DOCSLIB.ORG

Learning from Experience: Volume II: Lessons from the U.S. Navy's Ohio, Seawolf, and Virginia Submarine Programs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Learning from Experience: Volume II: Lessons from the U.S. Navy's Ohio, Seawolf, and Virginia Submarine Programs CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. JOHN F. SCHANK • CESSE IP • FRANK W. LACROIX • ROBERT E. MURPHY MARK V. ARENA • KRISTY N. KAMARCK • GORDON T. LEE LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE VOLUME II Lessons from the U.S. Navy’s Ohio, Seawolf, and Virginia Submarine Programs Prepared for the United States Navy Approved for public release; distribution unlimited NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE The research described in this report was prepared for the United States Navy. The research was conducted within the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community under Contract W74V8H-06-C-0002. Library of Congress Control Number: 2011939404 ISBN: 978-0-8330-5896-6 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2011 RAND Corporation Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND permissions page (http://www.rand.org/publications/ permissions.html). Published 2011 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface The successful conduct of large, complex design and construction pro- grams requires personnel with unique skills and capabilities supple- mented with practical experience in their areas of expertise. This is especially true for the design and construction of new nuclear powered submarines. Unique design and engineering skills must be nurtured and sustained and program managers at all levels must be trained and educated to create the pool of knowledge and experience to conduct a successful program.1 In the past, the growth and sustainment of key technical and management personnel in the submarine community was facilitated through numerous sequential design and acquisition programs. Personnel participated in one or more programs, gaining experience to be the leaders in future programs. Due to increases in the operational lives of submarines and the constrained defense budgets faced by most nations, new submarine programs are occurring less frequently. There are now substantial gaps between new programs, providing fewer opportunities for personnel to gain the experience needed to manage complex processes and make informed decisions. Future managers of new programs may not have the benefit of learning from the challenges faced and the issues solved in past programs. Recognizing the importance of past experience for successful program management, the Program Executive Officer for Submarines asked the RAND Corporation to develop a set of lessons learned from previous submarine programs that could help inform future program 1 See Schank et al., 2005a; Schank et al., 2007. iii iv Learning from Experience, Volume II managers. This volume describes the important lessons from the Ohio, Seawolf, and Virginia programs. Separate volumes in the series provide lessons from the United Kingdom and Australian submarine programs and a summary of the lessons learned from all three programs: • MG-1128/1-NAVY, Learning from Experience, Volume I: Lessons from the Submarine Programs of the United States, United King- dom, and Australia • MG-1128/3-NAVY, Learning from Experience, Volume III: Lessons from the United Kingdom’s Astute Submarine Program • MG-1128/4-NAVY, Learning from Experience, Volume IV: Lessons from Australia’s Collins Submarine Program. This research was conducted within the Acquisition and Technol- ogy Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Com- batant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community. For more information on the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center, see http://www.rand.org/nsrd/ndri/centers/atp.html or contact the director (contact information is provided on the web page). Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Figures ............................................................................. ix Tables .............................................................................. xi Summary .........................................................................xiii Acknowledgments ............................................................xxvii Abbreviations ...................................................................xxix CHAPTER ONE Introduction ....................................................................... 1 Organization of This Document ................................................. 3 CHAPTER TWO U.S. Nuclear Submarines Up to Ohio ......................................... 5 Historical Lessons in Submarine Acquisition ................................... 8 CHAPTER THREE Ohio Case Study .................................................................11 Background ........................................................................11 Setting the Requirements ........................................................15 Acquisition Strategy ..............................................................18 Designing and Building the Ohio-Class Submarines .........................21 New Facilities................................................................... 23 Workforce Issues ................................................................25 Quality Control Issues ........................................................ 26 Government-Furnished Equipment ......................................... 27 Design Changes .................................................................29 v vi Learning from Experience, Volume II Areas of Schedule Delays and Cost Growth .................................. 30 Schedule Delays ................................................................ 30 Cost Growth .....................................................................32 Life-Cycle Issues .................................................................. 34 Conversions to SSGN ............................................................35 Lessons from the Ohio Program ................................................ 36 CHAPTER FOUR Seawolf Case Study ............................................................. 43 Background ....................................................................... 43 Setting the Requirements ....................................................... 44 Acquisition Strategy ............................................................. 46 Designing and Building the Seawolf-Class Submarines ..................... 48 Facility and Workforce Issues .................................................51 Quality Control Issues .........................................................51 Government- and Contractor-Furnished Equipment .......................52 Design Changes .................................................................52 Areas of Schedule Delays and Cost Growth ..................................53 Life-Cycle
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Navy Columbia-Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program
    Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress Updated September 14, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41129 Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program Summary The Navy’s Columbia (SSBN-826) class ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) program is a program to design and build a class of 12 new SSBNs to replace the Navy’s current force of 14 aging Ohio-class SSBNs. Since 2013, the Navy has consistently identified the Columbia-class program as the Navy’s top priority program. The Navy procured the first Columbia-class boat in FY2021 and wants to procure the second boat in the class in FY2024. The Navy’s proposed FY2022 budget requests $3,003.0 (i.e., $3.0 billion) in procurement funding for the first Columbia-class boat and $1,644.0 million (i.e., about $1.6 billion) in advance procurement (AP) funding for the second boat, for a combined FY2022 procurement and AP funding request of $4,647.0 million (i.e., about $4.6 billion). The Navy’s FY2022 budget submission estimates the procurement cost of the first Columbia- class boat at $15,030.5 million (i.e., about $15.0 billion) in then-year dollars, including $6,557.6 million (i.e., about $6.60 billion) in costs for plans, meaning (essentially) the detail design/nonrecurring engineering (DD/NRE) costs for the Columbia class. (It is a long-standing Navy budgetary practice to incorporate the DD/NRE costs for a new class of ship into the total procurement cost of the first ship in the class.) Excluding costs for plans, the estimated hands-on construction cost of the first ship is $8,473.0 million (i.e., about $8.5 billion).
    [Show full text]
  • The Effectiveness of Canada's Navy on Escort Duty
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive The Effectiveness of Canada’s Navy on Escort Duty Skogstad, Karl Lakehead University 16 January 2015 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61467/ MPRA Paper No. 61467, posted 20 Jan 2015 09:32 UTC The Effectiveness of Canada’s Navy on Escort Duty Karl Skogstad1 January 2015 Abstract This paper examines the potential costs a country faces when it fails to develop domestic arms manufacturing. I examine these costs using the historical example of Canada’s decision to not develop domestic naval shipbuilding capacity prior to World War II. Canada’s primary naval responsibility during the war was to escort convoys be- tween the United Kingdom and North America. However its lack of advanced domestic shipbuilding capacity and congestion at Allied shipyards, meant that Canada could not obtain the relatively advanced destroyer class vessels necessary for convoy duty. Instead it had to rely on less advanced corvette class vessels, which were simple enough to be manufactured domestically. Using a unique data set, created for this project, I match convoy movements to German U-boat locations in order to examine the escort compo- sition and the number of merchant ships lost when an engagement occurred. Using this data I find that destroyers were 2.14 more effective than corvettes at preventing the loss of a merchant ship. Then, by constructing a counterfactual scenario, I find that developing a domestic ship building industry in Canada would have netted the Allies a benefit of 28.7 million 1940 Canadian dollars. JEL classification: N42, F51, F52, H56, H57 Keywords: Canadian Navy, World War II, Convoys, Domestic Arms industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Shipbuilding Expansion: the World War II Surface Combatant Experience
    Naval Shipbuilding Expansion: The World War II Surface Combatant Experience Dr. Norbert Doerry and Dr. Philip Koenig Naval Sea Systems Command David W. Taylor Lecture Series Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division June 13, 2019 From material originally presented at: SNAME Maritime Convention 2018, Providence, RI, Oct 24-26, 2018 and 16th Annual Acquisition Research Symposium, Monterey, CA, 8-9 May 2019 10/24/2018 Statement A: Approved for Release. Distribution is Unlimited. 1 Introduction • The post-Cold War “Peace Dividend” era is over • “Overt challenges to the free and open international order and the re-emergence of long- term, strategic competition between nations.” (DoD 2018) • Possibility of non-nuclear, industrial-scale war has re-emerged. What can we learn from the last time we engaged in industrial-scale war? 10/24/2018 Statement A: Approved for Release. Distribution is Unlimited. 2 U.S. Destroyer Acquisition Eras World War I Era (up to 1922) • 68 destroyers commissioned prior to U.S. entry into WW I — One would serve in WW II • 273 “Flush-Deckers” acquired in response to U.S. entry into WW I — 41 commissioned prior to end of hostilities — The rest were commissioned after WW I — 105 lost or scrapped prior to WW II, remainder served in WWII Treaty Period (1922-1936) USS Fletcher (DD 445) underway off New York, 18 July 1942 • Limitations placed on displacement, weapons, and number (www.history.navy.mil – 19-N-31245) • Torpedo tubes and 5 inch guns were the primary weapon systems • 61 destroyers in seven classes procured Pre-War (1936-1941) • Designs modified to reflect experiences of foreign navies in combat — Lend-Lease prepared industry for production ramp-up • 182 destroyers in four classes authorized • 39 in commission upon U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Always a Marine” Men’S Hoodie for Me City State Zip in the Size Indicated Below As Described in This Announcement
    MAGAZINE OF THE MARINES 4 1 0 2 LY U J Leathernwwew.mca-marcines.org/lekatherneck Happy Birthday, America Iraq 2004: Firefghts in the “City of Mosques” Riding With the Mounted Color Guard Settling Scores: The Battle to Take Back Guam A Publication of the Marine Corps Association & Foundation Cov1.indd 1 6/12/14 12:04 PM Welcome to Leatherneck Magazine’s Digital Edition July 2014 We hope you are continuing to enjoy the digital edition of Leatherneck with its added content and custom links to related information. Our commitment to expanding our digital offerings continues to refect progress. Also, access to added content is available via our website at www.mca- marines.org/leatherneck and you will fnd reading your Leatherneck much easier on smartphones and tablets. Our focus of effort has been on improving our offerings on the Internet, so we want to hear from you. How are we doing? Let us know at: [email protected]. Thank you for your continuing support. Semper Fidelis, Col Mary H. Reinwald, USMC (Ret) Editor How do I navigate through this digital edition? Click here. L If you need your username and password, call 1-866-622-1775. Welcome Page Single R New Style.indd 2 6/12/14 11:58 AM ALWAYS FAITHFUL. ALWAYS READY. Cov2.indd 1 6/9/14 10:31 AM JULY 2014, VOL. XCVII, No. 7 Contents LEATHERNECK—MAGAZINE OF THE MARINES FEATURES 10 The In-Between: Touring the Korean DMZ 30 100 Years Ago: Marines at Vera Cruz By Roxanne Baker By J.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Ellen Jukoski
    EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Academic Degrees: Ed.D. The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee. Curriculum and Instruction, Higher Education, 1983. Dissertation: “Accreditation of Selected Non-Traditional Colleges and Universities.” M.A. College of St. Rose, Albany, New York. English, 1979. M.S. State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York. Curriculum Planning and Development, 1974. B.A. College of St. Rose, Albany, New York. English/Secondary Education. Cum Laude, 1973. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPERIENCE: 1995-Present: President, Mitchell College, New London, Connecticut 1994-1995: Acting President and Academic Vice President, Mitchell College, New London, Connecticut 1990-1995: Academic Vice President and Dean of the College, Mitchell College, New London, Connecticut 1988-1990: Assistant Vice President for Academic Instruction, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, Connecticut 1985-1988: Dean of Continuing Education, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, Connecticut 1983-1985: Director, University Without Walls Program, Loretto Heights College, Denver, Colorado 1981-1983: Associate Director, National Institute of Mental Health Federal Grant Project, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 1980-1983: Staff Member, Center for the Study of Higher Education, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 1980-1981: Program Assistant, Institute for Academic Improvement, Center for the Study of Higher Education, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 1979-1980: Assistant Executive Dean, World University-Miami, Miami, Florida 1977-1979: Assistant
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the USS Florida Letter
    Guide to the William F. Keeler Letter, 1863 February MS0457 The Mariners' Museum Library At Christopher Newport University Contact Information: The Mariners' Museum Library 100 Museum Drive Newport News, VA 23606 Phone: (757) 591-7782 Fax: (757) 591-7310 Email: [email protected] URL: www.MarinersMuseum.org/library Processed by Bill Edwards-Bodmer, March 2010 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Repository: The Mariners' Museum Library Title: William F. Keeler Letter Inclusive Dates: 1863 February Catalog number: MS0457 Physical Characteristics: 1 letter Language: English Creator: Keeler, William Frederick, 1821-1886 SCOPE AND CONTENT This collection consists of a single letter written by William F. Keeler on February 13, 1863 to David Ellis informing the latter that he had been appointed the Paymaster’s Steward on USS Florida. This letter is significant in that it contains the names and/or signatures of four former crewmen and officers of the US Steam Battery Monitor: John P. Bankhead, David R. Ellis, Samuel Dana Greene, and William F. Keeler. Greene noted on the letter the date that Ellis reported for duty and signed off; Bankhead simply wrote “Approved” and signed. Bankhead, who was captain of Monitor when it sank on December 31, 1862, was given command of Florida sometime in the winter of 1862/63 while that vessel was in New York for repairs. Bankhead requested that Greene and Keeler be assigned as his executive officer and paymaster, respectively, aboard the Florida, positions which both had held on Monitor. Keeler, in turn, requested that Ellis be assigned his steward, the same position that Ellis also had held on Monitor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of the Navy's New Frigate
    OCTOBER 2020 The Cost of the Navy’s New Frigate On April 30, 2020, the Navy awarded Fincantieri Several factors support the Navy’s estimate: Marinette Marine a contract to build the Navy’s new sur- face combatant, a guided missile frigate long designated • The FFG(X) is based on a design that has been in as FFG(X).1 The contract guarantees that Fincantieri will production for many years. build the lead ship (the first ship designed for a class) and gives the Navy options to build as many as nine addi- • Little if any new technology is being developed for it. tional ships. In this report, the Congressional Budget Office examines the potential costs if the Navy exercises • The contractor is an experienced builder of small all of those options. surface combatants. • CBO estimates the cost of the 10 FFG(X) ships • An independent estimate within the Department of would be $12.3 billion in 2020 (inflation-adjusted) Defense (DoD) was lower than the Navy’s estimate. dollars, about $1.2 billion per ship, on the basis of its own weight-based cost model. That amount is Other factors suggest the Navy’s estimate is too low: 40 percent more than the Navy’s estimate. • The costs of all surface combatants since 1970, as • The Navy estimates that the 10 ships would measured per thousand tons, were higher. cost $8.7 billion in 2020 dollars, an average of $870 million per ship. • Historically the Navy has almost always underestimated the cost of the lead ship, and a more • If the Navy’s estimate turns out to be accurate, expensive lead ship generally results in higher costs the FFG(X) would be the least expensive surface for the follow-on ships.
    [Show full text]
  • EB News May 2003
    MAY 2003 First Group Model is presented to Jimmy Carter Completes Degree In Ship Systems Technology Castine, Maine ith pomp and circum- stance, 18 MDA-UAW Wmembers marked a significant achievement in their lives as they accepted associate's degrees in ship systems design technology from Maine Maritime Academy (MMA). The 18 men and women are the first graduates of Electric Boat’s associate’s degree program, which began in 1999. Under this program, graduates of EB’s five-year design continued on page 8 Patternmaker David Keith (300), INSIDE who built the Jimmy Carter The President’s Corner • 2 (SSN-23) model for the former John Holmander Receives GD president, said it was an honor to Technical Excellence Award • 3 do so. “It was good being able to Earned Hours • 3 make something for his museum,” Keith said. “It’s something people The EB Dive Team – will see forever.” Jacks Of All Trades • 4 Employees Put Automated Milling Above, former President Jimmy Carter admires a Machine To New Uses • 5 scale model of the USS Jimmy Carter (SSN-23) at U.S. Navy Awards General the presentation of the model to the Jimmy Carter Dynamics $24M Contract • 6 Library and Museum in Atlanta on May 15. EBMA Awards $14,500 In College Presenting the model to Carter was Mike Toner, Scholarships • 7 above right, executive vice president of General Lend A Hand At United Way’s Day Dynamics and the president of Electric Boat. Of Caring • 9 Describing the model to Carter is Pete Halvordson, Retirees • 9 Seawolf Class program manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Two US Navy's Submarines
    Now available to the public by subscription. See Page 63 Volume 2018 2nd Quarter American $6.00 Submariner Special Election Issue USS Thresher (SSN-593) America’s two nuclear boats on Eternal Patrol USS Scorpion (SSN-589) More information on page 20 Download your American Submariner Electronically - Same great magazine, available earlier. Send an E-mail to [email protected] requesting the change. ISBN List 978-0-9896015-0-4 American Submariner Page 2 - American Submariner Volume 2018 - Issue 2 Page 3 Table of Contents Page Number Article 3 Table of Contents, Deadlines for Submission 4 USSVI National Officers 6 Selected USSVI . Contacts and Committees AMERICAN 6 Veterans Affairs Service Officer 6 Message from the Chaplain SUBMARINER 7 District and Base News This Official Magazine of the United 7 (change of pace) John and Jim States Submarine Veterans Inc. is 8 USSVI Regions and Districts published quarterly by USSVI. 9 Why is a Ship Called a She? United States Submarine Veterans Inc. 9 Then and Now is a non-profit 501 (C) (19) corporation 10 More Base News in the State of Connecticut. 11 Does Anybody Know . 11 “How I See It” Message from the Editor National Editor 12 2017 Awards Selections Chuck Emmett 13 “A Guardian Angel with Dolphins” 7011 W. Risner Rd. 14 Letters to the Editor Glendale, AZ 85308 18 Shipmate Honored Posthumously . (623) 455-8999 20 Scorpion and Thresher - (Our “Nuclears” on EP) [email protected] 22 Change of Command Assistant Editor 23 . Our Brother 24 A Boat Sailor . 100-Year Life Bob Farris (315) 529-9756 26 Election 2018: Bios [email protected] 41 2018 OFFICIAL BALLOT 43 …Presence of a Higher Power Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Nuclear Power 1939 – 2018 Part 1 Introduction
    Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 1: Introduction Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 1: Introduction. The other parts are: Part 2A: United States - Submarines Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 4: Europe & Canada Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2005 HNSA Anchor Watch.Qxd
    JULY ANCHOR AUGUST SEPTEMBER WATCH 2005 The Official Journal of the Historic Naval Ships Association www.hnsa.org H.N.S.A. MEMBER IN THE SPOTLIGHT THE IMPERIAL WAR MUSEUM’S H.M.S. BELFAST H.M.S. BELFAST DELIVERS A DEADLY CARGO OF FOUR-INCH SHELLS off the Normandy Coast in support of the D-Day Landings, 6 June 1944. The famed Royal Navy cruiser, also a veteran of the Korean War, is today painstakingly preserved in the River Thames at London. Please see page four for more about H.M.S. BELFAST, this month’s H.N.S.A. Member in the Spotlight. Photo courtesy H.M.S. BELFAST. ANCHOR WATCH 2 H.N.S.A. STAFF H.N.S.A. OFFICERS Executive Director CDR Jeffrey S. Nilsson, U.S.N.R. (Ret.) Executive Director Emeritus President CAPT Channing M. Zucker, U.S.N. (Ret.) James B. Sergeant, U.S.S. ALBACORE Executive Secretary Vice President James W. Cheevers William N.Tunnell, Jr., U.S.S. ALABAMA Individual Member Program Manager Secretary CDR Jeffrey S. Nilsson, U.S.N.R. (Ret.) LCDR Sherry Richardson, H.M.C.S. SACKVILLE Anchor Watch Editors Treasurer D. Douglas Buchanan, Jr. James B. Sergeant, U.S.S. ALBACORE Scott D. Kodger Immediate Past President Webmaster David R. Scheu, Sr., U.S.S. NORTH CAROLINA Richard S. Pekelney European Coordinator HONORARY DIRECTORS CAPT Cornelis D. José, R.N.L.N. (Ret.) Vice-Admiral Ron D. Buck, C.F. Chief of the Maritime Staff Dr. Christina Cameron Director General National Historic Sites Admiral Vern E.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Ships' Technical Manual, Chapter 583, Boats and Small Craft
    S9086-TX-STM-010/CH-583R3 REVISION THIRD NAVAL SHIPS’ TECHNICAL MANUAL CHAPTER 583 BOATS AND SMALL CRAFT THIS CHAPTER SUPERSEDES CHAPTER 583 DATED 1 DECEMBER 1992 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE, DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. PUBLISHED BY DIRECTION OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND. 24 MAR 1998 TITLE-1 @@FIpgtype@@TITLE@@!FIpgtype@@ S9086-TX-STM-010/CH-583R3 Certification Sheet TITLE-2 S9086-TX-STM-010/CH-583R3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter/Paragraph Page 583 BOATS AND SMALL CRAFT ............................. 583-1 SECTION 1. ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES ............................ 583-1 583-1.1 BOATS AND SMALL CRAFT .............................. 583-1 583-1.1.1 DEFINITION OF A NAVY BOAT. ....................... 583-1 583-1.2 CORRESPONDENCE ................................... 583-1 583-1.2.1 BOAT CORRESPONDENCE. .......................... 583-1 583-1.3 STANDARD ALLOWANCE OF BOATS ........................ 583-1 583-1.3.1 CNO AND PEO CLA (PMS 325) ESTABLISHED BOAT LIST. ....... 583-1 583-1.3.2 CHANGES IN BOAT ALLOWANCE. ..................... 583-1 583-1.3.3 BOATS ASSIGNED TO FLAGS AND COMMANDS. ............ 583-1 583-1.3.4 HOW BOATS ARE OBTAINED. ........................ 583-1 583-1.3.5 EMERGENCY ISSUES. ............................. 583-2 583-1.4 TRANSFER OF BOATS ................................. 583-2 583-1.4.1 PEO CLA (PMS 325) AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF BOATS. .... 583-2 583-1.4.2 TRANSFERRED WITH A FLAG. ....................... 583-2 583-1.4.3 TRANSFERS TO SPECIAL PROJECTS AND TEMPORARY LOANS. 583-2 583-1.4.3.1 Project Funded by Other Activities. ................ 583-5 583-1.4.3.2 Cost Estimates. ............................ 583-5 583-1.4.3.3 Funding Identification.
    [Show full text]