DOCSLIB.ORG

Filters and Attenuators

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Filters and Attenuators Filters and Attenuators 17.1 CLASSIFICATION OF FILTERS Wave filters were first invented by G.A Campbell and O.I. Lobel of the Bell Telephone Laboratories. A filter is a reactive network that freely passes the desired bands of frequencies while almost totally suppressing all other bands. A filter is constructed from purely reactive elements, for otherwise the attenuation would never becomes zero in the pass band of the filter network. Filters differ from simple resonant circuits in providing a substantially constant transmission over the band which they accept; this band may lie between any limits depending on the design. Ideally, filters should produce CHAPTER 17 no attenuation in the desired band, called the transmission band or pass band, and should provide total or infinite attenuation at all other frequencies, called attenuation band or stop band. The frequency which separates the transmission band and the attenuation band is defined as the cut-off frequency of the wave filters, and is designated by fc. Filter networks are widely used in communication systems to separate various voice channels in carrier frequency telephone circuits. Filters also find applications in instrumentation, telemetering equipment, etc. where it is necessary to transmit or attenuate a limited range of frequencies. A filter may, in principle, have any number of pass bands separated by attenuation bands. However, they are classified into four common types, viz. low pass, high pass, band pass and band elimination. Decibel and Neper The attenuation of a wave filter can be expressed in decibels or nepers. Neper is defined as the natural logarithm of the ratio of input voltage (or current) to the output voltage (or current), provided that the network is properly terminated in its characteristic impedance Z0. From Fig. 17.1 (a) the number of V1 I1 nepers, N = loge or loge . V2 I2 A neper can also be expressed in terms of input power, P1 and the output Fig. 17.1 (a) power P2 as N 5 1/2 loge P1/P2. Filters and Attenuators 811 A decibel is defined as ten times the common logarithms of the ratio of the input power to the output power. P1 ∴ Decibel D =10 log10 P2 The decibel can be expressed in terms of the ratio of input voltage (or current) and the output voltage (or current.) V1 I1 D = 20 log10 = 20 log10 V2 I2 ∴ One decibel is equal to 0.115 N. Low Pass Filter By definition, a low pass (LP) filter is one which passes without attenuation all frequencies up to the cut-off frequency fc, and attenuates all other frequencies greater than fc. The attenuation characteristic of an ideal LP filter is shown in Fig. 17.1 (b). This transmits currents of all frequencies from zero up to the cut-off frequency. The band is called pass band or transmission band. Thus, the pass band for the LP filter is the frequency range 0 to fc. The frequency range over which transmission does not take place is called the stop band or attenuation band. The stop band for a LP filter is the frequency range above fc. Fig. 17.1 (b) High Pass Filter A high pass (HP) filter attenuates all frequencies below a designated cut-off frequency, fc, and passes all frequencies above fc. Thus the pass band of this filter is the frequency range above fc, and the stop band is the frequency range below fc. The attenuation characteristic of a HP filter is shown in Fig. 17.1 (b). 812 Circuits and Networks Band Pass Filter A band pass filter passes frequencies between two designated cut-off frequencies and attenuates all other frequencies. It is abbreviated as BP filter. As shown in Fig. 17.1 (b), a BP filter has two cut-off frequencies and will have the pass band f2 – f1; f1 is called the lower cut-off frequency, while f2 is called the upper cut-off frequency. Band Elimination Filter A band elimination filter passes all frequencies lying outside a certain range, while it attenuates all frequencies between the two designated frequencies. It is also referred as band stop filter. The characteristic of an ideal band elimination filter is shown in Fig. 17.1 (b). All frequencies between f1 and f2 will be attenuated while frequencies below f1 and above f2 will be passed. 17.2 FILTER NETWORKS Ideally a filter should have zero attenuation in the pass band. This condition can only be satisfied if the elements of the filter are dissipationless, which cannot be realized in practice. Filters are designed with an assumption that the elements of the filters are purely reactive. Filters are made of symmetrical T, or p sections. T and p sections can be considered as combinations of unsymmetrical L sections as shown in Fig. 17.2. Fig. 17.2 The ladder structure is one of the commonest forms of filter network. A cascade connection of several T and p sections constitutes a ladder network. A common form of the ladder network is shown in Fig. 17.3. Figure 17.3 (a) represents a T section ladder network, whereas Fig. 17.3 (b) represents the p section ladder network. It can be observed that both networks are identical except at the ends. Filters and Attenuators 813 Fig. 17.3 17.3 EQUATIONS OF FILTER NETWORKS The study of the behaviour of any filter requires the calculation of its propagation constant g, attenuation a, phase shift b and its characteristic impedance Z0. T-Network Consider a symmetrical T-network as shown in Fig. 17.4. As has already been mentioned in Section 16.13, if the image impedances at port 1-19 and port 2-29 are equal to each other, the image impedance is then called the characteristic, or the iterative impedance, Z0. Thus, if the network in Fig. 17.4 is terminated in Z0, its input impedance will also be Z0. The value Fig. 17.4 of input impedance for the T-network when it is terminated in Z0 is given by Z Z 1 + Z Z 2 2 0 Z =1 + in 2 Z 1 +ZZ + 2 2 0 also Zin= Z 0 Z1 2Z2 + Z0 Z1 22 ∴ Z0 = + 2 ZZZ1+2 2 + 2 0 Z1 (ZZZZ1 2+ 2 2 0 ) Z0 = + 2 ZZZ1+2 2 + 2 0 814 Circuits and Networks 2 ZZZZZZZZZ1 +21 2 + 2 1 0 + 2 1 2 + 4 0 2 Z0 = 2(ZZZ1+ 2 2 + 2 0 ) 2 2 4ZZZZ0 =1 + 4 1 2 Z 2 Z 2 =1 + ZZ 00 4 1 2 The characteristic impedance of a symmetrical T-section is Z 2 Z =1 + ZZ (17.1) 0T 4 1 2 Z0T can also be expressed in terms of open circuit impedance Z0c and short circuit impedance Zsc of the T-network. From Fig. 17.4, the open circuit impedance Z Z =1 + Z and 0c 2 2 Z 1 Z Z × 2 Z =1 + 2 sc 2 Z 1 + Z 2 2 2 ZZZ1 + 4 1 2 Zsc = 2ZZ1+ 4 2 Z 2 ZZZZ× = + 1 0c sc 1 2 4 2 = ZZ0T or Z0T= Z 0 c Z sc (17.2) Propagation Constant of T-Network By definition the propagation constant g of the network in Fig. 17.5 is given by g 5 loge I1/I2 Writing the mesh equation for the 2nd mesh, we get Z IZI= 1 +ZZ + 1 2 2 2 2 0 Z 1 ZZ I +2 + 0 1 = 2 = eg I2 Z2 Fig. 17.5 Z ∴ 1 +Z + Z = Z eg 2 2 0 2 Z Z= Z() eg −1 − 1 (17.3) 0 2 2 Filters and Attenuators 815 The characteristic impedance of a T-network is given by Z 2 Z =1 + ZZ (17.4) 0T 4 1 2 Squaring Eqs 17.3 and 17.4 and subtracting Eq. 17.4 from Eq. 17.3, we get Z 2 Z 2 Z2() eg −1 2 +1 −Z Z() eg −1 −1 −ZZ = 0 2 4 1 2 4 1 2 2g 2 g Z2 ()( e−1 − Z1 Z 2 1 + e −−1) = 0 2g 2 g Z2 () e−1 − Z1 Z 2 e = 0 g 2 g Z2 () e−1 − Z1 e = 0 Z eg ()eg −1 2 = 1 Z2 Z e2g+1 − 2 e g = 1 −g Z2 e Rearranging the above equation, we have −g2 g g Z1 e( e+1 − 2 e ) = Z2 g− g Z1 (e+ e −2) = Z2 Dividing both sides by 2, we have eg+ e− g Z =1 + 1 2 2Z2 Z cosh g =1 + 1 (17.5) 2Z2 Still another expression may be obtained for the complex propagation constant in terms of the hyperbolic tangent rather than hyperbolic cosine. 2 sinhg= cos h g −1 Z 2 Z Z 2 =1 + 1 −1 =1 + 1 2Z2 Z1 2Z2 2 1 Z1 Z0T sinh g =ZZ1 2 + = (17.6) Z2 4 Z2 Dividing Eq. 17.6 by Eq. 17.5, we get Z tanh g = 0T Z Z + 1 2 2 816 Circuits and Networks Z But Z +1 = Z 2 2 0c Also from Eq. 17.2, ZZZ0T= 0 c sc Z tanh g = sc Z 0c g 1 Also sinh= (coshg −1 ) 2 2 Where coshg =1 + (ZZ1/ 2 2 ) Z = 1 (17.7) 4Z2 p-Network Consider asymmetrical p-section shown in Fig. 17.6. When the network is terminated in Z0 at port 2-29, its input impedance is given by 2ZZ 2ZZ + 2 0 2 1 2ZZ2+ 0 Zin = 2ZZ2 0 Z1 + + 2Z2 2ZZ2+ 0 By definition of characteristic impedance, Zin 5 Z0 2ZZ 2ZZ + 2 0 Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RF Coils, Helical Resonators and Voltage Magnification by Coherent Spatial Modes
    TELSIKS 2001, University of Nis, Yugoslavia (September 19-21, 2001) and MICROWAVE REVIEW 1 RF Coils, Helical Resonators and Voltage Magnification by Coherent Spatial Modes K.L. Corum* and J.F. Corum** “Is there, I ask, can there be, a more interesting study than that of alternating currents.” Nikola Tesla, (Life Fellow, and 1892 Vice President of the AIEE)1 Abstract – By modeling a wire-wound coil as an anisotropically II. CYLINDRICAL HELICES conducting cylindrical boundary, one may start from Maxwell’s equations and deduce the structure’s resonant behavior. Not A. Problem Formulation only can the propagation factor and characteristic impedance be determined for such a helically disposed surface waveguide, but also its resonances, “self-capacitance” (so-called), and its voltage A uniform helix is described by its radius (r = a), its pitch magnification by standing waves. Further, the Tesla coil passes (or turn-to-turn wire spacing "s"), and its pitch angle ψ, to a conventional lumped element inductor as the helix is which is the angle that the tangent to the helix makes with a electrically shortened. plane perpendicular to the axis of the structure (z). Geometrically, ψ = cot-1(2πa/s). The wave equation is not Keywords – coil, helix, surface wave, resonator, inductor, Tesla. separable in helical coordinates and there exists no rigorous 3 solution of Maxwell's equations for the solenoidal helix. I. INTRODUCTION However, at radio frequencies a wire-wound helix with many turns per free-space wavelength (e.g., a Tesla coil) One of the more significant challenges in electrical may be modeled as an idealized anisotropically conducting cylindrical surface that conducts only in the helical science is that of constricting a great deal of insulated conductor into a compact spatial volume and determining direction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self-Resonance and Self-Capacitance of Solenoid Coils: Applicable Theory, Models and Calculation Methods
    1 The self-resonance and self-capacitance of solenoid coils: applicable theory, models and calculation methods. By David W Knight1 Version2 1.00, 4th May 2016. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1472.0887 Abstract The data on which Medhurst's semi-empirical self-capacitance formula is based are re-analysed in a way that takes the permittivity of the coil-former into account. The updated formula is compared with theories attributing self-capacitance to the capacitance between adjacent turns, and also with transmission-line theories. The inter-turn capacitance approach is found to have no predictive power. Transmission-line behaviour is corroborated by measurements using an induction loop and a receiving antenna, and by visualising the electric field using a gas discharge tube. In-circuit solenoid self-capacitance determinations show long-coil asymptotic behaviour corresponding to a wave propagating along the helical conductor with a phase-velocity governed by the local refractive index (i.e., v = c if the medium is air). This is consistent with measurements of transformer phase error vs. frequency, which indicate a constant time delay. These observations are at odds with the fact that a long solenoid in free space will exhibit helical propagation with a frequency-dependent phase velocity > c. The implication is that unmodified helical-waveguide theories are not appropriate for the prediction of self-capacitance, but they remain applicable in principle to open- circuit systems, such as Tesla coils, helical resonators and loaded vertical antennas, despite poor agreement with actual measurements. A semi-empirical method is given for predicting the first self- resonance frequencies of free coils by treating the coil as a helical transmission-line terminated by its own axial-field and fringe-field capacitances.
    [Show full text]
  • Ec6503 - Transmission Lines and Waveguides Transmission Lines and Waveguides Unit I - Transmission Line Theory 1
    EC6503 - TRANSMISSION LINES AND WAVEGUIDES TRANSMISSION LINES AND WAVEGUIDES UNIT I - TRANSMISSION LINE THEORY 1. Define – Characteristic Impedance [M/J–2006, N/D–2006] Characteristic impedance is defined as the impedance of a transmission line measured at the sending end. It is given by 푍 푍0 = √ ⁄푌 where Z = R + jωL is the series impedance Y = G + jωC is the shunt admittance 2. State the line parameters of a transmission line. The line parameters of a transmission line are resistance, inductance, capacitance and conductance. Resistance (R) is defined as the loop resistance per unit length of the transmission line. Its unit is ohms/km. Inductance (L) is defined as the loop inductance per unit length of the transmission line. Its unit is Henries/km. Capacitance (C) is defined as the shunt capacitance per unit length between the two transmission lines. Its unit is Farad/km. Conductance (G) is defined as the shunt conductance per unit length between the two transmission lines. Its unit is mhos/km. 3. What are the secondary constants of a line? The secondary constants of a line are 푍 i. Characteristic impedance, 푍0 = √ ⁄푌 ii. Propagation constant, γ = α + jβ 4. Why the line parameters are called distributed elements? The line parameters R, L, C and G are distributed over the entire length of the transmission line. Hence they are called distributed parameters. They are also called primary constants. The infinite line, wavelength, velocity, propagation & Distortion line, the telephone cable 5. What is an infinite line? [M/J–2012, A/M–2004] An infinite line is a line where length is infinite.
    [Show full text]
  • Constant K High Pass Filter
    Constant k High Pass Filter Presentation by: S.KARTHIE Assistant Professor/ECE SSN College of Engineering Objective At the end of this section students will be able to understand, • What is a constant k high pass filter section • Characteristic impedance, attenuation and phase constant of high pass filters. • Design equations of high pass filters. High Pass Ladder Networks • A high-pass network arranged as a ladder is shown below. • As mentioned earlier, the repetitive network may be considered as a number of T or ∏ sections in cascade . C C C CC LL L L High Pass Ladder Networks • A T section may be taken from the ladder by removing ABED, producing the high-pass filter section as shown below. AB C CC 2C 2C 2C 2C LL L L D E High Pass Ladder Networks • Similarly, a ∏ section may be taken from the ladder by removing FGHI, producing the high- pass filter section as shown below. F G CCC 2L 2L 2L 2L I H Constant- K High Pass Filter • Constant k HPF is obtained by interchanging Z 1 and Z 2. 1 Z1 === & Z 2 === jωωωL jωωωC L 2 • Also, Z 1 Z 2 === === R k is satisfied. C Constant- K High Pass Filter • The HPF filter sections are 2C 2C C L 2L 2L Constant- K High Pass Filter Reactance curve X Z2 fC f Z1 Z1= -4Z 2 Stopband Passband Constant- K High Pass Filter • The cutoff frequency is 1 fC === 4πππ LC • The characteristic impedance of T and ∏ high pass filters sections are R k 2 Oπππ fC Z === ZOT === R k 1 −−− f 2 f 2 1 −−− C f 2 Constant- K High Pass Filter Characteristic impedance curves ZO ZOπ Nominal R k Impedance ZOT fC Frequency Stopband Passband Constant- K High Pass Filter • The attenuation and phase constants are fC fC ααα === 2cosh −−−1 βββ === −−− 2sin −−−1 f f f C f f ααα −−−πππ f C f βββ f Constant- K High Pass Filter Design equations • The expression for Inductance and Capacitance is obtained using cutoff frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • Classic Filters There Are 4 Classic Analogue Filter Types: Butterworth, Chebyshev, Elliptic and Bessel. There Is No Ideal Filter
    Classic Filters There are 4 classic analogue filter types: Butterworth, Chebyshev, Elliptic and Bessel. There is no ideal filter; each filter is good in some areas but poor in others. • Butterworth: Flattest pass-band but a poor roll-off rate. • Chebyshev: Some pass-band ripple but a better (steeper) roll-off rate. • Elliptic: Some pass- and stop-band ripple but with the steepest roll-off rate. • Bessel: Worst roll-off rate of all four filters but the best phase response. Filters with a poor phase response will react poorly to a change in signal level. Butterworth The first, and probably best-known filter approximation is the Butterworth or maximally-flat response. It exhibits a nearly flat passband with no ripple. The rolloff is smooth and monotonic, with a low-pass or high- pass rolloff rate of 20 dB/decade (6 dB/octave) for every pole. Thus, a 5th-order Butterworth low-pass filter would have an attenuation rate of 100 dB for every factor of ten increase in frequency beyond the cutoff frequency. It has a reasonably good phase response. Figure 1 Butterworth Filter Chebyshev The Chebyshev response is a mathematical strategy for achieving a faster roll-off by allowing ripple in the frequency response. As the ripple increases (bad), the roll-off becomes sharper (good). The Chebyshev response is an optimal trade-off between these two parameters. Chebyshev filters where the ripple is only allowed in the passband are called type 1 filters. Chebyshev filters that have ripple only in the stopband are called type 2 filters , but are are seldom used.
    [Show full text]
  • Modal Propagation and Excitation on a Wire-Medium Slab
    1112 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 56, NO. 5, MAY 2008 Modal Propagation and Excitation on a Wire-Medium Slab Paolo Burghignoli, Senior Member, IEEE, Giampiero Lovat, Member, IEEE, Filippo Capolino, Senior Member, IEEE, David R. Jackson, Fellow, IEEE, and Donald R. Wilton, Life Fellow, IEEE Abstract—A grounded wire-medium slab has recently been shown to support leaky modes with azimuthally independent propagation wavenumbers capable of radiating directive omni- directional beams. In this paper, the analysis is generalized to wire-medium slabs in air, extending the omnidirectionality prop- erties to even modes, performing a parametric analysis of leaky modes by varying the geometrical parameters of the wire-medium lattice, and showing that, in the long-wavelength regime, surface modes cannot be excited at the interface between the air and wire medium. The electric field excited at the air/wire-medium interface by a horizontal electric dipole parallel to the wires is also studied by deriving the relevant Green’s function for the homogenized slab model. When the near field is dominated by a leaky mode, it is found to be azimuthally independent and almost perfectly linearly polarized. This result, which has not been previ- ously observed in any other leaky-wave structure for a single leaky mode, is validated through full-wave moment-method simulations of an actual wire-medium slab with a finite size. Index Terms—Leaky modes, metamaterials, near field, planar Fig. 1. (a) Wire-medium slab in air with the relevant coordinate axes. (b) Transverse view of the wire-medium slab with the relevant geometrical slab, wire medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Loudspeaker Parameters
    Loudspeaker Parameters D. G. Meyer School of Electrical & Computer Engineering Outline • Review of How Loudspeakers Work • Small Signal Loudspeaker Parameters • Effect of Loudspeaker Cable • Sample Loudspeaker • Electrical Power Needed • Sealed Box Design Example How Loudspeakers Work How Loudspeakers Are Made Fundamental Small Signal Mechanical Parameters 2 • Sd – projected area of driver diaphragm (m ) • Mms – mass of diaphragm (kg) • Cms – compliance of driver’s suspension (m/N) • Rms – mechanical resistance of driver’s suspension (N•s/m) • Le – voice coil inductance (mH) • Re – DC resistance of voice coil ( Ω) • Bl – product of magnetic field strength in voice coil gap and length of wire in magnetic field (T•m) Small Signal Parameters These values can be determined by measuring the input impedance of the driver, near the resonance frequency, at small input levels for which the mechanical behavior of the driver is effectively linear. • Fs – (free air) resonance frequency of driver (Hz) – frequency at which the combination of the energy stored in the moving mass and suspension compliance is maximum, which results in maximum cone velocity – usually it is less efficient to produce output frequencies below F s – input signals significantly below F s can result in large excursions – typical factory tolerance for F s spec is ±15% Measurement of Loudspeaker Free-Air Resonance Small Signal Parameters These values can be determined by measuring the input impedance of the driver, near the resonance frequency, at small input levels for which the
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristic Impedance of Lines on Printed Boards by TDR 03/04
    Number 2.5.5.7 ASSOCIATION CONNECTING Subject ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES ® Characteristic Impedance of Lines on Printed 2215 Sanders Road Boards by TDR Northbrook, IL 60062-6135 Date Revision 03/04 A IPC-TM-650 Originating Task Group TEST METHODS MANUAL TDR Test Method Task Group (D-24a) 1 Scope This document describes time domain reflectom- b. The value of characteristic impedance obtained from TDR etry (TDR) methods for measuring and calculating the charac- measurements is traceable to a national metrology insti- teristic impedance, Z0, of a transmission line on a printed cir- tute, such as the National Institute of Standards and Tech- cuit board (PCB). In TDR, a signal, usually a step pulse, is nology (NIST), through coaxial air line standards. The char- injected onto a transmission line and the Z0 of the transmis- acteristic impedance of these transmission line standards sion line is determined from the amplitude of the pulse is calculated from their measured dimensional and material reflected at the TDR/transmission line interface. The incident parameters. step and the time delayed reflected step are superimposed at the point of measurement to produce a voltage versus time c. A variety of methods for TDR measurements each have waveform. This waveform is the TDR waveform and contains different accuracies and repeatabilities. information on the Z0 of the transmission line connected to the d. If the nominal impedance of the line(s) being measured is TDR unit. significantly different from the nominal impedance of the Note: The signals used in the TDR system are actually rect- measurement system (typically 50 Ω), the accuracy and angular pulses but, because the duration of the TDR wave- repeatability of the measured numerical valued will be form is much less than pulse duration, the TDR pulse appears degraded.
    [Show full text]
  • Cmos-Based Amplitude and Phase Control Circuits Designed for Multi
    CMOS-BASED AMPLITUDE AND PHASE CONTROL CIRCUITS DESIGNED FOR MULTI-STANDARD WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty by Yan-Yu Huang In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology August 2011 Copyright© Yan-Yu Huang 2011 CMOS-BASED AMPLITUDE AND PHASE CONTROL CIRCUITS DESIGNED FOR MULTI-STANDARD WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Approved by: Dr. J. Stevenson Kenney, Advisor Dr. Thomas G. Habetler School of Electrical and Computer School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Kevin T. Kornegay Dr. Paul A. Kohl School of Electrical and Computer School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Chang-Ho Lee Date Approved: June 29, 2011 School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to my advisor, Professor James Stevenson Kenney, for his excellent guidance and all the suggestions that help me conduct the research, solve the problems, and improve my dissertation. I would also like to thank my committee members: Professor Kevin T. Kornegay, Professor Thomas G. Habetler, Professor Paul A. Kohl, and Dr. Chang-Ho Lee for their time in reviewing my dissertation and all the invaluable suggestions. I would also like to express my appreciation to the leaders in various projects I was involved during the past four years, Dr. Joy Laskar, Dr. Chang-Ho Lee, and Dr. Wangmyoong Woo. Their valuable comments on my work and relative knowledge about the project have been a tremendous help to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Filters Design Tutorial - 3
    Electronic filters design tutorial - 3 High pass, low pass and notch passive filters In the first and second part of this tutorial we visited the band pass filters, with lumped and distributed elements. In this third part we will discuss about low-pass, high-pass and notch filters. The approach will be without mathematics, the goal will be to introduce readers to a physical knowledge of filters. People interested in a mathematical analysis will find in the appendix some books on the topic. Fig.2 ∗ The constant K low-pass filter: it was invented in 1922 by George Campbell and the Running the simulation we can see the response meaning of constant K is the expression: of the filter in fig.3 2 ZL* ZC = K = R ZL and ZC are the impedances of inductors and capacitors in the filter, while R is the terminating impedance. A look at fig.1 will be clarifying. Fig.3 It is clear that the sharpness of the response increase as the order of the filter increase. The ripple near the edge of the cutoff moves from Fig 1 monotonic in 3 rd order to ringing of about 1.7 dB for the 9 th order. This due to the mismatch of the The two filter configurations, at T and π are various sections that are connected to a 50 Ω displayed, all the reactance are 50 Ω and the impedance at the edges of the filter and filter cells are all equal. In practice the two series connected to reactive impedances between cells.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Attenuators and Switches the State of the Switch Is Controlled by Some
    9/29/2006 Attenuators and Switches notes 1/1 6. Attenuators and Switches The state of the switch is controlled by some digital logic, and there is a different scattering matrix for each state. HO: Microwave Switches HO: The Microwave Switch Spec Sheet We can combine fixed attenuators with microwave switches to create very important and useful devices—the variable (digital) attenuator. HO: Attenuators HO: The Digital Attenuator Spec Sheet We typically make switches and voltage controlled attenuators with PIN diodes. If you are interested, you might check out the handout below (no, this handout below will not be on any exam!). HO: PIN Diodes Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 9/29/2006 Microwave Switches 1/4 Microwave Switches Consider an ideal microwave SPDT switch. 1 Z0 3 2 control Z0 The scattering matrix will have one of two forms: ⎡⎤001 ⎡⎤ 000 ==⎢⎥ ⎢⎥ SS13⎢⎥000 23 ⎢⎥ 001 ⎣⎦⎢⎥100 ⎣⎦⎢⎥ 010 where S13 describes the device when port 1 is connected to port 3: 1 Z0 3 2 control Z0 Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 9/29/2006 Microwave Switches 2/4 and where S23 describes the device when port 2 is connected to port 3: 1 Z0 3 2 Z control 0 These ideal switches are called matched, or absorptive switches, as ports 1 and 2 remain matched, even when not connected. This is in contrast to a reflective switch, where the disconnected port will be perfectly reflective, i.e., ⎡⎤001⎡e jφ 00⎤ ⎢ ⎥ ==⎢⎥jφ SS13⎢⎥00e 23 ⎢ 001⎥ ⎣⎦⎢⎥100⎣⎢ 010⎦⎥ where of course e jφ = 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ! ! ! 4.14 Impedance Transformation Equation
    IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMATION EQUATION 101 4.14 IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMATION EQUATION One of the most common tasks in microwave engineering is the determination of how a load impedance ZL is transformed to a new input impedance ZIN by a length of uniform transmission line of characteristic impedance Z0 and electri- cal length y (Fig. 4.14-1). To simplify this derivation, we assume that the line length is lossless. With the choice of x ¼ 0 at the load, the input to the line is at x ¼l, and the input impedance there is jbl Àjbl V ðx ¼lÞ e þ GLe Z Z x l Z 4:14-1 IN ¼ ð ¼Þ¼ ¼ 0 jbl Àjbl ð Þ I ðx ¼lÞ e À GLe jbl Now substitute GL ¼ðZL À Z0Þ=ðZL þ Z0Þ, bl ¼ y, the identities e ¼ cos bl þ j sin bl and eÀjbl ¼ cos bl À j sin bl into (4.14-1), and remove cancel- ing terms to get 2ZL cos y þ j2Z0 sin y ZIN ¼ Z0 2Z0 cos y þ j2ZL sin y ð4:14-2Þ ZL þ jZ0 tan y ZIN ¼ Z0 Z0 þ jZL tan y Similar reasoning can be used to evaluate the input impedance when the trans- mission line has finite losses. The result is ZL þ Z0 tanh gl ZIN ¼ Z0 ð4:14-3Þ Z0 þ ZL tanh gl This is one of the most important equations in microwave engineering and is called the impedance transformation equation. Remarkably, (4.14-2) and (4.14-3) have exactly the same format when derived in terms of admittance.
    [Show full text]