The Citizenship Experiment Studies in the History of Political Thought

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Citizenship Experiment Studies in the History of Political Thought The Citizenship Experiment Studies in the History of Political Thought Series Editor Annelien de Dijn (Utrecht University) Advisory Board Janet Coleman (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Vittor Ivo Comparato (University of Perugia, Italy) Jacques Guilhaumou (cnrs, France) John Marshall (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA) Markku Peltonen (University of Helsinki, Finland) volume 15 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship The Citizenship Experiment Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions By René Koekkoek leiden | boston This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Carel Frederik Bendorp (1736–1814), Allegorie op de Conventie (1795), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. For a detailed description: see page ix. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2019038014 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 1873-6548 ISBN 978-90-04-22570-1 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-41645-1 (e-book) Copyright 2020 by René Koekkoek. Published by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi, Brill Sense, Hotei Publishing, mentis Verlag, Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh and Wilhelm Fink Verlag. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper and produced in a sustainable manner. Contents Acknowledgments VII Cover Illustration IX Introduction 1 1 Citizenship in the Age of Revolutions 2 2 The Terror and the Haitian Revolution 7 3 A Comparative Approach to the ‘Atlantic Thermidor’ 14 1 ‘The Kindred Spirit Tie of Congenial Principles’ 26 1 Rights Declarations and the Constitutional Framework of Citizenship 31 2 Converging Revolutionary Citizenship Ideals 34 3 The French Revolution and the Heyday of a Transatlantic Ideal of Citizenship 43 4 Regimes of Exclusion 52 2 Saint-Domingue, Rights and Empire 57 1 The Logic of Rights and the Realm of Empire 60 2 The Nation’s Colonial Citizens 63 3 Slavery and Civic Inequality in the US before Saint-Domingue 69 3 The Civilizational Limits of Citizenship 78 1 The Enlightenment Language of Civilization 82 2 Unity and Hierarchy in the French Empire 91 3 Levelling Principles and Remorseless Savages 97 4 The Turn Away from French Universalism 105 1 Citizenship and Inequality in the Dutch Republican Empire 107 2 ‘The vile machinations of men calling themselves philosophers’ 118 3 The French Colonial Thermidor 123 5 Uniting ‘good’ Citizens in Thermidorian France 132 1 The Revolutionary Political Culture of Citizenship, 1792–1794 136 2 Good Citizen / Bad Citizen 141 3 Isolating the Citizen 146 4 What is a Good Citizen? Redefining Civic Virtues 154 5 Narrowing Down Political Citizenship 158 vi Contents 6 The Post-Revolutionary Contestation and Nationalization of American Citizenship 169 1 A Burgeoning Partisan Public Sphere 171 2 ‘Whether France is Saved or Ruined, is still Problematical’ 174 3 Political Societies, Faction, and the Limits of Democratic Citizenship 179 4 Anti-Jacobinism and the American Citizenship Model 188 7 Forging the Batavian Citizen in a Post-Terror Revolution 201 1 Portraying the Terror between Orangist Restoration and Batavian Revolution 205 2 Limiting Power, Protecting Rights: The Terror and the Need for a Constitution 213 3 Channelling the Participation of the People 219 4 Nationalization 227 5 The End of the Democratic-Republican Citizen 231 Epilogue: The Age of Revolutions as a Turning Point in the History of Citizenship 240 Bibliography 253 Index 290 Acknowledgments This book project began at Utrecht University’s Research Institute for History and Culture and was generously financed by a grant from the Netherlands Or- ganization for Scientific Research (NWO). I am most grateful for their financial and institutional support. It is also a great pleasure to thank my supervisors Ido de Haan and Wijnand Mijnhardt. Ido has been my mentor since I started my research master in history in Utrecht in 2008. His rigour and demanding standards have sharpened this book’s arguments as well as my attitude of mind in general. At an early stage, Wijnand agreed to act as a second supervisor. I deeply appreciated his eye for the big picture and his infectious enthusiasm for scholarship in the true sense of the word. I also wish to thank Maarten Prak for his help in the earliest stages of my research project. During the final stages of my research I had the privilege to spend time at Princeton University where David Bell welcomed me as a graduate research fellow. I profited greatly from his incisive comments and was honoured that I was given the opportunity to present my project at the distinguished Princeton Eighteenth Century Semi- nar. I want to thank him also for staying in touch and sharing his advice with me long after I had left New Jersey. The seeds for this project were sown during my studies at the bachelor’s and master’s level. In particular James Kennedy, Josine Blok and Siep Stuurman have shaped my thinking. I owe a special thanks to Wyger Velema who –in his research seminar on the Batavian Revolution– ignited my interest in the late eighteenth-century Age of Revolutions. I presented research papers related to the book project at several venues: the International Congress for Eighteenth Century Studies in Rotterdam, the Third International Conference of the Association for Political History at Bielefeld University, the Conference The Roots of Nationalism, 1600–1815 at Nijmegen University, the Seminar of the Research School Political History at Utrecht, the International Conference on the History of Concepts in Bilbao, the Annual Weissbourd Conference of the Society of Fellows at University of Chicago, and the Consortium of the Revolutionary Era, in Charleston, S.C. I thank all the audiences for their questions and comments. In particular, I benefited from comments by, and conversations with Hans Erich Bödeker, Samuel Moyn, and Henk te Velde. A special thanks also to Katlyn Carter and James Alexander Dun for collaborating on a panel at the Consortium and for exchanging insights on the revolutionary era in both Princeton and Charles- ton. In addition, thanks to Nathan Perl-Rosenthal for sharing his thoughts with me through e-mail on the concept of citizenship in the revolutionary era. viii Acknowledgments At Utrecht University as well as the University of Amsterdam I have benefit- ed greatly from comments and suggestions by Pepijn Corduwener, Joris Odd- ens, Jan Rotmans, Devin Vartija, and Bart Verheijen. Over the last years I have also greatly appreciated the academic companionship and collaboration on various exciting projects with: Lars Behrisch, Camille Creyghton, Annelien de Dijn, Boyd van Dijk, Lisa Kattenberg, and Matthijs Lok, and again Devin and Pepijn. I want to thank the series editor Annelien de Dijn for enthusiastically wel- coming my book in the Brill Series in the History of Political Thought. Thanks to my editor Ivo Romein and production editor Kim Fiona Plas for the smooth and pleasant collaboration, and the three anonymous reviewers for their comments. I also want to thank a number of people without whom this book would not have been possible. First of all, my mother Ann Schilderinck and father Flip Koekkoek for their encouragement and support. Unfortunately, my father was only able to witness my first years as a history student. I want to thank Bert Leufkens who together with Ann has meant a lot for me and my family. Many thanks to my mother-in-law, Marjet Vos, who has been a mainstay for our fam- ily; and thanks also to my father-in-law Gerard Bakker in whose home at the lake of Vinkeveen I wrote many pages that ended up in this book. It was very important to me, Fedja and my children to have my sister Sanneke Koekkoek and brother-in-law Joost Lemmens and their children living close to us during the years of research and writing. Finally, I want to thank Fedja for everything. She has witnessed – and prob- ably suffered most from – every stage of the project. In the meanwhile, we’ve been incredibly lucky and thankful to have welcomed our three wonderful
Recommended publications
  • The Dutch Revolution of 1795 and the History of Republicanism Wyger RE
    Much in Little Revisited: The Dutch Revolution of 1795 and the History of Republicanism Wyger R.E. Velema, Department of History, University of Amsterdam Paper prepared for the conference ‘The Republican Tradition: From the Hanseatic League to the Era of the Enlightenment’, European University at St. Petersburg, December 7-9, 2012 Not to be quoted or cited without permission from the author It is more than half a century ago that R.R. Palmer, who was soon to become famous with his magisterial work The Age of the Democratic Revolution, introduced an international scholarly audience to the Dutch revolution of 1795, also known as the Batavian revolution. In his pioneering article ‘Much in Little: the Dutch Revolution of 1795’, he pointed out that the fall of the Dutch ancien régime and the revolutionary transformation of the Netherlands that followed this downfall could best be understood as part of an international and interlinked series of revolutionary events.1 On a small scale, the Batavian revolution therefore could serve to ‘illuminate the whole complex of war and revolution which then gripped the Western world’.2 As he made abundantly clear in the title of his later magnum opus, Palmer had a relatively simple and straightforward view of the struggles that tore the Western world of the late eighteenth century apart. Just as democracy had been at issue in the Dutch revolution of 1795, the whole European and American world of the final decades of the century of Enlightenment saw the rise of a new and historically unprecedented democratic opposition against all sorts of aristocratic ‘constituted bodies’.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioniers in Schaduwbeeld: Het Eerste Parlement Van Nederland 1796-1798
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Pioniers in schaduwbeeld: het eerste parlement van Nederland 1796-1798 Oddens, J. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Oddens, J. (2012). Pioniers in schaduwbeeld: het eerste parlement van Nederland 1796- 1798. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 HOOFDSTUK I Bewustwording Er werd in de stilte der nacht allerwegen in stede en dorpen een boekje gestrooit […] Ontzettend was de indruk, die deze verassing baarde […] Geheel Nederland ontwaarde met schrik en verontwaardiging dat in geheel Nederland geen wettig bestuur bestond. – Pieter Vreede1 alverwege de jaren dertig van de negentiende eeuw diepte Pieter Vreede, in zijn hoogtijdagen een van de markantste leden van het Bataafse parlement, een iconische H gebeurtenis op uit zijn geheugen.2 In de herinnering van Vreede was het volk van Nederland op de ochtend van 26 september 1781 ontwaakt uit meer dan nachtrust alleen.
    [Show full text]
  • N the Changing Shape of Pro-Slavery Arguments in the Netherlands (1789- 1814)
    3 n the changing shape of pro-slavery arguments in the Netherlands (1789- 1814) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-463320161402 Pepjin Brandon Department of History, VU Amsterdam International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam, Netherlands [email protected] Abstract: One of the puzzling questions about the formal Dutch abolition of the slave- trade in 1814 is why a state that was so committed to maintaining slavery in its Empire did not put up any open resistance to the enforced closing of the trade that fed it. The explanations that historians have given so far for this paradox focus mainly on circumstances within the Netherlands, highlighting the pre-1800 decline of the role of Dutch traders in the African slave-trade, the absence of a popular abolitionist movement, and the all-overriding focus within elite-debates on the question of economic decline. This article argues that the (often partial) advanced made by abolitionism internationally did have a pronounced influence on the course of Dutch debates. This can be seen not only from the pronouncements by a small minority that advocated abolition, but also in the arguments produced by the proponents of a continuation of slavery. Careful examination of the three key debates about the question that took place in 1789-1791, 1797 and around 1818 can show how among dominant circles within the Dutch state a new ideology gradually took hold that combined verbal concessions to abolitionist arguments and a grinding acknowledgement of the inevitability of slave-trade abolition with a long-term perspective for prolonging slave-based colonial production in the West-Indies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Example of the Dutch Republic for American Federalism
    The Example of the Dutch Republic for American Federalism J.W.SCHULTENORDHOLT We may derive from Holland lessons very beneficial to ourselves. John Marshall in the Convention of Virginia 1788. I History is philosophy teaching by examples. That famous saying expresses the eighteenth-century approach to the past better than long explanations. The philosophers and political scientists of the Enlightenment were eager to find examples to justify their actual deeds and opinions. Perhaps the deepest reason for this quest for an imitable past is to be found in their belief in the unity of Western civilization. There was a great chain of being, not only in space, as has been so magnificently described by Arthur Lovejoy, but also in time. The presupposition of such a belief in the cohesive patterns of the past was the conception that there had been, through the ages, a certain uniformity in human behaviour. Man had never changed, that is why history could be used as a model. As David Hume put it: Mankind are so much the same, in all times and places, that history informs us of no­ thing new or strange in this particular. Its chief use is only to discover the constant and universal principles of human nature. The task of the historian was not in the first place to understand the past for its own sake, but, as Carl Becker remarks, to choose between good and evil, 'be- tween the customs that were suited and those that were unsuited to man's nature'.1That is exactly what men like James Madison and his friends were to do during that long summer of 1787 when they drafted the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Americans in Two Dutch Republics the Adamses, Father and Son R
    Two Americans in Two Dutch Republics The Adamses, Father and Son R. R. PALMER N April 19, 1782, the States General formally received John O Adams as minister plenipotentiary from the United States. A reception by the Stadtholder, William V, soon followed, and a treaty between these two "powers of the earth," to use a phrase from the American Declaration of Independence, was signed the following October. It is not a treaty of military alliance, such as the United States signed with France in 1778. It is what diplomats call a treaty of amity and commerce. It is a long document, in twenty-nine articles. All the articles but one pertain to trade, merchant shipping, guarantees to seamen, and such matters. But the first article states that "there shall be a stable, inviolable and universal peace and sincere friendship between their High Mightinesses the States General of the United Provinces and the United States of America." Time has rendered many of the commercial provisions obsolete, and their High Mightinesses long ago disappeared, but the friendship remains; it has indeed been one of the least troubled of any between two peoples, and we hope and expect that it will continue to be so. Except for France, the Dutch government was the first in the world to recognize the United States. Last year, on a brief visit to Morocco, I learned that this honor is claimed for the Sultan of Morocco, but a little research has assured me that the priority of the Dutch treaty cannot be successfully challenged, for one article of the Dutch-American agreement provided for Dutch assistance to the Americans in negotiations with Morocco and the Barbary states, and the American treaty with Morocco was signed in 1787.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Masters of war: state, capital, and military enterprise in the Dutch cycle of accumulation (1600-1795) Brandon, P. Publication date 2013 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Brandon, P. (2013). Masters of war: state, capital, and military enterprise in the Dutch cycle of accumulation (1600-1795). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 Chapter 5 The structural crisis of the federal-brokerage state The preceding chapters have shown that war did not lead to a transformation from brokerage practices to nationalization, but instead strengthened the federal-brokerage aspects of the Dutch Republican state. However, this tendency was reversed in dramatic fashion at the end of the eighteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Practice Principle
    VU Research Portal Between practice and principle: Dutch ideas on censorship and press freedom, 1579- 1795 van Eijnatten, J. published in Redescriptions. Yearbook for Political Thought and Conceptual History 2004 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) van Eijnatten, J. (2004). Between practice and principle: Dutch ideas on censorship and press freedom, 1579- 1795. In Redescriptions. Yearbook for Political Thought and Conceptual History (pp. 85-113) General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 Joris van Eijnatten BETWEEN PRACTICE AND PRINCIPLE Dutch Ideas on Censorship and Press Freedom, 1579-17951 1.Introduction ost studies on the freedom of the press in the early modern MNetherlands – the territory encompassed by the Republic of the Seven United Provinces, which existed de facto between 1579 and 1795 – have focused on the legislation concerning, and the actual practice of, governmental and ecclesiastical censorship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Union of Utrecht. Its Genesis and Consequences
    The Union of Utrecht: its Genesis and Consequences J.C. BOOGMAN In the hall where we are now assembled, the former chapter-hall of the cathedral, which has been serving for a long time now as auditorium for the University of Utrecht, the Union of Utrecht was founded on 23rd January 1579. Our congress on federalism has been organized, as you know, within the context of the com- memoration of the establishment of the Union four hundred years ago. It therefore seemed to me desirable, at the outset, to devote some attention to the origin of the league that was formed in this particular hall 'for all eternity'. Next, in the second part of my lecture, the functioning of the federal system of the Republic of the United Netherlands will be discussed. It seems to me all the more justified to devote some attention to the formation of the Union as it constituted the foundation of the federal incorporation of the seven provinces into the Repu­ blic of the United Netherlands. The young Pieter Paulus, who in the years 1775- 77 published a commentary on the Union which has since become famous, described it as the Bulwark of our Liberty, the joyous Mother of so many blessings, the Cultivator of the prestige of this Republic at the principal courts of Europe , and as base of that Pyramid, to which eminent men have compared this State.1 I The event which took place in this hall on 23rd January 1579 provides, however, despite the forceful chiming of the cathedral bells, a considerably less impressive picture (a picture which was otherwise in perfect harmony with the most salient feature of the revolt: the civil war aspect).
    [Show full text]
  • The Citizenship Experiment
    The Citizenship Experiment René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> Studies in the History of Political Thought Series Editor Annelien de Dijn (Utrecht University) Advisory Board Janet Coleman (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Vittor Ivo Comparato (University of Perugia, Italy) Jacques Guilhaumou (cnrs, France) John Marshall (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA) Markku Peltonen (University of Helsinki, Finland) volume 15 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> The Citizenship Experiment Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions By René Koekkoek leiden | boston René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched.
    [Show full text]
  • Download: Brill.Com/Brill-Typeface
    The Citizenship Experiment <UN> Studies in the History of Political Thought Series Editor Annelien de Dijn (Utrecht University) Advisory Board Janet Coleman (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Vittor Ivo Comparato (University of Perugia, Italy) Jacques Guilhaumou (cnrs, France) John Marshall (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA) Markku Peltonen (University of Helsinki, Finland) volume 15 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship <UN> The Citizenship Experiment Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions By René Koekkoek leiden | boston <UN> This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Carel Frederik Bendorp (1736–1814), Allegorie op de Conventie (1795), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. For a detailed description: see page ix. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2019038014 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in the History of Political Thought
    The Citizenship Experiment <UN> Studies in the History of Political Thought Series Editor Annelien de Dijn (Utrecht University) Advisory Board Janet Coleman (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Vittor Ivo Comparato (University of Perugia, Italy) Jacques Guilhaumou (cnrs, France) John Marshall (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA) Markku Peltonen (University of Helsinki, Finland) volume 15 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship <UN> The Citizenship Experiment Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions By René Koekkoek leiden | boston <UN> This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Carel Frederik Bendorp (1736–1814), Allegorie op de Conventie (1795), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. For a detailed description: see page ix. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2019038014 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
    [Show full text]
  • De Ontdekking Van Het Zeeuwse Platteland Culturele Verhoudingen Tussen Stad En Platteland in Zeeland 1750-1850
    De ontdekking van het Zeeuwse platteland culturele verhoudingen tussen stad en platteland in Zeeland 1750-1850 Arno Neele 2 De ontdekking van het Zeeuwse platteland: culturele verhoudingen tussen stad en platteland in Zeeland 1750-1850 Discovery of the Zeeland countryside: urban-rural cultural ties in Zeeland 1750-1850 (with a summary in English) PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 31 maart 2011 des middags te 4.15 uur door ARNO NEELE geboren op 14 november 1977 te Stavenisse 3 Promotor: Prof. dr. W.W. Mijnhardt Co-promotor: Dr. P. Brusse 4 Ten geleide Dit onderzoek maakt deel uit van een groter project getiteld: De balans tussen stad en platteland; desurbanisatie en de opkomst van de agrarische samenleving: Zeeland 1700- 1860 . Het uitgangspunt van dit onderzoeksproject was de volgende hypothese: de desurbanisatie in de achtiende en negentiende eeuw was niet zozeer een symptoom van neergang, maar eerder een kwestie van een verschuiving van economische, politieke en culturele macht van stad naar platteland. Daartoe zijn drie deel projecten geformuleerd, waarbij Zeeland als casus is genomen, omdat deze provincie in de zeventiende en achttiende eeuw sterk verstedelijkt was en de ontstedelijking daar hard toesloeg. Bovendien is Zeeland een overzichtelijk onderzoeksgebied. Het eerste deelproject betreft de bestudering van de ‘economische en sociale krachten’. Paul Brusse heeft dat onderzoek verricht. 1 Het tweede project, dat door Jeanine Dekker is uitgevoerd, betreft de ‘politieke verhoudingen’.
    [Show full text]