DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 49/Thursday, March 13

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

11974 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 2003 / Rules and Regulations a designee, and is a thorough review of DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LIBRARY OF CONGRESS the case. The formal review determination shall be based on the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 36 CFR Part 704 information, upon which the initial Corporation determination and/or reconsideration National Film Preservation Board; determination was based, and any 33 CFR Part 401 1994–2002 Films Selected for Inclusion additional information the appealing in the National Film Registry party may submit or OCHAMPUS may [Docket No. SLSDC 2002–13698] AGENCY: National Film Preservation obtain. Board, Library of Congress. (3) Timeliness of formal review RIN 2135–AA15 ACTION: Final rule. determination. The Chief, Office of SUMMARY: The Librarian of Congress is Appeals and Hearings, OCHAMPUS, or Seaway Regulations and Rules: publishing the following list of films a designee normally shall issue the Automatic Identification System formal review determination no later selected from 1994–2002 for inclusion in the National Film Registry in the than 90 days from the date of receipt of AGENCY: Saint Lawrence Seaway Library of Congress pursuant to section the request for formal review by the Development Corporation, DOT. OCHAMPUS. 103 of the National Film Preservation (4) Notice of formal review ACTION: Final rule; correction. Act of 1996. The films are published to determination. The Chief, Office of notify the public of the Librarian’s Appeals and Hearings, OCHAMPUS, or SUMMARY: In the Saint Lawrence Seaway selection of twenty-five films selected in a designee shall issue a written notice Development Corporation (SLSDC) final each of these years deemed to be of the formal review determination to rule amending the Seaway regulations ‘‘culturally, historically or aesthetically the appealing party at his or her last and rules (33 CFR part 401) published significant’’ in accordance with known address. The notice of the formal in the Federal Register on February 28, Congress’ mandate. These 225 new films review determination must contain the 2003 (68 FR 9549), an inadvertent error join the 125 films already selected for following elements: was made in the heading of the new inclusion in the Registry under section 203 of the 1992 Act, as well as (i) A statement of the issue or issues § 401.20. This document corrects that previously chosen under section 3 of under appeal. error. Pub. L. 100–446. The National Film (ii) The provisions of law, regulation, DATES: Effective on March 25, 2003. Preservation Act of 1988. The policies, and guidelines that apply to Librarian’s goal in administering the Act the issue or issues under appeal. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: is to promote the preservation of all (iii) A discussion of the original and Marc C. Owen, Chief Counsel, Saint genres of film, represented by the additional information that is relevant Lawrence Seaway Development diverse list of films selected for to the issue or issues under appeal. Corporation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., inclusion in the Registry, and to (iv) Whether the formal review Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366–6823. generate public interest in film as an art upholds the prior determination or form deserving of preservation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: determinations or reverses the prior In the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development EFFECTIVE DATE: Date of Publication. determination or determinations in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: whole or in part and the rationale for Corporation (SLSDC) final rule amending the Seaway regulations and Steve Leggett, Staff Coordinator, The the action. National Film Preservation Board. (v) A statement of the right to request rules (33 CFR part 401) published in the Federal Register on February 28, 2003 Telephone (202) 707–5912; telefax (202) a hearing in any case when the formal 707–2371; email: [email protected]. review determination is less than fully (68 FR 9549), an inadvertent error was made in the heading of the new SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August favorable, the issue is appealable, and 9, 1990 (55 FR 32567), the Librarian of the amount in dispute is $300 or more. § 401.20. In the heading, the word ‘‘Automated’’ should have been Congress published the list of films for (5) Effect of formal review 1989 for inclusion in the National Film ‘‘Automatic.’’ This correction makes determination. The formal review Registry in the Library of Congress. On that change. determination is final if one or more of December 24, 1990 (55 FR 52844) the the following exist: In rule FR Doc. 03–4740 published in Librarian published the list of films for (i) The issue is not appealable. (See the Federal Register on February 28, 1990. On September 30, 1991 (56 FR paragraph (a)(6) of this section.) 2003 (68 FR 9549), make the following 49413) the Librarian published the list (ii) The amount in dispute is less than correction: of films for 1991. On July 8, 1994 (59 FR $300. (See paragraph (a)(7) of this 1. On page 9551, in the heading of the 35034) the Librarian published the list section.) new § 401.20, remove ‘‘Automated’’ and of films for 1992 and 1993, bringing the (iii) Appeal rights have been offered add in its place ‘‘Automatic’’. total to 125 films selected under the but a request for hearing is not received 1988 and 1992 Acts. Today, the by OCHAMPUS within 60 days of the Issued in Washington, DC on March 10, Librarian publishes the sixth-fourteenth date of the notice of the formal review 2003. lists of films for inclusion in the determination. Saint Lawrence Seaway Development National Film Registry—twenty-five * * * * * Corporation. additional films selected in each year, Marc C. Owen, 1994–2002, added to the films already Dated: March 7, 2003. Chief Counsel. selected. L.M. Bynum, [FR Doc. 03–6048 Filed 3–12–03; 8:45 am] The 1988 Act expired on September Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 27, 1991. The 1992 Act expired on June Officer, Department of Defense. BILLING CODE 4910–61–P 26, 1996. On October 11, 1996, [FR Doc. 03–5954 Filed 3–12–03; 8:45 am] President Clinton signed into law the BILLING CODE 5001–08–M National Film Preservation Act of 1996, VerDate Jan<31>2003 16:17 Mar 12, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM 13MRR1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 2003 / Rules and Regulations 11975 reauthorizing the National Film (10) Hospital (1970) § 704.27 Films Selected for Inclusion in the Preservation Board for an additional (11) Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) National Film Registry in the Library of seven years. The legislation [section (12) The Lady Eve (1941) Congress for 1996. 103(b), 2 U.S.C. 179m] requires the (13) Louisiana Story (1948) (a) The Librarian of Congress, Dr. Librarian of Congress, in consultation (14) The Manchurian Candidate (1962) James H. Billington, after consultation with his advisory group, the National (15) Marty (1955) with the National Film Preservation Film Preservation Board, to select up to (16) Meet Me in St. Louis (1944) Board, registers these films in the (17) Midnight Cowboy (1969) twenty-five films per year for inclusion National Film Registry within the (18) A Movie (1958) Library of Congress for 1996: in the Registry. Under the 1996 Act, (19) Pinocchio (1940) films are selected on the basis of their (20) Safety Last (1923) (1) The Awful Truth (1937) cultural, historical or aesthetic (21) Scarface (1932) (2) Broken Blossoms (1919) significance and they must be at least 10 (22) Snow White (1933) (3) The Deer Hunter (1978) years old. Films do not need to be (23) Tabu (1931) (4) Destry Rides Again (1939) feature length nor have had a theatrical (24) Taxi Driver (1976) (5) Flash Gordon serial (1936) release in order to be included. (25) Zapruder Film (1963) (6) The Forgotten Frontier (1931) These broad criteria allow many types (7) Frank Film (1973) (b) In keeping with section 106(a) of (8) The Graduate (1967) of films to be eligible for inclusion in (9) The Heiress (1949) the National Film Registry. In addition, the Act, 2 U.S.C. 179(p), the Librarian shall endeavor to obtain an archival (10) The Jazz Singer (1927) the Librarian’s procedures for public (11) Life and Times of Rosie the Riveter participation are intended to allow the quality copy for each of these twenty- (1980) public the greatest flexibility in five films for the National Film Registry (12) M*A*S*H (1970) nominating films for inclusion. This is Collection of the Library of Congress. (13) Mildred Pierce (1945) in keeping with the broad goals of the (14) The Outlaw Josey Wales (1976) 3. In subpart A, § 704.26 is added to (15) The Producers (1968) Librarian in administering the National read as follows: Film Preservation Act to promote (16) Pull My Daisy (1959) § 704.26 Films Selected for Inclusion in the (17) Road to Morocco (1942) preservation of the complete American (18) She Done Him Wrong (1933) film heritage and to generate public National Film Registry in the Library of Congress for 1995. (19) Shock Corridor (1963) interest for this cause. (20) Show Boat (1936) List of Subjects in 36 CFR part 704 (a) The Librarian of Congress, Dr. (21) The Thief of Baghdad (1924) James H. Billington, after consultation (22) To Be Or Not To Be (1942) Labeling, Libraries, Motion pictures. with the National Film Preservation (23) Topaz (1943–45) (home movie footage Board, registers these films in the taken at Japanese American Internment Publication of 1994–2002 Film Titles Camp, the Topaz War Relocation Authority National Film Registry within the In consideration of the foregoing, 36 Center) Library of Congress for 1995: (24) Verbena Tragica (1939) CFR part 704 is amended in the manner (25) Woodstock (1970) set forth below.
Recommended publications
  • I D II Ill TE 001 549 69 R

    I D II Ill TE 001 549 69 R

    DEPARTMENT bF HEALTH, EDUCATION,AND WELFARE OE FORM 6000, 2169 OFFICE OF EDUCATION tillt.;Kt.1-1.)1%Iilr..UIVIC. ERIC ACC. NO. ED 032 316 IS DOCUMENTCOPYRIGHTED? YES NO0 fit CH ACC. NO. P.A.PUBL. DATE. I ESTI\N 71031CREPRODUCTION RELEASE? YES 0 NO i LEVELOF AVAILABILITY I D II Ill TE 001 549 69 R -.... AUTHOR Sohn, David A. Stucker, Melinda . TITLE Film Study in the Elementary School: Grades Kindergartenthrough Eight. A Curriculum Report to the American Film Institute. SOURCE CODEINSTITUTIONSOURCE) J1M25110 SP. AG. CODESPONSORING AGENCY BBB01992 . EDRS PRICE CONTRACT NO. GRANT NO. 1.25;14.60 REPORT. NO. BUREAU NO. AVAILABILITY JOURNAL CITATION DESCRIPTIVE NOTE 290p. DESCRIPTORS *Film Study; *Elementary Grades; *Instructional Aids; *ProgramEvaluation; *Films; Experimental Programs; Audiovisual Aids; Audiovisual Communication;Cartoons; Mass Media; Photography; Sound Effects; Sound Films; Teaching Methods;Teacher. Attitudes; Student Reaction; Student Attitudes IDENTIFIERS I . ABSTRACT The first and major portion of this 'report of ,a film study projectin Evanston, Illinois, lists films selected for use in grades 1-8, together with plotsummaries of varying lengths, special uses for the films, suggested study questionsand activities, sample student responses to questions and assignments,running times, appropriate age levels, and sourceslor ordering the filmt. Theresults of an evaluation of the film program as determined by questionnaires distributed to students and teachers are presented in parts two and three. A briefconclusion on the overall response to the program and the addresses of filmdistributors conclude the publication. (LH) . -... U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION d WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY.
  • Introduction to Screenwriting 1: the 5 Elements

    Introduction to Screenwriting 1: the 5 Elements

    Introduction to screenwriting 1: The 5 elements by Allen Palmer Session 1 Introduction www.crackingyarns.com.au 1 Can we find a movie we all love? •Avatar? •Lord of the Rings? •Star Wars? •Groundhog Day? •Raiders of the Lost Ark? •When Harry Met Sally? 2 Why do people love movies? •Entertained •Escape •Educated •Provoked •Affirmed •Transported •Inspired •Moved - laugh, cry 3 Why did Aristotle think people loved movies? •Catharsis •Emotional cleansing or purging •What delivers catharsis? •Seeing hero undertake journey that transforms 4 5 “I think that what we’re seeking is an experience of being alive ... ... so that we can actually feel the rapture being alive.” Joseph Campbell “The Power of Myth” 6 What are audiences looking for? • Expand emotional bandwidth • Reminder of higher self • Universal connection • In summary ... • Cracking yarns 7 8 Me 9 You (in 1 min or less) •Name •Day job •Done any courses? Read any books? Written any screenplays? •Have a concept? •Which film would you like to have written? 10 What’s the hardest part of writing a cracking screenplay? •Concept? •Characters? •Story? •Scenes? •Dialogue? 11 Typical script report Excellent Good Fair Poor Concept X Character X Dialogue X Structure X Emotional Engagement X 12 Story without emotional engagement isn’t story. It’s just plot. 13 Plot isn’t the end. It’s just the means. 14 Stories don’t happen in the head. They grab us by the heart. 15 What is structure? •The craft of storytelling •How we engage emotions •How we generate catharsis •How we deliver what audiences crave 16
  • The New Hollywood Films

    The New Hollywood Films

    The New Hollywood Films The following is a chronological list of those films that are generally considered to be "New Hollywood" productions. Shadows (1959) d John Cassavetes First independent American Film. Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966) d. Mike Nichols Bonnie and Clyde (1967) d. Arthur Penn The Graduate (1967) d. Mike Nichols In Cold Blood (1967) d. Richard Brooks The Dirty Dozen (1967) d. Robert Aldrich Dont Look Back (1967) d. D.A. Pennebaker Point Blank (1967) d. John Boorman Coogan's Bluff (1968) – d. Don Siegel Greetings (1968) d. Brian De Palma 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) d. Stanley Kubrick Planet of the Apes (1968) d. Franklin J. Schaffner Petulia (1968) d. Richard Lester Rosemary's Baby (1968) – d. Roman Polanski The Producers (1968) d. Mel Brooks Bullitt (1968) d. Peter Yates Night of the Living Dead (1968) – d. George Romero Head (1968) d. Bob Rafelson Alice's Restaurant (1969) d. Arthur Penn Easy Rider (1969) d. Dennis Hopper Medium Cool (1969) d. Haskell Wexler Midnight Cowboy (1969) d. John Schlesinger The Rain People (1969) – d. Francis Ford Coppola Take the Money and Run (1969) d. Woody Allen The Wild Bunch (1969) d. Sam Peckinpah Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice (1969) d. Paul Mazursky Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid (1969) d. George Roy Hill They Shoot Horses, Don't They? (1969) – d. Sydney Pollack Alex in Wonderland (1970) d. Paul Mazursky Catch-22 (1970) d. Mike Nichols MASH (1970) d. Robert Altman Love Story (1970) d. Arthur Hiller Airport (1970) d. George Seaton The Strawberry Statement (1970) d.
  • INTRODUCTION Fatal Attraction and Scarface

    INTRODUCTION Fatal Attraction and Scarface

    1 introduction Fatal Attraction and Scarface How We Think about Movies People respond to movies in different ways, and there are many reasons for this. We have all stood in the lobby of a theater and heard conflicting opin- ions from people who have just seen the same film. Some loved it, some were annoyed by it, some found it just OK. Perhaps we’ve thought, “Well, what do they know? Maybe they just didn’t get it.” So we go to the reviewers whose business it is to “get it.” But often they do not agree. One reviewer will love it, the next will tell us to save our money. What thrills one person may bore or even offend another. Disagreements and controversies, however, can reveal a great deal about the assumptions underlying these varying responses. If we explore these assumptions, we can ask questions about how sound they are. Questioning our assumptions and those of others is a good way to start think- ing about movies. We will soon see that there are many productive ways of thinking about movies and many approaches that we can use to analyze them. In Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story (1992), the actor playing Bruce Lee sits in an American movie theater (figure 1.1) and watches a scene from Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961) in which Audrey Hepburn’s glamorous character awakens her upstairs neighbor, Mr Yunioshi. Half awake, he jumps up, bangs his head on a low-hanging, “Oriental”-style lamp, and stumbles around his apart- ment crashing into things.
  • The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013

    The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013

    The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013 COUNCIL ON LIBRARY AND INFORMATION RESOURCES AND THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013 Mr. Pierce has also created a da tabase of location information on the archival film holdings identified in the course of his research. See www.loc.gov/film. Commissioned for and sponsored by the National Film Preservation Board Council on Library and Information Resources and The Library of Congress Washington, D.C. The National Film Preservation Board The National Film Preservation Board was established at the Library of Congress by the National Film Preservation Act of 1988, and most recently reauthorized by the U.S. Congress in 2008. Among the provisions of the law is a mandate to “undertake studies and investigations of film preservation activities as needed, including the efficacy of new technologies, and recommend solutions to- im prove these practices.” More information about the National Film Preservation Board can be found at http://www.loc.gov/film/. ISBN 978-1-932326-39-0 CLIR Publication No. 158 Copublished by: Council on Library and Information Resources The Library of Congress 1707 L Street NW, Suite 650 and 101 Independence Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20036 Washington, DC 20540 Web site at http://www.clir.org Web site at http://www.loc.gov Additional copies are available for $30 each. Orders may be placed through CLIR’s Web site. This publication is also available online at no charge at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub158.
  • **V************************************ Reproductions Supplied by Edits Are the Best That Can Be Made Froa Tae Original Document

    **V************************************ Reproductions Supplied by Edits Are the Best That Can Be Made Froa Tae Original Document

    D0006661 RESUME ED 166 926 CS 205 566 AUTdOR Spann, Sylvia, El.; Culp, Mary Beth, Ed. TITLE Thematic Units in leaching English and the dumanities. Second Supplement. INsTirurION National Couacil of Teachers of English, Urbana, PUB DATE 30 NOTE 159p. AVAILABLE FRO3 Sational Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801 (Stock No. 53755, $6.50-member, $7.00 non-member). EDRS PRICE SF01/PCO7 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Advertising; Communication Skills; Curriculum Development; *English Instruction; Futures (of Society); History; *Humanities: Justice: Listening Sicills; Logic; Politics; Popular Culture: Resource Units; Schools; Secondary Education; *Teaching Guides; *Thematic Approach; *Units of Study; Writing Instruction; Writing Skills ABSTRACT Tae seven units in this second supplement to "Thematic Units" focus oa communication skills, offering English teachers conteaporary plans for teaching writing, listening, persuasion, and'reasoning. The units were selected for their humanistic approaches to student language learning, combining English instruction with,topics in the humanities. Each unit contains comments from the teacher who developed the unit, an overview of the unit, general obfectives, evaluation methods, daily lesson plans and activities, study guides, resource materials, and other appropriate suggestions and at:dchments. The topics of the units are the school system, logic, nostaigia (studying the popular culture ofa past decade), futurism as a framework for composition instruction, advertising, politics, and law and justice. (RL) ********************************v************************************ Reproductions supplied by EDitS are the best that can be made froa tae original document. *********************************************************************** U S DEPARTMENT OF nEALTN. EDUCATION A TVILITAIIE NTMNAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION TmpSDOC UMENT HAS BEEN REPRO. nur.t.,E.A Fl V AS RECEIVED FROM 111 -Admai-i-ka *HI Pf RsON OR ORCAN QAT tON OSI 'GIN- I.
  • Cross-Evaluation of Metrics to Estimate the Significance of Creative Works

    Cross-Evaluation of Metrics to Estimate the Significance of Creative Works

    Cross-evaluation of metrics to estimate the significance of creative works Max Wassermana, Xiao Han T. Zengb, and Luís A. Nunes Amaralb,c,d,e,1 Departments of aEngineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics, bChemical and Biological Engineering, and cPhysics and Astronomy, dHoward Hughes Medical Institute, and eNorthwestern Institute on Complex Systems, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208 Edited by Kenneth W. Wachter, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved December 1, 2014 (received for review June 27, 2014) In a world overflowing with creative works, it is useful to be able a more nuanced estimation of significance, it is also more diffi- to filter out the unimportant works so that the significant ones cult to measure. For example, Ingmar Bergman’s influence on can be identified and thereby absorbed. An automated method later film directors is undebatable (4, 5), but not easily quanti- could provide an objective approach for evaluating the significance fied. Despite different strengths and limitations, any quantitative of works on a universal scale. However, there have been few approaches that result in an adequate estimation of significance attempts at creating such a measure, and there are few “ground should be strongly correlated when evaluated over a large corpus truths” for validating the effectiveness of potential metrics for sig- of creative works. nificance. For movies, the US Library of Congress’s National Film By definition, the latent variable for a creative work is in- “ accessible. However, for the medium of films—which will be the Registry (NFR) contains American films that are culturally, histori- — cally, or aesthetically significant” as chosen through a careful focus of this work there is in fact as close to a measurement of the latent variable as one could hope for.
  • The Digital Dilemma 2 Perspectives from Independent Filmmakers, Documentarians and Nonprofi T Audiovisual Archives

    The Digital Dilemma 2 Perspectives from Independent Filmmakers, Documentarians and Nonprofi T Audiovisual Archives

    Copyright ©2012 Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. “Oscar,” “Academy Award,” and the Oscar statuette are registered trademarks, and the Oscar statuette the copyrighted property, of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. The accuracy, completeness, and adequacy of the content herein are not guaranteed, and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences expressly disclaims all warranties, including warranties of merchantability, fi tness for a particular purpose and non-infringement. Any legal information contained herein is not legal advice, and is not a substitute for advice of an attorney. All rights reserved under international copyright conventions. No part of this document may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the publisher. Published by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Inquiries should be addressed to: Science and Technology Council Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences 1313 Vine Street, Hollywood, CA 90028 (310) 247-3000 http://www.oscars.org Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Digital Dilemma 2 Perspectives from Independent Filmmakers, Documentarians and Nonprofi t Audiovisual Archives 1. Digital preservation – Case Studies. 2. Film Archives – Technological Innovations 3. Independent Filmmakers 4. Documentary Films 5. Audiovisual I. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and
  • The Field Guide to Sponsored Films

    The Field Guide to Sponsored Films

    THE FIELD GUIDE TO SPONSORED FILMS by Rick Prelinger National Film Preservation Foundation San Francisco, California Rick Prelinger is the founder of the Prelinger Archives, a collection of 51,000 advertising, educational, industrial, and amateur films that was acquired by the Library of Congress in 2002. He has partnered with the Internet Archive (www.archive.org) to make 2,000 films from his collection available online and worked with the Voyager Company to produce 14 laser discs and CD-ROMs of films drawn from his collection, including Ephemeral Films, the series Our Secret Century, and Call It Home: The House That Private Enterprise Built. In 2004, Rick and Megan Shaw Prelinger established the Prelinger Library in San Francisco. National Film Preservation Foundation 870 Market Street, Suite 1113 San Francisco, CA 94102 © 2006 by the National Film Preservation Foundation Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Prelinger, Rick, 1953– The field guide to sponsored films / Rick Prelinger. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 0-9747099-3-X (alk. paper) 1. Industrial films—Catalogs. 2. Business—Film catalogs. 3. Motion pictures in adver- tising. 4. Business in motion pictures. I. Title. HF1007.P863 2006 011´.372—dc22 2006029038 CIP This publication was made possible through a grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. It may be downloaded as a PDF file from the National Film Preservation Foundation Web site: www.filmpreservation.org. Photo credits Cover and title page (from left): Admiral Cigarette (1897), courtesy of Library of Congress; Now You’re Talking (1927), courtesy of Library of Congress; Highlights and Shadows (1938), courtesy of George Eastman House.
  • National Film Registry

    National Film Registry

    National Film Registry Title Year EIDR ID Newark Athlete 1891 10.5240/FEE2-E691-79FD-3A8F-1535-F Blacksmith Scene 1893 10.5240/2AB8-4AFC-2553-80C1-9064-6 Dickson Experimental Sound Film 1894 10.5240/4EB8-26E6-47B7-0C2C-7D53-D Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze 1894 10.5240/B1CF-7D4D-6EE3-9883-F9A7-E Rip Van Winkle 1896 10.5240/0DA5-5701-4379-AC3B-1CC2-D The Kiss 1896 10.5240/BA2A-9E43-B6B1-A6AC-4974-8 Corbett-Fitzsimmons Title Fight 1897 10.5240/CE60-6F70-BD9E-5000-20AF-U Demolishing and Building Up the Star Theatre 1901 10.5240/65B2-B45C-F31B-8BB6-7AF3-S President McKinley Inauguration Footage 1901 10.5240/C276-6C50-F95E-F5D5-8DCB-L The Great Train Robbery 1903 10.5240/7791-8534-2C23-9030-8610-5 Westinghouse Works 1904 1904 10.5240/F72F-DF8B-F0E4-C293-54EF-U A Trip Down Market Street 1906 10.5240/A2E6-ED22-1293-D668-F4AB-I Dream of a Rarebit Fiend 1906 10.5240/4D64-D9DD-7AA2-5554-1413-S San Francisco Earthquake and Fire, April 18, 1906 1906 10.5240/69AE-11AD-4663-C176-E22B-I A Corner in Wheat 1909 10.5240/5E95-74AC-CF2C-3B9C-30BC-7 Lady Helen’s Escapade 1909 10.5240/0807-6B6B-F7BA-1702-BAFC-J Princess Nicotine; or, The Smoke Fairy 1909 10.5240/C704-BD6D-0E12-719D-E093-E Jeffries-Johnson World’s Championship Boxing Contest 1910 10.5240/A8C0-4272-5D72-5611-D55A-S White Fawn’s Devotion 1910 10.5240/0132-74F5-FC39-1213-6D0D-Z Little Nemo 1911 10.5240/5A62-BCF8-51D5-64DB-1A86-H A Cure for Pokeritis 1912 10.5240/7E6A-CB37-B67E-A743-7341-L From the Manger to the Cross 1912 10.5240/5EBB-EE8A-91C0-8E48-DDA8-Q The Cry of the Children 1912 10.5240/C173-A4A7-2A2B-E702-33E8-N
  • Film Noir: the Most American Film Genre

    Film Noir: the Most American Film Genre

    10/22/2019 FILM NOIR: THE MOST AMERICAN FILM GENRE THE WORLD ACCORDING TO FILM NOIR •“The most American ROGER film genre, because no EBERT: society could have created a world so filled with doom, fate, fear and betrayal, unless it were essentially naive and optimistic.” 1 10/22/2019 THE WORLD ACCORDING TO FILM NOIR The following slides will give you some descriptions of the world as it is portrayed in film noir. • Sam Spade (the detective) tells his client, Bridget O'Shaughnessy, an anecdote about a man named Flitcraft who one day suddenly went missing. • Spade, hired by Flitcraft's wife, is unable to locate him. A few years later, quite by accident, he encounters Flitcraft in another town and then discovers what had caused his disappearance. T 2 10/22/2019 ON THE DAY OF HIS DISAPPEARANCE, FLITCRAFT, WALKING BACK FROM LUNCH, HAD ALMOST BEEN KILLED BY A FALLING BEAM. STRUCK SUDDENLY BY THE ABSURDITY OF HOW EASILY HIS LIFE COULD HAVE BEEN ENDED •(“He knew then that men died at haphazard like that, and lived only while blind chance spared them”), 3 10/22/2019 •he walks away from his job and marriage and all his responsibilities. He settles in another town and after a period of time, rebuilds his life in the same mold as before the incident with the falling beam. • According to Foster Hirsch in Film Noir: The Dark Side of the Screen: “Like Flitcraft, Spade is clear-sighted --- pitilessly so, in fact --- proceeding as if the world makes sense and adds up to something when he knows it really doesn't.
  • National Film Registry Titles Listed by Release Date

    National Film Registry Titles Listed by Release Date

    National Film Registry Titles 1989-2017: Listed by Year of Release Year Year Title Released Inducted Newark Athlete 1891 2010 Blacksmith Scene 1893 1995 Dickson Experimental Sound Film 1894-1895 2003 Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze 1894 2015 The Kiss 1896 1999 Rip Van Winkle 1896 1995 Corbett-Fitzsimmons Title Fight 1897 2012 Demolishing and Building Up the Star Theatre 1901 2002 President McKinley Inauguration Footage 1901 2000 The Great Train Robbery 1903 1990 Life of an American Fireman 1903 2016 Westinghouse Works 1904 1904 1998 Interior New York Subway, 14th Street to 42nd Street 1905 2017 Dream of a Rarebit Fiend 1906 2015 San Francisco Earthquake and Fire, April 18, 1906 1906 2005 A Trip Down Market Street 1906 2010 A Corner in Wheat 1909 1994 Lady Helen’s Escapade 1909 2004 Princess Nicotine; or, The Smoke Fairy 1909 2003 Jeffries-Johnson World’s Championship Boxing Contest 1910 2005 White Fawn’s Devotion 1910 2008 Little Nemo 1911 2009 The Cry of the Children 1912 2011 A Cure for Pokeritis 1912 2011 From the Manger to the Cross 1912 1998 The Land Beyond the Sunset 1912 2000 Musketeers of Pig Alley 1912 2016 Bert Williams Lime Kiln Club Field Day 1913 2014 The Evidence of the Film 1913 2001 Matrimony’s Speed Limit 1913 2003 Preservation of the Sign Language 1913 2010 Traffic in Souls 1913 2006 The Bargain 1914 2010 The Exploits of Elaine 1914 1994 Gertie The Dinosaur 1914 1991 In the Land of the Head Hunters 1914 1999 Mabel’s Blunder 1914 2009 1 National Film Registry Titles 1989-2017: Listed by Year of Release Year Year