The Self-Resonance and Self-Capacitance of Solenoid Coils: Applicable Theory, Models and Calculation Methods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Self-Resonance and Self-Capacitance of Solenoid Coils: Applicable Theory, Models and Calculation Methods 1 The self-resonance and self-capacitance of solenoid coils: applicable theory, models and calculation methods. By David W Knight1 Version2 1.00, 4th May 2016. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1472.0887 Abstract The data on which Medhurst's semi-empirical self-capacitance formula is based are re-analysed in a way that takes the permittivity of the coil-former into account. The updated formula is compared with theories attributing self-capacitance to the capacitance between adjacent turns, and also with transmission-line theories. The inter-turn capacitance approach is found to have no predictive power. Transmission-line behaviour is corroborated by measurements using an induction loop and a receiving antenna, and by visualising the electric field using a gas discharge tube. In-circuit solenoid self-capacitance determinations show long-coil asymptotic behaviour corresponding to a wave propagating along the helical conductor with a phase-velocity governed by the local refractive index (i.e., v = c if the medium is air). This is consistent with measurements of transformer phase error vs. frequency, which indicate a constant time delay. These observations are at odds with the fact that a long solenoid in free space will exhibit helical propagation with a frequency-dependent phase velocity > c. The implication is that unmodified helical-waveguide theories are not appropriate for the prediction of self-capacitance, but they remain applicable in principle to open- circuit systems, such as Tesla coils, helical resonators and loaded vertical antennas, despite poor agreement with actual measurements. A semi-empirical method is given for predicting the first self- resonance frequencies of free coils by treating the coil as a helical transmission-line terminated by its own axial-field and fringe-field capacitances. Keywords: circuit modelling, solenoid coil, self-capacitance, self-resonance, helical waveguide, sheet helix, sheath helix. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Prof. Tuck Choy (M0TCC) for detailed reading and discussion of this work, and for providing reference materials and corrections. I would also like to thank Bob Weaver for discussions, corrections, inductance calculation programs, and reference materials; Alex Pettit (KK4VB) for the long coil measurements discussed in the text; Dr Duncan Cadd (G0UTY) for the donation of a large PTFE-cored test coil; and Dr Richard Craven for discussions and for introducing me to the literature on folded helical resonators. 1 Ottery St Mary, Devon, UK. website: http://g3ynh.info/ http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0499-3938 2 Please check the author's website for updates and supplementary material. http://g3ynh.info/zdocs/magnetics/appendix/self-res.html © D. W. Knight, 2009 - 2016. 2 Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................................1 1.0 The inductor modelling problem ................................................................................................3 1.1 Scattering experiment .................................................................................................................8 1.2 Conductor length vs. SRF .........................................................................................................12 1.3 Single-conductor transmission-line ..........................................................................................14 1.4 Normal-mode antennas and Tesla coils ....................................................................................18 1.5 Helical resonators .....................................................................................................................20 1.6 Helical waveguide models overview .........................................................................................21 1.7 Velocity-factor for a finite free helix ........................................................................................23 Simple fringe-field correction ....................................................................................................27 Decline of velocity factor with frequency .................................................................................29 1.8 Velocity factor for an infinite free helix ....................................................................................30 Kandoian & Sichak ....................................................................................................................34 2.0 Self-capacitance .......................................................................................................................39 2.1 Propagation of uncertainty from SRF to self-capacitance ........................................................39 2.2 Self-capacitance derived from the conductor-length ................................................................41 3. Medhurst's formula ...................................................................................................................43 Repeat of Medhurst's data analysis ...........................................................................................44 4. Coil-former dielectric ...............................................................................................................45 5. Empirically-corrected formula for self-capacitance .................................................................50 6. Inter-turn capacitance ...............................................................................................................53 7. Comparison of self-capacitance formulae ................................................................................55 8. Tubular coil formers .................................................................................................................60 9. Axial induced electric-field capacitance ..................................................................................62 Correction for internal dielectric ...............................................................................................65 10. Velocity limiting .......................................................................................................................70 11. Free coil SRF calculation ..........................................................................................................77 Helical-line surge resistance ......................................................................................................79 Uniform current surge resistance ...............................................................................................80 Nominal VF - short coil limiting case .......................................................................................81 Nominal VF - Iterative solution ................................................................................................83 Pitch-angle correction ................................................................................................................88 Long-coil correction ..................................................................................................................89 Coil former dielectric .................................................................................................................91 Model properties, limitations and overall calculation procedure ..............................................95 12. Pseudo self-capacitance ............................................................................................................98 13. Discussion and summary .........................................................................................................101 Glossary .........................................................................................................................................103 Revision history ..............................................................................................................................105 3 1.0 The inductor modelling problem Of the circuit theory elements: resistance, capacitance and inductance; the latter is the least amenable to realisation in practical devices. The reason is that the lumped-component theory depends on the assumption that every physical dimension is negligible in comparison to the operating wavelength. In a wound inductor, the difficulty lies with the length of the piece of wire inside it. Although that wire might be coiled-up in a small volume, its full length nevertheless dictates the inductor's high-frequency behaviour. When a solenoid coil is operated in the regime in which wire length is negligible in comparison to wavelength, its partial inductance3 can be calculated with good accuracy from magnetic considerations alone. A straightforward basis for so doing is the hypothetical current-sheet inductor that, with corrections for realistic wire, allows the inductance of coils of small pitch-angle to be determined from physical parameters to an accuracy of around one part-per-thousand4. Magnetic theory must, of course, be respected in the asymptotic behaviour of any hypothesis that purports to describe inductors at high frequencies, and this has been a weakness in some of the more influential studies. At audio and low-radio frequencies, the situation is complicated by the onset of the skin effect, and its companion, the proximity effect. The internal impedance of isolated wires is
Recommended publications
  • A Review of Electric Impedance Matching Techniques for Piezoelectric Sensors, Actuators and Transducers
    Review A Review of Electric Impedance Matching Techniques for Piezoelectric Sensors, Actuators and Transducers Vivek T. Rathod Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-517-249-5207 Received: 29 December 2018; Accepted: 29 January 2019; Published: 1 February 2019 Abstract: Any electric transmission lines involving the transfer of power or electric signal requires the matching of electric parameters with the driver, source, cable, or the receiver electronics. Proceeding with the design of electric impedance matching circuit for piezoelectric sensors, actuators, and transducers require careful consideration of the frequencies of operation, transmitter or receiver impedance, power supply or driver impedance and the impedance of the receiver electronics. This paper reviews the techniques available for matching the electric impedance of piezoelectric sensors, actuators, and transducers with their accessories like amplifiers, cables, power supply, receiver electronics and power storage. The techniques related to the design of power supply, preamplifier, cable, matching circuits for electric impedance matching with sensors, actuators, and transducers have been presented. The paper begins with the common tools, models, and material properties used for the design of electric impedance matching. Common analytical and numerical methods used to develop electric impedance matching networks have been reviewed. The role and importance of electrical impedance matching on the overall performance of the transducer system have been emphasized throughout. The paper reviews the common methods and new methods reported for electrical impedance matching for specific applications. The paper concludes with special applications and future perspectives considering the recent advancements in materials and electronics.
    [Show full text]
  • RF Coils, Helical Resonators and Voltage Magnification by Coherent Spatial Modes
    TELSIKS 2001, University of Nis, Yugoslavia (September 19-21, 2001) and MICROWAVE REVIEW 1 RF Coils, Helical Resonators and Voltage Magnification by Coherent Spatial Modes K.L. Corum* and J.F. Corum** “Is there, I ask, can there be, a more interesting study than that of alternating currents.” Nikola Tesla, (Life Fellow, and 1892 Vice President of the AIEE)1 Abstract – By modeling a wire-wound coil as an anisotropically II. CYLINDRICAL HELICES conducting cylindrical boundary, one may start from Maxwell’s equations and deduce the structure’s resonant behavior. Not A. Problem Formulation only can the propagation factor and characteristic impedance be determined for such a helically disposed surface waveguide, but also its resonances, “self-capacitance” (so-called), and its voltage A uniform helix is described by its radius (r = a), its pitch magnification by standing waves. Further, the Tesla coil passes (or turn-to-turn wire spacing "s"), and its pitch angle ψ, to a conventional lumped element inductor as the helix is which is the angle that the tangent to the helix makes with a electrically shortened. plane perpendicular to the axis of the structure (z). Geometrically, ψ = cot-1(2πa/s). The wave equation is not Keywords – coil, helix, surface wave, resonator, inductor, Tesla. separable in helical coordinates and there exists no rigorous 3 solution of Maxwell's equations for the solenoidal helix. I. INTRODUCTION However, at radio frequencies a wire-wound helix with many turns per free-space wavelength (e.g., a Tesla coil) One of the more significant challenges in electrical may be modeled as an idealized anisotropically conducting cylindrical surface that conducts only in the helical science is that of constricting a great deal of insulated conductor into a compact spatial volume and determining direction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of Electromagnetic Processes in the Experiments of Tesla
    The study of electromagnetic processes in the experiments of Tesla B. Sacco1, A.K. Tomilin 2, 1 RAI, Center for Research and Technological Innovation (Turin, Italy), [email protected] 2National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (Tomsk, Russian Federation), [email protected] The Tesla wireless transmission of energy original experiment, proposed again in a downsized scale by K. Meyl, has been replicated in order to test the hypothesis of the existence of electroscalar (longitudinal) waves. Additional experiments have been performed, in which we have investigated the features of the electromagnetic processes between the two spherical antennas. In particular, the origin of coils resonances has been measured and analyzed. Resonant frequencies calculated on the basis of the generalized electrodynamic theory, are in good agreement with the experimental values found. Keywords: Tesla transformer, K. Meyl experiments, electroscalar waves, generalized electrodynamics, coil resonant frequency. 1. Introduction In the early twentieth century, Tesla conducted experiments in which he demonstrated unusual properties of electromagnetic waves. Results of experiments have been published in the newspapers, and many devices were patented (e.g. [1]). However, such work has not received suitable theoretical explanation, and so far no practical application of the results have been developed. One hundred years later, Professor K. Meyl [2] aimed to reproduce the same experiments using a miniature, laboratory version of the Tesla setup, arguing that it can help to detect unusual phenomena that are explained by the presence of electroscalar (longitudinal) waves, namely: • the reaction on the transmitter of the presence of the receiver; • the transmission of scalar waves with a speed of 1,5 times the speed of light; • the inefficiency of a Faraday cage in shielding scalar waves, and • the possibility of wireless transmission of electrical energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    Nanotechnology Education - Engineering a better future NNCI.net Teacher’s Guide To See or Not to See? Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Surfaces Grade Level: Middle & high Summary: This activity can be school completed as a separate one or in conjunction with the lesson Subject area(s): Physical Superhydrophobicexpialidocious: science & Chemistry Learning about hydrophobic surfaces found at: Time required: (2) 50 https://www.nnci.net/node/5895. minutes classes The activity is a visual demonstration of the difference between hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. Using a polystyrene Learning objectives: surface (petri dish) and a modified Tesla coil, you can chemically Through observation and alter the non-masked surface to become hydrophilic. Students experimentation, students will learn that we can chemically change the surface of a will understand how the material on the nano level from a hydrophobic to hydrophilic surface of a material can surface. The activity helps students learn that how a material be chemically altered. behaves on the macroscale is affected by its structure on the nanoscale. The activity is adapted from Kim et. al’s 2012 article in the Journal of Chemical Education (see references). Background Information: Teacher Background: Commercial products have frequently taken their inspiration from nature. For example, Velcro® resulted from a Swiss engineer, George Mestral, walking in the woods and wondering why burdock seeds stuck to his dog and his coat. Other bio-inspired products include adhesives, waterproof materials, and solar cells among many others. Scientists often look at nature to get ideas and designs for products that can help us. We call this study of nature biomimetics (see Resource section for further information).
    [Show full text]
  • Elementary Filter Circuits
    Modular Electronics Learning (ModEL) project * SPICE ckt v1 1 0 dc 12 v2 2 1 dc 15 r1 2 3 4700 r2 3 0 7100 .dc v1 12 12 1 .print dc v(2,3) .print dc i(v2) .end V = I R Elementary Filter Circuits c 2018-2021 by Tony R. Kuphaldt – under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License Last update = 13 September 2021 This is a copyrighted work, but licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this license is found in the last Appendix of this document. Alternatively, you may visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons: 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. The terms and conditions of this license allow for free copying, distribution, and/or modification of all licensed works by the general public. ii Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Case Tutorial 5 2.1 Example: RC filter design ................................. 6 3 Tutorial 9 3.1 Signal separation ...................................... 9 3.2 Reactive filtering ...................................... 10 3.3 Bode plots .......................................... 14 3.4 LC resonant filters ..................................... 15 3.5 Roll-off ........................................... 17 3.6 Mechanical-electrical filters ................................ 18 3.7 Summary .......................................... 20 4 Historical References 25 4.1 Wave screens ........................................ 26 5 Derivations and Technical References 29 5.1 Decibels ........................................... 30 6 Programming References 41 6.1 Programming in C++ ................................... 42 6.2 Programming in Python .................................. 46 6.3 Modeling low-pass filters using C++ ........................... 51 7 Questions 63 7.1 Conceptual reasoning ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ec6503 - Transmission Lines and Waveguides Transmission Lines and Waveguides Unit I - Transmission Line Theory 1
    EC6503 - TRANSMISSION LINES AND WAVEGUIDES TRANSMISSION LINES AND WAVEGUIDES UNIT I - TRANSMISSION LINE THEORY 1. Define – Characteristic Impedance [M/J–2006, N/D–2006] Characteristic impedance is defined as the impedance of a transmission line measured at the sending end. It is given by 푍 푍0 = √ ⁄푌 where Z = R + jωL is the series impedance Y = G + jωC is the shunt admittance 2. State the line parameters of a transmission line. The line parameters of a transmission line are resistance, inductance, capacitance and conductance. Resistance (R) is defined as the loop resistance per unit length of the transmission line. Its unit is ohms/km. Inductance (L) is defined as the loop inductance per unit length of the transmission line. Its unit is Henries/km. Capacitance (C) is defined as the shunt capacitance per unit length between the two transmission lines. Its unit is Farad/km. Conductance (G) is defined as the shunt conductance per unit length between the two transmission lines. Its unit is mhos/km. 3. What are the secondary constants of a line? The secondary constants of a line are 푍 i. Characteristic impedance, 푍0 = √ ⁄푌 ii. Propagation constant, γ = α + jβ 4. Why the line parameters are called distributed elements? The line parameters R, L, C and G are distributed over the entire length of the transmission line. Hence they are called distributed parameters. They are also called primary constants. The infinite line, wavelength, velocity, propagation & Distortion line, the telephone cable 5. What is an infinite line? [M/J–2012, A/M–2004] An infinite line is a line where length is infinite.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla's Coil. a Toy Or Useful Thing in the Life of Radio Engineering?
    УДК 537 Ільчук Д.Р. Tesla's coil. A toy or useful thing in the life of radio engineering? Вінницький національний технічний університет Аннотація. У цій статті, подан опис такого приладу як Котушка Тесли. Наведені її характеристики, принцип роботи, історія створення та значення в сучасному житті. Також описані процеси створення власноруч та розсуди про практичність даного виробу у реальному житті. Ключові слова: Котушка індуктивності, висока напруга, Нікола Тесла, радіотехніка, електрична дуга. Abstract. This article contains a description of the device as a Tesla coil. These characteristics of the principle of history and value creation in modern life. Also describes the process of creating his own judge and practicality of this product in real life. Keywords: Inductor, high voltage, Nikola Tesla, radio, electric arc. I.Introduction Perhaps in the life of every student comes a time when it begins to be interested in their field. In some it comes in the first year, someone on last. At the beginning of the 3rd year I finally decided to solder something with their hands. The choice immediately fell on Tesla coil. But is this thing so important, whether it is only a toy, which is impossible to do anything useful? Let us know about it. II. Summary The Tesla coil is an electrical resonant transformer circuit designed by inventor Nikola Tesla around 1891 as a power supply for his "System of Electric Lighting".It is used to produce high-voltage, low-current, high frequency alternating-current electricity. Tesla experimented with a number of different configurations consisting of two, or sometimes three, coupled resonant electric circuits.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ULTIMATE Tesla Coil Design and CONSTRUCTION GUIDE the ULTIMATE Tesla Coil Design and CONSTRUCTION GUIDE
    THE ULTIMATE Tesla Coil Design AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDE THE ULTIMATE Tesla Coil Design AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDE Mitch Tilbury New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. 0-07-159589-9 The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: 0-07-149737-4. All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trademarked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringement of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps. McGraw-Hill eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs. For more information, please contact George Hoare, Special Sales, at [email protected] or (212) 904-4069. TERMS OF USE This is a copyrighted work and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw-Hill”) and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use of this work is subject to these terms. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the right to store and retrieve one copy of the work, you may not decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce, modify, create derivative works based upon, transmit, distribute, disseminate, sell, publish or sublicense the work or any part of it without McGraw-Hill’s prior consent.
    [Show full text]
  • Modal Propagation and Excitation on a Wire-Medium Slab
    1112 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 56, NO. 5, MAY 2008 Modal Propagation and Excitation on a Wire-Medium Slab Paolo Burghignoli, Senior Member, IEEE, Giampiero Lovat, Member, IEEE, Filippo Capolino, Senior Member, IEEE, David R. Jackson, Fellow, IEEE, and Donald R. Wilton, Life Fellow, IEEE Abstract—A grounded wire-medium slab has recently been shown to support leaky modes with azimuthally independent propagation wavenumbers capable of radiating directive omni- directional beams. In this paper, the analysis is generalized to wire-medium slabs in air, extending the omnidirectionality prop- erties to even modes, performing a parametric analysis of leaky modes by varying the geometrical parameters of the wire-medium lattice, and showing that, in the long-wavelength regime, surface modes cannot be excited at the interface between the air and wire medium. The electric field excited at the air/wire-medium interface by a horizontal electric dipole parallel to the wires is also studied by deriving the relevant Green’s function for the homogenized slab model. When the near field is dominated by a leaky mode, it is found to be azimuthally independent and almost perfectly linearly polarized. This result, which has not been previ- ously observed in any other leaky-wave structure for a single leaky mode, is validated through full-wave moment-method simulations of an actual wire-medium slab with a finite size. Index Terms—Leaky modes, metamaterials, near field, planar Fig. 1. (a) Wire-medium slab in air with the relevant coordinate axes. (b) Transverse view of the wire-medium slab with the relevant geometrical slab, wire medium.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS July 18, 1989 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS COMMEMORATING NIKOLA Has Been Called the Forgotten Genius
    15076 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS July 18, 1989 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS COMMEMORATING NIKOLA has been called the Forgotten Genius. Universities of Paris and Graz and the Poly­ TESLA There is not only the known and the un­ technical School in Bucharest in 1937, the known Tesla, but the unknowable-called by University of Grenoble in 1938, and the Uni­ some an eccentric, by others a mystic, a vi­ versity of Sofia in 1939. HON. GEORGE W. GEKAS sionary, and a person of extraordinary Tesla was made a member or honorary OF PENNSYLVANIA powers of perception . And so Nikola fellow of various academic and professional Tesla's memory is virtually venerated by societies: the American Association for the IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES some and utterly neglected by many more. Advancement of Science in 1895, the Ameri­ Tuesday, July 18, 1989 Tesla deserves to be known better. can Electro-Therapeutic Association in 1903, It is not my purpose today to describe the New York Academy of Sciences in 1907, Mr. GEKAS. Mr. Speaker, I would like to Tesla's life and works. This has already the American Institute of Electrical Engi­ take this opportunity to honor the 133d anni­ been done by dozens of biographers and his­ neers in 1917, the Serbian Academy of Sci­ versary of the birth of a scientist whose inven­ torians of science. Perhaps it is enough ences in Belgrade in 1937, and many others. tions sit in the ranks with those of Edison, merely to cite a readily available source The medals and other honors which he re­ Watts, and Marconi.
    [Show full text]
  • Waveguide Propagation
    NTNU Institutt for elektronikk og telekommunikasjon Januar 2006 Waveguide propagation Helge Engan Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2 2 Propagation in waveguides, general relations .................................................................... 2 2.1 TEM waves ................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 TE waves .................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 TM waves ................................................................................................................. 14 3 TE modes in metallic waveguides ................................................................................... 14 3.1 TE modes in a parallel-plate waveguide .................................................................. 14 3.1.1 Mathematical analysis ...................................................................................... 15 3.1.2 Physical interpretation ..................................................................................... 17 3.1.3 Velocities ......................................................................................................... 19 3.1.4 Fields ................................................................................................................ 21 3.2 TE modes in rectangular waveguides .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Superconducting Nano-Mechanical Diamond Resonators
    Superconducting nano-mechanical diamond resonators Tobias Bautze,1,2, ∗ Soumen Mandal,1,2, † Oliver A. Williams,3, 4 Pierre Rodi`ere,1, 2 Tristan Meunier,1, 2 and Christopher B¨auerle1,2, ‡ 1Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inst. NEEL, F-38042 Grenoble, France 2CNRS, Inst. NEEL, F-38042 Grenoble, France 3Fraunhofer-Institut f¨ur Angewandte Festk¨orperphysik, Tullastraße 72, 79108 Freiburg, Germany 4University of Cardiff, School of Physics and Astronomy, Queens Buildings, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, United Kingdom (Dated: October 9, 2018) In this work we present the fabrication and characterization of superconducting nano-mechanical resonators made from nanocrystalline boron doped diamond (BDD). The oscillators can be driven and read out in their superconducting state and show quality factors as high as 40,000 at a resonance frequency of around 10 MHz. Mechanical damping is studied for magnetic fields up to 3 T where the resonators still show superconducting properties. Due to their simple fabrication procedure, the devices can easily be coupled to other superconducting circuits and their performance is comparable with state-of-the-art technology. I. INTRODUCTION II. FABRICATION The nano-mechanical resonators have been fabricated Nano-mechanical resonators allow to explore a vari- from a superconducting nanocrystaline diamond film, ety of physical phenomena. From a technological point grown on a silicon wafer with a 500 nm thick SiO2 layer. 1–3 of view, they can be used for ultra-sensitive mass , To be able to grow diamond on the Si/SiO2 surface, small force4–6, charge7,8 and displacement detection. On the diamond particles of a diameter smaller than 6 nm are more fundamental side, they offer fascinating perspec- seeded onto the silica substrate with the highest possi- tives for studying macroscopic quantum systems.
    [Show full text]