DOCSLIB.ORG

Demil Dispatch

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Demil Dispatch Volume X Issue I Volume X, Issue I June 2014 Demil Dispatch Recent Progress on the Blue Grass Army Depot Demilitarization Effort. Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection Division of Waste Management Hazardous Waste Branch Blue Grass Army Depot Section News On Three Reviews The Hazardous Waste Branch (HWB) has received three permit applications recently from the Blue Grass Army Depot (BGAD) and the Blue Grass Chemical Agent-Destruction Pilot Plant (BGCAPP), located near Richmond, Ky. This means that the Permitting Section is going to be very busy for quite some time! Why is that? When a permit application is submitted, there are many pages included, full of information about how the appli- cant plans to handle the hazardous waste that Inside they will generate and/or dispose. This infor- mation will include personnel training, hazardous • Three major permit waste codes, container types, disposal/recycling actions keeping KDEP methods, security measures, and everything in A fine stack of material for KDEP’s summer reading program. between. The Permitting Section has to ensure busy in 2014 pg. 1 that this information meets the regulations of the Kentucky Department for Environmental Protec- • BGAD provides conventional ammunition ser- BGCAPP Applies for tion (KDEP) and US Environmental Protection vices, chemical defense equipment management TSCA Permit pg. 1 Agency (EPA) before the facility operates. and manufacturing capabilities for the Depart- What applications were submitted? The three ment of Defense. The Blue Grass Chemical Activi- • BGCAPP construction submitted are listed here and will be explained ty (BGCA), a tenant of the 15,000-acre depot, is below: responsible for safekeeping the chemical weap- photos pg. 2 ons stockpile stored at the depot. BGAD and BGAD 10 Year Renewal Application • BGAD 10 Year Renewal Application BGCA have submitted an application to the KDEP, EEC Secretary Visits BGAD Class 3 Permit Modification – Addition of Division of Waste Management (DWM), for renew- BGCAPP pg. 3 the Explosive Destruction Technology unit al of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act BGCAPP RD&D Revision 5 (RCRA) hazardous waste storage permit. The • Rocket separation for RCRA permit, set to expire in September 2014, BGAD 10 Year Renewal Application (referred to covers conventional munitions operations, dis- propellant sampling as: Renewal) posal and waste storage in (continued on page 4) complete pg. 3 • KDEP visits Anniston TSCA Permit Required to Process SFTs SDC pg. 3 The Toxic Substance Control Act sets limits for PCB contamina- popular for many years in indus- (TSCA) is a United States law, tion of the environment. PCBs try and as a result were widely passed by Congress in 1976, are synthetic organic chemical distributed in many previously which regulates the introduction compounds of chlorine at- manufactured products. of new or already existing chem- tached to biphenyl, which is a icals used nationwide, totaling molecule composed of two ben- The M55 rockets that will be in excess of 84,000 chemicals. zene rings. There are over 200 disposed of at BGCAPP consist Acting under TSCA, the US Envi- different chemical configura- of a fin nozzle assembly, a rock- ronmental Protection Agency tions for this class of chemicals et motor, a chemical agent- (EPA) regulates Polychlorinated which vary by the number of filled warhead and fuse. Each Biphenyl (PCB) disposal and chlorine atoms. PCBs were individual rocket is stored in a (Continued on page 4) Volume X Issue I Page 2 BGCAPP Construction Photos Chemical agent destruction will be verified in the laboratory building The energetic neutralization reactors (ENR) treat the energetic hydrolysate from the energetic batch hydrolyzer (EBH) Consoles in the control and support building allow operators the ability to Massive runs of piping in the utility building (UB) distribute various process remotely control and monitor the chemical demilitarization equipment chemicals, water, and steam throughout the BGCAPP The munitions washout system (MWS) will rinse agent out of the agent cavity The Super Critical Water Oxidation (SCWO) tank farm pads are set, coated of nerve agent projectiles and tanks are currently being erected in this area Volume X Issue I Page 3 Secretary Peters Walks the BGCAPP Site Kentucky Energy and Environmental Cabinet Sec- temization accomplishments, discussion of the retary, Len Peters visited the Blue Grass Chemical proposed Explosive Destruction Technology (EDT), Agent-Destruction Pilot Plant (BGCAPP) on Jan. a viewing of the BGCAPP process video, as well as 16, 2014 to personally see the progress that has a walk-through of the construction site. occurred at the site. At the time construction was Secretary Peters’ attention to the site was a wel- over 75 percent complete with the early stages of come development in a time when Kentucky De- systemization occurring making it an ideal oppor- partment for Environmental Protection staff from tunity to actually see several years of planning both the field office and permitting section have taking shape into what will be the safe destruc- enjoyed increased engagement through meetings tion of the Blue Grass Army Depot’s chemical and site visits as the facility rapidly approaches weapons stockpile. operation. Energy and Environment Cabinet Secretary Highlights of the visit included a review of the Len Peters current project schedule, construction and sys- Nerve Agent Rocket Separation Complete Workers at Blue Grass Chemical Activity (BGCA) Twenty-three of the motor segments were have successfully and safely removed the motors shipped to U.S. Army Research, Development and from 42 nerve agent rockets as of March 26. The Engineering Center at Picatinny Arsenal, NJ for warhead segments of the rockets were over- compositional analysis and testing while the re- packed into a single round container and placed maining 19 were placed in storage at the depot back into storage in the earthen igloos that store for future testing to support the chemical demili- the stockpile present at the Blue Grass Army De- tarization effort at the Blue Grass Chemical-Agent pot (BGAD). Pilot Plant (BGCAPP) currently under construction. M55 rocket (right) and shipping KDEP Views Anniston SDC and firing tube (left). Kentucky Department for Environmental Protec- unit with operators in Alabama, get a close-up tion (KDEP) employees received an opportunity in view of the equipment as it processed conven- May to return to Anniston, Alabama and see the tional munitions, and meet with representatives Static Detonation Chamber (SDC) responsible for of the Alabama Department of Environmental destroying the problematic mustard munitions Management (ADEM) to discuss lessons learned that were present at Anniston Army Depot (ANAD). during their time on the Anniston Chemical Agent The unit is the same basic design as the one pro- Disposal Facility (ANCDF) mission. posed for construction at the Blue Grass Army Following the trip to Anniston the BGAD Section Depot. Kentucky is currently in the process of Permitting team travelled to Atlanta to meet and reviewing the modification to the Part B Blue Grass Army Depot (BGAD) concerning the inclu- have a follow-up discussion on the progress of sion of the SDC into the permit as a Subpart X the TSCA permit with Environmental Protection Munitions scrap metals similar to this miscellaneous unit. Agency (EPA) Region 4 as well as delve into the archives there for documents to supplement resulting from SDC treatment, will be Kentucky used the opportunity to discuss the SDC released for recycling at an appropriate those in the state’s database. facility. Volume X Issue I Page 4 News On Three Reviews (Continued) two munitions bunkers (igloos), of this request for Class 3 Modi- application. Most of the updat- as well as chemical munitions fication to the BGAD RCRA Haz- ed information describes how waste stored in 47 igloos. This ardous Waste Permit. BGAD, in the BGCAPP facility will be oper- renewal permit would allow collaboration with BGCAPP sys- ated and includes a revised list of engineering drawings neces- them to continue these RCRA tems contractor Bechtel Par- sary to describe the BGCAPP activities and give them the sons Blue Grass as the permit operations. Once the RD&D required conditions that they operator, has formally submit- permit is completed and the GB have to follow along the way. ted this permit modification munitions are disposed of, the request to KDEP. BGCAPP facility will then have BGAD Class 3 Permit Modifica- BGAD Class 3 Permit Modifica- to apply for a Part B RCRA Per- tion ––– Addition of the Explosive BGCAPP RD&D Revision 5 mit in order to use the facility to Destruction Technology unit (referred to as: Rev 5) dispose of the VX munitions (referred to as: EDT) The previously approved re- that are currently stored at the BGCA tenant igloos at BGAD. BGCAPP has selected an explo- search, development, and If you have any further ques- Example of a hazardous waste label re- sive destruction technology demonstration (RD&D) permit tions on the activities at the quired by RCRA (EDT) system to safely destroy application for the BGCAPP facility allows for the time to BGAD or the BGCAPP facility, the mustard stockpile deemed design and build a waste dis- please visit these websites or unsuitable for processing posal plant according to regula- contact the public affairs indi- through the main pilot plant. tions for the destruction of the vidual listed. Because solidification of the GB munitions that are currently mustard agent was found in a stored at the BGCA tenant ig- BGCAPP: http:// The Permitting Section significant number of mustard loos at BGAD. This revision www.peoacwa.army.mil/ has to ensure that this (Rev 5) to the RD&D permit bgcapp/ projectiles, rendering them information meets the unsuitable for the automated application provides additional, Stephanie Parrett: 859-624- regulations of the neutralization process, the EDT updated information that has 6326 become available since approv- system will be employed to de- Kentucky Department for al of the previous version of this stroy the entire Blue Grass mus- BGAD: http:// Environmental Protection application.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The History of the Chemical Weapons Movement
    Chemical Weapons Movement History Compilation William R. Brankowitz 27 April 1987 . Office of the Program Manager for Chemical Munitions (Demilitarization and Binary) (Provisional) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010-5401 I Chemical Weapons Movement History CcX@latiOn Table of Contents Page Executive Surnnaq 1 How To Use The Cmpilation 2 Introduction 6 Location Key 15 Incident Summarization Sheets 18 Compilation of Moves Pages w Year 1946 11 pages 1947 1 page 1948 2 pages 1949 4 pages 1950 3 pages 1951 2 pages 1952 2 pages 1953 3 pages 1954 3 pages 1955 1 w-e 1956 2 pages 1957 2 pages 1958 3 pages 1959 1 page 1960 1 Page 1961 1 page 1962 2 pages 1963 3 pages 1964 4 pages . 1965 5 pages 1966 4 pages 1967 6 pages 1968 a pages 1969 1 Page 1970-77 2 pages SE'EONI 3 pages SmON II 2 pages 1981-86 3 pages Reccrmendations and Conclusioris 25 f-4 i 4' References Executive Summary The production of a compilation of movement operations provides a base of data which can be used or interpreted in many ways. Some are favorable to the Army, and some are not. However, the Army wishes to show that (1) it has moved large quantities of chemical weapons over many years with relatively few problems and that (2) the Army has learned lessons from the problems which is has encountered. The Army also shows in this study that although there have been some problems associated with the movement of chemical weapons, there has never been a chemical agent fatality associated with such a move.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemical Weapons Conventions at 1
    Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 ½ Amy E. Smithson Report No. 25 September 1998 Copyright© 1998 11 Dupont Circle, NW Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone 202.223.5956 fax 202.238.9604 http://www.stimson.org email [email protected] Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 1/2 Amy E. Smithson INTRODUCTION On the 29th of April 1997, the majority of the world’s nations joined to activate an arms control and nonproliferation accord that will gradually compel the elimination of one of the most abhorred classes of weapons of all times. Previously, the international community had fallen short of the mark in efforts to try to abolish poison gas, despite the opprobrium following its widespread use in World War I.1 The new Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) extends the no use-prohibitions of the 1925 Geneva Protocol2 to outlaw the development, acquisition, production, transfer, and stockpiling of chemical weapons as well. The CWC requires the destruction of chemical weapons production facilities and arsenals over a ten-year period, and countries will witness the shrinking numbers of poison gas factories and munitions. A less tangible function of the CWC, but one that may turn out to be equally valued over the long term is that the CWC will help redefine how states assure their national security. The CWC requires nations to declare activities that were previously considered state secrets and private business information. The treaty authorizes routine and challenge inspections to monitor compliance with its prohibitions. Instead of building large caches of arms, the CWC’s verification processes give governments reason to be confident that managed transparency—a limited waiver of state sovereignty—can enhance national and international security.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Munitions Igloos for the Container Storage of Wastes Generated from the Maintenance of the Chemical Munitions Stockpile Attachment D.2
    Tooele Army Depot - South Hazardous Wae Storage Permit Permit Attachment 12 - Container Management Modification Date: March 3. 1994 Chemical Munitions Igloos for the Container Storage of Wastes Generated from the Maintenance of the Chemical Munitions Stockpile Attachment D.2. Containers with Free Liquids The stockpile of chemical munitions stored at TEAD(S) (which included the M-55 rockets before they were declarbed obsolete, and became a hazardous waste) requires continual maintenance. These maintenance activities generate wastes, examples of which are: The valves and plugs used on ton containers used to store bulk chemical agent are changed out on a periodic basis, the valves and plugs that are removed are decontaminated, containerized, and managed as a hazardous waste. Wastes of this type would typically carry waste numbers F999 and/or P999, in addition to other waste numbers where applicable. Discarded protective clothing (including suites, boots, gloves, canister to personnel breathing apparatus, etc.) is containerized and managed as a hazardous waste. Certain types of impregnated carbon have been found to contain chromium and silver in leachable quantities exceeding the TCLP criteria for hazardous waste. In such cases, EPA Waste Numbers D007 and DOll would be assigned to these wastes in addition to any other applicable hazardous waste numbers. Any indoor area where chemical agents, or agent filled munitions are stored has the potential to be ventilated. The air removed from the area passes through a bed of activated carbon before being released to the atmosphere. When the activated charcoal is changed out, the spent' carbon is containerized, and managed as a hazardous waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Department of Environmental Management
    ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED RENEWAL OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PERMIT UNDER THE ALABAMA HAZARDOUS WASTES MANAGEMENT AND MINIMIZATION ACT (AHWMMA) AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS PUBLIC NOTICE – 421 CALHOUN COUNTY Anniston Army Depot of Anniston, Alabama submitted to ADEM an application for renewal of its Hazardous Waste Facility permit for the 3 ANMC Conventional Waste Munitions Storage Igloos, 3 ANAD Industrial Waste Storage Buildings ,1 Roll-off Storage Building, 1 Open Burning Unit, 1 Open Detonation Unit, 1 Static Detonation Chamber (SDC), 3 SDC Service Magazines, 34 SDC Conventional Waste Munitions Storage Igloos, 1 Thermal Treatment Closed Disposal Process (TTCDP), 1 Energetic Treatment Unit (Flash Furnace), and 3 Rocket Motor Fire Units which are used to manage hazardous waste at its facility (EPA I.D. Number AL3 210 020 027 located at 7 Frankford Avenue, Anniston, Alabama 36201. The Department has determined the facility’s renewal application to be complete and has prepared a draft permit in accordance with State regulations. Anniston Army Depot operates a facility that treats and stores hazardous waste. The United States Department of the Army, Anniston Army Depot (Facility Owner, Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Operator); the United States Department of the Army, Anniston Munitions Center (Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Co- Operator (ANMC operations)); the United States Department of the Army, Anniston Field Office (AFO) (Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Co-Operator (Static Detonation Chamber (SDC) Site); and Washington Demilitarization Company LLC (Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Co-Operator (SDC site)) are the operators of the hazardous waste storage and treatment facility. The proposed permit renewal incorporates updates to the previous permit to reflect changes made to Part I thought IX of the AHWMMA permit.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Status Report on the Destruction of the United States Stockpile of Lethal Chemical Agents and Munitions for Fiscal Year 2019
    Annual Status Report on the Destruction of the United States Stockpile of Lethal Chemical Agents and Munitions for Fiscal Year 2019 September 30, 2019 The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $740 for the 2019 Fiscal Year. This includes $0 in expenses and $740 in DoD labor. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 II. Mission .................................................................................................................................1 III. Organization .........................................................................................................................1 IV. Current Status of U.S. Chemical Weapons Destruction ......................................................2 A. Site-by-Site Description of Chemical Weapons Stockpile Destruction……………….2 B. Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives Program……………………………..….3 V. Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program ......................................................5 VI. Funding Execution ...............................................................................................................7 VII. Safety Status of Chemical Weapons Stockpile Storage .......................................................8 APPENDICES A. Abbreviations and Symbols B. Program Disbursements C. Summary Occurrences of Leaking Chemical Munitions i I. Introduction The Department of Defense (DoD) is submitting
    [Show full text]
  • Desind Finding
    NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE ARCHIVES Herbert Stephen Desind Collection Accession No. 1997-0014 NASM 9A00657 National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC Brian D. Nicklas © Smithsonian Institution, 2003 NASM Archives Desind Collection 1997-0014 Herbert Stephen Desind Collection 109 Cubic Feet, 305 Boxes Biographical Note Herbert Stephen Desind was a Washington, DC area native born on January 15, 1945, raised in Silver Spring, Maryland and educated at the University of Maryland. He obtained his BA degree in Communications at Maryland in 1967, and began working in the local public schools as a science teacher. At the time of his death, in October 1992, he was a high school teacher and a freelance writer/lecturer on spaceflight. Desind also was an avid model rocketeer, specializing in using the Estes Cineroc, a model rocket with an 8mm movie camera mounted in the nose. To many members of the National Association of Rocketry (NAR), he was known as “Mr. Cineroc.” His extensive requests worldwide for information and photographs of rocketry programs even led to a visit from FBI agents who asked him about the nature of his activities. Mr. Desind used the collection to support his writings in NAR publications, and his building scale model rockets for NAR competitions. Desind also used the material in the classroom, and in promoting model rocket clubs to foster an interest in spaceflight among his students. Desind entered the NASA Teacher in Space program in 1985, but it is not clear how far along his submission rose in the selection process. He was not a semi-finalist, although he had a strong application.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT of KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION (At Lexington) JAMES A
    Case: 5:16-cv-00322-DCR Doc #: 14 Filed: 08/14/17 Page: 1 of 23 - Page ID#: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION (at Lexington) JAMES A. BILSKI and ) CHARLES M. HERALD, ) ) Civil Action No. 5: 16-322-DCR Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION RYAN D. MCCARTHY, Acting 1 ) AND ORDER Secretary, Department of the Army, et al. ) ) Defendants. *** *** *** *** This matter is pending for consideration of the defendant’s motion to dismiss a portion of the claims contained in the Complaint. [Record No. 6] For the reasons described herein, the motion will be granted, in part, and denied, in part. I. Background The Blue Grass Army Depot (“BGAD,” or “the Depot”), located in Richmond, Kentucky, supplies arms and munitions to Army installations in the southeastern United States—approximately 20-25% of the United States Army. [Record No. 6-1 at 4] The Depot stores and maintains both chemical and conventional munitions, including “sensitive Category I and II munitions” such as “ready-to-fire” Stinger missiles. [Id.] The Depot is the primary supplier of Arms, Ammunition & Explosives (“AA&E”) for Army special forces worldwide. 1 As of August 2, 2017, Ryan D. McCarthy is the Acting Secretary of the Army and is substituted as the defendant in this action pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. - 1 - Case: 5:16-cv-00322-DCR Doc #: 14 Filed: 08/14/17 Page: 2 of 23 - Page ID#: <pageID> [Id.] In accordance with its mission, the Depot operates 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, ready on short notice to supply Army forces heading into combat.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE of the MILITARY in KENTUCKY 2016 Update
    THE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE MILITARY IN KENTUCKY 2016 Update Paul Coomes, Ph.D., Emeritus Professor of Economics Janet Kelly, Ph.D., Professor and Executive Director Barry Kornstein, Research Manager Joe Slaughter, Research Assistant Sponsored by: The Kentucky Commission on Military Affairs This study was prepared under contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky, with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. prepared by: The Urban Studies Institute at the University of Louisville June 2016 Companion web site: http://kcma.ky.gov/Dashboard/Pages/default.aspx by Sarin Adhikari Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Employment .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Civilian Employment ................................................................................................................................. 6 Military Employment in Perspective ......................................................................................................... 9
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Disposal of Chemical Weapons in the Ocean: Background and Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL33432 U.S. Disposal of Chemical Weapons in the Ocean: Background and Issues for Congress Updated January 3, 2007 David M. Bearden Analyst in Environmental Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division U.S. Disposal of Chemical Weapons in the Ocean: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The U.S. Armed Forces disposed of chemical weapons in the ocean from World War I through 1970. At that time, it was thought that the vastness of ocean waters would absorb chemical agents that may leak from these weapons. However, public concerns about human health and environmental risks, and the economic effects of potential damage to marine resources, led to a statutory prohibition on the disposal of chemical weapons in the ocean in 1972. For many years, there was little attention to weapons that had been dumped offshore prior to this prohibition. However, the U.S. Army completed a report in 2001 indicating that the past disposal of chemical weapons in the ocean had been more common and widespread geographically than previously acknowledged. The Army cataloged 74 instances of disposal through 1970, including 32 instances off U.S. shores and 42 instances off foreign shores. The disclosure of these records has renewed public concern about lingering risks from chemical weapons still in the ocean today. The risk of exposure to chemical weapons dumped in the ocean depends on many factors, such as the extent to which chemical agents may have leaked into seawater and been diluted or degraded over time. Public health advocates have questioned whether contaminated seawater may contribute to certain symptoms among coastal populations, and environmental advocates have questioned whether leaked chemical agents may have affected fish stocks and other marine life.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Grass Army Depot Installation Action Plan 2001
    INSTALLATION ACTION PLAN for BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT Fiscal Yeal 2001 INSTALLATIONInstallation Action PlanACTION PLAN 2001 1998 BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT INSTALLATION ACTION PLAN 2001 BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT RICHMOND, KENTUCKY STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The purpose of this Installation Action Plan (IAP) is to outline the total multi-year Installation Restoration Program (IRP) for an installation. The plan will define all IRP requirements and propose a comprehensive approach and associated costs to conduct future investigations and remedial actions at each IRP site at the installation. In an effort to document planning information for the IRP manager, major army commands (MACOMs), installa- tions, executing agencies, regulatory agencies, and the public, an IAP has been completed for Blue Grass Army Depot (BGAD). The IAP is used to track requirements, schedules, and tentative budgets for all major Army installation restoration programs. All site specific funding and schedule information has been prepared according to projected overall Army funding levels and is therefore subject to change. Under current project funding, all remedial actions will be in place at BGAD by the end of 2001. Long term monitoring, long term maintenance, operations and remedial action opera- tions will be conducted as long as necessary. Blue Grass Army Depot - 2001 Installation Action Plan Statement of Purpose CONTRIBUTORS TO THE INSTALLATION ACTION PLAN Ahmad (Eddie) Allameh Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection - Risk Assessment Branch Jim Beaujon US Army Corps of
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Weapons Technology Section 4—Chemical Weapons Technology
    SECTION IV CHEMICAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY SECTION 4—CHEMICAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY Scope Highlights 4.1 Chemical Material Production ........................................................II-4-8 4.2 Dissemination, Dispersion, and Weapons Testing ..........................II-4-22 • Chemical weapons (CW) are relatively inexpensive to produce. 4.3 Detection, Warning, and Identification...........................................II-4-27 • CW can affect opposing forces without damaging infrastructure. 4.4 Chemical Defense Systems ............................................................II-4-34 • CW can be psychologically devastating. • Blister agents create casualties requiring attention and inhibiting BACKGROUND force efficiency. • Defensive measures can be taken to negate the effect of CW. Chemical weapons are defined as weapons using the toxic properties of chemi- • Donning of protective gear reduces combat efficiency of troops. cal substances rather than their explosive properties to produce physical or physiologi- • Key to employment is dissemination and dispersion of agents. cal effects on an enemy. Although instances of what might be styled as chemical weapons date to antiquity, much of the lore of chemical weapons as viewed today has • CW are highly susceptible to environmental effects (temperature, its origins in World War I. During that conflict “gas” (actually an aerosol or vapor) winds). was used effectively on numerous occasions by both sides to alter the outcome of • Offensive use of CW complicates command and control and battles. A significant number of battlefield casualties were sustained. The Geneva logistics problems. Protocol, prohibiting use of chemical weapons in warfare, was signed in 1925. Sev- eral nations, the United States included, signed with a reservation forswearing only the first use of the weapons and reserved the right to retaliate in kind if chemical weapons were used against them.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-95-67 Chemical Weapons: Stability of the U.S. Stockpile
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee GAO on Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources, Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives December 1994 CHEMICAL WEAPONS Stability of the U.S. Stockpile GAO/NSIAD-95-67 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-259506 December 22, 1994 The Honorable Mike Synar Chairman, Subcommittee on Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources Committee on Government Operations House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Since 1985, the U.S. Army has been working to implement congressional direction to dispose of the U.S. stockpile of unitary1 chemical weapons and agents—a process the Army currently estimates will cost $8.5 billion. Because the Army continues to experience delays in implementing its disposal program and may have to store the stockpile longer than planned, you asked us to review the Army’s (1) prediction of how long chemical weapons can be stored safely and (2) contingency plans for disposing of chemical weapons that become dangerous. Background In November 1985, Congress passed Public Law 99-145 directing the Department of Defense (DOD) to destroy its stockpile of unitary chemical agents and weapons by September 30, 1994. The weapons are stored at eight sites in the continental United States and on Johnston Atoll in the Pacific Ocean. (See app. I for the stockpile munitions and storage locations.) To comply with the congressional direction, the Army, DOD’s lead service in chemical matters, developed a plan to burn the stockpile on-site in specially designed high-temperature incinerators.
    [Show full text]