DOCSLIB.ORG

History of Aesthetics 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History of Aesthetics 1 History of Aesthetics 1 Karsten Harries History of Aesthetics Lecture Notes Fall Semester 2012 Yale University Copyright Karsten Harries History of Aesthetics 2 Contents I. Introduction 1. Does Art Still Matter? 3 II. Plato 2. Beauty as the Object of Love 12 3. Art as a Gift 21 4. Beauty and Truth 29 5. Socrates' Critique of the Poets 39 III. Aristotle 6. Art as Human Work 46 7. The Mimetic Character of Art 53 8. Tragedy 59 9. Ontological and Aesthetic Conceptions of Art 68 10. Beauty as the Epiphany of Form 75 IV. Kant 11. The Turn to Modern Aesthetics 82 12. Kant's System, Critique of Judgment, Introduction 89 13. Kant's Critique of Empiricism 97 14. Kant's Critique of Rationalism 104 15. The Sublime 112 16. The Creation of the Work of Art: The Aesthetic Idea 121 17. Genius and Taste 127 V. Hegel 18. Hegel on the Future of Art 134 19. Hegel's Determination of the Essence of Art 141 20. Towards a Philosophy of the History of Art 147 21. Tales of the End of Art 15 VI. Heidegger 22. Artwork, Equipment, Thing 163 23. Art as an Establishment of the World 171 24. Art as a Presentation of the Earth 177 25. Art and Truth 183 VII. Conclusion 26. Art Matters 191 History of Aesthetics 3 1. Introduction: Dos Art Still Matter? 1 Some time ago the New York Times mourned in an editorial the tragedy that just now, when the arts are flourishing in America they are yet “seriously threatened by a shortage of funds and support.” It is a lament that tends to return whenever either economic conditions or government policy has caused public support for the arts to dry up. The editorial went on to claim that "the arts are clearly one of this country's major strengths and sources of vitality." Predictably it concluded with an appeal for public support of the arts. I would like to agree with the sentiments expressed in that editorial. Yet they do not seem to me at all obvious. Nor are they easily defended. Are the arts really flourishing today? The art market would seem to suggest a positive answer: Hardly a month passes without news of an artwork fetching a new record sum at some auction. Is this a sign of artistic vitality? Today’s most discussed artists, say a Jeff Koons or a Damien Hirst, hardly seem in need of government support. And there is that other question: Do we really need art? How can one justify spending time and money on art as long as there are more pressing needs? Should millions be spent on one painting as long as the money could be spent to alleviate human suffering or to help make this world a better place? How can there be a justification of such expenditures? How can one defend government support of the arts, as long as disease, hunger, and lacking educational opportunities remain a problem. And finally, is it in fact clear that the arts are “one of this country's major strengths and sources of vitality”? Once more I invite you to think of the art of Jeff Koons? Does his art really matter? To whom? And why? To the general public? Just what are we thinking of when we claim that art is desperately in need of public support? And if there is indeed a sense in which art is very much in need of public support, does this not suggest, that despite all the rhetoric, such art is not very much in demand. That is to say, the need for support in that case would not be based on public demand. Art that for whatever reason is in demand would seem to support itself today quite well. History of Aesthetics 4 The market sees to that. That is as true of Jeff Koons and Damien Hirst as it was of Thomas Kinkade, who practiced a very different art. But this is presumably not the kind of art that the editorial was thinking of. But what kind of art was it thinking of? Presupposed, at any rate, seems to be a distinction between commercially successful, popular art and art in some other, perhaps higher sense that is in need of public support — perhaps we should speak here of ART. But in what if any sense can this ART be said to be one of this country's major strengths? What examples could one give? Who cares about it? What does art matter? 2 What was asserted in that editorial should be compared with Tom Wolfe's now dated, but still illuminating book The Painted Word, which offered a sketch of what was when he wrote it, in 1975, the contemporary art scene. Much of what Wolfe then wrote still rings true. Art and the general public, Wolfe suggested, are linked today mostly by mutual indifference; while the general public is not paying much attention to what is going on in the ART WORLD, the world in which Koons and Hirst today are leading figures, that world is unconcerned about the general public. Let me read a few lines from The Painted Word: Public? The public plays no part in this process whatsoever. The public is not invited (it gets a printed announcement later). The notion that the public accepts or rejects anything in Modern Art, the notion that the public scorns, ignores, fails to comprehend, allows to wither, crushes the spirit of, or commits any other crime against Art or the individual artist is merely a romantic fiction, a bittersweet Trilby sentiment. The game is completed and the trophies distributed long before the public knows what has happened... The public is presented with a fait accompli and receives the aforementioned printed announcement, usually in the form of a story or a spread of color pictures in the back of Time. An announcement, I say. Not even the most powerful organs of the press, including Time, Newsweek, and the New York Times, can discover a new artist or certify his work and make it stick. They can only bring you the news, tell you what artists the beau hamlet, Cultureburg, has discovered and certified.1 1 Harper's Magazine, April 1975 2 Jacques Maritain, Art and Scholasticism. With Other Essays, tr. J. F. Scanlan (New History of Aesthetics 5 Small wonder then that the public should show little concern whether such art thrives or not. Tom Wolfe's sketch of the art scene, including the artists and a small well to do elite, restricted to eight cities in five countries, distorts. Modern art is not quite as removed from the public as Tom Wolfe's caricature suggests. Still, like any good caricature, the distortion has its point. We cannot overlook the distance that separates the modern art world from the general public, the split between popular art and the art that matters to the art world. For the general public the latter holds little interest. 3 It would be a mistake to think that this is how things have always been, that there has always been a small wealthy elite interested in what was then taken to be serious art, and a mostly indifferent public, which had its popular art; that today’s cultureburg had its predecessors in the courts of Baroque Europe and the art-obsessed merchant elite of the Renaissance. We only have to consider the culture of the Baroque to realize that as late as the eighteenth century art had a public importance that we no longer grant it. For most of us art has no more than a peripheral significance. What truly matters lies elsewhere. The distance that separates ART from the general public is just one sign of this. Another is the widespread tendency to connect ART with the past. When asked to think of the great artists, whom do you think of? Rembrandt and Van Gogh, Bach and Beethoven, Homer and Shakespeare. Faced with the art of our own time we quickly become unsure. Everything important seems to have been done, the vocabulary of art exhausted, attempts to develop new vocabularies more interesting than convincing. Think once more of Jeff Koons. This is not at all a new feeling. More than a hundred and fifty years ago Hegel lectured that from the side of its highest vocation art is for us something past. Today this assumption seems anything but farfetched. But do such dire pronouncements not do violence to the lively artistic scene that surrounds us? And isn't it always more difficult to do justice to the artistic life of the present than to what has already been created and has come to be taken for granted? And hasn't Hegel's gloomy pronouncement been defeated by the explosive development of the History of Aesthetics 6 arts since his day, that is to say by the whole development of modern art. Think of all that has happened in the world of art since Hegel lectured on the death of art in the l820's! Van Gogh, Picasso, Jackson Pollock, Andy Warhol. Yet before we can decide whether this development refutes Hegel, we have to try to understand what is being asserted: Hegel never meant to assert that in the future there would no longer be art, artists, and people passionately interested in art. What he argued for was rather that the shape of our modern, reflective culture can no longer grant art that role and importance that it had for the Greeks, or for the Middle Ages, or, in many parts of Europe, still for the Eighteenth Century.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Course Outline in PDF Format
    POLS 3040.6 Modern Political Thought 2010/11 Course Website: http://moodle10.yorku.ca You will need your Passport York to sign in, then you will be directed to POLS 3040.6 course website. Class Time: Wednesday 11:30-14:30 Class Location: TEL 1005 Professor: Shannon Bell Office Location: S 634 Ross E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.arts.yorku.ca/politics/shanbell/index.html Telephone Office: 416 2100 ext. 22552 Office Hours: Tues 15:00-17:00 Mobile: 416 822 6831 Wed 15:00-17:00 Course Description POLS 3040.6 Modern Political Thought meshes political theory with digital imagery. The course operationalizes Gilles Deleuze claim that philosophical concepts are like sounds, images and colors. This will be accomplished through digital image/sound production of theoretical concepts. Film images, which I have videoed will accompany each lecture. Course requirements include two short film productions relating to a theoretical concept; the films accompany the two essays. I have scheduled extra office hours to assist with the film aspect of the course which is 15% of the grade. It is assumed that people do not have any film experience. The idea is to transpose Martin Heidegger’s claim regarding technology, ‘that you can’t think technology technologically,’ to the techne of political thought. The argument is that you can’t think political theory simply with language, that is, inside the sayable in which it is produced. Heidegger contended that the site from which to think technology is art. POLS 3040 uses visual images to supplement and enhance philosophical concepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel's Introduction to Aesthetics
    Hegel’s Introduction to Aesthetics 1 Karsten Harries Hegel's Introduction to Aesthetics Fall Semester 2009 Yale University Copyright Karsten Harries Hegel’s Introduction to Aesthetics 2 Contents 1. Introduction: Hegel on the Death of Art 3 2. Danto on the End of Art 15 3. Art and Nature 37 4. Art and Theory 50 5. Towards a Science of Art 60 6. The Work of Art as an Artifact 78 7. The Sensuousness of Art 85 8. Art and Imitation 96 9. Why Art in a Needy Age? 104 10. Hegel and his Predecessors 119 11. Irony 128 12. The Division of the Arts 137 13. Conclusion: The History and End of Art 148 Hegel’s Introduction to Aesthetics 3 1. Introduction: Hegel on the Death of Art 1 In the Spring semester of 2008 I taught, for the last time, a seminar on Heidegger's The Origin of the Work of Art. A reworked version of my class notes has just been published as a book by Springer.1 In my mind that seminar and this seminar on Hegel, while they do not depend on each other, belong together. What joins them is most fundamentally the question of the place of art in the modern world. Both seminars are part of an attempt to work out in more detail the concluding chapter of my The Ethical Function of Architecture,2 which confronts Hegel with Heidegger. What is at issue in this confrontation is hinted at by some remarks Heidegger makes in the Epilogue to The Origin of the Work of Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger, Being and Time
    Heidegger's Being and Time 1 Karsten Harries Heidegger's Being and Time Seminar Notes Spring Semester 2014 Yale University Heidegger's Being and Time 2 Copyright Karsten Harries [email protected] Heidegger's Being and Time 3 Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Ontology and Fundamental Ontology 16 3. Methodological Considerations 30 4. Being-in-the-World 43 5. The World 55 6. Who am I? 69 7. Understanding, Interpretation, Language 82 8. Care and Truth 96 9. The Entirety of Dasein 113 10. Conscience, Guilt, Resolve 128 11. Time and Subjectivity 145 12. History and the Hero 158 13. Conclusion 169 Heidegger's Being and Time 4 1. Introduction 1 In this seminar I shall be concerned with Heidegger's Being and Time. I shall refer to other works by Heidegger, but the discussion will center on Being and Time. In reading the book, some of you, especially those with a reading knowledge of German, may find the lectures of the twenties helpful, which have appeared now as volumes of the Gesamtausgabe. Many of these have by now been translated. I am thinking especially of GA 17 Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung (1923/24); Introduction to Phenomenological Research, trans. Daniel O. Dahlstrom (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2005) GA 20 Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs (1925); History of the Concept of Time, trans. Theodore Kisiel (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1985) GA 21 Logik. Die Frage nach der Wahrheit (1925/26). Logic: The Question of Truth, trans. Thomas Sheehan GA 24 Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (1927); The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, trans.
    [Show full text]
  • Marx and Art: Use, Value, Poetry
    CONTINENTAL THOUGHT & THEORY: A JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM Marx and Art: Use, Value, Poetry Volume 1 | Issue 4: 150 years of Capital 587-615 | ISSN: 2463-333X Marx and Art: Use, Value, Poetry Ali Alizadeh Abstract: Despite Karl Marx’s overwhelming focus on economics and politics – culminating in Capital: Critique of Political Economy – his philosophy has inspired an array of Marxist or Marxian theories regarding the arts. Yet, the key tenet of these theories has not been Marx’s radical emphasis on the foundational role of production in human subjectivity. Marxist theories of art have, generally speaking, either examined the arts’ capacity for signifying social relations and class struggle – as seen in many a Marxists’ penchant for realism – or they have seen the arts as little more than aesthetic legitimations of ruling class ideology, a view which, in its most positive manifestation, can be found in the experimental and modernist tendency to undermine the morals and mores of the bourgeoisie by committed artists. Neither of these approaches, at any rate, sees art as a form and outcome of production in itself. In this article, I wish to present a Marxian theory of art, based on Marx’s entire oeuvre, from his earliest journalistic writings to Capital, which presents art as neither an aesthetic mimesis nor an ideological alibi of production. I would like to propose that for Marx art was, first and foremost, a use-value produced by concrete human labour. Keywords: art, Marx, value, use, labour 587 CONTINENTAL THOUGHT & THEORY: A JOURNAL
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Hegel's Theory of Tragedy
    Introduction to Hegel’s Theory of Tragedy MARK W. ROCHE Next to Aristotle’s account of tragedy, the theory of tragedy developed by the German philosopher G. W. F. Hegel (1770-1831) has become the most studied and quoted in the West. Tragedy arises, according to Hegel, when a hero courageously asserts a substantial and just position, but in doing so simultaneously violates a contrary and likewise just position and so falls prey to a one-sidedness that is defined at one and the same time by greatness and by guilt. Tragedy surfaces as a topic in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Mind and his Lectures on the Philosophy of History, arguably his two best known works in the Anglo-American world. In chapter five of the Phenomenology Hegel discusses character, ethical action, and guilt partly by way of an analysis of Sophocles’ Antigone. In his introduction to the Lectures on the Philosophy of History Hegel analyzes the world-historical individual who shapes history often beyond her conscious intentions; such figures emerge ahead of their time, come into conflict with their ages, and prepare a new world. In his Lectures on the History of Philosophy Hegel offers a fascinating portrait of Socrates in the light of this tragic dialectic. Also in his Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion Hegel touches on tragedy, especially in the Greek world and in relation to reconciliation. Tragedy is most prominent in Hegel’s Lectures on Aesthetics, which is one of his most accessible texts. The Aesthetics, which was compiled and edited by Hegel’s student Heinrich PhaenEx 1, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Embodied Meaning and Art As Sense-Making: a Critique of Beiser’S Interpretation of the ‘End of Art Thesis’ 1
    Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics Volume 9, 2017 Edited by Dan-Eugen Ratiu and Connell Vaughan Published by the European Society for Aesthetics esa Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics Founded in 2009 by Fabian Dorsch Internet: http://proceedings.eurosa.org Email: [email protected] ISSN: 1664 – 5278 Editors Dan-Eugen Ratiu (Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca) Connell Vaughan (Dublin Institute of Technology) Editorial Board Zsolt Bátori (Budapest University of Technology and Economics) Alessandro Bertinetto (University of Udine) Matilde Carrasco Barranco (University of Murcia) Daniel Martine Feige (Stuttgart State Academy of Fine Arts) Francisca Pérez Carreño (University of Murcia) Kalle Puolakka (University of Helsinki) Isabelle Rieusset-Lemarié (University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Karen Simecek (University of Warwick) John Zeimbekis (University of Patras) Publisher The European Society for Aesthetics Department of Philosophy University of Fribourg Avenue de l’Europe 20 1700 Fribourg Switzerland Internet: http://www.eurosa.org Email: [email protected] Proceedings of the European Society f or Aesthetics Volume 9, 2017 Edit ed by D an - Eugen Ratiu and Connell Vaughan Table of Contents Claire Anscomb Does a Mechanistic Etiology Reduce Artistic Agency? ... 1 Emanuele Arielli Aesthetic Opacity ................................ ........................ 15 Zsolt Bátori The Ineffability of Musical Content : Is Verbalisation in Principle Impossible ? ................................ ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel and the Myth of the Accessibility of the Lectures on the Philosophy of History
    Hegel and the LPH Myth 1 Running head: HEGEL AND THE LPH MYTH Hegel and the Myth of the Accessibility of the Lectures on the Philosophy of History Adam Myers A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2008 Hegel and the LPH Myth 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ Craig Q. Hinkson, Ph.D. Chairman of Thesis ______________________________ Thomas A. Provenzola, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Michael A. Babcock, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Brenda Ayres, Ph.D. Assistant Honors Director ______________________________ Date Hegel and the LPH Myth 3 Abstract Hegel's Lectures on the Philosophy of History (hereafter LPH) has been often hailed as his most accessible work. I wish to argue that, even if it were at one point in time the best entrée to Hegel's thought, it is no longer. More specifically, I argue that the claim that it is still his most accessible work needs retooling. To do this, I have set up three criteria for what it means for a work to be accessible: authenticity, self-containedness, and navigability. The criterion of authenticity simply states that the more authorial integrity a work has, the more accessible it is; that of self-containedness demands that a work be relatively understandable in itself; and that of navigability demands that an accessible work help the reader navigate in further studies of the same author.
    [Show full text]
  • Running out of Space? Architecture and the Need for a Post-Copernican Geocentrism" February 23, 2017, Yale University
    Geocentrism 1 "Running out of Space? Architecture and The Need for a Post-Copernican Geocentrism" February 23, 2017, Yale University 1 For many years I taught a course called The Philosophy of Architecture. That I taught this course at all was the result of conversations with Kent Bloomer, who suggested, many years ago, that the undergraduate major could use such a course. Before then I had been teaching a course called The Philosophy of Modern Art. The Meaning of Modern Art, published in 1968, was the result of that course. That book was quite successful. After all these years it is still in print. But with its appearance I lost some of my interest in that course, and so I was quite ready to respond to Kent Bloomer’s invitation, especially so since my interest in architecture goes back to my childhood. That course, too, finally resulted in a Book, The Ethical Function of Architecture. It, too, has been successful. It was just honored with a second Festschrift. But, again, with the appearance of the book I lost some of my interest in the course, although I did teach it for one last time in the fall. But I have kept thinking and lecturing about architecture. Not that I have changed my position in any fundamental way. But circumstances have changed; the world has changed. More especially, the way we relate to space has changed and continues to change. Our understanding of space has changed; and since architecture may be understood as the art of bounding space that suggests that our understanding of architecture, too, will have changed.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE ROBERT B. PIPPIN Evelyn Stefansson Nef Distinguished Service Professor in the John U. Nef Committ
    CURRICULUM VITAE ROBERT B. PIPPIN Evelyn Stefansson Nef Distinguished Service Professor in the John U. Nef Committee on Social Thought, the Department of Philosophy, and the College The University of Chicago The John U. Nef Committee on Social Thought 1130 East 59th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 The Department of Philosophy 1115 E. 58th St. Chicago, IL 60637 (773) 702-5453 FAX: (773) 834-1968 email: [email protected] website: http://home.uchicago.edu/~rbp1/ Education B.A. with Honors in English, Trinity College, Hartford, Conn. 1970 M.A. Philosophy (Minor: Greek), Pennsylvania State University 1972 Ph.D. Philosophy, Pennsylvania State University, August 31, 1974 Honors, Awards, Endowed Lectures, Prizes 2019 - Guggenheim Fellowship 2019 - Penn State Alumni Association Lifetime Achievement Award 2018 - Penn State Graduate School Distinguished Alumnus Award 2018 (winter) – Steiner Lecture, St. John’s College, Santa Fe, New Mexico 2018 (spring) – Kneller Lecture, Philosophy of Education Society, Chicago, Illinois 2019 (winter) – Penn State Alumni Fellow Award 2017 (fall) – Alumni Association of Penn State Lifetime Achievement Award 2017 (fall) – Thomas Scholl Lecture, Purdue University Philosophy Department 2017 (fall) – Friedrich Nietzsche Lecture (Inaugural), University of Basel, Switzerland 2017 (spring) – elected to the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina 2016 (fall) – Townsend Visitor (three lectures), University of California, Berkeley 2015 (fall) – Suarez Lecture, Fordham University 2015 (fall) - Larwill Lecture, Kenyon
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Aesthetics After Adorno
    The Townsend Pa P e r s i n T h e h u m a n i T i e s No. 3 Art and Aesthetics After Adorno Jay M. Bernstein Claudia Brodsky Anthony J. Cascardi Thierry de Duve Aleš Erjavec Robert Kaufman Fred Rush Art and Aesthetics After Adorno The Townsend Pa P e r s i n T h e h u m a n i T i e s No. 3 Art and Aesthetics After Adorno J. M. Bernstein Claudia Brodsky Anthony J. Cascardi Thierry de Duve Aleš Erjavec Robert Kaufman Fred Rush Published by The Townsend Center for the Humanities University of California | Berkeley Distributed by University of California Press Berkeley, Los Angeles, London | 2010 Copyright ©2010 The Regents of the University of California ISBN 978-0-9823294-2-9 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Art and aesthetics after Adorno / J. M. Bernstein...[et al]. p. cm. — (The Townsend papers in the humanities ; no. 3) ISBN 978-0-9823294-2-9 1. Aesthetics, Modern—20th century 2. Aesthetics, Modern—21st century 3. Adorno, Theodor W., 1903–1969. Ästhetische Theorie. I. Bernstein, J. M. BH201.A78 2010 111’.850904—dc22 2010018448 Inquiries concerning proposals for the Townsend Papers in the Humanities from Berkeley faculty and Townsend Center affiliates should be addressed to The Townsend Papers, 220 Stephens Hall, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720- 2340, or by email to [email protected]. Design and typesetting: Kajun Graphics Manufactured in the United States of America Credits and acknowledgements for quoted material appear on page 180–81.
    [Show full text]
  • Kitsch and Contemporary Culture
    Kitsch and contemporary culture Bert Olivier Philosophy, Centre for Advanced Studies, University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] This paper addresses the question of kitsch by interpreting it as :'bad" a:t of a partic~lar kind. It draws mainl~, but not exclusively, on Karsten Harries's phenomenological exploratIOn of kItsch to pr?vIde a. framewor~ from whIch to approach kitsch in contemporary (postmodern) culture. It is shown that, by u.ncovenng attnb~tes of kItsch su~h as the self-enjoyment of the spectator and lack of reflective distance, Harries provIdes valuable pomters for assessmg what is ultimately the anaesthetizing political function of kitsch in contemporary culture. Kitsch is one of the major problems of the remembered and the sentimentalism which present. This claim may seem far-fetched to pervades it (that is, the wallowing in the some people, especially to those who take a feelings that accomp-any the memories). certain delight in "art objects" which do not The point is that kitsch manifests itself hide their status as "kitsch", like a "retro"­ whenever feelings seem to have lost their telephone in the shape of a 50s pink Cadillac correlates, their "objects"; whenever the whose roof serves as the receiver. 1 But this world, objects, and even other people, seem is not really surprising - those objects derive to have retreated, to be out of reach, so that their charm from the aura of nostalgia which "enjoyment" is ultimately enjoyment of surrounds them, something that is one's feelings and sensations for their own paradoxically reminiscent of a more sake instead of for the sake of "authentic" era, despite the artificiality of communicating with others or with things in the "art object".
    [Show full text]
  • KOYRÉ, KOJÈVE, and MALABOU SPECULATE on HEGELIAN TIME Rory Jeffs
    PARRHESIA NUMBER 15 • 2012 • 35-53 THE FUTURE OF THE FUTURE: KOYRÉ, KOJÈVE, AND MALABOU SPECULATE ON HEGELIAN TIME Rory Jeffs … will there and can there be a future after the supposed end of history…. beyond ‘absolute knowledge’? — Jacques Derrida1 The relationship between Hegel’s speculative idealist philosophy and time has a long and complicated history. Since his death in 1831, Hegel’s name has inspired a range of interpretations and speculations about what his philosophy entails. In 1946, the Russian-born French Hegelian Alexandre Kojève speculated: [I]t may be that, in fact the future of the world, and therefore the meaning of the present and the significance of the past, depend, in the final analysis, on the way in which the Hegelian writings are interpreted today.2 Half a century later as we entered the twenty-first century, Catherine Malabou speculated that the future of Hegel depended on how we read the future in Hegel’s philosophy.3 And more recently, Slavoj Žižek in his own typically speculative manner, claimed that even after decades of anti-Hegelian sentiment and a wilful forgetting of Hegel, “Hegel’s century will be the twenty-first.”4 On the surface, such statements seem to place undue importance on Hegel and may confirm the conventional suspicion of him as an all-encompassing philosopher. However, there is also the implication that the future itself, or to loosely paraphrase Malabou, “the future of the future” is what is at stake. Hegel’s value then would be to act as a guide to working out and potentially saving the time of the future itself from insignificance, repetition, or a “levelling down”.5 Žižek may have also intimated something, that Hegel’s time, or future, is yet-to-come—which raises the question of what could have delayed Hegel’s true arrival? I will examine in this article one possible response to such a question that THE FUTURE OF THE FUTURE concerns how the riddle of Hegelian temporality plagued the twentieth-century French reading of Hegel.
    [Show full text]