2012: Paradigm Shifts in Science: Insights from the Arts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2012: Paradigm Shifts in Science: Insights from the Arts FOREWORD Paradigm shifts in science: insights from the arts Joseph L Goldstein This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of sider the Higgs particle, which high-energy ative Paul Krugman op-ed piece in The New the publication of a highly influential book, physicists believe to be fundamental for the York Times entitled “The Ponzi Paradigm.” The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by the existence of all matter. On the one hand, in the One of the most surprising anomalies in physicist and historian Thomas Kuhn1. This Kuhnian sense, finding the Higgs particle is relation to Kuhn is the lack of any mention is the book that introduced the world to the normal science operating in the context of the in Structure of the two greatest paradigm principles of “paradigms” and “paradigm existing paradigm of the standard model of shifts in the biological sciences—Darwinism shifts.” Ironically, it is also the book in which particle physics. On the other hand, not find- and Mendelism. The most likely explanation the author underwent his own paradigm shift ing the authentic Higgs particle would be a is that Kuhn was totally focused on physics, by debunking the prevailing theory of how paradigm-shifting anomaly, pointing to a new which in the 1950s and 1960s was top scien- scientific progress comes about. physics beyond the standard model. tific dog. Prior to Kuhn’s 1962 book, historians and Speaking of anomalies, there are several It is ironic that the year in which Structure philosophers of science considered the scien- that surround Thomas Kuhn. How did a appeared was the same year in which the tific enterprise to be a rational endeavor in scientist who was passed over for tenure at first molecular structures of DNA and pro- which progress and knowledge are achieved Harvard write one of the great books of the tein were awarded Nobel Prizes—one in through the steady, day-to-day, painstaking last 50 years—a book that has become a cul- Physiology or Medicine to James Watson and accumulation of experimental data, accred- tural icon like 1984 and The Double Helix? Francis Crick and the other in Chemistry to ited facts and new discoveries. Kuhn referred Since its publication in 1962, The Structure Max Perutz and John Kendrew. If ever a sci- to this traditional approach as “normal sci- of Scientific Revolutions has sold 1.5 million ence was on the verge of a paradigm shift, it ence,” and he used the then-obscure word copies in 16 languages, is still required reading was molecular biology in 1962. The genetic paradigm to refer to the shared ideas and in courses in the history and philosophy of code had just been cracked, and recombinant concepts that guide the members of a given science and is cited more often than the clas- DNA and gene cloning were just around the scientific field. sic works of Sigmund Freud, Noam Chomsky corner. To paraphrase Virginia Woolf, on or Kuhn’s great insight was to realize that real and James Watson. Its success is even more about December 10, 1962, the world of sci- progress did not result from the puzzle-solving surprising when one takes a look at its first ence changed. of normal science. Instead, he argued that review published in Scientific American in What about paradigm shifts in the arts? true breakthroughs arise in a totally different 1962. The last sentence reads: “The book Kuhn believed that great works of art retain way—when the discovery of anomalies leads succeeds in presenting sound but familiar their value throughout time even in the face scientists to question the paradigm, and this reflections on the nature of science; it is also of new revolutionary movements. To quote in turn leads to a scientific revolution that much ado about very little.” So much for bad Kuhn, “Picasso’s success has not relegated he termed paradigm shift. Kuhn based his reviews! Rembrandt’s paintings to the storage vaults of model on the classic paradigm shifts in phys- The most obvious reason for Structure’s art museums.”2 So what should we call Pablo ics, including the Copernican, Newtonian and astonishing success is the thought-provoking Picasso’s and Georges Braque’s transition from Einsteinian revolutions, the development of way in which Kuhn framed his thesis, adorn- impressionism to cubism or Jackson Pollock’s quantum mechanics, which replaced classi- ing it with the two unfamiliar but sexy catch- and Willem de Kooning’s transition from real- cal mechanics at the subatomic level, and the words. In the last ten years, paradigm and ism to abstract expressionism? If they are not accidental discovery of X-rays by Roentgen, paradigm shift have pervaded virtually every paradigm shifts, given the cutthroat competi- one of the great unanticipated anomalies in aspect of our culture. Today, you can purchase tive nature of the art world, what about para- the history of science. audio and video equipment from Paradigm digm rifts? Or paradigm tiffs? In one sense, Kuhn viewed normal science Electronics in Ontario, Canada; you can buy as a mopping-up operation. Yet he did rec- bonds and stocks from Paradigm Financial James Rosenquist and instantly forming ognize the essential importance of normal Partners in the UK; you can obtain solu- ideas science, appreciating that most discoveries tions to your human resource problems from Although Kuhn’s paradigm model may not occur during periods of normal science. To Paradigm Shift Consulting Service, Ltd. in be strictly relevant to the arts, artists have illustrate with a contemporary example, con- India; or—best of all—you can read a provoc- nonetheless shed light on a key question that NATURE MEDICINE VOLUME 18 | NUMBER 10 | OCTOBER 2012 iii FOREWORD was never answered by Kuhn: Where do the abc daring ideas in science that bring on para- digm shifts come from? Some ideas, accord- ing to the American artist James Rosenquist, arise explosively in a light-bulb moment in the middle of the night. Rosenquist is one of America’s most creative contemporary art- ists. Together with Andy Warhol and Roy Lichtenstein, he was one of the three found- ing members of the Pop Art movement in the 1960s. One of his signature paintings of 1960, entitled President-Elect, shows a charismatic President John F. Kennedy juxtaposed with a Figure 1 Instantly forming ideas. (a) James Rosenquist, Idea—Middle of the Night, 2007. Light bulb, woman’s hand holding a piece of devil’s food pencil and electric wiring on painted wood. 7.5 × 12 × 12 inches. (b) James Rosenquist, Idea, 2:50 cake and with a 1960 Pontiac. The devil’s a.m., 2007. Oil on canvas. 57 × 44 inches. (c) James Rosenquist, Idea, 3:50 a.m., 2007. Oil on food cake is a stand-in for a tempting female, canvas. 63 × 49 inches. Exhibited at Acquavella Gallery, New York, New York. and the car is astonishingly prophetic, fore- shadowing by three years Kennedy’s ill-fated matic way. Penone’s most recent installation hearts were placed in separate salt solutions. motorcade death. was commissioned as the centerpiece for this When Loewi stimulated the vagus nerve of Now that Rosenquist is approaching year’s Documenta exhibition of contempo- the first heart, it beat slower. Then, when he 80 years of age, his artistic interests have rary art, which takes place every five years in took the fluid from this stimulated heart and shifted from visualizing popular culture to Kassel, Germany4. added it to the second heart that had no vagus visualizing the philosophy of ideas. According Penone’s piece, entitled Idee di pietra (Ideas nerve, the second heart beat slower, proving to Rosenquist, “A good idea that spurs you on of Stone), consists of a bronze structure of a that a soluble chemical, which turned out to to do something should have pictorial power. large nut tree (30 feet tall) with a stone lodged be acetylcholine, was released from the vagus After all, what does a great idea look like?” high in its branches (Fig. 2). The stone is a nerve and controlled the heart rate. So, in 2007, Rosenquist created a series of type of granite rock that contains billions of Did the shy and reserved Otto Loewi tell sculptures and paintings that deal with the crystals of silicate minerals that were formed his tale as it really happened? One expects tall origin of ideas3. Figure 1a shows a sculpture over many years by the natural processes of tales from certain Texas Nobel laureates, but entitled Idea—Middle of the Night. The pen- weathering and erosion. Penone purposely not from a taciturn German one. As you will cils that pierce the light bulb articulate the selected a stone that has the shape of a human read in the essays of this year’s Lasker win- hands of a clock. The pencils also have to do brain, thus producing a brain of billions of ners, the daring ideas that led to their awards with writing down an idea that pops into your silicate crystals, each crystal possessing a pre- were formed in a complex way that combines head in the wee hours of the night. Figure cise geometry that symbolizes order and logic the slow-hunches of Penone with the instant 1b shows a painting entitled Idea, 2:50 a.m. like great thoughts produced by neurons in light-bulb moments of Rosenquist. The bulb is the light that goes off suddenly in the brain. So in this sense, Penone’s structure your mind in the middle of the night like an is telling us that the big idea forms like the Basic Award: a set of daring intellectual alarm clock.
Recommended publications
  • Front Matter (PDF)
    IMMUNOLOGYwww.jimmunol.org Volume 176 / No. 6 / March 15, 2006 OF OURNAL J THE IMMUNOLOGYProgram Issue2006 Co-sponsored by Sir Philip Cohen and Professor Dario Alessi of the MRC Protein Phosphorylation Unit, and Professor Doreen Cantrell, University of Dundee Symposium Location: Apex City Quay Hotel & Spa, Dundee, UK tel +44 (0) 1382 561600 AN INITIATIVE TO RECOGNISE & REWARD OUTSTANDING RESEARCH WITHIN THE CELL SIGNALLING AREA Submission Deadline: 31st March, 2006 The successful young scientist will receive reagents and support funding of £10,000/$17,000/€14,000 donated to their laboratory, a personal cash prize of £5,000/$8,500/€7,000, plus a trophy. IMMUNOLOGY 2006 Annual Meeting of The American Association of Immunologists May 12–16, 2006 Hynes Convention Center • Boston, MA ImportantImportant DeadlinesDeadlines EARLY REGISTRATION HOTEL RESERVATIONS VISA INFORMATION March 6, 2006 April 13, 2006 www.aai.org/Imm2006/TransVisas.htm For complete meeting information visit www.aai.org/Imm2006/default.htm AAI Program PRESIDENT’S PROGRAM President’s Symposium DISTINGUISHED LECTURES T Cell Recognition and Development President’s Address Supported through an unrestricted educa- Defining Yourself: Tolerance Development Monday, May 15, 2:30 PM tional grant from Genentech, Inc. Hynes Convention Center, Ballroom A/B in the Immune System Ronald N. Germain, NIAID, NIH Chair: Paul M. Allen, Washington Univ. Saturday, May 13, 5:00 PM Friday, May 12, 5:00 PM School of Medicine, AAI President Hynes Convention Center, Ballroom A/B Hynes Convention Center, Ballroom A/B Speakers Introduction: Emil R. Unanue A reconstructionist's view Philippa Marrack, HHMI, Washington Univ. School of Medicine of antigen-specific T cell National Jewish Med.
    [Show full text]
  • Otto Loewi (1873–1961): Dreamer and Nobel Laureate
    Singapore Med J 2014; 55(1): 3-4 M edicine in S tamps doi:10.11622/smedj.2014002 Otto Loewi (1873–1961): Dreamer and Nobel laureate Alli N McCoy1, MD, PhD, Siang Yong Tan2, MD, JD ronically, Otto Loewi is better known for the way in barely passed the end-of-year examination, requiring a year which he came upon the idea that won him the Nobel of remediation before he was able to complete his medical Prize than for the discovery itself. Loewi’s prize-winning degree in 1896. experiment came to him in a dream. According to Loewi, Loewi’s first job as an assistant in the city hospital at I“The night before Easter Sunday of [1920] I awoke, turned on the Frankfurt proved frustrating, as he could not provide effective light and jotted down a few notes on a tiny slip of thin paper. treatment for patients with tuberculosis and pneumonia. Then I fell asleep again. It occurred to me at 6.00 o’clock in Disheartened, he decided to leave clinical medicine for a the morning that during the night I had written down something basic science research position in the laboratory of prominent important, but I was unable to decipher the scrawl. The next German pharmacologist, Hans Meyer, at the University of night, at 3.00 o’clock, the idea returned. It was the design of Marburg an der Lahn. While Loewi would eventually win an experiment to determine whether or not the hypothesis of international acclaim for his contribution to neuroscience, his chemical transmission that I had uttered 17 years ago was correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 84 of the Genetics Society Newsletter
    JANUARY 2021 | ISSUE 84 GENETICS SOCIETY NEWS In this issue The Genetics Society News is edited by • Non-canonical Careers: Thinking Outside the Box of Academia and Industry Margherita Colucci and items for future • Celebrating the 35th anniversary of DNA fingerprinting issues can be sent to the editor by email • Genetics Society Summer Studentship Workshop 2020 to [email protected]. • 2020 Heredity best student-led paper prize winners The Newsletter is published twice a year, • Industrious Science: interview with Dr Paul Lavin with copy dates of July and January. Celebrating students’ achievements: 2020 Genetics Society Summer Studentship Workshop, 2020 Heredity best student-led paper prize. Page 30 A WORD FROM THE EDITOR A word from the editor Welcome to Issue 84 elcome to the latest issue of the Thinking Outside the Box of WGenetics Society Newsletter! Academia and Industry”. This little This issue is packed with great news vade mecum for careers in genetics of achievements and good science. The collects inspiring interviews led first Genetics Society virtual workshop by our very own Postgraduate for the 2020 Summer studentship saw Representative, Emily Baker. In exceptional contributions from the Emily’s words, these experiences attending students. You can read more “demonstrate how a PhD in genetics about participants’ experiences in the can be a platform for a career in just interviews with the talk’s winners in about anything. Pursuing a career the Feature section. in academia, industry, publishing or science communication could be for Many more prizes were awarded: you, but so could many others. Why Heredity journal announced the not take a career path less travelled 2020 Heredity best student-led paper by, it might make all the difference?” winners, and James Burgon’s Heredity podcast dedicated an episode to the Enjoy! first prize winner, with insights from Best wishes, Heredity Editor-in-Chief, Barbara Margherita Colucci Mable.
    [Show full text]
  • E Neurobiology of Learning and Memory – As Related in the Memoirs of Eric R
    www.surgicalneurologyint.com Surgical Neurology International Editor-in-Chief: Nancy E. Epstein, MD, Clinical Professor of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, State U. of NY at Stony Brook. SNI: Socioeconomics, Politics, and Medicine Editor James A Ausman, MD, PhD University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA Open Access Book Review e neurobiology of learning and memory – as related in the memoirs of Eric R. Kandel Miguel A. Faria Clinical Professor of Surgery (Neurosurgery, ret.) and Adjunct Professor of Medical History (ret.), Mercer University School of Medicine, United States. E-mail: *Miguel A. Faria - [email protected] Author : Eric R. Kandel Published by : W.W. Norton & Co., New York, NY, USA Price : $19.95 ISBN-13 : 978-0393329377 ISBN-10 : 9780393329377 Year : 2006 *Corresponding author: Miguel A. Faria, MD Clinical Professor of Surgery (Neurosurgery, ret.) and Adjunct Professor of Medical History (ret.), Mercer University School of Medicine, United States. [email protected] is magnificent tome by Eric R. Kandel, M.D., a psychoanalyst and neuroscience researcher, Received : 22 July 2020 is both a delightful autobiography and a scrupulously detailed history of the neurobiology of Accepted : 22 July 2020 learning and memory, a relatively new area of neuroscience that Kandel refers to as a “new [7] Published : 15 August 2020 science of mind.” His own fundamental work in this area made him a recipient of a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2000, which he shared with two other distinguished investigators, DOI Drs. Arvid Carlsson (for elucidating the effects of dopamine in Parkinson’s disease) and Paul 10.25259/SNI_458_2020 Greengard (for the discovery of signal transduction in neurons).
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Memory
    In Search of Memory (The emergence of a new science of mind) Eric R. Kandel (Book review by Carles Sierra. Published in AI Journal 2010, vol 174) This book is a passionate praise of scientific inquiry. The initial biography of the author, from a childhood in nazi-occupied Vienna to a youth of liberal education in the USA, set the character of Eric Kandel as a determined person. His family escaped, when he was 9 years old, the nazi prosecution of Jews in 1939. The book accounts for his personal biography at large put in the context of the research of his time and his contribution to neurosciences. He accounts also for the results of many other European researchers that unfortunately had to leave their countries during WWII. The book is hard to put down, Kandel masters scientific writing and gives a clear and chronological history of the fascinating discoveries of the neurosciences in the twentieth century, The book also accounts for the personal quest of the author to find the ultimate biological explanation of human behaviour, that is, how learning processes and memory are sustained by neurological mechanisms, electrical, chemical and genetic. Memory is the essence of all of us. When we lose our memory we fade away. As Kandel puts it: ‘we are who we are because of what we learn and what we remember.’ The book is organised along three different types of content. On the one hand the personal biography of the author that allows the reader to enjoy the motives, illusions and emotions of a researcher, a detailed explanation of research findings that introduce the reader to the big names in neuroscience during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and a chronological description of the research focus of Eric Kandel.
    [Show full text]
  • Federation Member Society Nobel Laureates
    FEDERATION MEMBER SOCIETY NOBEL LAUREATES For achievements in Chemistry, Physiology/Medicine, and PHysics. Award Winners announced annually in October. Awards presented on December 10th, the anniversary of Nobel’s death. (-H represents Honorary member, -R represents Retired member) # YEAR AWARD NAME AND SOCIETY DOB DECEASED 1 1904 PM Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (APS-H) 09/14/1849 02/27/1936 for work on the physiology of digestion, through which knowledge on vital aspects of the subject has been transformed and enlarged. 2 1912 PM Alexis Carrel (APS/ASIP) 06/28/1873 01/05/1944 for work on vascular suture and the transplantation of blood vessels and organs 3 1919 PM Jules Bordet (AAI-H) 06/13/1870 04/06/1961 for discoveries relating to immunity 4 1920 PM August Krogh (APS-H) 11/15/1874 09/13/1949 (Schack August Steenberger Krogh) for discovery of the capillary motor regulating mechanism 5 1922 PM A. V. Hill (APS-H) 09/26/1886 06/03/1977 Sir Archibald Vivial Hill for discovery relating to the production of heat in the muscle 6 1922 PM Otto Meyerhof (ASBMB) 04/12/1884 10/07/1951 (Otto Fritz Meyerhof) for discovery of the fixed relationship between the consumption of oxygen and the metabolism of lactic acid in the muscle 7 1923 PM Frederick Grant Banting (ASPET) 11/14/1891 02/21/1941 for the discovery of insulin 8 1923 PM John J.R. Macleod (APS) 09/08/1876 03/16/1935 (John James Richard Macleod) for the discovery of insulin 9 1926 C Theodor Svedberg (ASBMB-H) 08/30/1884 02/26/1971 for work on disperse systems 10 1930 PM Karl Landsteiner (ASIP/AAI) 06/14/1868 06/26/1943 for discovery of human blood groups 11 1931 PM Otto Heinrich Warburg (ASBMB-H) 10/08/1883 08/03/1970 for discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme 12 1932 PM Lord Edgar D.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Revista de la Facultad de Medicina ISSN: 2357-3848 ISSN: 0120-0011 Universidad Nacional de Colombia Barco-Ríos, John; Duque-Parra, Jorge Eduardo; Barco-Cano, Johanna Alexandra From substance fermentation to action potential in modern science (part two) Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, vol. 66, no. 4, 2018, October-December, pp. 623-627 Universidad Nacional de Colombia DOI: 10.15446/revfacmed.v66n4.65552 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=576364271017 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Rev. Fac. Med. 2018 Vol. 66 No. 4: 623-7 623 REFLECTION PAPER DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v66n4.65552 From substance fermentation to action potential in modern science (part two) De la fermentación de sustancias al potencial de acción en la ciencia moderna (segunda parte) Received: 08/06/2017. Accepted: 12/12/2017. John Barco-Ríos1,2 • Jorge Eduardo Duque-Parra1,2 • Johanna Alexandra Barco-Cano2,3 1 Universidad de Caldas - Faculty of Health Sciences - Department of Basic Sciences - Manizales - Colombia. 2 Universidad de Caldas - Department of Basic Sciences - Caldas Neuroscience Group - Manizales - Colombia. 3 Universidad de Caldas - Faculty of Health Sciences - Clinical Department - Manizales - Colombia. Corresponding author: John Barco-Ríos. Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Caldas. Calle 65 No. 26-10, office: M203. Telephone number: +57 6 8781500. Manizales. Colombia. Email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Molecular Machinery of Neurotransmitter Release Nobel Lecture, 7 December 2013
    The Molecular Machinery of Neurotransmitter Release Nobel Lecture, 7 December 2013 by Thomas C. Südhof Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, USA. 1. THE NEUROTRANSMITTER RELEASE ENIGMA Synapses have a long history in science. Synapses were frst functionally demon- strated by Emil duBois-Reymond (1818–1896), were morphologically identifed by classical neuroanatomists such as Rudolf von Kölliker (1817–1905) and San- tiago Ramon y Cajal (1852–1934), and named in 1897 by Michael Foster (1836– 1907). Although the chemical nature of synaptic transmission was already sug- gested by duBois-Reymond, it was long disputed because of its incredible speed. Over time, however, overwhelming evidence established that most synapses use chemical messengers called neurotransmitters, most notably with the pioneer- ing contributions by Otto Loewi (1873–1961), Henry Dale (1875–1968), Ulf von Euler (1905–1983), and Julius Axelrod (1912–2004). In parallel, arguably the most important advance to understanding how synapses work was provided by Bernard Katz (1911–2003), who elucidated the principal mechanism of syn- aptic transmission (Katz, 1969). Most initial studies on synapses were carried out on the neuromuscular junction, and central synapses have only come to the fore in recent decades. Here, major contributions by many scientists, including George Palade, Rodolfo Llinas, Chuck Stevens, Bert Sakmann, Eric Kandel, and Victor Whittaker, to name just a few, not only confrmed the principal results obtained in the neuromuscular junction by Katz, but also revealed that synapses 259 6490_Book.indb 259 11/4/14 2:29 PM 260 The Nobel Prizes exhibit an enormous diversity of properties as well as an unexpected capacity for plasticity.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 40 Years of Rita Allen Foundation Scholars 1 PEOPLE Rita Allen Foundation Scholars: 1976–2016
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ORIGINS From the President . 4 Exploration and Discovery: 40 Years of the Rita Allen Foundation Scholars Program . .5 Unexpected Connections: A Conversation with Arnold Levine . .6 SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE Pioneering Pain Researcher Invests in Next Generation of Scholars: A Conversation with Kathleen Foley (1978) . .10 Douglas Fearon: Attacking Disease with Insights . .12 Jeffrey Macklis (1991): Making and Mending the Brain’s Machinery . .15 Gregory Hannon (2000): Tools for Tough Questions . .18 Joan Steitz, Carl Nathan (1984) and Charles Gilbert (1986) . 21 KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Robert Weinberg (1976): The Genesis of Cancer Genetics . .26 Thomas Jessell (1984): Linking Molecules to Perception and Motion . 29 Titia de Lange (1995): The Complex Puzzle of Chromosome Ends . .32 Andrew Fire (1989): The Resonance of Gene Silencing . 35 Yigong Shi (1999): Illuminating the Cell’s Critical Systems . .37 SCHOLAR PROFILES Tom Maniatis (1978): Mastering Methods and Exploring Molecular Mechanisms . 40 Bruce Stillman (1983): The Foundations of DNA Replication . .43 Luis Villarreal (1983): A Life in Viruses . .46 Gilbert Chu (1988): DNA Dreamer . .49 Jon Levine (1988): A Passion for Deciphering Pain . 52 Susan Dymecki (1999): Serotonin Circuit Master . 55 Hao Wu (2002): The Cellular Dimensions of Immunity . .58 Ajay Chawla (2003): Beyond Immunity . 61 Christopher Lima (2003): Structure Meets Function . 64 Laura Johnston (2004): How Life Shapes Up . .67 Senthil Muthuswamy (2004): Tackling Cancer in Three Dimensions . .70 David Sabatini (2004): Fueling Cell Growth . .73 David Tuveson (2004): Decoding a Cryptic Cancer . 76 Hilary Coller (2005): When Cells Sleep . .79 Diana Bautista (2010): An Itch for Knowledge . .82 David Prober (2010): Sleeping Like the Fishes .
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates in Physiology Or Medicine
    All Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine 1901 Emil A. von Behring Germany ”for his work on serum therapy, especially its application against diphtheria, by which he has opened a new road in the domain of medical science and thereby placed in the hands of the physician a victorious weapon against illness and deaths” 1902 Sir Ronald Ross Great Britain ”for his work on malaria, by which he has shown how it enters the organism and thereby has laid the foundation for successful research on this disease and methods of combating it” 1903 Niels R. Finsen Denmark ”in recognition of his contribution to the treatment of diseases, especially lupus vulgaris, with concentrated light radiation, whereby he has opened a new avenue for medical science” 1904 Ivan P. Pavlov Russia ”in recognition of his work on the physiology of digestion, through which knowledge on vital aspects of the subject has been transformed and enlarged” 1905 Robert Koch Germany ”for his investigations and discoveries in relation to tuberculosis” 1906 Camillo Golgi Italy "in recognition of their work on the structure of the nervous system" Santiago Ramon y Cajal Spain 1907 Charles L. A. Laveran France "in recognition of his work on the role played by protozoa in causing diseases" 1908 Paul Ehrlich Germany "in recognition of their work on immunity" Elie Metchniko France 1909 Emil Theodor Kocher Switzerland "for his work on the physiology, pathology and surgery of the thyroid gland" 1910 Albrecht Kossel Germany "in recognition of the contributions to our knowledge of cell chemistry made through his work on proteins, including the nucleic substances" 1911 Allvar Gullstrand Sweden "for his work on the dioptrics of the eye" 1912 Alexis Carrel France "in recognition of his work on vascular suture and the transplantation of blood vessels and organs" 1913 Charles R.
    [Show full text]
  • Acceleron Founder Dr. Tom Maniatis to Receive the 2012 Lasker Award in Medical Science
    September 12, 2012 Acceleron Founder Dr. Tom Maniatis To Receive The 2012 Lasker Award in Medical Science Cambridge, Mass. – September 12, 2012 – Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company developing protein therapeutics for cancer and orphan diseases, announced that Tom Maniatis, Ph.D., an Acceleron co-founder and Professor and Chair of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics at the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, is to be honored with the 2012 Lasker-Koshland Special Achievement Award in Medical Science. The Albert and Mary Lasker foundation award is considered to be one of the most prestigious scientific prizes and the Special Achievement Award recognizes its recipients for exceptional leadership and citizenship in biomedical science. Dr. Maniatis will be presented with the Lasker-Koshland Special Achievement Award in Medical Science on September 21st in New York City. Dr. Maniatis is a pioneer in the development of gene cloning technology, and he has published extensively in the field of eukaryotic gene regulation. In particular, he identified numerous genetic defects that underlie the inherited human illness β- thalassemia. Dr. Maniatis is widely known for his seminal work developing gene cloning technologies and applying those methods to discovering the genetic bases of human diseases. His book, “The Cloning Manual,”has become a world-wide resource. In addition to these scientific accomplishments, Dr. Maniatis has been instrumental in creating successful biotechnology companies. He was a co-founder of Genetics Institute, where he chaired the scientific board and served on the board of directors for more than 17 years. During this time, Genetic Institute’s gained FDA approval for several protein-based drugs, including recombinant human erythropoietin, Factor VIII and Factor IX, as well as bone morphogenic proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neuro Nobels
    NEURO NOBELS Richard J. Barohn, MD Gertrude and Dewey Ziegler Professor of Neurology University Distinguished Professor Vice Chancellor for Research President Research Institute Research & Discovery Director, Frontiers: The University of Kansas Clinical and Translational Science Grand Rounds Institute February 14, 2018 1 Alfred Nobel 1833-1896 • Born Stockholm, Sweden • Father involved in machine tools and explosives • Family moved to St. Petersburg when Alfred was young • Father worked on armaments for Russians in the Crimean War… successful business/ naval mines (Also steam engines and eventually oil).. made and lost fortunes • Alfred and brothers educated by private teachers; never attended university or got a degree • Sent to Sweden, Germany, France and USA to study chemical engineering • In Paris met the inventor of nitroglycerin Ascanio Sobrero • 1863- Moved back to Stockholm and worked on nitro but too dangerous.. brother killed in an explosion • To make it safer to use he experimented with different additives and mixed nitro with kieselguhr, turning liquid into paste which could be shaped into rods that could be inserted into drilling holes • 1867- Patented this under name of DYNAMITE • Also invented the blasting cap detonator • These inventions and advances in drilling changed construction • 1875-Invented gelignite, more stable than dynamite and in 1887, ballistics, predecessor of cordite • Overall had over 350 patents 2 Alfred Nobel 1833-1896 The Merchant of Death • Traveled much of his business life, companies throughout Europe and America • Called " Europe's Richest Vagabond" • Solitary man / depressive / never married but had several love relationships • No children • This prompted him to rethink how he would be • Wrote poetry in English, was considered remembered scandalous/blasphemous.
    [Show full text]