DOCSLIB.ORG

Enterprise Plc - Zenit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enterprise Plc - Zenit ADE – ENTERPRISE PLC - ZENIT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1. REGIONAL INNOVATION POLICY IN EUROPE .............................................................................. 3 2. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY................................................................................................ 10 2.1 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION .....................................................................................................10 2.2 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH ...............................................................................................................................12 3. BASELINE SITUATION ............................................................................................................. 22 3.1 SOCIO-ECONOMIC SITUATION AND INDICATORS..................................................................................................22 3.2 RTDI REGIONAL PROFILES AND INDICATORS........................................................................................................30 4. THE IMPORTANCE OF RTDI IN OBJECTIVE 2 PROGRAMMES..................................................... 33 4.1 PROGRAMME DESIGN MECHANISMS AND THE INTEGRATION OF RTDI............................................................33 4.2 RTDI AS A PRIORITY THEME ....................................................................................................................................35 4.3 THE SCALE OF FUNDING.............................................................................................................................................46 5. PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT................................................................................................. 57 5.1 REGIONAL INNOVATION PARTNERSHIPS AND OBJECTIVE 2 PROGRAMMES.....................................................57 5.2 SELECTION CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES...............................................................................................................65 5.3 EVALUATION AND MONITORING..............................................................................................................................72 6. EFFECTIVENESS OF RTDI ACTIONS ......................................................................................... 83 6.1 IMPACT SURVEY..........................................................................................................................................................83 6.2 HOW DOES RTDI AFFECT REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS? .................................................................................89 6.3 RTDI AND HUMAN RESOURCES IN OBJECTIVE 2 ZONES.......................................................................................94 6.4 SYNERGIES....................................................................................................................................................................97 7. ENHANCING THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT OF RTDI ACTIONS UNDER OBJECTIVE 2 - KEY MESSAGES FOR 2000+ ....................................................................................................104 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1.1: Division of Responsibilities Regional/National Levels ..................................................... 8 TABLE 2.1: The Seven key issues identified by the TOR ............................................................... 10 TABLE 2.2: Five Key Aspects of the Comparative Analysis........................................................... 12 TABLE 2.3: Sources of information............................................................................................... 14 TABLE 2.4: Categorisation of measures........................................................................................ 16 TABLE 2.5: List of case study regions and members of evaluation team.......................................... 19 TABLE 3.1: Objective 2 and Total Unemployment Rates per country.............................................. 23 TABLE 3.2: Summary of socio-economic and RTDI situation in Objective 2 zones........................... 24 TABLE 3.3: possible RTDI Priority Baseline Indicators.................................................................. 28 TABLE 4.1: SPDs with RTDI identified as a priority...................................................................... 36 TABLE 4.2: Categorisation of the evolution of RTDI activities........................................................ 40 TABLE 4.3: A Comparative Assessment Of Objective 2 Programme Structures In 1989-1999 Programmes ........................................................................................................... 43 TABLE 4.4: RTDI spending planned in Objective 2 SPDs (1994-1996)............................................ 48 TABLE 4.5: Trends in RTDI share of SPD budget 1994-96 / 1997-99 ............................................. 52 TABLE 4.6: Evolution of the share of S,T,I categories in planned RTDI resources ........................... 53 TABLE 4.7: Breakdown of planned, committed and actual expenditure by category of RTDI expenditure in a number of case study regions............................................................................. 55 TABLE 5.1: Partnerships and programme management - a qualitative assessment ........................... 58 Thematic Evaluation RTDI in Objective 2 – Synthesis Report 1 ADE – ENTERPRISE PLC - ZENIT TABLE 5.2: Selection criteria - Austrian Industrial Research Promotion Fund.................................. 68 TABLE 5.3: Evaluation culture and techniques in case study regions ............................................... 73 TABLE 5.4 : indicators for evaluating RTDI actions – some examples ............................................ 80 TABLE 6.1: Structure of survey and respondent firms .................................................................... 83 TABLE 6.2: R&D budget in percent of total turnover..................................................................... 85 TABLE 6.3: Actual outcomes as compared to expectations ............................................................ 88 TABLE 6.4: Types of RTDI actions financed through ESF – Auvergne and Nord-Pas de Calais...... 94 LIST OF BOXES BOX 1: Efficiency and effectiveness - the arguments for Regional Innovation Policy......................... 8 BOX 2: Difficulties in Identifying RTDI content ............................................................................ 18 BOX 3: Socio-economic and innovation monitoring system............................................................. 26 BOX 4: Towards indicators for the knowledge-based economy ...................................................... 27 BOX 5: Developing a Regional Innovation Profile - the case of RTP Limburg................................. 32 BOX 6: The Bremen WAP and Objective 2.................................................................................. 34 BOX 7: Illustrative structure of typical RTDI priority in Italian SPDs.............................................. 37 BOX 8: RTDI Priority in West Midlands SPDs 1989-99 ................................................................ 37 BOX 9: The budgetary logic in the SPD design process ................................................................. 38 Box 10: Examples of "drivers and barriers" to meeting spending targets ......................................... 54 BOX 11: MEDILINK Yorkshire & Humberside ........................................................................... 61 BOX 12: Development of RTDI Strategies in Dutch Objective 2 regions ........................................ 62 BOX 13: IRISI in Piemonte – strategic planning and the information society ................................... 63 BOX 14: Mechanisms for monitoring RTDI actions – client monitoring.......................................... 75 BOX 15: Good and bad practice in monitoring and evaluation ......................................................... 77 BOX 16: Thematic evaluation of RDTI in Aquitaine ..................................................................... 81 BOX 17: CORTECHS – introduction of technicians in SMEs......................................................... 95 BOX 18: New master's programme of the University of Jyväskylä ................................................. 96 BOX 19: Developing a research environment on pulpwood and Paper in Finland ............................. 99 BOX 20: Synergies of Objective 2 RTDI Measures: TELERISE...................................................100 BOX 21: Using Innovation As a promotional hook for inward investors..........................................101 BOX 22: Five Main Messages for Policy Makers.........................................................................104 LIST OF DIAGRAMS DIAGRAM 1: Employment Weight of three main industries ‘87-93.................................................. 23 DIAGRAM 2: RTDI planned budget share in 1994-1996 SPD......................................................... 49 DIAGRAM 3: ALLOCATION OF RTDI FINANCIAL RESOURCES ....................................................... 50 DIAGRAM 4: Science (S), Technology (T) and Innovation (I) shares in 1994-96 RTDI budget per country................................................................................................................. 51 DIAGRAM 5: Evolution of RTDI resources in Objective 2 programme............................................ 53 DIAGRAM
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Equality Impact Assessment
    Equality Impact Assessment Introduction An Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) is required to ensure that equality is placed at the centre of policy development and review, as well as service delivery. The purpose of this EIA is to systematically analyse the likely impact of a service, policy or proposals on different community groups, and how the needs of such groups have been taken into account in developing those proposals. The EIA can anticipate and recommend ways to avoid any discriminatory or negative consequences for a particular group, on the grounds of any protected characteristic. It provides the opportunity to demonstrate the potential benefits for equality target groups arising from a proposed policy or project. The need for an EIA stems from the general duty placed on public authorities to eliminate unlawful discrimination in carrying out functions, and promote equality of opportunity. This is outlined in the Equality Act 2010, with specific public sector duties in place from April 2011. 1. Name of Policy or Service (existing or proposed) Parks & Open Spaces 2. Responsible Manager Andrew Richardson 3. Date EIA completed Review date 20/05/2012 20/05/2013 4. Description and aims of policy / service (including relevance to equalities) The provision of high quality parks and public open spaces including playgrounds throughout the borough. To provide information and education through events and activities and encouraging the use of open space by others for organised events increasing the use of the facilities. 5. Who are the stakeholders? All residents of South Ribble, elected members and council employees. 1 6. What outcomes do we want to achieve? To provide high quality parks and open spaces accessible to all abilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel Needs Assessment
    GVA RGA FINAL GVA 10 Stratton Street London W1J 8JR Hotel Needs Assessment Preston, Lancashire Prepared for: Preston City Council April 2013 Preston City Council Contents Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 6 3. PRESTON MARKET OVERVIEW........................................................................................................... 12 4. PRESTON HOTEL SUPPLY..................................................................................................................... 27 5. PRIMARY DEMAND RESEARCH ......................................................................................................... 38 6. PRESTON HOTEL PERFORMANCE ..................................................................................................... 43 7. HOTEL BENCHMARKING APPRAISAL................................................................................................ 48 8. HOTEL OPERATOR CONTEXT ............................................................................................................. 55 9. HOTEL DEVELOPMENT APPRAISAL ................................................................................................... 60 10. APPENDIX 1.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Representations – Preferred Core Strategy Regulation 30(1)(D) Report
    - Local Development Framework Central Lancashire Core Strategy Statement of Representations – Preferred Core Strategy Regulation 30(1)(d) Report December 2010 This page is left deliberately blank 2 STATEMENT OF REPRESENTATIONS – PREFERRED CORE STRATEGY Introduction This document contains details of the representations received following the consultation of the Preferred Core Strategy. The purpose of this document is to fulfil Regulation 27 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amendments) Regulations 2008. This document sets out the following: • Which bodies and persons were invited to make representations under regulation 25; • How those bodies and persons were invited to make such representations; • A summary of the main issues raised by those representations; and • How those main issues have been addressed in the subsequent Core Strategy – the Publication version. The Preferred Core Strategy was published for a consultation period of thirteen weeks on 30 September – 19 December 2008. Letters giving notice of this consultation on the Core Strategy were sent to all contacts on the Central Lancashire joint consultation database, including both statutory and non-statutory consultees. In addition, the Preferred Core Strategy, Preferred Core Strategy comments form, the Sustainability Appraisal and a summary version of the Preferred Core Strategy were made available on the Central Lancashire website, www.centrallancashire.com. Paper copies of the documents were also made available for inspection at the Preston, South Ribble and Chorley Council offices and at local libraries throughout the three areas. In total 604 representations were made to the Preferred Core Strategy from 126 representors. The representations received varied widely in terms of the level of detail, the breadth of issues they covered and their viewpoint of the Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Skills Needs Assessment 2002: Lancashire
    LSC Lancashire Skills Needs Assessment 2002 Introduction Page 1 Chapter 2 Page 3 UK Economic Outlook Page 3 Introduction Employment Structure The Lancashire Economy Page 4 Overview GDP/GVA Earnings House Prices Deprivation Quality of Life Population of Lancashire Historical Change Projected Change Population by Age Ethnic Population Labour Force Working age economic activity Unemployment National and regional comparison Unemployment by district and gender Ward data Unemployment by age Unemployment by duration Chapter 3 – The Supply of Skills Page 16 Young People Page 16 School Provision and Performance School Leaver Destinations Full-Time Education Work Based Learning Non Learners Gender Variations Ethnic Variations Provision of Work Based Learning Training Provider Provision Quality of Provision Provision of Further Education Programmes Travel to Learn areas In Year Retention 6th Form Provision Higher Education Increasing Participation & Retention of Young People Barriers to Learning Increasing Retention Post-16 Achievement Level 2 achievement Level 3 achievement Adults Page 33 Provision of Adult and Community Based Learning Basic Skills Adult Participation Barriers to Learning Increasing Participation of Adults Learning + Skills Council Client Groups Page 39 Ethnic Minorities Lone Parents Teenage Pregnancy Disability Work Based Learning Further Education Disaffected Young People Absence from School Exclusions from Schools Drug Use Amongst Young People Crime Amongst Young People Rural Population Chapter 4 – The Demand for Skills Page 50 Business Structure Page 50 Employment Patterns Page 51 By Sector Manufacturing Construction High Tech Industries By Occupation By Gender Full / Part-Time Employment Wage Levels Skills Issues Page 56 Types of Skills Needed Skill Shortages by Sector & Occupation IiP Employer Survey Page 58 Annexes Key Facts Sheets – by district Introduction Our aim is to make Lancashire a place where learning is valued by all sections of the community and the benefits of learning are enjoyed by individuals, employers and the wider community.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Directory Birmingham 17Th – 21St September 2011
    autumn conference directory birmingham 17th – 21st september 2011 in government on your side www.healthhotel.org.uk Follow us on twitter.com/healthhotel Overall Partner Monday 19th Sept providing free hearing testing at stand 200 Exhibition Hall The Cabaret of Care — where every type of care is crucial 13:00 - 14:00 Jury’s Inn Room 112 Speaker Dr John Pugh MP How can the NHS improve quality during a time of change? 13:00 - 14:00 Jury’s Inn Room 114 Speaker Baroness Northover More Than a Sticking Plaster? Joining up health and care for good 13:00 - 14:00 Jury’s Inn Room 116 Speaker Paul Burstow MP Seamless Care: Whose Job is it Anyway? Who is Accountable? 18:15 - 19:30 Jury’s Inn Room 112 Speaker Baroness Jolly Local Government — Public Health Speed Dating 18:15 - 19:30 Jury’s Inn Room 114 Speaker Dr John Pugh MP THE Health Debate — Will the coalition deliver a better NHS? 20:15 - 21:30 Jury’s Inn Rooms 101/102 Speaker Paul Burstow MP Follow us on twitter using #HealthDebate The Health Hotel Reception — invite only Reception Partner With an address by Paul Burstow MP 21:45 - 23:00 Hyatt, Sonata Tuesday 20th Sept Patient or Doctor — whose fault is late diagnosis? 13:00 – 14:00 Jury’s Inn Room 112 Speaker Baroness Jolly Mind the gap — How can we bring health and social care together in the new NHS? 13:00 – 14:00 Jury’s Inn Room 114 Speaker Paul Burstow MP Additional Health Hotel Members: providing free access to all MPs’ biographies on the Health Hotel Stand If you have a QR code reader on your mobile phone, scan this code for the brings you the Health Hotel Lounge the most up to date information on our events.
    [Show full text]
  • 8605 Mouchel AR08 Ft 11A P1-41 Tp.Indd
    Mouchel Group plc 2008Mouchel Group Report Annual and Accounts Building great relationships 2008 Annual Report and Accounts www.mouchel.com Who we are Mouchel is a consulting and business services group that improves day-to-day life for millions of people by providing the many design, management and operational skills needed to transform essential public services and to sustain vital infrastructure. We provide safer, more reliable roads and railways, better teaching and learning environments, more sustainable energy and waste solutions, cleaner drinking water and more accessible public services. We help our clients find better ways to run their own services and to reap the rewards of better investment in technology and systems. We go the extra mile – and more – to do the right thing for our clients, lead the way in our markets, keep our promises to our people and offer a fair return to our investors. This is Mouchel. This is the way we do business. Building great relationships Mouchel’s business is built upon great relationships – with our customers, our stakeholders and our people. They enable us to provide services that help our clients improve day-to-day life for millions of people… Acknowledgements Mouchel would like to thank all those who participated in producing this report, particularly the members of staff, for their contributions. Cover and main case study photography by Arnhel de Serra. Designed and produced by The College www.thecollege.uk.com Printed in the UK by Royle Corporate Print, a carbon-neutral printing company which is ISO 14001 and FSC certified. This report is printed on Think4 Bright paper, which is FSC certified, 100% ECF (Elemental Chlorine Free) and totally recyclable.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers Sent Home Face Long Wait for Ofsted Pass
    rachel de souza: john roberts: pull-out: Cleared of unions are timeline of allegations not enough reforms Page 6 Page 9 Pages 16 and 17 SCHOOLSWEEK.CO.UK FRIDAY, JANUARY 30, 2015 | EDITION 17 Teachers sent home face long wait for Ofsted pass FREDDIE WHITTAKER visit is necessary. @FCDWHITTAKER Mr Harford admitted that there is now a backlog: “We need to start More than 240 teachers banned from moving into the applications, which the classroom because they live with currently sit at around 300. We are someone who has been convicted working our way through those as IS THIS THE of a violent or sexual offence are quickly as we can to ensure there is facing a long wait to see if they can minimal disruption.” return to teaching, following a rise in Pushing Mr Harford on how long the BEST SCHOOL applications. reviews would take, committee chair Just 17 of the 259 applications to Ofsted Graham Stuart spoke on behalf of those for a disqualification by association currently waiting: “Hundreds of staff, IN ENGLAND? waiver have so far been granted. who personally have done absolutely Ofsted has admitted that 242 people nothing wrong, but they have a partner who applied for the inspectorate to who perhaps has been guilty of a waive the rule have either failed to violent or sexual crime some time in OUR ‘ALTERNATIVE’ receive a waiver or are still waiting for the past - it could have been a long time their applications to be processed. ago - are all off work.” LEAGUE TABLES The number came to light after In one high-profile case, Katherine P5 Ofsted schools director Sean Harford Kerner, acting headteacher of Wyborne told the Commons education select Primary School in New Eltham, south committee on Wednesday that while London, returned to work last week the disqualification rules came into after an unknown period on enforced force in 2009, guidance to schools issued paid leave after her 44-year-old by the Department for Education (DfE) husband, also a teacher, was convicted last October had sparked an increase in of having sex with a 16-year-old pupil.
    [Show full text]
  • DIUS Register Final Version
    Register of Education and Training Providers as last maintained by the Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills on the 30 March 2009 College Name Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 Postcode Telephone Email 12 training 1 Sherwood Place, 153 Sherwood DrivBletchley, Milton Keynes Bucks MK3 6RT 0845 605 1212 [email protected] 16 Plus Team Ltd Oakridge Chambers 1 - 3 Oakridge Road BROMLEY BR1 5QW 1st Choice Training and Assessment Centre Ltd 8th Floor, Hannibal House Elephant & Castle London SE1 6TE 020 7277 0979 1st Great Western Train Co 1st Floor High Street Station Swansea SA1 1NU 01792 632238 2 Sisters Premier Division Ltd Ram Boulevard Foxhills Industrial Estate SCUNTHORPE DN15 8QW 21st Century I.T 78a Rushey Green Catford London SE6 4HW 020 8690 0252 [email protected] 2C Limited 7th Floor Lombard House 145 Great Charles Street BIRMINGHAM B3 3LP 0121 200 1112 2C Ltd Victoria House 287a Duke Street, Fenton Stoke on Trent ST4 3NT 2nd City Academy City Gate 25 Moat Lane Digbeth, Birmingham B5 5BD 0121 622 2212 2XL Training Limited 662 High Road Tottenham London N17 0AB 020 8493 0047 [email protected] 360 GSP College Trident Business Centre 89 Bickersteth Road London SW17 9SH 020 8672 4151 / 084 3E'S Enterprises (Trading) Ltd Po Box 1017 Cooks Lane BIRMINGHAM B37 6NZ 5 E College of London Selby Centre Selby Road London N17 8JL 020 8885 3456 5Cs Training 1st Floor Kingston Court Walsall Road CANNOCK WS11 0HG 01543 572241 6S Consulting Limited c/o 67 OCEAN WHARF 60 WESTFERRY ROAD LONDON E14 8JS 7city Learning Ltd 4 Chiswell
    [Show full text]
  • New Landscape of Policing
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee New Landscape of Policing Fourteenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 September 2011 Published on 23 September 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West and Abingdon) James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Michael Ellis MP (Conservative, Northampton North) Lorraine Fullbrook MP (Conservative, South Ribble) Dr Julian Huppert MP (Liberal Democrat, Cambridge) Steve McCabe MP (Labour, Birmingham Selly Oak) Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour & Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Mark Reckless MP (Conservative, Rochester and Strood) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament. Mr Aidan Burley MP (Conservative, Cannock Chase) Mary Macleod MP (Conservative, Brentford and Isleworth) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/homeaffairscom.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Enterprise Partnership Chairs – Biographies 2021
    Local Enterprise Partnership Chairs – Biographies 2021 Tom Westley DL Andrew Smith Black Country LEP Buckinghamshire LEP Tom is Chairman of the Westley Andrew always wanted to work in the film Group, one of Europe’s largest industry, then after being a civil servant, copper-based alloy foundry and having a stint in politics, starting up his own engineering groups consisting of five business and training to be a scuba diving brands: Spunalloys, Walter Frank, instructor, his dream came true and he Francis W Birkett, Westleys, JT Price went to work for Pinewood in 2008. and Meighs Ltd. The group employs more than 300 people and has a As Director of Corporate Affairs, Andrew turnover in excess of €30 million. has been instrumental in the development of the Pinewood site and development of Tom is the Board Lead on Enterprise the international reputation of the studio Zones and Chair of the Enterprise and in particular in developing strong Zones Management Steering Group. investment links. He is also a member of the Funding Applications Sub-Group and a LEP representative on the Black Country Joint Advisory Group. A Board member of Buckinghamshire LEP since 2012, Andrew has been instrumental in guiding and supporting the growth of the LEP and his In 2017, Tom was made Deputy Lieutenant to Her Majesty’s Lord Lieutenant knowledge of the film and creative arts sector has been invaluable in the for the West Midlands. development of this growth area for Buckinghamshire. Andrew is also a non- executive Director of Buckinghamshire Business First. He is passionate about allowing everybody opportunity, especially the long- term unemployed and NEETs.
    [Show full text]
  • Pink Cover & ISBN Sheet
    Central Lancashire City Region Sub-Regional Strategy First Detailed Proposals Prepared for: The North West Regional Assembly This document has been prepared by the Joint Authorities of Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council, Blackpool Borough Council and Lancashire County Council. © The Joint Advisory Committee for Strategic Planning Lancashire County Council, Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council, Blackpool Borough Council ISBN 1 8999 07 912 Copies of this document are available from: Adrian Smith, Lancashire County Council, Environment Directorate, PO Box 9, Guild House, Cross Street. PRESTON. PR1 8RD [email protected] Tel: 01772-534160 Fax: 01772-533898 www.lancashire2016.com March 2005 Text is available in large format on request Central Lancashire City Region: Sub-Regional Strategy (First Detailed Proposals) Contents Page List of Tables iii List of Figures iii 1. Introduction 5 2. The Central Lancashire City Region: Key Facts 7 3. Issues up to 2021 15 4. Vision and Objectives 21 5. Developing the Preferred Strategy 23 6. Developing the City Region Concept in Lancashire 35 7. Proposals Submitted to the North West Regional Assembly 43 A: A Strategy for Sustainable Economic Growth 43 B: Connectivity and Accessibility 45 C: Polycentric Growth 46 D: Planning Principles for Accommodating and Cascading Growth 51 E: Interventions: Removing Barriers to Growth 58 F: 'Saved Policies' from the Joint Lancashire Structure Plan 2001-2016 65 8. Conclusions 67 Appendices A The Brief 69 B Consultation 74 C Lancashire Districts' Outlook 76 D Technical Data 92 E Criteria for identifying business sites 94 The Ordnance Survey mapping included within this document is provided by Lancashire Councty Council under licence from the Ordnance Survey in order to fulfil its public function to make available Council held public domain information.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template
    Roger Tym & Partners t: 0116 249 3970 3 Museum Square e: 0116 249 3971 Leicester e: [email protected] LE1 6UF w: www.tymconsult.com Part of Peter Brett Associates LLP South Ribble Technical Note on Assumption Inputs Final Report 24 October 2011 / October 2012 Unless alternative contractual arrangements have been made, this report remains the property of Roger Tym & Partners until fees have been paid in full. Copyright and other intellectual property laws protect this information. Reproduction or retransmission of the information, in whole or in part, in any manner, without the prior written consent of the copyright holder, is a violation of copyright law. Job Number 25501-002 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 Residential Sales Values ..................................................................................................... 1 Non-Residential Uses .......................................................................................................... 2 Town Centre Offices ............................................................................................................ 3 Business Park Offices ......................................................................................................... 3 Large Industrial and Warehouses ........................................................................................ 4 Small Industrial Workshops ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]