the island. These groups may have used the island for a fishing station or they may have visited it to gather seabird eggs since the island did provide a suitable habitat for colonies of seabirds. However, the Miwok and Ohlone do not appear to have lived on Alcatraz or to have visibly altered its landscape, and no prehistoric archeological sites have been identified on the island. (Thomson 1979: 2, Delgado et al. 1991: 8, and Hart 1996: 4). SPANISH AND MEXICAN PERIOD (1776-1846) Early Spanish explorers into Alta California encountered the San Francisco Bay and its islands. (Jose Francisco Ortega saw the bay during his scouting for Gaspar de Portola’s 1769 expedition, and Pedro Fages described the three major islands –Angel, Alcatraz, and Yerba Buena –in his journal from the subsequent 1772 expedition.) However, the first Europeans to record their visit to Alcatraz were aboard the Spanish ship San Carlos, commanded by Juan Manuel de Ayala that sailed through the Golden Gate and anchored off Angel Island in August 1775.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Fortifications on the Coast of the Pacific Ocean
    Scientific Journal of Latvia University of Agriculture Landscape Architecture and Art, Volume 10, Number 10 The European fortifications on the coast of the Pacific Ocean Nikolay Kasyanov, Research Institute of Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences, Moscow, Russia Abstract. In the Russian Empire during XIX and early XX centuries, fortresses were built and strengthened along the frontiers. We studied the architecture of the Far Eastern Russian cities-fortresses using as examples Nikolaevsk-on-Amur, Port Arthur (now Luishun) and mainly Vladivostok. Coastal fortresses significantly influenced the urban development of the Far Eastern cities. The architectural peculiarity of the fortress architecture at that period was associated with the transition from the brick and stone fortifications to the complex systems of monolithic reinforced concrete. In 1860, a military post with the expressive and geopolitically ambitious name "Vladivostok" ("Possess the East") was established. By the beginning of the XX century, Vladivostok became a rapidly growing city of the European culture and one of the most powerful marine fortresses in the world. The Vladivostok Fortress was an innovative project in early XX century and has distinctive features of the modern style (Art Nouveau), partly of the Russian and classical style in architecture, as well as an organic unity with the surrounding landscape. Plastic architectural masses with their non-linear shape are typical of the fortifications of Vladivostok. Vast and branching internal communication spaces link fort buildings, scattered on the surface and remote from each other. Huge, monumental forts located on the tops of mountains and fitted perfectly in the landscape are successful examples of landscape architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Terminologies
    FISH TERMINOLOGIES Monument Type Thesaurus Report Format: Hierarchical listing - class Notes: Classification of monument type records by function.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Yeardley's Fort (44Pg65)
    CHAPTER 2 YEARDLEY'S FORT (44PG65) INTRODUCTION In this chapter the fort and administrative center of Flowerdew at 44PG65 are examined in relation to town and fortification planning and the cultural behavior so displayed (Barka 1975, Brain et al. 1976, Carson et al. 1981; Barka 1993; Hodges 1987, 1992a, 1992b, 1993; Deetz 1993). To develop this information, we present the historical data pertaining to town development and documented fortification initiatives as a key part of an overall descriptive grid to exploit the ambiguity of the site phenomena and the historic record. We are not just using historic documents to perform a validation of archaeological hypotheses; rather, we are trying to understand how small-scale variant planning models evolved regionally in a trajectory away from mainstream planning ideals (Beaudry 1988:1). This helps refine our perceptions of this site. The analysis then turns to close examination of design components at the archaeological site that might reveal evidence of competence or "mental template." These are then also factored into a more balanced and meaningful cultural interpretation of the site. 58 59 The site is used to develop baseline explanatory models that are considered in a broader, multi-site context in Chapter 3. Therefore, this section will detail more robust working interpretations that help lay the foundations for the direction of the entire study. In short, learning more about this site as a representative example of an Anglo-Dutch fort/English farmstead teaches us more about many sites struggling with the same practical constraints and planning ideals that Garvan (1951) and Reps (1972) defined.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vauban Circular Walk the Vauban Circular Walk
    The Vauban Circular Walk The Vauban Circular Walk The Vauban circuit takes visitors through the historic parts of the city of Luxembourg to the points of strategic importance in one of Europe’s most impressive fortresses, through old city gates and dark casemates, across large fortified bridges to caponiers and a series of bastions. The circuit bears the name of the famous French military engineer, active during the reign of Louis XIV, Sebastien Le Prestre de Vauban (1633-1707). Appointed commissioner for fortifications at the age of just twenty-two, Vauban built or enlarged more than 160 fortresses in total. When he arrived in Luxembourg with the French enemy troops, the Spanish held sovereignty over the fortified city, which from the Middle Ages onward had been ruled by a number of foreign powers in turn. Highly experienced in warfare, Vauban was entrusted with the technical control of the siege of Luxembourg by the French in 1684. After the capture of the fortified city, he oversaw the reconstruction work on the fortress, turning it into the “Gibraltar of the North”, one of Europe's mightiest fortresses of the age. Even though the fortress was almost totally demolished (starting in 1867), the reconstruction work and the addition of forts, redoubts and barracks built by Vauban between 1685 and 1688 with the help of 3,000 labourers, earned the city View over the old town the prestige it still enjoys today. In 1994, sections of the forti- fications and the Old Town were listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site. Following the traces of Vauban (General Commissioner for Fortifications), you will discover sites that bear witness to Luxembourg’s military past, experience the medieval charm of the old Lower Town of Pfaffenthal and, from the fortified heights, enjoy breathtaking panoramic views of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • January, 1907
    .. - ,.. .... .... i'... MAJOR GENERAL JOHN F. WESTON. UNITED STATES ABXY. JOURNAL OF THE United States Cavalry Association. - .-. VOL. XVII. JANUARY, 1907. No. 63. PORT ARTHUR. BY SECOSOLIELTESAST HESRT J. REILLI’. Swosn CAVALRY.* IRST a brief description will be given of the vicinity of F Port Arthur. Running almost due north from the harbor of Port Arthur is the valley of the Lun Ho. The Lun Ho and its tributaries drain the major part of the Shuishih valley, a valley running in a general northwesterly and southeasterly direction, about three miles to the north of Port Arthur. On the shore of the harbor, to the east of the Lun Ho and separated from it by a hill, is the “Old (official) Town” of Port Arthur, while to the west of the Lun i Ho is the “New (commercial) Town.” Between two and two and a half miles from the Old Town is a continuous chain of hills running from the Lua Ho in a general form of a semi- circle to the Yellow Sea. The peaks of this chain run from *Lieutenant Reilly had the good luck to visit Port Arthur in the fall of IWS. The article is entirely the result of his own observations. All draw- ings were made by him, and he took the photos given herewith. In his manu- script names were spelled after the Japanese pronunciation. This has been changed by the JOURNAL to the orthography adopted by the War Department. 1 The article was prepared for the Second Division, General Staff, and is here reproduced by its courtesy.
    [Show full text]
  • Remaking History: Tracing Politics in Urban Space
    Remaking History: Tracing Politics in Urban Space Lejla Odobašić Novo & Aleksandar Obradović International Burch University Sarajevo 2021 Authors: Lejla Odobašić Novo & Aleksandar Obradović Publishing: International Burch University Critcal Review: Nerma Prnjavorac Cridge & Vladimir Dulović Proofreading: Adrian Pecotić Project Logo Design: Mina Stanimirović Book Layout Mina Stanimirović & Lejla Odobašić Novo EBook (URL): http://remakinghistory.philopolitics.org/index.html Date and Place: February 2021, Sarajevo Copyrights: International Burch University & Philopolitics Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without permission from the copyright holder. Repro- duction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Disclaimer: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information contained in this publication, the publisher will not assume liability for writing and any use made of the proceedings, and the presentation of the participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territo- ry, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. CIP zapis je dostupan u elektronskom katalogu Nacionalne i univerzitetske biblioteke Bosne i Hercegovine pod brojem COBISS.BH-ID 42832902 ISBN 978-9958-834-67-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE Critical Review by Nerma Prnjavorac Cridge... ..................1 Critical Review by Vladimir Dulović .................
    [Show full text]
  • Bosna I Hercegovina Federacija Bosna I Hercegovina Kanton Sarajevo OPĆINA STARI GRAD SARAJEVO
    Bosna i Hercegovina Federacija Bosna i Hercegovina Kanton Sarajevo OPĆINA STARI GRAD SARAJEVO INFORMACIJA O STANJU PROSTORNE PLANSKE DOKUMENTACIJE ZA PODRUČJE OPĆINE STARI GRAD SARAJEVO Stručna obrada: Predlagač: Služba za urbanizam Načelnik općine Decembar 2014.godine INFORMACIJA O STANJU PROSTORNE PLANSKE DOKUMENTACIJE ZA PODRUČJE OPĆINE STARI GRAD SARAJEVO I - PROSTORNA PLANSKA DOKUMENTACIJA NA PODRUČJU OPĆINE STARI GRAD SARAJEVO Na području OPĆINE STARI GRAD egzistiraju sljedeći PLANOVI PROSTORNOG UREĐENJA: - PROSTORNI PLAN KANTONA SARAJEVO za period 2003-2023.godine, (Sl.novine Kantona Sarajevo, broj 26/06 i 4/11)) - PROSTORNI PLAN POSEBNOG PODRUČJA PRIRODNOG NASLIJEĐA „VODOPAD SKAKAVAC“ (Sl.novine Kantona Sarajevo, broj 32/09). Za šire područje vodopada Skakavac donesen je Zakon o proglašenju šireg područja vodopada „Skakavac“ spomenikom prirode (Sl.novine Kantona Sarajevo, broj 11/10). - Za područje Trebevića donesen je Zakon o proglašenju zaštićenog pejzaža " Trebević" ( Sl.novine Kantona Sarajevo broj 15/14). - URBANISTIČKI PLAN Grada Sarajeva za urbano područje Sarajeva (Stari Grad, Centar, Novo Sarajevo, Novi Grad, Ilidža i Vogošća) za period 1986-2015. godine - prečišćen tekst (Sl.novine Grada Sarajeva broj 5/99 i 4/02) - REGULACIONI PLANOVI - URBANISTIČKI PROJEKTI - PROGRAM RAZVOJA GRADSKOG JEZGRA SARAJEVA (Sl.novine Kantona Sarajevo 13/00 i 7/04) II - REGULACIONI PLANOVI KOJI SU USVOJENI I KOJI SU U PRIMJENI 1. REGULACIONI PLAN „SANACIJE, KONZERVACIJE, RESTAURACIJE I REVITALIZACIJE SARAJEVSKE ČARŠIJE“ (Sl.novine Grada, broj 19/75) Korekcija Regulacionog plana “Baščaršija“ (Sl.novine Kantona Sarajevo, broj 31/07) 2. REGULACIONI PLAN PROSTORNE CJELINE „VRATNIK“ ( Sl.novine Kantona Sarajevo, broj 20/99) 3. REGULACIONI PLAN „ŠEHIDSKO SPOMEN MEZARJE KOVAČI“ (Sl.novine Kantona Sarajevo, broj 20/99) Dopune Regulacionog plana „ŠEHIDSKO SPOMEN MEZARJE KOVAČI“ (Sl.novine Kantona Sarajevo, broj 24/05) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Fhbro Heritage Character Statement
    Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario Octagonal Blockhouse Fort George HERITAGE CHARACTER STATEMENT The Octagonal Blockhouse was built in 1939, to designs by Toronto architects W.L. Somerville and Edward Carswell, as part of the reconstruction of Fort George. In the 1950s, a caponier (tunnel) was excavated to connect the blockhouse to the Powder Magazine pit. Repairs to the roof have also been undertaken. The Environment Canada Parks Service is the custodial department. See FHBRO Building Report 89-15. Reasons For Designation The Octagonal Blockhouse was designated Recognized because of its association with the 1930s philosophy of preservation and presentation of historic sites, its architectural qualities and use of traditional materials and techniques, and its contribution to the character of the fortification. During the 1930s, historic sites in Canada were developed and expanded as a result of the provision of government funding for Depression relief works programs. The philosophy of historic reconstruction employed at a number of sites in this period followed a North American pattern influenced by the reconstruction of Colonial Williamsburg. A recognition that an increase in private ownership of automobiles would generate growth in tourism encouraged the reconstruction of Fort George as a tourist destination, thereby facilitating the economic development of Niagara-on-the-Lake. The architects tended to interpret freely the historical information about the original Fort George. The rugged exterior of the reconstructed buildings represents the designers' preference for a "frontier" aesthetic - possibly derived from the appearance of the Fort York blockhouses after their exterior cladding was removed during a 1934 "restoration." The Octagonal Blockhouse, highly visible from outside the palisade, is a local landmark.
    [Show full text]
  • PREDSJEDA VAJU ĆI GRADSKOG VIJE ĆA U Jo a 4 Broj
    BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine AA Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina GRAD SARAJEVO ilri CITY OF SARAJEVO GRADSKO VIJE ĆE CITY COUNCIL Broj: 01-02-1109/16 Sarajevo, 29.06.2016. godine Na osnovu člana 26. stav 1. tačka 2. i člana 74. stav 1. Statuta Grada Sarajeva („Službene novine Kantona Sarajevo", broj 34/08 — pre čišćeni tekst), Gradsko vije će Grada Sarajeva, na 40. sjednici održanoj 29.06.2016. godine, primilo je k znanju Informaciju o nepokretnoj imovini koja je u vlasništvu Grada Sarajeva ili sa kojom Grad upravlja ili raspolaže, te nepokretnom imovinom u koju je u proteklom periodu Grad Sarajevo ulagao budžetska sredstva. ,PREDSJEDA VAJU ĆI GRADSKOG VIJE ĆA u jo A 4 Ul. Hamdije Kreševljakovi ća 3, 71000 Sarajevo, BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA Tel. ++387 33 — 208 340; Fax: ++387 33 - 208 341: www.sa ra i evo.ba BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina KANTON SARAJEVO CANTON OF SARAJEVO GRAD SARAJEVO CITY OF SARAJEVO GRADONAČELNIK MAYOR INFORMACIJA o nepokretnoj imovini koja je u vlasništvu Grada Sarajeva ili sa kojom Grad upravlja ili raspolaže, te nepokretnom imovinom u koju je u proteklom periodu Grad Sarajevo ulagao budžetska sredstva Predlagač: Gradonačelnik Obrađivač: Gradska uprava Grada Sarajeva Pravobranilaštvo Grada Sarajeva Sarajevo, juni 2016. godine Hamdije Kreševljakovi ća 3, 71000 Sarajevo, BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA Tel. ++387 33 — 208 340; 443 050, Fax: ++387 33 — 208 341 www.sarajevo.ba e-mail: [email protected] Informacija o nepokretnoj imovini koja je u vlasništvu Grada Sarajeva ili sa kojom Grad upravlja ili raspolaže, te nepokretnom imovinom u koju je u proteklom periodu Grad Sarajevo ulagao budžetska sredstva UVOD Programom rada Gradskog vije ća Grada Sarajeva za 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • CDSG Newsletter
    CDSGThe Newsletter The Coast Defense Study Group, Inc. — February 2017 Chairman’s Message CDSG Meeting and Tour Calendar Alex Hall Please advise Terry McGovern of any additions or changes at [email protected] Although it has been the general practice for a director on the board to serve as Chairman of the Board in their third year, Alfred 2017 CDSG Pre-Conference Tour Chiswell expressed his desire to concentrate his time on supporting March 26-28, 2017 the Puget Sound Coast Artillery Museum, at Fort Worden in Port Eastern New York Townsend, WA. The museum was a highlight for our last confer- Terry McGovern, [email protected] ence there and it is hoped the museum will continue to help tell the history of the coast artillery in the United States. I am therefore 2017 CDSG Annual Conference honored hold the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors, March 28 - April 2, 2017 and look forward to continuing to work with my fellow directors, New York officers, and committee chairs this year. N. Scarpulla & S. Welch, [email protected] In less than two months, our 2017 annual conference and meet- ing will be taking place. This year’s conference, touring sites of the 2017 CDSG Post-Conference Tour Harbor Defenses of New York, looks to be as varied and exciting April 2-3, 2017 as New York City itself. With so much to see, pre-conference and Camp Hero/Montauk, NY post-conference excursions are offered as well. Norm Scarpulla, Terry McGovern, [email protected] Shawn Welch, and Terry McGovern have worked tirelessly to secure access to usually restricted government and privately controlled 2018 CDSG Conference coast artillery structures.
    [Show full text]