Typologies Report on Laundering the Proceeds of Organised Crime Prems 105815

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Typologies Report on Laundering the Proceeds of Organised Crime Prems 105815 TYPOLOGIES REPORT ON LAUNDERING THE PROCEEDS OF ORGANISED CRIME PREMS 105815 ENG The Council of Europe is the continent’s MONEYVAL leading human rights organisation. It comprises 47 member states, 28 of which Committee of Experts are members of the European Union. on the Evaluation www.coe.int All Council of Europe member states have signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights, a treaty designed of Anti-Money Laundering to protect human rights, democracy and the rule of law. Measures and the Financing The European Court of Human Rights oversees of Terrorism the implementation of the Convention in the member states. COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE EVALUATION OF ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING MEASURES AND THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (MONEYVAL) MONEYVAL (2015)20 Typologies Report on Laundering the Proceeds of Organised Crime 17 April 2015 Ref. MONEYVAL(2015)20, dated 17 April 2015, adopted by MONEYVAL at its 47th plenary meeting (14-17 April 2015) MONEYVAL Typologies Report – April 2015 The Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism (MONEYVAL) is a monitoring body of the Council of Europe entrusted with the task of assessing compliance with the principal international standards to counter money laundering and the financing of terrorism and the effectiveness of their implementation, as well as with the task of making recommendations to national authorities in respect of necessary improvements to their systems. For more information on MONEYVAL, please visit our website: www.coe.int/moneyval © Council of Europe, 2015. All rights reserved. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. For any use for commercial purposes, no part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet, etc.) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without prior permission in writing from the MONEYVAL Secretariat. Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law, Council of Europe, F-67075 Strasbourg (fax: +33(0)3.88.41.30.17 or email: [email protected]) 2 MONEYVAL Typologies Report – April 2015 Contents List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 5 I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 6 II. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 11 II.1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 11 II.2 Background situation .......................................................................................................................... 12 II.3 Scope of the Paper ............................................................................................................................. 16 II.4 Objectives of the Study ...................................................................................................................... 17 III. Emerging findings from the survey .................................................................................................... 18 III.1 Principal findings ............................................................................................................................... 18 III.2 Challenges and vulnerabilities of organised crime generated ML cases........................................... 20 III.3 Recommendations............................................................................................................................. 25 III.4 Trends ................................................................................................................................................ 32 IV. Techniques for investigating and prosecuting the laundering of the proceeds of organised crime ..................................................................................................................................................... 35 IV.1 The risk assessment .......................................................................................................................... 35 IV.2 Detecting ML cases related to OC assets .......................................................................................... 37 IV.3 Analysing, investigating and prosecuting ML derived from OC activity ........................................... 40 IV.3.1 Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 40 IV.3.2 Financial investigations .................................................................................................................. 41 IV.3.3 Financial profiling ........................................................................................................................... 43 IV.3.4 Confiscation and reverse burden of proof ..................................................................................... 44 IV.3.5 Joint investigation teams (JITs) ...................................................................................................... 46 IV.3.6 Prosecution .................................................................................................................................... 47 IV.3.7 Other useful practices .................................................................................................................... 50 V. Obstacles and challenges .................................................................................................................... 53 V.1 Obstacles ............................................................................................................................................ 53 V.2 Organised crime infiltrating financial institutions .............................................................................. 54 VI. Typologies of laundering the proceeds of the OC ............................................................................. 57 3 MONEYVAL Typologies Report – April 2015 VI.1 General .............................................................................................................................................. 57 VI.2 Red flags and indicators .................................................................................................................... 61 VI.3 Complex transactions ........................................................................................................................ 62 VI.4 Obscure ownership of the funds and corporate vehicles ................................................................. 66 VI.5 Significant amounts involved in the transactions ............................................................................. 69 VI.6 Use of corporate vehicles acting in the legitimate economy ............................................................ 72 VI.7 Use of MBSs and exchange offices .................................................................................................... 75 VI.8 The use of professionals .................................................................................................................... 78 Annexes .................................................................................................................................................... 83 Annex 1. Cases involving organised crime groups, number of indictments and convictions .................. 83 Annex 2. Organised crime groups, number of indictments and convictions (persons) ........................... 84 Annex 3. Organised crime and money laundering asset seizures and freezing (value of assets in EURO) .................................................................................................................................................................. 85 Annex 4: Organised crime and money laundering asset confiscation (value of assets in Euro) .............. 87 Annex 5: ML investigations, prosecutions and convictions ..................................................................... 88 4 MONEYVAL Typologies Report – April 2015 List of Abbreviations AML/CFT Anti -Money Laundering/Combatting the Financing of Terrorism CDD Customer Due Diligence CETS Coun cil of Europe Treaty System CTR Cash transaction report DNFBP Designated Non-Financial Professions and Business EU European Union FIU Financial Intelligence Unit FATF Financial Action Task Force IMF International Monetary Fund JIT Joint Investigation Team LEA Law Enforcement Agencies Macau SAR Macau Special Administrative Region ML/TF Money Laundering/Terrorist Financing MONEYVAL Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures OC Organised Crime OCG Organised Crime Group RE Reporting Entity ST Suspicious Transaction STR Suspicious Transaction Report Warsaw Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Convention Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism 5 MONEYVAL Typologies Report – April 2015 I. Executive Summary 1. The project to examine the laundering methods used by organised crime (OC) was approved by the 41st MONEYVAL Plenary in April 2013. It was agreed that the project team should examine the methods used by organised criminal
Recommended publications
  • Money Laundering
    Money Laundering Alex Ferguson - Legal Adviser, Caribbean Criminal Asset Recovery Programme Objectives • History and background to money laundering; • The stages of money laundering; • Types of money laundering schemes; • Money Laundering Offences • Prosecutions types; • The predicate offences; • Current trends History The term money laundering is said to have its origins from the mafia’s ownership of Laundromats in the US in the 1920’s and 1930’s. Orgainised criminals were making so much money from extortion, prostitution, gambling and bootlegging, they needed to show a legitimate source of the money. One way in which they could do this was to purchase outwardly legitimate businesses and to mix their illicit earnings with the legitimate earnings from these businesses. Laundromats were chosen because they were cash businesses. Al Capone used this method in Chicago. Journalist Geoffrey Robinson regards the tale that money laundering came from this as a myth. He states: Money Laundering is called what it is because it perfectly describes what takes place – illegal or dirty money is put through a cycle of transactions, or washed, so that it comes out the other end as legal or clean money. In other words, the source of the illegally obtained funds is obscured through a succession of transfers and deals in order that those same funds can eventually be made to appear as legitimate income. Meyer Lansky Lansky was to become known as the Mobster’s accountant. He was determined that the same fate that came of Al Capone would not befall him and he set about finding ways to hide money. Through this determination he discovered the benefits of numbered Swiss bank accounts.
    [Show full text]
  • Money Laundering: an Overview of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and Related Federal Criminal Law
    Money Laundering: An Overview of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and Related Federal Criminal Law Charles Doyle Senior Specialist in American Public Law November 30, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33315 Money Laundering: An Overview of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and Related Federal Criminal Law Summary This report provides an overview of the elements of federal criminal money laundering statutes and the sanctions imposed for their violation. The most prominent is 18 U.S.C. § 1956. Section 1956 outlaws four kinds of money laundering—promotional, concealment, structuring, and tax evasion laundering of the proceeds generated by designated federal, state, and foreign underlying crimes (predicate offenses)—committed or attempted under one or more of three jurisdictional conditions (i.e., laundering involving certain financial transactions, laundering involving international transfers, and stings). Its companion, 18 U.S.C. § 1957, prohibits depositing or spending more than $10,000 of the proceeds from a predicate offense. Section 1956 violations are punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years. Section 1957 carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment for 10 years. Property involved in either case is subject to confiscation. Misconduct that implicates either offense may implicate other federal criminal statutes as well. Federal racketeer influenced and corrupt organization (RICO) provisions outlaw acquiring or conducting the affairs of an enterprise (whose activities affect interstate or foreign commerce) through the patterned commission of a series of underlying federal or state crimes. RICO violations are also 20-year felonies. The Section 1956 predicate offense list automatically includes every RICO predicate offense, including each “federal crime of terrorism.” A second related statute, the Travel Act (18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 a Manual for Federal Prosecutors
    Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 A Manual for Federal Prosecutors December 2006 Prepared by the Staff of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 514-3594 Frank J. Marine, Consultant Douglas E. Crow, Principal Deputy Chief Amy Chang Lee, Assistant Chief Robert C. Dalton Merv Hamburg Gregory C.J. Lisa Melissa Marquez-Oliver David J. Stander Catherine M. Weinstock Cover Design by Linda M. Baer PREFACE This manual is intended to assist federal prosecutors in the preparation and litigation of cases involving the Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1959. Prosecutors are encouraged to contact the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section (OCRS) early in the preparation of their case for advice and assistance. All pleadings alleging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959 including any indictment, information, or criminal complaint, and a prosecution memorandum must be submitted to OCRS for review and approval before being filed with the court. The submission should be approved by the prosecutor’s office before being submitted to OCRS. Due to the volume of submissions received by OCRS, prosecutors should submit the proposal three weeks prior to the date final approval is needed. Prosecutors should contact OCRS regarding the status of the proposed submission before finally scheduling arrests or other time-sensitive actions relating to the submission. Moreover, prosecutors should refrain from finalizing any guilty plea agreement containing a Section 1959 charge until final approval has been obtained from OCRS. The policies and procedures set forth in this manual and elsewhere relating to 18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT BITCHES and THIEVES: GULAG GUARDS, ADMINISTRATORS, and PROFESSIONAL CRIMINALS in the BITCHES' WAR by Adam Richard
    ABSTRACT BITCHES AND THIEVES: GULAG GUARDS, ADMINISTRATORS, AND PROFESSIONAL CRIMINALS IN THE BITCHES’ WAR by Adam Richard Rodger Amongst the professional criminals imprisoned in the Soviet Gulag, a split developed between those who kept to the Thieves’ Law and those who broke the Law and collaborated with the State. This violent schism, the Bitches’ War, raged across the entire Gulag system, becoming most heated between 1948 and 1953, and implicated the camps’ guards and administrators as much as the prisoners themselves. This research examines primary and secondary sources, heavily incorporating Gulag survivor memoirs, to investigate the culture of the Thieves-in-Law, these professional criminals, and also to uncover the involvement, intentions, and guilt of the camp administration. This study argues that the Bitches’ War sheds light on the real purpose and function of the Gulag; that it was not primarily about ideological re-education, nor was it primarily about economics and production, but that the Gulag served as a model for social control through use of power, persuasion, and violence. BITCHES AND THIEVES: GULAG GUARDS, ADMINISTRATORS, AND PROFESSIONAL CRIMINALS IN THE BITCHES’ WAR Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of Master’s Degree by Adam Richard Rodger Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2017 Advisor: Dr. Stephen Norris Reader: Dr. Dan Prior Reader: Dr. Scott Kenworthy ©2017 Adam Richard Rodger This thesis titled BITCHES AND THIEVES GULAG GUARDS, ADMINISTRATORS, AND PROFESSIONAL CRIMINALS IN THE BITCHES’ WAR by Adam Richard Rodger has been approved for publication by The College of Arts and Sciences and The Department of History ____________________________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia – Researched and Compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 6 September 2011
    Georgia – Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 6 September 2011 Information on the Georgian Mafia. An Institute for War and Peace Reporting article states: “A 2004 study entitled ‘Thieves in law in Georgia’ by well-known lawyers Givi Lobzhanidze and Giorgi Zhgenti outlined the extent of the power of the crime lords, estimating that around 30 per cent of revenues in Georgia's banking system, 40 per cent of income from hotels and restaurants, 60 per cent of the gambling business, 15 per cent of the energy sector, and 40 per cent in the construction industry are in the hands of mafia groups.” (Institute for War and Peace Reporting (27 January 2006) Georgia’s Resilient Mafia) See also Institute for War and Peace Reporting article which states: “On coming to power in 2004, Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili made a strong commitment to root out criminality and corruption in his country. The new campaign kicked off after the Georgian government included the term “thief in law” for the first time in new legislation targeting organised crime and racketeering. The new law defines a thief in law as “a member of the criminal world who follows the special laws of the criminal world and in some form runs and/or organises the activity of the criminal world or a certain group of people”. The concept of thief in law dates back to Soviet times, when several hundred criminal kingpins took pride in this appellation. A thief in law lived entirely outside the legal system of the country and earned no money from the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Money-Laundering Typologies: a Review of Their Fitness for Purpose
    1 MONEY-LAUNDERING TYPOLOGIES: A REVIEW OF THEIR FITNESS FOR PURPOSE MICHAEL LEVI, PHD, DSC (ECON.) PROFESSOR OF CRIMINOLOGY, CARDIFF UNIVERSITY, UK. GOVERNMENT OF CANADA CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER: 06002-12-0389 OCTOBER 31 2013 2 CONTENTS PART 1: DEFINING AND CONCEPTUALISING TYPOLOGIES ................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Conceptualising and defining laundering ............................................................................................ 4 The elastic definition of laundering ..................................................................................................... 6 Reference to the predicate crime ...................................................................................................... 9 Seriousness of the predicate crime ................................................................................................. 9 The three-stage model and typologies of money laundering .......................................................... 9 The Use of the Three Stage Typology in Policy and Practice ....................................................... 14 PART 2: LITERATURE REVIEW OF LAUNDERING TYPOLOGIES ............................................................. 16 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research Conferences on Organised Crime at the Bundeskriminalamt in Germany Conferences Research Research Conferences on Organised Crime 2013 – 2015
    Polizei+Forschung 48 Content Edited by Since 2008 the yearly research conferences in Germany focusing on organised crime have established a European-wide forum that enables international exchange bet- Ursula Töttel ween academics and practitioners from law enforcement agencies. The event is hos- ted each year by the Bundeskriminalamt together with its research partners of the Gergana Bulanova-Hristova “Research Network on Organised Crime” from the United Kingdom, Sweden and the Netherlands. To date, there have been participants from 23 European countries and the United States. The conferences have received financial support from the EU Gerhard Flach since 2010. This book entails summaries of the speeches hold on the conferences from 2013 until 2015 and contributions from the speakers on selected topics in the field of organised crime. Research Conferences on Organised Crime at the Zum Inhalt Die jährlichen Forschungskonferenzen in Deutschland zum Thema Organisierte Bundeskriminalamt Kriminalität haben in den Jahren von 2008 bis 2015 ein anerkanntes Forum für den internationalen Austausch zwischen Wissenschaftlern und Praktikern aus Straf- verfolgungsbehörden geschaffen. Die Tagungen wurden durch das BKA in Zusam- in Germany menarbeit mit den Partnern aus dem „Research Network on Organised Crime“ aus dem Vereinigten Königreich, Schweden und den Niederlanden ausgerichtet und seit 2010 von der EU unterstützt. Auf den Konferenzen waren Teilnehmer aus insgesamt Vol. III 23 europäischen Ländern und den USA vertreten. Dieser Sammelband enthält Zusammenfassungen der Einzelvorträge der OK-For- schungskonferenzen von 2013 bis 2015 sowie Beiträge der Redner zu ausgewählten Transnational Organised Crime Themen aus dem Bereich der Organisierten Kriminalität. 2013 – 2015 This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing
    ��������� ����������-����������� �������� �� ���������� ��� �������� �� ����� ���������� ��� ��������� ��������� �� ����� ���� ����� ����� �� ����� ������� CICTE Inter-American Committee against Terrorism 1 OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data Inter-American Committee against Terrorism. Technical Assessment - Comparative Analysis of typologies and patterns of money laundering and terrorism financing in three free trade zones in Latin America / [Prepared by the Inter-American Committee against Terrorism, Secretariat for Multidimensional Security, Organization of American States]. v. ; cm. (OAS. Official documents ; OEA/Ser.L/X.6.1). ISBN 978-0-8270-6652-6 1. Money laundering--Latin America--Case studies. 2. Terrorism--Finance--Latin America--Case studies. I. Title. II. Organization of American States. Secretariat for Multidimensional Security. III. Series. OEA/Ser.L/X.6.1 2 Technical Assessment-Comparative Analysis of Typologies and Patterns of Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing in Three Free Trade Zones in Latin America 3 4 The CICTE Secretariat would like to express its gratitude for the valuable support provided by the experts and participants who contributed to the development of this project. 5 6 Table of contents CHAPTER I. PRELIMINARY MATTERS Introduction Background Objectives Methodology CHAPTER II. GENERAL CONCEPTS AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK Money laundering and terrorism financing The crime of terrorism financing. International legislative history The 40 FATF Recommendations and the financing of terrorism Criminalization of terrorism financing Model definitions of the crime of money laundering and terrorism financing in the region CHAPTER III. FREE TRADE ZONES What is a free trade zone? Free trade zones in Latin America Most commonly-used types of transactions in TBML Threats Threats, by region I.NORTH AMERICAN, CENTRAL AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN SUB-REGION II.SOUTHERN CONE SUB-REGION III.ANDEAN SUB-REGION Vulnerabilities of free trade zones Vulnerabilities detected in the region CHAPTER IV.
    [Show full text]
  • FRAMVÄXTEN AV OCH KÄNNETECKEN HOS DEN ORGANISERADE BROTTSLIGHETEN I SVERIGE Lars Korsell Och Daniel Vesterhav
    FRAMVÄXTEN AV OCH KÄNNETECKEN HOS DEN ORGANISERADE BROTTSLIGHETEN I SVERIGE Lars Korsell och Daniel Vesterhav Sammanfattning Organiserad brottslighet är ett fenomen som inte är helt lätt att mäta i siffror. Det är närmast omöjligt att få fram statistis- ka uppgifter om brottsligheten och dess utveckling. Delvis be- ror det på avsaknaden av en enhetlig definition av organiserad brottslighet, men även om man utgår från exempelvis eu:s defi- nition (eu 1997) – att ett brott bland annat har begåtts av fler än två personer, att dessa samarbetat under längre tid och att det föreligger en viss arbetsdelning – är det inte möjligt att få fram siffror med någon slags statistisk trovärdighet. Den organiserade brottsligheten förknippas ofta med gäng. De synliga gängen, som i detta fördjupningsavsnitt benämns bro- derskap, utgör endast en del av organiserad brottslighet i Sveri- ge. En stor del av den kriminella affärsverksamheten utförs sna- rare av löst sammansatta och flexibla projektorganisationer, så kallade ad hoc-grupperingar. Huvudnäringen är att tillgodose marknadens efterfrågan på illegala – eller billiga – tjänster och varor. Den organiserade brottslighetens utveckling i Sverige går emel- lertid att beskriva kvalitativt utifrån den forskning som bedrivits på området, inte minst av Brå. Även om organiserad brottslighet Framväxten av och känntetecken hos den organiserade brottsligheten i Sverige fått ett stort genomslag i kriminalpolitik och medie bevakning · de senaste tjugo åren är det knappast något nytt fenomen. En tidig form är sjöröveri. Ett annat klassiskt inslag inom organi- serad brottslighet är smuggling även om smuggelgodset genom seklerna bytt skepnad många gånger om. I dag handlar det om narkotika, dopningspreparat, cigaretter och vapen.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Organized Crime: Recent Trends in the Baltic Sea Region
    Russian Organized Crime: Recent Trends in the Baltic Sea Region Edited by Walter Kegö & Alexandru Molcean Stockholm Paper February 2012 Russian Organized Crime: Recent Trends in the Baltic Sea Region Edited by Walter Kegö & Alexandru Molcean Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.isdp.eu Russian Organized Crime: Recent Trends in the Baltic Sea Region is published by the Institute for Security and Development Policy. The Institute is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and cooperates closely with research centers worldwide. Through its Silk Road Studies Program, the Institute runs a joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center with the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute of Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies. The Institute is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. It is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development. Through its applied research, publications, research coopera- tion, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion. The opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute for Security and Development Policy or its sponsors. © Institute for Security and Development Policy, 2012 ISBN: 978-91-86635-27-5 Printed in Singapore Distributed in Europe by: Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden Tel. +46-841056953; Fax. +46-86403370 Email: [email protected] Distributed in North America by: The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Paul H.
    [Show full text]
  • Primer on RICO Offenses (2021)
    Primer RICO Offenses (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Prepared by the Organizations) Office of the General Counsel DISCLAIMER The Commission’s legal staff publishes this document to assist in understanding and applying the sentencing guidelines. The information in this document should not be considered definitive or comprehensive. In addition, the information in this document does not necessarily represent the official position of the Commission on any particular issue or case, and it is not binding on the Commission, the courts, or the parties in any case. To the extent this document includes unpublished cases, practitioners should be cognizant of Fed. R. App. P. 32.1, as well as any corresponding rules in their jurisdictions. Want to learn more about relevant statutes, case law, and guidelines on a specific topic? The Commission’s legal staff offers a series of primers to assist in understanding and applying the sentencing guidelines on the following topics— Aggravating and Mitigating Role Adjustments Firearms Offenses Antitrust Offenses Immigration Offenses Categorical Approach Intellectual Property Offenses Offenses Involving Commercial Sex Acts and Loss Calculation under §2B1.1 Sexual Exploitation of Minors Relevant Conduct Computer Crimes Retroactivity Crime Victims' Rights RICO Offenses Criminal History Selected Offenses Against the Departures and Variances Person and VICAR Drug Offenses Sexual Abuse and Failure to Register Offenses Economic Crime Victims Supervised Release Fines for Organizations Learn more at https://www.ussc.gov/guidelines/primers. UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION One Columbus Circle, N.E. Suite 2-500, South Lobby Washington, DC 20002-8002 T: (202) 502-4500 F: (202) 502-4699 www.ussc.gov ║ @theusscgov This document was produced and published at U.S.
    [Show full text]