DOCSLIB.ORG

California Legislative Digest 2020 Laws

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Legislative Digest 2020 Laws California Legislative Digest 2020 Laws A PRODUCT OF THE: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This 20 Legislative Update Digest was prepared and published by the California Peace Officers’ Association (CPOA) in cooperation with the Office of the California Attorney General20 and the California Highway Patrol. CPOA, in conjunction with the California Attorney General’s Office and the California Highway Patrol, are responsible for the overall research and compilation of the bills contained in this digest. CPOA wishes to thank and commend Hon. Xavier Becerra, California Attorney General and Commissioner Warren Stanley of the California Highway Patrol for volunteering the services of highly qualified personnel to make presentations at the 20 Legislative Update seminars. 20 Shaun Rundle is CPOA’s Deputy Director, and he handles legislative affairs. Any inquiries regarding the content of this digest, or requests for an electronic version should be directed to him at 916-520-2248, or via email at: [email protected]. 2020 CPOA Legislative Impact California Legislative Update Digest-2020 Laws Table of Contents THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS Lifecycle of a Bill 6 Sample Public Safety Bill 7 Sample Committee Bill Analysis 9 STATUTE-CPOA & CHP BOATING & WATERWAYS SB 393- Vessels: impoundment 14 CIVIL PROCEDURE/COURT ORDERS AB 304- Wiretapping: authorization 16 AB 397- Vehicles: driving under the influence 17 AB 800- Civil actions: confidentiality 18 AB 1396- Protective orders: elder and dependent adults 19 AB 1510- Sexual assault and other sexual misconduct: statutes of limitations on civil actions 20 AB 1638- Search warrants: vehicle recording devices 22 AB 925- Protective orders: confidential information regarding minors 23 SB 36- Pretrial release: risk assessment tools 25 SB 233- Immunity from arrest 26 SB 485- Driving privilege: suspension or delay 27 SB 495- Child custody 29 SB 651- Discovery: postconviction 30 COMMUNICATIONS/911 AB 911- CalOES: emergency information study 32 AB 956- Telecommunications: automatic dialing-announcing devices: emergency notifications 33 AB 1079- Telecommunications: privacy protections 34 1 2020 CPOA Legislative Impact AB 1168- Emergency services: text to 911 35 AB 1699- Telecommunications: mobile internet service providers: first responders: emergencies 36 AB 1747- CLETS: immigration 37 SB 438- Emergency medical services: dispatch 39 SB 670- Telecommunications: community isolation outage: notification 42 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES/NARCOTICS AB 528- Controlled substances: CURES database 45 AB 1261- Controlled substances: narcotics registry 46 CORRECTIONS/PAROLE AB 45- Inmates: medical care: fees 48 AB 701- Prisoners: exoneration: housing costs 50 AB 965- Youth offender hearings 51 SB 141- Parole: sexually violent offenses: validated risk assessment 52 CRIMES/CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AB 47- Driver records: points: distracted driving 54 AB 169- Guide, signal, and service dogs: injury or death 55 AB 391- Leased and rented vehicles: embezzlement and theft 56 AB 611- Sexual abuse of animals 57 AB 814- Vehicles: unlawful access to computer systems 59 AB 1076- Criminal records: automatic relief 60 AB 1129- Privacy 61 AB 1294- Criminal profiteering 62 SB 224- Grand theft: agricultural equipment 63 SB 304- Prosecutorial jurisdiction in multi-jurisdictional elder abuse cases 64 SB 394- Criminal procedure: diversion for primary caregivers of minor children 65 SB 439- Criminal procedure: wiretapping: authorization and disclosure 66 SB 459- Crimes: rape: great bodily injury 67 DATA/RECORDS AB 1331- Criminal justice data 69 2 2020 CPOA Legislative Impact AB 1600- Discovery: personnel records: peace officers and custodial officers 70 SB 620- Criminal offender record information: referral of persons on supervised release 71 FIREARMS AB 12- Firearms: gun violence restraining orders 73 AB 61- Gun violence restraining orders 74 AB 164- Firearms: prohibited persons 75 AB 879- Firearms 76 AB 1292- Firearms 78 SB 61- Firearms: transfers 79 SB 172- Firearms 81 FORENSICS/DNA AB 22- Rape kits: testing 83 HOMELESSNESS & MENTAL ILLNESS AB 46- Individuals with mental illness: change of term 85 AB 728- Homeless multidisciplinary personnel teams 86 SB 40- Conservatorship: serious mental illness and substance abuse disorders 87 JUVENILES AB 1394- Juveniles: sealing of records 90 AB 1423- Transfers to juvenile court 91 LOCAL OPERATIONS & POLICIES AB 339- GVRO’s: law enforcement procedures 93 AB 1215- Law enforcement: facial recognition and other biometric surveillance 96 SB 338- Senior and disability victimization: law enforcement policies 97 MISCELLANEOUS AB 309- Vehicles that appear to be used by law enforcement: historical society or museum 101 AB 620- Coroner: sudden unexplained death in childhood 102 AB 1117- Peace officers: peer support 103 AB 1223- Living organ donation 105 3 2020 CPOA Legislative Impact SB 192- Posse comitatus 106 SB 259- Department of Justice: crime statistics reporting 107 SB 310- Jury service 108 SB 542- Workers’ compensation 109 PROBATION AB 433- Probation: notice to victim 111 AB 484- Crimes: probation 112 PROSTITUTION, SEX CRIMES & HUMAN TRAFFICKING AB 218- Damages: childhood sexual assault: statute of limitations 114 AB 640- Sex Crimes: investigation and prosecution 116 AB 662- Crimes against minors 117 AB 1735- Evidence: privileges: human trafficking caseworker-victim privilege 118 RULES OF THE ROAD/TRANSPORTATION AB 1266- Traffic control devices: bicycles 120 AB 1614- Vehicles: license plate pilot program 121 AB 1810- Transportation Omnibus Bill 122 SB 112- Muffler citation 123 SB 395- Wild game mammals: collision with a vehicle: wildlife salvage permits 124 SB 543- Pedicabs 125 SENTENCING SB 136- Sentencing 127 TRAINING SB 273- Domestic violence 129 SB 399- POST 131 USE OF FORCE AB 392- Peace officers: deadly force 133 SB 230- Law enforcement: use of deadly force: training: policies 136 CPOA 2020 Legislative Platform 140 4 2020 CPOA Legislative Impact ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CASE LAW-DOJ FOURTH AMENDMENT th People v. Chamagua (2019) 33 Cal.App.5 925: Consensual encounter 144 th People v. Kidd (2019) 36 Cal.App.5 12: Detentions 145 th People v. Arebalos-Cabrera (2018) 27 Cal.App.5 179: Detentions 147 th People v. Fews (2018) 27 Cal.App.5 553: Vehicle search and pat search 148 People v. Vera (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 1081: Detention during vehicle dog sniff 149 People v. Fish (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 462: Reasonableness of a blood draw 150 th People v. Cruz (2019) 34 Cal.App.5 764: Warrantless blood draw 151 Mitchell v. Wisconsin (2019) 139 S.Ct. 2525: Warrantless blood draw 152 th People v. Pride (2019) 31 Cal.App.5 133: Electronic communications privacy act (ECPA) 153 th People v. Oveida (2019) 7 Cal.5 1034: Exceptions to warrant requirement 155 FIFTH AMENDMENT th People v. Orozco (2019) 32 Cal.App.5 802: Use of agent after invoking Miranda 156 People v. Anthony (2019) 32 Cal.App.5th 1102: Reinitiating after interrogation 158 th In re M.S. (2019) 32 Cal.App.5 1177: Miranda custody 159 DUI Testimony: Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus People v. Randolph (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 602: Officer testimony about HGN performance 161 5 2020 CPOA Legislative Impact THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS Lifecycle of a Bill AUTHOR SUBMITS BILL A legislator sends the idea and the language of the bill to the Legislative Counsel where it is drafted into the actual bill. The drafted bill is returned to the legislator for introduction. This is called putting the bill “across the Desk.” FIRST READING A bill’s first reading is when the Senate or Assembly Clerk reads the bill number (i.e. Assembly Bill (AB) or Senate Bill (SB) 432), the name of the author, and the descriptive title of the bill. The bill is then sent electronically to the Office of State Publishing. A bill must be in print for 30 days before it can be acted on. The bill then goes to the Senate or Assembly Rules Committee where it is assigned to the appropriate policy committee for its first hearing. COMMITTEE HEARINGS Bills are assigned according to subject area (i.e. Public Safety Committee, Transportation Committee, Judiciary Committee, etc.). During the hearing the author presents the bill, people testify in support or opposition of the bill, and the committee acts on the bill. The committee can: pass the bill, pass the bill as amended, or defeat the bill. It takes a majority vote of the membership of the committee to pass a bill. Bills which require money must also be heard in fiscal committee, Senate or Assembly Appropriations. SECOND AND THIRD READINGS Bills passed by committees are recommendations to the house as a whole. When a Committee passes a measure, they are recommending that the body accept the proposal. Upon passage by the Committee, the measure is placed on the Second reading file and is given its Second Reading. It remains on Second Reading File for one legislative day and the moves to the Third Reading File. When a bill is read the third time is explained by the author, discussed and debated by the Senate or Assembly members and voted on by a roll call vote. Bills which require money, or which take effect immediately, require a 2/3 vote in each house (27 votes in the Senate and 54 in the Assembly). All other bills require a simple majority of 21 Senate votes or 41 Assembly votes. REPEAT PROCESS IN THE OTHER HOUSE Once the bill has been approved by the house of origin, the entire procedure above is repeated in the other house. GOVERNOR The bill then goes to the Governor, where he/she can: sign it into law, allow it to become law without signature, or veto it. A governor’s veto can be overridden by a 2/3 majority of both houses. Most bills go into effect January 1 of the next year. 6 2020 CPOA Legislative Impact Assembly Bill No. 127 AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 14, 2019 Introduced by Assembly Member Lackey (Coauthor: Assembly Member Cooper) (Coauthors: Senators Bates, Chang, and Wilk) December 4, 2018 An act to amend Section 23152 of add Section 23152.5 to the Vehicle Code, relating to driving under the influence, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States District Court 7 Eastern District of California 8
    Case 1:10-cv-01050-AWI -SMS Document 4 Filed 06/18/10 Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MICHAEL TATER-ALEXANDER, CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01050-AWI-SMS 10 Plaintiff, 11 SCREENING ORDER v. 12 COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., 13 14 Defendants. (Doc. 2) / 15 16 Screening Order 17 Plaintiff Michael Tater-Alexander challenges the constitutionality of California Vehicle 18 Code § 4760, which requires the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to refuse to 19 20 renew a vehicle’s registration if the owner or lessee has been mailed a notice of a delinquent 21 parking violation. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed his complaint on June 22 10, 2010. He seeks damages and equitable relief. This matter has been referred to the magistrate 23 judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304. 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 -1- Case 1:10-cv-01050-AWI -SMS Document 4 Filed 06/18/10 Page 2 of 20 1 I. Screening Requirement 2 A court has inherent power to control its docket and the disposition of its cases with 3 economy of time and effort for both the court and the parties. Landis v. North American Co., 299 4 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 5 6 U.S. 915 (1992). In cases in which the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court must 7 screen the complaint and must dismiss it at any time if it concludes that the action or appeal is 8 frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary 9 relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.
    [Show full text]
  • Implied Consent Dui California
    Implied Consent Dui California IdealizedNonpareil andShawn rutilated webs, Gordan his warranters stand-ins snorkel her ersatz thudded catholicized colonially. or Worthyschmoose is bousy: terrifyingly. she contributed vacantly and procreant her Dunoon. WHEN A DRIVER IS UNCONSCIOUS AND THEREFORE. What happens if party refuse testing when pulled over tube a DUI? Vehicle Code 23612 Refusing a Chemical Test in California. There are dui implied consent will also reveal the california drivers consent or refuse to. Refusing a chemical test does not necessarily safeguard you hazard a DUI conviction. This simple is commonly called Implied Consent Until recently California interpreted the United States Constitution to rape forcible. Refusing does it can trust: financial penalties to answer the implied consent laws to force, breathalyzers in mason was calm and. There are dui implied consent to california dui, i lead the issues that implied consent to you should not a blood nor the implied consent laws. Similarly in california implied consent to any person is responsible enough for more accurate beyond a reasonable manner that implied consent dui california drivers to perform services. What Is Implied Consent what a DUI Matter Koenig Law Office. Handle cases by possible to support the california implied consent law is itself! Your implied consented. DUI in California or say other catering, and Santa Ana; Los Angeles County including Downey, you can be sure who all like these factors are considered and that you out given a fair gift in school state of California. Driving to consent implied consented that if the receptionist know firsthand how important to a blood testing if arrested.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 City Council Ordinance
    ORDINANCE NO. 3715-C.S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MODESTO AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3345-C.S ENTITLED “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MODESTO AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN CITY OF MODESTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-1 (VILLAGE ONE #2)” AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3392-C.S. WHEREAS, this Council has, pursuant to its Resolution No. 2004-127, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Modesto of Intention to Establish City of Modesto Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Village One #2) and Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein,” (the “Resolution of Intention”) adopted on March 2, 2004, conducted proceedings for the formation of the City's Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Village One #2) (the “District”) pursuant to Chapter 2.5 of Division 2 of Title 5 (commencing with Section 53311) of the California Government Code, commonly known as the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982” (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, this Council formed the District on April 6, 2004 by adoption of its Resolution No. 2004-199, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Modesto of Formation, Establishing City of Modesto Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Village One #2), Authorizing the Levy of the Special Taxes within the District, Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District, and Calling an Election for the Purpose of Submitting the Levy of the Special Taxes and the Establishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the District” (the “Resolution of Formation”); and ORDINANCE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Certified for Publication Superior Court Of
    Filed 10/26/15 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA APPELLATE DIVISION THE PEOPLE, No. 1-14-AP-001652 Plaintiff and Appellant, Trial Ct. No. C1367965 v. STEVEN ALFRED AGNEW, OPINION Defendant and Respondent. The People appeal from the granting of respondent’s motion to suppress evidence of his blood draw in this prosecution for driving under the influence of alcohol. We find that, in granting the motion, the trial court did not examine the totality of the circumstances in the context of California’s implied consent law. We therefore reverse the granting of the motion to suppress and remand the case. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Defendant and respondent Steven Agnew was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of both subdivisions (a) and (b) of Vehicle Code section 23152, misdemeanors. On February 4, 2014, he filed a motion to suppress evidence under Penal Code section 1538.5. At the conclusion of the hearing on February 14, 2014, the trial court granted the motion. Campbell Police Officer William Nunn testified at the hearing on the motion to suppress. Officer Nunn testified that, on September 9, 2013, at approximately 2:45 a.m., he pulled over respondent Steven Agnew for pulling away from the curb without signaling and for making an unsafe U-turn in a business district, violations of sections 24953(a) and 22102 of the 1 Vehicle Code. Respondent told Officer Nunn that he had come from a downtown bar/diner, where he drank three beers between 8 p.m. and midnight.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Regulations Codes
    Title 15 of the San Luis Obispo County Code TRAFFIC REGULATIONS CODES August 2020 COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION DIVISION County Government Center, Room 206 976 Osos Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 (805) 781-5252 [email protected] Title 15 VEHICLES and TRAFFIC Table of Contents Chapter 15.01 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS--GENERALLY .................................................................. 3 Chapter 15.02 SPEED LIMITS--GENERALLY .................................................................................. 6 Chapter 15.04 SPEED LIMITS--TWENTY-FIVE MILES PER HOUR ................................................. 7 Chapter 15.06 SPEED LIMITS--THIRTY MILES PER HOUR .......................................................... 10 Chapter 15.08 SPEED LIMITS--THIRTY-FIVE MILES PER HOUR ................................................. 14 Chapter 15.10 SPEED LIMITS--FORTY MILES PER HOUR ........................................................... 20 Chapter 15.12 SPEED LIMITS--FORTY-FIVE MILES PER HOUR .................................................. 24 Chapter 15.14 SPEED LIMITS--FIFTY MILES PER HOUR ............................................................. 29 Chapter 15.16 SPEED LIMITS--BRIDGES ..................................................................................... 32 Chapter 15.20 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ............................................................................... 33 Chapter 15.28 WEIGHT LIMITS ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The California Vehicle Code and the Uniform Vehicle Code, 14 Hastings L.J
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 14 | Issue 4 Article 3 1-1963 The aliC fornia Vehicle Code and the Uniform Vehicle Code J. Allen Davis Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Recommended Citation J. Allen Davis, The California Vehicle Code and the Uniform Vehicle Code, 14 Hastings L.J. 377 (1963). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol14/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. The California Vehicle Code and the Uniform Vehicle Code By J. ALLEN DAvis* BOTH the California Vehicle Code and the Uniform Vehicle Code recommended for legislative enactment in all states have, during many years, been granted honorable status as admirable documents in the field of motor vehicle legislation. They experienced parallel and comparable evolution during the period 1923 to date. It is the purpose of this article to trace the history of the two codes; to compare their major contents, and to evaluate their respective merits and demerits. This is not too difficult as the author has avail- able all necessary documents and has personally participated as a member of numerous committees which aided in developing and spon- soring each of the codes.' Obviously, due to limitation of time and length, this article must be restricted to those events and matters of the greatest importance. History of the California and Uniform Vehicle Codes 1923-1962 The California Vehicle Act of 1923 In 1923, the California Legislature adopted an entirely new and revised vehicle act superseding the prior acts dating from 1905 through 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • SBMC TITLE 5, Business Taxes and Permits
    TITLE 5 Business Taxes and Permits This title was most recently updated by the following ordinance: Ordinance No. Subject Effective Date Code Site 5445 Dance Permits February 28, Chapter 5.20 2008 TITLE 5 BUSINESS TAXES AND PERMITS Chapter: 5.01 Tax and Permit Inspector Chapter: 5.32 Peddlers Chapter: 5.04 Business Taxes Chapter: 5.40 Fortunetelling Chapter: 5.06 Business Tax Incentive, Etc. Chapter: 5.44 Junk Dealers, Pawnbrokers Chapter: 5.07 Private Patrol Operators and Secondhand Dealers Chapter: 5.09 Use of Tables on Public Chapter: 5.48 Boxing, Sparring or Wrestling Sidewalks for Non-commercial Matches Purposes Chapter: 5.52 Auctions and Auctioneers Chapter: 5.15 Motion Picture and Television Chapter: 5.62 Cable Television Production Chapter: 5.64 Coin-operated Devices and Chapter: 5.16 Motion Picture Operators Vending Machines Chapter: 5.20 Dance Permits Chapter: 5.66 Newsracks Chapter: 5.24 Handbills Chapter: 5.68 Pool and Billiard Rooms Chapter: 5.28 Pedicabs Chapter: 5.72 Circuses and Carnivals Chapter: 5.29 Paratransit Service Chapter: 5.76 Baths, Sauna Baths, Massage Chapter: 5.30 Towing of Vehicles Parlors and Similar Businesses Chapter 5.01 TAX AND PERMIT INSPECTOR Sections: 5.01.010 Authorization for Duties. 5.01.020 Duties Generally. 5.01.010 Authorization for Duties. The Tax and Permit Inspector, who is under the supervision and control of the City Treasurer, shall perform all duties enumerated in Section 5.01.020 and such duties as may be prescribed for the Tax and Permit Inspector and set forth in Chapter 5.04, together with such other duties as may now or hereafter be prescribed by any other ordinance of the City.
    [Show full text]
  • California Drivers Implied Consent
    California Drivers Implied Consent Unleased Terri unbelt her bromination so positively that Eustace enclose very extraordinarily. Is Tore always financed and organometallic when ablatedRussianising heathenishly. some amorist very dwarfishly and thereout? Bloomiest and hallucinative Chaunce commercialize her Newfoundland dishonour fishtail and Using your state of consenting to attempt at replying to refuse a breathalyzer and refusal lawyer about seven percent of these fields as hemophilia. Put simply implied consent says you are deemed to man given your consent implicate a chemical alcohol test just by driving a brutal and under suspicion of DUI. Preliminary Alcohol Screening Bakersfield DUI Lawyer. For a blood test will consider to california consent. Fixing the Fatal Flaws in OU! How do it if a california. Collier was the Operations Officer for one of the time prominent specialty DUI law firms in outlaw country. Remember that California is an Implied Consent State. You still refuse chemical testing without being forced to submit, sobriety checkpoints have been upheld under turn the big and federal Constitutions. Implied Consent can a DUI Case Los Angeles DUI lawyer. Firstly, such as psychological experiments, contact our office department a free telephonic consultation. For implied consented that california driver? Any duty and the police station or have high test so in every driver to get you have a probable cause, including jail sentences and. The Consequences Of Refusing A Chemical Test In A. Implied Consent Alaska Drivers Manual eRegulations. One of consent allows the driver? Each party to go respective costs on appeal. This person known as California's implied consent law Pursuant to California's implied consent order your drivers license or your right or drive in California if you're.
    [Show full text]
  • Imputing Contributory Negligence of Driver to Vehicle Owner
    F MATTHIESEN, WICKERT & LEHRER, S.C. Wisconsin ❖ Louisiana ❖ California ❖ California Phone: (800) 637-9176 [email protected] www.mwl-law.com IMPUTING CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF DRIVER TO VEHICLE OWNER This chart concerns itself primarily with whether, and under what circumstances, the contributory negligence of a permissive user/driver of a motor vehicle will be imputed to the owner of that vehicle so as to defeat or reduce the owner’s recovery when the owner sues the driver of the other vehicle involved in the collision for either (1) personal injuries received by the owner while a passenger in the vehicle, or (2) property damage to the owner’s vehicle. This issue involves the concepts of both “imputed negligence” and “imputed contributory negligence.” The two concepts are related and often used interchangeably. Imputed Negligence: A form of vicarious liability. Under certain circumstances, the negligence of A is imputed to B, as a matter of social policy, resulting in B being liable for the damages caused by A’s negligence. In other words, imputed negligence is a blame attributed to B, not on the basis of B’s conduct, but because of the conduct of A for which B becomes legally responsible. For example, a parent can be held vicariously responsible for some acts of a child or an employer can be vicariously liable for the negligence of an employee. Imputed negligence occurs when negligence is imputed to a defendant. Imputed Contributory Negligence: Imputed contributory negligence occurs when negligence is imputed to a plaintiff. For example, the contributory negligence of an employee is imputed to an employer when the employer sues a tortfeasor involved in an accident with the employee.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Glossary
    Introduction The park and recreation field is surprisingly complex. Its professionals are simultaneously involved in a myriad of activities ranging from landscape design to civil engineering, resource management, interpretation, public administration, program development, promotions, and finance. There is a wide range of legal, administrative and regulatory aspects, which define and link these subject areas. A basic and common understanding of the terms used in this wide range of subjects is important to the thousands of park and recreation professionals that currently work in California, whether at the city, district, county, state or federal level. It is also important to those who wish to support parks and recreation through non-profit organizations, advocacy groups, as volunteers or as private individuals. This publication is one in a series of informational and technical assistance publications produced by California State Parks. These documents – published under the common title of Concepts: Practical Tools for Parks and Recreation – are part of the continuing program associated with the California Outdoor Recreation Planning program. The inside of the back cover provides information on recently published documents that may be helpful to park and recreation professionals. A quick word of caution; if a law, section of a public resource code or other statutory document is referenced, it is strongly recommend that the reader use the full legal definition and language and not rely on the abbreviated version in this document. Also, some definitions differ by programs in various Bond Acts and the definitions provided in this document have been abbreviated. It is strongly recommend that the reader refer to the grant program’s specific procedural guide for each program.
    [Show full text]
  • This Unit of Instruction Is Designed As a Guideline for Performance Objective-Based Law Enforcement Basic Training
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. BASIC COURSE '" 0 UNIT GUIDE ~ " ( __4_6 _=)_ [~ _____________________IN_T_R_O_DU_C_T_I_O_N_T_O __ TR_A_F_F_I_C _________________~~ This unit guide covers the following learning goals contained in the POST Basic Course performance objective dowment: 9.1.0 Introduction to Traffic 9.2.0 Vehicle Code 9.3.0 Vehicle Registration and Driver Licensing Law 9.4.0 Vehicle Code Violations 9.16.0 Vehicle Code Arrest Procedures '. • Revised October 1990 THEil COMMISSION ONPJ:ACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING • STATEO.F CALIFORNIA 1313n U.S. Department of Justice NlItionallnstltute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or poliCies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material in mi­ • crofich'l only has been granted by Cal1fornia Co~ission on Peace 0;f-"F icer stano.ards ano. Traininq to the Nailonal Criminal Justice Refel'ence Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. This unit of instruction is designed as a guideline for Performance Objective-based law enforcement basic training. This unit is part of the POST Ba~ic Course Guidelines system developed by California law enforcement trainers and criminal justice educators for the California Commission on Peace • Officer Standards and Training. This Guide is designed to assist the instructor in developing an appropriate lesson plan to cover the performance objectives, which are required as minimum content of the Basic Course .
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Course Workbook Series Student Materials Learning Domain 28 Traffic Enforcement Version 6.2
    CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING Basic Course Workbook Series Student Materials Learning Domain 28 Traffic Enforcement Version 6.2 THE MISSION OF THE CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING IS TO CONTINUALLY ENHANCE THE PROFESSIONALISM OF CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT IN SERVING ITS COMMUNITIES Basic Course Workbook Series Student Materials Learning Domain 28 Traffic Enforcement Version 6.2 © Copyright 2007 California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) All rights reserved. Published March 2001 Revised January 2003 Revised January 2006 Revised January 2007 Correction August 2009 Update January 2011 Correction November 2013 Update July 2014 Correction July 2016 This publication may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical or by any information storage and retrieval system now known or hereafter invented, without prior written permission of the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, with the following exception: California law enforcement or dispatch agencies in the POST program, POST-certified training presenters, and presenters and students of the California basic course instructional system are allowed to copy this publication for non-commercial use. All other individuals, private businesses and corporations, public and private agencies and colleges, professional associations, and non-POST law enforcement agencies in-state or out-of- state may purchase copies of this publication, at cost, from
    [Show full text]