DOCSLIB.ORG

Cal-Jiforniaif You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cal-Jiforniaif You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov CAl-JIFORNIAIf you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ----- . RIMINAL • - • 144611 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material in mi- crofiche only has been granmd by l' h' C CopperhOU8e ~Ub 18 1ng ompany to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. California CRIMINAL LAW Third Edition Cliff Roberson LL.M. Ph.D. COPPERHOUSE PUBLISHING COMPANY 1590 Lotus Road Placerville, California 95667 (916) 626-1260 Your Partner in Education with "QUALITY BOOKS AT FAIR PRICES" California CRIMINAL LAW THIRD EDITION Copyright © 1993, 1990, 1988 by Copperhouse Publishing Company Developmental Editor _ Derald Hunt All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reprinted or reproduced in any manner without prior written permission of the publisher; except for brief passages which may be quoted in connection with a book review and only when source credit is given. Library of Congress Catalog Number 88-72096 ISBN 0-942728-56-4 Paper Text Edition Printed in the United States of America. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ....................................... vii 4.6 Liability/Crime Without Intent ........... 33 Acknowledgments ................................ ix 4.7 Capacity to Commit Crime .............. 34 4.8 Mitigating Factors and Defenses .......... 36 1. LAW AND CRIME .......................... 1 4.9 Insanity .............................. 36 1.1 Purpose of Law in Society ................ 1 4.10 Capital Crimes ........................ 37 1.2 Sources of Law ........................ 1 4.11 Malice ............................... 38 1.3 Common Law and Stare Decisis ........... 3 4.12 Motive .............................. 38 1.4 Repeal/Amendment ..................... 4 4.13 Intoxication ........................... 39 1.5 Nature and Classification of Crimes ........ 4 4.14 Parties to Crime ....................... 39 1.6 Crimes Without Victims ................. 5 4.15 Attempts ............................. 40 1.7 Federal Constitutional Provisions .......... 6 4.16 Conspiracy ........................... 41 1.8 Police Power of the State ................. 7 4.17 Solicitation ........................... 42 1. 9 Doctrine of Preemption .................. 7 4.18 Persons Liable to Punishment ............ 42 1.10 Dual Federalism ........................ 7 Classroom Discussion Questions .......... 43 1.11 Legals Research .... 8 Self Study Quiz ........................ 43 1.12 Attorney General Opinions .............. 10 Classroom Discussion Questions .......... 10 5. THEFT ................................... 45 Self Study Quiz ........................ 11 5.1 Statutory Theft ........................ 45 5.2 Petty Theft ........................... 49 2. THE NATURE OF LAW ..................... 13 5.3 Grand Theft .......................... 49 2.1 Definition of Crime .................... 13 5.4 Theft: Public Funds, Embezzlement ....... 50 2.2 Purpose of Criminal Law ................ 13 5.5 Theft by Larceny ...................... 50 2.3 Construction of Penal Statutes ............ 14 5.6 Theft by False Pretense ................. 50 2.4 Conflicts Between Laws ................. 15 5.7 Theft by Trick or Device ................ 51 2.5 Criminal and Civil Liability ............. 17 5.8 Theft by Credit Card .. '.' ............... 52 2.6 Doctrine of Judicial Review .............. 17 5.9 Defrauding Hotels ..................... 52 2.7 Jurisdiction and Venue .................. 18 5.10 Theft of Utility Services ................ 52 Classroom Discussion Questions .......... 20 5.11 Theft by Embezzlement ................. 52 Self Study Quiz . ....................... 20 5.12 Theft of Lost Property .................. 53 5.13 Vehicle Theft ......................... 53 3. CLASSIFICATION OF CRIMES ............. 21 5.14 Diversion of Funds . 54 3.1 Felonies, Misdemeanors, Infractions ....... 21 5.15 Trade Secrets ......................... 54 3.2 Punishments .......................... 22 5.16 Receiving Stolen Property ............... 54 3.3 Prior Convictions ...................... 24 5.17 Goods Stolen in Another State ............ 55 3.4 Lessor and Included Offenses ............ 24 5.18 Single or Multiple Thefts ................ 55 3.5 Double Jeopardy ...................... 24 5.19 Serial Number Alteration ................ 56 3.6 Statute of Limitations ................... 27 Classroom Discussion Questions .......... 56 Classroom Discussion Questions .......... 29 Self Study Quiz . ....................... 56 Self Study Quiz ........................ 29 6. BURGLARy ............................... 59 4. CORPUS DELICTI AND CAPACITY ......... 31 6.1 Burglary ............................. 59 4.1 Role of Corpus Delicti .................. 31 6.2 Degrees of Burglary .................... 62 4.2 Act and Intent ......................... 31 6.3 Punishment ........................... 63 4.3 Intent ............................... 32 6.4 Burglary by TorchlExplosive ............. 63 4.4 Criminal Negligence ................... 33 6.5 Unlawful Entry ....................... 64 4.5 Proximate Cause ...................... 33 6.6 Possession Burglary Tools ............... 64 Tllble of Contents 6.7 Sale Burglary Tools .................... 64 9.13 Non-criminal Homicides ................ 90 6.8 Vending Machine Theft ................. 65 9.14 Justifiable Homicide .................... 90 6.9 Related Crimes ........................ 65 9.15 Home Protection . 91 Classroom Discussion Questions .......... 65 9.16 Self Defense .......................... 91 Self Study Quiz ........................ 65 Classroom Discussion Questions .......... 92 Self Study Quiz ........................ 92 7. ARSON - VANDALISM - DISORDERLY CONDUCT ................................ 67 10. RAPE AND OTHER SEX CRIMES ........... 93 7.1 Arsoll ............................... 67 10.1 Rape ................................ 93 7.2 Unlawfully Causing Fire ................ 69 10.2 Sexual Penetration ..................... 94 7.3 Possession explosives ................... 69 10.3 Consent .............................. 94 7.4 Attempted Arson ...................... 70 10.4 Rape by Force or Fear .................. 94 7.5 Psychiatric Examination ................ 70 10.5 Gang Rape ........... , ............... 95 7.6 Notice of Arsonist's Release .............. 70 10.6 Unconscious Victim .................... 95 7.7 Vandalism ............................ 70 10.7 Consent Obtained by Fraud .............. 95 7.8 Disorderly Conduct .................... 71 10.8 Statutory Rape ........................ 95 7.9 Trespassing ........................... 71 10.9 Spousal Rape ......................... 96 7.10 Unlawful Assembly .................... 71 10.10 Incest ............................... 96 7.11 Rout and Riot ......................... 71 10.11 Penetration by Foreign Object ............ 97 7.12 Public Nuisance ....................... 72 10.12 Sex by False Representation .............. 97 7.13 Disturbing the Peace ................... 72 10.13 Lewd or Dissolute Conduct .............. 98 Classroom Discussion Questions .......... 72 10.14 Indecent Exposure ..................... 98 Self Study Quiz . ....................... 72 10.15 Oral Copulation ....................... 99 10.16 Sodomy ............................. 99 8. ASSAULT - BATTERY - DEADLY WEAPONS 10 .17 Sexual Battery ....................... 100 LAW ..................................... 75 10.18 Sexually Assaulting Animals ............ 100 8.1 Assault & Battery Defined ............... 75 10.19 Sex Offender Registration .............. 100 8.2 Assault Elements ...................... 75 Classroom Discussion Questions ......... 100 8.3 Battery Elements ...................... 76 Self Study Quiz . 100 8.4 Assault & Battery Discussion ............ 76 8.5 Attempted Assault ..................... 77 8.6 Simple & Felonious Assault .............. 77 11. ROBBERY AND EXTORTION .............. 103 8.7 Motor Vehicle Assaults ................. 77 11.1 Robbery ............................ 103 8.8 Assault With Deadly Weapon ............ 77 11.2 Immediate Presence-Possession .......... 104 8.9 Assault to Rape, Etc .................... 78 11. 3 Force or Fear ........................ 104 8.10 Mayhem ............................. 78 11.4 Asportation .......................... 105 8.11 Spouse-Cohabitant Battery ............... 79 11.5 Intent to Steal ........................ 105 8.12 Child-Spouse-Parent Abuse ...... , ....... 79 11.6 Completed Robbery ................... 106 8.13 Dangerous Weapons Control Law ......... 80 11.7 Extortion ........................... 106 Classroom Discussion Questions .......... 82 11.8 Simulating Court Process ............... 108 Self Study Quiz ........................ 82 Classroom Discussion Questions ......... 108 Self Study Quiz ....................... 108 9. HOMICIDE ............................... 85 9.1 Homicide Defined ..................... 85 12. KIDNAPPING - FALSE IMPRISONMENT - 9.2 Criminal Homicides .................... 85 ARREST LAWS ........................... 109 9.3 Murder .............................. 86 12.1 Kidnapping .......................... 109 9.4 Felony-Murder Rule .................... 87 12.2 False
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INVESTIGATIVE REPORT Lori Torres, Inspector General
    INVESTIGATIVE REPORT Lori Torres, Inspector General OFFICE: INDIANA BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES TITLE: FORGERY; PERJURY; THEFT CASE ID: 2017-12-0293 DATE: August 30, 2018 Inspector General Staff Attorney Kelly Elliott, after an investigation by Special Agent Mark Mitchell, reports as follows: The Indiana General Assembly charged the Office of Inspector General (OIG) with addressing fraud, waste, abuse, and wrongdoing in the executive branch of state government. IC 4-2-7-2(b). The OIG also investigates criminal activity and ethics violations by state workers. IC 4-2-7-3. The OIG may recommend policies and carry out other activities designed to deter, detect, and eradicate fraud, waste, abuse, mismanagement, and misconduct in state government. IC 4-2- 7-3(2). On March 23, 2017, the OIG received a complaint from the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV) that alleged a former BMV employee, Richard Pringle, submitted false information to the BMV on personal certificate of title applications. OIG Special Agent Mark Mitchell conducted an investigation into this matter. Through the course of his investigation, Special Agent Mitchell interviewed Pringle and reviewed documentation received from BMV, including their internal investigation report on this matter. According to BMV’s investigative report of the allegations against Pringle, BMV found that Pringle submitted an application for a 1997 GMC Yukon in October 2016 that listed a sale price 1 that was different from the price the seller of the vehicle stated they sold it. At the conclusion of their investigation, BMV terminated Pringle’s employment in or around March 2017. Special Agent Mitchell reviewed the BMV certificate of title application for the 1997 GMC Yukon.
    [Show full text]
  • Substantive Criminal Law: Principles and Working 1 Vocabulary
    55256_CH01_001_016.pdf:55256_CH01_001_016.pdf 12/18/09 1:58 PM Page 1 CHAPTER Substantive Criminal Law: Principles and Working 1 Vocabulary Key Terms Actual cause Ecclesiastical courts Positive law Actus reus Federalism Precedent Administrative law Felony Preponderance of the evidence Attendant circumstances General intent Procedural law Beyond a reasonable doubt Gross misdemeanor Property crime Burden of proof Injunctive relief Proximate cause But-for test Intervening cause Punitive damage Canon law Jurisdiction Recklessness Capital felony Kings courts Republic Case law Law courts Social contract theory Civil law Least restrictive mechanism Specific intent Code of Hammurabi Legal cause Stare decisis Common law Lesser included offense Statutory law Compensatory damage Mala in se Strict liability Constitutional law Mala prohibita Substantial factor test Constructive intent Mens rea Substantive law Corpus delicti Misdemeanor Tort Courts of equity Misprision of felony Tortfeasor Crime Natural law Transferred intent Criminal law Negligence Uniform Crime Reports Culpable Nulla poena sine lege Violation Declaratory relief Ordinance Violent crime Democracy Ordinary misdemeanor Wobblers Deviance Petty misdemeanor Introduction This chapter explores and describes the founda- tions of American criminal law. While progressing From the genesis of time, human beings have sought through its content, readers are informed of the to establish guidelines to govern human behavior. In extent to which serious crime occurs in America. ancient civilizations, rules were derived from morals, Readers will also develop an appreciation for the customs, and norms existing within society. Thus, in Republic form of government used in this nation most societies, modern laws evolved from a loose and how social contract theory guides the construc- set of guidelines into a formal system of written tion of criminal law.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 of 26 DOCUMENTS DEERING's CALIFORNIA CODES ANNOTATED
    Page 1 1 of 26 DOCUMENTS DEERING'S CALIFORNIA CODES ANNOTATED Copyright (c) 2010 by Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. a member of the LexisNexis Group. All rights reserved. *** THIS DOCUMENT IS CURRENT THROUGH 2009-2010 EXTRAORDINARY SESSIONS 1-5, *** 7, AND 8, AND URGENCY LEGISLATION THROUGH CH 713 OF THE 2010 REGULAR SESSION EVIDENCE CODE Division 10. Hearsay Evidence Chapter 2. Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule Article 3. Prior Statements of Witnesses GO TO CALIFORNIA CODES ARCHIVE DIRECTORY Cal Evid Code § 1236 (2010) § 1236. Prior consistent statement Evidence of a statement previously made by a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement is consistent with his testimony at the hearing and is offered in compliance with Section 791. HISTORY: Enacted Stats 1965 ch 299 § 2, operative January 1, 1967. NOTES: Law Revision Commission Comments: 1965 Under existing law, a prior statement of a witness that is consistent with his testimony at the trial is admissible under certain conditions when the credibility of the witness has been attacked. The statement is admitted, however, only to rehabilitate the witness--to support his credibility--and not as evidence of the truth of the matter stated. People v. Kynette, 15 Cal.2d 731, 753-754, 104 P.2d 794, 805-806 (1940) (overruled on other grounds in People v. Snyder, 50 Cal.2d 190, 197, 324 P.2d 1, 6 (1958)). Section 1236, however, permits a prior consistent statement of a witness to be used as substantive evidence if the statement is otherwise admissible under the rules relating to the rehabilitation of impeached witnesses.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rationale of Criminal Negligence Roy Mitchell Moreland University of Kentucky
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 32 | Issue 2 Article 2 1944 A Rationale of Criminal Negligence Roy Mitchell Moreland University of Kentucky Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Torts Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Moreland, Roy Mitchell (1944) "A Rationale of Criminal Negligence," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 32 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol32/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A RATIONALE OF CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE (Continued from November issue) RoY MOREL A D* 2. METHODS Op DESCRIBING THE NEGLIGENCE REQUIRED 'FOR CRIMINAL LIABILITY The proposed formula for criminal negligence describes the higher degree of negligence required for criminal liability as "conduct creating such an unreasonable risk to life, safety, property, or other interest for the unintentional invasion of which the law prescribes punishment, as to be recklessly disre- gardful of such interest." This formula, like all such machinery, is, of necessity, ab- stractly stated so as to apply to a multitude of cases. As in the case of all abstractions, it is difficult to understand without explanation and illumination. What devices can be used to make it intelligible to judges and juries in individual cases q a.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes Act 2016
    REPUBLIC OF NAURU Crimes Act 2016 ______________________________ Act No. 18 of 2016 ______________________________ TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 – PRELIMINARY ....................................................................................................... 1 1 Short title .................................................................................................... 1 2 Commencement ......................................................................................... 1 3 Application ................................................................................................. 1 4 Codification ................................................................................................ 1 5 Standard geographical jurisdiction ............................................................. 2 6 Extraterritorial jurisdiction—ship or aircraft outside Nauru ......................... 2 7 Extraterritorial jurisdiction—transnational crime ......................................... 4 PART 2 – INTERPRETATION ................................................................................................ 6 8 Definitions .................................................................................................. 6 9 Definition of consent ................................................................................ 13 PART 3 – PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY ................................................. 14 DIVISION 3.1 – PURPOSE AND APPLICATION ................................................................. 14 10 Purpose
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Delicti
    CORPUS DELICTI Jessica Smith, UNC School of Government (Nov. 2011). Contents I. Generally .........................................................................................................................1 II. Corpus Delicti and Extrajudicial Confessions ...................................................................1 A. Failure to Satisfy the Rule Results in Insufficient Evidence ....................................1 B. Rule Applies to Both Confessions and Admissions ................................................1 III. “Substantial Independent Corroborative Evidence.” .........................................................2 A. Capital Cases ........................................................................................................2 B. Strong Corroboration .............................................................................................2 IV. Illustrative Cases .............................................................................................................2 A. Cases in Which the Evidence Was Insufficient .......................................................2 B. Cases in Which the Evidence Was Sufficient .........................................................3 I. Generally. The term “corpus delicti” (sometimes spelled corpus delecti) means the “body of the crime.” BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 395 (9th ed. 2009); State v. Smith, 362 N.C. 583, 589 (2008). It refers to the substance of the crime, which ordinarily includes two elements: the act and the criminal agency of the act. BLACK’S at
    [Show full text]
  • Gangs Beyond Borders
    Gangs Beyond Borders California and the Fight Against Transnational Organized Crime March 2014 Kamala D. Harris California Attorney General Gangs Beyond Borders California and the Fight Against Transnational Organized Crime March 2014 Kamala D. Harris California Attorney General Message from the Attorney General California is a leader for international commerce. In close proximity to Latin America and Canada, we are a state laced with large ports and a vast interstate system. California is also leading the way in economic development and job creation. And the Golden State is home to the digital and innovation economies reshaping how the world does business. But these same features that benefit California also make the state a coveted place of operation for transnational criminal organizations. As an international hub, more narcotics, weapons and humans are trafficked in and out of California than any other state. The size and strength of California’s economy make our businesses, financial institutions and communities lucrative targets for transnational criminal activity. Finally, transnational criminal organizations are relying increasingly on cybercrime as a source of funds – which means they are frequently targeting, and illicitly using, the digital tools and content developed in our state. The term “transnational organized crime” refers to a range of criminal activity perpetrated by groups whose origins often lie outside of the United States but whose operations cross international borders. Whether it is a drug cartel originating from Mexico or a cybercrime group out of Eastern Europe, the operations of transnational criminal organizations threaten the safety, health and economic wellbeing of all Americans, and particularly Californians.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court 7 Eastern District of California 8
    Case 1:10-cv-01050-AWI -SMS Document 4 Filed 06/18/10 Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MICHAEL TATER-ALEXANDER, CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01050-AWI-SMS 10 Plaintiff, 11 SCREENING ORDER v. 12 COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., 13 14 Defendants. (Doc. 2) / 15 16 Screening Order 17 Plaintiff Michael Tater-Alexander challenges the constitutionality of California Vehicle 18 Code § 4760, which requires the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to refuse to 19 20 renew a vehicle’s registration if the owner or lessee has been mailed a notice of a delinquent 21 parking violation. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed his complaint on June 22 10, 2010. He seeks damages and equitable relief. This matter has been referred to the magistrate 23 judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304. 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 -1- Case 1:10-cv-01050-AWI -SMS Document 4 Filed 06/18/10 Page 2 of 20 1 I. Screening Requirement 2 A court has inherent power to control its docket and the disposition of its cases with 3 economy of time and effort for both the court and the parties. Landis v. North American Co., 299 4 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 5 6 U.S. 915 (1992). In cases in which the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court must 7 screen the complaint and must dismiss it at any time if it concludes that the action or appeal is 8 frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary 9 relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime and Delinquency in California 2000
    CCC RRR III MMM EEE &&& DD EE LL II NN QQ UU EE NN CC YY I N C A L I F O R N I A 2000 California Department of Justice Bill Lockyer, Attorney General Division of Criminal Justice Information Services CJSC Home Page CJSC Publications AG’s Home Page CRIMECRIME && DELINQUENCYDELINQUENCY ININ CALIFORNIACALIFORNIA 20002000 Bill Lockyer, Attorney General California Department of Justice Division of Criminal Justice Information Services Bureau of Criminal Information and Analysis CRIME & DELINQUENCY IN CALIFORNIA 2000 CRIMES ARRESTS DISPOSITIONS ADULT CORRECTIONS EXPENDITURES & PERSONNEL OTHER DATA BASES DATA TABLES APPENDIX DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SERVICES Nick Dedier, Director BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS Doug Smith, Chief Mike Acosta, Assistant Chief CRIMINAL JUSTICE STATISTICS CENTER Steve Galeria, Program Manager Leonard A. Marowitz, Research Manager CRIME AND DELINQUENCY IN CALIFORNIA, 2000 Bonnie Collins, Analyst Vicki Louie, Analyst Linda Nance, Analyst Umash Prasad, Analyst Laura Towse, Analyst Rebecca Bowe, Graphics / Internet Tad Davis, Editor The role of the Criminal Justice Statistics Center is: ■ To collect, analyze, and report statistical data which provide valid measures of crime and the criminal justice process; ■ To examine these data on an ongoing basis to better describe crime and the criminal justice system; ■ To promote the responsible presentation and use of crime statistics. ii CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2000 CONTENTS ATTORNEY GENERAL’S MESSAGE .......................................... vi HIGHLIGHTS
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Code
    Criminal Code Warning: this is not an official translation. Under all circumstances the original text in Dutch language of the Criminal Code (Wetboek van Strafrecht) prevails. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the use of this translation. Criminal Code (Text valid on: 01-10-2012) Act of 3 March 1881 We WILLEM III, by the grace of God, King of the Netherlands, Prince of Orange-Nassau, Grand Duke of Luxemburg etc. etc. etc. Greetings to all who shall see or hear these presents! Be it known: Whereas We have considered that it is necessary to enact a new Criminal Code; We therefore, having heard the Council of State, and in consultation with the States General, have approved and decreed as We hereby approve and decree, to establish the following provisions which shall constitute the Criminal Code: Book One. General Provisions Part I. Scope of Application of Criminal Law Section 1 1. No act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under the law at the time of its commission shall be punishable by law. 2. Where the statutory provisions in force at the time when the criminal offence was committed are later amended, the provisions most favourable to the suspect or the defendant shall apply. Section 2 The criminal law of the Netherlands shall apply to any person who commits a criminal offence in the Netherlands. Section 3 The criminal law of the Netherlands shall apply to any person who commits a criminal offence on board a Dutch vessel or aircraft outside the territory of the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Gfniral Statutes
    GFNIRAL STATUTES OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, IN FOROE JANUARY, 1891. VOL.2. CowwNnro ALL TEE LAw OP & GENERAJ NATURE Now IN FORCE AND NOT IN VOL. 1, THE SAME BEING TEE CODE OF Civu PROCEDURE AND ALL REME- DIAL LAW, THE PROBATE CODE, THE PENAL CODE AND THE CEnt- JRAL PROCEDURE, THE CoNSTITuTIoNS AND ORGANIc ACTS. COMPILED AND ANNOTATED BY JNO. F. KELLY, OF TUE Sr. Pui BAR. SECOND EDITION. ST. PAUL: PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR 1891. A MINNESOTA STATUTES 1891 IN] EX To Vols. 1 and , except as Indicated by the cross-references, to Vol. 1. A - ACCOUNTS. (cqinued)-- officers'., of corporation, altering, §6448. ABANDONMNT (see CHILD)- presentation, of fraudulent, when felony, Qf, insane person, penalty fpr, §5895, §6507. of lands condemned for public use, §1229. ABATE- ACCOUN,T BOOKS- reognizance.not to abate, when, §439. • are p'rirna.facie evidence, §51'12. action to, nuisapee, §*442 ACCUSATION- actions abated when, §4738. to remove attorneys, §4376. board of health, sa,ll, hat,nuisapces, i9, %vriting. veiifipd, '4l77. §5SS, 589.. ACCUSED- warrant to, §591. rigMsof; §6626 ABBREViATIONS- iii describing lands, §1582. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (see Index to 'Vol. ABDUCTION (see SEDUCTION; KTDNAP- of 1eeds of land, §4121. RING)-. certifipa.te of. §4122. defined, pnnishment,f,or, §6196. ii qter.sta,tes, §4.23. evidence required to cnvitof, §6197. in foreign countries. §4124. ABETTING (see AIDIN-)- iefusaI to aknplege, §4125. ABOLISHED- proceedings to eompl, §4126. dower anl curtesy is, §4001.. defective, to, cqnveyanqes legalized-. certain defects legalized, §4164. ABORTION (see INDECENT ARTICLES)- ntnslapghter in first degree, when, by officer whose ternl. has çxpired, §4165, §6H5, GUll.
    [Show full text]
  • 61-2G-306 Renewal of License, Certification, Or Registration. (1) To
    Utah Code 61-2g-306 Renewal of license, certification, or registration. (1) To renew a license, certification, or registration, before the license, certification, or registration expires, the holder of the license, certification, or registration shall submit to the division in compliance with procedures set through the concurrence of the division and the board: (a) an application for renewal; (b) a fee established by the division and the board, in accordance with Section 63J-1-504; and (c) evidence in the form prescribed by the division of having completed the continuing education requirements for renewal specified in this chapter. (2) (a) A license, certification, or registration expires if it is not renewed on or before its expiration date. (b) For a period of 30 days after the expiration date, a license, certification, or registration may be reinstated upon: (i) payment of a renewal fee and a late fee determined through the concurrence of the division and the board; and (ii) satisfying the continuing education requirements specified in Section 61-2g-307. (c) After the 30-day period described in Subsection (2)(b), and until six months after the expiration date, a license, certification, or registration may be reinstated by: (i) paying a renewal fee and a reinstatement fee determined through the concurrence of the division and the board; and (ii) satisfying the continuing education requirements specified in Section 61-2g-307. (d) After the six-month period described in Subsection (2)(c), and until one year after the expiration date, a
    [Show full text]