DOCSLIB.ORG

Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Llc Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Llc Atlantic Coast Pipeline ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE INDIVIDUAL 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Prepared by August 2016 ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE PROJECT WEST VIRGINIA – INDIVIDUAL 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 OVERVIEW AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 1 2.0 TYPE OF OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 ACTIVITY PROPOSED IN STREAMS (WATERBODIES) OR WETLANDS..................... 3 3.1 WATERBODIES ................................................................................................................. 3 3.2 WETLANDS ........................................................................................................................ 8 4.0 PROJECT PURPOSE ................................................................................................................... 9 5.0 PROJECT LOCATION .............................................................................................................. 10 5.1 COUNTY ........................................................................................................................... 10 5.2 NEAREST TOWN ............................................................................................................. 11 5.3 COORDINATES ................................................................................................................ 11 5.4 DIRECTIONS TO SITE ..................................................................................................... 11 6.0 WATERSHED NAME AND SIZE ............................................................................................. 12 7.0 NAME OF STREAM(S) WHERE WORK WILL OCCUR AND RECEIVING STREAMS TO WHICH THEY DRAIN ...................................................................................................... 12 8.0 LENGTH AND WIDTH OF SECTION 10 IMPACTS ............................................................ 34 9.0 WETLANDS ON PROJECT SITE/ IMPACTED WETLANDS ............................................ 34 10.0 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WETLAND FUNCTIONS .......................................................... 46 11.0 TYPE, COMPOSITION, AND QUANTITY OF FILL MATERIAL ..................................... 48 12.0 NO PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE DEMONSTRATION ..................................................... 49 12.1 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE.......................................................................................... 49 12.2 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES ............................................................................ 49 12.3 ENERGY CONSERVATION ............................................................................................ 49 12.4 SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................. 50 12.5 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION ............................................................................. 50 13.0 WETLANDS DELINEATION ................................................................................................... 52 14.0 STREAM RESTORATION PLAN ............................................................................................ 52 15.0 MITIGATION/COMPENSATION AGREEMENT ................................................................ 53 16.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 54 Atlantic Coast Pipeline i Individual 401 Water Quality Certification West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Proposed Pipeline Facilities for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline ............................................ 10 Table 2 U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in West Virginia ........................................................................................ 11 Table 3 Watersheds Crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in West Virginia .............................. 12 Table 4-1 Waterbodies Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline – West Virginia. Pipeline Construction Impacts. ......................................................................... 13 Table 4-2 Waterbodies Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline – West Virginia. Access Road Impacts. ....................................................................................... 22 Table 5 Navigable Waterbodies Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline ............................................................................................................................. 34 Table 6 Wetlands Crossed and Crossing Methods for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline – West Virginia ............................................................................................................................. 35 Table 7 Summary of Wetland Functional Types Impacted by of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in West Virginia ................................................................................................................ 47 Table 8 Select Route Adjustments Incorporated into the Proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline Route in West Virginia ..................................................................................................... 52 APPENDICES Appendix A Figures Appendix B Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report Appendix C West Fork and Greenbrier Rivers, Site Specific Drawings (Section 10 Navigable Water) Appendix D Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC Plan) Appendix E Restoration and Rehabilitation Plan Appendix F Typical Construction Design Drawings Appendix G Compressor Station 1 Grading Design Plan Atlantic Coast Pipeline ii Individual 401 Water Quality Certification West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACP Atlantic Coast Pipeline Atlantic Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC ATWS additional temporary workspace CFR Code of Federal Regulations Columbia Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Dominion Dominion Resources, Inc. DTI Dominion Transmission, Inc. EIA U.S. Energy Information Administration FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission GIS geographic information system HUC hydrologic unit codes LDC local distribution companies M&R metering and regulating MMDth/d million dekatherms per day MP milepost NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NWI National Wetlands Inventory PEM palustrine emergent wetland PFO palustrine forested wetland Plan Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan Procedures Wetland and Waterbody Construction and Mitigation Procedures Project Atlantic Coast Pipeline PSS palustrine scrub-shrub wetland SHP Supply Header Project SPCC Plan Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Plan SSURGO Soil Survey Geographic Database Transco Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC UNT Unnamed Tributary USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USFS U.S. Forest Service USGS U.S. Geological Survey Atlantic Coast Pipeline iii Individual 401 Water Quality Certification West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection 1.0 OVERVIEW AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC (Atlantic) is a company formed by four major U.S. energy companies—Dominion Resources, Inc. (Dominion) (NYSE: D); Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE: DUK); Piedmont Natural Gas Co., Inc. (NYSE: PNY); and AGL Resources, Inc. (NYSE: GAS). The company was created to develop, own, and operate the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP or Project), an approximately 603.8-mile-long interstate natural gas transmission pipeline system designed to meet growing energy needs in Virginia and North Carolina (see Appendix A, figure 1). The ACP will be capable of delivering up to 1.5 million dekatherms per day (MMDth/d) of natural gas that will be used to generate electricity, heat homes, and run local businesses. The Project will facilitate cleaner air, increase the reliability and security of natural gas supplies, and provide a significant economic boost in West Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. More information is provided at the company’s website at www.dom.com/acpipeline. Atlantic has contracted with Dominion Transmission, Inc. (DTI), a subsidiary of Dominion, to permit, build, and operate the ACP on behalf of Atlantic. Atlantic is seeking authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) under Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act to construct, own, operate, and maintain the following proposed facilities for the ACP system: Mainline Pipeline Facilities: AP-1: approximately 333.1 miles of underground 42-inch outside diameter natural gas transmission pipeline in Harrison, Lewis, Upshur, Randolph, and Pocahontas Counties, West Virginia; Highland, Bath, Augusta, Nelson, Buckingham, Cumberland, Prince Edward, Nottoway, Dinwiddie, Brunswick, and Greensville Counties, Virginia; and Northampton County, North Carolina. AP-2: approximately 186.0 miles of underground 36-inch outside diameter natural gas transmission pipeline in Northampton, Halifax, Nash, Wilson, Johnston, Sampson, Cumberland, and Robeson Counties, North Carolina. Lateral Pipeline Facilities: AP-3: approximately 83.2 miles of underground 20-inch outside diameter natural gas lateral pipeline in Northampton County, North Carolina; and Greensville and Southampton Counties and the Cities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indian Warfare, Household Competency, and the Settlement of the Western Virginia Frontier, 1749 to 1794
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2007 Indian warfare, household competency, and the settlement of the western Virginia frontier, 1749 to 1794 John M. Boback West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Boback, John M., "Indian warfare, household competency, and the settlement of the western Virginia frontier, 1749 to 1794" (2007). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 2566. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/2566 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Indian Warfare, Household Competency, and the Settlement of the Western Virginia Frontier, 1749 to 1794 John M. Boback Dissertation submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor
    [Show full text]
  • 7Q10 Analysis Chart for Report
    Appendix K 7Q10 (Low Flow) Analysis Appendix K: 7Q10 Analysis 7Q10 MINUS AVERAGE DAILY 7Q10 DAILY DAILY MAXIMUM 7Q10 IN MINUS MAXIMUM REPORTED DECIMAL DECIMAL FACILITY NAME COUNTY POTENTIAL 7Q10 GALLONS COMMENT AVERAGE SOURCE POTENTIAL FLOW LATITUDE LONGITUDE TO PER DAY DAILY TO FROM WITHDRAW FLOW WITHDRAW SURVEY AGGREGATES QUARRY RANDOLPH 80,809 2.2870 1,478,024 1,397,215 TYGART RIVER 38.92666667 -79.90861111 ALBRIGHT POWER STATION PRESTON 248,300,000 22.5000 14,541,120 -233,758,880 1,813 14,539,307 CHEAT RIVER 39.48944444 -79.63611111 GREENBRIER RIVER AT ALDERSON WATER TREATMENT PLANT GREENBRIER 900000 12.0630 7,795,979 6,895,979 ALDERSON WV Incorrect lat. ALEX ENERGY SURFACE MINES NICHOLAS 410,400 0.0030 1,939 -408,461 and long.? TWENTY MILE CREEK 38.30027778 -81.02027778 ROBINSON FORK OF ALEX ENERGY SURFACE MINES NICHOLAS 410,400 0.0050 3,231 -407,169 42,815 -39,584 TWENTY MILE CREEK 38.32166667 -80.98194444 AMERICAN FIBER RESOURCES MARION 8,640,000 340.0000 219,732,480 211,092,480 MONONGAHELA RIVER 39.52472222 -80.12777778 EAST FORK TWELVEPOLE ARGUS ENERGY, KIAH CREEK OPERATION WAYNE 396,000 0.1920 124,084 -271,916 69,523 54,561 CREEK 38.02777778 -82.29055556 ARMSTRONG PSD FAYETTE 216,632 1,890.0000 1,221,454,080 1,221,237,448 KANAWHA RIVER BANDMILL PREPARATION PLANT LOGAN 63,000 0.1600 103,404 40,404 RUM CREEK 37.81138889 -81.87111111 BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, INSTITUTE PLANT KANAWHA 411,120,000 1,980.0000 1,279,618,560 868,498,560 KANAWHA RIVER 38.38 -81.78 BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, INSTITUTE PLANT KANAWHA 411,120,000 1,980.0000 1,279,618,560
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment for Dam Modifications on the West Fork River Harrison County, West Virginia
    Final Environmental Assessment for Dam Modifications on the West Fork River Harrison County, West Virginia REPORT PREPARED BY: USDA NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE IN COOPERATION WITH U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR THE: City of Clarksburg, WV - Clarksburg Water Board November 2010 November 2010 2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DAM MODIFICATIONS ON THE WEST FORK RIVER Harrison County, West Virginia West Virginia Second Congressional District Responsible Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Local Sponsor: Clarksburg Water Board Cooperating Agency: US Fish and Wildlife Service Project Location: Harrison County, West Virginia For More Information: State Conservationist USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service 75 High Street, Room 301 Morgantown, WV 26505 Phone: (304) 284-7540 Fax: (304) 284-4839 or Project Leader West Virginia Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 694 Beverly Pike Elkins, WV 26241 Phone: 304 636 6586 Fax: (304) 636 7824 Environmental Assessment Designation: FINAL Abstract: This Final Environmental Assessment describes the anticipated effects of removing three obsolete run- of-the-river water supply dams and modification of a fourth dam with an aquatic life passage structure in the West Fork River. This project proposes to restore, to the greatest extent possible, the aquatic and ecological integrity of at least forty miles of the West Fork River and many more miles of adjoining tributaries. This project has the potential to restore more suitable habitat for as many as twenty-five species of freshwater mussels including two federally listed species. Liability to the dam’s owners, the Clarksburg Water Board, will be substantially reduced with implementation of the recommended alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Loads for the West Fork River Watershed, West Virginia
    Total Maximum Daily Loads for the West Fork River Watershed, West Virginia USEPA Approved July 2014 On the cover: Photos provided by WVDEP Division of Water and Waste Management West Fork River Watershed: TMDL Report CONTENTS Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Definitions................................................................................ iv Executive Summary................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 Report Format....................................................................................................................1 2.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................1 2.1 Total Maximum Daily Loads...................................................................................1 2.2 Water Quality Standards..........................................................................................4 3.0 Watershed Description and Data Inventory....................................................................5 3.1 Watershed Description.............................................................................................5 3.2 Data Inventory .........................................................................................................7 3.3 Impaired Waterbodies..............................................................................................9 4.0 Biological Impairment and Stressor Identification ......................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 3, 2011-2012
    HACKER’S CREEK JOURNAL Hacker’s Creek Pioneer Descendants A Historical & Genealogical Society of Central West Virginia Volume XXX Issue 3, 2011-2012 ISBN : 0893-1615 From the Desk 1 HCPD Celebrates 30th Anniversary 2 Letter to Editor 3 A Pump, an Outhouse and a Washtub . 4 Daniel Conrad Will 6 Burns, Porter & Summers 7 The Ingles Family 8 A Brake Letter 9 Allegheny Backtracks 9 Francis Ancestry 10 Raymond M. Ware 12 The Family of Johannes M. Bush 13 Blood Covered Hills 17 The O’Briens 20 The Ramsay Family 25 Hacker’s Creek Journal is published quarterly by the Hacker’s Creek Pioneer Descendants. Manuscript Submissions Material for publication should be addressed to Journal Editor and mailed to HCPD at the address below. Material must be received by mid-January for March issue; mid-April for June issue, mid-July for September issue and mid-October for December issue. Membership For HCPD membership information, see the Membership Form in back of Journal. HCPD Mailing Address: Hacker’s Creek Pioneer Descendants, Inc., 45 Abbotts Run Road, Horner, WV 26372. Office Hours Thurs. 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.; (We close at 3 on Mondays until further notice.) Mon.,Tues., Wed. & Fri. 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Sat. 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. The HCPD office is closed on National, State, and Local Election Days and on the following holidays: Good Friday, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving weekend, Dec. 22, 2012-Jan. 1, 2013 Phone & Internet: Telephone: (304) 269-7091 Fax: (304) 269-4430 E-mail: [email protected] HCPD Website: http://www.hackerscreek.com Executive Director: Betty Ann Nicholson HACKER’S Creek Pioneer Descendants Board (effective October 1, 2011) PRESIDENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mary Creamer Randall Nicholson 446 Park Street 38 Gaston Manor Road Morgantown, WV 26505 Jane Lew, WV 26378 (304) 216-5721 (304) 269-1015 [email protected] [email protected] VICE-PRESIDENT Bertha Allman Irma J.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for the Round Hickorynut Mussel (Obovaria Subrotunda)
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Round Hickorynut Mussel (Obovaria subrotunda) Photo credit: Environment Canada October 2019 Version 1.0 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Atlanta, GA 1 Primary Contributors • Andrew Henderson - Asheville Field Office, Lead Biologist (Region 4) – primary author • Heidi Crowell - Pacific Southwest Regional Office, SAT Project Manager (Region 8) • Mark Endries - Asheville Field Office (Region 4) – mapping support Contributors & Agency Reviewers (underlined) • Paul Hartfield, Leroy Koch (retired), Angela Boyer, Stephanie Chance (retired), Bob Anderson, Tyler Hern, Andy Ford, Patty Morrison (retired), Bob Butler (retired), Josh Hundley (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) • Dr. Todd Morris (Fisheries & Oceans Canada) • Chuck Howard (retired), Tim Keeling (Tennessee Valley Authority) • Kierstin Carlson (Western Pennsylvania Conservancy) • Steve Ahlstedt (retired) (U.S. Geological Survey) • Dr. Arthur Bogan, Jamie Smith (North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences) • Jeremy Tiemann, Rachel Vinsel, Kevin Cummings (Illinois Natural History Survey) • Heidi Dunn, Emily Grossman (Ecological Specialists, Inc.) • Dr. Paul Johnson, Jeff Garner, Michael Buntin, Todd Fobian, Ashley Peters (Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources) • Gerry Dinkins (University of Tennessee) • Matt Johnson, Greg Zimmermann (EnviroScience, Inc.) • Mike Compton, Ian Horn (Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission) • Chad Lewis, Clarissa Lawliss (Lewis Environmental Consulting) • Nevin Welte (Pennsylvania Boat and Fish Commission) • Amy Mahar, Nick Conrad (New York Natural Heritage Program) • Darran Crabtree (New York Chapter, The Nature Conservancy) • Debbie Wolschki (Ohio Natural Heritage Program) • Janet Clayton (West Virginia Natural Resources) • Brant Fisher (Indiana Department of Natural Resources) • Dr. Monte McGregor, Adam Shepard, Keith Wethington (Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources) • Stuart McGregor (Geological Survey of Alabama) • Don Hubbs, Jason Wisenwski (Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency) • Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Central West Virginia's Multiracial Community
    Founding Chestnut Ridge: The Origins of Central West Virginia’s Multiracial Community A Senior Honors Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation with research distinction in History in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University. by Alexandra Finley The Ohio State University March 2010 Project Advisor: Professor Randolph Roth, Department of History 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………3 Introduction: The “Guineas” of West Virginia…..……………………………………………4 I. Race and the Male Brothers……………….……………………………………………….21 II. The Legend of Sam Norris…………………………………………………………..........46 III. The Life of Gustavus Croston ……………………………………………………...……64 IV. Henry Dalton’s Fate……………………………..……………………………………….76 V. The Chestnut Ridge People…………………………………………….………………….90 Appendix A: Associated Surnames and Variant Spellings…………………………………...104 Appendix B: Related Genealogies……………………………………………………………105 Appendix C: The Legend of Sam Norris……………………………………………………..107 Appendix D: The Writings of Bill Peat Norris……………………………………………….110 Appendix E: Associated Families…………………………………………………………….118 Appendix F: Maps…………………………………………………………………………….129 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………..134 2 Acknowledgements This research could not have been completed without the generous assistance of many individuals. First and foremost among these are my mom, dad, and grandpa, who have listened to drafts and patiently paid attention (or at least courteously pretended to) while I verbally sorted out my thought processes. A large thank you also goes to my mom for fearlessly driving us over not just Bald Knob Mountain and Saddle Mountain, but also Backbone Mountain, which, unbeknownst to us at the time, is the highest point in the state of Maryland, all in the quest for my research’s “holy grail.” I owe many thanks to my advisor, Dr. Randolph Roth, for his support and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 – Watershed Tracking
    Appendix 1 – Watershed tracking Plan Name Watershed Sub Watershed Sub BMP/Action Unit Goal Implemented TMLD LRs % Pollutant ID Unit LR Watershed Implemented Achieved Deckers Deckers WV Deckers WV M-8 Aggregated BMP Load Reductions Creek Creek Main Deckers Deckers WV Deckers WV M-8 Passive Treatment 1.00 Creek Creek Main Deckers Deckers WV Deep WV M-8-A.7 Passive Treatment 1.00 Creek Creek Hollow Deckers Deckers WV Dilan Creek WV M-8-G Passive Treatment 1.00 Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Hartman WV M-8- Passive Treatment 2.00 Creek Creek Run O.5A Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Aggregated BMP Load Reductions 9,350.00 Metals 52,929.00 Creek Creek Creek (Aluminum) Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Aggregated BMP Load Reductions 45,471.00 Metals (Iron) 72,119.00 Creek Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Aggregated BMP Load Reductions Acidity LBS/YR 135,800.00 Creek Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Constructed Wetland Aerobic INDIVIDUAL 3.00 3.00 100 Creek Creek Creek UNITS Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Land Reconstruction, Abandoned UNITS 1.00 1.00 100 Creek Creek Creek Mined Land Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Limestone Doser UNITS 2.00 2.00 100 Creek Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Limestone Open Channel UNITS 4.00 4.00 100 Creek Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Kanes WV M-8-I Sulfate Reducing Bioreactor UNITS 1.00 1.00 100 Creek Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Laurel Run WV M-8-H Passive Treatment 1.00 Creek Creek Deckers Deckers WV Slab Camp WV M-8-F Aggregated BMP Load Reductions 4,974.00 Metals
    [Show full text]
  • Tygart Valley River Watershed 1
    The Tygart Valley River Watershed 1 An Ecological Assessment of the Tygart Valley River Watershed Report number - 05020001 - 2003 prepared by: Watershed Assessment Section Watershed Branch Division of Water and Waste Management West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection 1201 Greenbrier Street, Charleston, WV 25311 www.dep.state.wv.us 2 An Ecological Assessment of Table of Contents Summary .......................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................... 7 Watersheds and Their Assessment ................................................................ 8 General Watershed Assessment Strategy ................................................. 9 Probabilistic (Random) Sampling............................................................. 11 The Tygart Valley River Watershed ...............................................................13 Human Population and Land Use ..............................................................16 Watershed Assessment Methods .................................................................17 Biological Monitoring — Benthic Macroinvertebrates................................17 West Virginia Stream Condition Index ......................................................21 Fecal Coliform Bacteria.............................................................................23 Physicochemical Sampling .......................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Spirit Leveling in West Virginia
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 632 SPIRIT LEVELING IN WEST VIRGINIA 1896 TO 1915, INCLUSIVE R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER Work done in cooperation with the West Virginia State Geological Survey during 1898 to 1315, inclusive I. C. WHITE, State Geologist WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 10 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation............................................................ 5 Previous publication...................:.............................. 5 Personnel............................................................. 5 Classification.......................................................... 5 Bench marks........................................................... 6 Datura............................................................... 6 Topographic maps. ................................................ ^.... 7 Precise leveling............................................................ 8 Blacksville, Fairmont, and Morgantown quadrangles (Marion, Monongalia, and Taylor counties)................................................. 8 Charleston, Hinton, Kanawha Falls, Lewisburg, and Kaleigh 30X quad­ rangles; Charleston Special, Fayetteville, and Montgomery 15' quad­ rangles (Fayette, Greenbrier, Kanawha, Raleigh
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM issued IPf^^vA, vj^MI by the SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM Vol. 84 Washington: 1937 No. 3022 ANNOTATED LIST OF WEST VIRGINIA MAMMALS By Remington Kellogg Assistant Curator, Division of Mammals, United States National Museum In the spring of 1936 the Smithsonian Institution completed ar- rangements for a party from the United States National Museum to make a collection of birds and mammals in West Virginia. In ac- cordance with instructions I accompanied the party across the State to Cabell County, where a camp was established about 4 miles east of Huntington on April 19, 1936. After making a number of short trips along the stream valleys of adjoining counties to appraise col- lecting prospects, I returned to Washington, D. C, on April 25. Watson M. Perrygo and Carleton Lingebach continued with the work until July 9 and then returned to Washington. On September 16 they went again to W^est Virginia and remained there until November 7. Included in this report are all the West Virginia specimens in the National Museum and the Biological Survey collections. Seventy- three forms of Recent mammals are recorded as present either now or formerly within the boundaries of the State. Measurements herein are given in millimeters. The collectors of the specimens herein discussed are listed as follows chronologically according to the year in w^hich the material was obtained: 152554—3T 1 443 444 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL. 84 U. S. National Museum U. S. Biological Survey Spencer F. Baird, 1850. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Tygart Valley River Watershed Assessment Final Report December 31, 2013
    West Virginia Watershed Assessment Pilot Project: Tygart Valley River Watershed Assessment Final Report December 31, 2013 WVWAPP Tygart Valley River Watershed Assessment Final Report West Virginia Watershed Assessment Pilot Project: Tygart Valley River Watershed Assessment December 31, 2013 Report Prepared by The Nature Conservancy for the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and the United States Environmental Protection Agency Misty Downing Keith Fisher Diane Packett Ruth Thornton The Nature Conservancy 194 Airport Rd Elkins, WV 26241 Phone: (304) 637-0160 E-mail: Keith Fisher, [email protected] ii WVWAPP Tygart Valley River Watershed Assessment Final Report Acknowledgments The project team would like to acknowledge the participation of several individuals and agencies who have contributed their time and expertise throughout the assessment process, from design to completion. Special thanks to our WVDEP Project Managers, Dennis Stottlemyer, Teresa Koon and Christopher Harvey, for their ongoing support and enthusiasm. Thanks also to contributing USEPA staff: Joy Gillespie, Christine Mazzarella, and Tom DeMoss. Special acknowledgment to Terry Messinger (USGS), Greg Pond (USEPA), Michael Strager (WVU), Michael Whitman (WVDEP), and Mitch Blake (WVGES), who participated in our workshops, provided valuable datasets, and made themselves available to answer questions and provide technical expertise, even outside of the workshops. Additional thanks go out to all the participants of our technical advisory meeting, expert workshops,
    [Show full text]