The Citizenship Experiment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Citizenship Experiment The Citizenship Experiment René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> Studies in the History of Political Thought Series Editor Annelien de Dijn (Utrecht University) Advisory Board Janet Coleman (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Vittor Ivo Comparato (University of Perugia, Italy) Jacques Guilhaumou (cnrs, France) John Marshall (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA) Markku Peltonen (University of Helsinki, Finland) volume 15 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> The Citizenship Experiment Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions By René Koekkoek leiden | boston René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Carel Frederik Bendorp (1736–1814), Allegorie op de Conventie (1795), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. For a detailed description: see page ix. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2019038014 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 1873-6548 ISBN 978-90-04-22570-1 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-41645-1 (e-book) Copyright 2020 by René Koekkoek. Published by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi, Brill Sense, Hotei Publishing, mentis Verlag, Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh and Wilhelm Fink Verlag. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper and produced in a sustainable manner. René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht Contents Acknowledgments VII Cover Illustration IX Introduction 1 1 Citizenship in the Age of Revolutions 2 2 The Terror and the Haitian Revolution 7 3 A Comparative Approach to the ‘Atlantic Thermidor’ 14 1 ‘The Kindred Spirit Tie of Congenial Principles’ 26 1 Rights Declarations and the Constitutional Framework of Citizenship 31 2 Converging Revolutionary Citizenship Ideals 34 3 The French Revolution and the Heyday of a Transatlantic Ideal of Citizenship 43 4 Regimes of Exclusion 52 2 Saint-Domingue, Rights and Empire 57 1 The Logic of Rights and the Realm of Empire 60 2 The Nation’s Colonial Citizens 63 3 Slavery and Civic Inequality in the US before Saint-Domingue 69 3 The Civilizational Limits of Citizenship 78 1 The Enlightenment Language of Civilization 82 2 Unity and Hierarchy in the French Empire 91 3 Levelling Principles and Remorseless Savages 97 4 The Turn Away from French Universalism 105 1 Citizenship and Inequality in the Dutch Republican Empire 107 2 ‘The vile machinations of men calling themselves philosophers’ 118 3 The French Colonial Thermidor 123 5 Uniting ‘good’ Citizens in Thermidorian France 132 1 The Revolutionary Political Culture of Citizenship, 1792–1794 136 2 Good Citizen / Bad Citizen 141 3 Isolating the Citizen 146 4 What is a Good Citizen? Redefining Civic Virtues 154 5 Narrowing Down Political Citizenship 158 René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> vi Contents 6 The Post-Revolutionary Contestation and Nationalization of American Citizenship 169 1 A Burgeoning Partisan Public Sphere 171 2 ‘Whether France is Saved or Ruined, is still Problematical’ 174 3 Political Societies, Faction, and the Limits of Democratic Citizenship 179 4 Anti-Jacobinism and the American Citizenship Model 188 7 Forging the Batavian Citizen in a Post-Terror Revolution 201 1 Portraying the Terror between Orangist Restoration and Batavian Revolution 205 2 Limiting Power, Protecting Rights: The Terror and the Need for a Constitution 213 3 Channelling the Participation of the People 219 4 Nationalization 227 5 The End of the Democratic-Republican Citizen 231 Epilogue: The Age of Revolutions as a Turning Point in the History of Citizenship 240 Bibliography 253 Index 290 René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> Acknowledgments This book project began at Utrecht University’s Research Institute for History and Culture and was generously financed by a grant from the Netherlands Or- ganization for Scientific Research (NWO). I am most grateful for their financial and institutional support. It is also a great pleasure to thank my supervisors Ido de Haan and Wijnand Mijnhardt. Ido has been my mentor since I started my research master in history in Utrecht in 2008. His rigour and demanding standards have sharpened this book’s arguments as well as my attitude of mind in general. At an early stage, Wijnand agreed to act as a second supervisor. I deeply appreciated his eye for the big picture and his infectious enthusiasm for scholarship in the true sense of the word. I also wish to thank Maarten Prak for his help in the earliest stages of my research project. During the final stages of my research I had the privilege to spend time at Princeton University where David Bell welcomed me as a graduate research fellow. I profited greatly from his incisive comments and was honoured that I was given the opportunity to present my project at the distinguished Princeton Eighteenth Century Semi- nar. I want to thank him also for staying in touch and sharing his advice with me long after I had left New Jersey. The seeds for this project were sown during my studies at the bachelor’s and master’s level. In particular James Kennedy, Josine Blok and Siep Stuurman have shaped my thinking. I owe a special thanks to Wyger Velema who –in his research seminar on the Batavian Revolution– ignited my interest in the late eighteenth-century Age of Revolutions. I presented research papers related to the book project at several venues: the International Congress for Eighteenth Century Studies in Rotterdam, the Third International Conference of the Association for Political History at Bielefeld University, the Conference The Roots of Nationalism, 1600–1815 at Nijmegen University, the Seminar of the Research School Political History at Utrecht, the International Conference on the History of Concepts in Bilbao, the Annual Weissbourd Conference of the Society of Fellows at University of Chicago, and the Consortium of the Revolutionary Era, in Charleston, S.C. I thank all the audiences for their questions and comments. In particular, I benefited from comments by, and conversations with Hans Erich Bödeker, Samuel Moyn, and Henk te Velde. A special thanks also to Katlyn Carter and James Alexander Dun for collaborating on a panel at the Consortium and for exchanging insights on the revolutionary era in both Princeton and Charles- ton. In addition, thanks to Nathan Perl-Rosenthal for sharing his thoughts with me through e-mail on the concept of citizenship in the revolutionary era. René Koekkoek - 978-90-04-41645-1 Downloaded from Brill.com02/17/2020 10:25:54AM via Universiteit Utrecht <UN> viii Acknowledgments At Utrecht University as well as the University of Amsterdam I have benefit- ed greatly from comments and suggestions by Pepijn Corduwener, Joris Odd- ens, Jan Rotmans, Devin Vartija, and Bart Verheijen. Over the last years I have also greatly appreciated the academic companionship and collaboration on various exciting projects with: Lars Behrisch, Camille Creyghton, Annelien de Dijn, Boyd van Dijk, Lisa Kattenberg, and Matthijs Lok, and again Devin and Pepijn. I want to thank the series editor Annelien de Dijn for enthusiastically wel- coming my book in the Brill Series in the History of Political Thought. Thanks to my editor Ivo Romein and production editor Kim Fiona Plas for the smooth and pleasant collaboration, and the three anonymous reviewers for their comments. I also want to thank a number of people without whom this book would not have been possible. First of all, my mother Ann Schilderinck and father Flip Koekkoek for their encouragement and support. Unfortunately, my father was only able to witness my first years as a history student. I want to thank Bert Leufkens who together with Ann has meant a lot for me and my family. Many thanks to my mother-in-law, Marjet Vos, who has been a mainstay for our fam- ily; and thanks also to my father-in-law Gerard Bakker in whose home at the lake of Vinkeveen I wrote many pages that ended up in this book.
Recommended publications
  • Lodewijk Napoleon En Het Einde Van De Republikeinse Politiek Wyger R.E
    P147-158 Wyger R.E. Velema:P147-158 Wyger R.E. Velema 13-12-2006 15:06 Pagina 147 Lodewijk Napoleon en het einde van de republikeinse politiek Wyger R.E. Velema ‘Een koningrijk! Ja mijn vriend, zoover is het eindelijk met ons land gekomen’, schreef Anton Reinhard Falck op 13 juni 1806, in een brief vol walging en ver- ontwaardiging, aan Johan Hora Siccama in Groningen.1 Hij was bepaald niet de enige tijdgenoot die met afgrijzen en verbazing reageerde op het definitieve einde van de republikeinse regeringsvorm, een regeringsvorm die twee eeuwen lang, weliswaar met telkens andere argumenten maar altijd in de overtuiging van haar superioriteit aan iedere vorm van monarchie, in eensgezindheid door de Nederlanders was geroemd. Gedurende de gehele achttiende eeuw, om niet verder in de tijd terug te gaan, waren eerst Staatsgezinden en Orangisten en la- ter ook revolutionairen en conservatieven het, bij al hun vaak fundamentele onderlinge politieke meningsverschillen, over één ding eens geweest: het land was een republiek en diende dat te blijven. Gezien deze opmerkelijke continuï- teit in republikeinse politieke gezindheid, zou men mogen verwachten dat de abrupte overgang naar een monarchale regeringsvorm in 1806 door historici grondig is onderzocht en uitputtend is geanalyseerd. Niets is echter minder waar. Net als de politieke en politiek theoretische geschiedenis van het hele de- cennium waarin deze transitie plaatsvond, is de vestiging van de monarchie on- der Lodewijk Napoleon een onderbelicht onderdeel in de geschiedschrijving over het ontstaan van het moderne Nederland gebleven. De verklaring voor deze hardnekkige lacune moet ten dele worden gezocht in de manier waarop historici tegenwoordig de decennia rond 1800 indelen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dutch Revolution of 1795 and the History of Republicanism Wyger RE
    Much in Little Revisited: The Dutch Revolution of 1795 and the History of Republicanism Wyger R.E. Velema, Department of History, University of Amsterdam Paper prepared for the conference ‘The Republican Tradition: From the Hanseatic League to the Era of the Enlightenment’, European University at St. Petersburg, December 7-9, 2012 Not to be quoted or cited without permission from the author It is more than half a century ago that R.R. Palmer, who was soon to become famous with his magisterial work The Age of the Democratic Revolution, introduced an international scholarly audience to the Dutch revolution of 1795, also known as the Batavian revolution. In his pioneering article ‘Much in Little: the Dutch Revolution of 1795’, he pointed out that the fall of the Dutch ancien régime and the revolutionary transformation of the Netherlands that followed this downfall could best be understood as part of an international and interlinked series of revolutionary events.1 On a small scale, the Batavian revolution therefore could serve to ‘illuminate the whole complex of war and revolution which then gripped the Western world’.2 As he made abundantly clear in the title of his later magnum opus, Palmer had a relatively simple and straightforward view of the struggles that tore the Western world of the late eighteenth century apart. Just as democracy had been at issue in the Dutch revolution of 1795, the whole European and American world of the final decades of the century of Enlightenment saw the rise of a new and historically unprecedented democratic opposition against all sorts of aristocratic ‘constituted bodies’.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioniers in Schaduwbeeld: Het Eerste Parlement Van Nederland 1796-1798
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Pioniers in schaduwbeeld: het eerste parlement van Nederland 1796-1798 Oddens, J. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Oddens, J. (2012). Pioniers in schaduwbeeld: het eerste parlement van Nederland 1796- 1798. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 HOOFDSTUK I Bewustwording Er werd in de stilte der nacht allerwegen in stede en dorpen een boekje gestrooit […] Ontzettend was de indruk, die deze verassing baarde […] Geheel Nederland ontwaarde met schrik en verontwaardiging dat in geheel Nederland geen wettig bestuur bestond. – Pieter Vreede1 alverwege de jaren dertig van de negentiende eeuw diepte Pieter Vreede, in zijn hoogtijdagen een van de markantste leden van het Bataafse parlement, een iconische H gebeurtenis op uit zijn geheugen.2 In de herinnering van Vreede was het volk van Nederland op de ochtend van 26 september 1781 ontwaakt uit meer dan nachtrust alleen.
    [Show full text]
  • History Bee of Versailles – Final Round Packet
    History Bee of Versailles – Final Round Packet 1) This Holocaust survivor and first female minister in French government pushed through her namesake law while serving as Minister of Health in the government of Valery Giscard d’Estaing, where she also championed a law that facilitated access to contraceptives. For the point, name this woman who names the law legalizing abortion in France. ANSWER: Simone Veil (do not accept Simone Weil) 2) After this government arrested General Jean-Charles Pichegru, this government became divided in the aftermath of the Coup of 18 Fructidor. This government’s legislature was consisted of the Counsel of Ancients and Council of Five Hundred, which were stormed by grenadiers in the Coup of 18 Brumaire. The Consulate replaced, for the point, what government which formed after the fall of Robespierre in 1794? ANSWER: French Directory 3) The relics of Saint Thomas Aquinas were donated by Pope Urban V to this city’s Church of the Jacobins. This city was the capital of a kingdom that was conquered by Euric after the Visigoths expanded to Arles and Marseilles, although it was captured and sacked by the Franks under Clovis after the Battle of Vouillé. After Septimania merged with this city’s namesake county, this city became the capital of Languedoc. For the point, name this southern French city, the historic capital of Occitania. ANSWER: Toulouse (or Tolosa) 4) In addition to the Federalist Revolts, the bloodiest of these events was put down by General Turreau’s “flying columns” and failed to take Nantes. During that example of these events, priests who refused to agree to the Civil Constitution of the Clergy were tied to barges and drowned in the Loire.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Shares for All
    FAIR SHARES FOR ALL JACOBIN EGALITARIANISM IN PRACT ICE JEAN-PIERRE GROSS This study explores the egalitarian policies pursued in the provinces during the radical phase of the French Revolution, but moves away from the habit of looking at such issues in terms of the Terror alone. It challenges revisionist readings of Jacobinism that dwell on its totalitarian potential or portray it as dangerously Utopian. The mainstream Jacobin agenda held out the promise of 'fair shares' and equal opportunities for all in a private-ownership market economy. It sought to achieve social justice without jeopardising human rights and tended thus to complement, rather than undermine, the liberal, individualist programme of the Revolution. The book stresses the relevance of the 'Enlightenment legacy', the close affinities between Girondins and Montagnards, the key role played by many lesser-known figures and the moral ascendancy of Robespierre. It reassesses the basic social and economic issues at stake in the Revolution, which cannot be adequately understood solely in terms of political discourse. Past and Present Publications Fair shares for all Past and Present Publications General Editor: JOANNA INNES, Somerville College, Oxford Past and Present Publications comprise books similar in character to the articles in the journal Past and Present. Whether the volumes in the series are collections of essays - some previously published, others new studies - or mono- graphs, they encompass a wide variety of scholarly and original works primarily concerned with social, economic and cultural changes, and their causes and consequences. They will appeal to both specialists and non-specialists and will endeavour to communicate the results of historical and allied research in readable and lively form.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Images As Allegory During the French Revolution
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2007 Visioning The Nation: Classical Images As Allegory During The French Revolution Kristopher Guy Reed University of Central Florida Part of the History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Reed, Kristopher Guy, "Visioning The Nation: Classical Images As Allegory During The French Revolution" (2007). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 3312. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3312 VISIONING THE NATION: CLASSICAL IMAGES AS ALLEGORY DURING THE FRENCH REVOLUTION by KRISTOPHER G. REED BA Stetson University, 1998 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2007 Major Professor: Amelia Lyons ABSTRACT In the latter half of the Eighteenth Century, France experienced a seismic shift in the nature of political culture. The king gave way to the nation at the center of political life as the location of sovereignty transferred to the people. While the French Revolution changed the structure of France’s government, it also changed the allegorical representations of the nation. At the Revolution’s onset, the monarchy embodied both the state and nation as equated ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fifth Republic - France’S Long Constitutional Walk
    Al-Bayan Center for Planning and Studies The Fifth Republic - France’s long constitutional walk By Catherine Shakdam By Catherine Shakdam Copyright © 2018 www.bayancenter.org [email protected] 2 About About Al-Bayan Center for Planning and Studies is an independent, nonprofit think tank based in Baghdad, Iraq. Its primary mission is to offer an authentic perspective on public and foreign policy issues related to Iraq and the region. Al-Bayan Center pursues its vision by conducting independent analysis, as well as proposing workable solutions for complex issues that concern policymakers and academics. 3 The Fifth Republic - France’s long constitutional walk By Catherine Shakdam * If France today can proudly claim to a rich democratic heritage, its walk towards such institutional freedom was not an easy one. Like most of its western counterparts, France’s history - and for the purpose of this research paper, France’s constitutional history started under monarchical absolutism. What is most pertinent to France’s democratic evolution is I believe France’s willingness to adhere to continuity in its political thought as opposed to selective amnesia. If France has suffered through many dark political and institutional spells - trading one republic for a monarchy or parliamentary independence for the military rule of an empire, France built upon its experiences to find its unique voice, and assert its tone. Born as much in its mistakes than it was born into its successes, France has maintained throughout its growing pains several constants - or maybe singularities, depending how one chooses to look at it. The Fifth Republic was adopted on 4 October 1958, the product of France’s constitutional thought and its socio-political history.
    [Show full text]
  • Willem De Clercq's Limitations and Ambitions: His Tenure As
    1 Willem de Clercq’s limitations and ambitions: his tenure as secretary of the Nederlandsche Handel-Maatschappij, circa 1824* I Introduction: Willem de Clercq on his way to a new post Willem de Clercq was born in 1795 in Amsterdam where, following his father’s death in 1817, he led the family’s grain trading firm S & P de Clercq. In the city’s business circles he was a well-known merchant and appreciated for his knowledge. An example of this is his fourteen-page Memorandum on the improvement of the state of trade in Amsterdam (1823) written at the request of the Governor of the northern part of the province of Holland.1 In the newspaper Opregte Haarlemsche Courant of 1 April 1824 De Clercq read about King Willem I’s decision to found a company to further trade, industry and agriculture in the United Kingdom of the Netherlands (modern-day Belgium and the Netherlands), of which he had become king in March 1815. The initiative was called the Nederlandsche Handel-Maatschappij (Netherlands Trading Society; hereafter NHM). De Clercq remarked in his diary: “Like a lightning flash it went through my soul, could this also mean something for me”. At that time the grain trading business was far from prospering and the continued existence of his family’s firm was uncertain.2 De Clercq began his campaign with great energy. On 7 April, on the recommendation of Minister of State W.F. Roëll, he had an audience with the King, who knew of his Memorandum. De Clercq had become acquainted with Roëll in Amsterdam some years before; they often discussed trade.
    [Show full text]
  • N the Changing Shape of Pro-Slavery Arguments in the Netherlands (1789- 1814)
    3 n the changing shape of pro-slavery arguments in the Netherlands (1789- 1814) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-463320161402 Pepjin Brandon Department of History, VU Amsterdam International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam, Netherlands [email protected] Abstract: One of the puzzling questions about the formal Dutch abolition of the slave- trade in 1814 is why a state that was so committed to maintaining slavery in its Empire did not put up any open resistance to the enforced closing of the trade that fed it. The explanations that historians have given so far for this paradox focus mainly on circumstances within the Netherlands, highlighting the pre-1800 decline of the role of Dutch traders in the African slave-trade, the absence of a popular abolitionist movement, and the all-overriding focus within elite-debates on the question of economic decline. This article argues that the (often partial) advanced made by abolitionism internationally did have a pronounced influence on the course of Dutch debates. This can be seen not only from the pronouncements by a small minority that advocated abolition, but also in the arguments produced by the proponents of a continuation of slavery. Careful examination of the three key debates about the question that took place in 1789-1791, 1797 and around 1818 can show how among dominant circles within the Dutch state a new ideology gradually took hold that combined verbal concessions to abolitionist arguments and a grinding acknowledgement of the inevitability of slave-trade abolition with a long-term perspective for prolonging slave-based colonial production in the West-Indies.
    [Show full text]
  • I Betje Wolff - Jeugd En Huwelijksjaren
    Wolff en Deken P.J. Buijnsters bron P.J. Buijnsters, Wolff en Deken. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden 1984 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/buij001wolf01_01/colofon.php © 2011 dbnl 2 aan Lin P.J. Buijnsters, Wolff en Deken 5 Sir, the biographical part of literature is what I loved most. (Boswell, Life of Johnson) P.J. Buijnsters, Wolff en Deken 9 Voorbericht Wie zich ertoe zet om een biografie van Betje Wolff en Aagje Deken te gaan schrijven, wordt aanstonds besprongen door vele twijfels. En zelfs als men daar geen last van heeft, komen anderen wel met die netelige vraag: waarom opnieuw een verhaal dat al vaker verteld is, het laatst in 1955 door Hendrika C.M. Ghijsen in haar Dapper vrouwenleven? Het antwoord, mijn antwoord, ligt eigenlijk reeds besloten in de opzet van dit vorige boek. Mevr. Ghijsen was als weinigen vertrouwd met het werk van Wolff en Deken. Zij kende de details en zij overzag het geheel. Toch is er meteen bij verschijnen terecht kritiek geleverd op het door haar geschetste karakter- en levensbeeld. P.J. Meertens - zelf een Wolff en Deken-kenner van formaat - meende dat het boek wegens zijn gebrek aan documentatie niet de definitieve biografie was geworden die alle latere werken overbodig zou maken. Inderdaad was de schrijfster geen bronnenonderzoekster. Voor de feitelijke onderbouw steunde ze op archiefsprokkelingen van Dyserinck en Höweler. Het sprak dus wel vanzelf dat voortgezet onderzoek van deze aard nieuwe feiten en daarmee gewijzigde inzichten zou opleveren. Want het levensverhaal van Wolff en Deken kende (en kent) nog talrijke blinde plekken.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline (PDF)
    Timeline of the French Revolution 1789 1793 May 5 Estates General convened in Versailles Jan. 21 Execution of Louis XVI (and later, Marie Jun. 17 National Assembly Antoinette on Oct. 16) Jun. 20 Tennis Court Oath Feb. 1 France declares war on British and Dutch (and Jul. 11 Necker dismissed on Spain on Mar. 7) Jul. 13 Bourgeois militias in Paris Mar. 11 Counterrevolution starts in Vendée Jul. 14 Storming of the Bastille in Paris (official start of Apr. 6 Committee of Public Safety formed the French Revolution) Jun. 1-2 Mountain purges Girondins Jul. 16 Necker recalled Jul. 13 Marat assassinated Jul. 20 Great Fear begins in the countryside Jul. 27 Maximilien Robespierre joins CPS Aug. 4 Abolition of feudalism Aug. 10 Festival of Unity and Indivisibility Aug. 26 Declaration of Rights of Man and the Citizen Sept. 5 Terror the order of the day Oct. 5 Adoption of Revolutionary calendar 1791 1794 Jun. 20-21 Flight to Varennes Aug. 27 Declaration of Pillnitz Jun. 8 Festival of the Supreme Being Jul. 27 9 Thermidor: fall of Robespierre 1792 1795 Apr. 20 France declares war on Austria (and provokes Prussian declaration on Jun. 13) Apr. 5/Jul. 22 Treaties of Basel (Prussia and Spain resp.) Sept. 2-6 September massacres in Paris Oct. 5 Vendémiare uprising: “whiff of grapeshot” Sept. 20 Battle of Valmy Oct. 26 Directory established Sept. 21 Convention formally abolishes monarchy Sept. 22 Beginning of Year I (First Republic) 1797 Oct. 17 Treaty of Campoformio Nov. 21 Berlin Decree 1798 1807 Jul. 21 Battle of the Pyramids Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • The Example of the Dutch Republic for American Federalism
    The Example of the Dutch Republic for American Federalism J.W.SCHULTENORDHOLT We may derive from Holland lessons very beneficial to ourselves. John Marshall in the Convention of Virginia 1788. I History is philosophy teaching by examples. That famous saying expresses the eighteenth-century approach to the past better than long explanations. The philosophers and political scientists of the Enlightenment were eager to find examples to justify their actual deeds and opinions. Perhaps the deepest reason for this quest for an imitable past is to be found in their belief in the unity of Western civilization. There was a great chain of being, not only in space, as has been so magnificently described by Arthur Lovejoy, but also in time. The presupposition of such a belief in the cohesive patterns of the past was the conception that there had been, through the ages, a certain uniformity in human behaviour. Man had never changed, that is why history could be used as a model. As David Hume put it: Mankind are so much the same, in all times and places, that history informs us of no­ thing new or strange in this particular. Its chief use is only to discover the constant and universal principles of human nature. The task of the historian was not in the first place to understand the past for its own sake, but, as Carl Becker remarks, to choose between good and evil, 'be- tween the customs that were suited and those that were unsuited to man's nature'.1That is exactly what men like James Madison and his friends were to do during that long summer of 1787 when they drafted the Constitution.
    [Show full text]