DOCSLIB.ORG

Choctaw Nation Criminal Code

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Choctaw Nation Criminal Code Choctaw Nation Criminal Code Table of Contents Part I. In General ........................................................................................................................ 38 Chapter 1. Preliminary Provisions ............................................................................................ 38 Section 1. Title of code ............................................................................................................. 38 Section 2. Criminal acts are only those prescribed ................................................................... 38 Section 3. Crime and public offense defined ............................................................................ 38 Section 4. Crimes classified ...................................................................................................... 38 Section 5. Felony defined .......................................................................................................... 39 Section 6. Misdemeanor defined ............................................................................................... 39 Section 7. Objects of criminal code .......................................................................................... 39 Section 8. Conviction must precede punishment ...................................................................... 39 Section 9. Punishment of felonies ............................................................................................. 39 Section 10. Punishment of misdemeanor .................................................................................. 39 Section 11. Special provisions as governing—Acts punishable in different ways—Acts not otherwise punishable by imprisonment ..................................................................................... 40 Section 12. Reserved ................................................................................................................. 40 Section 13. Uniform reporting system to be used by criminal and juvenile justice information systems ...................................................................................................................................... 40 Section 14. Sentencing Authority............................................................................................. 41 Section 15. Sentences of imprisonment, where served ............................................................. 41 Chapter 2. General Provisions ................................................................................................... 42 Section 21. Prohibited act a misdemeanor unless otherwise stated .......................................... 42 Section 22. Gross injuries—Grossly disturbing peace—Openly outraging public decency— Injurious acts not expressly forbidden ...................................................................................... 42 Section 23. Acts punishable under foreign laws ....................................................................... 42 Section 24. Criminal acts may also be punishable as contempt of court .................................. 42 Section 25. Mitigation of punishment ....................................................................................... 42 Page 1 of 332 Section 26. Aiding in a misdemeanor ....................................................................................... 42 Section 27. Sending letter—When complete—Place of prosecution ........................................ 43 Section 28. Failure to perform duty .......................................................................................... 43 Attempts ....................................................................................................................................... 43 Section 41. Conviction for attempt not permitted where crime is perpetrated ......................... 43 Section 42. Attempts to commit crimes—Punishment ............................................................. 43 Section 43. Unsuccessful attempt—Another crime committed ................................................ 43 Section 44. Attempt defined ...................................................................................................... 44 Habitual Offenses and Punishment ........................................................................................... 44 Section 51. Offense of Habitual Criminal and Punishment ..................................................... 44 Sentence and Imprisonment ...................................................................................................... 44 Section 61. Sentences to be served in order received by penal institution—Concurrent sentences—Credit for good conduct ......................................................................................... 44 Section 62. Sentences to run concurrent with other court sentences ........................................ 45 Section 63. Imposition of fine in addition to imprisonment ..................................................... 45 Section 65. Civil rights suspended ............................................................................................ 45 Section 66. Person of convict protected .................................................................................... 45 Section 67. Conviction does not work forfeiture ...................................................................... 45 Perjury on Examination of Privileged Witness ........................................................................ 46 Section 81. Testimony—Privilege of witnesses and perjury .................................................... 46 Definitions .................................................................................................................................... 46 Section 91. Terms to have meanings specified unless different meaning appears ................... 46 Section 92. Willfully defined .................................................................................................... 46 Section 93. Negligent—Negligence .......................................................................................... 46 Section 94. Corruptly ................................................................................................................ 46 Section 95. Malice—Maliciously .............................................................................................. 46 Section 96. Knowingly .............................................................................................................. 47 Section 97. Bribe ....................................................................................................................... 47 Section 98. Vessel ..................................................................................................................... 47 Page 2 of 332 Section 99. Peace officers ......................................................................................................... 47 Section 99a. Authority of peace officers ................................................................................... 47 Section 100. Signature............................................................................................................... 48 Section 101. Writing includes printing ..................................................................................... 48 Section 102. Real property ........................................................................................................ 48 Section 103. Personal property.................................................................................................. 48 Section 104. Property defined ................................................................................................... 49 Section 105. Person defined ...................................................................................................... 49 Section 106. Person as designating party whose property may be subject of offense .............. 49 Section 107. Singular includes plural ........................................................................................ 49 Section 108. Gender .................................................................................................................. 49 Section 109. Present tense ......................................................................................................... 49 Section 110. Intent to defraud ................................................................................................... 49 Other Remedies and Punishments ............................................................................................ 49 Section 131. Civil remedies not affected .................................................................................. 50 Section 132. Reserved ............................................................................................................... 50 Section 133. Military punishment—Contempt—Apprentices, bastards, etc. ........................... 50 Fines and Penalties ...................................................................................................................... 50 Section 141. Payment of fines, fees, assessments, forfeitures and penalties into the court fund ................................................................................................................................................... 50 Crime Victims Compensation Act ............................................................................................ 50 Section
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perceptions of Powdered Alcohol and Intentions to Use: an Exploratory Qualitative Assessment of Potential Palcohol Use by Young Adults
    Beverages 2015, 1, 329-340; doi:10.3390/beverages1040329 OPEN ACCESS beverages ISSN 2306-5710 www.mdpi.com/journal/beverages Article Perceptions of Powdered Alcohol and Intentions to Use: An Exploratory Qualitative Assessment of Potential Palcohol Use by Young Adults John Stogner 1,*, Julie M. Baldwin 2, Timothy Brown 3 and Taylor Chick 1 1 Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University Boulevard., Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Missouri State University, 901 S. National Strong Hall Room. 226, Springfield, MO 65897, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Criminal Justice, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Ross Hall 5th Floor, Little Rock, AR 72204, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-704-687-8446; Fax: +1-704-687-5285. Academic Editor: Edgar Chambers IV Received: 14 October 2015 / Accepted: 17 November 2015 / Published: 1 December 2015 Abstract: While there seems to be growing media intrigue over atypical forms of alcohol use, the utilization of the majority of novel consumption methods (e.g., eyeballing, slimming, alcohol without liquid (AWOL)) seems minimal. In 2014, however, several outlets suggested that powdered alcohol would soon surface as a threat to public safety. The impetus of these fears was the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau’s approval for Lipsmark LLC to package a powdered alcohol product named “Palcohol”. Palcohol has yet to reach store shelves, but public outcry has been intense.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes Act 2016
    REPUBLIC OF NAURU Crimes Act 2016 ______________________________ Act No. 18 of 2016 ______________________________ TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 – PRELIMINARY ....................................................................................................... 1 1 Short title .................................................................................................... 1 2 Commencement ......................................................................................... 1 3 Application ................................................................................................. 1 4 Codification ................................................................................................ 1 5 Standard geographical jurisdiction ............................................................. 2 6 Extraterritorial jurisdiction—ship or aircraft outside Nauru ......................... 2 7 Extraterritorial jurisdiction—transnational crime ......................................... 4 PART 2 – INTERPRETATION ................................................................................................ 6 8 Definitions .................................................................................................. 6 9 Definition of consent ................................................................................ 13 PART 3 – PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY ................................................. 14 DIVISION 3.1 – PURPOSE AND APPLICATION ................................................................. 14 10 Purpose
    [Show full text]
  • Methanol Interim AEGL Document
    INTERIM 1: 1/2003 INTERIM 2: 2/2005 INTERIM ACUTE EXPOSURE GUIDELINE LEVELS (AEGLs) METHANOL (CAS Reg. No. 67-56-1) For NAS/COT Subcommittee for AEGLs February 2005 METHANOL Interim 2: 2/2005 PREFACE Under the authority of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) P. L. 92-463 of 1972, the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances (NAC/AEGL Committee) has been established to identify, review and interpret relevant toxicologic and other scientific data and develop AEGLs for high priority, acutely toxic chemicals. AEGLs represent threshold exposure limits for the general public and are applicable to emergency exposure periods ranging from 10 minutes to 8 hours. AEGL-2 and AEGL-3 levels, and AEGL-1 levels as appropriate, will be developed for each of five exposure periods (10 and 30 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours, and 8 hours) and will be distinguished by varying degrees of severity of toxic effects. It is believed that the recommended exposure levels are applicable to the general population including infants and children, and other individuals who may be sensitive or susceptible. The three AEGLs have been defined as follows: AEGL-1 is the airborne concentration (expressed as ppm or mg/m;) of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience notable discomfort, irritation, or certain asymptomatic, non-sensory effects. However, the effects are not disabling and are transient and reversible upon cessation of exposure. AEGL-2 is the airborne concentration (expressed as ppm or mg/m;) of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience irreversible or other serious, long-lasting adverse health effects, or an impaired ability to escape.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Radical” Notion of the Presumption of Innocence
    EXECUTIVE SESSION ON THE FUTURE OF JUSTICE POLICY THE “RADICAL” MAY 2020 Tracey Meares, NOTION OF THE Justice Collaboratory, Yale University Arthur Rizer, PRESUMPTION R Street Institute OF INNOCENCE The Square One Project aims to incubate new thinking on our response to crime, promote more effective strategies, and contribute to a new narrative of justice in America. Learn more about the Square One Project at squareonejustice.org The Executive Session was created with support from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation as part of the Safety and Justice Challenge, which seeks to reduce over-incarceration by changing the way America thinks about and uses jails. 04 08 14 INTRODUCTION THE CURRENT STATE OF WHY DOES THE PRETRIAL DETENTION PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE MATTER? 18 24 29 THE IMPACT OF WHEN IS PRETRIAL WHERE DO WE GO FROM PRETRIAL DETENTION DETENTION HERE? ALTERNATIVES APPROPRIATE? TO AND SAFEGUARDS AROUND PRETRIAL DETENTION 33 35 37 CONCLUSION ENDNOTES REFERENCES 41 41 42 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AUTHOR NOTE MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION ON THE FUTURE OF JUSTICE POLICY 04 THE ‘RADICAL’ NOTION OF THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE “It was the smell of [] death, it was the death of a person’s hope, it was the death of a person’s ability to live the American dream.” That is how Dr. Nneka Jones Tapia described the Cook County Jail where she served as the institution’s warden (from May 2015 to March 2018). This is where we must begin. EXECUTIVE SESSION ON THE FUTURE OF JUSTICE POLICY 05 THE ‘RADICAL’ NOTION OF THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE Any discussion of pretrial detention must Let’s not forget that Kalief Browder spent acknowledge that we subject citizens— three years of his life in Rikers, held on presumed innocent of the crimes with probable cause that he had stolen a backpack which they are charged—to something containing money, a credit card, and an iPod that resembles death.
    [Show full text]
  • State Public Nuisance Claims and Climate Change Adaptation
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Environmental Law Review Volume 36 Issue 1 Fall 2018 Article 2 September 2018 State Public Nuisance Claims and Climate Change Adaptation Albert C. Lin University of California, Davis, School of Law Michael Burger Sabin Center for Climate Change Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons, Torts Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation Albert C. Lin and Michael Burger, State Public Nuisance Claims and Climate Change Adaptation, 36 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 49 (2018) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr/vol36/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Environmental Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE State Public Nuisance Claims and Climate Change Adaptation ALBERT C. LIN* & MICHAEL BURGER** TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ........................................................................... 50 II. Background ............................................................................ 51 A. The California Lawsuits ................................................. 51 B. Common Law Litigation on Climate Change ............... 54 III. Preliminary
    [Show full text]
  • How California's Expansive Public Nuisance Doctrine May Result in an Unprecedented Judgment Against the Lead Paint Industry in the Case of County of Santa Clara V
    Roger Williams University Law Review Volume 15 | Issue 2 Article 7 Summer 2010 Venturing into the "Impenetrable Jungle": How California's Expansive Public Nuisance Doctrine May Result in an Unprecedented Judgment Against the Lead Paint Industry in the Case of County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield ompC any Matthew R. Watson Roger Williams University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR Recommended Citation Watson, Matthew R. (2010) "Venturing into the "Impenetrable Jungle": How California's Expansive Public Nuisance Doctrine May Result in an Unprecedented Judgment Against the Lead Paint Industry in the Case of County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Company," Roger Williams University Law Review: Vol. 15: Iss. 2, Article 7. Available at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR/vol15/iss2/7 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Roger Williams University Law Review by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Venturing into the "Impenetrable Jungle": How California's Expansive Public Nuisance Doctrine May Result in an Unprecedented Judgment Against the Lead Paint Industry in the case of County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Company Matthew R. Watson* The Legislature hereby finds and declares that childhood lead exposure represents the most significant childhood environmental health problem in the state today; that too little is known about the prevalence, long-term health care costs, severity, and location of these problems in California; that it is well known that the environment is widely contaminated with lead .
    [Show full text]
  • Real Offense Sentencing: the Model Sentencing and Corrections Act
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 72 Article 19 Issue 4 Winter Winter 1981 Real Offense Sentencing: The oM del Sentencing and Corrections Act Michael H. Tonry Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Michael H. Tonry, Real Offense Sentencing: The odeM l Sentencing and Corrections Act, 72 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1550 (1981) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/81/7204-1550 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 72, No. 4 Copyright © 1981 by Northwestern University School of Law Wzntedin US.A. REAL OFFENSE SENTENCING: THE MODEL SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS ACT MICHAEL H. TONRY* The Uniform Law Commissioners recently adopted a Model Sen- tencing and Corrections Act.' It provides for the creation of a sentenc- ing commission that would promulgate guidelines for sentencing. In the ordinary case, the judge would be expected to impose the sentence indi- cated by the applicable guideline. Defendants would be entitled to ap- peal the sentence imposed. To forestall or frustrate prosecutorial manipulation of the guidelines by means of charge dismissals and plea bargains, the Model Act separates sanctions from the substantive crimi- nal law by directing the probation officer, the judge, and any appellate court to base sentencing considerations not on the offense of conviction but on the defendant's "actual offense behavior." In this respect, and in several others, the Model Sentencing Act is a perplexing document.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Code
    Criminal Code Warning: this is not an official translation. Under all circumstances the original text in Dutch language of the Criminal Code (Wetboek van Strafrecht) prevails. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the use of this translation. Criminal Code (Text valid on: 01-10-2012) Act of 3 March 1881 We WILLEM III, by the grace of God, King of the Netherlands, Prince of Orange-Nassau, Grand Duke of Luxemburg etc. etc. etc. Greetings to all who shall see or hear these presents! Be it known: Whereas We have considered that it is necessary to enact a new Criminal Code; We therefore, having heard the Council of State, and in consultation with the States General, have approved and decreed as We hereby approve and decree, to establish the following provisions which shall constitute the Criminal Code: Book One. General Provisions Part I. Scope of Application of Criminal Law Section 1 1. No act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under the law at the time of its commission shall be punishable by law. 2. Where the statutory provisions in force at the time when the criminal offence was committed are later amended, the provisions most favourable to the suspect or the defendant shall apply. Section 2 The criminal law of the Netherlands shall apply to any person who commits a criminal offence in the Netherlands. Section 3 The criminal law of the Netherlands shall apply to any person who commits a criminal offence on board a Dutch vessel or aircraft outside the territory of the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • 7-Noam Lauren
    dGE IJ.S. POST RINEY BOWES 4ý1 ZIP 90067 t 02 t 4iY ta -- -- - -- - _ _- -- -- 09 0000361217OCT 2020 a r na ft Manatt Phelps Phillips LLP 2049 Century Park East Suite 1700 I I CA manatt phelps phillips Los Angeles 90067-3101 NO. Sender Tile 66642-060 To Rutan Tucker LLP In Jeffrey T. Melchina I 7-NoamDuman E Lauren Palley 1/ 611 Anton Boulevard Suite 1400 Costa Mesa CA 92626-1931 I I 1 MANATT PHELPS PHILLIPS LLP CRAIG A. MOYER Bar No. CA 094187 2 E-mail [email protected] VIRAL MEHTA Bar No. CA 261852 3 E-mail [email protected] 2049 Century Park East Suite 1700 4 Los Angeles California 90067 Telephone 310.312.4000 5 Facsimile 310.312.4224 6 MANATT PHELPS PHILLIPS LLP MATTHEW WILLIAMSON Bar No. CA 247627 7 [email protected] 695 Town Center Drive 14th Floor 8 Costa Mesa CA 92626-1924 Telephone 714 371-2500 9 Facsimile 714 371-2550 10 Attorneys for Defendant ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 11 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE-CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER 14 15 CITY OF IRVINE Case No. 30-2020-01153015-CU-MC-CJC 16 Plaintiff Hon. Gregory H. Lewis Dept. C26 17 v. DEFENDANT ALL AMERICAN ASPHALTS VERIFIED ANSWER TO 18 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT and DOES 1-10 PLAINTIFF CITY OF IRVINES inclusive COMPLAINT FOR PUBLIC 19 NUISANCE ABATEMENT Defendants. INJUNCTION EQUITABLE RELIEF 20 AND CIVIL PENALTIES 21 Complaint Filed July 28 2020 Trial Date None Set 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 326974864.1 MANATL PHELPS PHILLIPS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW COSTA MISA DEFENDANTS VERIFIED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF CITY OF IRVINE 1 ANSWER 2 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections 431.30 and 446 Defendant All 3 American Asphalt AAA hereby submits its verified answer to Plaintiff the City of Irvines 4 Plaintiff or City Complaint for Public Nuisance Abatement Injunction Equitable Relief 5 and Civil Penalties Complaint as follows 6 INTRODUCTION 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF NOTES June 13, 2019 Colonel Eliot K
    C i n c i n n a t i P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t STAFF NOTES June 13, 2019 Colonel Eliot K. Isaac, Police Chief Planning Section • Revision to Procedure 12.010 Roll Call and Personnel Inspection • Revisions to Procedure 12.020, Uniforms, Related Equipment, and Personal Grooming; Procedure 12.025, Authorized Weapons; Procedure 12.815, Court Appearances, Jury Duty, and Other Hearings; and Procedure 19.140, Outside Employment • Revision to Procedure 12.110, Handling Suspected Mentally Ill Individuals and Potential Suicides • Revision to Procedure 12.275, Removal of Abandoned Junk Motor Vehicles and Overtime Parked Vehicles • Revision to Procedure 12.545, Use of Force Emergency Communications Center Liaison • Reminder to Adhere to Procedure 12.270, Impounding, Moving, and Release of Vehicles, for Dispatches to Abandoned Vehicles on Private Property Chief’s Office • S.T.A.R.S. Data • Police Chief’s Commendations for the Week • Patrol Bureau Commander’s Commendations • Thank You Letters Colonel Eliot K. Isaac, Police Chief June 13, 2019 1. REVISION TO PROCEDURE 12.010, ROLL CALL AND PERSONNEL INSPECTION Procedure 12.010, Roll Call and Personnel Inspection has been revised. The Department began the transition to the Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 pistol beginning in June, 2019. The M&P 2.0 is not equipped with a magazine safety disconnect, which will adversely affect the safety of Department members during the current iteration of roll call. A review of best practices, with the intent of keeping the safety of Department members and citizens the top priority, has resulted in the following changes to the conduction of roll calls: • Removed the command “Raise Pistols.” o Officers will continue to remove the magazine from the firearm, as well as the extra magazines from the magazine pouch, to be inspected.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Mental Illness and the Criminal Justice System
    A GUIDE TO MENTAL ILLNESS AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM A SYSTEMS GUIDE FOR FAMILIES AND CONSUMERS National Alliance on Mental Illness Department of Policy and Legal Affairs 2107 Wilson Blvd., Suite 300 Arlington, VA 22201 Helpline: 800-950-NAMI NAMI – Guide to Mental Illness and the Criminal Justice System FOREWORD Tragically, jails and prisons are emerging as the "psychiatric hospitals" of the 1990s. A sample of 1400 NAMI families surveyed in 1991 revealed that 40 percent of family members with severe mental illness had been arrested one or more times. Other national studies reveal that approximately 8 percent of all jail and prison inmates suffer from severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorders. These statistics are a direct reflection of the failure of public mental health systems to provide appropriate care and treatment to individuals with severe mental illnesses. These horrifying statistics point directly to the need of NAMI families and consumers to develop greater familiarity with the workings of their local criminal justice systems. Key personnel in these systems, such as police officers, prosecutors, public defenders and jail employees may have limited knowledge about severe mental illness and the needs of those who suffer from these illnesses. Moreover, the procedures, terminology and practices which characterize the criminal justice system are likely to be bewildering for consumers and family members alike. This guide is intended to serve as an aid for those people thrust into interaction with local criminal justice systems. Since criminal procedures are complicated and often differ from state to state, readers are urged to consult the laws and procedures of their states and localities.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall Islands Consolidated Legislation
    Criminal Code [31 MIRC Ch 1] http://www.paclii.org/mh/legis/consol_act/cc94/ Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback Marshall Islands Consolidated Legislation You are here: PacLII >> Databases >> Marshall Islands Consolidated Legislation >> Criminal Code [31 MIRC Ch 1] Database Search | Name Search | Noteup | Download | Help Criminal Code [31 MIRC Ch 1] 31 MIRC Ch 1 MARSHALL ISLANDS REVISED CODE 2004 TITLE 31. - CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS CHAPTER 1. CRIMINAL CODE ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section PART I - GENERAL PROVISIONS §101 . Short title. §102 . Classification of crimes. §103. Definitions, Burden of Proof; General principles of liability; Requirements of culpability. §104 . Accessories. §105 . Attempts. §106 . Insanity. §107 . Presumption as to responsibility of children. §108 . Limitation of prosecution. §109. Limitation of punishment for crimes in violation of native customs. PART II - ABUSE OF PROCESS §110 . Interference with service of process. §111 .Concealment, removal or alteration of record or process. PART III - ARSON §112 . Defined; punishment. PART IV - ASSAULT AND BATTERY §113 . Assault. §114 . Aggravated assault. §115 . Assault and battery. §116 . Assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. 1 of 37 25/08/2011 14:51 Criminal Code [31 MIRC Ch 1] http://www.paclii.org/mh/legis/consol_act/cc94/ PART V - BIGAMY §117 . Defined; punishment. PART VI - BRIBERY §118 . Defined; punishment. PART VII - BURGLARY §119. Defined; punishment. PART VIII - CONSPIRACY §120 . Defined, punishment. PART IX – COUNTERFEITING §121 . Defined; punishment. PART X - DISTURBANCES, RIOTS, AND OTHER CRIMES AGAINST THE PEACE §122 . Disturbing the peace. §123 . Riot. §124. Drunken and disorderly conduct. §125 . Affray. §126 . Security to keep the peace. PART XI - ESCAPE AND RESCUE §127. Escape.
    [Show full text]