Romania's Anti-Terrorist Brigade Extends 2007, Pp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Romania's Anti-Terrorist Brigade Extends 2007, Pp ROMANIA’S ANTI - TERRORISM CAPABILITIES: TRANSFORMATION, COOPERATION, EFFECTIVENESS Florina Cristiana MATEI Lecturer, Center for Civil-Military Relations (CCMR) Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) Monterey, CA, USA Fighting terrorism effectively is not a new security responsibility for the security forces in Romania. Terrorism has been a menace to Romania’s national security before 1989, and for years during the Communist regime, Securitate’s anti-terrorist elite force’s acumen had averted terrorist attacks. Yet, Cold War terrorism is dif- ferent from Twenty-First Century terrorism. What changed after the fall of the Iron Curtain, and chiefl y after the atrocious terrorist attacks in the United States (US) on September 11, 2001 (9/11), was the lethality and virulence of terrorists’ intents and goals. Attacks in the US, Spain, Great Britain, and others urged Romania (as much as other countries) transform its overall security system to be able to fi ght terrorism and terrorist networks, as well as other asymmetric security threats and challenges, effectively and collaboratively. This paper reviews Romania’s security system post-Cold War transformation, in pursuit of effectively averting, countering and combating terrorism. Key words: Romania’s anti-terrorism, Romania’s anti-terrorism cooperation, Romania’s counter-terrorism reform, South Eastern Europe’s anti-terrorism, South Eastern Europe’s security cooperation. 1. INTRODUCTION (US) on September 11, 2001 (9/11), was the lethality and virulence of Fighting terrorism effectively terrorists’ intents and goals. Attacks is not a new security responsibility in the US, Spain, Great Britain, and for the security forces in Romania. others urged Romania (as much as Terrorism has been a menace to other countries) transform its overall Romania’s national security before security system to be able to fi ght 1989 [1], and for years during the terrorism and terrorist networks, as Communist regime, Securitate’s well as other asymmetric security anti-terrorist elite force’s acumen threats and challenges, effectively [2] had averted terrorist attacks. Yet, and collaboratively. This paper Cold War terrorism is different from reviews Romania’s security system Twenty-First Century terrorism. post-Cold War transformation, What changed after the fall of the Iron in pursuit of effectively averting, Curtain, and chiefl y after the atrocious countering and combating terrorism. terrorist attacks in the United States 2. ROMANIA’S SECURITY 4. REFORM AND INSTITUTIONS TRANSFORMATION TO FIGHT TERRORISM Romania’s security forces include the armed forces (army, navy, air Fighting terrorism effectively force) under the Ministry of Defense calls for a modern, agile, resilient, and (MOD), police forces (gendarmerie, multi-tasking security system. To this border, etc.) under the Ministry of end, especially after 9/11, Romania Administration and Internal Affairs, has channeled its countering and and six [3] intelligence agencies. combating terrorism efforts toward improved terrorism prevention, 3. TERRORIST THREAT counter-terrorism intervention, TO ROMANIA'S SECURITY and consequence management capabilities. These endeavors have Terrorism does not pose a major enveloped, inter alia, the following: threat to Romania’s security. Yet, - a more robust anti-terrorism Romania could become a terrorist (AT) and counter-terrorism (CT) target for a variety of reasons. First is legal framework; Romania’s membership (and Eastern - effective and timely intelligence Border) in Western collective security (organization, structures, personnel institutions such as the North Atlantic [including education and training], Treaty Organization (NATO) and quality of analysis, and equipment); the European Union (EU), whose - more agile security forces, countries have often become terrorist increased information sharing, targets [4]. coordination and cooperation; - improved capabilities of tracking Second is Romania’s unstable down and weeding out any human, geographical surroundings fi nancial, logistic and operational (neighboring the Black Sea and the involvement and/or support for Balkans yet not far from the Caucasus terrorist activities; and Near East) [5]. - strengthened intervention Third is the relatively high capabilities (capturing terrorists, Muslim/Arabic representation in freeing hostages, reinstating order); Romania, which may transform it - better guard and protection into a hub for terrorist traffi c targeting capabilities and activities; civil both Romania and other countries. emergencies, public affairs, and [6] outreach activities. Fourth, even without a “direct” Muslim threat, [7] Romania’s 4.1. STRENGTHENED friendly relations with the US, the ANTI-TERRORISM implementation of the relocation of LEGAL FRAMEWORK US military bases in Romania since As mentioned earlier, terrorism 2007, and its contribution to the has long been a security concern international anti-terrorist efforts for Romania. As a result, its AT/ and peace operations could, as well, CT legal framework started to make Romania a target. develop in the early 1960s, and, as expected, has undergone some 4.2. ROMANIA’S changes after 9/11, as demanded NATIONAL SYSTEM by the new security environment, ON PREVENTING AND Romania’s determination to join COMBATING TERRORISM the international arena in averting, countering, and combating terrorism, Given the multifarious, easily as well as by the requirements of adjustable, network-style nature of NATO/EU membership. Post 9/11 the terrorist groups, it became clear legislation stipulates, besides other to the Romanian security decision provisions, increased anti-terrorism makers that effectively fi ghting powers and responsibilities for the terrorism defi nitely not be the security sector, and heightened job of one agency, but rather, the cooperation. outcome of a concerted action of a A few of the most relevant AT/ variety of security institutions. In CT laws include: all thirteen United this context, in 2001, the National Nations (UN) conventions on Supreme Defense Council (CSAT), as the strategic coordinator of anti- combating terrorism; UN Security terrorism strategies and policies, Council Resolutions 1540 (on arm designated the SRI the nation’s main proliferation and ballistic missiles), authority (technical coordinator) in 1566 (against international terrorism) AT/CT activities. The SRI is hence and 1373 (which set up the Anti- authorized to conduct independently Terrorism Committee); Government or, if needed, in cooperation and Emergency Ordinance 141/2001; coordination with other security Government Emergency Ordinance forces, anti-, counter- and combating 159/2001; Law 51/1991 on National terrorism operations.[8] During the Security; Romanian Penal Code; same year, the SRI had established Law 14/1992 (which assigned SRI a Department for Preventing and the main roles and mission with Combating Terrorism (DPCT), regard to terrorism prevention and featuring a Center of Counter-Terrorist countering); Law on the approval of Operational Coordination (CCOA) the Government Emergency 1/1999 as a permanent technical coordinator on the state of siege and state of of the interacting agencies within the emergency; Law 535/2004 on National System on Preventing and preventing and combating terrorism; Combating Terrorism (SNPCT) – Law 42/2004 on the armed forces’ an integrated structure focusing on participation in missions outside prevention and countering terrorist Romanian territory; Methodology threats, which was, at that time, of the organization and execution pending becoming operational.[9] of counter-terrorism intervention The CCOA is charged with collection, analysis, and fi eld intervention. of 2006; Strategy of information [10] In 2002 a National Strategy on communication on the prevention Preventing and Combating Terrorism and limitation of a terrorist risk and was adopted, which regulates the terrorist crisis situation, of 2007; roles of all security institutions, other strategies, doctrines, and together with a General Protocol rules. on the organization and functioning of the SNPCT.[11] The SNPCT Romanian Intelligence Service became fully [12] operational in (SRI). As previously stated, AT/ 2005 after the CSAT’s adoption of a CT transformation after 9/11 has Regulation on the Organization and started with SRI’s becoming the Functioning of the CCOA. [13] The anti-terrorism leader in the country. SNPCT is tasked with preventing and Its Department for Preventing and combating terrorism via consultative, Combating Terrorism (DPCT) is the cooperative and collaborative efforts coordinator of Romania’s domestic with additional security agencies in AT/CT efforts, charged with the Romania and foreign counterparts integrated planning, organization, abroad.[14] implementation and execution of all Each SNPCT component has as activities involving the prevention, well undergone transformation in detection, and annihilation of terrorist view of better tackling the vagaries activities and actions in the country. of the world’s current security [15] Its intelligence component is landscape. This paper will further charged with collection and analysis dwell upon the transformation of the on all national security risks, security forces’ specifi c anti-terrorism challenges and threats, including roles, missions, and capabilities. terrorism. [16] DGPCT’s operational component, the AT Brigade (BA), elite intervention unit, trained in the created on the ruins of Securitate’s U.S. at Delta bases, and in Great former Special Unit for Fighting
Recommended publications
  • Article Intelligence Sector Reforms in Romania: a Scorecard
    Intelligence Sector Reforms in Romania: A Article Scorecard Lavinia Stan Marian Zulean St. Francis Xavier University, Canada University of Bucharest, Romania [email protected] Abstract Since 1989, reforms have sought to align the Romanian post-communist intelligence community with its counterparts in established democracies. Enacted reluctantly and belatedly at the pressure of civil society actors eager to curb the mass surveillance of communist times and international partners wishing to rein in Romania’s foreign espionage and cut its ties to intelligence services of non-NATO countries, these reforms have revamped legislation on state security, retrained secret agents, and allowed for participation in NATO operations, but paid less attention to oversight and respect for human rights. Drawing on democratization, transitional justice, and security studies, this article evaluates the capacity of the Romanian post-communist intelligence reforms to break with communist security practices of unchecked surveillance and repression and to adopt democratic values of oversight and respect for human rights. We discuss the presence of communist traits after 1989 (seen as continuity) and their absence (seen as discontinuity) by offering a wealth of examples. The article is the first to evaluate security reforms in post- communist Romania in terms of their capacity to not only overhaul the personnel and operations inherited from the Securitate and strengthen oversight by elected officials, but also make intelligence services respectful of basic human rights. Introduction Since transitioning away from communist dictatorship in 1989, Romania has become a liberal democracy and a member of the European Union (EU) and NATO. As elsewhere in Central and Eastern Europe where the communist secret police had conducted repression, in Romania the backbone of democratization was represented by reforms of the intelligence community, understood to comprise all of the intelligence services operating in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Communist Romania
    Political Science • Eastern Europe Carey Edited by Henry F. Carey Foreword by Norman Manea “Henry Carey’s collection captures with great precision the complex, contradic- tory reality of contemporary Romania. Bringing together Romanian, West European, and American authors from fields as diverse as anthropology, politi- Romania cal science, economics, law, print and broadcast journalism, social work, and lit- ROMANIA SINCE 1989 erature, the volume covers vast ground, but with striking detail and scholarship and a common core approach. Romania since 1989 provides perhaps the most comprehensive view of the continuing, murky, contested reality that is Romania today and is a must read for any scholar of modern Romania, of East-Central Europe, and of the uncertain, troubled, post-socialist era.” since 1989 —David A. Kideckel, Central Connecticut State University Sorin Antohi “The wealth of detail and quality of insights will make this an excellent source- Wally Bacon book for students of political change after the Cold War. It should be taken seri- Gabriel Ba˘ descu ously by policy practitioners increasingly involved with Romania’s problems.” Zoltan Barany —Tom Gallagher, Professor of Peace Studies, Bradford University, U.K. Politics, Jóhanna Kristín Birnir Larry S. Bush Those who study Romania must confront the theoretical challenges posed by a Economics, Pavel Câmpeanu country that is undergoing a profound transformation from a repressive totali- Henry F. Carey tarian regime to a hazy and as yet unrealized democratic government. The most and Society Daniel Da˘ ianu comprehensive survey of Romanian politics and society ever published abroad, Dennis Deletant this volume represents an effort to collect and analyze data on the complex prob- Christopher Eisterhold lems of Romania’s past and its transition into an uncertain future.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Transition Guide
    MEMORY OF NATIONS Democratic Transition Guide [ The Argentine Experience ] DISMANTLING THE STATE SECURITY APPARATUS SERGIO GABRIEL EISSA INTRODUCTION the tradition of using the military in tasks of “internal security.” For example, during the imposition of the political and economic In Argentina, there were six (6) coups d’état between 1930 and model of Buenos Aires on the rest of the provinces (1820–1862); 1976. However, the use of violence to resolve political conflicts the struggle against the native peoples (1878–1919); in the re- in the country can be traced back to the years after the War of pression of social protests such as the Tragic Week (1919) and Independence (1810–1824). Indeed, the constitutive process the Rebel Patagonia (1920–1921); and the protests of radicals, of a “violent normality”1 has its roots in a way of doing politics anarchists, socialists and trade unionists between 1890–1955. legitimized by the social and political actors, military and civil, The practices listed in the preceding paragraph were fuelled during the process of building the National State. by the incorporation of the French and American counterin- The use of violence to modify a correlation of political forces surgency doctrines in the context of Argentina’s accession to continued beyond the approval of the National Constitution in the Western bloc during the Cold War (1947–1991).5 In fact, in 1853. In the following years, Bartolomé Mitre carried out “the first that country this doctrine was first reflected in the “Plan Con- coup d’état” against the government of President Santiago Derqui intes” (1959), which consisted of using the Armed Forces6 and (1860–1861) in 1861, the same politician took up arms in 1874 the security forces to repress the “internal ideological enemy”: when he considered that he had lost the presidential elections mainly Peronist and leftist militants, but also any opponent of fraudulently.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft the Guardian Angel Vol 2
    PREFACE There is no way I can begin my second volume of the trilogy “MICROSOFT – the Guardian Angel” without firstly focusing on one of the most serious allegations in my first book, issued in June, an allegation that was also printed on cover IV of the volume. I quote accurately: As a result of five years of reporter investigations, I have the feeling that the IT giant was imposed on the market using heavy political police instruments. Even if no blame can be brought – for now – on Bill Gates’ company, the mega-business has only one beneficiary: the MICROSOFT COMPANY. Consequently we will have to shed some light on my legitimate interest in this trilogy. I have also taken to make the case public to meet the directions and recommendations of the European Union, which call for such situations be made public, throughout the entire community territory, precisely for a broader acknowledgement of the criminal phenomenon and of high level corruption. In other words, to quote Monica Macovei a Romanian EP: “let’s not pretend we’re unaware” of what this is about and how we should go about the generalized corruption in Romania. This is because Europe considers software and IT&C development as a strategic field, 8 MICROSOFT THE GUARDIAN ANGEL - UM 0666 9 of major importance for innovations in information categories as “ok”, “uncertain” and “action needed” technology, so that the old continent should be in the (see Appendix 1). position to enter an equal competition with the USA, Likewise, the ECIS Report speaks about on legal grounds, mutually agreed by the two parties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Institution of Presidential Impeachmnet In
    THE INSTITUTION OF PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT IN SEMI-PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEMS -CASE STUDY OF ROMANIA- By Valentina-Andreea Dimulescu Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Political Science Supervisor: Professor Nenad Dimitrijevic CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2009 i ABSTRACT The present paper examines the institution of presidential impeachment in countries displaying a semi-presidential institutional design. More specifically, it addresses the question whether the functioning of impeachment can be attributed to the particular institutional arrangement mirrored in the specific interactions between the state actors involved – the president, parliament and PM – or by non-institutional factors such as the president’s actions throughout his/her tenure which can be considered as having violated the constitutional text. The methodology used is the case study of the 2007 Romanian presidential impeachment against Traian Băsescu. The principal finding is that it is difficult to point to a clear, mono- causal relationship between the tensions caused by semi-presidentialism and the practice of impeachment since the impeachment of the head of state is not a common practice in countries that display semi-presidential features. The Romanian case represents a situation where the ambiguity of the constitutional text permitted the parliamentary majority to sanction the President, whose self-proclaimed active role in the political system was supported by the Romanian Constitutional Court and by the citizens who participated in the referendum on his dismissal. CEU eTD Collection ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank Professor Nenad Dimitrijevic for the valuable guidance offered throughout the elaboration of the present paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania's Transition to Democracy
    RESEARCH PAPER No. 121 MAY 2008 ROMANIA’S TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY: PRESS’S ROLE IN INTELLIGENCE REFORM Florina Cristiana (Cris) Matei (Research Associate, Center for Civil-Military Relations (CCMR), Naval Postgraduate School (NPS), Monterey, CA, USA) RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN STUDIES (RIEAS) # 1, Kalavryton Street, Ano-Kalamaki, Athens, 17456, Greece RIEAS URL:http://www.rieas.gr 1 RIEAS MISSION STATEMENT Objective The objective of the Research Institute for European and American Studies (RIEAS) is to promote the understanding of international affairs. Special attention is devoted to transatlantic relations, intelligence studies and terrorism, European integration, international security, Balkan and Mediterranean studies, Russian foreign policy as well as policy making on national and international markets. Activities The Research Institute for European and American Studies seeks to achieve this objective through research, by publishing its research papers on international politics and intelligence studies, organizing seminars, as well as providing analyses via its web site. The Institute maintains a library and documentation center. RIEAS is an institute with an international focus. Young analysts, journalists, military personnel as well as academicians are frequently invited to give lectures and to take part in seminars. RIEAS maintains regular contact with other major research institutes throughout Europe and the United States and, together with similar institutes in Western Europe, Middle East, Russia and Southeast Asia. Status The Research Institute for European and American Studies is a non-profit research institute established under Greek law. RIEAS’s budget is generated by membership subscriptions, donations from individuals and foundations, as well as from various research projects. The Institute is autonomous organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology N.S. 3
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS STOCKHOLMIENSIS Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology N.S. 3 Call for Protection Situating Journalists in Post-Cold War Romania in a Global Media Development Discourse Urban Larssen ©Urban Larssen and Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis 2010 ISBN 978-91-86071-36-3 Printed in Sweden by US-AB, Stockholm 2010 Distributor: eddy.se ab, Visby Sweden Cover illustration by Dan Perjovschi For my parents and Cireşului Contents Acknowledgments ..................................................................................... 11 1. Introduction: Locating Public Sphere ............................................... 15 Journalism—a “global profession” ................................................................... 16 The safety of Romanian journalists—a global concern................................ 18 2004—a critical year .......................................................................................... 20 Foreign influence, ideal model and the crisis of journalism ....................... 22 Journalism and transnational public spheres ................................................ 26 A “softer” approach ........................................................................................... 32 The myth of the mediated center ................................................................... 34 Why Romania? .................................................................................................... 36 Notes on method, material, and sources ....................................................... 38 Overview
    [Show full text]
  • The Intelligence Phenomenon in a New Democratic Milieu. Romania—A Case Study
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE INTELLIGENCE PHENOMENON IN A NEW DEMOCRATIC MILIEU. ROMANIA—A CASE STUDY by Valentin Fernand Filip March 2006 Thesis Co-Advisors: Thomas Bruneau Kenneth Dombroski Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 2006 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: The Intelligence Phenomenon in a New Democratic 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Milieu. Romania–A Case Study 6. AUTHOR(S) Valentin Fernand Filip 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Florina Cristiana (Cris) Matei
    RESEARCH PAPER No. 110 JUNE 2007 SHAPING INTELLIGENCE AS A PROFESSION IN ROMANIA: REFORMING INTELLIGENCE EDUCATION AFTER 1989 Florina Cristiana (Cris) Matei (Research Associate, Center for Civil-Military Relations (CCMR), Naval Postgraduate School (NPS), Monterey, CA, USA) RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN STUDIES (RIEAS) # 1, Kalavryton Street, Ano-Kalamaki, Athens, 17456, Greece RIEAS URL:http://www.rieas.gr 1 RIEAS MISSION STATEMENT Objective The objective of the Research Institute for European and American Studies (RIEAS) is to promote the understanding of international affairs. Special attention is devoted to transatlantic relations, intelligence studies and terrorism, European integration, international security, Balkan and Mediterranean studies, Russian foreign policy as well as policy making on national and international markets. Activities The Research Institute for European and American Studies seeks to achieve this objective through research, by publishing its research papers on international politics and intelligence studies, organizing seminars, as well as providing analyses via its web site. The Institute maintains a library and documentation center. RIEAS is an institute with an international focus. Young analysts, journalists, military personnel as well as academicians are frequently invited to give lectures and to take part in seminars. RIEAS maintains regular contact with other major research institutes throughout Europe and the United States and, together with similar institutes in Western Europe, Middle East, Russia and Southeast Asia. Status The Research Institute for European and American Studies is a non-profit research institute established under Greek law. RIEAS’s budget is generated by membership subscriptions, donations from individuals and foundations, as well as from various research projects. The Institute is autonomous organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Intelligence Services During the Cold War: How Small Powers Can Sometimes Be Strong
    THE ROMANIAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICES DURING THE COLD WAR: HOW SMALL POWERS CAN SOMETIMES BE STRONG A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Security Studies By Rodica Eliza Gheorghe, B.A. Washington, DC April 16, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Rodica Eliza Gheorghe All Rights Reserved ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Literature Review ............................................................................................................. 4 A Methodology for Measuring Intelligence Effectiveness in International Politics ........ 7 Superpower Confrontation and Détente: Romania‟s Intelligence Effectiveness during the Cold War ................................................................................................................... 14 The Unipolar Moment: The Current Relevance of Studying the Role of Intelligence in International Politics ....................................................................................................... 50 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 59 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 64 iii INTRODUCTION Motto: “Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes” (Beware of Greeks
    [Show full text]
  • The Institution of Presidential Impeachmnet in Semi-Presidential Systems
    THE INSTITUTION OF PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT IN SEMI-PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEMS -CASE STUDY OF ROMANIA- By Valentina-Andreea Dimulescu Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Political Science Supervisor: Professor Nenad Dimitrijevic Budapest, Hungary 2009 i ABSTRACT The present paper examines the institution of presidential impeachment in countries displaying a semi-presidential institutional design. More specifically, it addresses the question whether the functioning of impeachment can be attributed to the particular institutional arrangement mirrored in the specific interactions between the state actors involved – the president, parliament and PM – or by non-institutional factors such as the president’s actions throughout his/her tenure which can be considered as having violated the constitutional text. The methodology used is the case study of the 2007 Romanian presidential impeachment against Traian Băsescu. The principal finding is that it is difficult to point to a clear, mono- causal relationship between the tensions caused by semi-presidentialism and the practice of impeachment since the impeachment of the head of state is not a common practice in countries that display semi-presidential features. The Romanian case represents a situation where the ambiguity of the constitutional text permitted the parliamentary majority to sanction the President, whose self-proclaimed active role in the political system was supported by the Romanian Constitutional Court and by the citizens who participated in the referendum on his dismissal. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank Professor Nenad Dimitrijevic for the valuable guidance offered throughout the elaboration of the present paper.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners 5.12.2006 NOTICE TO MEMBERS Subject: Report on the TDIP Committee delegation visit to Bucharest (Romania – 17-19 October 2006) Please find attached a report on the delegation visit to Bucharest prepared by the Secretariat under the responsibility of Mr Carlos Coelho, committee and delegation chairman. DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES CM\643712EN.doc PE 382.407v01-00 A. Procedure When it adopted its working programme for the second half of the year on 10 July 2006, the TDIP Temporary Committee decided to send a delegation to Romania. By letter of 13 July 2006 (310323/D(2006)39564) Mr Coelho, chairman of the TDIP Committee, asked Mr Borrell, President of the European Parliament, to seek the Bureau's approval for this visit. On 6 September 2006, the Bureau agreed to this request, authorising 10 committee members (chairman, rapporteur and one representative from each political group) to travel to Bucharest from Tuesday, 17 to Thursday, 19 October 2006. Delegation participants are listed in Annex 1 and the programme is detailed in Annex 2. B. Record of meetings Monday, 16 October 2006 18.30 – 20.00 Reception by the Finnish Ambassador, on behalf of the Council Presidency, to welcome the delegation When it arrived in the evening the delegation was welcomed by the Finnish Ambassador to Romania, Mr Tapio Saarela, and by the Head of the Commission Delegation in Romania, Mr Jonathan Scheele, as well as by several ambassadors from EU Member States.
    [Show full text]