The Role of Stainless Steels in Petroleum Refining
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Amorphous Silica Containers for Germanium Ultrapurification by Zone Refining O
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Siberian Federal University Digital Repository ISSN 0020-1685, Inorganic Materials, 2016, Vol. 52, No. 11, pp. 1091–1095. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2016. Original Russian Text © O.I. Podkopaev, A.F. Shimanskii, T.V. Kulakovskaya, A.N. Gorodishcheva, N.O. Golubovskaya, 2016, published in Neorganicheskie Materialy, 2016, Vol. 52, No. 11, pp. 1163–1167. Amorphous Silica Containers for Germanium Ultrapurification by Zone Refining O. I. Podkopaeva, *, A. F. Shimanskiib, **, T. V. Kulakovskayaa, A. N. Gorodishchevac, ***, and N. O. Golubovskayab aOJSC Germanium, Transportnyi proezd 1, Krasnoyarsk, 660027 Russia bSiberian Federal University, Svobodnyi pr. 79, Krasnoyarsk, 660047 Russia cReshetnev Siberian State Aerospace University, pr. im. gazety Krasnoyarskii rabochii 31, Krasnoyarsk, 660014 Russia *e-mail: [email protected] **e-mail: [email protected] ***e-mail: [email protected] Received March 2, 2016 Abstract—We have studied the wetting behavior of molten germanium on silica ceramics and amorphous sil- ica coatings in vacuum at a pressure of 1 Pa and a temperature of 1273 K. The results demonstrate that the wetting of rough surfaces of ceramic samples and coatings by liquid Ge is significantly poorer than that of the smooth surface of quartz glass. The contact angle of polished glass is ~100°, and that of the ceramics and coatings increases from 112° to 137° as the total impurity content of the material decreases from 0.120 to 1 × 10–3 wt %. Using experimental contact angle data, we calculated the work of adhesion of molten Ge to the materials studied. -
4.5 Mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate. Part of the Variable Angle Periarticular Plating System
4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate. Part of the Variable Angle Periarticular Plating System. Technique Guide Table of Contents Introduction 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plates 2 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate System 4 AO Principles 5 Indications 6 Surgical Technique Preparation 7 Reduce Articular Surface 11 Insert Plate 12 Insert Screw in Central Plate Head Hole 20 Option A: 5.0 mm Solid Variable Angle Screw 20 Option B: 5.0 mm Cannulated Variable Angle Screw 23 Insert Screws in Surrounding Plate Head Holes 26 Option A: 5.0 mm Solid Variable Angle Screws 26 Option B: 5.0 mm Cannulated Variable Angle Screws 30 Insert Screws in Plate Shaft 32 Option A: 4.5 mm Cortex Screws 32 Option B: 5.0 mm Solid Variable Angle Screws 34 Option C: 5.0 mm Cannulated Variable Angle Screws 37 Remove Instruments 40 Product Information Implants 41 Instruments 43 Set Lists 45 Image intensifier control 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate Technique Guide Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plates. Part of the Variable Angle Periarticular Plating System. The Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate is part of the VA-LCP Periarticular Plating System which merges variable angle locking screw technology with conventional plating techniques. The 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate System has many similarities to standard locking fixation methods, with a few important improvements. Variable angle locking screws provide the ability to create a fixed-angle construct while also allowing the surgeon the freedom to choose the screw trajectory before “fixing” the angle of the screw. -
Louisiana Crude Oil Refinery Survey Report: Eleventh Edition
LOUISIANA CRUDE OIL REFINERY SURVEY REPORT Eleventh Edition Louisiana Fiscal Year 1999 Survey by Sam Stuckey, P.E. Refining, Alternative Energy & Power Systems Program LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Jack C. Caldwell Secretary of Natural Resources Technology Assessment Division T. Michael French, P.E. Director Baton Rouge, Louisiana November 15, 1999 This edition of Louisiana Crude Oil Refinery Survey Report is funded 100% ($320.30) with Petroleum Violation Escrow funds as part of the State Energy Conservation Program as approved by the U.S. Department of Energy and Louisiana Department of Natural Resources. This public document was published at a total cost of $320.30. 300 copies of this public document were published in this first printing at a total cost of $320.30. The total cost of all printings of this document, including reprints, is $320.30. This document was published by the Department of Natural Resources, 625 N. 4th Street, Baton Rouge, LA, to promulgate the State Energy Conservation Plan developed under authority of P.L. 94-163. This material was printed in accordance with the standards for printing by State agencies established pursuant to R.S. 43:31. Printing of this material was purchased in accordance with the provisions of Title 43 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE FOREWORD ......................................................... 1 DISCUSSION ......................................................... 3 DEFINITIONS ......................................................... 33 FIGURES 1 Location Map of Louisiana Refineries ..................................... 2 2 Operating Rates of Louisiana, Texas Gulf Coast, and all U.S. Refineries 1989-1999 .................................................................................. 17 3 Operating Capacity of Louisiana and U.S. Refineries 1947-1999 .................. 21 4 Louisiana Oil Production and Refinery Operating Capacity 1900-1998 ........................................ -
Refining Crude Oil
REFINING CRUDE OIL New Zealand buys crude oil from overseas, as well as drilling for some oil locally. This oil is a mixture of many hydrocarbons that has to be refined before it can be used for fuel. All crude oil in New Zealand is refined by The New Zealand Refining Company at their Marsden Point refinery where it is converted to petrol, diesel, kerosene, aviation fuel, bitumen, refinery gas (which fuels the refinery) and sulfur. The refining process depends on the chemical processes of distillation (separating liquids by their different boiling points) and catalysis (which speeds up reaction rates), and uses the principles of chemical equilibria. Chemical equilibrium exists when the reactants in a reaction are producing products, but those products are being recombined again into reactants. By altering the reaction conditions the amount of either products or reactants can be increased. Refining is carried out in three main steps. Step 1 - Separation The oil is separated into its constituents by distillation, and some of these components (such as the refinery gas) are further separated with chemical reactions and by using solvents which dissolve one component of a mixture significantly better than another. Step 2 - Conversion The various hydrocarbons produced are then chemically altered to make them more suitable for their intended purpose. For example, naphthas are "reformed" from paraffins and naphthenes into aromatics. These reactions often use catalysis, and so sulfur is removed from the hydrocarbons before they are reacted, as it would 'poison' the catalysts used. The chemical equilibria are also manipulated to ensure a maximum yield of the desired product. -
The Chemistry of Sulfur in Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Catalytic Reduction of Sulfur in Fluid Catalytic Cracking Rick Wormsbecher Collaborators Grace Davison Laboratoire Catalyse et Spectrochimie, CNRS, Université de Caen Ruizhong Hu Michael Ziebarth Fabian Can Wu-Cheng Cheng Francoise Maugé Robert H. Harding Arnaud Travert Xinjin Zhao Terry Roberie Ranjit Kumar Thomas Albro Robert Gatte Outline • Review of fluid catalytic cracking. • Sulfur balance and sulfur cracking chemistry. • Catalytic reduction of sulfur by Zn aluminate/alumina. Fluid Catalytic Cracking • Refinery process that “cracks” high molecular weight hydrocarbons to lower molecular weight. • Refinery process that provides ~50 % of all transportation fuels indirectly. • Provides ~35 % of total gasoline pool directly from FCC produced naphtha. • ~80 % of the sulfur in gasolines comes from the FCC naphtha. Sulfur in Gasoline • Sulfur compounds reversibly poison the auto emission catalysts, increasing NOx and hydrocarbon emission. SOx emissions as well. • World-wide regulations to limit the sulfur content of transportation fuels. – 10 - 30 ppm gasoline. • Sulfur can be removed by hydrogenation chemistry. – Expensive. – Lowers fuel quality. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit Products Riser Flue Gas Reactor (~500 ºC) Regenerator (~725 ºC) Reaction is endothermic. 400 tons Catalyst circulates from catalyst Riser to Regenerator. inventory 50, 000 Air Feedstock barrels/day Carbon Distribution H2 ~0.05 % Flare C1 ~1.0 % Flare Petrochem Feed C2-C4 ~14-18 % Naphtha MW ~330 g/mole C5-C11 ~50 % C12-C22 ~15-25 % LCO C22+ ~5-15 % HCO Coke ~3-10 % -
Vulcanization & Accelerators
Vulcanization & Accelerators Vulcanization is a cross linking process in which individual molecules of rubber (polymer) are converted into a three dimensional network of interconnected (polymer) chains through chemical cross links(of sulfur). The vulcanization process was discovered in 1839 and the individuals responsible for this discovery were Charles Goodyear in USA and Thomas Hancock in England. Both discovered the use of Sulfur and White Lead as a vulcanization system for Natural Rubber. This discovery was a major technological breakthrough for the advancement of the world economy. Vulcanization of rubbers by sulfur alone is an extremely slow and inefficient process. The chemical reaction between sulfur and the Rubber Hydrocarbon occurs mainly at the C = C (double bonds) and each crosslink requires 40 to 55 sulphur atoms (in the absence of accelerator). The process takes around 6 hours at 140°C for completion, which is uneconomical by any production standards. The vulcanizates thus produced are extremely prone to oxidative degradation and do not possess adequate mechanical properties for practical rubber applications. These limitations were overcome through inventions of accelerators which subsequently became a part of rubber compounding formulations as well as subjects of further R&D. Following is the summary of events which led to the progress of ‘Accelerated Sulfur Vulcanization'. Event Year Progress - Discovery of Sulfur Vulcanization: Charles Goodyear. 1839 Vulcanizing Agent - Use of ammonia & aliphatic ammonium derivatives: Rowley. 1881 Acceleration need - Use of aniline as accelerator in USA & Germany: Oenslager. 1906 Accelerated Cure - Use of Piperidine accelerator- Germany. 1911 New Molecules - Use of aldehyde-amine & HMT as accelerators in USA & UK 1914-15 Amine Accelerators - Use of Zn-Alkyl Xanthates accelerators in Russia. -
Information to Users
INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quédlty of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hemd comer and continu ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or in black and white paper format. * 4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro fiche but lack clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, all photographs are available in black and white stcmdard 35mm slide format.* *For more information about black and white slides or enlarged paper reproductions, please contact the Dissertations Customer Services Department. IVBcrofilnis lateniai^oiial 8612390 Lee, Jong-Kwon STRESS CORROSION CRACKING AND PITTING OF SENSITIZED TYPE 304 STAINLESS STEEL IN CHLORIDE SOLUTIONS CONTAINING SULFUR SPECIES AT TEMPERATURES FROM 50 TO 200 DEGREES C The Ohio State University Ph.D. -
Oil Refinery Sector
Gujarat Cleaner Production Centre - ENVIS Centre CLEANER PRODUCTION OPPURTUNITIES IN OIL REFINERY SECTOR Gujarat Cleaner Production Centre - ENVIS Centre OIL REFINERY An oil refinery or petroleum refinery is an industrial process plant where crude oil is processed and refined into more useful products such as petroleum naphtha, gasoline, diesel fuel, asphalt base, heating oil, kerosene and liquefied petroleum gas. Oil refineries are typically large, sprawling industrial complexes with extensive piping running throughout, carrying streams of fluids between large chemical processing units. Common process units found in a refinery: • Desalter unit washes out salt from the crude oil before it enters the atmospheric distillation unit. • Atmospheric distillation unit distills crude oil into fractions. • Vacuum distillation unit further distills residual bottoms after atmospheric distillation. • Naphtha hydrotreater unit uses hydrogen to desulfurize naphtha from atmospheric distillation. Must hydrotreat the naphtha before sending to a Catalytic Reformer unit. • Catalytic reformer unit is used to conver t the naphtha-boiling range molecules into higher octane reformate (reformer product). The reformate has higher content of aromatics and cyclic hydrocarbons). An important byproduct of a r eformer is hydrogen released during the catalyst reaction. The hydrogen is used either in the hydrotreater or the hydrocracker. • Distillate hydrotreater unit desulfurizes distillates (such as diesel) after atmospheric distillation. • Fluid catalytic cracker (FCC) unit upgrades heavier fractions into lighter, more valuable products. • Hydrocracker unit uses hydrogen to upgrade heavier fractions into lighter, more valuable products. • Visbreaking unit upgrades heavy residual oils by thermally cracking them into li ghter, more valuable reduced viscosity products. • Merox unit treats LPG, kerosene or jet fuel by oxidizing mercaptans to organic disulfides. -
Exxonmobil Torrance Refinery Electrostatic Precipitator Explosion Torrance, California
InvestigationInvestigation Report Report ExxonMobil Torrance Refinery Electrostatic Precipitator Explosion Torrance, California Incident Date: February 18, 2015 On-Site Property Damage, Catalyst Particles Released to Community, Near Miss in MHF Alkylation Unit No. 2015-02-I-CA KEY ISSUES: • Lack of Safe Operating Limits and Operating Procedure • Safeguard Effectiveness • Operating Equipment Beyond Safe Operating Life • Re-use of Previous Procedure Variance Without Sufficient Hazard Analysis Published May 2017 CSB · ExxonMobil Torrance Refinery Investigation Report The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is an independent Federal agency whose mission is to drive chemical safety change through independent investigations to protect people and the environment. The CSB is a scientific investigative organization; it is not an enforcement or regulatory body. Established by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the CSB is responsible for determining accident causes, issuing safety recommendations, studying chemical safety issues, and evaluating the effectiveness of other government agencies involved in chemical safety. More information about the CSB is available at www.csb.gov. The CSB makes public its actions and decisions through investigative publications, all of which may include safety recommendations when appropriate. Examples of the types of publications include: CSB Investigation Reports: formal, detailed reports on significant chemical accidents and include key findings, root causes, and safety recommendations. CSB Investigation Digests: plain-language summaries of Investigation Reports. CSB Case Studies: examines fewer issues than a full investigative report, case studies present investigative information from specific accidents and include a discussion of relevant prevention practices. CSB Safety Bulletins: short, general-interest publications that provide new or timely information intended to facilitate the prevention of chemical accidents. -
ADVANCES in FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING (November 2005)
Abstract Process Economics Program Report 195A ADVANCES IN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING (November 2005) Recent emphasis in fluid catalytic cracking is on maximum light olefins production, gasoline sulfur reduction and compliance with FCCU NOx and SOx emissions requirements. New cracking catalysts and additives for the reduction of NOx, SOx and gasoline sulfur continue to significantly improve FCCU operation. New hardware designs offer improved unit operation and efficiency. Areas of recent new hardware design improvements include the standpipe inlet, third stage cyclones, spent catalyst distributor and catalyst stripping. Wet gas scrubbers or selective catalytic reduction may now be required in some cases to meet emissions requirements. This report provides an overview of FCC developments in catalyst, process and hardware technologies since PEP Report 195, Advances in Fluid Catalytic Cracking, issued in 1991. The report then develops process economics for cracking the most common type of FCC feedstock, vacuum gas oil. PEP Report 228, Refinery Residue Upgrading, issued in 2000 reviews the special issues and technology of Residual Fluid Catalytic Cracking (RFCC) and develops process economics for cracking a residual feedstock. Since the refinery production of light olefins such as propylene offers refiners in some regions, especially Asia and Western Europe, an opportunity for profit, the process economics of maximum light olefins FCC from VGO are developed. Air emissions (SOX, NOX) from FCCUs and the reduction of FCC gasoline sulfur are major environmental issues discussed. Professionals and managers involved in the energy industry who manage, research, develop, plan, operate, design plants or manage investments in the petroleum refining and allied industries could benefit from the information contained in this report. -
(HDS) Unit for Petroleum Naphtha at 3500 Barrels Per Day
Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 9 (2015) 88-100 EISSN 2392-2192 Design Parameters for a Hydro desulfurization (HDS) Unit for Petroleum Naphtha at 3500 Barrels per Day Debajyoti Bose University of Petroleum & Energy Studies, College of Engineering Studies, P.O. Bidholi via- Prem Nagar, Dehradun 248007, India E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT The present work reviews the setting up of a hydrodesulphurization unit for petroleum naphtha. Estimating all the properties of the given petroleum fraction including its density, viscosity and other parameters. The process flow sheet which gives the idea of necessary equipment to be installed, then performing all material and energy balance calculations along with chemical and mechanical design for the entire setup taking into account every instrument considered. The purpose of this review paper takes involves an industrial process, a catalytic chemical process widely used to remove sulfur (S) from naphtha. Keywords: hydro desulfurization, naphtha, petroleum, sulfur Relevance to Design Practice - The purpose of removing the sulfur is to reduce the sulfur dioxide emissions that result from using those fuels in automotive vehicles, aircraft, railroad locomotives, gas or oil burning power plants, residential and industrial furnaces, and other forms of fuel combustion. World Scientific News 9 (2015) 88-100 1. INTRODUCTION Hydrodesulphurization (HDS) is a catalytic chemical process widely used to remove sulfur (S) from natural gas and from refined petroleum products such as gasoline or petrol, jet fuel, kerosene, diesel fuel, and fuel oils. The purpose of removing the sulfur is to reduce the sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions that result from various combustion practices. -
BENZENE Disclaimer
United States Office of Air Quality EPA-454/R-98-011 Environmental Protection Planning And Standards June 1998 Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 AIR EPA LOCATING AND ESTIMATING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SOURCES OF BENZENE Disclaimer This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and has been approved for publication. Mention of trade names and commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of use. EPA-454/R-98-011 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF TABLES.....................................................x LIST OF FIGURES.................................................. xvi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................xx 1.0 PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT .......................................... 1-1 2.0 OVERVIEW OF DOCUMENT CONTENTS.............................. 2-1 3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ...................................... 3-1 3.1 NATURE OF POLLUTANT..................................... 3-1 3.2 OVERVIEW OF PRODUCTION AND USE ......................... 3-4 3.3 OVERVIEW OF EMISSIONS.................................... 3-8 4.0 EMISSIONS FROM BENZENE PRODUCTION ........................... 4-1 4.1 CATALYTIC REFORMING/SEPARATION PROCESS................ 4-7 4.1.1 Process Description for Catalytic Reforming/Separation........... 4-7 4.1.2 Benzene Emissions from Catalytic Reforming/Separation .......... 4-9 4.2 TOLUENE DEALKYLATION AND TOLUENE DISPROPORTIONATION PROCESS ............................ 4-11 4.2.1 Toluene Dealkylation