Biological Opinion for the National Petroleum Reserve – Alaska Integrated Activity Plan 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biological Opinion for the National Petroleum Reserve – Alaska Integrated Activity Plan 2013 F8 Biological Opinion for the National Petroleum Reserve – Alaska Integrated Activity Plan 2013 Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office 101 12th Ave, Room 110 Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 February 5, 2013 1 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 9 The Action Area ............................................................................................................................ 12 The Proposed Action..................................................................................................................... 12 Actions Common to Multiple Oil and Gas Activities ........................................................... 14 Staging Areas .................................................................................................................... 14 Aircraft Flights .................................................................................................................. 14 Construction of Roads (gravel and winter ice roads) ........................................................ 14 Summer support work ....................................................................................................... 17 Management of wastes ...................................................................................................... 17 Development and Production Scenario ................................................................................. 17 Exploration ........................................................................................................................ 17 Location of Development ................................................................................................. 18 Field Development ............................................................................................................ 18 Gravel Drill-Pad and Road Construction .......................................................................... 19 Production ......................................................................................................................... 20 Oil Pipeline Infrastructure ................................................................................................. 20 Gas Pipeline Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 21 Watercraft Support to Production Facilities ..................................................................... 21 Abandonment and Restoration .......................................................................................... 22 Non-oil and Gas Activities.................................................................................................... 22 Aircraft Use, Takeoffs, and Landings ............................................................................... 22 Watercraft Use .................................................................................................................. 22 Excavation and Collection ................................................................................................ 22 Ground Activities and Camps ........................................................................................... 22 Overland Moves and Other Land Use Permits ................................................................. 23 Contaminated Sites ........................................................................................................... 23 Recreation and Film Permits ............................................................................................. 24 Pre-Development Environmental Studies for Offshore Development ............................. 24 Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ..................................................................................... 25 Spectacled Eiders ...................................................................................................................... 25 Status and Distribution .......................................................................................................... 25 Life History ........................................................................................................................... 26 Breeding–North Slope Population .................................................................................... 26 2 Post-breeding – North Slope ............................................................................................. 27 Molt ................................................................................................................................... 28 Wintering .......................................................................................................................... 28 Late Winter/Spring............................................................................................................ 28 Abundance and Trends ......................................................................................................... 30 Spectacled Eider Recovery Criteria ...................................................................................... 30 Steller’s Eiders .......................................................................................................................... 31 Status and Distribution .......................................................................................................... 31 Life History ........................................................................................................................... 32 North Slope Breeding ....................................................................................................... 32 Use of Non-breeding Habitats .......................................................................................... 35 Molt and Winter Distribution............................................................................................ 37 Northward Spring Migration............................................................................................. 38 Recovery Criteria .................................................................................................................. 38 Polar Bear.................................................................................................................................. 39 Status and Distribution .......................................................................................................... 39 Life History ........................................................................................................................... 40 Threats to the Polar Bear....................................................................................................... 41 Polar Bear Critical Habitat ........................................................................................................ 41 Environmental Baseline ................................................................................................................ 43 Spectacled and Steller’s Eiders ................................................................................................. 43 Spring migration ................................................................................................................... 46 Breeding and Brood- rearing ................................................................................................ 46 Post-breeding ........................................................................................................................ 48 Possible Threats in the Action Area ...................................................................................... 49 Toxic Contamination of Habitat ....................................................................................... 49 Increased Predator Populations ......................................................................................... 50 Subsistence Harvest .......................................................................................................... 51 Impacts from Development and Disturbance ................................................................... 51 Previously Consulted on Federal Projects ............................................................................ 51 Research Impacts .............................................................................................................. 54 Climate Change ................................................................................................................. 54 Polar Bears ................................................................................................................................ 56 Alaska-Chukotka Stock ........................................................................................................ 57 3 Southern Beaufort Sea Stock ................................................................................................ 58 Threats and Possible Stressors in the Action Area ............................................................... 58 Subsistence Harvest .......................................................................................................... 58 Polar Bear Research .............................................................................................................. 59 Incidental Take Regulations ................................................................................................. 59 Deterrence Activities and
Recommended publications
  • Oversight and Reauthorization Hearing on the Rehabilitation Act of 1983
    DOCUMEIIT RESUME ED 249 748 EC 170 860 TITLE Ove- ght and Reauthorization Hearing on the Rehabilitation Act of 1983. Bearings before the Subcot 'Nitta. on Select Education of the Committee on Education and Labor. Rouse of Representatives, Ninety -- Eighth Congress, First Session Narch 21 and 23, 1983). INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C.Rouse Commettee on Education and Labor. PUB DATE 84; NOTE ' FUR TYPE 4114*I 1/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE NFO1 /FC18 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Compliance (Legal); Disabilities; *Federal Legislation; Federal Programs; Bearings; Rehabilitation; *Vocational Rehabilitation 'IDENTIFIERS *Rehabilitation Act 1973 ABSTRACT Excerpts are presented from the March 1983 hearings on oversight and reauthorization of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Prepared statements are included from federal officials; representatives of professional rehabilitation and education associations and state and local agencies; etudents; and other interested persons. In addition to the statements, letters and supplemental materials on the topic are also, provided from associations, agencies, university faculty, and federal officials. The statements touch on amendisents to the act, provisions for independent living, rehabilitation research, and rehabilitation training. (CL) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRA are the best that can be made from the original document. ***********************************************************************
    [Show full text]
  • Ardea 94(3): 639–650
    Local movements, home ranges and body condition of Common Eiders Somateria mollissima wintering in Southwest Greenland Flemming R. Merkel1,2,*, Anders Mosbech2, Christian Sonne2, Annette Flagstad3, Knud Falk4 & Sarah E. Jamieson4 Merkel F.R., Mosbech A., Sonne C., Flagstad A., Falk K. & Jamieson S.E. 2006. Local movements, home ranges and body condition of Common Eiders Somateria mollissima wintering in Southwest Greenland. Ardea 94(3): 639–650. We examined local movements, home ranges and body condition of wintering Northern Common Eiders Somateria mollissima borealis in Southwest Greenland from late winter until spring migration in 2000 and 2001. At key marine habitats at coastal areas and in the inner fjord system of Nuuk, we implanted 33 Eiders with satellite transmitters and collected Eider carcasses for body condition analyses. Most Eiders exhib- ited strong site fidelity during the study period with a mean 95% home range size of 67.8 km2 and a mean core area (50%) of 8.1 km2. Diurnal movements peaked at dawn and dusk when birds presumably moved between feeding areas and roosting sites. Roosting occurred near day- time activity centres, on average 1.7 km apart. Among birds marked at coastal habitats only between 8% and 29% also used the inner fjord habitats, despite high levels of hunting at the coastal area. Birds that did move to the inner fjord system did not return to the coastal area. These findings accentuate the need for managing wintering Common Eiders in Southwest Greenland also at a local scale, taking site fidelity into account. The body condition of adult fjord birds was either equal or superior to that of coastal birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Bush Sort Victorieux Des Élections
    www.lemonde.fr 58e ANNÉE – N 17973 – 1,20 ¤ – FRANCE MÉTROPOLITAINE --- JEUDI 7 NOVEMBRE 2002 FONDATEUR : HUBERT BEUVE-MÉRY – DIRECTEUR : JEAN-MARIE COLOMBANI Le nouveau visage Bush sort victorieux des élections d’« aden » A mi-mandat présidentiel, le Parti républicain est majoritaire au Congrès après le scrutin du 5 novembre LES RÉPUBLICAINS ont rem- f LE GUIDE des sorties culturelles porté une victoire remarquable Le parti revient cette semaine dans une for- aux élections du mardi 5 novem- du président mule rénovée. En cinq rubriques – bre, donnant au président George Musiques, Cinéma, Scènes, Arts et W. Bush la majorité dans les deux a la majorité dans En famille –, aden, distribué en Ile- Chambres du Congrès. Mal élu en de-France, propose une sélection 2000, M. Bush voit son assise politi- les deux Chambres de sorties, de spectacles, les dates que renforcée par un succès électo- du Congrès des concerts à réserver dès mainte- ral qui lui donne une marge de nant, un choix de disques et de manœuvre plus grande encore f DVD. dans la stratégie qu’il entend sui- La Maison Blanche Autre innovation : notre supplé- vre face à l’Irak. Sur ce front-là éga- confortée ment, disponible en version Web, lement, il devrait enregistrer cette et sa newsletter sont accessibles semaine un succès avec le vote par gratuitement à l’adresse le Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU fIrak : l’ONU prête http://aden.lemonde.fr. d’une résolution très contraignan- Notre supplément te pour le régime de Bagdad. à voter la résolution Ce scrutin dit de mi-mandat pré- américaine sidentiel voit en général le parti du ROBERT HUE S’EN VA président perdre du terrain au Con- grès.
    [Show full text]
  • Jons New Colville River200326ja
    U. S. Department of the Interior BLM-Alaska Open File Report 96 Bureau of Land Management BLM/AK/ST-009+7200+930 December 2003 Alaska State Office 222 West 7th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Water Resources of the Colville River Special Area, National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska By Jon Kostohrys, Kristine Kosnik, and Ethan Scott Cover Photo The Colville River flows on the northern slope of the Brooks Range in northern Alaska. Disclaimer The mention of trade names or commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the federal government. Authors Jon Kostohrys is a hydrologist with the Bureau of Land Management, Northern Field Office, in Fairbanks, Alaska. Kristine Kosnik is a GIS specialist at the Northern Field Office. Ethan Scott, formerly an ECO Associate in Fairbanks, is a graduate student in Montana. Open File Reports Open File Reports issued by the Bureau of Land Management-Alaska present the results of invento- ries or other investigations on a variety of scientific and technical subjects that are made available to the public outside the formal BLM-Alaska technical publication series. These reports can include preliminary or incomplete data and are not published or distributed in quantity. The reports are available while supplies last from BLM External Affairs, 222 West 7th Avenue #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513, telephone (907) 271-3318; and from the Juneau - John Rishel Minerals Information Center, 100 Savikko Road, Mayflower Island, Douglas, AK 99824, (907) 364-1553. Copies are also available for inspection at the Alaska Resource Library and Information Service (Anchorage), the USDI Resources Library in Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Seabirds: a Survey of Effects and Ecological Implications Junaid S
    Parasites of seabirds: A survey of effects and ecological implications Junaid S. Khan, Jennifer Provencher, Mark Forbes, Mark L Mallory, Camille Lebarbenchon, Karen Mccoy To cite this version: Junaid S. Khan, Jennifer Provencher, Mark Forbes, Mark L Mallory, Camille Lebarbenchon, et al.. Parasites of seabirds: A survey of effects and ecological implications. Advances in Marine Biology, Elsevier, 2019, 82, 10.1016/bs.amb.2019.02.001. hal-02361413 HAL Id: hal-02361413 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02361413 Submitted on 30 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Parasites of seabirds: a survey of effects and ecological implications Junaid S. Khan1, Jennifer F. Provencher1, Mark R. Forbes2, Mark L. Mallory3, Camille Lebarbenchon4, Karen D. McCoy5 1 Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, 351 Boul Saint Joseph, Gatineau, QC, Canada, J8Y 3Z5; [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1V 5BS; [email protected] 3 Department of Biology, Acadia University, 33 Westwood Ave, Wolfville NS, B4P 2R6; [email protected] 4 Université de La Réunion, UMR Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical, INSERM 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas in America's Arctic Ocean
    Oil and Gas in America’s Arctic Ocean: Past Problems Counsel Precaution Michael LeVine, Peter Van Tuyn, Layla Hughes* “Although it can be a forbidding moonscape, the Arctic is also var- ied, majestic, serene, memorably beautiful and occasionally gentle. The far north is not only a prowling bear, a battering storm and vi- cious cold, but also a fat bumblebee buzzing among delicately yel- low arctic poppies.”1 “I believe there will not be an oil spill.”2 I. INTRODUCTION For most of history, the U.S. Arctic Ocean was protected from large-scale industrial activities by sea ice, remoteness, and plentiful re- sources in other, more accessible regions. That reality is rapidly changing as receding sea ice and the growing world demand for resources have led to increased corporate interest in the Arctic Ocean. This industrial pres- sure occurs against the backdrop of a swiftly changing climate, an ab- sence of holistic planning for the future of the region, missing scientific information, and a lack of proven technologies. The potential for industrial development in the America’s Arctic Ocean has generated substantial controversy. At the center of this con- troversy are a series of decisions made by the federal government to al- low offshore oil and gas activities in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas. * Michael LeVine is Pacific Senior Counsel for Oceana, an international nonprofit organization dedicated to maintaining and restoring ocean ecosystems. He is based in Juneau, AK. Peter Van Tuyn is an environmental attorney with the law firm Bessenyey & Van Tuyn, L.L.C., located in Anchorage, AK.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River Sporting Club Development Permit 02-0024
    Snake River Fund letter - Snake River Sporting Club Development Permit 02-0024 violations ait.d Baecker <[email protected]> Tue 11/13/2018 1:12 PM io’ Haruifton Smith <[email protected]>; Susan Johnson <[email protected]>; Chandler Windorn <cwi ndorn (Otetoncountywy.gov>; Cc.Board Of County Commissioners <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Mary Moore <[email protected]>; David Cernicek <[email protected]>; Michael T Happold <[email protected]>; Luther Propst <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; I urn ,in,nnt.s 213 KB) 20181113SRF_TCPD_SRSC,,yiohitions letter.pdf; Dear Susan, Humilton & Chandler (as well as CC’d parties): Pime,e find the Snake River Fund’s ,ittaclred kttei imploring Teton County and other agency partners to follow the law, rules, and procedtire set forth in tue tnm rim’, of eton County’s Development Permit 02—0024 issued Snake River Sporting Club and its agents. Viukriams of this cievimlopriment permit and its conditions are evident. The Wilc] and Scernic Snake River needs to be protect from these very actions. The Snake River is a local and national asset. Locally the Snake River is both arid ecological and economic artery to our community. Nationally, the Snake River is an icon of free flowing wildness. Uphold tIre rules, regulations, and laws of our land, deny all after—the-fact perrrrt applications before you with regaids to bank stabilization and channel nltwahons on the Snake River, its side channels and banks. Si ice rely, Jared Baeckei Jared Baecker Executive Dir ector Snake River Func) iC k’ ‘NY 83002 0: (307) 734-6773 C: 307) 200-1653 To stop receiving messages from Board Of County Commissioners group, stop following it, Snake River Fund PC Box 7033 Jackson, WY 83002 307-734-6773 snake rivet f tin d.c ig in to @5 flake river t u n d.c r g Susan Johnson November 13, 2018 Hamilton Smith Chandler Windom Teton County Planning Department 200 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of the Colville River Special Area, National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska
    U. S. Department of the Interior BLM-Alaska Open File Report 96 Bureau of Land Management BLM/AK/ST-009+7200+930 December 2003 Alaska State Office 222 West 7th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Water Resources of the Colville River Special Area, National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska By Jon Kostohrys, Kristine Kosnik, and Ethan Scott Cover Photo The Colville River flows on the northern slope of the Brooks Range in northern Alaska. Disclaimer The mention of trade names or commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the federal government. Authors Jon Kostohrys is a hydrologist with the Bureau of Land Management, Northern Field Office, in Fairbanks, Alaska. Kristine Kosnik is a GIS specialist at the Northern Field Office. Ethan Scott, formerly an ECO Associate in Fairbanks, is a graduate student in Montana. Open File Reports Open File Reports issued by the Bureau of Land Management-Alaska present the results of invento- ries or other investigations on a variety of scientific and technical subjects that are made available to the public outside the formal BLM-Alaska technical publication series. These reports can include preliminary or incomplete data and are not published or distributed in quantity. The reports are available while supplies last from BLM External Affairs, 222 West 7th Avenue #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513, telephone (907) 271-3318; and from the Juneau - John Rishel Minerals Information Center, 100 Savikko Road, Mayflower Island, Douglas, AK 99824, (907) 364-1553. Copies are also available for inspection at the Alaska Resource Library and Information Service (Anchorage), the USDI Resources Library in Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Lcfs15isor.Pdf
    California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board STAFF REPORT: INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR PROPOSED RULEMAKING PROPOSED RE-ADOPTION OF THE LOW CARBON FUEL STANDARD Industrial Strategies Division Transportation Fuels Branch Oil & Gas and GHG Mitigation Branch December 2014 This Page Left Intentionally Blank State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD STAFF REPORT: INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR RULEMAKING PROPOSED RE-ADOPTION OF THE LOW CARBON FUEL STANDARD REGULATION Date of Release: January 2, 2015 Scheduled for Consideration: February 19, 2015 This report has been reviewed by the staff of the California Air Resources Board and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD This Page Left Intentionally Blank Acknowledgments This report was prepared with the assistance and support from many individuals within the Air Resources Board. In addition, staff would like to acknowledge the assistance and cooperation from many individuals from other divisions and offices of the Air Resources Board, whose contributions throughout the development process have been invaluable. Staff would like to acknowledge the cooperation from the numerous State, federal, and governmental agencies that have provided assistance throughout the rulemaking process. Staff would also like to acknowledge the invaluable
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory and Cataloging of Sport Fish and Sport Fish Waters of Western Alaska
    Volume 20 Study G-I-P STATE OF ALASKA Jay S. Hammond, Govermr Annual Performance Report for INVENTORY AND CATALOGING OF SPORT FISH AND SPORT FISH WATERS OF WESTERN ALASKA ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Ronald 0. Skoog, Commissioner SPORT FISH DIVISION Rupert E. Andrews, Director Job No. G-I-P Inventory and Cataloging of Sport Fish and Sport Fish Waters of Western Alaska By: Kenneth T. Alt Abstract Background Recommendations Management Research Ob j ectives Techniques Used Findings Nome Area Angler Utilization Nome River Other Seward Peninsula Streams Comparisons of Sport Fishing in Nome Area Waters 1977 and 1978 Job No. G-I-P (cont.) Nome River Study Physical and Chemical Characteristics Biological Aspects of Nome River Fish Movements and Abundance Arctic Char Salmon Whitefish Grayling Other Species Age and Growth Salmon Arctic Char Grayling Least Cisco Round Whitefish Bering Cisco Kotzebue Sound - Hotham Inlet Survey Species Accounts Least Cisco Humpback Whitefish Broad Whitefish Northern Pike Other Species Sheefish Herring Literature Cited LIST OF TABLES Table 1. List of species captured in Colville River drainage in 1977-1978. Table 2. Species composition of streams surveyed within the North Slope Study Area, 1977-1978. Table 3. Physical characteristics of under-ice net sites in the Colville River near Umiat. Table 4. Numbers of principal fish species captured in the Colville River during fall and spring of 1977 and 1978. LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Map of Alaska showing the North Slope Study Area. Figure 2. Preliminary data on migration and spawning times of the principal salmonid species in the Colville River.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hansen Shipping Photographic Collection
    The Hansen Shipping Photographic Collection A Catalogue Compiled By Donald A. Taylor The Hansen Shipping Photographic Collection Name of Vessel Catalogue Type Engine Position Flag View of Dock Other Vessels Supplemetary Approx. date of Number of Mach. Vessel Information photo A960 (HMS) 3475/83A ? UK ¾ S Bow Cardiff 1972/4 A961 (HMS) 3661/10D ? UK Stern Cardiff Lock Tug (Stern) 1972/4 LOWGARTH A961 (HMS) 3662/10D ? UK P Bow Cardiff 1972/4 A961 (HMS) 3663/10D ? UK P Bow Cardiff 1972/4 A961 (HMS) 3664/10D ? UK ¾ P Bow Cardiff 1972/4 A961 (HMS) 3665/10D ? UK ¾ S Stn Cardiff 1972/4 * A ANDREEW 448/756 GC M AFT USSR P Bs Cardiff FP Timber deck 1936/7 cargo A J FALKLAND 2676/2707 GC ST MID SW P Bow Cardiff FP Timber deck 1948/9 cargo A L KENT 2820/2842 GC ST MID PA ¾ P Bow Penarth Head Watermans boat 3 IS 1949 AAGOT 386/694 GC ST MID F ¾ P Bow Penarth Head Watermans boat 3 IS Deck cargo pit 1936/7 props AAGOT 392/700 GC ST MID F S Bs 3 IS Deck cargo pit 1936/7 props AASE MAERSK 1851/1929 T M AFT D ¾ S Bow 3 IS 23/12/1947 ABELONE VENDILA 3392/25A GC M MID D S Bs Cardiff 3 IS Timber deck 1962/3 cargo * ABSALON 420/728 GC ST MID D P Bs 3 IS Timber deck 1936/7 cargo, Discharging * ABSIRTEA 414/722 GC ST MID I P Bs Penarth Head Watermans boat, Tug WDA 1936/7 ABU 3390/23A T M AFT NY S Bow Cardiff FP 1964/5 ABGARA 406/714 GC ST MID LA P Bs Cardiff 3 IS 1936/7 ACAVUS 2229/2287 T M AFT UK ¾ S Stn Cardiff 3 IS 1948 ACHEO 1518/1615 Cable Layer ST MID I ¾ S Bow FD 13/05/1947 ACROPOLIS 2946/2966 GC ST MID PA P Bs Cardiff LBD 1950 ACROPOLIS 2947/2966 GC ST MID PA P Bs Cardiff LBD 1950 ACTUALITY 2276/2331 C M AFT UK ¾ S Stn RQ 1948 ADAK 3467/77A Bulk Ore M AFT SW P Stn Cardiff FP 1972/4 HMS ADAMANT 3431/52A S UK ¾ S Bow Tug - WELSH ROSE HMS ADAMANT 3432/52A S UK ¾ S Bow HMS ADAMANT 3433/52A S UK ¾ S Bow Entering Cardiff HMS ADAMANT 3434/52A S UK ¾ S Bow Entering Cardiff Similar Amgueddfa Cymru - National Museum Wales 1 of 146 The Hansen Shipping Photographic Collection HMS ADAMANT 3435/52A S UK ¾ S Bow 4 Tugs HMS ADAMANT 3436/52A S UK S Quarter Cardiff ADAMTIOS J.
    [Show full text]
  • Bathymetry in the Strait of Belle Isle
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! L'Anse Amour ! -80 -60 ! Forteau -50 ! ± LABRADOR TROUGH LABRADOR COASTAL -100 ZONE -80 -80 -1 00 L'Anse-au-Clair ! CENTRE BANK NORTH -90 ! -50 CENTRE BANK SOUTH -40 -60 0 -100 Green Island Cove 5 -60 ! - -80 -90 ! Pines Cove ! -100 Shoal Cove ! Sandy Cove ! NEWFOUNDLAND TROUGH -10 -20 Savage Cove ! -9 0 -30 Bathymetry Lines (10 m interval) 00 -1 Submarine Cable Crossing Corridor - ! 1 0 0 0 NEWFOUNDLAND -1 0 Bathymetry * COASTAL High : 127.09 -2 Flower's Cove ZONE0 ! -70 Low : -0.16 Sources: * Fugro Jacques (2007) Location of troughs and banks from Woodworth-Lynas et al. (1992). -60 FIGURE ID: HVDC_ST_406a ! 0 3 6 0 Kilometres -5 -80 ! ! FIGURE 10.5.2-2 ! Bathymetry in the Strait of Belle Isle ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
    [Show full text]