DOCSLIB.ORG

Spirit Leveling in West Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 632 SPIRIT LEVELING IN WEST VIRGINIA 1896 TO 1915, INCLUSIVE R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER Work done in cooperation with the West Virginia State Geological Survey during 1898 to 1315, inclusive I. C. WHITE, State Geologist WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 10 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation............................................................ 5 Previous publication...................:.............................. 5 Personnel............................................................. 5 Classification.......................................................... 5 Bench marks........................................................... 6 Datura............................................................... 6 Topographic maps. ................................................ ^.... 7 Precise leveling............................................................ 8 Blacksville, Fairmont, and Morgantown quadrangles (Marion, Monongalia, and Taylor counties)................................................. 8 Charleston, Hinton, Kanawha Falls, Lewisburg, and Kaleigh 30X quad­ rangles; Charleston Special, Fayetteville, and Montgomery 15' quad­ rangles (Fayette, Greenbrier, Kanawha, Raleigh and Summers counties). 9 Big Bend, Bluefield, and Peterstown quadrangles (Mercer and Summers counties)............................................................ 13 Primary leveling........................................................... 16 Flintstone, Frostburg, Hancock, and Pawpaw quadrangles (Berkeley, Mineral, and Morgan counties)....................................... 16 Bruceton, Morgantown, Blacksville, and Mannington quadrangles (Pres­ ton, Monongalia, Marion, and Wetzel counties) ......................... 17 Belington, Kingwood, Parsons, and Thornton 15' (St. George 30') quad­ rangles (Barbour, Preston, Randolph, Taylor, and Tucker counties).... 19 Elkins and Horton 15' (Beverly 30') quadrangles (Barbour and Ran­ dolph counties)...................................................... 23 Clarksburg, Fairmont, Philippi, and Weston quadrangles (Barbour, Har- rison, Lewis, Marion, Taylor, and Upshur counties).................... 25 Centerpoint, Littleton, and West Union quadrangles (Doddridge, Harri- son, Marshall, Ritchie, Tyler, and Wetzel counties)..................... 28 Holbrook and Vadis quadrangles (Doddridge, Gilmer, Lewis, and Ritchie counties)........................................................... 31 Burnsville, Crawford, Durbin, Gassaway, Glenville, Hacker Valley, Pickens, Sago, and Sutton Special quadrangles (Braxton, Clay, Gilmer, Lewis, Nicholas, Randolph, Upshur, and Webster counties)................... 32 Elizabeth and Harrisville quadrangles (Ritchie, Wirt, and Wood counties). 45 Arnoldsburg, Ripley, and Spencer quadrangles (Calhoun, Jackson, Roane, and Wirt counties).................................................. 48 Kenna, Otter, Walton, and Winfield quadranges (Calhoun, Clay, Jackson, Kanawha, Mason, Putnam, and Roane counties)....................... 52 Cowen, Lobelia, Richwood, Summersville, Webster Springs, and Winona 15' (Nicholas and Huntersville 30') quadrangles (Clay, Fayette, Green- brier, and Webster counties)......................................... 56 Big Bend and Meadow Creek quadrangles (Fayette and Summers coun­ ties) ............................................................ i.. 65 3 4 CONTENTS. Primary leveling Continued. Page. Clay, Clendenin, Fayetteviile, and Montgomery 15' (Kanawha Falls 3(K) quadrangles (Clay, Fayette, Kanawha, and Nicholas counties).......... 68 Charleston special, Madison, Peytona, and St. Albans 15' quadrangles (Boone, Kanawha, Lincoln, and Putnam counties).................... 76 Steubenville and Wellsville quadrangles (Brooke and Hancock counties).. 80 Cameron, New Martinsville, and Wheeling quadrangles (Brooke, Marshall, Ohio, Tyler, and Wetzel counties).................................... 81 , Belleville, Marietta, Parkersburg, and St. Marys quadrangles (Jackson, Pleasants, Bitchie, and Wood counties)................................ 83 Glenwood, Keno, Point Pleasant, and Ravenswood quadrangles (Cabell, Jackson, Mason, and Putnam counties)................................ 86 Ceredo, Guyandot, and Milton 15' (Huntington and Kenova 30') quad­ rangles (Cabell, Lincoln, Putnam, and Wayne counties)............... 89 MidHff and Wayne 15' (Huntington 30') quadrangles. (Lincoln and Wayne counties).......................................................... 91 Bluefield, Bramwell, laeger, Peterstown, Pounding Mill, and Welch . quadrangles (McDowell, Mercer, and Wyoming counties)............... 93 Gilbert, Holden, Logan, Louisa, Matewan, Naugatuck, and Williamson 15' (Kenova, Oceana, and War field 30') quadrangles (Logan, Mingo, Wayne, and Wyoming counties)...................................... 104 Bald Knob, Beckley, Eccles, Flattop, Mullens, and Pineville quadrangles (Boone, Logan, Mercer, Raleigh, and Wyoming counties)............... 118 Antietam, Berryville, Gerrardstown, and Martinsburg quadrangles (Berke­ ley, Jefferson, and Morgan counties).................................. 131 Williamsport quadrangle (Berkeley County).................... ........ 136 Appendix A: Precise leveling by the Coast and Geodetic Survey and the Bal­ timore & Ohio R. R........................................J............ 138 Appendix B: Secondary elevations......................................... 155 Index.................................................................... 157 ILLUSTRATION. Page. PLATE I. Geological Survey bench marks.................................... 5 U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 632 PLATE 1 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BENCH MARKS. A, Tablet used in cooperating States. The State name is inserted at G. B and D, Copper temporary bench mark, consisting of a nail and copper washer. A, C, and E, Tablets for stone or concrete structures. F, Iron post used where there is no rock. SPIRIT LEVELING IN WEST VIRGINIA, 1896 TO 1915, INCLUSIVE. R. B. MARSHALL, Chief Geographer. INTRODUCTION. Cooperation. The State of West Virginia contributed financially to the work in this State from 1898 to 1915, inclusive. Previous publication. The results of spirit leveling previously pub­ lished in Bulletins 399 and 477, containing descriptions and eleva­ tions of bench marks established in West Virginia from 1896 to 1910, inclusive, and based on the 1903 adjustment, have been corrected to agree with the 1907 adjustment of precise leveling of the Coast and Geodetic Survey and are here republished, together with all results of spirit leveling by the United States Geological Survey since 1910. The elevations were not changed by the 1912 adjustment and are likely to be changed but slightly by any future adjustment. Personnel. The field work from 1896 to 1906, inclusive, was done under the direction of H. M. Wilson, geographer, and that from 1907 to 1915, inclusive, was done under Frank Sutton, geographer. -The work since January, 1908, was done under the general direction of R. B. Marshall, chief geographer. Credit is given in the heading of each list to the several levelmen. The office work of computation, adjustment, and preparation of lists was done mainly by S. S. Gan­ nett, geographer, under the general direction of E. M. Douglas, geographer. Classification. The elevations are classified as precise or primary, according to the methods employed in their determination. The former are determined by lines of levels run either in both forward and backward directions or by simultaneous double-rodded lines, a high- grade instrument being used and special precautions being taken in observations and reduction to correct errors and make the line con­ tinuously good throughout. The latter or primary levels are deter­ mined with the Y level, precautions being taken against only the principal errors and the levels being run mostly in circuits of single lines. The allowable limit of error observed on the precise work 6 SPIEIT LEVELING IN WEST VIRGINIA, 1896 TO 1915. already done by the Geological Survey in this State is represented in feet by 0.02 -/D and that for the primary work by 0.05 JD, in which D is the length of circuit in miles. Bench marks. The standard bench marks are of two forms. The first form is a circular bronze or aluminum tablet (0 and E, PI. I), 3^ inches in diameter and £ inch thick, having a 3-inch stem, which is cemented in a drill hole in solid rock in the wall of some public building, a bridge abutment, or other substantial masonry structurec The second form (F, PL I), used where masonry or rock is not avail­ able, consists of a hollow wrought-iron post 3£ inches in outer diam­ eter and 4 feet in length. The bottom is spread out to a width of 10 inches in order to give a firm bearing on the earth. A bronze or aluminum-bronze cap is riveted upon the top of the post which is set about 3 feet in the ground. A third style of bench mark, with abbre­ viated lettering (B and D, PI. I), is used for unimportant points. This consists of a special copper nail 1| inches in length driven through a copper washer f- inch in diameter. The tablets as well as the caps on the iron posts are appropriately lettered, and coopera­ tion by States is indicated by
Recommended publications
  • Little Kanawha Byway

    Little Kanawha Byway

    Little Kanawha Byway Perhaps the most accessible of all of West Virginia’s byways, the Little Kanawha Byway is bookended by I-77 and I-79. Starting in the west at I-77, the parkway begins its journey in Mineral Wells and mirrors the banks of the Little Kanawha River. Being totally paved, this roadway is perfect for RVs and others wanting a smooth ride so they can take in all of the beautiful pastoral sites. Hughes River Wildlife Management Area The byway passes the Hughes River Wildlife Management Area (WMA). This 10,000-acre WMA allows hunting for turkey, deer, grouse, squirrel, and rabbit. The nearby Hughes River, along with the Little Kanawha, is filled with muskellunge, smallmouth bass, and channel catfish perfect for a weekend fishing trip. Burning Springs Further along the river, the town of Burning Springs was once one of the major hubs of the American oil industry. In 1859, and later in the 1890s, the area around Burning Springs and Parkersburg was literally seeping with oil just beneath the surface. These oil strikes turned many men into millionaires in only a few months until the shallow wells ran dry. For those interested in seeing a piece of the Mountain State’s oil history, The Parkersburg Oil & Gas Museum is restoring one of the old derricks that stood above the oilfields in Burning Springs. Burnsville Lake Wildlife Management Area At the eastern edge of the byway, the beautiful lake and surrounding protected fields and forests of the Burnsville Lake Wildlife Management Area provide a welcome respite from the hurried pace of today’s world.
  • Pohick Creek Watershed Management Plan Are Included in This Section

    Pohick Creek Watershed Management Plan Are Included in This Section

    Watershed Management Area Restoration Strategies 5.0 Watershed Management Area Restoration Strategies The Pohick Creek Watershed is divided into ten smaller watershed management areas (WMAs) based on terrain. Summaries of Pohick Creek’s ten WMAs are listed in the following WMA sections, including field reconnaissance findings, existing and future land use, stream conditions and stormwater infrastructure. For Fairfax County planning and management purposes the WMAs have been further subdivided into smaller subwatersheds. These areas, typically 100 – 300 acres, were used as the basic units for modeling and other evaluations. Each WMA was examined at the subwatershed level in order to capture as much data as possible. The subwatershed conditions were reviewed and problem areas were highlighted. Projects were proposed in problematic subwatersheds. The full Pohick Creek Draft Watershed Workbook, which contains detailed watershed characterizations, can be found in the Technical Appendices. Pohick Creek has four major named tributaries (see Map 3-1.1 in Chapter 3). In the northern portions of the watershed two main tributaries converge into Pohick Creek stream. The Rabbit Branch tributary begins in the highly developed areas of George Mason University and Fairfax City, while Sideburn Branch tributary begins in the highly developed area southwest of George Mason University. The confluence of these two headwater tributaries forms the Pohick Creek main stem. The Middle Run tributary drains Huntsman Lake and moderately-developed residential areas. The South Run tributary drains Burke Lake and Lake Mercer, as well as the low-density southwestern portion of the watershed. The restoration strategies proposed to be implemented within the next ten years (0 – 10-year plan) consist of 90 structural projects.
  • Notable Local Floods of 1942-43

    Notable Local Floods of 1942-43

    Notable Local Floods of 1942-43 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1134 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1952 CONTENTS The letters in parenthesis preceding the titles are those used to designate the separate chapters] Page (A) Flood of August 4-5, 1943, in central West Virginia, by H. M. Erskine. 1 (B) Floods of July 18, 1942, in north-central Pennsylvania, by William S. Eisenlohr, Jr________________________________________________ 59 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE 1. Map of West Virginia showing location of points where flood determinations were made__________--_-_--__-_-_-_--__-_ 48 2. Map of flood area showing locations of stream-gaging stations, rainfall-measurement points, and isohyetal lines for July 17-18, 1942-____-___________________-___-______--_-_-____- In pocket FIGURE 1. Map of West Virginia showing location of Little Kanawha River basin_________________________-__-__--_-_---_-_ 2 2. Residence of Yeager family, which was flooded. ____________ 5 3. Residence, near Heaters, which was washed dowiistream_____ 6 4. Washed-out railroad bridge on Copen Run _________________ 6 5. Washed-out fill on State Route 5 at Jobs Run______________ 7 6. Rock and mud deposit from a hillside wash________________ 7 7. Typical sand and gravel deposits__________________________ 8 8. Typical hillside erosion_____________________-_____-__--__ 8 9. Cornfield destroyed by flood. _--_____________-__-__-_-__- 9 10. Isohyetal map of Little Kanawha River basin showing total rainfall July 26-30, 1943__________________--_-____--- 10 11. Isohyetal map of Little Kanawha River basin showing total rainfall August 4-5, 1943__ ______________-___-_--__--__ 13 12.
  • Area Information

    Area Information

    AREA INFORMATION The area is known as the Potomac Highlands. The Allegheny Mountains run right through the region which is the highest watershed for the Potomac River, the largest river feeding into the Chesapeake Bay. The region is renowned for amazing views, high elevation blueberry and spruce stands, dense rhododendron thickets, hundreds of Brook Trout streams, and miles of backcountry trails. Much of the Potomac Highlands is within the one million acre Monongahela National Forest which features National Wilderness areas like Otter Creek, Dolly Sods, Cranberry Glades, Roaring Plains West, and Laurel Fork North. The region is ideal for hiking, rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, canoeing, fishing, and hunting which are all popular activities in the area. The Shavers Fork is a stocked trout stream and maintained by WV Division of Natural Resources, as are many other rivers in the area. Wonderful skiing can be experienced at Timberline, Canaan Valley, Whitegrass Nordic Center Ski areas and Snowshoe Mountain Resort, which are all less than 40 miles from our door. State Parks and forests in the area include Blackwater Falls, Canaan Valley, Audra, Kumbrabow, Seneca, and Cathedral. Federal Recreation areas include Spruce Knob & Seneca Rocks management area, Smoke Hole Canyon, Stuarts Recreation Area, Gaudineer Knob, and Spruce Knob Lake. The region is within 5 hours of half of the nation’s population yet offers a mountain playground second to none. Elkins deserves its high ranking in America's Best Small Art Towns. Elkins is home to Davis and Elkins College and the Augusta Heritage Arts Center, The Mountain State Forest Festival and our thriving Randolph County Community Arts Center (www.randolpharts.org).
  • Crayfishes of the Cheat River Watershed in West Virginia and Pennsylvania

    Crayfishes of the Cheat River Watershed in West Virginia and Pennsylvania

    CRAYFISHES OF THE CHEAT RIVER WATERSHED IN WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA. PART II. OBSERVATIONS UPON ECOLOGICAL FACTORS RELATING TO DISTRIBUTION1 FRANK J. SCHWARTZ AND WILLIAM G. MEREDITH Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, Maryland and Ml. St. Mary's College, Emmittsburg, Maryland Schwartz and Meredith (1960) presented as Part I the localities and species of crayfishes (Decapoda) currently found throughout the Cheat River watershed of West Virginia and Pennsylvania. These records indicated that two species, Cambarus bartoni and Orconectes obscurus, now occupy the Cheat system. Litera- ture records occur for Cambarus bartoni carinirostris (Faxon, 1914; Ortmann, 1931) and Cambarus carolinus (Ortmann, 1931) in addition to the forms mentioned. Bick et al. (1953) have reviewed the meager literature relating to the ecology of acid mine streams. Bowden (1961) has called attention to the effects of strip mines on faunal ecologies. The former have also shown the detrimental effects to the fauna and ecology of a Louisiana acid stream after it was altered by channel dredging. A casual scanning of the data will reveal peculiarities in the distributions of the present species. C. bartoni, although taken at 138 stations of the 233 sampled (fig. 1), is absent today from the central portion and a number of the tributaries of the Cheat system. The greatest number of collections was made in the head- waters of the system. 0. obscurus (fig. 2) occurs in only a few of the lower elevation streams, and was absent from the headwaters and central zone of the watershed. C. b. carinirostris (fig. 1), a species once described from the Cheat system and whose center of abundance was believed to be in the Cheat system streams of Randolph, Tucker, and Pocahontas counties (Faxon, 1914), was not found during the present study.

  • District 1 Fishing Guide

    TROUT STOCKING – Rivers and Streams Code No. Stockings ............Period Code No. Stockings ............Period Code No. Stockings ............Period Trout Stocking River or Stream: County SR = state Route Q One .................................... 1st week of March One ......................................................... February CR Varies .............................................................Varies Code: Area CR = county Route FR = USFS Road One ............................................................January BW M One each month ................February-May One every two weeks ...........March-May Tygart Lake (Tailwaters) Tygart Valley River: W Two ......................................................... February MJ One each month ..................January-April Taylor M-F: below Tygart Dam in Grafton City Park. One ............................................................January One each week ..........................March-May Y One ...................................................................April BA BW: Lower – from Wheeling Hospital upstream to I-470; X After April 1 or area is open to public One ............................................................... March F Once/week .....Columbus Day week & next week Wheeling Creek: Marshall and Ohio Middle – from Ohio County line upstream along CR 5 to 1 mile below Burches Run Lake; Upper – from Pennsylvania line 3 miles downstream along CR 15 and 15/1 to mouth of Wolf Run. Whiteday Creek: Marion and Monongalia BW: Lower – from 0.5 mile above CR 73 bridge upstream for 2 miles along CR 73/1; Trout Stocking Upper – from CR 79/12 bridge upstream 1 mile to 0.25 mile below the CR 33/7 bridge. River or Stream: County SR = state Route Code: Area CR = county Route FR = USFS Road BW: from Bruceton Mills upstream to Clifton Mills along CR 8; also at CR 4/2 State Line Bridge near Big Sandy Creek: Preston the Pennsylvania state line. W-F: from Davis upstream 4 miles along the Camp 70 Road; also a 3-mile section at the SR 32 Blackwater River: Tucker bridge.
  • “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long

    “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long

    STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE i “A people who have not the pride to record their History will not long have virtues to make History worth recording; and Introduction no people who At the rear of Old Main at Bethany College, the sun shines through are indifferent an arcade. This passageway is filled with students today, just as it was more than a hundred years ago, as shown in a c.1885 photograph. to their past During my several visits to this college, I have lingered here enjoying the light and the student activity. It reminds me that we are part of the past need hope to as well as today. People can connect to historic resources through their make their character and setting as well as the stories they tell and the memories they make. future great.” The National Register of Historic Places recognizes historic re- sources such as Old Main. In 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office Virgil A. Lewis, first published Historic West Virginia which provided brief descriptions noted historian of our state’s National Register listings. This second edition adds approx- Mason County, imately 265 new listings, including the Huntington home of Civil Rights West Virginia activist Memphis Tennessee Garrison, the New River Gorge Bridge, Camp Caesar in Webster County, Fort Mill Ridge in Hampshire County, the Ananias Pitsenbarger Farm in Pendleton County and the Nuttallburg Coal Mining Complex in Fayette County. Each reveals the richness of our past and celebrates the stories and accomplishments of our citizens. I hope you enjoy and learn from Historic West Virginia.
  • Indian Warfare, Household Competency, and the Settlement of the Western Virginia Frontier, 1749 to 1794

    Indian Warfare, Household Competency, and the Settlement of the Western Virginia Frontier, 1749 to 1794

    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2007 Indian warfare, household competency, and the settlement of the western Virginia frontier, 1749 to 1794 John M. Boback West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Boback, John M., "Indian warfare, household competency, and the settlement of the western Virginia frontier, 1749 to 1794" (2007). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 2566. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/2566 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Indian Warfare, Household Competency, and the Settlement of the Western Virginia Frontier, 1749 to 1794 John M. Boback Dissertation submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy

    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy

    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
  • Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia

    Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia

    Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia By Ronald D. Evaldi and Katherine S. Paybins Prepared in cooperation with the Berkeley County Commission Data Series 216 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Evaldi, R.D., and Paybins, K.S., 2006, Base-flow yields of watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 216, 4 p., 1 pl. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
  • The Natural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia

    The Natural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia

    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2010 The aN tural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia Linh Diem Phu Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Phu, Linh Diem, "The aN tural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia" (2010). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 787. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Natural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia Thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences By Linh Diem Phu Dr. Thomas K. Pauley, Ph.D., Committee Chairperson Dr. Dan Evans, Ph.D. Dr. Suzanne Strait, Ph.D. Marshall University May 2010 Abstract Turtles are unique evolutionary marvels that evolved from amphibians and developed their protective shelled form more than 200 million years ago. In West Virginia, there are 10 native species of turtles, 9 of which are aquatic. Most of these aquatic turtles feed on carrion and dead plant matter, in the water and essentially "clean" our water systems. Turtles are long-lived animals with sensitive life stages that can serve as both long-term and short-term bioindicators of environmental health. With the increase in commercial trade, habitat fragmentation, degradation, destruction, there has been a marked decline in turtle species.
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia

    Gazetteer of West Virginia

    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.