American Constitutionalism Heard Round the World, 1776-1989

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American Constitutionalism Heard Round the World, 1776-1989 American Constitutionalism Heard Round the World, 1776–1989 This page intentionally left blank American Constitutionalism Heard Round the World, 1776–1989 A Global Perspective George Athan Billias NEW YORK UNIVERSITY PRESS New York and London NEW YORK UNIVERSITY PRESS New York and London www.nyupress.org © 2009 by George Athan Billias All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Billias, George Athan, 1919– American constitutionalism heard round the world, 1776–1989 : a global perspective / George Athan Billias. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978–0–8147–9107–3 (cl : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0–8147–9107–7 (cl : alk. paper) 1. Constitutional history—United States. 2. Constitutional history. 3. Constitutional law—United States. 4. Constitutional law. 5. World politics—To 1900. 6. World politics—1900–1945. 7. World politics—1945–1989. 8. Civilization, Modern— American influences. I. Title. KF4541.B56 2009 346.7302’9—dc22 2009005946 New York University Press books are printed on acid-free paper, and their binding materials are chosen for strength and durability. We strive to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the greatest extent possible in publishing our books. Manufactured in the United States of America 10987654321 Contents Acknowledgments vii Preface xi Part I Definitions 1 Of Constitutions and Constitutionalisms 3 2 American Constitutionalism Defined: 15 Six Seminal Documents Part II Seven Echoes of American Constitutionalism: A Global Perspective 3 First Echo: Europe, 1776–1800 53 4 Second Echo: Latin America, 1811–1900 105 5 European Interlude, 1800–1848 142 6 Third Echo: European Revolutions of 1848 176 7 European Interlude, 1850–1900 and 201 the American Civil War 8 Fourth Echo: American Empire 223 9 Fifth Echo: World War I to World War II, 1919–1945 250 10 Sixth Echo: American Crescendo, 1945–1974 276 11 Seventh Echo: American Constitutionalism and 320 Democratization, 1974–1989 12 Global Consciousness, Then and Now 357 v vi Contents Appendix: A Note on the Historiography of the Influence 373 of American Constitutionalism Abroad: 1776–1989 Notes 377 Index 491 About the Author 544 Acknowledgments My vision of the republic of letters is broader than most. It acquired an international dimension when not only American colleagues but also foreign scholars came to my assistance. Time as well as space was involved as I became more aware of how much I relied on the findings of past scholars. The borders of my republic expanded further when indi- viduals from other institutions of higher learning—universities, research centers, and foundations—contributed to the completion of this book. Finally, the boundaries of my republic were enlarged when I realized once again the tremendous importance of personal relationships—family, friends, and colleagues—as well as professional affiliations. They provide the emotional safety net without which no scholar can work. To these dedicated citizens in my republic of letters, I welcome this opportunity to express my heartfelt thanks. Three friends and fellow historians in Worcester—Peter Onuf, Ronald Petrin, and Robert Kolesar—helped get the project under way in a brown- bag seminar at Clark University. Peter continued to contribute hand- somely after leaving Worcester Polytechnic Institute for the University of Virginia. A bold scholar and ebullient friend, he read the entire manu- script, critiqued chapters, and changed the parameters of the project as originally conceived. Other gifted scholars contributed generously by reading the whole manuscript at various stages. Bernard Bailyn asked to see my first draft while working on his To Begin the World Anew. After performing the he- roic task of plowing through fifteen hundred pages of raw manuscript, he offered useful suggestions and encouragement. Stanley Katz, whose grasp of American constitutionalism abroad is formidable among scholars worldwide, made searching criticisms and graciously shared his knowl- edge. Francis Couvares, a former Clark colleague, offered many astute in- sights, applied his exceptional editing skills, and suggested a major reor- ganization critical to the completion of the project. Herbert Bass, a former vii viii Acknowledgments colleague at the University of Maine who had helped me many times be- fore, made stylistic revisions and additions that allowed the narrative to emerge with greater clarity. Paul Lucas, a current Clark colleague, taught me much about comparative history, as befits a student of Robert R. Palmer, and corrected some of my misconceptions. Martin Ridge, the late director of research at the Huntington Library and the one-time editor of the Journal of American History, went over an early draft with his blue pencil. Mark Tushnet was kind enough to comb the text from his perspec- tive of comparative legal history and to make an incisive critique. Robert Middlekauf was helpful by giving suggestions on where I might condense material. Alden Vaughan, a fellow Columbia PhD and longtime comrade, skillfully edited a late version with scrupulous care. Gerald Grob, my best friend and former Clark colleague with whom I have collaborated in the past, went over the final copy for glaring errors and responded with his usual dry and sly humor. Besides those who read the entire manuscript, I am indebted to other scholars who went over portions of the work. Some of the greatest histo- rians of early American history of this generation responded generously by reading parts of my manuscript dealing with their area of expertise. Among those who unselfishly took time from their own research were: Gordon Wood, Michael Kammen, Jack Greene, John Reid, Richard B. Bernstein, Richard D. Brown, Stanley Kutler, Herbert Johnson, Richard McCormick, and Stanley Elkins. I was fortunate to have America’s most distinguished world historian, William McNeill, give me the benefit of his great store of learning. The late Milton Klein, whose friendship stretched for fifty-six years, deserves special mention for reading and editing much of what I wrote. Another category of scholars contributed by commenting on countries or regions about which they had special knowledge: Alan Spitzer (France), Paul Cohen (modern Europe), Daniel Borg (Germany), John Dower (Ja- pan), Lawrence Beer (Japan), Keith Rosenn (Latin America), Thomas Skidmore (Latin America), Pnina Lahav (Israel), Shlomo Slonim (Israel), John Iatrides (Greece), and Paul Ropp (China). To Scott Gerber I am indebted for bringing my manuscript to the at- tention of New York University Press and for reading and editing several key chapters. I am obligated also to three members of the staff of the New York University Press, Deborah Gershenowitz, Gabrielle Begue, and Despina Papazoglou Gimbel for being so very helpful in textual editing and bringing the book to final form. Acknowledgments ix In completing the book, I am pleased to acknowledge the support of a number of institutions that enabled me to pursue research during the twenty-four years this work was in the making. In this regard, I am deeply indebted to the National Endowment for the Humanities for two fellowships and one from the Huntington Library. The Exxon Educational Foundation and Earhart Foundation also contributed grants. Clark University has my great gratitude for funds provided by the Ja- cob and Frances Hiatt Chair in History which I held from 1983 to 1989. Financial support also was available from the Chester and Shirley Bland Research Fund. Administrators, particularly the current president, John Bassett, and his predecessors created a hospitable environment that en- couraged research. Clark colleagues in the history department—Paul Lu- cas, Dan Borg, Doug Little, Drew McCoy, Paul Ropp, and Wim Klooster— whom I admire and whose friendship I treasure always were kind and responsive to my many queries. Graduate and undergraduate students in my research seminar on the U.S. Constitution provided skeptical listen- ers on whom I tried out ideas in the “elbow teaching” for which Clark is known. Other Clark colleagues helped by translating into English those foreign-language materials with which I was not familiar. The superb staff of the Goddard Library, including the magnanimous Mary Hartman, Irene Walch, Edward McDermott, Rachael Shea, Holly Howes, Anne Le- roy, Gladys Bowker, and Helen Cohane, remained patient and gracious despite my repeated requests. Librarian Gwendolynne Arthur and archi- vist Mott Linn provided other assistance. Two departmental secretaries, Trudy Powers and Diane Fenner, treated me over the years with greater kindness and consideration than I deserved. Although I have no formal affiliation with Harvard University, I am deeply indebted to that great institution for many courtesies, especially the encouragement offered by Oscar Handlin, one of its most outstanding scholars of American history. The holdings of Harvard’s Widener Library and the International Legal Studies Library were crucial to my research, and their staffs were both cordial and competent. I benefited also from the holdings and staff of two other great research libraries, the American Antiquarian Society and the Huntington Library. The Richter Library and the Law Library of the University of Miami extended similar professional courtesies. I believe firmly that family and friends profoundly affect a scholar’s life and work in mysterious ways that are not always obvious to the eye. Anyone who has undertaken a long-term project knows that without x Acknowledgments
Recommended publications
  • The Dutch Revolution of 1795 and the History of Republicanism Wyger RE
    Much in Little Revisited: The Dutch Revolution of 1795 and the History of Republicanism Wyger R.E. Velema, Department of History, University of Amsterdam Paper prepared for the conference ‘The Republican Tradition: From the Hanseatic League to the Era of the Enlightenment’, European University at St. Petersburg, December 7-9, 2012 Not to be quoted or cited without permission from the author It is more than half a century ago that R.R. Palmer, who was soon to become famous with his magisterial work The Age of the Democratic Revolution, introduced an international scholarly audience to the Dutch revolution of 1795, also known as the Batavian revolution. In his pioneering article ‘Much in Little: the Dutch Revolution of 1795’, he pointed out that the fall of the Dutch ancien régime and the revolutionary transformation of the Netherlands that followed this downfall could best be understood as part of an international and interlinked series of revolutionary events.1 On a small scale, the Batavian revolution therefore could serve to ‘illuminate the whole complex of war and revolution which then gripped the Western world’.2 As he made abundantly clear in the title of his later magnum opus, Palmer had a relatively simple and straightforward view of the struggles that tore the Western world of the late eighteenth century apart. Just as democracy had been at issue in the Dutch revolution of 1795, the whole European and American world of the final decades of the century of Enlightenment saw the rise of a new and historically unprecedented democratic opposition against all sorts of aristocratic ‘constituted bodies’.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioniers in Schaduwbeeld: Het Eerste Parlement Van Nederland 1796-1798
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Pioniers in schaduwbeeld: het eerste parlement van Nederland 1796-1798 Oddens, J. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Oddens, J. (2012). Pioniers in schaduwbeeld: het eerste parlement van Nederland 1796- 1798. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 HOOFDSTUK I Bewustwording Er werd in de stilte der nacht allerwegen in stede en dorpen een boekje gestrooit […] Ontzettend was de indruk, die deze verassing baarde […] Geheel Nederland ontwaarde met schrik en verontwaardiging dat in geheel Nederland geen wettig bestuur bestond. – Pieter Vreede1 alverwege de jaren dertig van de negentiende eeuw diepte Pieter Vreede, in zijn hoogtijdagen een van de markantste leden van het Bataafse parlement, een iconische H gebeurtenis op uit zijn geheugen.2 In de herinnering van Vreede was het volk van Nederland op de ochtend van 26 september 1781 ontwaakt uit meer dan nachtrust alleen.
    [Show full text]
  • N the Changing Shape of Pro-Slavery Arguments in the Netherlands (1789- 1814)
    3 n the changing shape of pro-slavery arguments in the Netherlands (1789- 1814) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-463320161402 Pepjin Brandon Department of History, VU Amsterdam International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam, Netherlands [email protected] Abstract: One of the puzzling questions about the formal Dutch abolition of the slave- trade in 1814 is why a state that was so committed to maintaining slavery in its Empire did not put up any open resistance to the enforced closing of the trade that fed it. The explanations that historians have given so far for this paradox focus mainly on circumstances within the Netherlands, highlighting the pre-1800 decline of the role of Dutch traders in the African slave-trade, the absence of a popular abolitionist movement, and the all-overriding focus within elite-debates on the question of economic decline. This article argues that the (often partial) advanced made by abolitionism internationally did have a pronounced influence on the course of Dutch debates. This can be seen not only from the pronouncements by a small minority that advocated abolition, but also in the arguments produced by the proponents of a continuation of slavery. Careful examination of the three key debates about the question that took place in 1789-1791, 1797 and around 1818 can show how among dominant circles within the Dutch state a new ideology gradually took hold that combined verbal concessions to abolitionist arguments and a grinding acknowledgement of the inevitability of slave-trade abolition with a long-term perspective for prolonging slave-based colonial production in the West-Indies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Example of the Dutch Republic for American Federalism
    The Example of the Dutch Republic for American Federalism J.W.SCHULTENORDHOLT We may derive from Holland lessons very beneficial to ourselves. John Marshall in the Convention of Virginia 1788. I History is philosophy teaching by examples. That famous saying expresses the eighteenth-century approach to the past better than long explanations. The philosophers and political scientists of the Enlightenment were eager to find examples to justify their actual deeds and opinions. Perhaps the deepest reason for this quest for an imitable past is to be found in their belief in the unity of Western civilization. There was a great chain of being, not only in space, as has been so magnificently described by Arthur Lovejoy, but also in time. The presupposition of such a belief in the cohesive patterns of the past was the conception that there had been, through the ages, a certain uniformity in human behaviour. Man had never changed, that is why history could be used as a model. As David Hume put it: Mankind are so much the same, in all times and places, that history informs us of no­ thing new or strange in this particular. Its chief use is only to discover the constant and universal principles of human nature. The task of the historian was not in the first place to understand the past for its own sake, but, as Carl Becker remarks, to choose between good and evil, 'be- tween the customs that were suited and those that were unsuited to man's nature'.1That is exactly what men like James Madison and his friends were to do during that long summer of 1787 when they drafted the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Americans in Two Dutch Republics the Adamses, Father and Son R
    Two Americans in Two Dutch Republics The Adamses, Father and Son R. R. PALMER N April 19, 1782, the States General formally received John O Adams as minister plenipotentiary from the United States. A reception by the Stadtholder, William V, soon followed, and a treaty between these two "powers of the earth," to use a phrase from the American Declaration of Independence, was signed the following October. It is not a treaty of military alliance, such as the United States signed with France in 1778. It is what diplomats call a treaty of amity and commerce. It is a long document, in twenty-nine articles. All the articles but one pertain to trade, merchant shipping, guarantees to seamen, and such matters. But the first article states that "there shall be a stable, inviolable and universal peace and sincere friendship between their High Mightinesses the States General of the United Provinces and the United States of America." Time has rendered many of the commercial provisions obsolete, and their High Mightinesses long ago disappeared, but the friendship remains; it has indeed been one of the least troubled of any between two peoples, and we hope and expect that it will continue to be so. Except for France, the Dutch government was the first in the world to recognize the United States. Last year, on a brief visit to Morocco, I learned that this honor is claimed for the Sultan of Morocco, but a little research has assured me that the priority of the Dutch treaty cannot be successfully challenged, for one article of the Dutch-American agreement provided for Dutch assistance to the Americans in negotiations with Morocco and the Barbary states, and the American treaty with Morocco was signed in 1787.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Masters of war: state, capital, and military enterprise in the Dutch cycle of accumulation (1600-1795) Brandon, P. Publication date 2013 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Brandon, P. (2013). Masters of war: state, capital, and military enterprise in the Dutch cycle of accumulation (1600-1795). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 Chapter 5 The structural crisis of the federal-brokerage state The preceding chapters have shown that war did not lead to a transformation from brokerage practices to nationalization, but instead strengthened the federal-brokerage aspects of the Dutch Republican state. However, this tendency was reversed in dramatic fashion at the end of the eighteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Practice Principle
    VU Research Portal Between practice and principle: Dutch ideas on censorship and press freedom, 1579- 1795 van Eijnatten, J. published in Redescriptions. Yearbook for Political Thought and Conceptual History 2004 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) van Eijnatten, J. (2004). Between practice and principle: Dutch ideas on censorship and press freedom, 1579- 1795. In Redescriptions. Yearbook for Political Thought and Conceptual History (pp. 85-113) General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 Joris van Eijnatten BETWEEN PRACTICE AND PRINCIPLE Dutch Ideas on Censorship and Press Freedom, 1579-17951 1.Introduction ost studies on the freedom of the press in the early modern MNetherlands – the territory encompassed by the Republic of the Seven United Provinces, which existed de facto between 1579 and 1795 – have focused on the legislation concerning, and the actual practice of, governmental and ecclesiastical censorship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Union of Utrecht. Its Genesis and Consequences
    The Union of Utrecht: its Genesis and Consequences J.C. BOOGMAN In the hall where we are now assembled, the former chapter-hall of the cathedral, which has been serving for a long time now as auditorium for the University of Utrecht, the Union of Utrecht was founded on 23rd January 1579. Our congress on federalism has been organized, as you know, within the context of the com- memoration of the establishment of the Union four hundred years ago. It therefore seemed to me desirable, at the outset, to devote some attention to the origin of the league that was formed in this particular hall 'for all eternity'. Next, in the second part of my lecture, the functioning of the federal system of the Republic of the United Netherlands will be discussed. It seems to me all the more justified to devote some attention to the formation of the Union as it constituted the foundation of the federal incorporation of the seven provinces into the Repu­ blic of the United Netherlands. The young Pieter Paulus, who in the years 1775- 77 published a commentary on the Union which has since become famous, described it as the Bulwark of our Liberty, the joyous Mother of so many blessings, the Cultivator of the prestige of this Republic at the principal courts of Europe , and as base of that Pyramid, to which eminent men have compared this State.1 I The event which took place in this hall on 23rd January 1579 provides, however, despite the forceful chiming of the cathedral bells, a considerably less impressive picture (a picture which was otherwise in perfect harmony with the most salient feature of the revolt: the civil war aspect).
    [Show full text]
  • The Citizenship Experiment Studies in the History of Political Thought
    The Citizenship Experiment Studies in the History of Political Thought Series Editor Annelien de Dijn (Utrecht University) Advisory Board Janet Coleman (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Vittor Ivo Comparato (University of Perugia, Italy) Jacques Guilhaumou (cnrs, France) John Marshall (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA) Markku Peltonen (University of Helsinki, Finland) volume 15 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship The Citizenship Experiment Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions By René Koekkoek leiden | boston This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Carel Frederik Bendorp (1736–1814), Allegorie op de Conventie (1795), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. For a detailed description: see page ix. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2019038014 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Citizenship Experiment
    The Citizenship Experiment René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> Studies in the History of Political Thought Series Editor Annelien de Dijn (Utrecht University) Advisory Board Janet Coleman (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Vittor Ivo Comparato (University of Perugia, Italy) Jacques Guilhaumou (cnrs, France) John Marshall (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA) Markku Peltonen (University of Helsinki, Finland) volume 15 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> The Citizenship Experiment Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions By René Koekkoek leiden | boston René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched.
    [Show full text]
  • Download: Brill.Com/Brill-Typeface
    The Citizenship Experiment <UN> Studies in the History of Political Thought Series Editor Annelien de Dijn (Utrecht University) Advisory Board Janet Coleman (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Vittor Ivo Comparato (University of Perugia, Italy) Jacques Guilhaumou (cnrs, France) John Marshall (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA) Markku Peltonen (University of Helsinki, Finland) volume 15 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship <UN> The Citizenship Experiment Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions By René Koekkoek leiden | boston <UN> This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Carel Frederik Bendorp (1736–1814), Allegorie op de Conventie (1795), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. For a detailed description: see page ix. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2019038014 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in the History of Political Thought
    The Citizenship Experiment <UN> Studies in the History of Political Thought Series Editor Annelien de Dijn (Utrecht University) Advisory Board Janet Coleman (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Vittor Ivo Comparato (University of Perugia, Italy) Jacques Guilhaumou (cnrs, France) John Marshall (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA) Markku Peltonen (University of Helsinki, Finland) volume 15 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship <UN> The Citizenship Experiment Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions By René Koekkoek leiden | boston <UN> This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Carel Frederik Bendorp (1736–1814), Allegorie op de Conventie (1795), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. For a detailed description: see page ix. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2019038014 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
    [Show full text]