DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Opinion Issued by U.S. Fish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Opinion Issued by U.S. Fish BIOLOGICAL OPINION For the Alaska Federal/State Preparedness Plan for Response to Oil & Hazardous Substance Discharges/Releases Consultation with U.S. Coast Guard and Environmental Protection Agency Prepared by: Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Field Office U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4700 BLM Rd Anchorage, AK 99507 February 27, 2015 Cover Photo. Spectacled eiders (Somateria fischeri) Unified Plan Biological Opinion iv Table of Contents Acronyms & Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.1 Species Not Further Considered in this Opinion ............................................................................................... 11 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION ........................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Mechanical Countermeasures ........................................................................................................................... 13 Deflection and Containment .............................................................................................................................. 13 2.2 Non-mechanical Countermeasures and Monitoring .......................................................................................... 19 Application of Approved Chemical Dispersants by Vessels or Aircraft ............................................................ 19 In Situ Burning ................................................................................................................................................... 23 Other Non-mechanical Countermeasures and Monitoring ................................................................................. 24 2.3 Tracking and Surveillance ................................................................................................................................ 25 Use of Aircraft, Vessels, All-terrain Vehicles, or Heavy Machinery ................................................................. 25 Installation of Buoys .......................................................................................................................................... 25 Sample Collection .............................................................................................................................................. 26 2.4 Waste Management ........................................................................................................................................... 26 Waste Handling and Storage .............................................................................................................................. 26 Waste Transport ................................................................................................................................................. 26 Waste Treatment and/or Disposal ...................................................................................................................... 27 Decontamination ................................................................................................................................................ 27 2.5 Wildlife Protection/Mitigation Measures .......................................................................................................... 27 Recovery of Contaminated Carcasses to Prevent Contamination of Other Wildlife .......................................... 27 Deterrence .......................................................................................................................................................... 28 Pre-emptive Capture and Relocation of Uncontaminated Wildlife & ................................................................ 28 Capture, Treatment, and Release of Contaminated Wildlife .............................................................................. 28 Strategic Avoidance ........................................................................................................................................... 28 2.6 Decision-Making Processes .............................................................................................................................. 28 Response Planning ............................................................................................................................................. 29 During an Incident ............................................................................................................................................. 30 2.7 Interrelated and Interdependent Actions ........................................................................................................... 34 2.8 Assumptions...................................................................................................................................................... 34 2.9 Action Area and Life of the Project .................................................................................................................. 35 3.0 STATUS OF THE SPECIES ................................................................................................................................. 36 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE ........................................................................................................................ 36 4.1 Sea otter ............................................................................................................................................................ 36 Status in the Action Area ................................................................................................................................... 36 Critical Habitat Designation and Use ................................................................................................................. 37 Threats and Possible Stressors in the Action Area ............................................................................................. 38 Recovery ............................................................................................................................................................ 40 4.2 Short-Tailed Albatross ...................................................................................................................................... 41 Status in the Action Area ................................................................................................................................... 41 Threats and Possible Stressors in the Action Area ............................................................................................. 41 Recovery ............................................................................................................................................................ 43 4.3 Polar Bear ......................................................................................................................................................... 43 Status in the Action Area ................................................................................................................................... 43 Threats and Possible Stressors in the Action Area ............................................................................................. 45 Recovery ............................................................................................................................................................ 49 4.4 Walrus ............................................................................................................................................................... 50 Status in the Action Area ................................................................................................................................... 50 Threats and Possible Stressors in the Action Area ............................................................................................. 50 Recovery ............................................................................................................................................................ 55 4.5 Spectacled Eider ............................................................................................................................................... 55 Status in the Action Area ................................................................................................................................... 55 Critical Habitat Designation and Use ................................................................................................................. 57 Unified Plan Biological Opinion v Threats and Possible Stressors in the Action Area ............................................................................................. 57 Recovery ............................................................................................................................................................ 61 4.6 Steller’s Eider ................................................................................................................................................... 61 Status in the Action Area ................................................................................................................................... 61 Critical Habitat Use and Designation ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oversight and Reauthorization Hearing on the Rehabilitation Act of 1983
    DOCUMEIIT RESUME ED 249 748 EC 170 860 TITLE Ove- ght and Reauthorization Hearing on the Rehabilitation Act of 1983. Bearings before the Subcot 'Nitta. on Select Education of the Committee on Education and Labor. Rouse of Representatives, Ninety -- Eighth Congress, First Session Narch 21 and 23, 1983). INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C.Rouse Commettee on Education and Labor. PUB DATE 84; NOTE ' FUR TYPE 4114*I 1/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE NFO1 /FC18 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Compliance (Legal); Disabilities; *Federal Legislation; Federal Programs; Bearings; Rehabilitation; *Vocational Rehabilitation 'IDENTIFIERS *Rehabilitation Act 1973 ABSTRACT Excerpts are presented from the March 1983 hearings on oversight and reauthorization of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Prepared statements are included from federal officials; representatives of professional rehabilitation and education associations and state and local agencies; etudents; and other interested persons. In addition to the statements, letters and supplemental materials on the topic are also, provided from associations, agencies, university faculty, and federal officials. The statements touch on amendisents to the act, provisions for independent living, rehabilitation research, and rehabilitation training. (CL) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRA are the best that can be made from the original document. ***********************************************************************
    [Show full text]
  • Spectacled Eiders He Spectacled Eider Is Truly a Breed Apart
    WILDLIFE AND GLOBAL WARMING Navigating the Arctic Meltdown © GARY KRAMER/GARY KRAMER.NET SPECTACLED EIDERS he spectacled eider is truly a breed apart. A diving duck named for its distinctively T“spectacled” appearance, the eider spends much of the year in places so remote that its wintering grounds were only discovered in 1999, with the help of space-age satellite tracking. With its American population decimated by poisoning from ingesting lead shot, the eider was listed as a threatened species in 1993. Now global warming poses an additional peril to this unique bird, with the potential to alter both the eiders’ breeding and wintering habitats. A Rare Bird Pacific; more nutrients are flushed into the shallow seas by The spectacled eider is a medium-sized sea duck, slightly Alaska’s great river systems. These nutrients nourish algae smaller than a mallard, but with a stockier appearance. and microscopic plants called phytoplankton, which grow Males have a white back, a black breast and belly, a thick in huge numbers in the shallow waters. Algae are then orange bill and a green head, offset by large white eye eaten by tiny animals called zooplankton, which in turn patches bordered in black—the characteristic “spectacles” serve as food for larger animals. Particles of food, dead that give the bird its name. The female is a drab, speckled algae and nutrients “rain” down onto the sea floor, feeding brown, with less distinct tan spectacles. a huge array of clams, crustaceans and marine worms Each winter, the world’s entire population of spectacled throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Northstar Project Final Environmental
    BEAUFORT SEA OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT/ NORTHSTAR PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Volume I: Cover Sheet Executive Summary Volume II: Chapter 1.0 Introduction Chapter 2.0 Traditional Knowledge Chapter 3.0 Oil and Gas Development/Production Options for the Alaskan Beaufort Sea Chapter 4.0 Northstar Unit Development/Production Alternatives Volume III: Chapter 5.0 Affected Physical Environment and Impacts Chapter 6.0 Affected Biological Environment and Impacts Chapter 7.0 Affected Human Environment and Impacts Volume IV: Chapter 8.0 Effects of Oil on the Physical, Biological, and Human Environments Chapter 9.0 Effects of Noise on the Biological and Human Environments Chapter 10.0 Cumulative Effects Chapter 11.0 Comparison of Project Alternatives and Their Impacts Chapter 12.0 List of Preparers Chapter 13.0 Consultation and Coordination Glossary Index Appendix A: Appendix A Final Project Description Appendices B Through K: Appendix B Biological Assessment Appendix C Updated Mailing List Appendix D Northstar Unit Lease Stipulation Summaries and Applicable Alaska Regulations Appendix E Technical Appendices Appendix F Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Appendix G National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Fact Sheet Appendix H Ocean Discharge Criteria Evaluation Appendix I Section 103 Evaluation Appendix J Draft Underground Injection Control Permit Appendix K Public Comments Received on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Appendix K (Continued) Through P Appendix K Public Comments Received on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Appendix L Response to Public Comments Appendix M Biological Opinions Appendix N Final Underground Injection Control Permit Appendix O Preliminary Final National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Appendix P Reports of the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BSOGD/NP EIS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AAC Alaska Administrative Code ACMP Alaska Coastal Management Program ACS Alaska Clean Seas A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Duck Curriculum Revised
    Sea Ducks of Alaska Activity Guide Acknowledgments Contact Information: Project Coordinator: Marilyn Sigman, Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies Education: Written By: Sea Duck Activity Guide, Teaching Kit and Display: Elizabeth Trowbridge, Center for Alaskan Coastal Marilyn Sigman Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies Studies P.O. Box 2225 Homer, AK 99603 Illustrations by: (907) 235-6667 Bill Kitzmiller, Conrad Field and Fineline Graphics [email protected] (Alaska Wildlife Curriculum Illustrations), Elizabeth Alaska Wildlife Curricula Trowbridge Robin Dublin Wildlife Education Coordinator Reviewers: Alaska Dept. of Fish & Game Marilyn Sigman, Bree Murphy, Lisa Ellington, Tim Division of Wildlife Conservation Bowman, Tom Rothe 333 Raspberry Rd. Anchorage, AK 99518-1599 (907)267-2168 Funded By: [email protected] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Coastal Program and Scientific/technical Information: The Alaska Department of Fish and Game, State Duck Tim Bowman Stamp Program Sea Duck Joint Venture Coordinator (Pacific) The Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies would like to thank U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service the following people for their time and commitment to sea 1011 E. Tudor Rd. duck education: Tim Bowman, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Anchorage, AK 99503 Service, Sea Duck Joint Venture Project, for providing (907) 786-3569 background technical information, photographs and [email protected] support for this activity guide and the sea duck traveling SEADUCKJV.ORG display; Tom Rothe and Dan Rosenberg of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game for technical information, Tom Rothe presentations and photographs for both the sea duck Waterfowl Coordinator traveling display and the activity guide species identifica- Alaska Dept. of Fish & Game tion cards; John DeLapp, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ardea 94(3): 639–650
    Local movements, home ranges and body condition of Common Eiders Somateria mollissima wintering in Southwest Greenland Flemming R. Merkel1,2,*, Anders Mosbech2, Christian Sonne2, Annette Flagstad3, Knud Falk4 & Sarah E. Jamieson4 Merkel F.R., Mosbech A., Sonne C., Flagstad A., Falk K. & Jamieson S.E. 2006. Local movements, home ranges and body condition of Common Eiders Somateria mollissima wintering in Southwest Greenland. Ardea 94(3): 639–650. We examined local movements, home ranges and body condition of wintering Northern Common Eiders Somateria mollissima borealis in Southwest Greenland from late winter until spring migration in 2000 and 2001. At key marine habitats at coastal areas and in the inner fjord system of Nuuk, we implanted 33 Eiders with satellite transmitters and collected Eider carcasses for body condition analyses. Most Eiders exhib- ited strong site fidelity during the study period with a mean 95% home range size of 67.8 km2 and a mean core area (50%) of 8.1 km2. Diurnal movements peaked at dawn and dusk when birds presumably moved between feeding areas and roosting sites. Roosting occurred near day- time activity centres, on average 1.7 km apart. Among birds marked at coastal habitats only between 8% and 29% also used the inner fjord habitats, despite high levels of hunting at the coastal area. Birds that did move to the inner fjord system did not return to the coastal area. These findings accentuate the need for managing wintering Common Eiders in Southwest Greenland also at a local scale, taking site fidelity into account. The body condition of adult fjord birds was either equal or superior to that of coastal birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Bush Sort Victorieux Des Élections
    www.lemonde.fr 58e ANNÉE – N 17973 – 1,20 ¤ – FRANCE MÉTROPOLITAINE --- JEUDI 7 NOVEMBRE 2002 FONDATEUR : HUBERT BEUVE-MÉRY – DIRECTEUR : JEAN-MARIE COLOMBANI Le nouveau visage Bush sort victorieux des élections d’« aden » A mi-mandat présidentiel, le Parti républicain est majoritaire au Congrès après le scrutin du 5 novembre LES RÉPUBLICAINS ont rem- f LE GUIDE des sorties culturelles porté une victoire remarquable Le parti revient cette semaine dans une for- aux élections du mardi 5 novem- du président mule rénovée. En cinq rubriques – bre, donnant au président George Musiques, Cinéma, Scènes, Arts et W. Bush la majorité dans les deux a la majorité dans En famille –, aden, distribué en Ile- Chambres du Congrès. Mal élu en de-France, propose une sélection 2000, M. Bush voit son assise politi- les deux Chambres de sorties, de spectacles, les dates que renforcée par un succès électo- du Congrès des concerts à réserver dès mainte- ral qui lui donne une marge de nant, un choix de disques et de manœuvre plus grande encore f DVD. dans la stratégie qu’il entend sui- La Maison Blanche Autre innovation : notre supplé- vre face à l’Irak. Sur ce front-là éga- confortée ment, disponible en version Web, lement, il devrait enregistrer cette et sa newsletter sont accessibles semaine un succès avec le vote par gratuitement à l’adresse le Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU fIrak : l’ONU prête http://aden.lemonde.fr. d’une résolution très contraignan- Notre supplément te pour le régime de Bagdad. à voter la résolution Ce scrutin dit de mi-mandat pré- américaine sidentiel voit en général le parti du ROBERT HUE S’EN VA président perdre du terrain au Con- grès.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Seabirds: a Survey of Effects and Ecological Implications Junaid S
    Parasites of seabirds: A survey of effects and ecological implications Junaid S. Khan, Jennifer Provencher, Mark Forbes, Mark L Mallory, Camille Lebarbenchon, Karen Mccoy To cite this version: Junaid S. Khan, Jennifer Provencher, Mark Forbes, Mark L Mallory, Camille Lebarbenchon, et al.. Parasites of seabirds: A survey of effects and ecological implications. Advances in Marine Biology, Elsevier, 2019, 82, 10.1016/bs.amb.2019.02.001. hal-02361413 HAL Id: hal-02361413 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02361413 Submitted on 30 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Parasites of seabirds: a survey of effects and ecological implications Junaid S. Khan1, Jennifer F. Provencher1, Mark R. Forbes2, Mark L. Mallory3, Camille Lebarbenchon4, Karen D. McCoy5 1 Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, 351 Boul Saint Joseph, Gatineau, QC, Canada, J8Y 3Z5; [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1V 5BS; [email protected] 3 Department of Biology, Acadia University, 33 Westwood Ave, Wolfville NS, B4P 2R6; [email protected] 4 Université de La Réunion, UMR Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical, INSERM 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249.
    [Show full text]
  • 11–28–03 Vol. 68 No. 229 Friday Nov. 28, 2003 Pages 66693–67012
    11–28–03 Friday Vol. 68 No. 229 Nov. 28, 2003 Pages 66693–67012 VerDate jul 14 2003 21:10 Nov 26, 2003 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\28NOWS.LOC 28NOWS 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 229 / Friday, November 28, 2003 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas in America's Arctic Ocean
    Oil and Gas in America’s Arctic Ocean: Past Problems Counsel Precaution Michael LeVine, Peter Van Tuyn, Layla Hughes* “Although it can be a forbidding moonscape, the Arctic is also var- ied, majestic, serene, memorably beautiful and occasionally gentle. The far north is not only a prowling bear, a battering storm and vi- cious cold, but also a fat bumblebee buzzing among delicately yel- low arctic poppies.”1 “I believe there will not be an oil spill.”2 I. INTRODUCTION For most of history, the U.S. Arctic Ocean was protected from large-scale industrial activities by sea ice, remoteness, and plentiful re- sources in other, more accessible regions. That reality is rapidly changing as receding sea ice and the growing world demand for resources have led to increased corporate interest in the Arctic Ocean. This industrial pres- sure occurs against the backdrop of a swiftly changing climate, an ab- sence of holistic planning for the future of the region, missing scientific information, and a lack of proven technologies. The potential for industrial development in the America’s Arctic Ocean has generated substantial controversy. At the center of this con- troversy are a series of decisions made by the federal government to al- low offshore oil and gas activities in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas. * Michael LeVine is Pacific Senior Counsel for Oceana, an international nonprofit organization dedicated to maintaining and restoring ocean ecosystems. He is based in Juneau, AK. Peter Van Tuyn is an environmental attorney with the law firm Bessenyey & Van Tuyn, L.L.C., located in Anchorage, AK.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Study 2008-2015 Oceanography, College of Geosciences Texas A&M University Self-Study 2008-2015
    Self-Study 2008-2015 Oceanography, College of Geosciences Texas A&M University Self-Study 2008-2015 Executive Summary Welcome from the Department Chapter 1. Introduction to TAMU and TAMU Oceanography Chapter 2. The Mission and Goals of TAMU Oceanography Chapter 3. Evolution of the Department of Oceanography Since 2008 Chapter 4. Departmental Structure and Personnel Chapter 5. Department Resources Chapter 6. Contributions to University Research and Educational Excellence Chapter 7. Academic Programs and Curricula Chapter 8. Student Profile and Contributions Chapter 9. Concluding Observations Appendices Appendix 1: May 2014 Strategic Plan Appendix 2: Faculty Curriculum Vitae Appendix 3: Grants Awarded to the Ad-loc Faculty Appendix 4: Publications listed by year for the Ad-loc Faculty Appendix 5: Oceanography Courses Executive Summary The Department of Oceanography at Texas A&M University, founded in 1949 as the first oceanographic department established at an academic institution, is deeply committed to the unique mission of an AAU member institution with Land-, Sea-, and Space- grant status. With strengthened ties to other marine related units at the College Station and Galveston campuses, and significant investments from the University, we are poised to realize our strategic vision to join the nation’s top rank of institutions for oceanographic research and education at public universities. As part of our 2014 strategic planning effort, we have restructured our departmental educational, research and engagement activities into four interdisciplinary areas of strength: Ocean Observing Science and Technology, Marine Ecosystems Science and Health, Ocean Climate, and Ocean Energy. Observations, in a very broad sense, form the baseline for all of our strategic interdisciplinary themes, and are at the core of our vision to transform STEM education through a focus on big data competency.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Behavior and Relationships of the Eiders
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Ornithology Papers in the Biological Sciences 3-1964 Comparative Behavior and Relationships of the Eiders Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Comparative Behavior and Relationships of the Eiders" (1964). Papers in Ornithology. 63. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology/63 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Ornithology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Johnsgard in Condor (March 1964) 66(2). Copyright 1964, University of California. Used by permission. Mar., 1964 113 COMPARATIVE BEHAVIOR AND RELATIONSHIPS OF THE EIDERS By PAUL A. JOHNSGARD One of the more controversial systematic problems existing in the family Anatidae concerns the taxonomic rank and evolutionary relationships of the four speciesof eiders, which are currently considered by the American Ornithologists’ Union (1957) to com- prise three genera (Somateria, Lampronetta, and Polysticta) in the diving duck sub- family Aythyinae. In 1945, however, Delacour and Mayr included the eiders in a single genus (Somateria) within the sea duck tribe Mergini. At present, Delacour (1959) considers the eiders a separate tribe, Somateriini, distinct from the other sea ducks, and placed near the dabbling duck tribe Anatini. The erection of this new tribe, and his recognition of Polysticta as a monotypic genus for the Steller Eider, was apparently the result of Humphrey’s (MS, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office 4700 BLM Road IN REPLY REFER TO: FWS/AFES/AFWCO Anchorage, Alaska 99507-2546 May 26, 2017 Memorandum To: Dr. James Kendall, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Anchorage, Alaska From: for Stewart Cogswell, Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska Subject: Biological Opinion on Lease Sale 244 (Consultation 2016-F-0226) This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) biological opinion based on our review of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) proposed oil and gas Lease Sale 244 and its effects on the federally threatened Alaska breeding Steller’s eider (Polysticta stelleri), the federally threatened southwest Alaska distinct population segment (DPS) of northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris kenyoni), and designated critical habitat for the southwest Alaska DPS of northern sea otter, in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). We received your July 13, 2016, request for formal consultation on July 26, 2016. We have based this biological opinion on information that accompanied your July 13, 2016, request for consultation, including the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (BOEM 2016a) and biological assessment (BOEM 2016b) for oil and gas activities associated with Lease Sale 244. We can make available a record of this consultation at the Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Office. Consultation History The following is a summary of the consultation history for this project: • July 26, 2016, the Service received a Biological Assessment and request from BOEM to initiate formal consultation for effects caused by activities from oil and gas lease sale 244 in lower Cook Inlet.
    [Show full text]