RAPE MYTHS in the LOCAL and NATIONAL NEWSPAPER COVERAGE of the BROCK TURNER CASE by Juana Campos a Thesis Submitted to the Depar
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Running head: RAPE MYTHS IN THE NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF THE BROCK TURNER CASE RAPE MYTHS IN THE LOCAL AND NATIONAL NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF THE BROCK TURNER CASE by Juana Campos A thesis submitted to the Department of Sociology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Sociology Chair of Committee: Samantha S. Kwan, Ph.D. Committee Member: Amanda Baumle, Ph.D. Committee Member: Jennifer Arney, Ph.D. University of Houston December 2020 RAPE MYTHS IN THE NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF THE BROCK TURNER CASE Copyright 2020, Juana Campos ii RAPE MYTHS IN THE NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF THE BROCK TURNER CASE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Samantha Kwan not only for her expertise and feedback but also for her understanding, empathy, and support during rough times. Without her guidance, I don’t think I could have pushed through to finish these last steps in my thesis. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Amanda Baumle and Dr. Jennifer Arney for their time, patience, and feedback. For funding, I would like to thank the Department of Women and Gender Studies for awarding me the Blanche Epsy Chenoweth Graduate Fellowship. I would also like to the Department of Sociology for awarding me their Department Research Grant. Their funding made it possible for me to fund my education and the additional coder. Last but certainly not least, I am thankful for the generous support from my friends and family. Thank you for lending me your wifi and your support. iii RAPE MYTHS IN THE NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF THE BROCK TURNER CASE ABSTRACT Rape myths are false claims that pardon perpetrators, blame victims, and justify sexual assault. They are invoked when a case of sexual assault deviates from the socially constructed definition of “real rape,” in which a deranged man attacks an innocent woman despite her physical resistance. When characteristics or actions by the victim and perpetrator defy this definition, the victim can be held responsible. Rape myths help their endorsers explain and distance themselves from sexual assault. Previous studies focusing on high profile sexual assault cases found rape myths in the print media coverage of such cases. My study focuses on the Brock Turner case. Turner, a white Stanford student athlete, was found guilty of sexually assaulting an intoxicated and unconscious Emily Doe. He successfully used Doe’s intoxication, sexual history, apparel, and partying history to excuse his behavior. Because rape myths surfaced during the trial, they may surface in the media coverage of this case. Specifically, I examined rape myths in the reporting of this case in newspapers (n=50). Using a quantitative coding scheme, I documented the prevalence of these myths and how often journalists criticized these myths. Research shows when journalists report on cases of sexual assault, they often frame stories in which the victim is to blame. In the newspaper coverage of the Brock Turner case, 68 percent of articles contained at least one rape myth. The most prevalent rape myth was “rape is insignificant” (54 percent). The myth to receive the most criticism was “rape is insignificant” (60 percent). Keywords: content analysis; news media; quantitative; rape myths; sexual assault iv RAPE MYTHS IN THE NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF THE BROCK TURNER CASE TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... III Abstract .................................................................................................................................. IV List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... VI I. Introduction (Rape Myths in the Local and National Newspaper Coverage of the Brock Turner Case) .................................................................................................................1 II. Literature Review ...............................................................................................................6 Sexual Scripts, Real Rape, and Rape Myths ...................................................................................... 6 Rape Myths in the Media ................................................................................................................. 10 III. Methods ............................................................................................................................16 Sample .............................................................................................................................................. 16 Prevalence......................................................................................................................................... 19 Variables Coded ............................................................................................................................... 19 Rape Myths about the Victim ...................................................................................................... 19 Rape Myths about the Perpetrator ............................................................................................... 21 Journalist Endorsement/Condemnation ........................................................................................ 21 Measures of Portrayal ................................................................................................................... 21 Article Characteristics .................................................................................................................. 22 Coding and Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 23 Process of Coding ........................................................................................................................ 23 Reliability .................................................................................................................................... 23 Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 24 Research Questions ..................................................................................................................... 24 IV. Results ...............................................................................................................................25 Information about Journalists ........................................................................................................... 25 Prevalence of Rape Myths ................................................................................................................ 26 Measures of Portrayal .............................................................................................................. 29 Commentary on Rape Myths ............................................................................................................ 29 IV. Discussion .........................................................................................................................32 Limitations ........................................................................................................................................ 36 Future Research ................................................................................................................................ 37 References ...............................................................................................................................40 Appendix Codebook ................................................................................................................................51 Tables ......................................................................................................................................66 v RAPE MYTHS IN THE NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF THE BROCK TURNER CASE LIST OF TABLES I. Prevalence of Rape Myths Across All Variables .............................................................66 II. Measures of Portrayal Across All Articles .....................................................................67 III. Commentary on Rape Myths Across All Articles ........................................................68 vi RAPE MYTHS IN THE NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF THE BROCK TURNER CASE Rape Myths in the Local and National Newspaper Coverage of the Brock Turner Case In the early morning of January 18, 2015, two students found Brock Turner penetrating an unconscious and half naked Emily Doe1 behind a dumpster on the Stanford University campus.2 Turner is a white man in his early twenties with an upper middle-class upbringing. At the time of the incident, he was a Stanford student and an award-winning swimmer. Doe, a white woman3 in her early twenties had recently graduated college and was spending time with her younger sister at the same party Turner attended prior to the assault. When the two students approached the scene, Turner bolted but eventually was restrained by the two students until police arrived and took him into custody. The victim awoke three hours later in a gurney in a hospital hallway, unaware of the sexual assault. On February 2, 2015, Turner was indicted on five charges. Though two charges (one count of sexual penetration by a foreign object of an intoxicated woman and one count of sexual penetration by a foreign object of an unconscious woman) were dropped in October 2015, Turner was found guilty on three