DOCSLIB.ORG

An Introduction to Shale Oil &

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

An introduction to shale oil & gas Philippe Charlez, IOGP Shale drilling site in Pennsylvania - Photo Helge Hansen - Statoil IOGP members produce half of the world’s oil and a third of the natural gas Our main objective: promote safe, responsible and sustainable operations North America Europe Anadarko IADC Afren plc Eni NOGEPA RWE Dea AG API IAGC ASSOMMINERARIA Fairfield Energy Norwegian Oil & Gas Baker Hughes Kosmos Energy BG Group GALP Energia Oil Gas Denmark Shell CAPP Marathon Oil BP GdF Suez Oil & Gas UK Statoil Chevron Nexen Inc. Cairn Energy IOOA OMV Total CNR International Noble Energy DONG Energy IPIECA Perenco Holdings Tullow Oil ConocoPhillips Pemex E.ON Ruhrgas AS Maersk Oil Premier Oil WEG Devon Energy Schlumberger Energy Institute MOL plc Repsol Wintershall ExxonMobil Suncor Hess Corporation Talisman Energy 43 members active in region Husky Energy 36 members active in region Russia & Caspian region JSOC Bashneft NCOC Africa 21 members active in region Sasol Sonangol South America 41 members active in region ARPEL Petrobras IBP PLUSPETROL Pan American 31 members active in region Middle East ADNOC Qatar Petroleum Dolphin Energy RasGas Asia & Australia Dragon Oil Yemen LNG APPEA Origin Energy Kuwait Oil BHPBilliton Papuan Oil Search Cairn India Petronas 33 members active in region CNOOC PTTEP INPEX Woodside 32 members active in region 1. The US shale revolution Bakken In the 1990s and 2000s, the US is increasingly dependent on oil & gas imports. Prices are on an upward trend. It’s the trigger of an energy revolution: Marcellus Entrepreneurial experimentation in the Barnett Shale proves economic viability and triggers an energy revolution and Barnett Haynesville manufacturing renaissance. Eagle-Ford The shale revolution turns the US into one of the top global oil & gas producers First oil Second oil Oil counter crisis crisis shock Oil production peaks: Peak oil import: The US becomes the from now on, US the US has never largest gas producer in the production falls imported as world and the second much oil largest oil producer 1970 1973 1979 1986 2006 2014 Energy dependency (%) Oil dependency (%) Gas dependency (%) 75% 70% 20% Dependency = import/consumption 15% Oil 50% 60% Oil 10% Gas 25% Gas 50% 5% 0% 40% 0% 1 9 17 25 33 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 BP outlook 2014 BP outlook 2014 Shale drives down natural gas prices, giving the US economy a competitive edge 20 Gas prices ($/MBTU) Japan Energy-intensive industries benefit most: 15 Europe 10 Cement Glass Steel Petrochemicals Costs in the chemical industry drop, 5 US boosting production 0 Operating costs (US$/pound) Source: IFRI 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 1.0 BP outlook 2014 Europe 2012 Jobs are created (direct, indirect, induced) 2006 Source: IHS CERA 0.6 US Europe US 0.2 100 200 Production (Bn Pounds) US power generation moves to gas from coal, lowering GHG emissions Renewables have continued to grow, not Meanwhile, the EU moves in the opposite direction: crowded out by gas GHG (Bn tons/year) Coal consumption (Mn tons/year) 6.6 600 40% Coal 550 30% 6.2 GHG -13% Gas and coal in the Gas and coal European power mix in the US power mix 500 20% Gas 5.8 10% 450 Coal -21% Source: Pétrole et gaz informations N° 1831 5.4 400 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 1990 2012 BP outlook 2014 See also http://rhg.com/notes/neck-and-neck-us-and-european-ghg-emissions-trends 2. Some science about shale oil and gas Shale oil and gas are exactly the same products as oil and natural gas from conventional extraction. How oil & gas are formed Oil and gas are chemicals made just of two elements: carbon and hydrogen. The microscopic plants and animals that lived in the ocean millions of years ago sank to the bottom of the sea. Buried deeper and deeper under the surface of the earth, heat transformed them into hydrocarbons. Shale gas is natural gas! Shale oil and gas are exactly the same product as oil Land surface and natural gas from conventional extraction. The difference is the source: conventional exploits Overburden reservoir, shale exploits source rock Trap Conventional hydrocarbons are found in reservoirs: Reservoir 1. Coarse grains Seal 2. High permeability 3. Limited extension (at most as large as Greater London) Hydrocarbons migrate from source rock and are sometimes trapped in a reservoir Source rock Shale is found in the source rock: 1. Very fine grains 2. Very low permeability Basement 3. Very large extension (it could be as large as half of France) Technology made shale oil & gas economically viable Economic production Conventional Geologists have known about gas from shale Economic permeability for decades, but for Non economic production many years development was not economically viable. Shale oil & gas Economic production Uneconomic In the late 1990s, a permeability combination of two Non economic production proven technologies – horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing – and advanced IT made The first hydraulic fracturing happened in Oklahoma in 1947. gas from shale commercially viable. More than two million have been carried out by now in the US. Shale is normally at least 1,000 metres deeper than fresh water aquifers Multiple layers of steel and concrete isolate 0 m the well from the freshwater aquifers 500 Hydraulic fracturing happens thousands of metres underground. A fracture’s maximum diameter is about 1,000 600 metres. 1,500 Fracture profiles Aquifer of potable water 11 Eiffel towers 9 Eiffel towers 2,000 1000 After Warpinski et al Fracture tops (m) 2000 2,500 Depth Fracture bottoms 600 m 3000 Depth of fracturing stages 3,000 4000 6000 fracturation stages Life-cycle water usage and radioactivity Compared with conventional gas, shale gas requires only 1.7% additional water. Forbidden (>20) Industry can use fresh water, but also brackish and sea water. Full body scanner (10) Energy M3/MWh Nuclear 2.1 Admitted (<20) Coal 1.9 Gas 1 Shale gas 1.017 Advised (<1/yr) Water in storage before use Barnett (0.1/yr) RT Paris New-York (0.08) Living in a shale gas basin like the Barnett in the US exposes a person to as much radiation as flying a round trip from Paris to New York City. One medical scanner is equivalent to living for 100 years in the Barnett basin. Fracturing fluids are 90% water, 9% sand, 1% chemicals Sand 9% - 1,500 to 2,000 tons - Chemicals 0.5-1% keeps the fissures in the rocks open - used to viscosify The industry and allows the gas to flow to the well the fluid, remove voluntarily discloses bacteria and the chemicals it prevent corrosion uses for hydraulic fracturing in the EU: www.ngsfacts.org Additional information on chemical disclosure for Polish wells can be found at www.opppw.pl Water 90% - 10,000 to 20,000 m3/well (5 to 10 pools) - no need of high quality water: sea water or water from salted aquifers also works Produced water is handled carefully and can be reused 1. The water flowing back from the well to the surface is treated and it can be fully reused. 2. Treatment captures the methane mixed in the water, avoiding GHG Drilling + fracturing emissions. + logistics Fugitive emissions 7% 4% 3. The reduction of methane flaring and venting further Flaring Electrical 53% reduces GHG emissions. 36% & venting generation JA Costa (2011) Total , T. Stephenson (2012) IPIECA J. Broderick, et al (2012) Tyndall Centre University of Manchester Allen T et al (2013) Low footprint: a shale gas pad has the extension of two football fields Pad = 2 x 100 m Horizontal multifractured Dep Pad during drilling (lasts about 1 year) Solar panels Wind mills Source: Lane Energy, Poland To produce an equivalent amount of energy with wind mills or Pad in production (lasts about 20 years) solar panels, we would need 10 to 30 times the surface Source: Chesapeake http://zebu.uoregon.edu/disted/ph162/l4.html Earthquakes: less than the vibrations from a truck Source: International Gas Union Truck vibration Industrial activities induce low- intensity seismic events: • Mining, dams • Geothermal energy Blackpool* = 2.3 • Oil & gas extraction Hydraulic fracturing In shale gas, vibrations are * In 2011 there were small tremors at Preese Hall near Blackpool, UK, where hydraulic fracturing operations were taking place. generally lower than a truck passing by. The Paris metro vibrations are equivalent to 7 times Blackpool Shale is a global phenomenon! Shale gas Shale oil Notional additional resources Country Gas Oil Gboe Gboe Poland 25 3,3 Gboe Gbbl France 23 4,7 Conventional 1100 1650 Romania 9 0,3 Shale oil & gas 1200 350 Denmark 5 0 Additional (%) 110 20 UK 4 0,7 97 76 Netherlands 4 2,9 49 Others 9 1 Total 80 12,9 190 9 Source : EIA 2013 96 120 Russia Europe Canada 58 93 6 US 32 5,661 7,140 Algeria 13 China Mexico ? 42 74 2,587 Gas 136 5 18 Mature stage Brazil 66 314 Oil Australia Pilot stage 0 27 1,381 South Non-mature stage Africa Argentina The EU has potentially significant shale resources Europe’s shale gas resources are Main shale gas resource areas in Europe within the Top 10 worldwide Sources EIA 2014 Production could contribute to EU security of supply, employment, growth Benefits could be significant, even without being revolutionary Production (bcf/day) 20 4 daily French consumption 15 Shale gas boom In 2035, the EU is expected to import 10 2 daily French consumption 89% of its gas. Shale gas can cut that to as little as 62% 5 Some shale gas It could mean up to 1.1 million new 0 jobs created by 2050.
Recommended publications
  • The MOL Group Mitsui O.S.K

    The MOL Group Mitsui O.S.K

    Annual Report 2003 52 Mitsui O.S.K. Lines The MOL Group Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. As of March 31, 2003 ■ Consolidated Subsidiaries ● Subsidiaries Accounted for by the Equity Method ▲ Affiliated Companies Accounted for by the Equity Method Registered MOL’s Paid-in Capital Office Ownership (%)* (Thousands) Overseas Ship Operation/ ■ BGT related 11 companies Shipping Chartering ■ International Energy Transport Co., Ltd. Japan 56.23 ¥1,224,000 ■ International Marine Transport Co., Ltd. Japan 65.56 ¥500,000 ■ Mitsui O.S.K. Kinkai, Ltd. Japan 99.04 ¥660,000 ■ MCGC International Ltd. Bahamas 80.10 US$1 ■ Mitsui Kinkai Kisen Co., Ltd. Japan 74.83 ¥350,000 ■ Shipowner companies (170 companies) in Panama, Liberia, Cyprus, Malta, Hong Kong, Singapore ■ Tokyo Marine Co., Ltd. Japan 71.74 ¥617,500 ■ Tokyo Marine Asia Pte. Ltd. Singapore 100.00 S$500 ■ Unix Line Pte. Ltd. Singapore 100.00 S$500 ▲ Act Maritime Co., Ltd. Japan 49.00 ¥90,000 ▲ Aramo Shipping (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Singapore 50.00 US$17,047 ▲ Arun LNG Transport, Inc. Japan 35.00 ¥400,000 ▲ Asahi Tanker Co., Ltd. Japan 24.75 ¥400,272 ▲ Badak LNG Transport, Inc. Japan 25.00 ¥400,000 ▲ Belo Maritime Transport S.A. Panama 50.00 US$2 ▲ Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha Japan 20.97 ¥13,258,410 ▲ Faship Maritime Carriers Inc. Panama 50.00 US$1,200 ▲ Gearbulk Holding Ltd. Bermuda 40.00 US$260,000 ▲ Global Alliance K B.V. Netherlands 25.00 DGL8,000 ▲ Golden Sea Carrier Inc. Liberia 50.00 US$2,420 ▲ Interasia Lines, Ltd. Japan 43.81 ¥400,000 ▲ Jasmin Shipping (Tokyo) Corporation Japan 50.00 ¥10,000 ▲ Liquimarine Gandria Chartering Co., Ltd.
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer

    U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer

    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.

  • Oil Shale and Tar Sands

    Fundamentals of Materials for Energy and Environmental Sustainability Editors David S. Ginley and David Cahen Oil shale and tar sands James W. Bunger 11 JWBA, Inc., Energy Technology and Engineering, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 11.1 Focus 11.2 Synopsis Tar sands and oil shale are “uncon- Oil shale and tar sands occur in dozens of countries around the world. With in-place ventional” oil resources. Unconven- resources totaling at least 4 trillion barrels (bbl), they exceed the world's remaining tional oil resources are characterized petroleum reserves, which are probably less than 2 trillion bbl. As petroleum becomes by their solid, or near-solid, state harder to produce, oil shale and tar sands are finding economic and thermodynamic under reservoir conditions, which parity with petroleum. Thermodynamic parity, e.g., similarity in the energy cost requires new, and sometimes of producing energy, is a key indicator of economic competitiveness. unproven, technology for their Oil is being produced on a large commercial scale by Canada from tar sands, recovery. For tar sands the hydrocar- and to a lesser extent by Venezuela. The USA now imports well over 2 million barrels bon is a highly viscous bitumen; for of oil per day from Canada, the majority of which is produced from tar sands. oil shale, it is a solid hydrocarbon Production of oil from oil shale is occurring in Estonia, China, and Brazil albeit on called “kerogen.” Unconventional smaller scales. Importantly, the USA is the largest holder of oil-shale resources. oil resources are found in greater For that reason alone, and because of the growing need for imports in the USA, quantities than conventional petrol- oil shale will receive greater development attention as petroleum supplies dwindle.
  • Hess Corporation Is a Leading Global Independent Energy Company Engaged in the Exploration and Production of Crude Oil and Natural Gas

    Hess Corporation Is a Leading Global Independent Energy Company Engaged in the Exploration and Production of Crude Oil and Natural Gas

    2017 ANNUAL REPORT Table of Contents 1 Financial and Operating Highlights 2 Letter to Shareholders 5 Global Operations 9 Sustainability 12 Board of Directors and Corporate Officers Our Company Hess Corporation is a leading global independent energy company engaged in the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. We are committed to meeting the highest standards of corporate citizenship by protecting the health and safety of our employees, safeguarding the environment and making a positive impact on the communities in which we do business. Cover: Drilling Operations, North Dakota Financial and Operating Highlights HESS CORPORATION Amounts in millions, except per share data Financial — for the year 2017 2016 Sales and other operating revenues $ 5,466 $ 4,762 Net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation $ (4,074) $ (6,132) Net income (loss) per share diluted (a) $ (13.12) $ (19.92) Common stock dividends per share $ 1.00 $ 1.00 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 945 $ 795 E&P capital and exploratory expenditures $ 2,047 $ 1,871 Midstream capital expenditures $ 121 $ 283 Weighted average diluted shares outstanding 314.1 309.9 Financial — at year end 2017 2016 Total assets $ 23,112 $ 28,621 Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,847 $ 2,732 Total debt $ 6,977 $ 6,806 Total equity $ 12,354 $ 15,591 Debt to capitalization ratio (b) 36.1% 30.4% Common stock price $ 47.47 $ 62.29 Operating — for the year 2017 2016 Net production Crude oil and natural gas liquids (thousands of barrels per day) United States 153 165 International 66 70 Total 219 235 Natural gas (thousands of MCF per day) United States 211 258 International 309 265 Total 520 523 Barrels of oil equivalent (thousands of barrels per day) 306 322 (a) Calculated as net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation less preferred stock dividends as applicable, divided by weighted average number of diluted shares.
  • Oil Refining in Mexico and Prospects for the Energy Reform

    Oil Refining in Mexico and Prospects for the Energy Reform

    Articles Oil refining in Mexico and prospects for the Energy Reform Daniel Romo1 1National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico. E-mail address: [email protected] Abstract: This paper analyzes the conditions facing the oil refining industry in Mexico and the factors that shaped its overhaul in the context of the 2013 Energy Reform. To do so, the paper examines the main challenges that refining companies must tackle to stay in the market, evaluating the specific cases of the United States and Canada. Similarly, it offers a diagnosis of refining in Mexico, identifying its principal determinants in order to, finally, analyze its prospects, considering the role of private initiatives in the open market, as well as Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex), as a placeholder in those areas where private enterprises do not participate. Key Words: Oil, refining, Energy Reform, global market, energy consumption, investment Date received: February 26, 2016 Date accepted: July 11, 2016 INTRODUCTION At the end of 2013, the refining market was one of stark contrasts. On the one hand, the supply of heavy products in the domestic market proved adequate, with excessive volumes of fuel oil. On the other, the gas and diesel oil demand could not be met with production by Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex). The possibility to expand the infrastructure was jeopardized, as the new refinery project in Tula, Hidalgo was put on hold and the plan was made to retrofit the units in Tula, Salamanca, and Salina Cruz. This situation constrained Pemex's supply capacity in subsequent years and made the country reliant on imports to supply the domestic market.
  • To Arrive at the Total Scores, Each Company Is Marked out of 10 Across

    To Arrive at the Total Scores, Each Company Is Marked out of 10 Across

    BRITAIN’S MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES THE RESULTS 17th last year as it continues to do well in the growing LNG business, especially in Australia and Brazil. Veteran chief executive Frank Chapman is due to step down in the new year, and in October a row about overstated reserves hit the share price. Some pundits To arrive at the total scores, each company is reckon BG could become a take over target as a result. The biggest climber in the top 10 this year is marked out of 10 across nine criteria, such as quality Petrofac, up to fifth from 68th last year. The oilfield of management, value as a long-term investment, services group may not be as well known as some, but it is doing great business all the same. Its boss, Syrian- financial soundness and capacity to innovate. Here born Ayman Asfari, is one of the growing band of are the top 10 firms by these individual measures wealthy foreign entrepreneurs who choose to make London their operating base and home, to the benefit of both the Exchequer and the employment figures. In fourth place is Rolls-Royce, one of BMAC’s most Financial value as a long-term community and environmental soundness investment responsibility consistent high performers. Hardly a year goes past that it does not feature in the upper reaches of our table, 1= Rightmove 9.00 1 Diageo 8.61 1 Co-operative Bank 8.00 and it has topped its sector – aero and defence engi- 1= Rotork 9.00 2 Berkeley Group 8.40 2 BASF (UK & Ireland) 7.61 neering – for a decade.
  • Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report

    Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report

    Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report Partners XxxxContents Introduction 3 Five key findings 5 Key finding 1: Staying within 1.5°C means companies must 6 keep oil and gas in the ground Key finding 2: Smoke and mirrors: companies are deflecting 8 attention from their inaction and ineffective climate strategies Key finding 3: Greatest contributors to climate change show 11 limited recognition of emissions responsibility through targets and planning Key finding 4: Empty promises: companies’ capital 12 expenditure in low-carbon technologies not nearly enough Key finding 5:National oil companies: big emissions, 16 little transparency, virtually no accountability Ranking 19 Module Summaries 25 Module 1: Targets 25 Module 2: Material Investment 28 Module 3: Intangible Investment 31 Module 4: Sold Products 32 Module 5: Management 34 Module 6: Supplier Engagement 37 Module 7: Client Engagement 39 Module 8: Policy Engagement 41 Module 9: Business Model 43 CLIMATE AND ENERGY BENCHMARK IN OIL AND GAS - INSIGHTS REPORT 2 Introduction Our world needs a major decarbonisation and energy transformation to WBA’s Climate and Energy Benchmark measures and ranks the world’s prevent the climate crisis we’re facing and meet the Paris Agreement goal 100 most influential oil and gas companies on their low-carbon transition. of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Without urgent climate action, we will The Oil and Gas Benchmark is the first comprehensive assessment experience more extreme weather events, rising sea levels and immense of companies in the oil and gas sector using the International Energy negative impacts on ecosystems.
  • Statoil ASA Statoil Petroleum AS

    Statoil ASA Statoil Petroleum AS

    Offering Circular A9.4.1.1 Statoil ASA (incorporated with limited liability in the Kingdom of Norway) Notes issued under the programme may be unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by Statoil Petroleum AS (incorporated with limited liability in the Kingdom of Norway) €20,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme On 21 March 1997, Statoil ASA (the Issuer) entered into a Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the Programme) and issued an Offering Circular on that date describing the Programme. The Programme has been subsequently amended and updated. This Offering Circular supersedes any previous dated offering circulars. Any Notes (as defined below) issued under the Programme on or after the date of this Offering Circular are issued subject to the provisions described herein. This does not affect any Notes issued prior to the date hereof. Under this Programme, Statoil ASA may from time to time issue notes (the Notes) denominated in any currency agreed between the Issuer and the relevant Dealer (as defined below). The Notes may be issued in bearer form or in uncertificated book entry form (VPS Notes) settled through the Norwegian Central Securities Depositary, Verdipapirsentralen ASA (the VPS). The maximum aggregate nominal amount of all Notes from time to time outstanding will not exceed €20,000,000,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies calculated as described herein). The payments of all amounts due in respect of the Notes issued by the Issuer may be unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by Statoil A6.1 Petroleum AS (the Guarantor). The Notes may be issued on a continuing basis to one or more of the Dealers specified on page 6 and any additional Dealer appointed under the Programme from time to time, which appointment may be for a specific issue or on an ongoing basis (each a Dealer and together the Dealers).
  • High Level Framework for Process Safety Management

    High Level Framework for Process Safety Management

    High level framework for process safety management IMPORTANT: This file is subject to a licence agreement issued by the Energy Institute, London, UK. All rights reserved. It may only be used in accordance with the licence terms and conditions. It must not be forwarded to, or stored or accessed by, any unauthorised user. Enquiries: e: [email protected] t: +44 (0)207 467 7100 HIGH LEVEL FRAMEWORK FOR PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT 1st edition December 2010 Published by ENERGY INSTITUTE, LONDON The Energy Institute is a professional membership body incorporated by Royal Charter 2003 Registered charity number 1097899 IMPORTANT: This file is subject to a licence agreement issued by the Energy Institute, London, UK. All rights reserved. It may only be used in accordance with the licence terms and conditions. It must not be forwarded to, or stored or accessed by, any unauthorised user. Enquiries: e: [email protected] t: +44 (0)207 467 7100 The Energy Institute (EI) is the leading chartered professional membership body supporting individuals and organisations across the energy industry. With a combined membership of over 13 500 individuals and 300 companies in 100 countries, it provides an independent focal point for the energy community and a powerful voice to engage business and industry, government, academia and the public internationally. As a Royal Charter organisation, the EI offers professional recognition and sustains personal career development through the accreditation and delivery of training courses, conferences and publications and networking opportunities. It also runs a highly valued technical work programme, comprising original independent research and investigations, and the provision of EI technical publications to provide the international industry with information and guidance on key current and future issues.
  • BP Code of Conduct – English

    BP Code of Conduct – English

    Our Code Our responsibility Code of Conduct Guiding you to make the right decisions Our values and behaviours are the foundation of our Code What we value Safety Safety is good business. Everything we do relies upon the safety of our workforce and the communities around us. We care about the safe management of the environment. We are committed to safely delivering energy to the world. Respect We respect the world in which we operate. It begins with compliance with laws and regulations. We hold ourselves to the highest ethical standards and behave in ways that earn the trust of others. We depend on the relationships we have and respect each other and those we work with. We value diversity of people and thought. We care about the consequences of our decisions, large and small, on those around us. Excellence We are in a hazardous business and are committed to excellence through the systematic and disciplined management of our operations. We follow and uphold the rules and standards we set for our company. We commit to quality outcomes, have a thirst to learn and to improve. If something is not right, we correct it. Courage What we do is rarely easy. Achieving the best outcomes often requires the courage to face difficulty, to speak up and stand by what we believe. We always strive to do the right thing. We explore new ways of thinking and are unafraid to ask for help. We are honest with ourselves and actively seek feedback from others. We aim for an enduring legacy, despite the short-term priorities of our world.
  • Case No COMP/M.7579 - ROYAL DUTCH SHELL / KEELE OY / AVIATION FUEL SERVICES NORWAY

    Case No COMP/M.7579 - ROYAL DUTCH SHELL / KEELE OY / AVIATION FUEL SERVICES NORWAY

    EN Case No COMP/M.7579 - ROYAL DUTCH SHELL / KEELE OY / AVIATION FUEL SERVICES NORWAY Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/06/2015 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32015M7579 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.6.2015 C(2015) 4285 final In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article PUBLIC VERSION 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a MERGER PROCEDURE general description. To the notifying parties Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Case M.7579 - ROYAL DUTCH SHELL / KEELE OY / AVIATION FUEL SERVICES NORWAY Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 139/20041 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area2 (1) On 12th May 2015, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article (4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which Shell Exploration and Production Holding B.V. ("SEPH", the Netherlands), ultimately controlled by Royal Dutch Shell plc ("RDS", England), and St1 Group Oy and St1 Nordic Oy (collectively, "St1", Finland) both controlled by Keele Oy, will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Aviation Fuelling Services Norway AS ("AFSN" or "JV", Norway), currently a 100% subsidiary of SEPH, by way of purchase of 1 OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p.
  • The West African Oil & Gas Market 2013-2023

    The West African Oil & Gas Market 2013-2023

    The West African Oil & Gas Market 2013-2023 Table 4.28 Exploration Fields that Gabon Oil Company is Involved in Fields Operator MAGHENA Addax AGALI Anadarko NKANI Atas E2 Eni D3 Eni D4 Eni F2 Eni F3 Eni F7 Eni EPAEMENO GGPC EOV GGPC DUSSAFU Harvest ETEKAMBA Maurel & Prom OMOUEYI Maurel & Prom NYANGA MAYOMBE Maurel & Prom KARI Maurel & Prom MOABI MPDC NGUMA MPDC SHAKTHI Oil India MBELI Ophir Gabon NTSINA Ophir Gabon MANGA Ophir Gabon GNONDO Ophir Gabon NZIEMBOU Perenco OGUEYI Perenco DE 7 Perenco AROUWE Perenco DUSSAFU Sasol IGOUMOU MARIN Shell Gabon BC9 Shell Gabon BCD10 Shell Gabon SALSICH Sino Gabon LOTUS Sinopec MBINDA Total Gabon ALOUMBE Total Gabon DIABA Total Gabon AZOBE Tullow Oil AKOUM Tullow Oil KIARSSENY Tullow Oil Source: Gabon Oil Company 4.7.5.3 Prospects for Pre-Salt Development As with Angola and several other West African countries, the rapid development of Brazil’s pre-salt formations has sparked considerable interest in the prospects for Gabon’s pre-salt regions, which were part of the same prehistoric supercontinent, Pangea. Gabon’s pre-salt regions had been www.visiongain.com Page 99 The West African Oil & Gas Market 2013-2023 4.8 Republic of the Congo Oil & Gas Market Forecast 2013-2023 Table 4.31, Figure 4.32 and Figure 4.33 show visiongain’s forecast for Republic of Congo’s oil & gas market over the next ten years. Table 4.31 Republic of the Congo Oil & Gas Market Forecast 2013-2023 ($bn, AGR %, CAGR%, Cumulative) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2013-23 Capex $bn 1.55 1.70 2.57 4.15 4.55 2.70 2.50 1.80 1.87 2.10 2.40 2.80 29.14 AGR (%) 9.8 50.9 61.6 9.6 -40.7 -7.4 -28.0 3.9 12.3 14.3 16.7 CAGR (%) 2013-18 8.0 2018-23 2.3 CAGR (%) 2013-23 5.1 Source: Visiongain 2013 Figure 4.32 Republic of the Congo Oil & Gas Market Forecast 2013-2023 ($bn, AGR%) 5.0 80% 4.5 60% 4.0 3.5 40% 3.0 20% 2.5 $Bn AGR 0% 2.0 1.5 -20% 1.0 -40% 0.5 0.0 -60% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Year Source: Visiongain 2013 www.visiongain.com Page 103 The West African Oil & Gas Market 2013-2023 6.