DOCSLIB.ORG

Plants Not Pipes: Promoting Green Infrastructure and Its Side Benefits in Region VI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plants Not Pipes: Promoting Green Infrastructure and Its Side Benefits in Region VI Plants Not Pipes: Promoting Green Infrastructure and its Side Benefits in Region VI Prepared by: Downstream Strategies 219 Wall Street Morgantown, WV 26505 www.downstreamstrategies.com Evan Hansen, Anne Hereford, Fritz Boettner, Sera Zegre Prepared for: Region VI Planning and Development Council Jim Hall, Executive Director 34 Mountain Park Drive White Hall, WV 26554 Photos: Sherry Wilkins. August 25, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 2. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 TYPES OF GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE.............................................................................................................. 6 2.1.1 Infiltration ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Evapotranspiration ......................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Capture and use ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.1.4 Managed conveyance .................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Conservation design ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Low impact landscaping ................................................................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Infill development and brownfields redevelopment ....................................................................... 8 2.3 SIDE BENEFITS ......................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 Direct monetary savings................................................................................................................. 9 2.3.2 Indirect monetary savings ............................................................................................................ 10 2.3.3 Other side benefits ....................................................................................................................... 11 3. STREAM IMPACTS .......................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 STORMWATER POLLUTANTS ..................................................................................................................... 13 3.2 CURRENT STATUS OF REGION VI SURFACE WATERS ...................................................................................... 14 4. GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE UNITED STATES ............................................................................ 17 4.1 DOWNSPOUT DISCONNECTION ................................................................................................................. 17 4.2 RAIN BARRELS AND CISTERNS ................................................................................................................... 18 4.3 RAIN GARDENS ...................................................................................................................................... 19 4.4 BIOSWALES .......................................................................................................................................... 19 4.5 TERRACED PLANTER SYSTEMS ................................................................................................................... 20 4.6 GREEN ROOFS ....................................................................................................................................... 21 4.7 GREEN WALLS ....................................................................................................................................... 22 4.8 URBAN TREES ....................................................................................................................................... 23 4.9 TRAFFIC ISLANDS, CURB EXTENSIONS, AND SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING ............................................................... 23 4.10 PERVIOUS PAVEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 24 5. GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE IN WEST VIRGINIA AND REGION VI .......................................................... 26 5.1 DOWNSPOUT DISCONNECTION ................................................................................................................. 26 5.2 RAIN BARRELS AND CISTERNS ................................................................................................................... 26 5.3 RAIN GARDENS ...................................................................................................................................... 27 5.4 BIOSWALES .......................................................................................................................................... 30 5.5 GREEN ROOFS ....................................................................................................................................... 31 5.6 GREEN WALLS ....................................................................................................................................... 33 5.7 URBAN TREES ....................................................................................................................................... 33 5.8 TRAFFIC ISLANDS, CURB EXTENSIONS, AND SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING ............................................................... 33 5.9 POROUS PAVEMENT ............................................................................................................................... 33 5.10 LEVEL SPREADERS .................................................................................................................................. 34 ii 6. EXISTING POLICIES AND RULES ACROSS THE UNITED STATES ........................................................... 35 6.1 FEE DISCOUNTS ..................................................................................................................................... 35 6.2 DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES ..................................................................................................................... 36 6.3 REBATES AND INSTALLATION FINANCING .................................................................................................... 36 6.4 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING .................................................................................................................... 37 6.5 GRANTS ............................................................................................................................................... 37 6.6 AWARDS AND RECOGNITION .................................................................................................................... 37 6.7 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................... 37 6.8 MODEL DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES ........................................................................................................... 38 6.9 ABANDONED AND DILAPIDATED STRUCTURES PROGRAMS .............................................................................. 38 6.10 OTHER REGULATIONS ............................................................................................................................. 39 7. EXISTING POLICIES AND RULES IN REGION VI .................................................................................. 40 7.1 FEE DISCOUNTS ..................................................................................................................................... 40 7.2 DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES ..................................................................................................................... 40 7.3 REBATES AND INSTALLATION FINANCING .................................................................................................... 40 7.4 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING .................................................................................................................... 40 7.5 GRANTS ............................................................................................................................................... 40 7.6 AWARDS AND RECOGNITION .................................................................................................................... 40 7.7 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................... 41 7.8 ABANDONED AND DILAPIDATED STRUCTURES PROGRAMS .............................................................................. 41 7.9 OTHER REGULATIONS ............................................................................................................................. 41 8. GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE TOOLS .................................................................................................... 45 8.1 CATCHING THE RAIN RESOURCE GUIDE.....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Roof for Stormwater Management in a Highly Urbanized Area: the Case of Seoul, Korea
    sustainability Article Green Roof for Stormwater Management in a Highly Urbanized Area: The Case of Seoul, Korea Muhammad Shafique 1,2, Reeho Kim 1,2,* and Kwon Kyung-Ho 3 1 Department of Smart City and Construction Engineering, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, University of Science & Technology (UST), 217, Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34113, Korea; shafi[email protected] 2 Environmental & Plant Engineering Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 83, Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10223, Korea 3 Urban Water Cycle Research Center, Korea Institute of Safe Drinking Water Research, Anyang si, Gyeonggi-do 14059, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-9100-291 Received: 26 December 2017; Accepted: 21 February 2018; Published: 26 February 2018 Abstract: Urbanization changes natural pervious surfaces to hard, impervious surfaces such as roads, buildings and roofs. These modifications significantly affect the natural hydrologic cycle by increasing stormwater runoff rates and volume. Under these circumstances, green roofs offer multiple benefits including on-site stormwater management that mimics the natural hydrologic conditions in an urban area. It can retain a large amount of rainwater for a longer time and delay the peak discharge. However, there is very limited research that has been carried out on the retrofitted green roof for stormwater management for South Korean conditions. This study has investigated the performance of retrofitted green roofs for stormwater management in a highly urbanized area of Seoul, the capital city of Korea. In this study, various storm events were monitored and the research results were analyzed to check the performance of the green roof with controlling the runoff in urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Roof Irrigation Solutions on the Market
    GREEN ROOF IRRIGATION Comprehensive Solutions for Rooftop Environments RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL IRRIGATION | Built on Innovation® hunterindustries.com THE BETTER THE IRRIGATION, the Greener the Roof Green roofs have become key components of sustainability in urban environments. They help keep buildings cool, provide habitat for increased biodiversity, and improve local air quality. As the world’s leading manufacturer of irrigation products, we are committed to developing highly efficient solutions for all landscapes, including green roofs. With best-in-class subsurface and overhead irrigation options using top-level control systems, we offer the most versatile and robust green roof irrigation solutions on the market. Built on Innovation® When designing a green roof irrigation system, you can choose a subsurface, overhead, or combined approach. We provide an array of solutions for each method. SUBSURFACE OVERHEAD An absolute revolution in subsurface irrigation, When paired with Pro-Spray® pop-ups and shrub Eco-Mat® provides green roof designers with the adapters, high-efficiency MP Rotator® nozzles most efficient irrigation solution ever developed. provide an effective solution for green roof irrigation. Eco-Mat incorporates fleece-wrapped dripline with an Thanks to their slow and steady application rate, integrated synthetic fleece mat. Installed just beneath MP Rotator nozzles provide unmatched distribution the optimal root depth of the selected plant material, uniformity for overhead irrigation. Green roof soils Eco-Mat uses specialized technology to efficiently tend to be loose, so a slow precipitation rate from the irrigate from the bottom up with the following benefits: nozzle prevents fast drainage through the soil. The multi-trajectory, multi-stream application method • Effectively holds water for future use by plants of the MP Rotator cuts through wind while gently • Eliminates water loss due to wind and evaporation hydrating the landscape at an even rate that soils • Spreads water efficiently and evenly throughout the can better absorb.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Architecture and Water Reuse: Examples from Different Countries
    Green architecture and water reuse: examples from different countries This paper shows different examples from different countries (Italy, India, Tanzania) of green architectural solutions (green wall, green roof, roof wetland) in which water (rain and treated greywater) are reused as a resource, in order to reduce the use of drinking water for activities not needing a high quality of water. Authors: Fabio Masi, Anacleto Rizzo, Riccardo Bresciani Abstract Water is a valuable resource which should be better managed to develop a sustainable future. Green architecture is starting to be largely applied, principally for aesthetic improvement of urban centres. However, green architectural solutions provide different additional benefits, among which the reuse of rain and treated grey water. Hence, green architecture can be also viewed as an option to limit the waste of drinking water for applications where the required quality can be lower. In this paper we report the application of three different green architectural solutions in which rain and treated grey water are reused (roof wetland, green roof, and green wall) in three different countries (Tanzania, Italy, and India). Technical data: Roof constructed wetland (Tanzania): • Greywater reused for irrigation • Greywater consumption of max 4 m3 per day • Sewer network for greywater and blackwater segregation • Two-chamber tank (2 m3) as pre-treatment • Pumping station (1.1 kW power, 30 l/min) to feed CW on the roof • Horizontal flow constructed wetland (23 m2, HRT 0.8 d) for greywater treatment
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure Designs
    GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGNS SCALABLE SOLUTIONS TO LOCAL CHALLENGES UPDATE SEPTEMBER 2017 ABOUT DELTA INSTITUTE Founded in 1998, Delta Institute is a Chicago-based nonprofit organization working to build a more resilient environment and economy through sustainable solutions. Visit online at www.delta-institute.org. This publication was originally released in July 2015 with support from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration through the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR, CFDA Number 11.419). The September 2017 update adds two new green infrastructure designs to the toolkit. Delta thanks Tim King PE, LEED AP BD+C and Luke Leising, AIA, PE, LEED AP O+M of Guidon Design for their work designing the initial five templates. Guidon Design, Inc. is a multi-disciplinary architecture and engineering firm. Delta also acknowledges the work of graduate students Loren Ayala and Liliana Hernandez-Gonzalez, civil and environmental engineering students at Northwestern University and Kimberly Grey, Chair of Chair of Civil & Environmental Engineering at Northwestern in developing the box tree filter and green roof designs. Additionally, Delta acknowledges Claire Costello, an undergraduate student at University of Chicago for her assistance reviewing, editing and preparing additional components for publication. Additionally, we are grateful to the following Calumet region communities for their contributions and review of the toolkit: Jodi Prout, City of Blue Island Jason Berry, City of Blue Island Dawn Haley, Village of Riverdale Mary Ryan, Village of Calumet Park Bryan Swanson, City of Calumet City Stan Urban, Village of Dolton Hildy Kingma, Village of Park Forest Ernestine Beck-Fulgham, Village of Robbins Finally, Delta Institute thanks Josh Ellis of the Metropolitan Planning Council, and the Calumet Stormwater Collaborative for their support of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Green Infrastructure Design for the Blake Street Transit
    2012 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Urban Land Conservancy Denver, Colorado Conceptual Green Infrastructure Design for the Blake Street Transit-Oriented Development Site, City of Denver AUGUST 2013 Photo: Denver Housing Authority, Park Avenue Development EPA 830-R-13-002 About the Green Infrastructure Technical Assistance Program Stormwater runoff is a major cause of water pollution in urban areas. When rain falls in undeveloped areas, the water is absorbed and filtered by soil and plants. When rain falls on our roofs, streets, and parking lots, however, the water cannot soak into the ground. In most urban areas, stormwater is drained through engineered collection systems and discharged into nearby waterbodies. The stormwater carries trash, bacteria, heavy metals, and other pollutants from the urban landscape, polluting the receiving waters. Higher flows also can cause erosion and flooding in urban streams, damaging habitat, property, and infrastructure. Green infrastructure uses vegetation, soils, and natural processes to manage water and create healthier urban environments. At the scale of a city or county, green infrastructure refers to the patchwork of natural areas that provides habitat, flood protection, cleaner air, and cleaner water. At the scale of a neighborhood or site, green infrastructure refers to stormwater management systems that mimic nature by soaking up and storing water. These neighborhood or site-scale green infrastructure approaches are often referred to as low impact development. EPA encourages the use of green infrastructure to help manage stormwater runoff. In April 2011, EPA renewed its commitment to green infrastructure with the release of the Strategic Agenda to Protect Waters and Build More Livable Communities through Green Infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft District of Columbia Stormwater Management Guidebook Page 10 Chapter 2
    STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDEBOOK Prepared for: District Department of the Environment Watershed Protection Division District of Columbia Prepared by: Center for Watershed Protection 8390 Main Street Ellicott City, MD 21043 August 2012 i ii #!&,'!* ',$-0+2'-, 0#%0"',% $3230# 3."2#1 2- 2&# '120'!2 -$ -*3+ ' 2-0+52#0 ,%#+#,2 3'"# --) 5'** # 4'* *# 2 Q &22.S ""-#T"!T%-4 .3 *'!2'-, 12-0+52#0V%3'"# --) #-2'!#1 0#%0"',% $3230# 4#01'-,1 -$ 2&# +,3* 5'** # .-12#" 2 2&'1 5# 1'2#T $3230# 4#01'-,1 0# #6.#!2#" 2- -!!30Q 2 +-12Q -,!# 7#0T Acknowledgements A major undertaking such as this requires the dedication and cooperative efforts of many individuals. Dr. Hamid Karimi, Director of Natural Resources, Sheila Besse, Associate Director of Watershed Protection, Jeff Seltzer, Associate Director of Stormwater Management, and Timothy Karikari, Branch Chief of Technical Services each deserve credit for their overall leadership and support for this project. Their willingness to allow staff to pursue ideas to their fullest and provide necessary time, resources and managerial support, laid the foundation for much innovation. Project Manger Rebecca C. Stack, DDOE-technical services Lead Authors Greg Hoffmann, P.E., Center for Watershed Protection Rebecca C. Stack, DDOE-technical services Brian Van Wye, DDOE-stormwater Contributors and Peer Reviewers Joseph Battiata, P.E., Center for Watershed Protection Gerald Brock, Ph.D., George Washington University Josh Burch, DDOE-planning & restoration Collin R. Burrell, DDOE-water quality Walter Caldwell, DDOE-inspection enforcement Jonathan Champion, DDOE-stormwater Reid Christianson P.E., Ph.D., Center for Watershed Protection Laine Cidlowski, Office of Planning Richard DeGrandchamp, Ph.D., University of Colorado/Scientia Veritas Elias Demessie, DDOE-technical services Diane Douglas, DDOE-water quality Alex Foraste, Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long
    STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE i “A people who have not the pride to record their History will not long have virtues to make History worth recording; and Introduction no people who At the rear of Old Main at Bethany College, the sun shines through are indifferent an arcade. This passageway is filled with students today, just as it was more than a hundred years ago, as shown in a c.1885 photograph. to their past During my several visits to this college, I have lingered here enjoying the light and the student activity. It reminds me that we are part of the past need hope to as well as today. People can connect to historic resources through their make their character and setting as well as the stories they tell and the memories they make. future great.” The National Register of Historic Places recognizes historic re- sources such as Old Main. In 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office Virgil A. Lewis, first published Historic West Virginia which provided brief descriptions noted historian of our state’s National Register listings. This second edition adds approx- Mason County, imately 265 new listings, including the Huntington home of Civil Rights West Virginia activist Memphis Tennessee Garrison, the New River Gorge Bridge, Camp Caesar in Webster County, Fort Mill Ridge in Hampshire County, the Ananias Pitsenbarger Farm in Pendleton County and the Nuttallburg Coal Mining Complex in Fayette County. Each reveals the richness of our past and celebrates the stories and accomplishments of our citizens. I hope you enjoy and learn from Historic West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Warfare, Household Competency, and the Settlement of the Western Virginia Frontier, 1749 to 1794
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2007 Indian warfare, household competency, and the settlement of the western Virginia frontier, 1749 to 1794 John M. Boback West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Boback, John M., "Indian warfare, household competency, and the settlement of the western Virginia frontier, 1749 to 1794" (2007). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 2566. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/2566 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Indian Warfare, Household Competency, and the Settlement of the Western Virginia Frontier, 1749 to 1794 John M. Boback Dissertation submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor
    [Show full text]
  • Green Roofs the Basics
    Green Roofs The Basics Green roofs, or living roofs, are vegetated rooftop systems that reduce stormwater runoff by 50-60% and can triple the life expectancy of a roof. They can be installed on just about any rooftop, but require that the structure be able to withstand extra weight. Green roofs are categorized into two types, extensive and intensive. Extensive systems are thinner, with a layer of growing media that is 6” or less. Intensive roofs have a thicker growing media layer and may include trees or rooftop meadows. Due to the weight associated with intensive rooftops, they are typically only installed in new construction projects. Blue Water Baltimore wants to help you make a difference. This document provides a brief overview of green roofs and helps you complete the Project Approval Form for the Water Audit Program. Additional resources are available at www.bluewaterbaltimore.org/water-audit- resource/. Why Should I Install a Green Roof? What Does it Cost? Cost per square foot typically Extend the life of your roof ranges from $15-30 per square Improve the view from overlooking windows foot at the residential scale. If Minimize stormwater runoff the roof needs to be reinforced, the cost will be higher. Green roofs are not for everyone. A rain garden or conservation landscaping may not sound as exciting, but these are much more affordable ways to reduce stormwater runoff. When you register for the Water Audit Program, a Blue Water Baltimore staff member will conduct a site visit to assess your property. We will help you determine if a green roof is a good option for you.
    [Show full text]
  • Davis Family Langfitt and Davis British and Colonial Ancestry
    Langfitt and Davis British and Colonial Ancestry Courtesy ofFort Vance Historical Society CAMPBELL Research on.the Campbell family was done in Ohio, Brooke and Hancock Counties, W. Va., and in w·ashington County, Pa. None was done in Northern Ireland or Scotland. Not knowing the ancestors of the immigrant or the locale of their home would mak~ research there difficult. The Campbell clan in Scotland was,quite large and there were severa~ different septs of the clan. GENERATION: 1. James Campbell, the immigrant ancestor, came to America ca. ~772/73, arriving at Philadelphia. He brought with ihim his wife, Patience , and probably eight children. They had emigrated from Northern Ireland or Ulster, as it is called, to Scotland and from there to America. [HRC:205] In a court.record filed in Ohio County, Va., William Griffith deposed in 1799 that James Camp­ bell was about ~ighty years old. [CSSV Vol.II;72] According to that, if it was correct, he .was born ca. 1719. James Campbell died in Brooke County, Va., after 14 February 1804 when his will was written and before 13 July 1805 when his wife, Patience, wrote her will. Patience died in Brooke County, Va., after 13 July 1805 when her will v1as written and before November 1809 when it was probated. It is said that James Campbell was a cousin of Alexander CampbelL. Alexander and his father, Thomas, founded the Christian Church (Disciples of·. Christ) at Bethany, Va. It was at first called the Campbellite Church. Thomas was born 1763 in ' 127 LANGFri'T AND DAVIS BRITISH AND COLONIAL ANCESTRY County Down, Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia
    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Q10 Analysis Chart for Report
    Appendix K 7Q10 (Low Flow) Analysis Appendix K: 7Q10 Analysis 7Q10 MINUS AVERAGE DAILY 7Q10 DAILY DAILY MAXIMUM 7Q10 IN MINUS MAXIMUM REPORTED DECIMAL DECIMAL FACILITY NAME COUNTY POTENTIAL 7Q10 GALLONS COMMENT AVERAGE SOURCE POTENTIAL FLOW LATITUDE LONGITUDE TO PER DAY DAILY TO FROM WITHDRAW FLOW WITHDRAW SURVEY AGGREGATES QUARRY RANDOLPH 80,809 2.2870 1,478,024 1,397,215 TYGART RIVER 38.92666667 -79.90861111 ALBRIGHT POWER STATION PRESTON 248,300,000 22.5000 14,541,120 -233,758,880 1,813 14,539,307 CHEAT RIVER 39.48944444 -79.63611111 GREENBRIER RIVER AT ALDERSON WATER TREATMENT PLANT GREENBRIER 900000 12.0630 7,795,979 6,895,979 ALDERSON WV Incorrect lat. ALEX ENERGY SURFACE MINES NICHOLAS 410,400 0.0030 1,939 -408,461 and long.? TWENTY MILE CREEK 38.30027778 -81.02027778 ROBINSON FORK OF ALEX ENERGY SURFACE MINES NICHOLAS 410,400 0.0050 3,231 -407,169 42,815 -39,584 TWENTY MILE CREEK 38.32166667 -80.98194444 AMERICAN FIBER RESOURCES MARION 8,640,000 340.0000 219,732,480 211,092,480 MONONGAHELA RIVER 39.52472222 -80.12777778 EAST FORK TWELVEPOLE ARGUS ENERGY, KIAH CREEK OPERATION WAYNE 396,000 0.1920 124,084 -271,916 69,523 54,561 CREEK 38.02777778 -82.29055556 ARMSTRONG PSD FAYETTE 216,632 1,890.0000 1,221,454,080 1,221,237,448 KANAWHA RIVER BANDMILL PREPARATION PLANT LOGAN 63,000 0.1600 103,404 40,404 RUM CREEK 37.81138889 -81.87111111 BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, INSTITUTE PLANT KANAWHA 411,120,000 1,980.0000 1,279,618,560 868,498,560 KANAWHA RIVER 38.38 -81.78 BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, INSTITUTE PLANT KANAWHA 411,120,000 1,980.0000 1,279,618,560
    [Show full text]