DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Glossary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Introduction The park and recreation field is surprisingly complex. Its professionals are simultaneously involved in a myriad of activities ranging from landscape design to civil engineering, resource management, interpretation, public administration, program development, promotions, and finance. There is a wide range of legal, administrative and regulatory aspects, which define and link these subject areas. A basic and common understanding of the terms used in this wide range of subjects is important to the thousands of park and recreation professionals that currently work in California, whether at the city, district, county, state or federal level. It is also important to those who wish to support parks and recreation through non-profit organizations, advocacy groups, as volunteers or as private individuals. This publication is one in a series of informational and technical assistance publications produced by California State Parks. These documents – published under the common title of Concepts: Practical Tools for Parks and Recreation – are part of the continuing program associated with the California Outdoor Recreation Planning program. The inside of the back cover provides information on recently published documents that may be helpful to park and recreation professionals. A quick word of caution; if a law, section of a public resource code or other statutory document is referenced, it is strongly recommend that the reader use the full legal definition and language and not rely on the abbreviated version in this document. Also, some definitions differ by programs in various Bond Acts and the definitions provided in this document have been abbreviated. It is strongly recommend that the reader refer to the grant program’s specific procedural guide for each program. 1 ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS 404 Permits Permits required by federal agencies for any activity impacting navigable waters, such as development of recreational boating facilities or conversion of wetlands. 501(c)(3) Charitable organizations/foundations – Federally registered (IRS) AALR American Association for Leisure and Recreation AAPRA American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration AARP American Association of Retired Persons AASLH American Association for State and local History AB Assembly Bill AC Archaeological Conservancy ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ADA Americans with Disabilities Act AF Acre Foot AFRS Armed Forces Recreation Society AHR Americans for our Heritage and Recreation AIRFA American Indian Religious Freedom Act ALC American Land Conservancy AMA American Motorcyclists Association APA American Planning Association APE Area of Potential Effect (Section 106, NHPA) APN Assessor’s Parcel Number APRS American Park and Recreation Society APWA American Public Works Association ARMR Archaeological Resource Protection Act ASLA American Society of Landscape Architects ASR Archaeological Survey Report ATB All Terrain Bike ATRA American Therapeutic Recreation Association ATV All Terrain Vehicle(s) AV Assessed Valuation BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs BLM Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Dept. of the Interior BMP Best Management Practice BOT Board of Trustees BRC Blue Ribbon Coalition BSC California Building Standards Commission CAC Citizen Advisory Committee CALBO California Association of Local Building Officials CalCOG California Association of Councils of Government Cal EPA California Environmental Protection Agency CalTRANS California Department of Transportation CAP Council of Affiliated Presidents CAPRA Commission Accreditation and Recreation Agencies CAPRCBM California Association of Park and Recreation Commissioners and Board Members CAPRI California Association for Park and Recreation Insurance CARA Conservation Reinvestment Act (proposed successor to the Land & Water Conservation Fund) CARA Lite Abridged version of the Conservation Reinvestment Act CARB California Air Resources Board CARPD California Association of Recreation and Park Districts 2 ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS (continued) CARPOSA California Association of Regional Parks and Open Space Administrators CASSP California Archaeological Site Steward Program CBM Citizen Board Member CBO Community Based Organization CBRPC California Board of Recreation and Park Certification CC Civil Code CCC California Conservation Corps or California Coastal Commission or Civilian Conservation Corps CCHS Conference of California Historical Societies CCMP California Coastal Management Program CCPH California Council for the Promotion of History CCR California Code of Regulations CCSO Cultural and Community Studies Office CDBG Community Development Block Grant CDF California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CED Council of Executive Directors CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFD Community Facilities District CFRs Code of Federal Regulations CFS Cubic Feet Per Second CHP California Highway Patrol CHRIGE California Historical Resources Information GIS Environment CHRIS California Historical Resources Information System CHS California Historical Society CIP Capital Improvement Program CLCA California Land Conservation Act (a.k.a The Williamson Act) CLG Certified Local Government CLORV California League of Off-Road Voters CLR Cultural/Historic Landscape Report COA Certificate of Appropriateness COBRA Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act COE (U.S. Army) Corps of Engineers COG Council of Governments COLA Cost of Living Adjustment CORP California Outdoor Recreation Plan CORVA California Off-Road Vehicle Association CPEP Center for Preservation Education and Planning CPF California Preservation Foundation CPI Consumer Price Index CPRP Certified Park and Recreation Professional CPRS California Park and Recreation Society CRHR California Register of Historical Resources CRM Cultural Resources Management CRMP Coordinated Resource Management Plan CRTS Commercial Recreation and Tourism Society CSAC California State Association of Counties CSD Community Services District CSDA California Special Districts Association CSHBSB California State Historical Building Safety Board CSP California State Parks CSPRA California State Park Rangers Association 3 ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS (continued) CTC County Transportation Commission CUP Conditional Use Permit CVC California Vehicle Code CVPIA Central Valley Project Improvement Act CWHR California Wildlife Habitat Relationships DBW Department of Boating and Waterways DEA Division of Environmental Analysis DEBC District Environmental Branch Chief DEIR Draft Environmental Impact Report DFG California Department of Fish and Game DNAC District Native American Coordinator DOC California Department of Conservation DOE Determination of Eligibility DOT (U.S.) Department of Transportation DPR California Department of Parks and Recreation DRP Data Recovery Plan DSHPO Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer EA Environmental Assessment EBC Environmental Branch Chief EBCC East Bay Conservation Corps EC Education Code EDF Environmental Defense Fund EEM Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation EEMP Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement ELP Environmental Living Programs EMS Ethnic Minority Society EO Executive Order EOC (OES) Emergency Operations Centers EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ERAF Education Revenue Augmentation Fund ERS European Recreation Society ESA Endangered Species Act or Environmentally Sensitive Area ESHA Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area ESP Environmental Studies Programs FAR Floor Area Ratio FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FHWA Federal Highway Administration FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact FPO Federal Preservation Officer FTE Full Time Equivalent FUDS Formerly Used Defense Site FWS Fish and Wildlife Service GC Government Code GIS Geographical Information System Gov. Code (§) Government Code Section GP General Plan HABS Historic American Building Survey (NPS program) 4 ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS (continued) HAER Historic American Engineering Recordation (NPS program) HCD Housing and Community Development (State) HCF Habitat Conservation Fund HCLP Habitat Conservation Land-Use Planning HCP Habitat Conservation Plan HMO Health Maintenance Organization HP Historic Preservation HPF Historic Preservation Fund HPSR Historic Property Survey Report HRCR Historical Resources Compliance Report HRER Historical Resources Evaluation Report HUD (U.S. Department of) Housing and Urban Development HWRF Harbors and Watercraft Revolving Fund IC Information Center ID Irrigation District IFD Infrastructure Financing District IHS Institute for Historical Study IMBA International Mountain Bike Association ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (1991) JPA Joint Powers Agreement LAFCO Local Agency Formation Commission LA’s Landscape Architects LAS Leisure and Aging Section LCP Local Coastal Program L & L Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District (L&LAD or LLD) LESA Land Evaluation and Site Assessment LOS Level of Service LUP Land Use Plan LWCF Land and Water Conservation Fund MAC Municipal Advisory Council (or committee) MOA Memorandum of Agreement MOU Memorandum of Understanding MSL Minimum Service Level NAB National Aquatic Branch NAC Statewide Native American Coordinator NAGPRA Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NAI National Association for Interpretation NARRP National Association of Recreation
Recommended publications
  • Historic Districts For

    Historic Districts For

    historic districts for all Brochure designed for local authorities September 2007 a social and human approach for sustainable revitalization sustainable for approach human and social a THE CHALLENGE FOR HISTORIC DISTRICTS TODAY For over a decade, the Social and Human Sciences Sector of UNESCO has been tasked Historic districts symbolize the cities: they forge the cultural identity and quality « with studying cities as « Arenas of accelerated social transformations ». During the of urban life; they direct the modern development of the area. In many cities, Second United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, which took place in Istanbul the revitalization of these districts meets with highly positive and encouraging in 1996 (HABITAT II), a Round Table was organized by UNESCO on « Democracy and results. citizenship in the city of the twenty-first century ». Since then, under the MOST Programme, several international comparative research projects have drawn attention to the different It is possible to conciliate conservation and protection of urban heritage, economic components of inclusive cities in the world. Projects such as « Small historical coastal cities », development, functionality and liveability of a city, and respond to the needs of its « Old Beijing », « Rehabilitation of Quito’s historic centre » and « Social sustainability of inhabitants while enhancing in a sustainable way the natural and cultural resources historic districts » have been carried out in cooperation with all UNESCO Sectors. of the city. From « HABITAT II » in 1996 to the international seminar UNESCO organized in Beijing in January 2007 on « balanced urbanization between social cohesion, economic development and heritage conservation », major indicators and parameters for strengthening social cohesion in historic districts have been identified by the Social and Human Sciences Sector Revitalization means reaching a satisfactory balance of UNESCO.
  • Tol, Xeer, and Somalinimo: Recognizing Somali And

    Tol, Xeer, and Somalinimo: Recognizing Somali And

    Tol , Xeer , and Somalinimo : Recognizing Somali and Mushunguli Refugees as Agents in the Integration Process A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Vinodh Kutty IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY David M. Lipset July 2010 © Vinodh Kutty 2010 Acknowledgements A doctoral dissertation is never completed without the help of many individuals. And to all of them, I owe a deep debt of gratitude. Funding for this project was provided by two block grants from the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota and by two Children and Families Fellowship grants from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. These grants allowed me to travel to the United Kingdom and Kenya to conduct research and observe the trajectory of the refugee resettlement process from refugee camp to processing for immigration and then to resettlement to host country. The members of my dissertation committee, David Lipset, my advisor, Timothy Dunnigan, Frank Miller, and Bruce Downing all provided invaluable support and assistance. Indeed, I sometimes felt that my advisor, David Lipset, would not have been able to write this dissertation without my assistance! Timothy Dunnigan challenged me to honor the Somali community I worked with and for that I am grateful because that made the dissertation so much better. Frank Miller asked very thoughtful questions and always encouraged me and Bruce Downing provided me with detailed feedback to ensure that my writing was clear, succinct and organized. I also have others to thank. To my colleagues at the Office of Multicultural Services at Hennepin County, I want to say “Thank You Very Much!” They all provided me with the inspiration to look at the refugee resettlement process more critically and dared me to suggest ways to improve it.
  • United States District Court 7 Eastern District of California 8

    United States District Court 7 Eastern District of California 8

    Case 1:10-cv-01050-AWI -SMS Document 4 Filed 06/18/10 Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MICHAEL TATER-ALEXANDER, CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01050-AWI-SMS 10 Plaintiff, 11 SCREENING ORDER v. 12 COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., 13 14 Defendants. (Doc. 2) / 15 16 Screening Order 17 Plaintiff Michael Tater-Alexander challenges the constitutionality of California Vehicle 18 Code § 4760, which requires the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to refuse to 19 20 renew a vehicle’s registration if the owner or lessee has been mailed a notice of a delinquent 21 parking violation. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed his complaint on June 22 10, 2010. He seeks damages and equitable relief. This matter has been referred to the magistrate 23 judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304. 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 -1- Case 1:10-cv-01050-AWI -SMS Document 4 Filed 06/18/10 Page 2 of 20 1 I. Screening Requirement 2 A court has inherent power to control its docket and the disposition of its cases with 3 economy of time and effort for both the court and the parties. Landis v. North American Co., 299 4 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 5 6 U.S. 915 (1992). In cases in which the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court must 7 screen the complaint and must dismiss it at any time if it concludes that the action or appeal is 8 frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary 9 relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.
  • 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems

    2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems

    NCES 2019 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems JUNE 2019 Doug Geverdt National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education ii U.S. Department of Education Betsy DeVos Secretary Institute of Education Sciences Mark Schneider Director National Center for Education Statistics James L. Woodworth Commissioner Administrative Data Division Ross Santy Associate Commissioner The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data related to education in the United States and other nations. It fulfills a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, and report full and complete statistics on the condition of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports and specialized analyses of the meaning and significance of such statistics; assist state and local education agencies in improving their statistical systems; and review and report on education activities in foreign countries. NCES activities are designed to address high-priority education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status and trends; and report timely, useful, and high-quality data to the U.S. Department of Education, Congress, states, other education policymakers, practitioners, data users, and the general public. Unless specifically noted, all information contained herein is in the public domain. We strive to make our products available in a variety of formats and in language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences.
  • New York City Council Districts and Asian Communities (2018)

    New York City Council Districts and Asian Communities (2018)

    New York City Council Districts and Asian Communities (2018) 25, which includes Jackson Heights, Queens; District 38 encompassing Sunset Park, Brooklyn; and As our City Council starts this new term with 11 Introduction District 24, which include parts of Jamaica, Queens. new members and 40 returning members, the Asian American Federation has compiled data from Almost three in four Asian New Yorkers are the 2015 American Community Survey (ACS) on the immigrants. Overall, 26 percent of all immigrants Asian populations for each of the City Council citywide are Asians. Council District 20 has the Districts.1 We will highlight the growth in each highest percent of Asian immigrants among all district’s Asian population and highlight the Asian immigrant populations, accounting for 79 percent languages most commonly spoken in each district. of all immigrants in the district. District 1 has the second largest Asian immigrant population, with 66 percent of all immigrants, followed by District 23 at 60 percent; District 19 at 54 percent; District 38 at The Asian population continues to be the fastest Overall Asian Population 51 percent; and District 43 at 48 percent. growing major race and ethnic group in New York City. According to the most recent Census Bureau As Asian immigrants and their families become population estimates, the Asian population in New more established, they have become a growing part York City reached 1.23 million in 2015, accounting of the potential voter base, comprising 11 percent for nearly 15 percent of the city’s population. of the total voting-age citizen population in New York City.
  • Paris Resilience Strategy

    Paris Resilience Strategy

    Paris Resilience Strategy FLUCTUAT NEC MERGITUR Front page : Bernard Pedretti/ Mairie de Paris Anne Hidalgo, Mayor of Paris “Fluctuat nec Mergitur”, which translates to “Beaten by the waves but not sunk”, proudly announces our motto. Made official in 1853 by the Baron Haussmann, it had been used by Parisians since the 16th century. Its origins lie in the river’s history, dating back to antiquity! Urban resilience is therefore not a new trend: it is an integral part of urban discourse. The concept was, however, somewhat forgotten at the end of the 20th century, as our societies were convinced that technical solutions would be able to overcome the risks faced by our cities. Today we are confronted with new and great challenges, which affect current and future generations. Climate change, air pollution, growing inequalities, terror threats, persistent water insecurity, the migrant crisis – all these challenges bring cities to the front line. DR/Mairie de Paris Far from inducing anxiety, urban resilience offers solutions to better prepare and adapt cities, their populations, businesses and infrastructures to these I would like to express my sincere thanks to all the challenges. It also provides opportunities to create institutional, business, academic and associated new activities and jobs while improving citizens’ partners, as well as to the municipal teams, for their quality of life. contribution to this very ambitious work, which has only just begun. I also warmly thank Michael Governance, which is our ability to organise ourselves Berkowitz and 100 Resilient Cities – Pioneered by collectively with all stakeholders and to create new the Rockefeller Foundation (100RC), who have partnerships, particularly beyond the municipality, is enlightened, guided and supported us in this key to the resilience of Paris.
  • Lake Minnewashta Regional Park Master Plan

    Lake Minnewashta Regional Park Master Plan

    Lake Minnewashta Regional Park Master Plan Prepared For: Carver County Parks October 2002 Prepared By: Brauer & Associates, Ltd. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments Overview In November of 2001, Carver County Board of Commissioners retained Brauer & Associates, Ltd. to work with county staff and local citizens to complete a comprehensive master plan for Lake Minnewashta Regional Park. This document represents the results of the planning process, which was completed in the fall of 2002. The consultant team would like to thank Carver County for undertaking an open and constructive public Acknowledgments participation process for the project. This approach allowed for various perspectives to be considered on important planning issues that affected the master plan for the park. Through this process, it is believed that a responsible balance between human use of the park and its ecological protection was achieved. The consultant team would also like to thank the Carver County Parks Commission and Carver County Board for participating in this project. Their individual and collective insights were instrumental in drawing conclusions that are reasonable and responsible. The consultant team also extends a heartfelt thank you to the Carver County staff, especially Marty Walsh, County Parks Director and Roger Gustafson, County Engineer. The openness with which they approached this project paved the way for an open public process that considered all opinions to be of equal merit and worthy of due consideration. Their understanding of the larger regional context and pressing park needs and how Lake Minnewashta Park fits into the larger regional park picture was also of high value as final conclusions were drawn.
  • Human Rights and Security in Central and Southern Somalia

    Human Rights and Security in Central and Southern Somalia

    Danish 2/2004 Immigration Service ENG Human rights and security in central and southern Somalia Joint Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and British fact-finding mission to Nairobi, Kenya 7- 21 January 2004 Copenhagen, March 2004 The Danish Immigration Service Ryesgade 53 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Phone: + 45 35 36 66 00 Website: www.udlst.dk E-mail: [email protected] List of reports on fact finding missions in 2003 and 2004 Sikkerheds- og beskyttelsesforhold for minoritetsbefolkninger, kvinder og børn i Somalia Marts 2003: 1 Menneskerettighedsforhold i Burundi Maj 2003: 2 Dobbeltstraf mv. i Serbien Maj 2003:3 Joint British-Danish Fact Finding Mission to Damascus, Amman and Geneva on Conditions in Iraq August 2003: 4 Indrejse- og opholdsbetingelser for statsløse palæstinensere i Libanon November 2003: 5 Sikkerheds- og menneskeretsforhold for rohingyaer i Burma og Bangladesh December 2003: 6 Fact-finding mission til Amman vedrørende asylrelevante forhold i Irak Januar 2004: 1 Human rights and security in central and southern Somalia Marts 2004 : 2 Human rights and security in central and southern Somalia Introduction........................................................................................................................5 1 Political developments ...................................................................................................7 1.1 Peace negotiations in Kenya ......................................................................................................7 1.2 Agreement on new Transitional Charter..................................................................................10
  • Improving Special Education in New York City's District 75

    Improving Special Education in New York City's District 75

    IMPROVING SPECIAL EDUCATION IN NEW YORK CITY’S DISTRICT 75 Report of the Strategic Support Team Of the Council of the Great City Schools Submitted to the New York City Department of Education By the Council of the Great City Schools June 2008 Improving Special Education in New York City’s District 75 Table of Contents Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................... 5 Purpose and Origin of the Project................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: Overview and Background............................................................................................ 9 Chapter 2: Findings and Recommendations ................................................................................. 18 A. Organizational Structure and Operations........................................................................ 18 B. Referral of Students to District 75.................................................................................. 34 C. Teaching and Learning in District 75 Schools............................................................... 41 D. Accountability................................................................................................................. 53 Chapter 3: Summary of Recommendations .................................................................................. 60 Chapter 4. Synopsis and Discussion ............................................................................................
  • Borough, City & District Council Contact Details

    Borough, City & District Council Contact Details

    Borough, City & District Council contact details Gloucester City Council Gloucester City Council can be contacted via e-mail at [email protected], by telephone on 01452 396396, or you can make a complaint via their online feedback form at Gloucester City Council online feedback form. Postal Address: Gloucester City Council Herbert Warehouse The Docks Gloucester GL1 2EQ Cheltenham Borough Council Cheltenham Borough Council can be contacted via e-mail at [email protected], by telephone on 01242 262626, or you can make a complaint via their online feedback form at Cheltenham Borough Council online feedback form. Postal Address: Cheltenham Borough Council Municipal Offices Promenade Cheltenham GL50 9SA Cotswold District Council Cotswold District Council can be contacted via e-mail at [email protected], by telephone on 01285 623000, or you can make a complaint via their online feedback form at Cotswold District Council online feedback form. Postal Address: Cotswold District Council Trinity Road Cirencester GL7 1PX Forest of Dean District Council Forest of Dean District Council can be contacted via e-mail at [email protected], by telephone on 01594 810000, or you can make a complaint via their online feedback form at Forest of Dean District Council online feedback form. Postal Address: Forest of Dean District Council Council Offices High Street Coleford GL16 8HG Stroud District Council Stroud District Council can be contacted via e-mail at [email protected], by telephone on 01453 766321, or you can make a complaint via their online feedback form at Stroud District Council online feedback form.
  • SUBCHAPTER IX. MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS. Article 23. Municipal Election Procedure

    SUBCHAPTER IX. MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS. Article 23. Municipal Election Procedure

    SUBCHAPTER IX. MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS. Article 23. Municipal Election Procedure. § 163-279. Time of municipal primaries and elections. (a) Primaries and elections for offices filled by election of the people in cities, towns, incorporated villages, and special districts shall be held in 1973 and every two or four years thereafter as provided by municipal charter on the following days: (1) If the election is nonpartisan and decided by simple plurality, the election shall be held on Tuesday after the first Monday in November. (2) If the election is partisan, the election shall be held on Tuesday after the first Monday in November, the first primary shall be held on the second Tuesday after Labor Day, and the second primary, if required, shall be held on the fourth Tuesday before the election. (3) If the election is nonpartisan and the nonpartisan primary method of election is used, the election shall be held on Tuesday after the first Monday in November and the nonpartisan primary shall be held on the fourth Tuesday before the election. (4) If the election is nonpartisan and the election and runoff election method of election is used, the election shall be held on the fourth Tuesday before the Tuesday after the first Monday in November, and the runoff election, if required, shall be held on Tuesday after the first Monday in November. (b) Officers of sanitary districts elected in 1970 shall hold office until the first Monday in December, 1973, notwithstanding G.S. 130-126. Beginning in 1973, sanitary district elections shall be held at the times provided in this section or in G.S.
  • Consolidated Plan 2020-24 Annual Action Plan 2020-21 Substantial Amendment

    Consolidated Plan 2020-24 Annual Action Plan 2020-21 Substantial Amendment

    CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA CONSOLIDATED PLAN 2020-24 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2020-21 SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of Substantial Amendments 5 Executive Summary ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 7 The Process PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) 13 PR-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and 91.315(I) 15 PR-15 Citizen Participation – 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c) 32 Needs Assessment NA-05 Overview 42 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) 43 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) 52 NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) 55 NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2) 58 NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205(b)(2) 60 NA-35 Public Housing – 91.205(b) 62 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205(c) 68 NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b,d) 75 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f) 78 Housing Market Analysis MA-05 Overview 81 MA-10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210(a)&(b)(2) 82 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) 85 MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) 88 MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210(b) 91 MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210(c) 95 MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210(d) 99 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210(e) 102 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f)