DOCSLIB.ORG

146 HISTORICAL-ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE AS the BASIS of the THEORETICAL LEVEL of ECONOMIC THINKING Aidar M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
146 HISTORICAL-ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE AS the BASIS of the THEORETICAL LEVEL of ECONOMIC THINKING Aidar M Periódico do Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Gênero e Direito Centro de Ciências Jurídicas - Universidade Federal da Paraíba V. 8 - Nº 04 - Ano 2019 – Special Edition ISSN | 2179-7137 | http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/ged/index 146 HISTORICAL-ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE AS THE BASIS OF THE THEORETICAL LEVEL OF ECONOMIC THINKING Aidar M. Tufetulov1 Gulnara N. Hadiullina2 Rival R. Shakirov3 Andrey S. Zayats4 Abstract: Economic theory as an their position. The paper presents an independent science arose in the period analysis the historical process of of the formation of modern market emergence, development, struggle, and relations. The economic thought history the changing of economic ideas. The as a separate branch in the system of main attention is paid to the analysis of economic sciences took shape in the first the main directions of modern economic half of the XIX century. The tradition of theory underlying the decision-making Russian economic thought at all stages of at macro and microeconomic levels. The its development was attention to content of the historical and economic historical trends and factors of socio- knowledge functions: worldview, economic development. The reason for practical, axiological, factual and this is in the specifics of Russia's methodological, is defined. The socioeconomic and spiritual necessity of studying the provisions of development. ХIХ century is alternative economic schools is characterized by the struggle of old and substantiated, what is considered as a new trends in the economic system of prerequisite for the formation of general Russia. In these conditions, cultural and professional competencies representatives of various branches of of specialists in the field of economics. economic thought appealed to the historical experience of the country and Keywords: History of economic humanity in order to prove the truth of doctrines, economic ideas of the Ancient 1 Kazan Federal University. E-mail: verkbund@gmailcom. Tel. : +7 (906) 3219099. 2 Kazan Federal University. E-mail: verkbund@gmailcom. Tel. : +7 (906) 3219099. 3 Kazan Federal University. E-mail: verkbund@gmailcom. Tel. : +7 (906) 3219099. 4 Kazan Federal University. E-mail: verkbund@gmailcom. Tel. : +7 (906) 3219099. Periódico do Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Gênero e Direito Centro de Ciências Jurídicas - Universidade Federal da Paraíba V. 8 - Nº 04 - Ano 2019 – Special Edition ISSN | 2179-7137 | http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/ged/index 147 East and the ancient world, views were not represented in Soviet mercantilism, marginalism, historiography. Keynesianism, neoliberalism, theory of supply-side economics, 1. Methods The methodological basis of the Introduction study is the works on the economic thought history and economic history of The beginning of market Russia and foreign countries, the reforms in the 90-ies of XXth century fundamental provisions of modern, was marked by a surge of interest in primarily, institutional economic theory, historical and economic knowledge the works of representatives of domestic which began to be used as a source to and foreign economic schools and justify the position of newly emerging trends, work in philosophy, sociology, schools and trends, to confirm (refute) culture, and interdisciplinary socio- the governmental program documents economic research. There are two aimed at implementing structural approaches to historical and economic transformations in society [7; 10]. In this analysis: absolutism and relativism. period, Western economic thought was Absolutism considers the logic of the of particular interest, what has been research subject development, which reflected in numerous studies of the consists in moving from the false to the achievements of foreign economists [3; true, from the simple to the complex. 5; 9]. There was a return of the names of Relativism considers every single theory Russian authors whose works proposed in past eras as a more or less contradicted the principles of the Marxist accurate reflection of socio-economic concept that dominated the conditions of conditions. Relativism in its extreme the administrative economy: N. D. form is represented as a class approach Kondratiev, A. V. Chayanov, G. Ya. according to which the ideas of Sokolnikov, et al. At the same time, economists are a reasonable justification interest grew to the scientific heritage of for class or group interests. At the same N.N. Baransky, N. N. Kolosovsky, N. N. time, the nature of the interrelationships Nekrasov, A. E. Probst, Yu. G. Saushkin within a range of questions where this or and others whose multidimensional that theory or doctrine can make sense is Periódico do Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Gênero e Direito Centro de Ciências Jurídicas - Universidade Federal da Paraíba V. 8 - Nº 04 - Ano 2019 – Special Edition ISSN | 2179-7137 | http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/ged/index 148 ignored. Although every commentator of economic science, since its main the economic thought history can be provisions are the result of not a attributed to one pole or another, yet the theoretical analysis, but a simple positions of modern economists- description of observed phenomena and, historians can not be classified as in part, their classification. unambiguously relativistic or absolutist. In its historical development, The basis for the periodization the mercantilism concept goes through of the world economic thought history is two stages. Early mercantilism its belonging to a certain epoch. The (monetarism) was aimed at solving the periodization proposed in this study is problem of gold accumulation presented in three stages. In accordance nationwide through manipulation in the with specific qualitative changes in the sphere of monetary circulation. The economy, the following stages in the central point of mature mercantilism is development of economic thought are the doctrine of the active trade balance as distinguished: an indispensable condition of national 1. Economic doctrines of the pre- prosperity. Representatives of market economy; mercantilism are T. Men, J. B. Colbert, 2. Economic doctrines and A. de Montchretien. concepts of the era of unregulated market In Russia, mercantilism was economy; realized in the economic policy of Peter 3. Economic concepts of the era of the Great in the first half of the 18th a regulated market economy. century. Adoption of a legislative act permitting the owners of manufactories 2. Results to purchase land with peasants assigned to it, which significantly reduced the The emergence of market costs of production of domestic goods; relations in the Modern times era led to the introduction in 1724 of a the emergence of mercantilism which is protectionist tariff setting customs duties the first attempt in the economic thought to imported industrial goods in the history to substantiate the economic amount of 70-75 percent of the selling policy of a state. Mercantilism is not an price of the goods; monetary reform and the introduction of copper money into Periódico do Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Gênero e Direito Centro de Ciências Jurídicas - Universidade Federal da Paraíba V. 8 - Nº 04 - Ano 2019 – Special Edition ISSN | 2179-7137 | http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/ged/index 149 circulation; the prohibition under the for analysis by representatives of the death penalty of exporting gold and classical school. silver from the country and other steps of Classical economic theory the state aimed at protecting the derives prices from the "natural" norms emerging industry were clearly of remuneration for the three factors of mercantilistic in nature. The ideas of late production which are investigated by mercantilism were reflected in the work three independent sections of a single by I.T. Pososhkov (1652 - 1726) "On system: the rent, capital, and wages poverty and wealth" completed in 1724 theories. Representatives of the classical and intended for Peter the Great. school (U. Petty, A. Smith, D. Ricardo, Classical political economy and others) used the developed analytical arose during the period of the tools, including such methods of establishment of capitalist relations. The economic phenomena analysis as development of manufactory capitalism analysis and synthesis, induction and has led to the fact that the sphere of deduction, the principle of the historical production becomes the main source of and logical unity, etc. profit. Marginalism (translated from Unlike mercantilism, within the the French, "marginal" means the framework of the classical school of "ultimate") is a theory that explains political economy, and for the first time processes and phenomena based on the in the economic thought history, a use of marginal, that is, incremental common basis of science was created: a values of economic indicators, extreme unified theory of production and values or states. In the economic distribution, an analysis of the operation literature, the "marginalist revolution" of these abstract principles on historical means by almost simultaneous but not material, and a number of examples of dependent discovery in the early 70s of their application in economic policy. An XIX century by W. St. Jevons (England, analysis of domestic economic relations Manchester), K. Menger (Austria, comes in place of a superficial Vienna), L. Walras (Switzerland, generalization of economic phenomena Lausanne) of the diminishing marginal within the framework of mercantilism. utility principle. However, in 1878, a Material production became the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Austrian School in Bulgaria: a History✩ Nikolay Nenovsky A,*, Pencho Penchev B
    Russian Journal of Economics 4 (2018) 44–64 DOI 10.3897/j.ruje.4.26005 Publication date: 23 April 2018 www.rujec.org The Austrian school in Bulgaria: A history✩ Nikolay Nenovsky a,*, Pencho Penchev b a University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France b University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria Abstract The main goal of this study is to highlight the acceptance, dissemination, interpretation, criticism and make some attempts at contributing to Austrian economics made in Bulgaria during the last 120 years. We consider some of the main characteristics of the Austrian school, such as subjectivism and marginalism, as basic components of the economic thought in Bulgaria and as incentives for the development of some original theoreti- cal contributions. Even during the first few years of Communist regime (1944–1989), with its Marxist monopoly over intellectual life, the Austrian school had some impact on the economic thought in the country. Subsequent to the collapse of Communism, there was a sort of a Renaissance and rediscovery of this school. Another contribution of our study is that it illustrates the adaptability and spontaneous evolution of ideas in a different and sometimes hostile environment. Keywords: history of economic thought, dissemination of economic ideas, Austrian school, Bulgaria. JEL classification: B00, B13, B30, B41. 1. Introduction The emergence and development of specialized economic thought amongst the Bulgarian intellectuals was a process that occurred significantly slowly in comparison to Western and Central Europe. It also had its specific fea- tures. The first of these was that almost until the outset of the 20th century, the economic theories and different concepts related to them were not well known.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberal Reason and Its Forms: Depoliticisation Through
    Neoliberal Reason and Its Forms: De-Politicisation Through Economisation Yahya M. Madra and Fikret Adaman Department of Economics, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey; [email protected] Abstract: This paper offers a historically contextualised intellectual history of the entangled development of three competing post-war economic approaches, viz the Austrian, Chicago and post-Walrasian schools, as three forms of neoliberalism. Taking our cue from Foucault’s reading of neoliberalism as a mode of governmentality under which the social is organised through “economic incentives”, we engage with the recent discussions of neoliberal theory on three accounts: neoliberalism is read as an epistemic horizon including not only “pro-” but also “post-market” positions articulated by post- Walrasian economists who claim that market failures necessitate the design of “incentive-compatible” remedial mechanisms; the Austrian tradition is distinguished from the Chicago-style pro-marketism; and the implications of the differences among the three approaches on economic as well as socio-political life are discussed. The paper maintains that all three approaches promote the de-politicisation of the social through its economisation albeit by way of different theories and policies. Keywords: Michel Foucault, economisation, Austrian School, Chicago School, post- Walrasian School Introduction More than half a decade after the 2008 Crash and with no end in sight to depressive economic conditions, neoliberal reason displays a certain resiliency. In time, the initial calls for intervention and regulation transformed into austerity programs run by technocratic governments. In the absence of a major redistribution of wealth and income, returning to a New Deal arrangement with well paying secure jobs for all, comprehensive social security, free and quality education, accessible healthcare and active government involvement in social welfare, appears to many a nostalgic indulgence.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging Mercantilism: the Impact of David Hume on the Evolution of Monetary Thought
    Student Economic Review, Vol. 22, 2008 CHALLENGING MERCANTILISM: THE IMPACT OF DAVID HUME ON THE EVOLUTION OF MONETARY THOUGHT ALEXANDER TOFT Senior Sophister Despite its somewhat irrational and outdated nature, mercantilist sentiment is very much alive today. In times of economic slowdown, it often bubbles to the surface of popular economic discourse, threatening to make an unwelcome return to politics and policy. The spirits of mercantilism and protectionism have always gone very much hand in hand. In this paper, Alexander Toft provides an excellent appraisal of David Hume’s monetary thought, in particular examining his attack on the 17th century mercantilist monopoly over economic discourse. Introduction The history of economic thought can be viewed as a series of ideological battles, and key amongst them must rank the debate surrounding the notion that the government has a role to play in ensuring a more favorable balance of trade – what is commonly called mercantilism. Adam Smith is often credited with initiating this debate when he attacked the concept in The Wealth of Nations (Smith, 1776). However, this paper will examine the work of another original detractor from mercantilist thinking, David Hume. A philosopher and historian first and foremost, Hume was also an eminent economist. This paper will argue that through his analysis of the influence of money on inflation and the balance of payments, Hume played a pioneering role in challenging the mercantilist monopoly on economic thought. He contributed towards the development of an alternative theory which centered on free trade, as opposed to a ‘fear of goods’ and ‘love of money’.
    [Show full text]
  • Marginal Revolution
    MARGINAL REVOLUTION It took place in the later half of the 19th century Stanley Jevons in England, Carl Menger in Austria and Leon walras at Lausanne, are generally regarded as the founders of marginalist school Hermann Heinrich Gossen of Germany is considered to be the anticipator of the marginalist school The term ‘Marginal Revolution’ is applied to the writings of the above economists because they made fundamental changes in the apparatus of economic analysis They started looking at some of the important economic problems from an altogether new angle different from that of classical economists Marginal economists has been used to analyse the single firm and its behavior, the market for a single product and the formation of individual prices Marginalism dominated Western economic thought for nearly a century until it was challenged by Keynesian attack in 1936 (keynesian economics shifted the sphere of enquiry from micro economics to macro economics where the problems of the economy as a whole are analysed) The provocation for the emergence of marginalist school was provided by the interpretation of classical doctrines especially the labour theory of value and ricardian theory of rent by the socialists Socialists made use of classical theories to say things which were not the intention of the creators of those theories So the leading early marginalists felt the need for thoroughly revising the classical doctrines especially the theory of value They thought by rejecting the labour theory of value and by advocating the marginal utility theory of value, they could strike at the theoretical basis of socialism Economic Ideas of Marginalist School This school concentrated on the ‘margin’ to explain economic phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Lives of Neoliberalism
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) Book — Published Version Nine Lives of Neoliberalism Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) (2020) : Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, ISBN 978-1-78873-255-0, Verso, London, New York, NY, https://www.versobooks.com/books/3075-nine-lives-of-neoliberalism This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]
  • Schools of Economic Thought (Pdf)
    SCHOOLS OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT A BRIEF HISTORY OF ECONOMICS This isn't really essential to know, but may satisfy the curiosity of many. Mercantilism Economics is said to begin with Adam Smith in 1776. Prior to that, nobody thought of economics, or markets, as an object of study. It is not that they didn't pay attention to economic matters, it is simply that they didn't think of it in any systematic or coherent manner. It was all just off-the-cuff intuition and policy proposals by a myriad of merchants, government officials & journalists, principally in Britain. It is common to denote the period before 1776 as "Mercantilism". It wasn't a coherent school of thought, but a hodge-podge of varying ideas about improving tax revenues, the value & movements of gold and how nations competed for international commerce & colonies. Mostly protectionist, 'war-minded', and all haphazardly argued. (the principal features of the Mercantilist school are discussed in our "Gains from Trade" handout). There was some opposition to Mercantilist doctrines, notably among French and Scottish thinkers (e.g. Pierre de Boisguilbert, Francois Quesnay, Jacques Turgot and David Hume) Classical School The Enlightenment era (mid-1700s) in Europe brought a new spirit of scientific inquiry. Thinkers began looking to apply scientific principles not only to the physical world, but also to human society. In the same spirit that Sir Isaac Newton 'discovered' the "law of gravity" to explain the interaction of natural forces and decipher how the physical world operates, Enlightenment thinkers began trying to discover the "laws" of human interaction, to explain how human society operates.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEOLIBERAL THEORY of SOCIETY Simon Clarke
    THE NEOLIBERAL THEORY OF SOCIETY Simon Clarke The ideological foundations of neo-liberalism Neoliberalism presents itself as a doctrine based on the inexorable truths of modern economics. However, despite its scientific trappings, modern economics is not a scientific discipline but the rigorous elaboration of a very specific social theory, which has become so deeply embedded in western thought as to have established itself as no more than common sense, despite the fact that its fundamental assumptions are patently absurd. The foundations of modern economics, and of the ideology of neoliberalism, go back to Adam Smith and his great work, The Wealth of Nations. Over the past two centuries Smith’s arguments have been formalised and developed with greater analytical rigour, but the fundamental assumptions underpinning neoliberalism remain those proposed by Adam Smith. Adam Smith wrote The Wealth of Nations as a critique of the corrupt and self-aggrandising mercantilist state, which drew its revenues from taxing trade and licensing monopolies, which it sought to protect by maintaining an expensive military apparatus and waging costly wars. The theories which supported the state conceived of exchange as a ‘zero-sum game’, in which one party’s gain was the other party’s loss, so the maximum benefit from exchange was to be extracted by force and fraud. The fundamental idea of Smith’s critique was that the ‘wealth of the nation’ derived not from the accumulation of wealth by the state, at the expense of its citizens and foreign powers, but from the development of the division of labour. The division of labour developed as a result of the initiative and enterprise of private individuals and would develop the more rapidly the more such individuals were free to apply their enterprise and initiative and to reap the corresponding rewards.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation and the Marginalist Revolution
    Florida Law Review Volume 71 Issue 2 Article 4 Regulation and the Marginalist Revolution Herbert Hovenkamp Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons Recommended Citation Herbert Hovenkamp, Regulation and the Marginalist Revolution, 71 Fla. L. Rev. 455 (). Available at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol71/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Law Review by an authorized editor of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hovenkamp: Regulation and the Marginalist Revolution REGULATION AND THE MARGINALIST REVOLUTION Herbert Hovenkamp* Abstract The marginalist revolution in economics became the foundation for the modern regulatory State with its “mixed” economy. For the classical political economists, value was a function of past averages. Marginalism substituted forward looking theories based on expectations about firm and market performance. Marginalism swept through university economics, and by 1920 or so virtually every academic economist was a marginalist. This Article considers the historical influence of marginalism on regulatory policy in the United States. My view is at odds with those who argue that marginalism saved capitalism by rationalizing it as a more defensible buttress against incipient socialism. While marginalism did permit economists and policy makers to strike a middle ground between laissez faire and socialism, the “middle ground” tilted very strongly toward public control. Ironically, regulation plus private ownership was able to go much further in the United States than socialism ever could because it preserved the rhetoric of capital as privately owned, even as it deprived firms of many of the most important indicia of ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • Embedded Mercantilism and Open Regionalism: the Crisis of a Regional Political Project
    Third World Quarterly, Vol 24, No 2, pp 339–355, 2003 Embedded mercantilism and open regionalism: the crisis of a regional political project KANISHKA JAYASURIYA ABSTRACT This paper advances the argument that moves towards regional integration need to be understood as ‘regional governance projects’ undertaken by domestic actors and coalitions. Regional political projects—such as open regionalism—have roots in domestic structures, and it is this which defines the broad configuration of the regional political economy. On the basis of this frame- work the paper suggests, first, that the strategy of open regionalism was con- tingent on a particular configuration of power and interests in the domestic and external economy (embedded mercantilism). Second, this system of embedded mercantilism depended on a set of domestic coalitions between tradeable and non-tradeable sectors of the economy. The non-tradeable sector in Southeast Asia was entrenched within a particular system of political patronage. Third, the Asian crisis and other structural changes in the international economy have made these domestic coalitions less sustainable, thereby creating opportunities for new forms of regional governance projects. Strategies of regional integration as political projects Open regionalism, in terms of the conceptual framework advanced in this paper, is not so much a strategy of economic liberalisation as a regional regime of political economy that encompasses a set of institutions, domestic coalitional structures and international strategies. The nature of regional integration in East Asia, it will be argued, needs to be understood in the context of the manner in which domestic structures have underpinned a particular project of regional integration that goes under the rubric of open regionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Economic Thought
    History of economic thought The term economics was coined around 1870 and popularized by Alfred Marshall, as a substitute for the earlier term political economy which has been used through the 18-19th centuries, with Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Karl Marx as its main thinkers and which today is frequently referred to as the "classical" economic theory. Both economy and economics are derived from the Greek oikos- for "house" or "settlement", and nomos for "laws" or "norms". Economic thought may be roughly divided into three phases: Premodern (Greek, Roman, Arab), Early modern (mercantilist, physiocrats) and Modern (since Adam Smith in the late 18th century). Systematic economic theory has been developed mainly since the birth of the modern era. Premodern economic thought Several ancient philosophers made various economic observations. Among them Aristotle is probably the most important. Mediaeval Arabs also made contributions to the understanding of economics. In particular, Ibn Khaldun of Tunis (1332-1406) wrote on economic and political theory in his Prolegomena, showing for example, how population density is related to the division of labour which leads to economic growth and so in turn to greater population in a virtuous circle. Early Western precursors of economics engaged in the scholastics theological debates during the middle ages. An important topic of discussion was the determination of the just price of a good. In the religious wars following the Reformation in the 16th century, ideas about free trade appeared, later formulated in legal terms by Hugo de Groot or Grotius (Mare liberum). Economic policy in Europe during the late middle ages and early renaissance treated economic activity as a good which was to be taxed to raise revenues for the nobility and the church.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Economics 446-01 History of Economic Thought
    Economics 446-01 History of Economic Thought Spring 2021 Professor Clyde Haulman Office: Tyler 423 Tele: 757-221-2365 email: [email protected] Office Hours: On Zoom Mondays 3:30PM EST and 8:00PM EST and by appointment COURSE OBJECTIVES “...the ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood.” In reality, even practical people “... are usually the slaves of some defunct economists.” With these words, John Maynard Keynes provides a rational for this course. Economic ideas have indeed played a critical role in shaping the world we know and they have day to day impacts on the lives of people everywhere. Understanding the origins of these ideas and how they have developed and transformed into the foundations of the current state of economic analysis is the purpose of this course. Studying the primary works of the some of the ‘giants’ of economics (as well as the works of some lesser giants), we will consider how economic ideas, analysis, and method have both changed and remained the same over time. We will focus on four major ‘schools’ of economic thought -- Classical, Marxian, Neo-Classical, and Keynesian. Classical political economy emerged in the late eighteenth century as an important component of Enlightenment thinking. In part, it developed in response to government intervention in the economy, and its proponents provided theories and policies for commercial and industrial capitalism as well as for the emerging market revolution. The Classical school is represented by the work of Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, David Ricardo and John Stuart Mill.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance and Class in the Marginalist Revolution Yair Kaldor*
    Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ser/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/soceco/mwy043/5238113 by Ben Gurion University of the Negev-Medical Library user on 28 July 2019 Socio-Economic Review, 2018, Vol. 0, No. 0, 1–19 doi: 10.1093/soceco/mwy043 Article Article The cultural foundations of economic categories: finance and class in the marginalist revolution Yair Kaldor* Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Economic categories are part of the everyday concepts people use to apprehend social reality. While scholars recognize their importance for social and economic processes, it is not clear how these categories develop when reality itself changes. I address this issue with a framework that incorporates a cultural emphasis on meaning-making with a macro-structural analysis of the conditions in which they take place. I apply this framework to the marginalist revolution of the late 19th century, which marks the birth of neoclassical economics and focus on the new understanding of ‘value’ that emerged during this period. I trace it to the rise of finance and the problem of price fluctuations, and show how its class standpoint helps explain the different outcomes of the marginalist revolution in England, Austria and France. The analysis provides insights into the power of economic ideas and the cultural dimension of structural changes. Key words: economic categories, culture, finance, value, neoclassical economics, economic sociology JEL classification: B History of Economic Thought, N2 History of Financial Markets and Institutions, N1 Macroeconomic and Monetary History 1. Introduction The basic categories of economics appear as self-evident and are hardly in need of explana- tion.
    [Show full text]