DOCSLIB.ORG

Deliverable Transmittal and Tracking Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deliverable Transmittal and Tracking Form Project 2005-USGS-552-P Final Report for Effectiveness Monitoring of Springfed Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Treatments: Progressive Management of Invasive Tamarisk in the Southern Nevada Region Submitted by: Tom Dudley, Research Biologist Marine Science Institute, University of California Santa Barbara & Dept. of Natural Resource and Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno Co-Principal Investigator: Matthew Brooks, Research Botanist US Geological Survey, Western Ecological Science Center, Yosemite Field Station, El Portal, CA Co-operating Researchers: 1 2 1,3 4 5 5,6 Kumud Acharya , Dan Bean , Benjamin Conrad , Curt Deuser , Gail Drus , Michael Kuehn , Iwona Kuczynska5, Kevin Hultine7, J. R. Matchett8, Steven M. Ostoja8, Susan Roberts8 1Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV 2Colorado Department of Agriculture,, Palisade, CO 3University of Nevada, Las Vegas 4National Park Service, Lake Mead National Recreation Area 5University of California Santa Barbara 6Western Foundation for Vertebrate Zoology, Camarillo, CA 7Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 8USGS Western Ecological Research Center (WRRC), El Portal/Bishop, CA 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE 1. Effectiveness Monitoring of Tamarisk Treatments 12 SECTION I An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Tamarisk Control as a Riparian Restoration Treatment: 12 Case study A. – Floodplain Riparian/Virgin River; 24 Case Study B. – Spring-fed Upland Seeps and Springs 31 SECTION II Avian Response to Tamarisk Removal on the Virgin River 43 Covered and Special Status Avian Species OBJECTIVE 2. Tamarisk and Fire 45 SECTION III Wildfire in Tamarix-invaded Desert Riparian Areas 46 Sub-Section III-A. Regional Survey of Tamarisk-Fire Relations 51 Sub-Section III-B. Tamarisk Condition and Flammability OBJECTIVE 3. Tamarisk Mortality Following Fire 65 Sub-Section III-C. Fire and Tamarisk Mortality 67 Overall Conclusions – Tamarisk and Fire OBJECTIVE 4. Effectiveness of Treatments for Secondary Weeds 68 SECTION IV Effectiveness of herbicide treatments for control of Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens) as a secondary invasive weed in southern Nevada OBJECTIVE 5. Effectiveness Monitoring of Tamarisk Treatments: Biological Control 74 SECTION V Monitoring Biological Control of Tamarisk 74 Section V-A Documenting the Tamarisk Biocontrol Process in Clark County and the Virgin River Watershed 87 Section V-B Other Elements related to Tamarisk Biocontrol 89 Section V-C Temperature Effects on Life History Traits of Diorhabda carinulata 98 Section V-D Rapid Evolution of Phenology and Range Expansion of an Introduced Insect 106 GENERAL DISCUSSION 115 Restoration for Endangered Species Habitat 123 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 124 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 125 REFERENCES 137 APPENDIX 1 Tamarisk versus Native Plants as Breeding Habitat for Birds - Potential Impacts of Biocontrol on the Avian Community 158 APPENDIX 2 Bats Associated with Vegetation Types and Implications of Biocontrol 155 APPENDIX 3 Effects of Tamarisk Biocontrol on Evapotranspiration and Water Resources 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Effective management of non-native plant invasions that threaten native vegetation and associated wildlife species depends on control treatments that provide sustained weed reduction and facilitate their replacement with self-replicating native and/or beneficial non-native plants. This research project involved an Effectiveness Monitoring assessment of riparian locations in which actions to control invasive weeds, particularly tamarisk but including other noxious taxa, have been applied in Clark County and adjacent regions. Research was to characterize and evaluate control methods (chemical and mechanical treatments, fire, biological) to determine management approaches that yielded, or will yield, desired results (recovery of native vegetation and wildlife habitat, improved substrate condition, reduced wildfire risk) while resisting re-invasion by secondary noxious weeds. The effects of simulated biological control of tamarisk were to be addressed as part of the original project to understand the potential impacts and responses when and if biocontrol agents were introduced into Clark County. However, the unanticipated introduction of the tamarisk leaf beetle, Diorhabda carinulata, into the project area during the course of this research provided the opportunity and need to evaluate biological control as a weed management method and its potential to facilitate ecosystem recovery from exotic species invasion, and subsequent improvement of habitat for Covered and other riparian dependent species. Goal and Objectives of the Project Thus, the Goal of this multi-agency research program was to promote adaptive weed management that provides optimal, cost-effective weed control with a minimum of collateral impacts to associated beneficial species, and integrates ecosystem functions into the habitat recovery process. The overall Objective was to undertake an extensive evaluation of regional infestation sites, those where tamarisk has been treated and those where treatments were anticipated, to understand the underlying interrelationships among species and environmental processes, including physical disturbance, fire (natural and prescribed), and hydrologic conditions. The specific Objectives of the research project are as follows: 1. Conduct a multivariate study evaluating relationships among current tamarisk dominance, dominance of other non-native and native plant species, wildlife habitat structure and wildlife associations, tamarisk control treatments, fire, and other environmental variables to assess effectiveness of weed control and riparian vegetation restoration treatments. 2. Compare vegetation structure and composition, and tamarisk flammability in relation to foliage condition, in response to experimental herbicide treatments to simulate anticipated defoliation effects of tamarisk biocontrol. 3. Compare mortality of tamarisk following fire with and without previous herbicide treatments. 4. Evaluate herbicide and cultural treatments for the control of Russian knapweed, a recent invasive species that responds positively to disturbance and may function as a surrogate for treatment of other secondary weed invasions. 2 5. Monitor dispersal and establishment of the tamarisk leaf beetle, document life cycles, genetic changes, and factors that may limit its establishment (predation, premature winter diapause, extreme temperatures); assess effects of this biological control agent on tamarisk condition, defoliation-re- growth dynamics and responses by associated vegetation and wildlife to tamarisk defoliation; evaluate fire risk dynamics related to defoliation. Vegetation Responses to Treatments (Objective 1) This multi-disciplinary project encompassed several research elements, the primary objective targeting vegetation responses to prior tamarisk control treatments carried out by NPS and BLM during the prior decade in floodplain systems, particularly the Virgin River, and in regional upland spring wetlands. Primary findings were that the tamarisk control treatments in floodplains have been effective in significantly and strongly reducing tamarisk stem densities and vegetative cover (from 25% to 1.3% total woody plant cover) compared with untreated control sites, and opening the canopy with much greater areal cover of open space (45% vs. 5% as expected less than 5 years following mechanical treatments. These reductions in tamarisk cover are associated with significant increases in diversity (53 vs. 32 species) and vegetative cover of native shrub and tree species, although herbaceous species did not show significant differences in density nor cover. However, the physical disturbance associated with these treatments also promoted invasion and/or expansion of weedy plant species such as Russian thistle (tumbleweed; Salsola tragus) that can interfere with native plant recruitment, and provide poor habitat for wildlife. Some non-native species, particularly grasses (Bromus spp. and Schismus barbatus), were more common in association with tamarisk in untreated areas so treatments can reduce multiple invasive species. In upland spring sites, time since treatment has a major role in promoting tamarisk reduction and native woody plant increases. Sites initially treated >6 years prior to surveys had lower tamarisk density and cover than more recently treated sites, primarily because NPS policy is to return to sites for follow-up treatments. Native woody plants showed minor enhancement over time, while herbaceous species were significantly more abundant in relation to time since initial treatment. These results indicate that traditional methods of tamarisk removal have mixed effects. They have been effective in meeting some objectives, particularly increasing diversity and abundance of native plants, as well as reducing the likelihood of wildfire (sparser distribution of plant biomass, or ‘fuels’ in treated area) [Fuels management was the primary driver of weed control/restoration treatments in non-NPS locations.] However, a general conclusion is that conventional treatments have the undesirable effect of increasing the abundance of other noxious, non-native species that can interfere with native vegetation recovery. Ecosystems managed for invasive plant control will need repeated attention, and probably active restoration of important taxa, to eventually reach to goal of sustainably increasing native species abundances and diversity in Clark County wetlands. Restoration
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nuisance Insects and Climate Change
    www.defra.gov.uk Nuisance Insects and Climate Change March 2009 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Tel: 020 7238 6000 Website: www.defra.gov.uk © Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO 2007 This publication is value added. If you wish to re-use this material, please apply for a Click-Use Licence for value added material at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/value-added-licence- information/index.htm. Alternatively applications can be sent to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ; Fax: +44 (0)1603 723000; email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Local Environment Protection Defra Nobel House Area 2A 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Email: [email protected] This document is also available on the Defra website and has been prepared by Centre of Ecology and Hydrology. Published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 2 An Investigation into the Potential for New and Existing Species of Insect with the Potential to Cause Statutory Nuisance to Occur in the UK as a Result of Current and Predicted Climate Change Roy, H.E.1, Beckmann, B.C.1, Comont, R.F.1, Hails, R.S.1, Harrington, R.2, Medlock, J.3, Purse, B.1, Shortall, C.R.2 1Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, 2Rothamsted Research, 3Health Protection Agency March 2009 3 Contents Summary 5 1.0 Background 6 1.1 Consortium to perform the work 7 1.2 Objectives 7 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Psocoptera (Insecta) from the Sierra Tarahumara, Chihuahua
    Anales del Instituto de Biología. Serie Zoología ISSN: 0368-8720 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México García ALDRETE, Alfonso N. Psocoptera (Insecta) from the Sierra Tarahumara, Chihuahua, Mexico Anales del Instituto de Biología. Serie Zoología, vol. 73, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, 2002, pp. 145-156 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45873202 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Zoología 73(2): 145-156. 2002 Psocoptera (Insecta) from the Sierra Tarahumara, Chihuahua, Mexico ALFONSO N. GARCÍA ALDRETE* Abstract. Results of a survey of the Psocoptera of the Sierra Tarahumara, con- ducted from 14-20 June, 2002, are here presented. 33 species, in 17 genera and 12 families were collected; 17 species have not been described. 17 species are represented by 1-3 individuals, and 22 species were found each in only one collecting locality. It was estimated that from 10 to 12 more species may occur in the area. Fishers Alpha Diversity Index gave a value of 9.01. Only one species of Psocoptera had been recorded previously in the area. This study rises to 37 the species of Psocoptera known in the state of Chihuahua . Key words: Psocoptera, Tarahumara, Chihuahua, Mexico. Resumen. Se presentan los resultados de un censo de insectos del orden Psocoptera, efectuado del 14 al 20 de junio de 2002 en la Sierra Tarahumara, en el que se obtuvieron 33 especies, en 17 géneros y 12 familias; 17 de las especies encontradas son nuevas, 17 especies están representadas por 1-3 individuos y 22 especies se encontraron sólo en sendas localidades.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Mantodea (Insecta), with a Review of Aspects of Functional Morphology and Biology
    aua o ew eaa Ramsay, G. W. 1990: Mantodea (Insecta), with a review of aspects of functional morphology and biology. Fauna of New Zealand 19, 96 pp. Editorial Advisory Group (aoimes mae o a oaioa asis MEMBERS AT DSIR PLANT PROTECTION Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa Ex officio ieco — M ogwo eae Sysemaics Gou — M S ugae Co-opted from within Systematics Group Dr B. A ooway Κ Cosy UIESIIES EESEAIE R. M. Emeso Eomoogy eame ico Uiesiy Caeuy ew eaa MUSEUMS EESEAIE M R. L. ama aua isoy Ui aioa Museum o iae ag Weigo ew eaa OESEAS REPRESENTATIVE J. F. awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy GO o 1700, Caea Ciy AC 2601, Ausaia Series Editor M C ua Sysemaics Gou SI a oecio Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa aua o ew eaa Number 19 Maoea (Iseca wi a eiew o asecs o ucioa mooogy a ioogy G W Ramsay SI a oecio M Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa emoa us wig mooogy eosigma cooaio siuaio acousic sesiiiy eece eaiou egeeaio eaio aasiism aoogy a ie Caaoguig-i-uicaio ciaio AMSAY GW Maoea (Iseca – Weigo SI uisig 199 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533 ; o 19 IS -77-51-1 I ie II Seies UC 59575(931 Date of publication: see cover of subsequent numbers Suggese om o ciaio amsay GW 199 Maoea (Iseca wi a eiew o asecs o ucioa mooogy a ioogy Fauna of New Zealand [no.] 19. —— Fauna o New Zealand is eae o uicaio y e Seies Eio usig comue- ase e ocessig ayou a ase ie ecoogy e Eioia Aisoy Gou a e Seies Eio ackowege e oowig co-oeaio SI UISIG awco – sueisio o oucio a isiuio M C Maews – assisace wi oucio a makeig Ms A Wig – assisace wi uiciy a isiuio MOU AE ESEAC CEE SI Miss M oy
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Metallyticus Reviewed (Insecta: Mantodea)
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228623877 The genus Metallyticus reviewed (Insecta: Mantodea) Article · September 2008 CITATIONS READS 11 353 1 author: Frank Wieland Pfalzmuseum für Naturkunde - POLLICHIA-… 33 PUBLICATIONS 113 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Frank Wieland letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 24 October 2016 Species, Phylogeny and Evolution 1, 3 (30.9.2008): 147-170. The genus Metallyticus reviewed (Insecta: Mantodea) Frank Wieland Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institut für Zoologie & Anthropologie und Zoologisches Museum der Georg-August-Universität, Abteilung für Morphologie, Systematik und Evolutionsbiologie, Berliner Str. 28, 37073 Göttingen, Germany [[email protected]] Abstract Metallyticus Westwood, 1835 (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea) is one of the most fascinating praying mantids but little is known of its biology. Several morphological traits are plesiomorphic, such as the short prothorax, characters of the wing venation and possibly also the lack of discoidal spines on the fore femora. On the other hand, Metallyticus has autapomor- phies which are unique among extant Mantodea, such as the iridescent bluish-green body coloration and the enlargement of the first posteroventral spine of the fore femora. The present publication reviews our knowledge of Metallyticus thus providing a basis for further research. Data on 115 Metallyticus specimens are gathered and interpreted. The Latin original descriptions of the five Metallyticus species known to date, as well as additional descriptions and a key to species level that were originally published by Giglio-Tos (1927) in French, are translated into English.
    [Show full text]
  • Verdura® Native Planting
    Abronia maritime Abronia maritima is a species of sand verbena known by the common name red (Coastal) sand verbena. This is a beach-adapted perennial plant native to the coastlines of southern California, including the Channel Islands, and northern Baja California. Abronia villosa Abronia villosa is a species of sand-verbena known by the common name desert (Inland) sand-verbena. It is native to the deserts of the southwestern United States and northern Mexico and the southern California and Baja coast. Adenostoma Adenostoma fasciculatum (chamise or greasewood) is a flowering plant native to fasciculatum California and northern Baja California. This shrub is one of the most widespread (Coastal/Inland) plants of the chaparral biome. Adenostoma fasciculatum is an evergreen shrub growing to 4m tall, with dry-looking stick-like branches. The leaves are small, 4– 10 mm long and 1mm broad with a pointed apex, and sprout in clusters from the branches. Arctostaphylos Arctostaphylos uva-ursi is a plant species of the genus Arctostaphylos (manzanita). uva-ursi Its common names include kinnikinnick and pinemat manzanita, and it is one of (Coastal/Inland) several related species referred to as bearberry. Arctostaphylos Arctostaphylos edmundsii, with the common name Little Sur manzanita, is a edmundsii species of manzanita. This shrub is endemic to California where it grows on the (Coastal/Inland) coastal bluffs of Monterey County. Arctostaphylos Arctostaphylos hookeri is a species of manzanita known by the common name hookeri Hooker's manzanita. Arctostaphylos hookeri is a low shrub which is variable in (Coastal/Inland) appearance and has several subspecies. The Arctostaphylos hookeri shrub is endemic to California where its native range extends from the coastal San Francisco Bay Area to the Central Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Psocoptera: Liposcelididae, Trogiidae)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2015 Evaluation of Potential Attractants for Six Species of Stored- Product Psocids (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae, Trogiidae) John Diaz-Montano USDA-ARS, [email protected] James F. Campbell USDA-ARS, [email protected] Thomas W. Phillips Kansas State University, [email protected] James E. Throne USDA-ARS, Manhattan, KS, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Diaz-Montano, John; Campbell, James F.; Phillips, Thomas W.; and Throne, James E., "Evaluation of Potential Attractants for Six Species of Stored- Product Psocids (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae, Trogiidae)" (2015). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 2048. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/2048 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. STORED-PRODUCT Evaluation of Potential Attractants for Six Species of Stored- Product Psocids (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae, Trogiidae) 1,2 1 3 JOHN DIAZ-MONTANO, JAMES F. CAMPBELL, THOMAS W. PHILLIPS, AND JAMES E. THRONE1,4 J. Econ. Entomol. 108(3): 1398–1407 (2015); DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov028 ABSTRACT Psocids have emerged as worldwide pests of stored commodities during the past two decades, and are difficult to control with conventional management tactics such as chemical insecticides.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhoppers of Minnesota
    Technical Bulletin 155 June 1942 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Accepted for publication June 19, 1942 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 3 Sources of material 4 Systematic treatment 4 Eurymelinae 6 Macropsinae 12 Agalliinae 22 Bythoscopinae 25 Penthimiinae 26 Gyponinae 26 Ledrinae 31 Amblycephalinae 31 Evacanthinae 37 Aphrodinae 38 Dorydiinae 40 Jassinae 43 Athysaninae 43 Balcluthinae 120 Cicadellinae 122 Literature cited 163 Plates 171 Index of plant names 190 Index of leafhopper names 190 2M-6-42 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota John T. Medler INTRODUCTION HIS bulletin attempts to present as accurate and complete a T guide to the leafhoppers of Minnesota as possible within the limits of the material available for study. It is realized that cer- tain groups could not be treated completely because of the lack of available material. Nevertheless, it is hoped that in its present form this treatise will serve as a convenient and useful manual for the systematic and economic worker concerned with the forms of the upper Mississippi Valley. In all cases a reference to the original description of the species and genus is given. Keys are included for the separation of species, genera, and supergeneric groups. In addition to the keys a brief diagnostic description of the important characters of each species is given. Extended descriptions or long lists of references have been omitted since citations to this literature are available from other sources if ac- tually needed (Van Duzee, 1917).
    [Show full text]
  • Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a Resource for Taxonomy and Biodiversity Conservation in the Mediterranean Region
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 597:Barcoding 27–38 (2016) Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation... 27 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.597.7241 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region Giulia Magoga1,*, Davide Sassi2, Mauro Daccordi3, Carlo Leonardi4, Mostafa Mirzaei5, Renato Regalin6, Giuseppe Lozzia7, Matteo Montagna7,* 1 Via Ronche di Sopra 21, 31046 Oderzo, Italy 2 Centro di Entomologia Alpina–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 3 Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, 37129 Verona, Italy 4 Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italy 5 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources–University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran 6 Dipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione e l’Ambiente–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy Corresponding authors: Matteo Montagna ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Santiago-Blay | Received 20 November 2015 | Accepted 30 January 2016 | Published 9 June 2016 http://zoobank.org/4D7CCA18-26C4-47B0-9239-42C5F75E5F42 Citation: Magoga G, Sassi D, Daccordi M, Leonardi C, Mirzaei M, Regalin R, Lozzia G, Montagna M (2016) Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys 597: 27–38. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.597.7241 Abstract The Mediterranean Region is one of the world’s biodiversity hot-spots, which is also characterized by high level of endemism.
    [Show full text]
  • 10A General Pest Control Study Guide
    GENERAL PEST CONTROL CATEGORY 10A A Study Guide for Commercial Applicators July 2009 - Ohio Department of Agriculture - Pesticide and Fertilizer Regulation - Certifi cation and Training General Pest Control A Guide for Commercial Applicators Category 10a Editor: Diana Roll Certification and Training Manager Pesticide and Fertilizer Regulation Ohio Department of Agriculture Technical Consultants: Members of the Ohio Pest Management Association Robert DeVeny Pesticide Control Inspector - ODA Tim Hoffman Pesticide Control Inspector - ODA Proofreading Specialist: Kelly Boubary and Stephanie Boyd Plant Industry Ohio Department of Agriculture Images on front and back covers courtesy of Jane Kennedy, Office Manager - Pesticide Regulation - Ohio Department of Agriculture ii Acknowledgements The Ohio Department of Agriculture would like to thank the following universities, colleges, and private industries for the use of information needed to create the Study Guide. Without the expertise and generosity of these entities, this study would not be possible. The Ohio Department of Agriculture would like to acknowledge and thank: The Ohio State University – Dr. Susan Jones, Dr. David Shetlar, Dr. William Lyon The University of Kentucky – Dr. Mike Potter Penn State University – Department of Entomology Harvard University – Environmental Health & Safety Varment Guard Environmental Services, Inc. – Pest Library University of Nebraska – Lincoln – Department of Entomology Cornell – Department of Entomology Washington State University – Department of Entomology Ohio Department of Natural Resources – Wildlife The Internet Center for Wildlife Damage Management – Publications University of Florida – Department of Entomology University of California – IPM Online iii INTRODUCTION How to Use This Manual This manual contains the information needed to become a licensed commercial applicator in Category 10a, General Pest Control.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Clickbook Booklet
    183 Liliaceae Yucca brevifolia joshua tree 5 184 Liliaceae Yucca schidigera Mohave yucca 99 1 Flora of New Dixie Mine Road Area, west of Landers Achnatherum 185 Poaceae ~ desert needlegrass 20 2 # Plants speciosum # JM Family ID? Scientific Name (*)Common Name Bloom #Vch six-weeks Obs'd 186 Poaceae Aristida adscensionis 50 99 22Oct10 three-awn 1 Pteridaceae Cheilanthes covillei beady lipfern 1 Aristida purpurea var. 187 Poaceae ssp Nealley three-awn 1 1 4 nealleyi Pentagramma 2 Pteridaceae ~ triangularis ssp. goldback fern 1 Bouteloua barbata var. 188 Poaceae six-weeks grama 20 50 10 triangularis barbata 3 Cupressaceae Juniperus californica California juniper 1 Bromus madritensis ssp. 189 Poaceae *red brome 99 2 rubens 4 Ephedraceae Ephedra californica desert tea 30 1 190 Poaceae Bromus trinii *Chilean chess 3 5 Ephedraceae Ephedra nevadensis Nevada ephedra 3 191 Poaceae Distichlis spicata saltgrass 1 6 Ephedraceae Ephedra viridis green ephedra 1 Elymus elymoides ssp. 7 Pinaceae Pinus monophylla pinyon pine 2 192 Poaceae squirreltail 2 elymoides 8 Amaranthaceae Amaranthus fimbriatus fringed amaranth 99 99 11 193 Poaceae Erioneuron pulchellum fluff grass 25 9 Apiaceae Lomatium mohavense Mojave lomatium 1 Hordeum vulgare var. 194 Poaceae *cultivated barley 1 Acamptopappus trifurcatum 10 Asteraceae ~ sphaerocephalus var. goldenhead 5 3 195 Poaceae Melica frutescens tall melica 2 sphaerocephalus 196 Poaceae Melica imperfecta coast-range melic 3 11 Asteraceae Adenophyllum cooperi Cooper's dogweed 5 20 2 197 Poaceae Muhlenbergia rigens deergrass 2 12 Asteraceae Ambrosia acanthicarpa bur-ragweed 1 198 Poaceae Pleuraphis rigida big galleta 10 99 11 13 Asteraceae Ambrosia dumosa burroweed 5 99 12 Poa secunda ssp.
    [Show full text]