Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 33

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 33 Transportation Energy Data Book Quick Facts Petroleum • The U.S. produces 10 million barrels of petroleum per day (M bpd), or 12% of the world’s 85.35M bpd. • The U.S. consumes 18.6 M bpd, or 21% of the world’s 88.3 M bpd. • U.S. transportation petroleum use is 67% of total U.S. petroleum use. • U.S. transportation petroleum use is 126% of total U.S. petroleum production. • Petroleum comprises 92% of U.S. transportation energy use. • Cars and light trucks account for 63% of U.S. transportation petroleum use. • Medium trucks (Class 3-6) account for 4% of U.S. transportation petroleum use. • Heavy trucks (Class 7-8) account for 17% of U.S. transportation petroleum use. Energy • U.S. transportation energy use accounts for 28% of total U.S. energy use. • In 2011, 98% of ethanol consumed in the U.S. is consumed as ethanol in gasohol (E10). • Cars and light trucks account for 59% of U.S. transportation energy use. • Medium trucks account for 5% of U.S. transportation energy use. • Heavy trucks account for 17% of U.S. transportation energy use. Light Vehicle Characteristics • There are 111,290 cars and 120,847 light trucks in the U.S. (232,137 total light vehicles). • U.S. cars: o 7,586,000 cars were sold in 2013. o The average age of a U.S. car is 11.4 years; the average car lifetime is 16.9 years. o The average fuel economy for the U.S. car fleet (all cars on the road today) is 24.9 mpg. o Cars comprise 50% of new light vehicle sales. • U.S. light trucks: o 7,693,000 light trucks were sold in 2013. o The average age of a U.S. light truck is 11.3 years; the average light truck lifetime is 15.5 years. o The average fuel economy for the U.S. light truck fleet (all light trucks on the road today) is 18.5 mpg. o Light trucks comprise 50% of new light vehicle sales. • There were 8,716,720 fleet vehicles in 2013: 4,438,330 cars and 4,278,390 trucks. • U.S. car registrations account for 16% of total world car registrations. • U.S. truck and bus registrations account for 38% of total world truck and bus registrations. • The average U.S. household vehicle travels 11,300 miles per year (2009 NHTS). Heavy Truck Characteristics • 10,659,000 heavy trucks were registered in the U.S. in 2012. • In 2002 (the last time a survey was conducted), heavy trucks accounted for 80% of medium and heavy truck fuel use. Note: Data are for calendar year 2012 or 2013 unless otherwise noted. ORNL-6990 (Edition 33 of ORNL-5198) Center for Transportation Analysis Energy and Transportation Science Division TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DATA BOOK: EDITION 33 Stacy C. Davis Susan W. Diegel Oak Ridge National Laboratory Robert G. Boundy Roltek, Inc. July 2014 Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 33 can be found online at: cta.ornl.gov/data Prepared for the Vehicle Technologies Office Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Prepared by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6073 Managed by UT-BATTELLE, LLC for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge: Website: http://www.osti.gov/bridge Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone: 703-605-6000 (1-800-553-6847) TDD: 703-487-4639 Fax: 703-605-6900 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.ntis.gov/support/ordernowabout.htm Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) representatives, and International Nuclear Information System (INIS) representatives from the following source: Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone: 865-576-8401 Fax: 865-576-5728 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Users of the Transportation Energy Data Book are encouraged to comment on errors, omissions, emphases, and organization of this report to one of the persons listed below. Requests for additional complementary copies of this report, additional data, or information on an existing table should be referred to Ms. Stacy Davis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Stacy C. Davis Oak Ridge National Laboratory National Transportation Research Center 2360 Cherahala Boulevard Knoxville, Tennessee 37932 Telephone: (865) 946-1256 FAX: (865) 946-1314 E-mail: [email protected] Website Location: cta.ornl.gov/data Jacob W. Ward Vehicle Technologies Office Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Department of Energy, EE-2G Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585 Telephone: (202) 586-7606 FAX: (202) 586-1600 E-mail: [email protected] Website Location: vehicles.energy.gov Spreadsheets of the tables in the Transportation Energy Data Book can be found on the web at: cta.ornl.gov/data Find useful data and information in other U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Data Books. Vehicle Technologies Market Report: cta.ornl.gov/vtmarketreport Biomass Energy Data Book: cta.ornl.gov/bedb Buildings Energy Data Book: www.btscoredatabook.net Hydrogen Data Book: hydrogen.pnl.gov/cocoon/morf/hydrogen/article/103 v TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................... xix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................... xxi ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... xxiii INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................xxv CHAPTER 1 PETROLEUM ................................................................................................1–1 Table 1.1 Proved Reserves of Crude Oil and Natural Gas, 1980–2012............................1–2 Table 1.2 World Crude Oil Production, 1960–2013 .........................................................1–3 Table 1.3 World Petroleum Production, 1973–2013 ........................................................1–4 Table 1.4 World Petroleum Consumption, 1960–2012 ....................................................1–5 Figure 1.1 World Oil Reserves, Production and Consumption, 2012 ................................1–6 Table 1.5 World Oil Reserves, Production and Consumption, 2012 ................................1–6 Figure 1.2 World Natural Gas Reserves, Production and Consumption, 2012 .................1–7 Table 1.6 World Natural Gas Reserves, Production and Consumption, 2012 ..................1–7 Table 1.7 U.S. Petroleum Imports, 1960–2013.................................................................1–8 Table 1.8 Imported Crude Oil by Country of Origin, 1973-2013 .....................................1–9 Table 1.9 Crude Oil Supplies, 1973-2013.......................................................................1–10 Figure 1.3 Oil Price and Economic Growth, 1970–2013.................................................1–11 Figure 1.4 Costs of Oil Dependence to the U.S. Economy, 1970–2012 ...........................1–12 Figure 1.5 Refinery Gross Output by World Region, 2003 and 2013 ..............................1–13 Table 1.10 U.S. Refinery Input of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, 1987–2012.........1–14 Table 1.11 U.S. Refinery Yield of Petroleum Products from a Barrel of Crude Oil, 1978–2013.......................................................................................................1–15 Table 1.12 United States Petroleum Production, Imports and Exports, 1950–2013 ........1–16 TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DATA BOOK: EDITION 33—2014 vi Table 1.13 Petroleum Production and Transportation Petroleum Consumption in Context, 1950–2013 ........................................................................................1–17 Figure 1.6 United States Petroleum Production and Consumption – All Sectors, 1973–2040.......................................................................................................1–18 Figure 1.7 United States Petroleum Production, and Transportation Consumption, 1970–2040.......................................................................................................1–19 Table 1.14 Consumption of Petroleum by End-Use Sector, 1973–2013 ..........................1–20 Table 1.15 Highway Transportation Petroleum Consumption by Mode, 1970–2012 ......1–21 Table 1.16 Nonhighway Transportation Petroleum Consumption by Mode, 1970–2012.......................................................................................................1–22
Recommended publications
  • CATA Assessment of Articulated Bus Utilization
    (Page left intentionally blank) Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................... E-1 Literature Review ................................................................................................................................................................................................................E-1 Operating Environment Review ........................................................................................................................................................................................E-1 Peer Community and Best Practices Review...................................................................................................................................................................E-2 Review of Policies and Procedures and Service Recommendations ...........................................................................................................................E-2 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Best Practices in Operations ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Integration into the Existing Fleet ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ulmer Park Depot Brooklyn Ny 11214
    Ulmer park depot brooklyn ny 11214 Continue From CPTDB Wiki Jump to Navigation Skip to search for the following is a list of bus depots used by the Metropolitan Transport Authority. Legend of the Agency: LIB - MTA Long Island Bus MTAB - MTA Bus Company NYCT - MTA New York Transit Current Depot Address Fleet, Notes Agency Amsterdam 1381 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027 See notes Manhattan, NYT Only stores some of the vintage buses preserved by the New York Transit Museum. 114-15 Baisley Park Blvd., Jamaica, NY 11434 MCI D4500 MCI D4500CL New Leaf XD60 OBI Orion VII HEV (07.501) Queens, MTAB Former Jamaica Bus Lines Garage. Casey Steadell 123-53 Roosevelt Aven, Corona, New Flyer XD40 New Resident XD60 OBI Orion VII NG HEV (07.501) Queens, NYCT formerly called Flushing Depot. Castleton Depot 1390 Castleton Ave., Staten Island, NY 10310 MCI D4500CT NOVA bus LFS OBI Orion VII EPA10 (07.501) Pre-X3-45 Staten Island, New York Charleston 4700 Arthur Kills Rd., Staten Island, NY 10309 MCI D4500CL MCI D4500CT NOVA Bus LFS Prevost X3-45 Staten Island, NYCT College Point 128-15 28th Ave., Purge, NY 11354 MCI D4500 MCI D4500CL New Flyer C40 Queens , MTAB former Queens Surface Garage. East New York 1 Jamaica, Brooklyn, New Volatile 11207 OBI Orion VII HEV (07.501) OBI Orion VII NG HEV (07.501) Brooklyn, NYCT Eastchester 3320 Tillotson Ave., Bronx, NY 10475 MCI D4500 MCI D4500CL OBI Orion VII NG HEV (07.501) Bronx, MTAB former bus garage line. Far Rockaway 49-19 Rockaway Beach Blvd., Far Rockaway, NY 11691 MCI D4500CL New Leaf XD60 OBI Orion VII HEV (07.501) Queens, MTAB Former Lines of Green Bus Lines Garage.
    [Show full text]
  • New NCAA Transportation Program Worries Operators INDIANAPOLIS — Only Mo- GO Ground Options — Is Aimed at Transportation for Financial Rea- Letes Is Its Main Concern
    December 1, 2010 New NCAA transportation program worries operators INDIANAPOLIS — Only mo- GO Ground Options — is aimed at transportation for financial rea- letes is its main concern. higher level,” the release said. torcoach operators with top-rated providing the safest travel possible sons and a number of them – Ohio “The NCAA is adopting a new NCAA spokesman Cameron safety records and safety programs for student athletics who are invit- State, Michigan State, San Jose and higher standard for safety Schuh said the association had will be allowed to transport college ed to playoff and championship State, UCLA, Alabama, and Ne- compliance and certification of been reviewing transportation is- athletic teams to post-season games the association sponsors. braska among them – were hiring charter bus operations,” the orga- sues for quite some time and want- games under a program adopted by Adoption of the program came carriers with questionable safety nization said in a release posted on ed to develop a ground transporta- the National Collegiate Athletic in the wake of an extensive investi- records. its website that provides some de- tion program similar to one it has Association. gation last year by ESPN, the sport While it was not known if the tails about the program. for air travel. The NCAA said the new cable television network, that ESPN investigation was behind the “Those operators who wish to “We believe this opportunity ground transportation program — showed that numerous colleges new program, the NCAA did say transport teams involved in cham- will allow us to enhance the safety being managed by Chicago-based have been switching to charter bus that the safety of the student ath- pionships must be certified at this CONTINUED ON PAGE 10 c Berg tarnished industry, Olympics dispute say Northwest operators resolved, payout SEATTLE — When Darren Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Move to Zero
    Move to Zero Natural Gas Engines for Bus Cummins Westport natural gas engines offer near-zero emissions, reliability, and performance for transit, shuttle bus, school bus, and coach applications. Available factory-direct from leading vehicle manufacturers, they combine the advantages of clean-burning, low-cost natural gas with the power and torque you need for your fleet. Why choose natural gas for your bus fleet? Advanced Engine Technology & Performance Cummins Westport B6.7N, L9N, and ISX12N introduce the next generation of low- emission natural gas engine technology, offering improvements to performance, durability, and diagnostics. Leveraging the experience gained from over 80,000 engines in service, Cummins Westport 2018 engines deliver performance you can rely on. Near-Zero Emissions Today Natural gas is a low-carbon, domestically abundant fuel source. Cummins Westport engines offer 50–90% fewer NOx emissions than the current standard, and meet EPA greenhouse gas emission requirements. They operate on compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG) or renewable natural gas (RNG). Cost Effective & Sustainable Natural gas engines offer the most cost-effective emissions reduction option for customers today. Lower fuel costs and long-term natural gas price stability can result in substantial fuel savings for high-mileage fleets. Incentive funding is also available in some regions. See www.cumminswestport.com/incentives for more information. Available Ratings with Horsepower & Peak Torque SCHOOL & TRANSIT BUS COMMUTER MOTORCOACH SHUTTLE BUS COACH 200–240 hp NOx emissions: 0.1 g / bhp-hr. 520–560 lb-ft (50% below EPA) 250–300 hp 280–320 hp NOx emissions: 0.02 g / bhp-hr.
    [Show full text]
  • Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2019 Final Report
    Fredericton on the Move Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2019 Final Report Prepared for Fredericton Transit Prepared by Stantec January 2019 Final Report Fredericton on the Move Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2019 January 7, 2019 Prepared for: Fredericton Transit Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Transit Advisory TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION REVIEW 5 1.3 MARKET CONDITIONS 11 1.4 SYSTEM COMPARISON 26 1.5 ROUTE PERFORMANCE 35 2.0 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 40 2.1 STAKEHOLDER ACTIVITIES 40 2.2 PREVALENT THEMES AND CONCERNS 43 2.3 SURVEY RESULTS 44 3.0 GAPS ANALYSIS 56 3.1 SERVICE PLANNING AND OPERATIONS 56 3.2 TECHNOLOGY 56 3.3 FARES 57 3.4 PARTNERSHIPS 58 3.5 MARKETING 59 3.6 FLEET 59 4.0 SERVICE PLANNING AND OPERATIONS 61 4.1 CURRENT NETWORK 61 4.2 NORTH SIDE HUB EVALUATION 65 4.3 PARK-AND-RIDE EVALUATION 72 4.4 SUNDAY SERVICE EVALUATION 83 4.5 ROUTING EVALUATION 94 5.0 TECHNOLOGY 114 5.1 CURRENT TECHNOLOGY APPROACH 114 5.2 FUTURE TECHNOLOGY PROSPECTS 116 5.3 TECHNOLOGY RECOMMENDATIONS 122 6.0 FARES 127 6.1 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE 127 6.2 FARE PROSPECTS 135 6.3 FARE RECOMMENDATIONS 142 7.0 PARTNERSHIPS 147 7.1 CURRENT PARTNERSHIPS 147 7.2 PARTNERSHIP PROSPECTS 147 7.3 PARTNERSHIPS RECOMMENDATION 150 8.0 MARKETING 151 8.1 CURRENT MARKETING APPROACH 151 8.2 MARKETING PROSPECTS 154 8.3 MARKETING RECOMMENDATIONS 160 9.0 FLEET 162 9.1 CURRENT FLEET 162 9.2 FLEET PROSPECTS 162 9.3 FLEET RECOMMENDATIONS 164 9.4 FACILITY CONSIDERATIONS 167 10.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 169 10.1 ABOUT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 169 10.2 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA RECOMMENDATIONS 174 11.0 MOVING FORWARD 175 11.1 SUMMARY OF SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (0-2 YEARS) 175 11.2 SUMMARY OF MEDIUM-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (3-5 YEARS) 177 11.3 SUMMARY OF LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (5+ YEARS) 179 12.0 APPENDICES 183 12.1 THE NORTH AMERICAN BUS MARKET 183 12.2 FREDERICTON TRANSIT SURVEY QUESTIONS 189 FIGURES Figure 1 City wards of Fredericton.
    [Show full text]
  • MTA 2020-2024 Capital Program
    DRAFT MTA Capital Program Rebuilding New York’s Transportation 2020-2024 System CAPITAL PROGRAM As Proposed to the MTA Board September 25, 2019 new.mta.info/2020CapitalProgram As Proposed to the CPRB October 1, 2019 MTA Capital Program Rebuilding New York’s Transportation 2020-2024 System CAPITAL As Proposed to the MTA Board September 25, 2019 PROGRAM As Proposed to the CPRB October 1, 2019 new.mta.info/2020CapitalProgram 1 It’s Time to Re-invest in New York’s Transportation System. Hello New York, As the new Chairman and Delivering a transportation system worthy of the 21st CEO of the MTA, and – more century and beyond will require more than an ambitious importantly – a lifelong rider Capital Plan. Our transit revitalization efforts will be and daily customer of our bolstered by major initiatives to transform the MTA into system, I am pleased to present a world-class organization that provides its customers the proposed 2020-2024 MTA with the service they deserve. The MTA’s Transformation Capital Program. This historic and transformational Plan, approved by the Board in July 2019, outlines plan is the largest ever, outlining unprecedented levels a path to bring truly innovative and meaningful reform of investment across all of the MTA’s assets, from to the agency. Transformation priorities include subways, buses and railroads to bridges and tunnels. improving overall service through business efficiencies, This program represents a bold vision for what it will driving clearer lines of accountability, ending cost take to deliver the world-class transit system New York overruns and project delays, and reducing waste deserves.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CANADIAN BUS INDUSTRY and Its RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
    TP 13947E THE CANADIAN BUS INDUSTRY and its RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT NEEDS JUNE 2002 TP 13947E THE CANADIAN BUS INDUSTRY and its RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT NEEDS by C.H. (Chris) Prentice, IBI Group Robert Tremblay, Cohésion RC Inc. JUNE 2002 This report reflects the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the Transportation Development Centre of Transport Canada or the sponsoring organizations. The Transportation Development Centre does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are essential to its objectives. Since the accepted measures in the industry are both imperial and metric, both measures appear in this report. Unless stated otherwise, all monetary values are in Canadian dollars. Project Team C. H. (Chris) Prentice, Project Leader, IBI Group Robert Tremblay, ing., Consultant, Cohésion RC Inc. Un sommaire français se trouve avant la table des matières. ii Transport Transports Canada Canada PUBLICATION DATA FORM 1. Transport Canada Publication No. 2. Project No. 3. Recipient’s Catalogue No. TP 13947E 5144 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Publication Date The Canadian Bus Industry and Its Research and Development Needs June 2002 6. Performing Organization Document No. 7. Author(s) 8. Transport Canada File No. C.H. Prentice and Robert Tremblay ZCD2450-D-742 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. PWGSC File No. IBI Group MTB-0-01096 230 Richmond Street West, 5th Floor Toronto, Ontario 11. PWGSC or Transport Canada Contract No. Canada M5V 1V6 T8200-011517/001/MTB 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Publication and Period Covered Transportation Development Centre (TDC) Final 800 René Lévesque Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Chain Assessment
    DOCKETED Docket Number: 19-IEPR-04 Project Title: Transportation TN #: 228787-13 Document Title: US Department of Energy - Supply Chain Assessment - May 2019 Class 3-8 Hybrid and Electric Vehicles Operating on North American Description: Roads: Supply Chain Assessment of Vehicles, Drive-Train Motors, Inverters, Converters and Batteries Filer: Wendell Krell Organization: California Energy Commission Submitter Role: Commission Staff Submission Date: 6/19/2019 9:22:42 AM Docketed Date: 6/19/2019 Open Source Intelligence for Better Decisions. Class 3-8 Hybrid and Electric Vehicles Operating on North American Roads: Supply Chain Assessment of Vehicles, Drive-Train Motors, Inverters, Converters and Batteries. *** Prepared for the US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office. Approved for Public Release Please contact Mr. Steven Boyd, Vehicle Technologies Office, US Department of Energy at ([email protected]), or Mr. Chris Whaling, Synthesis Partners, LLC at ([email protected]), with questions or comments. Publication Date: May 2019 Collection cut-off date: July 30, 2018 Contract No. DE-DT0006388 Synthesis Partners, LLC www.synthesispartners.com Open Source Intelligence for Better Decisions. This page intentionally left blank. May 2019 www.synthesispartners.com 2 Open Source Intelligence for Better Decisions. Acknowledgements The Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO) provided funding for this work under contract number DE- DT0006388. We provide special thanks to Mr. Steven Boyd, Technology Development Manager, for his technical guidance and management of this effort. We also would like to thank Ms. Adrienne Riggi, Contracting Officer at the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) for her technical oversight of this effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Mar-Apr 2013
    RUN 02·13 CTA 4319 Desplaines and Court 1 A 4333 Washington and Desplaines Welcome to. another issue of The Green Pennant needs the surplus property, which had been used to Special, the official publication of The Omnibus Society locate construction equipment during the Brown Line of America. project. Through this publication we hope to keep our readers The Brown Line expansion was completed in 2009 and informed of events happening in the transit industry in included the renovation of 18 train stations and full Chicago and other cities in the United States. accessibility for each station, as well as longer platforms and necessary related infrastructure investments to Visit the Omnibus Society of America website at support growing ridership on the Brown Line. osabus.org. At osabus.org we will be posting upcoming fan trips and meetings information, as well as The properties were sold because neither is critical to membership information. CTA operations. Please visit our site when you have a chance and give CTA customers to get fresh, made-to- us your opinions and comments. order meals from new rail station • MARIAPR MEETINGS cafes The March meeting of the Omnibus Society of America 1/11/2013 will be held on March 1, 2013, in the Anderson Pavilion The Chicago Transit Board today approved two leases of Swedish Covenant Hospital, 2751 W. Winona to Butterfield Kitchen for cafes at the Roosevelt station Avenue, Chicago, Illinois. The meeting will start at 7:30 serving the Orange, Green and Red Lines and the pm. Jefferson Park Blue Line station, giving CT A customers Our program for the evening will be a digital movie the ability to pick up made-to-order breakfast, lunch and presentation by Bruce Moffat.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Transit in Southeast Queens Upgrading Public Transportation in One of New York City’S Most Isolated Areas
    Improving Transit in Southeast Queens Upgrading Public Transportation in One of New York City’s Most Isolated Areas Thomas Dorante Fordham University April 28, 2016 Dorante 1 Introduction In the years of 1929 and 1939, the New York City Board of Transportation (predecessor to the New York City Transit Authority) released major expansion plans for the city’s young subway system. The ambitious plans, now collectively referred to as the IND Second System, proposed to construct numerous new subway lines and extensions of lines already built or then­under construction, stretching through all five boroughs to the city limits. In 1940, the city’s three transit companies (the Interborough Rapid Transit Corporation or IRT, the Brooklyn­Manhattan Transit Corporation or BMT, and the city­owned Independent Subway System or IND) were brought under collective municipal operation, unifying the subway and elevated rail networks, the depleted streetcar system, and the growing omnibus network created to replace the trolley lines. Unification was anticipated to streamline the construction of the new rapid transit lines, which would then lead to development booms in many distant neighborhoods, particularly in the outer boroughs. Most of the Second System routes, however, went unbuilt, derailed by the Great Depression and World War II. The next major plan, the Program for Action in 1968, was largely shelved due to the 1970s fiscal crisis, constructing only two short subway segments and several unused tunnels for the Second Avenue Subway in a span of over thirty years. Fast­forward to 2016 and the environment for transportation expansion has largely changed. Most of the subway system was completed by the 1950s, built when neighborhoods were sparsely inhabited, and construction was not hindered by safety concerns, labor rights, and disturbances to existing infrastructure, or by NIMBYism and other forms of community opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Transexpo 2016 - Nowe Trendy Na Rynku Autobusowym (Cz
    Zbigniew Rusak Transexpo 2016 - nowe trendy na rynku autobusowym (cz. 1) Widok na halę E, która zgromadziła liderów polskiego rynku autobusowego oraz producentów nowoczesnych systemów elektroniki pokładowej Targi Transportu Zbiorowego TRANSEXPO, zorganizowane w Częstochowie, która skutkuje nakładaniem kar umownych, w dniach 11–13 października 2016 r. przez Targi Kielce wspól- powodują, że przyszłość tej firmy nie rysuje się w różowych ko- nie z Izbą Gospodarczą Komunikacji Miejskiej oraz Polską Izbą lorach. Oczywiście rynek nie znosi próżni i na przejęcie części Transportu Samochodowego i Spedycji, to największa tego typu rynku zajmowanej przez firmę z Solca Kujawskiego czatuje już impreza w Polsce i w Europie Centralnej. W niniejszym artykule reaktywowany Autosan, który w Kielcach pokazał m.in. gazową scharakteryzowano autobusy eksponowane podczas 13. edycji odmianę Sancity LF. targów Transexpo. W Kielcach 24 producentów i ich polskich przedstawicieli poka- zało łącznie 72 autobusy, w tym 32 miejskie oraz 40 międzymia- stowych i turystycznych. Niewątpliwie największą grupę stanowi- Na ponad 10 tys. m2 powierzchni swoje wyroby zaprezentowało ły minibusy, których łącznie pokazano 26. Stanowiły one 36,7% 164 wystawców, w tym 36 firm zagranicznych z 11 krajów eu- prezentowanych pojazdów. Liczba ta odpowiada w przybliżeniu ropejskich. Wystawę odwiedziło ponad 5,5 tys. zwiedzających, udziałowi tej grupy pojazdów w ogólnej sprzedaży autobusów na czyli o 22% więcej niż 2 lata temu. Należy przyznać, że przejście polskim rynku. Większość z nich to konstrukcje budowane na ba- na dwuletni cykl organizacji targów przyniosło pozytywne efekty zie samochodów dostawczych Mercedes-Benz Sprinter oraz Iveco w postaci nie tylko większej liczby zwiedzających, lecz również Daily m.in. przez polskie spółki AutoCuby, Automet, CMS-Auto, większej liczby wystawców (+26%) i powierzchni wystawowej Mercusa i Kapenę, czeską SKP, włoską Iveco oraz białoruską (+58%).
    [Show full text]
  • Bus & Motorcoach News
    BUS & MOTORCOACH NEWS February— February 1, 1, 2005 2005 — 1 INDUSTRY NEWS OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF MOTORCOACH EXPO 2005 Passenger carriers face tough battle with new Congress WASHINGTON — The mo- the United Motorcoach Associa- torcoach industry and its private- tion, the American Bus Associa- sector passenger transportation tion, the National School Trans- partners appear to be facing long portation Association and about a odds in their bid to make critical dozen other national, regional and changes to the stalled federal high- state passenger transportation asso- way and public transportation reau- ciations. The associations not only thorization bill. represent bus operators but also Members of the Coalition of school bus companies, paratransit Private Transportation Associa- services, and taxicab, shuttle and tions met late last month with key limousine operators. staff members from the House and The group was organized last Greyhound cuts move to Southwest Senate, and the meetings were less year to fight for the inclusion of a than encouraging. half-dozen provisions in the federal DALLAS — The overhaul of added in the next couple of The eastern half of the U.S. is In fact, the coalition’s meeting highway and public transit reautho- Greyhound Lines’ route structure months as the company winds due for the same type of system with top staffers from the House rization bills being considered by moved into the Southwest, West down phase one of its massive revamping, although the company Transportation and Infrastructure the House and Senate. Generally, and other regions this month with cost-cutting effort, according to says it has not yet developed a Committee was “fairly negative in the coalition has been battling to: abandonments announced for 68 Greyhound Vice President of timetable for phase two.
    [Show full text]