DOCSLIB.ORG

The Political Elites' Discourse of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Denmark and Sweden

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Political Elites' Discourse of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Denmark and Sweden The Political Elites’ Discourse of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Denmark and Sweden Written by Mia Lund Bekke Denise Helt Persson Development & International Relations Dissertation Supervisor: Wolfgang Zank Aalborg University, 2015 Page 1 of 99 Preface The dissertation finishes our master degree in Development and International Relations with the headline “The Political Elites’ Discourse of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Denmark and Sweden”. The dissertation has been carried out as a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden, focusing on the mainstream parties' acceptance of right-wing populist parties in each country. It is examined by a discourse analysis based on Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory supplemented by Fairclough's concept ‘order of discourse’. We would like to take this opportunity to thank our supervisor Wolfgang Zank for his educational inputs and dedication. Page 2 of 99 Table of Content Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Problem Area ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Problem statement and modification .......................................................................................................... 7 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Project specifications .................................................................................................................................... 9 Case study: Comparative ........................................................................................................................... 10 Choice of discourse analysis as theoretical approach ............................................................................. 11 Choice of empirical material ..................................................................................................................... 12 Choice of Analysis Strategy ....................................................................................................................... 13 Scientific stance ................................................................................................................................ 14 Discourse in a theoretical scientific perspective ...................................................................................... 14 Structuralism and post-structuralism ....................................................................................................... 15 Initial on Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory ..................................................................................... 16 Epistemological implications ................................................................................................................... 17 The field of discourse ....................................................................................................................... 19 Unfolding the concept of discourse ........................................................................................................... 19 Two approaches to discourse analysis ..................................................................................................... 19 The individual discourse and its notions .................................................................................................. 20 Political precedence and the weighted importance of actors ................................................................. 23 Hegemony and political sedimentation .................................................................................................... 24 Antagonism and agonism ........................................................................................................................... 25 Discourse and order of discourse .............................................................................................................. 27 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 Our conceptualisation of the field of discourse ....................................................................................... 29 Empirical Overview ......................................................................................................................... 32 Denmark ...................................................................................................................................................... 32 The Right-Wing Populist Danish People’s Party .................................................................................... 32 Discursive development in mainstream parties ....................................................................................... 35 The Context .............................................................................................................................................. 45 Sweden ......................................................................................................................................................... 45 The Sweden Democrats ........................................................................................................................... 45 Page 3 of 99 Populism - hard to break through ............................................................................................................. 47 Political reactions - The mainstream political discourse ......................................................................... 50 Analysis Strategy .............................................................................................................................. 54 Hypotheses .................................................................................................................................................. 54 Using the discourse theory ......................................................................................................................... 55 Physical Objects and Institutions .............................................................................................................. 56 Discursive field and order of discourse .................................................................................................... 56 Conceptualisations ..................................................................................................................................... 57 Right-wing populist parties ...................................................................................................................... 57 Multiculturalism ....................................................................................................................................... 58 Nationalism .............................................................................................................................................. 59 Open debate ............................................................................................................................................. 60 Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 61 Multiculturalism vs. Nationalism .............................................................................................................. 61 Sweden ..................................................................................................................................................... 61 Denmark ................................................................................................................................................... 64 Comparing Denmark and Sweden ........................................................................................................... 66 Political correctness vs. Open debate ....................................................................................................... 67 Denmark ................................................................................................................................................... 67 Sweden ..................................................................................................................................................... 71 Comparing Denmark and Sweden ........................................................................................................... 73 Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 74 Societal and historical context ................................................................................................................... 77 Emergence of new discourses .................................................................................................................. 77 The issue of immigration ......................................................................................................................... 79 Democratic consequences ........................................................................................................................ 80 Critical reflections on theory appliance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Denmark and Finland: (Not Always) a Success for the Far-Right Nina Liljeqvist and Kristian Voss 30 May 2014
    Denmark and Finland: (not always) a success for the far-right Nina Liljeqvist and Kristian Voss 30 May 2014 Finland Populist and European Union (EU)–critical Finns Party (PS) was expected to pose a serious challenge to the established parties in the Finnish election to the European Parliament last Sunday. Having achieved tremendous success in the national elections in 2011 and continuing to ride high on the Euro- sceptic sentiments this spring, the PS aimed to increase their number of seats in the European Parliament from one to three, with polls having predicted that the party would receive as much as 21% of the votes. However, the Euro- sceptic sensation never happened in Finland. This may be partly explained by the fact that the party did not have a prominent top candidate, or rather, by the fact that this top candidate was not charismatic party leader Timo Soini, who has decided to focus on domestic politics instead. PS did increase their support compared with the 2009 election, scoring 12.9% and consequently gaining one seat, but this result is obviously far from what they were hoping for. Instead, the Finnish electorate favoured established parties in this year’s European election. The liberal conservative National Coalition Party (KOK), which is the party of current prime minister Jyrki Katainen, kept its grip on the electorate with 22.6% of the votes, thereby securing the three seats it cur- rently has in the parliament. One explanation for this success is the vote mag- net Alexander Stubb, current minister for European affairs and foreign trade, who single-handedly got the party 8.6% of the vote share.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy
    bailes_hb.qxd 21/3/06 2:14 pm Page 1 Alyson J. K. Bailes (United Kingdom) is A special feature of Europe’s Nordic region the Director of SIPRI. She has served in the is that only one of its states has joined both British Diplomatic Service, most recently as the European Union and NATO. Nordic British Ambassador to Finland. She spent countries also share a certain distrust of several periods on detachment outside the B Recent and forthcoming SIPRI books from Oxford University Press A approaches to security that rely too much service, including two academic sabbaticals, A N on force or that may disrupt the logic and I a two-year period with the British Ministry of D SIPRI Yearbook 2005: L liberties of civil society. Impacting on this Defence, and assignments to the European E Armaments, Disarmament and International Security S environment, the EU’s decision in 1999 to S Union and the Western European Union. U THE NORDIC develop its own military capacities for crisis , She has published extensively in international N Budgeting for the Military Sector in Africa: H management—taken together with other journals on politico-military affairs, European D The Processes and Mechanisms of Control E integration and Central European affairs as E ongoing shifts in Western security agendas Edited by Wuyi Omitoogun and Eboe Hutchful R L and in USA–Europe relations—has created well as on Chinese foreign policy. Her most O I COUNTRIES AND U complex challenges for Nordic policy recent SIPRI publication is The European Europe and Iran: Perspectives on Non-proliferation L S Security Strategy: An Evolutionary History, Edited by Shannon N.
    [Show full text]
  • Fredrik Reinfeldt and Vibeke Krag New Board Members of Heimstaden
    Press Release 8 March 2021 Fredrik Reinfeldt and Vibeke Krag New Board Members of Heimstaden Heimstaden AB is the majority owner and manager of Heimstaden Bostad AB, one of Europe’s leading residential real estate companies with more than 110,000 homes valued at approximately SEK 170 billion. With their substantial experience, the new board members will contribute to developing the com- pany. Chairman Ivar Tollefsen is looking forward to working with the new members: “Fredrik Reinfeldt has an impressive political career and has, after leaving office as Prime Minister of Sweden, continued to have a strong voice in societal and environ- mental topics. He is a perfect match for Heimstaden’s vision of Friendly Homes and our high ambitions of contributing to society. Vibeke Krag brings extensive financial and leadership experience from strong industrial companies. Being Danish, she has valuable knowledge about Denmark, Heimstaden’s largest market. I look forward to working with them both at Heimstaden.” New Board Members Fredrik Reinfeldt is an experienced politician who led the Swedish Moderate Party for 12 years and served eight years as Prime Minister of Sweden. Since retiring from politics in 2015, he has held positions as Chairman of Centrum for AMP and Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and as an advisor to Nordic Capital and Bank of America Merrill Lynch. “Heimstaden’s impressive growth, combined with its strong values of Care, Dare and Share, evergreen perspective and dedication to societal contribution, makes this a unique opportunity to positively impact lives in Sweden and across Europe. It is with great expectations and dedication that I will engage in developing the com- pany further,” said Fredrik Reinfeldt.
    [Show full text]
  • Denmark Has a New Government Nordea Research, 30 June 2015
    Helge J. Pedersen Denmark has a new government Nordea Research, 30 June 2015 Denmark has a new government with Lars Løkke Rasmussen of the Liberal Party as prime minister. After more than a week of negotiations between the Liberal Party and the other parties of the centre-right bloc, the Danish People’s Party, Liberal Alliance and the Conservative Party, it was clear that the parties were too far apart to form a broad coalition. Denmark is now led by a pure Liberal Party minority government comprising 17 ministries. Minority governments are by no means unusual. In fact most governments in Denmark have been minority governments. A one-party government is not uncommon either. But what is unusual is the fact that this is a pure Liberal Party government. The last time this happened was under the premiership of Poul Hartling (1973-75). It is also unusual that the prime minister is from the country’s third-largest party. The last time this happened was with the coalition comprising the Liberal Party, the Conservative Party and the Social Liberal Party (1968-71), when Hilmar Baunsgaard of the Social Liberals held the post as prime minister. Obviously, given the political realities, the new government must work with different partners among the parties in the new parliament to implement its policies. In this light it is no surprise that the new government has presented a broad platform (“Together for the future”). According to this, the new government’s key priorities can be summarised as follows: • More private sector jobs through a sound and responsible economic policy supporting growth and prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPOSED Living with Scandal, Rumour, and Gossip
    EXPOSED Living with scandal, rumour, and gossip L /� MIA-MARIE HAMMARLIN EXPOSED Living with scandal, rumour, and gossip Exposed Living with scandal, rumour, and gossip MIA-MARIE HAMMARLIN Lund University Press Copyright © Mia-Marie Hammarlin 2019 The right of Mia-Marie Hammarlin to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Lund University Press The Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology P.O. Box 117 SE-221 00 LUND Sweden http://lunduniversitypress.lu.se Lund University Press books are published in collaboration with Manchester University Press. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library An earlier version of this book appeared in Swedish, published by Hammarlin Bokförlag in 2015 as I stormens öga ISBN 978-91-9793-812-9 ISBN 978-91-983768-3-8 hardback ISBN 978-91-983768-4-5 open access First published 2019 An electronic version of this book is also available under a Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, thanks to the support of Lund University, which permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction provided the author(s) and Manchester University Press are fully cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. Details of the licence can be viewed at https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The publisher has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for any external or third-party internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Forenet I Mangfoldighed
    FORENET I MANGFOLDIGHED EUROPA 28 AF YLVA NILSSON EUROPA-PARLAMENTET Luxembourg: Kontoret for De Europæiske Fællesskabers Officielle Publikationer, 2010 ISBN 978-92-823-3212-2 © De Europæiske Fællesskaber, 2010 Eftertryk tilladt med kildeangivelse Printed in Denmark Forord ar Den europæiske Union med Lissabon-traktaten fået et solidt og lang- tidsholdbart fundament for sin videre udvikling i de europæiske folks tje- Hneste? Udfordringer skorter det ikke på. Vi nævner i flæng den finansielle og økonomiske krise, euroens stabilitet, klimaændringer, energiforsyning og -sikkerhed, en fælles udenrigstjeneste til varetagelse bl.a. af fredsbevarende operationer og udviklings- bistand, udvidelser, reform af Den fælles Landbrugspolitik og diskussion om de langsigtede budgetprioriteter, Lissabon-traktaten, som trådte i kraft 1. december 2009, giver rammerne og værk- tøjerne. Det er op til institutionerne og det politiske lederskab at levere varen. Og EU skal definere og finde sin rolle på den globale scene. Der er jo rent faktisk opnået en hel del, siden det egentlige samarbejde startede i slutningen af 1950'erne. Den institutionelle balance ser ud til at fungere - det er i hvert fald svært at forestille sig et alternativ, som kan skabe bedre resultater. Ideen om en uafhængig Kommission, et demokratisk valgt Parlament og et Ministerråd med ansvar over for de nationale parlamenter har vist sig at være langtidsholdbar. Når man kigger på udviklingen i samarbejdet siden Rom-traktatens ikrafttræden i 1958 kan man godt blive lidt overvældet og imponeret af resultaterne. De oprinde- lige seks medlemslande er blevet til 27 og bliver formentlig snart endnu flere. Det splittede, sønderbombede og forarmede Europa efter 2. verdenskrig og den kolde krig er blevet et demokratisk, fredeligt og socialt Europa med næsten en halv mil- liard indbyggere.
    [Show full text]
  • Fredrik Reinfeldt
    2014 Press release 03 June 2014 Prime Minister's Office REMINDER: German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister David Cameron and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte to Harpsund On Monday and Tuesday 9-10 June, Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt will host a high-level meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister David Cameron and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte at Harpsund. The European Union needs to improve job creation and growth now that the EU is gradually recovering from the economic crisis. At the same time, the EU is facing institutional changes with a new European Parliament and a new European Commission taking office in the autumn. Sweden, Germany, the UK and the Netherlands are all reform and growth-oriented countries. As far as Sweden is concerned, it will be important to emphasise structural reforms to boost EU competitiveness, strengthen the Single Market, increase trade relations and promote free movement. These issues will be at the centre of the discussions at Harpsund. Germany, the UK and the Netherlands, like Sweden, are on the World Economic Forum's list of the world's ten most competitive countries. It is natural, therefore, for these countries to come together to compare experiences and discuss EU reform. Programme points: Monday 9 June 18.30 Chancellor Merkel, PM Cameron and PM Rutte arrive at Harpsund; outdoor photo opportunity/door step. Tuesday 10 June 10.30 Joint concluding press conference. Possible further photo opportunities will be announced later. Accreditation is required through the MFA International Press Centre. Applications close on 4 June at 18.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Danish Cold War Historiography
    SURVEY ARTICLE Danish Cold War Historiography ✣ Rasmus Mariager This article reviews the scholarly debate that has developed since the 1970s on Denmark and the Cold War. Over the past three decades, Danish Cold War historiography has reached a volume and standard that merits international attention. Until the 1970s, almost no archive-based research had been con- ducted on Denmark and the Cold War. Beginning in the late 1970s, however, historians and political scientists began to assess Danish Cold War history. By the time an encyclopedia on Denmark and the Cold War was published in 2011, it included some 400 entries written by 70 researchers, the majority of them established scholars.1 The expanding body of literature has shown that Danish Cold War pol- icy possessed characteristics that were generally applicable, particularly with regard to alliance policy. As a small frontline state that shared naval borders with East Germany and Poland, Denmark found itself in a difficult situation in relation to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as well as the Soviet Union. With regard to NATO, Danish policymakers balanced policies of integration and screening. The Danish government had to assure the Soviet Union of Denmark’s and NATO’s peaceful intentions even as Denmark and NATO concurrently rearmed. The balancing act was not easily managed. A review of Danish Cold War historiography also has relevance for con- temporary developments within Danish politics and research. Over the past quarter century, Danish Cold War history has been remarkably politicized.2 The end of the Cold War has seen the successive publication of reports and white books on Danish Cold War history commissioned by the Dan- ish government.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Copenhagen
    En historisk analyse af partilederskift i Danmark efter 1953 Hansen, Kasper Møller; Ringsmose, Jens Publication date: 2006 Document version Også kaldet Forlagets PDF Citation for published version (APA): Hansen, K. M., & Ringsmose, J. (2006). En historisk analyse af partilederskift i Danmark efter 1953. Institut for Statskundskab. Download date: 29. sep.. 2021 En historisk analyse af partilederskift i Danmark efter 1953 Kasper Møller Hansen og Jens Ringsmose Institut for Statskundskab Arbejdspapir 2006/10 0 Institut for Statskundskab Københavns Universitet Øster Farimagsgade 5 Postboks 2099 1014 København K ISSN 0906-1444 ISBN 87-7393-556-5 1 En historisk analyse af partilederskift i Danmark efter 19531 ”Opsigelsen bunder primært i den manglende sandsynlighed for opfyldelse af sæsonens målsætning” (23-12-2004 - Pressemeddelelse fra FC Nordsjælland A/S). ”Det er mig, der har haft lederskabet. Jeg har gjort det så godt jeg kunne, men resultatet er langt fra godt nok, og det påtager jeg mig ansvaret for” (Mogens Lykketoft, 8-2-2005) Kasper M. Hansen og Jens Ringsmose Institut for Statskundskab hhv. Københavns Universitet & Syddansk Universitet E-mail: [email protected] & [email protected] Resumé I de seneste 50 år har de fire gamle partier i dansk politik skiftet leder 26 gange. 16 af disse lederskift har været motiveret af manglende målopfyldelse i forhold til fire strategiske partimål – stemmemaksimering, regeringsdeltagelse, intern sammenhold og policy- indflydelse. Nederlag i relation til elektorale arena er den dominerende årsag til partilederskift. Det er imidlertid undtagelsen frem for reglen at et lederskifte resulterer i forbedret målopfyldelse inden for det første år efter skiftet. De resterende 10 lederskift har været foranlediget af dårligt helbred, dødsfald eller frivillig afgang og fandt – i helt overvejende omfang – sted i årene 1953-1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Foghs Enegang Bringer Dansk EU-Enhed I Fare
    Nr.4_side_35-39.qxd 24-01-03 18:09 Side 35 Mandagmorgen EU Foghs enegang bringer dansk EU-enhed i fare Sololøb. Fogh orienterede medierne om sine EU-visioner før ja-partierne - Det bryder med mange års koor- dinering af EU-politikken og kan svække dansk indflydelse i EU - Flere udmeldinger er vidtgående og har ikke garanti for flertal i Folketinget - Debatten om en EU-præsident har overskygget de øvrige udspil BRUXELLES - Da statsministeren onsdag i forrige uge re- og socialminister mener ikke, at Socialdemokratiet skulle præsentere sine EU-visioner ved en tale i Dansk og de Radikale skal aftale alting i detaljer med regerin- Institut for Internationale Studier (DIIS), var medierne gen, men peger på, at en tæt kontakt er naturlig, og at bedre orienteret om talens indhold end både de leden- det også hidtil har været sådan. de ja-partier og Udenrigsministeriet. Statsministerens Hverken Niels Helveg Petersen eller Henrik Dam tale var dagen forinden blevet lækket til danske og Kristensen, der er de to ja-partiers repræsentanter i udenlandske medier - bl.a. Politiken og Financial Konventet om Europas fremtid, var orienteret om Times. På samme tidspunkt blev Udenrigsministeriet statsministerens stribe af ganske detaljerede forslag bekendt med talens indhold, mens de ledende politi- eller begrundelsen for dem. De to, der i høj grad er kere fra Socialdemokratiet og de Radikale, der skal med til at tegne oppositionens EU-holdninger, hørte bære fremtidens danske europapolitik igennem sam- først om Foghs EU-forslag, da pressen udbad sig men med V og K, ikke var orienterede om tankerne i kommentarer. De kendte f.eks.
    [Show full text]
  • Det Offentlige Danmark 2018 © Digitaliseringsstyrelsen, 2018
    Det offentlige Danmark 2018 © Digitaliseringsstyrelsen, 2018 Udgiver: Finansministeriet Redaktion: Digitaliseringsstyrelsen Opsætning og layout: Rosendahls a/s ISBN 978-87-93073-23-4 ISSN 2446-4589 Det offentlige Danmark 2018 Oversigt over indretningen af den offentlige sektor Om publikationen Den første statshåndbog i Danmark udkom på tysk i Oversigt over de enkelte regeringer siden 1848 1734. Fra 1801 udkom en dansk udgave med vekslende Frem til seneste grundlovsændring i 1953 er udelukkende udgivere. Fra 1918 til 1926 blev den udgivet af Kabinets- regeringscheferne nævnt. Fra 1953 er alle ministre nævnt sekretariatet og Indenrigsministeriet og derefter af Kabi- med partibetegnelser. netssekretariatet og Statsministeriet. Udgivelsen Hof & Stat udkom sidste gang i 2013 i fuld version. Det er siden besluttet, at der etableres en oversigt over indretningen Person- og realregister af den offentlige sektor ved nærværende publikation, Der er ikke udarbejdet et person- og realregister til som udkom første gang i 2017. Det offentlige Danmark denne publikation. Ønsker man at fremfnde en bestem indeholder således en opgørelse over centrale instituti- person eller institution, henvises der til søgefunktionen oner i den offentlige sektor i Danmark, samt hvem der (Ctrl + f). leder disse. Hofdelen af den tidligere Hof- og Statskalen- der varetages af Kabinetssekretariatet, som stiller infor- mationer om Kongehuset til rådighed på Kongehusets Redaktionen hjemmeside. Indholdet til publikationen er indsamlet i første halvår 2018. Myndighederne er blevet
    [Show full text]
  • Day by Day Summary of the Election Campaign
    Day by Day Summary of the Election Campaign Friday, 26 August It was Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen’s plan to introduce a bonus to people purchasing a house. This bonus has been criticized for artificially inflating house prices and therefore for being a bad way to instigate growth. On Saturday 20 August the Social Democrats (S) somehow learned about the plan and decided to launch it themselves, despite Helle Thorning-Schmidt having said on Friday that she did not want to introduce measures to stimulate the housing market. This led to a chaotic Saturday where Løkke Rasmussen and the Liberal Party (V) tried to do damage control. Quickly the Danish People’s Party (DF) declared their opposition to the plan due to a lot of their voters not being house owners. Liberal Alliance (LA) is as a general rule opposed to state subsidies so they were opposed as well leaving V and the Conservative Party (K) alone with the plan on the blue wing. On the red wing the situation was similar. S and the Socialist People’s Party (SF) agreed on the idea while the Unity List (EL) represents the left wing and therefore does not believe in the state funding those with the means to buy a house – plus a lot of their voters rent their homes. The Social Liberal Party (R) is opposed with the argument that the plan is a shortsighted one which will probably not do much for the economy anyway. Thus S-SF and VK were alone and they did not want to cooperate to get a majority for the plan.
    [Show full text]