DOCSLIB.ORG

May 2021 Fly-Out Cancelled

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
May 2021 Fly-Out Cancelled The SPACE COAST AVIATOR May 2021 Fly-out Cancelled Airshow Ticket Giveaway Free tickets to members for the Great Florida Airshow Again, this year MAPA has purchased eight pair of tickets, four pair per day. Here is all you have to do for the ticket drawing. Email your name, home address, and phone number to [email protected] . Please indicate which day you would like to attend. The deadline for entering the contest is Friday, May 7 and the drawing will be Saturday, May 8. Tickets will be email to the winners on Sunday, May 9. Featured performers include the US Navy Blue Angels, an F-16 Viper Demo, the EA-18G Growler, Mike Wiskus, Rob Holland, Mike Goulian, Larry Labiola L-39 and the Quicksilver P-51. For show times and important information, check Frequently Asked Questions on the air show web site. https://www.greatfloridaairshow.com/ ✈ Aerion in the News Eyeing a 50-passenger jetliner Aerion Supersonic recently announced plans to construct a 50-passenger jetliner capable of Mach 4 with the first flight before the end of this decade. The aerospace company has the backing of American billionaire Robert M. Bass a businessman and philanthropist. Bass founded Aerion Supersonic nearly two decades ago and served as Chairman of the board until February 5, 2019 when Tom Vice former president of Northrop Grumman's Aerospace Systems took the reigns as CEO. The planned Mach 4 commercial jetliner, the AS3, would fly farther than their private business jet, the AS2, with a goal of reaching Tokyo from Los Angeles in three hours. In a recent emailed statement, Aerion said that despite the uncertain outcome of Aerion’s efforts to bring a viable plane to market, the company promised technology “to improve efficiency and reduce the environmental impact of supersonic flight.” Still planning their headquarters relocation from Reno, Nevada, to the Aerion Park campus at Melbourne Int’l Airport, their main competition is Boom Technology, another startup company that has a Mach 2.2, 50-passenger jet in R&D, called the Boom Overture. Both plane-makers are grappling with the same problems that caused the demise of the Concorde in 2003: huge fuel burn and its rising cost, sonic booms and loud engines that resulted in a ban on civilian supersonic flight over most countries. Aerion is working with GE Aviation, the aerospace division of General Electric, to design a new engine, and won backing from the Boeing Company two years ago. The AS2, Aerion’s the business jet is scheduled to fly in 2027. It got a boost last month with a 20-aircraft order from NetJets, the largest luxury-aircraft operator and part of the Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hanaway Inc empire. ✈ Aerion Drone Pilots Recurrent Testing Available Online Drone pilots who already have part 107 Remote Pilot Certification can now take their required recency of knowledge training courses online. The training ensures that they have the updated knowledge necessary to operate in accordance with the Operations over People rule, which became effective on April 21, 2021. The training is free and available on FAASafety.gov. Be sure to follow the “Training Credit” instructions in the Introduction or Review sections of these courses, before you begin, to receive the appropriate credit. Here are the courses: Part 107 Small UAS Recurrent Non-Part 61 Pilots (ALC-677) — All individuals who hold a part 107 remote pilot certificate are eligible to take this course. If you don’t hold any other pilot certificates other than part 107, this is likely the course you need to take. http://bit.ly/ALC-677 Part 107 Small UAS Initial (ALC-451) — Only part 107 remote pilots who are also certificated and current under part 61 are eligible to take this course. http://bit.ly/ALC451 Part 107 Small UAS Recurrent (ALC -515) — Only part 107 remote pilots who are also certificated and current under part 61 are eligible to take this course. http://bit.ly/ALC515 UAS Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test — If you do not hold a current Remote Pilot Certificate and want to operate under part 107, you must take this test through an FAA-Approved Knowledge Testing Center (https://faa.psiexams.com). Please note that there is a fee associated with this test. Part 61 pilots who do not have a current flight review (per 14 CFR 61.56) and wish to operate under Part 107 are required to take this test as well. Completing any of the online courses or passing the UAS Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test will provide 24 calendar months of currency. A calendar month includes all days within that month. For example, completing the Part 107 Small UAS Recurrent Non-Part 61 Pilots (ALC-677) course on April 6, 2021, will permit a remote pilot to fly under part 107 through April 30, 2023. For more information, go to www.faa.gov/uas or see the FAA news release here: https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=97201 Mooney Summit VIII Tampa FSDO FAA Safety Team The annual Mooney Summit VIII a safety related retreat, now rescheduled for Oct 22-24, 2021 at Peter O. Knight airport in Tampa (KTPF) and the Barrymore hotel. Friday - Noon - 3:00 PM – Roundtable discussions. Subject matter experts will host rotating roundtable discussions. A bell will chime every 30 minutes (totaling six sessions and over a dozen live table) where people move to another table. Tentative Roundtable Topics Maintenance Technology in the cockpit Airport Advocacy Aeromedical Factors Tampa Airport authority Meet the FAA So you want to be a Pro Pilot IFR and ForeFlight training Aviation Weather The Mooney Summit welcomes all pilots of all makes of planes! To learn more please visit the Mooney Summit website: mooneysummit.com Mooney Summit VIII Flyer FPM/Inspector Andrew Crossman - [email protected] - 813-508-6778 Tampa FAAST Lead Representative Mike Elliott - [email protected] 2 New Course Helps Pilots Conduct Preflight Self-Briefings Designed for Students, VFR pilots and it won’t hurt Rusty Pilots A new Wings credit course developed by Flight Service and available on FAASafety.gov provides students and VFR pilot guidance on how to conduct a safe and regulatory compliant preflight self-briefing, using automated weather resources. The objective of the course is to ensure that the pilot understands aviation weather basics and learns to apply meteorological and aeronautical information in a systematic manner to plan a safe flight. The course includes scenarios, real-life examples, videos, reference materials, and practice exercises for pilots to conduct on their own or with their flight instructor. Access the WINGS credit course here: http://bit.ly/ALC683. ✈ Amateur-Built Certification Aviation Maintenance Safety Minute Video Have you ever considered building your own airplane? In this brief video, David Hays, FAASTeam Program Manager, defines the regs and documentation required for amateur-built aircraft. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUnkCtEHaBo&list=PL5vHkqHi51DS-zCdCFOUyVzUgYlF_0qXK ✈ UAS Testing Changes Update Want to learn more about the airman knowledge testing changes for a remote pilot certificate with a small aircraft rating? Click on the FAA’s latest UAS testing changes document here: https://www.faa.gov/training_testing/testing/media/uas_testing_information.pdf ✈ Getting Around on the Ground Uh Oh missed the turn Have you ever wondered if you can tap or click your way out of trouble while taxiing on the ground? Well, it is not quite that easy, but in the article “Safe and Sound on the Ground,” editor James Williams explores how Electronic Flight Bags and EFB apps can greatly improve your situational awareness and help prevent surface safety incidents. Tools like geo-referenced charts and airport diagrams, improved flight planning, and even synthetic vision systems can add tremendous safety benefits at very limited costs. Check it out https://medium.com/faa/safe-and-sound-on-the-ground- 6e1977dee68f ✈ Meet the FAA’s Runway Safety Professionals Surface Safety Done Right At the FAA, runway safety spans several different domains. That’s why the agency takes on a collaborative approach in this area to ensure all the key players have a say in the decision process. And it’s because of these collaborative discussions among different areas of the FAA — and with airmen like you — that we’re able to realize many new safety-enhancing solutions at airports across the nation. Check out the article “Surface Safety Done Right” Be sure to check out the entire surface-safety-themed issue at www.faa.gov/news/safety_briefing. ✈ 3 Aviation History for May The Cold War Spy Game May 1, 1960. A CIA Lockheed U-2C (Article 360, 56-6693), flown by Francis Gary Powers from Peshawar Pakistan, was shot down by an SA-2 Guideline missile, near Sverdlovsk, USSR. The first of three missiles fired at Powers shot the U-2 down. The second or third SA-2 brought down Soviet MiG-19 pilot, Sergei Safronov, who died. Powers parachuted to safety. Taken captive and tried as a spy in a Soviet court. On February 10, 1962, in exchange for Soviet, spy Rudolf Abel; he was released, on the Glienicker Bridge in Berlin. May 6, 1954. One of a flight of six CAT C-119 Flying Boxcars, flown by CIA pilots James B. Earthquake McGoon McGovern and Wallace A. Buford was hit by ground fire as it was about to drop ammunition to beleaguered French Foreign Legion troops at Diên Biên Phu, Vietnam. The plane staggered 75 miles into Laos and crashed near the Nam Het River. Besides the pilots, were four French servicemen, Bataille, Rescouriou, Moussa and Jean Arlaux. Moussa and Jean Arlaux survived the crash, but Moussa died of his injuries several days later.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Community Outreach
    Truckee Tahoe Airport District COMMUNITY OUTREACH Neighborhood Meetings October 2016 Draft Acknowledgements We wish to thank our supportive community who provided their insight and thoughtful feedback. TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT DISTRICT BOARD AIRPORT COMMUNITY ADVISORY TEAM Lisa Wallace, President Kathryn Rohlf, Community Member/Chair James W. Morrison, Vice President Joe Polverari, Pilot Member/Vice Chair Mary Hetherington Christopher Gage, Pilot Member John B. Jones, Jr. Leigh Golden, Pilot Member J. Thomas Van Berkem Kent Hoopingarner, Community Member/Treasurer Lisa Krueger, Community Member AIRPORT STAFF Kevin Smith, General Manager BRIDGENET INTERNATIONAL Hardy Bullock, Director of Aviation Cindy Gibbs, Airspace Study Project Manager and Community Services Marc R. Lamb, Aviation and FRESHTRACKS COMMUNICATIONS Community Services Manager Seana Doherty, Owner/Founder Michael Cooke, Aviation and Phebe Bell, Facilitator Community Services Manager Amanda Wiebush, Associate Jill McClendon, Aviation and Community Greyson Howard,Mead &Associate Hunt, Inc. M & H Architecture, Inc. Services Program Coordinator 133 Aviation Boulevard, Suite 100 Lauren C. Tapia, District Clerk MEAD & HUNT,Santa INC. Rosa, California 95403 Mitchell Hooper,707-526-5010 West Coast Aviation meadhunt.com Planning Manager Brad Musinski, Aviation Planner Maranda Thompson, Aviation Planner TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND PROGRAM DESIGN .............................................. 1 2 NEIGHBORHOOD FEEDBACK ..................................................................... 5 APPENDICES A. Meeting Materials B. Public Comments C. Advertising and Marketing Efforts Introduction and ProgramMead & Hunt, Inc. Design M & H Architecture, Inc. 133 Aviation Boulevard, Suite 100 Santa Rosa, California 95403 707-526-5010 meadhunt.com INTRODUCTION Purpose The Truckee Tahoe Airport District (TTAD) understands that community input is incredibly valuable in developing good policies and making sound decisions about Truckee Tahoe Airport (TRK).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    USCA Case #11-1018 Document #1351383 Filed: 01/06/2012 Page 1 of 12 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 8, 2011 Decided January 6, 2012 No. 11-1018 REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC., PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Transportation Christopher T. Handman argued the cause for the petitioner. Robert E. Cohn, Patrick R. Rizzi and Dominic F. Perella were on brief. Timothy H. Goodman, Senior Trial Attorney, United States Department of Transportation, argued the cause for the respondent. Robert B. Nicholson and Finnuala K. Tessier, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, Paul M. Geier, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation, and Peter J. Plocki, Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Litigation, were on brief. Joy Park, Trial Attorney, United States Department of Transportation, entered an appearance. USCA Case #11-1018 Document #1351383 Filed: 01/06/2012 Page 2 of 12 2 Before: HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, and WILLIAMS and RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Republic Airline Inc. (Republic) challenges an order of the Department of Transportation (DOT) withdrawing two Republic “slot exemptions” at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (Reagan National) and reallocating those exemptions to Sun Country Airlines (Sun Country). In both an informal letter to Republic dated November 25, 2009 and its final order, DOT held that Republic’s parent company, Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. (Republic Holdings), engaged in an impermissible slot-exemption transfer with Midwest Airlines, Inc. (Midwest).
    [Show full text]
  • July/August 2000 Volume 26, No
    Irfc/I0 vfa£ /1 \ 4* Limited Edition Collectables/Role Model Calendars at home or in the office - these photo montages make a statement about who we are and what we can be... 2000 1999 Cmdr. Patricia L. Beckman Willa Brown Marcia Buckingham Jerrie Cobb Lt. Col. Eileen M. Collins Amelia Earhart Wally Funk julie Mikula Maj. lacquelyn S. Parker Harriet Quimby Bobbi Trout Captain Emily Howell Warner Lt. Col. Betty Jane Williams, Ret. 2000 Barbara McConnell Barrett Colonel Eileen M. Collins Jacqueline "lackie" Cochran Vicky Doering Anne Morrow Lindbergh Elizabeth Matarese Col. Sally D. Woolfolk Murphy Terry London Rinehart Jacqueline L. “lacque" Smith Patty Wagstaff Florene Miller Watson Fay Cillis Wells While They Last! Ship to: QUANTITY Name _ Women in Aviation 1999 ($12.50 each) ___________ Address Women in Aviation 2000 $12.50 each) ___________ Tax (CA Residents add 8.25%) ___________ Shipping/Handling ($4 each) ___________ City ________________________________________________ T O TA L ___________ S ta te ___________________________________________ Zip Make Checks Payable to: Aviation Archives Phone _______________________________Email_______ 2464 El Camino Real, #99, Santa Clara, CA 95051 [email protected] INTERNATIONAL WOMEN PILOTS (ISSN 0273-608X) 99 NEWS INTERNATIONAL Published by THE NINETV-NINES* INC. International Organization of Women Pilots A Delaware Nonprofit Corporation Organized November 2, 1929 WOMEN PILOTS INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS Box 965, 7100 Terminal Drive OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OFTHE NINETY-NINES® INC. Oklahoma City,
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Connected.Xlsx
    Sacramento International Airport Passenger Statistics July 2020 CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR % +/(-) 2020/21 2019/20 % +/(-) 2020 2019 % +/(-) Enplaned Domestic Alaska Airlines 3,593 33,186 (89.2%) 3,593 33,186 (89.2%) 54,432 173,858 (68.7%) Horizon Air 6,120 14,826 (58.7%) 6,120 14,826 (58.7%) 31,298 75,723 (58.7%) American Airlines 28,089 54,512 (48.5%) 28,089 54,512 (48.5%) 162,319 348,689 (53.4%) Boutique 79 95 (16.8%) 79 95 (16.8%) 613 201 205.0% Contour - 721 (100.0%) - 721 (100.0%) 4,461 2,528 76.5% Delta Airlines 14,185 45,962 (69.1%) 14,185 45,962 (69.1%) 111,063 233,946 (52.5%) Frontier 4,768 7,107 (32.9%) 4,768 7,107 (32.9%) 25,423 38,194 (33.4%) Hawaiian Airlines 531 10,660 (95.0%) 531 10,660 (95.0%) 26,393 64,786 (59.3%) Jet Blue - 16,858 (100.0%) - 16,858 (100.0%) 25,168 85,877 (70.7%) Southwest 112,869 300,716 (62.5%) 112,869 300,716 (62.5%) 899,647 1,963,253 (54.2%) Spirit 8,425 11,318 (25.6%) 8,425 11,318 (25.6%) 38,294 15,526 146.6% Sun Country 886 1,650 (46.3%) 886 1,650 (46.3%) 1,945 4,401 (55.8%) United Airlines 7,620 46,405 (83.6%) 7,620 46,405 (83.6%) 98,028 281,911 (65.2%) 187,165 544,016 (65.6%) 187,165 544,016 (65.6%) 1,479,084 3,288,893 (55.0%) Commuters Alaska/Skywest - 4,304 (100.0%) - 4,304 (100.0%) 36,457 50,776 (28.2%) American/Skywest/Compass/Mesa - 8,198 (100.0%) - 8,198 (100.0%) 18,030 45,781 (60.6%) Delta/Skywest/Compass 5,168 23,651 (78.1%) 5,168 23,651 (78.1%) 62,894 146,422 (57.0%) United/Skywest/GoJet/Republic 4,040 16,221 (75.1%) 4,040 16,221 (75.1%)
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Trends
    9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 15 1 M Overview and Trends The Transportation Research Board (TRB) study committee that pro- duced Winds of Change held its final meeting in the spring of 1991. The committee had reviewed the general experience of the U.S. airline in- dustry during the more than a dozen years since legislation ended gov- ernment economic regulation of entry, pricing, and ticket distribution in the domestic market.1 The committee examined issues ranging from passenger fares and service in small communities to aviation safety and the federal government’s performance in accommodating the escalating demands on air traffic control. At the time, it was still being debated whether airline deregulation was favorable to consumers. Once viewed as contrary to the public interest,2 the vigorous airline competition 1 The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 was preceded by market-oriented administra- tive reforms adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) beginning in 1975. 2 Congress adopted the public utility form of regulation for the airline industry when it created CAB, partly out of concern that the small scale of the industry and number of willing entrants would lead to excessive competition and capacity, ultimately having neg- ative effects on service and perhaps leading to monopolies and having adverse effects on consumers in the end (Levine 1965; Meyer et al. 1959). 15 9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 16 16 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY spurred by deregulation now is commonly credited with generating large and lasting public benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999
    9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 171 Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999 UNFAIR PRICING AND CAPACITY RESPONSES 1. Date Raised: May 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Northwest Airlines Description: AccessAir, a new airline headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, began service in the New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles to Mo- line/Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois, markets. Northwest offers connecting service in these markets. AccessAir alleged that Northwest was offering fares in these markets that were substantially below Northwest’s costs. 171 9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 172 172 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY 2. Date Raised: March 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Delta, Northwest, and TWA Description: AccessAir was a new entrant air carrier, headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. In February 1999, AccessAir began service to New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles from Des Moines, Iowa, and Moline/ Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois. AccessAir offered direct service (nonstop or single-plane) between these points, while competitors generally offered connecting service. In the Des Moines/Moline–Los Angeles market, Ac- cessAir offered an introductory roundtrip fare of $198 during the first month of operation and then planned to raise the fare to $298 after March 5, 1999. AccessAir pointed out that its lowest fare of $298 was substantially below the major airlines’ normal 14- to 21-day advance pur- chase fares of $380 to $480 per roundtrip and was less than half of the major airlines’ normal 7-day advance purchase fare of $680.
    [Show full text]
  • Air America in South Vietnam I – from the Days of CAT to 1969
    Air America in South Vietnam I From the days of CAT to 1969 by Dr. Joe F. Leeker First published on 11 August 2008, last updated on 24 August 2015 I) At the times of CAT Since early 1951, a CAT C-47, mostly flown by James B. McGovern, was permanently based at Saigon1 to transport supplies within Vietnam for the US Special Technical and Economic Mission, and during the early fifties, American military and economic assistance to Indochina even increased. “In the fall of 1951, CAT did obtain a contract to fly in support of the Economic Aid Mission in FIC [= French Indochina]. McGovern was assigned to this duty from September 1951 to April 1953. He flew a C-47 (B-813 in the beginning) throughout FIC: Saigon, Hanoi, Phnom Penh, Vientiane, Nhatrang, Haiphong, etc., averaging about 75 hours a month. This was almost entirely overt flying.”2 CAT’s next operations in Vietnam were Squaw I and Squaw II, the missions flown out of Hanoi in support of the French garrison at Dien Bien Phu in 1953/4, using USAF C-119s painted in the colors of the French Air Force; but they are described in the file “Working in Remote Countries: CAT in New Zealand, Thailand-Burma, French Indochina, Guatemala, and Indonesia”. Between mid-May and mid-August 54, the CAT C-119s continued dropping supplies to isolated French outposts and landed loads throughout Vietnam. When the Communists incited riots throughout the country, CAT flew ammunition and other supplies from Hanoi to Saigon, and brought in tear gas from Okinawa in August.3 Between 12 and 14 June 54, CAT captain
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2
    DCCD Doc No. 28 28/4/09 (English only) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2 May 2009) CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AIRCRAFT TO THIRD PARTIES AND CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE TO THIRD PARTIES, RESULTING FROM ACTS OF UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE INVOLVING AIRCRAFT (Presented by the Air Crash Victims Families Group) 1. INTRODUCTION – SUPPLEMENTAL AND OTHER COMPENSATIONS 1.1 The apocalyptic terrorist attack by the means of four hi-jacked planes committed against the World Trade Center in New York, NY , the Pentagon in Arlington, VA and the aborted flight ending in a crash in the rural area in Shankville, PA ON September 11th, 2001 is the only real time example that triggered this proposed Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft. 1.2 It is therefore important to look towards the post incident resolution of this tragedy in order to adequately and pro actively complete ONE new General Risk Convention (including compensation for ALL catastrophic damages) for the twenty first century. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Immediately after September 11th, 2001 – the Government and Congress met with all affected and interested parties resulting in the “Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act” (Public Law 107-42-Sept. 22,2001). 2.2 This Law provided the basis for Rules and Regulations for: a) Airline Stabilization; b) Aviation Insurance; c) Tax Provisions; d) Victims Compensation; and e) Air Transportation Safety. DCCD Doc No. 28 - 2 - 2.3 The Airline Stabilization Act created the legislative vehicle needed to reimburse the air transport industry for their losses of income as a result of the flight interruption due to the 911 attack.
    [Show full text]
  • TED STEVENS ANCHORAGE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Anchorage, Alaska
    TED STEVENS ANCHORAGE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Anchorage, Alaska PFC Quarterly Report - Receipts Collected For the Quarter Ended March 31,2009 (Application No. 1 ) Application #99-01-C-00-ANC & 99-01-C-01-ANC $22,000,000.00 0.00 Total Collection Authority $22,000,000.00 PFC Revenue Received Air Carriers Current Quarter Previous Quarters Cumulative Aces Airlines 32.12 32.12 Aer Lingus 317.44 317.44 Aerovias De Mexico 122.58 122.58 Aero Mexico 98.53 98.53 Air Canada 136,476.21 136,476.21 Air France 1,764.99 1,764.99 Air New Zealand 2,094.33 2,094.33 Air Pacific 8.67 8.67 Airlines Services Corporation 37.96 37.96 Air Wisconsin Airlines 46.54 46.54 Alaska Airlines 11,024,874.06 11,024,874.06 Alitalia Airlines 1,051.51 1,051.51 All Nippon Airways Co 1,905.64 1,905.64 Aloha Airlines 7,152.82 7,152.82 America Central Corp 23.36 23.36 America West Airlines 228,474.04 228,474.04 American Airlines 509,508.22 509,508.22 American Trans Air 6,513.14 6,513.14 Asiana Airlines 2,125.95 2,125.95 Atlantic Coast Airline 96.36 96.36 Avianca 8.76 8.76 Big Sky Airlines 87.36 87.36 British Airways 12,272.36 12,272.36 Canada 3000 10,999.72 10,999.72 Cathay Pacific Airways 271.27 271.27 China Airlines 78,473.09 78,473.09 Condor Flugdienst, GMBH 63,889.95 63,889.95 Continental Airlines 1,380,859.31 1,380,859.31 Czech Airlines 348.36 348.36 Delta Airlines 1,673,182.33 1,673,182.33 Elal Israel Airlines 110.74 110.74 Emirates 14.57 14.57 Era Aviation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet National Security Decision Making Kurt M
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Political Science Faculty Publications Political Science 1990 Soviet National Security Decision Making Kurt M. Campbell Jeffrey W. Legro University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/polisci-faculty-publications Part of the Political Theory Commons Recommended Citation Campbell, Kurt, and Jeffrey W. Legro. "Soviet National Security Decision Making." In A Primer for the Nuclear Age, edited by Graham T. Allison, Jr., et. al., 107-116. Lanham: University Press of America, 1990. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chapter 12 SOVIET NATIONAL SECURITY DECISION­ MAKING by Kurt Campbell and Jeffrey W. Legro Winston Churchill's characterization of the Soviet Un­ ion as a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma may overstate Western understanding of the USSR's national security decision-making. The evidence in this domain is sparse, and what we do have is incomplete. Indeed, the Soviets have taken extraordinary steps to maintain the black box that shields how and why their decisions are made. With these caveats in mind, knowl­ edge of Soviet decision-making can be summed up in a few general statements. First, the Soviet leadership is an integrated political-military body, where political au­ thority is dominant, but where the professional military retains an important influence. Second, the role of institutions and individuals varies within and between leaderships, according to the issue under consideration (e.g., doctrine, procurement, etc.), and between times of peace and war.
    [Show full text]
  • Actions Needed to Improve Airline Customer Service and Minimize Long, On-Board Delays
    Before the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Aviation United States House of Representatives For Release on Delivery Expected at 2:00 p.m. EDT Actions Needed To Wednesday September 26, 2007 Improve Airline CC-2007-099 Customer Service and Minimize Long, On-Board Delays Statement of The Honorable Calvin L. Scovel III Inspector General U.S. Department of Transportation Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee: We are pleased to be here today to discuss airline customer service issues and the actions needed from the Department of Transportation (DOT), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), airlines, and airports to minimize long, on-board delays. This hearing is both timely and important given the record-breaking flight delays, cancellations, diversions, and on-board tarmac delays that air travelers have already experienced this year. Based on the first 7 months of the year: • Nearly 28 percent of flights were delayed, cancelled, or diverted—with airlines’ on-time performance at the lowest percentage (72 percent) recorded in the last 10 years. • Not only are there more delays, but also longer delay periods. Of those flights arriving late, passengers experienced a record-breaking average flight arrival delay of 57 minutes, up nearly 3 minutes from 2006. • More than 54,000 flights affecting nearly 3.7 million passengers experienced taxi-in and taxi-out times of 1 to 5 hours or more. This is an increase of nearly 42 percent as compared to the same period in 2006. As you know, Secretary Peters has expressed serious concerns about the airlines’ treatment of passengers during extended ground delays.
    [Show full text]
  • CIA Air Operations in Laos, 1955
    Supporting the SecretWar CIAAirOperations in Laos,1955-1974 William M. Leary Thelargestparamilitaryoperations successfulphotoreconnaissance pro everundertaken by the CIAtook gram, and engaged in numerous place in the smallSoutheastAsian clandestinemissionst~singnight- Kingdom ofLaos. For morethan 13 visiongiasses and state-of-the-art years, the Agencydirectednative electron,icequipment.Without Air forces that foughtmajorNorthViet Americaspresence, the CIAseffort nameseunits to a standstill. in Laoscould not hav~been Although the countryeventually fell sustained. to the Communists, the CIA remainedproud of its accomplish ments in Laos. As Director of A DistortedView CentralIntelligence(DCI)Richard Air America, Helms laterobserved:This was a for the It AirAmericas has fared an airlinesecretly majoroperation Agency... publicimage tookmanpower; it tookspecially poorly. The 1990movieAirAmer owned by theCIA, qualifiedmanpower; it was danger ica is largelyresponsib~e for this. It difficult. The he was a vital ous; it was CIA, featured, a cynical CIA~officerwho contended, did a superbjob. arranged for the airline to fly opium component in to the ac~lministrativecapital of Vien the tiane for a corrupt general Agencys AirAmerica, an airlinesecretly Asi~n looselymodeled on VangPao, a mili operations owned by the CIA, was a vitalcom taryleader of the mountain-region- ponent in the Agencysoperations in in Laos. basedH,mongethnicgroup. The Laos. By the summer of 1970, the film depicts the CIA as having airlinehad some two dozentwin- r~ian the opiI~mprocessed intoheroin in a 9 enginetransports,another two dozen down the from the short-takeoff-and-landing(STOL) factoryjust ~treet favorite ,bar ofAir pilots. aircraft, andsome 30 helicoptersded Americas TheAsiangeneral, in return, sup icated to operations in Laos. There pliedm~n to fight the war, plus a weremorethan 300 pilots,copilots, financialkickback to the CIA.
    [Show full text]