DOCSLIB.ORG

VERTEBRATE PALAEONTOLOGY Dedicated to Mary, Philippa and Donald for Their Forebearance While I Wrote This Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VERTEBRATE PALAEONTOLOGY Dedicated to Mary, Philippa and Donald for Their Forebearance While I Wrote This Book VERTEBRATE PALAEONTOLOGY Dedicated to Mary, Philippa and Donald for their forebearance while I wrote this book. VERTEBRATE PALAEONTOLOGY Fourth edition MICHAEL J. BENTON School of Earth Sciences University of Bristol Bristol, UK Chapter opening illustrations drawn by John Sibbick This edition first published 2015 © 2015 Michael J. Benton Third edition published 2005 © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Second edition published 1997 by Chapman & Hall. First edition published 1990 by Unwin Hyman. Registered Office John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Editorial Offices 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774, USA For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell. The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author(s) have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Benton, M. J. (Michael J.) Vertebrate palaeontology / Michael J. Benton. – Fourth edition. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-118-40755-4 (cloth) – ISBN 978-1-118-40684-7 (pbk.) 1. Vertebrates, Fossil. I. Title. QE841.B44 2015 566–dc23 2014000064 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books. Cover image: Lobster lunch of Luoping; over a muddy seabed during the Middle Triassic (Ansian) at the future site of Luoping County, Yunnan. In the foreground, an early rock lobster (Yunnanopalinura schrami) attracts the unwanted attention of the coelacanth Luopingcoelacanthus eurylacrimalis and the armoured reptile Sinosaurosphargis yunguiensis. Behind them cruise other aquatic reptiles: the ichthyosaurs Mixosaurus cf. panxianensis and the little pachypleurosaur Dianopachysaurus dingi. Swarming around is a diverse community of actinopterygians: ubiquitous Sangiorgioichthys sui (numerous fish with black-tipped fins), sleek Sinosaurichthys longimedialis (thin with a long snout), tiny Marcopoloichthys ani (very small with red-spotted fins), scaleless Gymnoichthys inopinatus (blue with a yellow back) and the deep-bodied Kyphosichthys grandei (brown and yellow) and Luoxiongichthys hyperdorsalis (black and white). Painting by Brian Choo © 2013. Set in 9.5/12pt Minion by SPi Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India 1 2015 Contents LIST OF BOXES viii 3.1 Cambrian vertebrates 46 PREFACE x 3.2 Vertebrate hard tissues 49 ABOUT THE COMPANION WEBSITE xii 3.3 The jawless fishes 51 3.4 Origin of jaws and gnathostome relationships 59 3.5 Placoderms: armour-plated monsters 60 1 VERTEBRATES ORIGINATE 1 3.6 Chondrichthyes: the first sharks 65 3.7 Acanthodians: the ‘spiny skins’ 65 Key questions in this chapter 2 3.8 Devonian environments 67 Introduction 2 3.9 Osteichthyes: the bony fishes 70 1.1 Sea squirts and the lancelet 2 3.10 Early fish evolution and mass extinction 79 1.2 Ambulacraria: echinoderms and hemichordates 4 3.11 Further reading 79 1.3 Deuterostome relationships 6 Questions for future research 80 1.4 Chordate origins 8 3.12 References 80 1.5 Vertebrates and the head 14 1.6 Further reading 14 Questions for future research 15 4 EARLY TETRAPODS AND AMPHIBIANS 84 1.7 References 15 Key questions in this chapter 85 Introduction 85 2 HOW TO STUDY FOSSIL VERTEBRATES 18 4.1 Problems of life on land 85 4.2 Devonian tetrapods 88 Key questions in this chapter 19 4.3 The Carboniferous world 96 Introduction 19 4.4 Diversity of Carboniferous tetrapods 98 2.1 Digging up bones 19 4.5 Temnospondyls and reptiliomorphs after 2.2 Publication and professionalism 24 the Carboniferous 106 2.3 Geology and fossil vertebrates 29 4.6 Evolution of the modern amphibians 109 2.4 Biology and fossil vertebrates 33 4.7 Further reading 114 2.5 Discovering phylogeny 36 Questions for future research 114 2.6 The quality of the fossil record 39 4.8 References 114 2.7 Macroevolution 41 2.8 Further reading 43 2.9 References 43 5 EvOLUTION OF EARLY AMNIOTES 118 3 EARLY PALAEOZOIC FISHES 45 Key questions in this chapter 119 Introduction 119 Key questions in this chapter 46 5.1 Hylonomus and Paleothyris – biology Introduction 46 of the first amniotes 119 vi Contents 5.2 Amniote evolution 121 8.11 The Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction 259 5.3 The Permian world 125 8.12 Further reading 263 5.4 The parareptiles 125 Questions for future research 264 5.5 The eureptiles 128 8.13 References 264 5.6 Basal synapsid evolution 132 5.7 The Permo-Triassic mass extinction 142 5.8 Further reading 143 9 THE BIRDS 273 Questions for future research 143 5.9 References 143 Key questions in this chapter 274 Introduction 274 9.1 The origin of birds 274 6 BOUNCEBACK: TETRAPODS OF THE TRIASSIC 147 9.2 The origin of bird flight 282 9.3 Cretaceous birds, with and without teeth 287 Key questions in this chapter 148 9.4 The radiation of modern birds: explosion Introduction 148 or long fuse? 296 6.1 The Triassic world and its effect on 9.5 Flightless birds: Palaeognathae 299 the recovery of life 148 9.6 Neognathae 300 6.2 Triassic marine reptiles 150 9.7 The three-phase diversification of birds 311 6.3 Evolution of the archosauromorphs 154 9.8 Further reading 312 6.4 Origin of the dinosaurs 161 Questions for future research 313 6.5 Reptile evolution in the Triassic 164 9.9 References 313 6.6 Further reading 168 Questions for future research 168 6.7 References 168 10 MAMMALS 318 Key questions in this chapter 319 7 EvOLUTION OF FISHES AFTER Introduction 319 the deVONIAN 172 10.1 Cynodonts and the acquisition of mammalian characters 319 Key questions in this chapter 173 10.2 The first mammals 328 Introduction 173 10.3 The Mesozoic mammals 332 7.1 The early sharks and chimaeras 173 10.4 Evolution of modern mammals 343 7.2 Post-Palaeozoic chondrichthyan radiation 178 10.5 Marsupials down under 346 7.3 The early bony fishes 181 10.6 South American mammals – a world apart 349 7.4 Radiation of the teleosts 191 10.7 Afrotheria and the break-up of Gondwana 355 7.5 Post-Devonian evolution of fishes 198 10.8 Boreoeutherian beginnings: the Palaeocene 7.6 Further reading 199 in the northern hemisphere 361 Questions for future research 199 10.9 Basal laurasiatherians: Lipotyphla 366 7.7 References 199 10.10 Cetartiodactyla: cattle, pigs and whales 366 10.11 Pegasoferae: bats, horses, carnivores and pangolins 375 8 THE AGE OF DINOSAURS 204 10.12 Glires: rodents, rabbits and relatives 383 10.13 Archonta: primates, tree shrews and Key questions in this chapter 205 flying lemurs 388 Introduction 205 10.14 Ice age extinction of large mammals 389 8.1 Biology of Plateosaurus 205 10.15 Further reading 390 8.2 The Jurassic and Cretaceous world 206 Questions for future research 390 8.3 The diversity of saurischian dinosaurs 207 10.16 References 391 8.4 The diversity of ornithischian dinosaurs 221 8.5 Were the dinosaurs warm-blooded or not? 232 8.6 Pterosauria 236 11 HUMAN EVOLUTION 400 8.7 Testudinata: the turtles 241 8.8 Crocodylomorpha 247 Key questions in this chapter 401 8.9 Lepidosauria: lizards and snakes 250 Introduction 401 8.10 The great sea dragons 256 11.1 What are the primates? 401 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Contents vii 11.2 The fossil record of early primates 402 APPENDIX: CLASSIFICATION OF 11.3 Anthropoidea: monkeys and apes 407 THE VERTEBRATES 433 11.4 Hominoidea: the apes 411 11.5 Evolution of human characteristics 414 GLOSSARY 448 11.6 The early stages of human evolution 416 INDEX 453 11.7 The past two million years of human evolution 421 11.8 Further reading 428 Questions for future research 428 The colour plate section can be found between pp. 244–245 11.9 References 429 Preface To many, palaeontology in general, and vertebrate palaeontol- of the international appeal of vertebrate palaeontology and ogy in particular, might be seen as devoted to discovering new the demand from students and instructors for up-to-date fossils. After all, we read lavish press reports of each new species information.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identical Genomic Organization of Two Hemichordate Hox Clusters
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Current Biology 22, 2053–2058, November 6, 2012 ª2012 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.052 Report Identical Genomic Organization of Two Hemichordate Hox Clusters Robert Freeman,1,12 Tetsuro Ikuta,2,12 Michael Wu,3 [10] have similar organization to the hemichordate cluster, Ryo Koyanagi,2 Takeshi Kawashima,2 Kunifumi Tagawa,4 but with different posterior genes. These results provide Tom Humphreys,5 Guang-Chen Fang,6 Asao Fujiyama,7 genomic evidence for a well-ordered complex in the deutero- Hidetoshi Saiga,8 Christopher Lowe,9 Kim Worley,10 stome ancestor for the hox1–hox9/10 region, with the Jerry Jenkins,11 Jeremy Schmutz,11 Marc Kirschner,1 number and kind of posterior genes still to be elucidated. Daniel Rokhsar,3 Nori Satoh,2,* and John Gerhart3,* 1 Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Results and Discussion Boston, MA 02114, USA 2 Marine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Here we characterize the order, transcriptional orientation, and Technology Graduate University, Onna, clustering of the Hox genes of the genomes of two widely Okinawa 904-0495, Japan studied model hemichordates, Saccoglossus kowalevskii 3 Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of and Ptychodera flava [4, 11, 12], that represent two major California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA evolutionary branches of enteropneust hemichordates that 4 Marine Biological Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, diverged an estimated 400 million years ago (MYa) [13]: Hiroshima University, Onomichi, Hiroshima 722-0073, Japan Saccoglossus, of the direct developing harimaniids, and 5 Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Ptychodera, of the indirect developing ptychoderids [14].
    [Show full text]
  • Brains of Primitive Chordates 439
    Brains of Primitive Chordates 439 Brains of Primitive Chordates J C Glover, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway although providing a more direct link to the evolu- B Fritzsch, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA tionary clock, is nevertheless hampered by differing ã 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. rates of evolution, both among species and among genes, and a still largely deficient fossil record. Until recently, it was widely accepted, both on morpholog- ical and molecular grounds, that cephalochordates Introduction and craniates were sister taxons, with urochordates Craniates (which include the sister taxa vertebrata being more distant craniate relatives and with hemi- and hyperotreti, or hagfishes) represent the most chordates being more closely related to echinoderms complex organisms in the chordate phylum, particu- (Figure 1(a)). The molecular data only weakly sup- larly with respect to the organization and function of ported a coherent chordate taxon, however, indicat- the central nervous system. How brain complexity ing that apparent morphological similarities among has arisen during evolution is one of the most chordates are imposed on deep divisions among the fascinating questions facing modern science, and it extant deuterostome taxa. Recent analysis of a sub- speaks directly to the more philosophical question stantially larger number of genes has reversed the of what makes us human. Considerable interest has positions of cephalochordates and urochordates, pro- therefore been directed toward understanding the moting the latter to the most closely related craniate genetic and developmental underpinnings of nervous relatives (Figure 1(b)). system organization in our more ‘primitive’ chordate relatives, in the search for the origins of the vertebrate Comparative Appearance of Brains, brain in a common chordate ancestor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom
    lopmen ve ta e l B Williamson, Cell Dev Biol 2012, 1:1 D io & l l o l g DOI: 10.4172/2168-9296.1000101 e y C Cell & Developmental Biology ISSN: 2168-9296 Research Article Open Access The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom Abstract The larval transfer hypothesis states that larvae originated as adults in other taxa and their genomes were transferred by hybridization. It contests the view that larvae and corresponding adults evolved from common ancestors. The present paper reviews the life histories of chordates, and it interprets them in terms of the larval transfer hypothesis. It is the first paper to apply the hypothesis to craniates. I claim that the larvae of tunicates were acquired from adult larvaceans, the larvae of lampreys from adult cephalochordates, the larvae of lungfishes from adult craniate tadpoles, and the larvae of ray-finned fishes from other ray-finned fishes in different families. The occurrence of larvae in some fishes and their absence in others is correlated with reproductive behavior. Adult amphibians evolved from adult fishes, but larval amphibians did not evolve from either adult or larval fishes. I submit that [1] early amphibians had no larvae and that several families of urodeles and one subfamily of anurans have retained direct development, [2] the tadpole larvae of anurans and urodeles were acquired separately from different Mesozoic adult tadpoles, and [3] the post-tadpole larvae of salamanders were acquired from adults of other urodeles. Reptiles, birds and mammals probably evolved from amphibians that never acquired larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • High School Living Earth Evidence for Evolution Lessons Name: School: Teacher
    DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=CA-B High School Living Earth Evidence for Evolution Lessons Name: School: Teacher: The Unit should take approximately 4 days complete. Read each section and complete the tasks. DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=CA-B FIGURE 1: This creosote ring in the Mojave Desert is estimated to be 11 700 years old . This makes it one of the oldest living organisms on Earth . The creosote bush is thought to be the most drought-tolerant plant in North America. It has a variety of adaptations to its desert environment, including its reproductive tendency to clone outward in rings rather than rely solely on seed production. The plant’s leaves are coated in a foul-tasting resin that protects it from water loss through evaporation and from grazing. It only opens its stomata in the morning to pull in carbon dioxide for photosynthesis from the more humid air and closes them as the day’s temperature increases. It also has a root system that consists of both an exceptionally long tap root and a vast network of shallow feeder roots. Creosote bushes exhibit two different shapes to fit different microclimates. In drier areas, the plant has a cone shape in which stems funnel rainwater into the taproot. In wetter areas, the bush has a more rounded shape that provides shade to its shallow feeder roots. PREDICT How do species change over time to adjust to varying conditions? DRIVING QUESTIONS As you move through the unit, gather evidence to help you answer the following questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Annelid Axochord: Insights Into Notochord Evolution Antonella Lauri Et Al
    RESEARCH | REPORTS ORIGIN OF NOTOCHORD by double WMISH (Fig. 2, F to L). Although none of the genes were exclusively expressed in the annelid mesodermal midline, their combined Development of the annelid coexpression was unique to these cells (implying that mesodermal midline in annelids and chor- damesoderm in vertebrates are more similar to axochord: Insights into each other than to any other tissue). It is unlikely that the molecular similarity between annelid notochord evolution and vertebrate mesodermal midline is due to in- dependent co-option of a conserved gene cas- Antonella Lauri,1*† Thibaut Brunet,1* Mette Handberg-Thorsager,1,2‡ sette, because this would require either that this Antje H.L. Fischer,1§ Oleg Simakov,1 Patrick R. H. Steinmetz,1‖ Raju Tomer,1,2¶ cassette was active elsewhere in the body (which Philipp J. Keller,2 Detlev Arendt1,3# is not the case) or that multiple identical inde- pendent events of co-option occurred (which is The origin of chordates has been debated for more than a century, with one key issue being unparsimonious). As in vertebrates, the meso- the emergence of the notochord. In vertebrates, the notochord develops by convergence dermal midline resembles the neuroectodermal and extension of the chordamesoderm, a population of midline cells of unique molecular midline, which expresses foxD, foxA, netrin, slit, identity. We identify a population of mesodermal cells in a developing invertebrate, the marine and noggin (figs. S6 and S7) but not brachyury or annelid Platynereis dumerilii, that converges and extends toward the midline and expresses a twist. However, unlike in chicken (10), the an- notochord-specific combination of genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Alyssa Weinrauch
    The digestive physiology of the Pacific hagfish, Eptatretus stoutii by Alyssa Weinrauch A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physiology, Cell and Developmental Biology Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta © Alyssa Weinrauch, 2019 Abstract Hagfish are considered the oldest living representatives of the vertebrates and as such are of interest for studies in evolutionary biology. Moreover, hagfish occupy a unique trophic niche wherein they are active predators and benthic scavengers of a wide range of invertebrate and vertebrate prey, yet can tolerate nearly a year of fasting. Hagfish are also capable of acquiring nutrients across the integument in a manner similar to that of marine invertebrates, a hallmark of their position between the invertebrate and vertebrate lineages. Despite many interesting modes of feeding, relatively few studies have examined the digestive physiology of the hagfishes. Feeding and digestion cause many physiological perturbations, which result in elevated metabolic rate. I have characterised the increased metabolic demand (specific dynamic action) and determined that its peak in hagfish corresponds with the peak of acid-base alterations. Specifically, the rate of base efflux reaches a maximum 8 h post- feeding when the intestinal blood supply is significantly more alkaline. The offloading of base to the circulation (alkaline tide) is common of vertebrates that employ an acidic digestion in order to maintain cellular acid-base homeostasis. Likewise, the hagfishes employ a luminal acidification, despite lacking a stomach. I further investigated the cellular mechanisms responsible for hindgut luminal acidification and found that soluble adenylyl cyclase and cAMP are utilised to enhance proton secretion via proton-potassium exchangers (HKA), as is found in later-diverging vertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Information in Taxonomists' Heads to Resolve Hagfish And
    This article was downloaded by: [Max Planck Inst fuer Evolutionsbiologie] On: 03 September 2013, At: 07:01 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ghbi20 Using information in taxonomists’ heads to resolve hagfish and lamprey relationships and recapitulate craniate–vertebrate phylogenetic history Maria Abou Chakra a , Brian Keith Hall b & Johnny Ricky Stone a b c d a Department of Biology , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada b Department of Biology , Dalhousie University , Halifax , Canada c Origins Institute, McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada d SHARCNet, McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada Published online: 02 Sep 2013. To cite this article: Historical Biology (2013): Using information in taxonomists’ heads to resolve hagfish and lamprey relationships and recapitulate craniate–vertebrate phylogenetic history, Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2013.825792 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitional Fossils by Greg
    Transitional Fossils By Greg Neyman © Answers In Creation Answers In Creation Website www.answersincreation.org/transitional_fossils.htm Transitional fossils, or the supposed lack thereof, has been used for many years by anti-evolutionists to argue against evolution. Here, I will explain what a transitional fossil is, and why it is not valid as an argument against evolution. A transitional fossil shows the evolutionary development from one species to another. For example, if organism 1 existed 70 million years ago, and organism 2 shows up in the fossil record 5 million years later, then theoretically there should be intermediate species in this 5 million year gap, which shows gradual progression from one species to another. The lack of these "transitional" fossils is proof to young earth creationists that evolution is false. Evolutionists have shown that indeed there are transitional fossils, and there are plenty of examples of them. For instance, see http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq- transitional.html . Here is the key point...even if young earth creationists accept these examples of transitional fossils, they will still claim that there are no transitional fossils! These fossils will be called either unique species, or they will come up with some reason (disease, birth defect, etc) that accounts for the apparent transition feature. Naturally, they will say, "Where are the transitional fossils between these transitional fossils?" If we had a clear fossil record, showing progression every 10,000 years for millions of years, they will not believe it, and will want the "transitional" fossils for the missing 10,000 year period. No amount of evidence will convict them that their belief is wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemichordate Phylogeny: a Molecular, and Genomic Approach By
    Hemichordate Phylogeny: A molecular, and genomic approach by Johanna Taylor Cannon A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 4, 2014 Keywords: phylogeny, evolution, Hemichordata, bioinformatics, invertebrates Copyright 2014 by Johanna Taylor Cannon Approved by Kenneth M. Halanych, Chair, Professor of Biological Sciences Jason Bond, Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Leslie Goertzen, Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Scott Santos, Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Abstract The phylogenetic relationships within Hemichordata are significant for understanding the evolution of the deuterostomes. Hemichordates possess several important morphological structures in common with chordates, and they have been fixtures in hypotheses on chordate origins for over 100 years. However, current evidence points to a sister relationship between echinoderms and hemichordates, indicating that these chordate-like features were likely present in the last common ancestor of these groups. Therefore, Hemichordata should be highly informative for studying deuterostome character evolution. Despite their importance for understanding the evolution of chordate-like morphological and developmental features, relationships within hemichordates have been poorly studied. At present, Hemichordata is divided into two classes, the solitary, free-living enteropneust worms, and the colonial, tube- dwelling Pterobranchia. The objective of this dissertation is to elucidate the evolutionary relationships of Hemichordata using multiple datasets. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to Hemichordata and outlines the objectives for the dissertation research. Chapter 2 presents a molecular phylogeny of hemichordates based on nuclear ribosomal 18S rDNA and two mitochondrial genes. In this chapter, we suggest that deep-sea family Saxipendiidae is nested within Harrimaniidae, and Torquaratoridae is affiliated with Ptychoderidae.
    [Show full text]
  • New Transitional Fossil from Late Jurassic of Chile Sheds Light on the Origin of Modern Crocodiles Fernando E
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN New transitional fossil from late Jurassic of Chile sheds light on the origin of modern crocodiles Fernando E. Novas1,2, Federico L. Agnolin1,2,3*, Gabriel L. Lio1, Sebastián Rozadilla1,2, Manuel Suárez4, Rita de la Cruz5, Ismar de Souza Carvalho6,8, David Rubilar‑Rogers7 & Marcelo P. Isasi1,2 We describe the basal mesoeucrocodylian Burkesuchus mallingrandensis nov. gen. et sp., from the Upper Jurassic (Tithonian) Toqui Formation of southern Chile. The new taxon constitutes one of the few records of non‑pelagic Jurassic crocodyliforms for the entire South American continent. Burkesuchus was found on the same levels that yielded titanosauriform and diplodocoid sauropods and the herbivore theropod Chilesaurus diegosuarezi, thus expanding the taxonomic composition of currently poorly known Jurassic reptilian faunas from Patagonia. Burkesuchus was a small‑sized crocodyliform (estimated length 70 cm), with a cranium that is dorsoventrally depressed and transversely wide posteriorly and distinguished by a posteroventrally fexed wing‑like squamosal. A well‑defned longitudinal groove runs along the lateral edge of the postorbital and squamosal, indicative of a anteroposteriorly extensive upper earlid. Phylogenetic analysis supports Burkesuchus as a basal member of Mesoeucrocodylia. This new discovery expands the meagre record of non‑pelagic representatives of this clade for the Jurassic Period, and together with Batrachomimus, from Upper Jurassic beds of Brazil, supports the idea that South America represented a cradle for the evolution of derived crocodyliforms during the Late Jurassic. In contrast to the Cretaceous Period and Cenozoic Era, crocodyliforms from the Jurassic Period are predomi- nantly known from marine forms (e.g., thalattosuchians)1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Factors of Bilaterian Evolution Peter Heger1*, Wen Zheng1†, Anna Rottmann1, Kristen a Panfilio2,3, Thomas Wiehe1
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The genetic factors of bilaterian evolution Peter Heger1*, Wen Zheng1†, Anna Rottmann1, Kristen A Panfilio2,3, Thomas Wiehe1 1Institute for Genetics, Cologne Biocenter, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 2Institute for Zoology: Developmental Biology, Cologne Biocenter, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 3School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, United Kingdom Abstract The Cambrian explosion was a unique animal radiation ~540 million years ago that produced the full range of body plans across bilaterians. The genetic mechanisms underlying these events are unknown, leaving a fundamental question in evolutionary biology unanswered. Using large-scale comparative genomics and advanced orthology evaluation techniques, we identified 157 bilaterian-specific genes. They include the entire Nodal pathway, a key regulator of mesoderm development and left-right axis specification; components for nervous system development, including a suite of G-protein-coupled receptors that control physiology and behaviour, the Robo- Slit midline repulsion system, and the neurotrophin signalling system; a high number of zinc finger transcription factors; and novel factors that previously escaped attention. Contradicting the current view, our study reveals that genes with bilaterian origin are robustly associated with key features in extant bilaterians, suggesting a causal relationship. *For correspondence: [email protected] Introduction The taxon Bilateria consists of multicellular animals
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic Field Guide 5.5.Indb
    Field Identifi cation Guide to Heard Island and McDonald Islands Benthic Invertebrates Invertebrates Benthic Moore Islands Kirrily and McDonald and Hibberd Ty Island Heard to Guide cation Identifi Field Field Identifi cation Guide to Heard Island and McDonald Islands Benthic Invertebrates A guide for scientifi c observers aboard fi shing vessels Little is known about the deep sea benthic invertebrate diversity in the territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands (HIMI). In an initiative to help further our understanding, invertebrate surveys over the past seven years have now revealed more than 500 species, many of which are endemic. This is an essential reference guide to these species. Illustrated with hundreds of representative photographs, it includes brief narratives on the biology and ecology of the major taxonomic groups and characteristic features of common species. It is primarily aimed at scientifi c observers, and is intended to be used as both a training tool prior to deployment at-sea, and for use in making accurate identifi cations of invertebrate by catch when operating in the HIMI region. Many of the featured organisms are also found throughout the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean, the guide therefore having national appeal. Ty Hibberd and Kirrily Moore Australian Antarctic Division Fisheries Research and Development Corporation covers2.indd 113 11/8/09 2:55:44 PM Author: Hibberd, Ty. Title: Field identification guide to Heard Island and McDonald Islands benthic invertebrates : a guide for scientific observers aboard fishing vessels / Ty Hibberd, Kirrily Moore. Edition: 1st ed. ISBN: 9781876934156 (pbk.) Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Benthic animals—Heard Island (Heard and McDonald Islands)--Identification.
    [Show full text]