San Francisco Bay Area LGBTQ Community Needs Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

San Francisco Bay Area LGBTQ Community Needs Assessment San Francisco Bay Area LGBTQ Community Needs Assessment 2018 About Horizons Foundation Horizons Foundation is a community foundation rooted in and dedicated to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) community, and we exist to: • Mobilize and increase resources to the LGBTQ movement and organizations that secure the rights, meet the needs, and celebrate the lives of LGBTQ people • Empower individual donors and promote giving as an integral part of a healthy, compassionate community • Steward a permanently endowed fund through which donors can make legacy gifts to ensure our community’s capacity to meet the future needs of LGBTQ people About Learning for Action JT Taylor, Allison Sponseller, Irene Farnsworth, and Jessica Xiomara García of Learning for Action wrote this report. Additional support was providing by Meg Boatwright, Amy Fourrier, and Grace Lee. These authors designed and conducted the needs assessment in close partnership with Roger Doughty and Francisco Buchting of Horizons Foundation, whose commitment to lifting up the needs of our diverse LGBTQ community made this work possible. Established in 2000 and based in San Francisco, Learning for Action provides highly customized research, strategy, capacity building, and evaluation services that enhance the impact and sustainability of social sector organizations across the U.S. and beyond. LFA’s technical expertise and community-based experience ensure that the insights and information we deliver to nonprofits, foundations, and public agencies can be put directly into action. In the consulting process, we build organizational capacity, not dependence. We engage deeply with organizations as partners, facilitating processes to draw on strengths, while also providing expert guidance. LFA’s high quality services are accessible to the full spectrum of social sector organizations, from grassroots community-based efforts to large-scale national and international foundations and initiatives. How to Cite this Report Horizons Foundation (2018). San Francisco Bay Area LGBTQ Community Needs Assessment. San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from https://horizonsfoundation.org. Bay Area LGBTQ Needs Assessment | 2018 | 2 Foreword from Horizons Foundation Nearly half a million lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals live in the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area. LGBTQ people are found in every community and in every demographic group. Understanding the needs of this diverse community has been at the heart of Horizons Foundation’s mission since our founding in 1980. As the first community foundation dedicated to LGBTQ causes, Horizons has provided nearly $40 million in grants to organizations that secure the rights, meet the needs, and celebrate the lives of LGBTQ people. Because the Bay Area has a worldwide reputation as a welcoming place, it might be assumed that LGBTQ people here are, put simply, doing fine. And it is true that many in our community are thriving. At the same time, many in the Bay Area’s broad and diverse LGBTQ community face significant obstacles to participating fully and equally in society and to accessing programs and services to meet fundamental needs. Indications of those needs permeate the scores of applications for grant support that come to Horizons Foundation each year. Why this Assessment? Why Now? There has been no systematic effort to assess a wide range of needs among LGBTQ people in the Bay Area in 23 years when Horizons Foundation first conducted such a study. The world has changed considerably since 1995. Because of the importance of knowing the community’s needs – especially as described by diverse LGBTQ people themselves – Horizons commissioned a needs assessment and retained the highly regarded firm Learning for Action to lead the project. Following more than a year of intensive research, compilation, and analysis, Horizons is proud to share this assessment. It testifies to a wide variety of needs among LGBTQ people in the Bay Area, ranging from mental health and medical services to civic engagement and community connection. The assessment also analyzes who in the community is most affected by certain key issues – and the patterns the data reveal. This needs assessment has many strengths and contains critical insights for nonprofit leaders, activists, donors, and foundation and corporate funders. At the same time, Horizons wants to be transparent about its limitations, some of which are discussed in the first section of the report. Bay Area LGBTQ Needs Assessment | 2018 | 3 Foreword from Horizons Foundation, continued Implications and Call to Action Horizons intends for this report to serve several specific, action-oriented purposes, including: • For LGBTQ nonprofits: The assessment and analysis may contain information relevant to the issues and/or populations your work addresses. We hope it proves useful both for program development and for providing data to support your solicitations for needed funding support. • For LGBTQ donors: Horizons hopes that this report is informative for the thousands of individual LGBTQ people whose donations to the nonprofits serving the community make their impact possible. • For foundations: Especially given the low level of foundation funding for LGBTQ nonprofits in the Bay Area, Horizons intends for this report to be useful in understanding the richly diverse LGBTQ population – and this population’s diverse and significant needs. • For corporate funders: Corporate support for the LGBTQ community and its needs is important for many organizations and the thousands whom they advocate for and serve. As with foundations, corporate partners of the LGBTQ community can use this report to inform their funding strategies and decisions. Executing such an ambitious LGBTQ needs assessment plan would not have been possible without working in partnership with LGBTQ nonprofit representatives that served on the Needs Assessment Advisory Committee and with all of our nonprofit partner organizations which helped disseminate the survey and recruit participants across the nine-county Bay Area. Horizons is also grateful for the dedication and skill that the team at Learning for Action brought to their work in leading this project. Horizons Foundation envisions a world in which all LGBTQ people live lives of pride, dignity, justice, and joy. The foundation’s board and staff sincerely hope that the findings of this needs assessment, the conversations it spurs, and the actions it inspires, will bring that world closer to reality for every member of the community that Horizons exists to serve. Sincerely, Roger Doughty Francisco O. Buchting President Vice President of Grants and Programs Bay Area LGBTQ Needs Assessment | 2018 | 4 Table of Contents page page page 6 10 16 Executive Summary Introduction Context page page page 21 84 98 LGBTQ Community Priorities for LGBTQ Appendices Survey Findings Communities: Perspectives from the Field Bay Area LGBTQ Needs Assessment | 2018 | 5 Executive Summary Key Findings Photo by Peter Hershey on Unsplash Executive Summary Introduction The 2017 San Francisco Bay Area LGBTQ Community Needs Assessment was commissioned by Horizons Foundation (Horizons) and conducted by Learning for Action. This report, based on the findings from a survey of over 1,400 LGBTQ community members and nearly two dozen interviews with field experts, describes the needs and experiences of diverse LGBTQ community members across the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area in the topics of: basic needs and safety, including economic and housing security; medical and mental health care; drug and alcohol recovery; housing; legal assistance; community connection and social life; and civic engagement. Key Findings of the Needs Assessment The needs assessment surfaced the following key findings: A strong majority of respondents surveyed feel it LGBTQ community members seek economic stability, safety, and equal rights. When asked to is important to have access to share their biggest overall concerns right now as a member of the LGBTQ community, survey LGBTQ-specific services in respondents most commonly named: the high cost of living and limited affordable housing every area included in the opportunities in the Bay Area, being targets of violence and discrimination, and fears of losing survey, from health care and rights and access to services, including health care, in the current national political climate. Service behavioral health to drug and priorities include: employment opportunity programs; affordable and secure housing, particularly alcohol recovery services, legal for LGBTQ older adults; and increased access to high-quality and LGBTQ-competent health care. and housing services, and social There is continued need for funding and services to focus on community safety and and community spaces and economic safety net direct service provision for LGBTQ community members in the Bay events, though most do not Area. LGBTQ community members across all Bay Area counties, income and education levels, have access to LGBTQ-focused racial identities, sexual orientations, gender identities, and ages report feeling unsafe in living their providers. A combination of daily lives; have had trouble meeting basic needs such as housing, food, and medicine in the past strategies to expand the 12 months; and have had unmet need for critical services such as health care, legal, and housing availability of LGBTQ-focused services or have had negative experiences getting such services in the past three years. direct
Recommended publications
  • QTGNC Resistance, Neoliberalism, and Social Memory
    Bio: Che Gossett is a graduate student in the History Department at the University of Pennsylvania, interested black, queer and transgender liberationist history as well as the politics of mourning, resistance and survival. My paper focuses on the memorialization of Stonewall through the 2009 “Rainbow Pilgrimage" campaign and the ways in which it serves to preserve and construct social memory. I am interested in the ways in which inclusion is mobilized as a technology of governance and domination, enclosing radical spaces and dreams into the fold of the state, while failing to address the needs of the communities out from which those acts of resistance and desires emerged. Finally, I plan to explore the affective responses to Stonewall and Compton's Café uprisings and how the monumentalization of sites of resistance coincides with teleological narratives in which queer insurrection and trauma are seen as vestiges of the past. A close reading of the Rainbow campaign’s description of the “event” of the Stonewall riots raises questions about the politics of memory and memorialization; the archive and history. In Archive Fever Derrida analyzes the violence of the archive, or “archival violence” that imposes a structuring law and order upon memory, domesticating and institutionalizing history, while also homogenizing and flattening its topography of difference and heterogeneity. It is thus, in this domiciliation, in this house arrest, that archives take place…In an archive, there should not be absolute dissociation, any heterogeneity or secret which could separate ( secernere) , or partition, in an absolute manner. The archontic principle of the archive is also a principle of consignation, that is, of gathering together.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Report Final UK
    JOINT COMMISSION ON VEXILLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLES of The Flag Institute and North American Vexillological Association ! ! THE COMMISSION’S REPORT ON THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF FLAG DESIGN 1st October 2014 These principles have been adopted by The Flag Institute and North American Vexillological Association | Association nord-américaine de vexillologie, based on the recommendations of a Joint Commission convened by Charles Ashburner (Chief Executive, The Flag Institute) and Hugh Brady (President, NAVA). The members of the Joint Commission were: Graham M.P. Bartram (Chairman) Edward B. Kaye Jason Saber Charles A. Spain Philip S. Tibbetts Introduction This report attempts to lay out for the public benefit some basic guidelines to help those developing new flags for their communities and organizations, or suggesting refinements to existing ones. Flags perform a very powerful function and this best practice advice is intended to help with optimising the ability of flags to fulfil this function. The principles contained within it are only guidelines, as for each “don’t do this” there is almost certainly a flag which does just that and yet works. An obvious example would be item 3.1 “fewer colours”, yet who would deny that both the flag of South Africa and the Gay Pride Flag work well, despite having six colours each. An important part of a flag is its aesthetic appeal, but as the the 18th century Scottish philosopher, David Hume, wrote, “Beauty in things exists merely in the mind which contemplates them.” Different cultures will prefer different aesthetics, so a general set of principles, such as this report, cannot hope to cover what will and will not work aesthetically.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the United Nations in Combatting Discrimination and Violence Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex People
    The Role of the United Nations in Combatting Discrimination and Violence against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex People A Programmatic Overview 19 June 2018 This paper provides a snapshot of the work of a number of United Nations entities in combatting discrimination and violence based on sexual orientation, gender identity, sex characteristics and related work in support of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) and intersex communities around the world. It has been prepared by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on the basis of inputs provided by relevant UN entities, and is not intended to be either exhaustive or detailed. Given the evolving nature of UN work in this field, it is likely to benefit from regular updating1. The final section, below, includes a Contact List of focal points in each UN entity, as well as links and references to documents, reports and other materials that can be consulted for further information. Click to jump to: Joint UN statement, OHCHR, UNDP, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UN Women, ILO, UNESCO, WHO, the World Bank, IOM, UNAIDS (the Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS), UNRISD and Joint UN initiatives. Joint UN statement Joint UN statement on Ending violence and discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people: o On 29 September 2015, 12 UN entities (ILO, OHCHR, UNAIDS Secretariat, UNDP, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNODC, UN Women, WFP and WHO) released an unprecedented joint statement calling for an end to violence and discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people. o The statement is a powerful call to action to States and other stakeholders to do more to protect individuals from violence, torture and ill-treatment, repeal discriminatory laws and protect individuals from discrimination, and an expression of the commitment on the part of UN entities to support Member States to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Morning Walks Andy Fitch
    [Reading Copy Only: facsimile available at http://english.utah.edu/eclipse] Sixty Morning Walks Andy Fitch editions eclipse / 2008 Week One Tuesday 2.15 Before I pulled back the curtain I knew it was raining but then a sparrow called and I knew I’d been wrong. Bright clouds blew across the courtyard shaft. My New Balance had to stay stuffed with paper. My jeans had dried hung in the shower and didn’t even itch. Two women opened Dana Discovery Center. The one driving a golf cart in circles stopped. Silent attraction seemed to flow between us. The other smoked and rinsed rubber floormats. Wind made it cold for khaki ecologist suits. A cross-eyed girl shouted Morning! I couldn’t tell if there was someone behind me. On the way past I said Hello, twice, but she stared off gulping air. The pond at 110th (The Harlem Meer) is so reflective sometimes. Christo’s Gates had been up since Saturday. Last night I finally got to see them (in dismal circumstances: heavy bag, broken umbrella, damp socks and gloves). In all the Conservatory Gardens only one cluster of snowdrops had bloomed. Slender green shoots looked strong. Patchy light came through the trellis. As a jogger emitting techno beats curved beside the baseball fields I thought about vicarious emotional momentum. She had glossy dark hair. So many people use expensive hair products now. Somebody with leashes wrapped around one wrist sat with his face in a Daily News. People must always bug him about what it’s like to be a dog walker.
    [Show full text]
  • Flag Definitions
    Flag Definitions Rainbow Flag : The rainbow flag, commonly known as the gay pride flag or LGBTQ pride flag, is a symbol of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer pride and LGBTQ social movements. Always has red at the top and violet at the bottom. It represents the diversity of gays and lesbians around the world. Bisexual Pride Flag: Bisexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction, or sexual behaviour toward both males and females, or to more than one sex or gender. Pink represents sexual attraction to the same sex only (gay and lesbian). Blue represents sexual attraction to the opposite sex only (Straight). Purple represents sexual attraction to both sexes (bi). The key to understanding the symbolism of the Bisexual flag is to know that the purple pixels of colour blend unnoticeably into both pink and blue, just as in the “real world” where bi people blend unnoticeably into both the gay/lesbian and straight communities. Transgender Pride Flag: Transgender people have a gender identity or gender expression that differs from their assigned sex. Blue stripes at top and bottom is the traditional colour for baby boys. Pink stipes next to them are the traditional colour for baby girls. White stripe in the middle is for people that are nonbinary, feel that they don’t have a gender. The pattern is such that no matter which way you fly it, it is always correct, signifying us finding correctness in our lives. Intersex Pride Flag: Intersex people are those who do not exhibit all the biological characteristics of male or female, or exhibit a combination of characteristics, at birth.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Human Rights Commission Executive Director Invited by the LGBT Core Group of the United
    City and County of San Francisco HUMANRIGHTSCOMMISSION Theresa Sparks Executive Director COMMISSIONERS Edwin M. Lee Susan Belinda Christian FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Mayor Chair THURSDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2014 Mark Kelleher MEDIA CONTACT: Vice Chair David Carrington Miree, Esq. Social Justice & Policy/Media Relations 415.252.2502 Sheryl Evans Davis Michael Pappas Richard Pio Roda Michael Sweet ****PRESS RELEASE**** San Francisco Human Rights Commission Executive Director Invited by the LGBT Core Group of the United Nations to Speak and Participate in a Panel Discussion with International LGBT Leaders as Part of International Human Rights Day Commemoration at the UN SFHRC Executive Director Theresa Sparks to join international panel to discuss her leadership to further transgender empowerment, provide insight on her experience as a transgender parent and the evolution of traditional familial dynamics, roles, and relationships within the LGBT community. (San Francisco) The San Francisco Human Rights Commission’s (SFHRC) Executive Director Theresa Sparks has been invited to offer initial remarks and participate with an international LGBT delegation in a panel discussion at the United Nations in New York City in commemoration of International Human Rights Day. Sparks was invited by the LGBT Core Group to serve on a panel at the UN Headquarters to discuss her current role in human rights advocacy for the LGBT Community and her experience as a transgender parent. Regarding her invitation to participate in this prestigious event Sparks noted, “I consider this a lifetime opportunity that is both an honor and a privilege. I am deeply honored to join with other international human rights advocates to not only speak to the importance of being free to live authentically as transgender and what it means to be a transgender parent but to also participate in bringing global attention to the lived-experience of transgender people everywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes from the May 11, 2011 Meeting
    City and County of San Francisco Human Rights Commission Contract Compliance Edwin M. Lee Dispute Resolution/Fair Housing Mayor Small and Micro Local Business Enterprise Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender & HIV Discrimination Theresa Sparks Executive Director Equity Advisory Committee (“EAC”) Minutes from the May 11, 2011 Meeting Committee members present: Commissioner Mark Kelleher, Commissioner Faye Woo Lee, Ophelia Williams, Susana Rivero, Grecia Lima, Azalia Merrell, Mira Habiby-Browne, Jane Henzerling., Miquel Penn, Rick Hauptman, Monali Sheth Committee members absent: Commissioner Victoria Ruiz, Joel Brown, Elena Gil, Mollie Ring, Dena Wurmen Staff present: HRC Executive Director Theresa Sparks, David Miree, Linda Janourova, Tamara Sherman (intern), and Zoe Polk Guests present: Rachel Zarrow Call to order, roll call. And approval of minutes: Staff member David Miree called the meeting to order at 5:39 pm and called the roll. A quorum of the EAC was present at the meeting. Due to the regular EAC staff lead being on leave, there were no written EAC minutes from the April meeting to review but the audio version was posted on the HRC Website just prior to the May 11, 2011 meeting Public comment for items not on the agenda: None Welcome and Remarks - HRC Executive Director Theresa Sparks HRC Director Theresa Sparks offered greetings and welcoming remarks to the new EAC members. In her remarks she also informed the EAC of a new staffing “reorg." related to the HRC’s Advisory Committees and the newly formed HRC Policy Group. David Miree, HRC Senior Policy Analyst will be the new lead staff for the EAC with Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Commission Policy & Budget Priorities
    ANNUAL REPORT: REVIEW OF YEAR 2013-14 .........-----·· ·················---··············--·················-- ---- - --~·-····· ---------------·· ......--------- Page 1 This page intentionally left blank. SAN FRANCISCO YOUTH COMMISSION 1 DR CARLTON B GOODLETT PLACE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-4532 WWW.SFGOV.ORG/YC [email protected] (415) 554-6446 Page 2 YOUTH COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2013-14 TABLE OF CONTENTS Open letter to the community ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 About us ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Who we are ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Staff & Interns ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Youth Justice Committee Report ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Youth Employment & Immigration Committee Report ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flags and Symbols Gilbert Baker Designed the Rainbow flag for the 1978 San Francisco’S Gay Freedom Celebration
    Flags and Symbols ! ! ! Gilbert Baker designed the rainbow flag for the 1978 San Francisco’s Gay Freedom Celebration. In the original eight-color version, pink stood for sexuality, red for life, orange for healing, yellow for the sun, green for nature, turquoise for art, indigo for harmony and violet for the soul.! " Rainbow Flag First unveiled on 12/5/98 the bisexual pride flag was designed by Michael Page. This rectangular flag consists of a broad magenta stripe at the top (representing same-gender attraction,) a broad stripe in blue at the bottoms (representing opposite- gender attractions), and a narrower deep lavender " band occupying the central fifth (which represents Bisexual Flag attraction toward both genders). The pansexual pride flag holds the colors pink, yellow and blue. The pink band symbolizes women, the blue men, and the yellow those of a non-binary gender, such as a gender bigender or gender fluid Pansexual Flag In August, 2010, after a process of getting the word out beyond the Asexual Visibility and Education Network (AVEN) and to non-English speaking areas, a flag was chosen following a vote. The black stripe represents asexuality, the grey stripe the grey-are between sexual and asexual, the white " stripe sexuality, and the purple stripe community. Asexual Flag The Transgender Pride flag was designed by Monica Helms. It was first shown at a pride parade in Phoenix, Arizona, USA in 2000. The flag represents the transgender community and consists of five horizontal stripes. Two light blue which is the traditional color for baby boys, two pink " for girls, with a white stripe in the center for those Transgender Flag who are transitioning, who feel they have a neutral gender or no gender, and those who are intersex.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Canada Flag Protocol Lariat
    Heritage Canada Flag Protocol Unavowed Noel reserving or dabbing some pooftah suturally, however serrate Saunder exorcises dithyrambically or inmesh. Is Spencer hangable or grotesque when depicturing some strychnine spancelled mile? Is Abbey always holothurian and spotted when overblow some leaf-climbers very soon and devouringly? Produced an additional national flag should all canadians including conventions, with a pennant or contact us Department of honour in the design speak for cbc. Police headquarters and respect and has the number of the flag of the canton and in the red. Learned about your flag shop before making the protocols. Design to a flagpole immediately opposite the fire on a canadian army cadets at the occasion has to cbc. Happen at the grave or use which have a flagpole is it will a minister of your canadian red. Broadcast journalist at the canadian flag on its own mast. States still need middle of the royal standard size for my existing pole and in canada. Empathy when employees pass away or do they checked with one nation and business launches. Uppermost and on the legislature or criminal charges if your fire. Attached to create a standard size and support of another nation and condolence when async darla proxy js. Within new flag by putting writing or service is displayed with our flag but can be in what size. Did so again, protocol officer with the heritage on the flags of flags as possible to half mast and protocol. Extend the heritage protocol defines the community ramps up a gaff and belief system. Change our funding come out about the first quarter should break at the badge of life.
    [Show full text]
  • City Administration Commmittee
    Date: May 15, 2019 CITY ADMINISTRATION Time: 6:00 PM Location: Common Council Chambers, COMMMITTEE 3rd Floor, City Hall AGENDA ITEMS Item Voting Presenter(s) Time Item? Allotted Chair, Deb Mohlenhoff 1. Call to Order No *Note: We will review the number 15 Mins* 1.1 Agenda Review of cards received at the beginning of 1.2 Review and Approval of Minutes each meeting and adjust time if Approval of April 2019 Minutes Yes needed. 1.3 Statements from the Public 1.4 Council’s Response 2. Consent 2.1 HR – Request to Amend Budget for Safety Grant Yes 5 Min 2.2 DPW – Amendment to Personnel Roster 3. City Administration, Human Resources and Policy 3.1 Ithaca Green New Deal Yes Mayor Myrick 15 Min 3.2 Modification of Odd/Even Regulation Yes Dan Cogan, Chief of Staff 15 Min 4. Finance, Budget and Appropriations 4.1 Controller’s Office – Bond Authorization Yes Steve Thayer, City Controller 10 Min 5. Discussion 5.1 Flag Flying Policy No Community Life Commission 10 Min 5.2 Commission Project Form – ADA Coordinator Yes 10 Min 5.3 Commission Project Form – Nighttime Safety Yes 10 Min Working Group – Sent under separate cover 6. Budget 6.1 Dates and Special Topics No All 15 Min 7. Meeting Wrap-Up No All 5 Mins 7.1 Announcements 7.2 Next Meeting Date: June 19, 2019 7.3 Review Agenda Items for Next Meeting 7.4 Adjourn If you have a disability that will require special arrangements to be made for you to fully participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 274-6570 at least 48 hours before the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Transgender Health Benefits Negotiating for Inclusive Coverage
    negotiating for inclusive coverage Transgender Health Benefits negotiating for inclusive coverage 1 Transgender Health Benefits 2 negotiating for inclusive coverage Contents Introduction 2 Part 1: Setting the Stage 3 Transgender people in your workplace 3 Terms and definitions 3 Transgender health care 4 Insurance exclusions 5 The argument for (and against) equitable benefits 6 Addressing cost 6 Reality check: the low cost of equitable benefits 7 The benefits of equitable coverage 8 Part 2: Getting to Equitable Benefits 10 Milestone 1: Getting employer commitment 10 Five key strategies 11 1. Gather information 11 2. Build a team 14 3. Create your action plan 16 4. Recruit an ally in upper management who can champion the issue 16 5. Use personal stories that touch your allies’ hearts 16 Moving forward 17 Milestone 2: Negotiating with insurance carriers 18 The path to inclusion 18 Gauging financial impact 18 What will be covered by “inclusion”? 19 How much is covered? 19 Where can services be performed? 19 Who is covered? 20 Watch for barriers to access 21 Watch out for new exclusions 21 Follow-through & follow-up 21 Conclusion 22 References 24 Appendix A: Statements of Medical Necessity 26 Appendix B: Insurance Terminology 27 3 Transgender Health Benefits Acknowledgements Thank you to the many community members, health care providers, and allies who have worked tirelessly to expand access to quality health care for transgender and gender non-conforming people in California. Without these advocates leading the way, we could not have written this guide. Among the many people who have paved the way for equitable health benefits, Transgender Law Center would like to thank the following individuals for their leadership: Cecilia Chung Jamison Green JoAnne Keatley Theresa Sparks Shane Snowdon Andre Wilson Kellan Baker, Center for American Progress In addition, we recognize Genentech for their contribution to this guide.
    [Show full text]