DOCSLIB.ORG

Link to Pdf Funding Ranking 2003. Institutions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Link to Pdf Funding Ranking 2003. Institutions Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft German Research Foundation Funding Ranking 2003 Institutions – Regions – Networks DFG Approvals and Other Basic Data on Publicly Funded Research With the support of Contacts: Dr. Jürgen Güdler (Conceptual design and project management) Dr. Jürgen Breitkopf (Project and data management) DFG project team, Information Management Section: Holger Hahnen Markus Jagsch Josef Kleinhans Michael Koch Thomas Lieser Izabela Paluch Dominik Sack Lisa Hoppe (Translation coordination) In cooperation with: Martin Beck, German Federal Statistical Office Dr. Helmut Buchholt, German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) Dr.-Ing. Martin Grabert, European Liaison Office of the German Research Organisations (KOWI) Heinz-Werner Hetmeier, German Federal Statistical Office Dr. Wolfgang Holl, Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (AvH) Dr. Lothar Krempel, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Germany Frank Sack, German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) Advisory board: Dr. Ulrike Albrecht, Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (AvH) Dr. Enno Aufderheide, Helmholtz Association (HGF) Dr. Stefan Echinger, Max Planck Society (MPG) Christoph Fischer, Fraunhofer Gesellschaft (FhG) Dr. Rolf Hoffmann, German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) Dr. Wolfgang Holl, Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (AvH) Dr. Michael Klein, Leibniz Association (WGL) Bernhard Lippert, Association of Universities and Higher Education Institutions in Germany (HRK) Prof. Anthony van Raan, Leiden University, Netherlands Dr. Heide Radlanski, Donors’ Association for the Promotion of Sciences and Humanities (SV) Marion Scheuer-Leeser, Helmholtz Association (HGF) Dr. Friedrich Tegelbekkers, German Science Council (WR) Dr. Ekkehard Winter, Donors’ Association for the Promotion of Sciences and Humanities (SV) Dr. Bruno Zimmermann, German Research Foundation (DFG) This report may be ordered from the DFG’s Press and Public Relations Office, Heike Klebe (+49 (0) 228 885-2109 or e-mail [email protected]). The online version, which includes more detailed analyses, can be found at http://www.dfg.de/en/ranking/index.html. Despite great care being taken in the compilation of this report and the data on which it is based, it cannot be ruled out that isolated errors may not be noticed until after going to print. Information on any such errors may be found on the DFG website at http://www.dfg.de/en/ranking/service/errata.html. The production of this report was carried out with the kind support of the Donors’ Association for the Promotion of Sciences and Humanities (SV). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Kennedyallee 40 · D-53175 Bonn · GERMANY Postal address: D-53170 Bonn · GERMANY Tel.: +49 (0) 228 / 885-1 · Fax.: +49 (0) 228 / 885-2777 E-mail: [email protected] · Internet: http://www.dfg.de Editing and design: Lemmens Verlags- & Mediengesellschaft mbH 2 Graphics: neo design (content), brighten the corners (cover) Production: Courir-Druck GmbH Translation: SciTech Communications GmbH Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft German Research Foundation Funding Ranking 2003 Institutions – Regions – Networks DFG Approvals and Other Basic Data on Publicly Funded Research 3 4 Foreword Competition has been a characteristic element search Foundation) and the Association of in science and the humanities for centuries, Universities and Other Higher Education both for those directly involved in research Institutions in Germany (Hochschulrektoren- and for their institutions. It has taken on new konferenz, HRK) have made this concern their forms in the last few decades, and in doing so own. Based on the statistics which the DFG has also gained a new quality, certainly in uses for its own reports and for internal analy- Europe and especially in Germany. In connec- sis, they have published two reports present- tion with the establishment of the “European ing the distribution of the financial resources Research Area”, the concept of benchmarking of the DFG to the institutions in which has gained in prominence; this refers to meth- research is conducted, differentiated by ods and techniques which are intended to research area, as an indicator of academic identify, using a clear and transparent method, activity and its quality. This was and is justi- the best research institutions in their respec- fied because the financial resources of the tive fields and to help determine best prac- DFG are awarded only to those scientists and tices. Ranking lists have for some time been in academics who, with their projects, join in the great demand in Germany: New efforts to ever-intensifying competition between the rank excellence are continually coming to the best ideas and in some programmes also market. Even in the terminology that is used between the best structures for research and one can see signs of that “Americanisation” of the training of young researchers. academic life which Max Weber diagnosed as The third report, which is now available, early as 1919. Be that as it may, however, the confirms a tradition that is coming into being identification of institutions and centres of aca- and extends the time series of published fig- demic excellence has also become a fixed ures. But it also undertakes to expand the base component of science policy in Germany, a data and to include new, revealing aspects of condition which will not likely change in the the world of research – internationalism, net- foreseeable future. work building and the international resonance It is therefore all the more important for of academic publications – in the analysis. the evaluations, which ultimately take the This is not intended to bring the discussion of form of ranking lists and make it possible to the evaluation of research, of the best-suited discuss them publicly, to define best practices, methods and indicators, to a close, but rather to make the methods and base data reliable to place it on a broader basis. and to find reference characteristics which We commend this report to the attention actually say something meaningful about the of all who are interested in science policy. And prime parameter “excellence”. The Deutsche to all who have been involved in its develop- Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Re- ment, we offer our thanks. Professor Dr. Ernst-Ludwig Winnacker Professor Dr. Klaus Landfried President of the President of the Association of Universities and Other Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Higher Education Institutions in Germany (German Research Foundation) (Hochschulrektorenkonferenz) 5 Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................15 2. Data Basis and Methodology 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................18 2.2 Data Basis................................................................................................................18 2.3 Subject Classification of Data ..................................................................................20 2.4 Institutional Classification of Data............................................................................22 2.5 Scale Factor Reference Values..................................................................................23 2.5.1 University Staff ........................................................................................................23 2.5.2 DFG Approval Groups..............................................................................................24 3. DFG approvals 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................26 3.2 Data Basis and Methodology....................................................................................26 3.3 General Significance of Third Party Funding Income to Universities ..........................29 3.4 Third Party Funding University Income According to Origin ......................................32 3.5 A Comparison of DFG Approvals and Third Party Funding Income at Universities ....35 3.6 Approvals to Universities..........................................................................................39 3.6.1 Approvals by Scientific Discipline and Research Area................................................39 3.6.2 Changes in Ranking Over the Course of Time..........................................................42 3.6.3 Approvals per Scientific Post....................................................................................44 3.7 Approvals to Non-University Research Institutions....................................................48 3.8 Regional Distribution of DFG Approvals ..................................................................51 4. Networked Research in DFG Coordinated Programmes 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................55 4.2 The DFG’s Coordinated Programmes........................................................................56 4.2.1 Programme Objectives.............................................................................................56 4.2.2 Participation in Coordinated Programmes by Research Area ....................................57 4.2.3 Participation in Coordinated Programmes by Institution...........................................58 4.3 Cooperation in Networks of DFG-funded Coordinated Programmes ........................60 4.3.1 Comments on the Methodology..............................................................................60
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The World at the Time of Messel: Conference Volume
    T. Lehmann & S.F.K. Schaal (eds) The World at the Time of Messel - Conference Volume Time at the The World The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 2011 Frankfurt am Main, 15th - 19th November 2011 ISBN 978-3-929907-86-5 Conference Volume SENCKENBERG Gesellschaft für Naturforschung THOMAS LEHMANN & STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL (eds) The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference Frankfurt am Main, 15th – 19th November 2011 Conference Volume Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung IMPRINT The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Conference Volume Publisher PROF. DR. DR. H.C. VOLKER MOSBRUGGER Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Editors DR. THOMAS LEHMANN & DR. STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected]; [email protected] Language editors JOSEPH E.B. HOGAN & DR. KRISTER T. SMITH Layout JULIANE EBERHARDT & ANIKA VOGEL Cover Illustration EVELINE JUNQUEIRA Print Rhein-Main-Geschäftsdrucke, Hofheim-Wallau, Germany Citation LEHMANN, T. & SCHAAL, S.F.K. (eds) (2011). The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates. 22nd International Senckenberg Conference. 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main. Conference Volume. Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main. pp. 203.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Census of Marine Life Participants 2000-2010
    Census of Marine Life Participants 2000-2010 Raza Abidi, Dalhousie University, Canada Jo Acebes, Asia Research Center, Philippines Arturo Acero, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia Shanta Nair Achuthankutty, National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research, India C.T. Achuthankutty, National Institute of Oceanography, India Colleen Adam, DIVERSITAS, France Sarah Adamowicz, University of Guelph, Canada Nathan Adams, United States Helena Adão, University of Évora, Portugal Adrian Aebischer, University of Bern and Museum Fribourg, Switzerland Steven Africk, Acentech Inc, United States Vikram Agadi, National Institute Scientific Communication & Information Resources, India Yogi Agrawal, Sequoia Scientific, United States Maite Aguado, Universidad Autonóma de Madrid, Spain Anelio Aguayo-Lobo, Instituto Antarctico Chileno, Chile Paula Aguiar, University of the Azores, Portugal John Ahearn, Museum Victoria, Australia Sayyed Ahmed, Sultan Qaboos University, Sultanate of Oman Shane Ahyong, National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA), New Zealand Jim Aiken, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, United Kingdom Cameron Ainsworth, University of British Columbia, Canada Laura Airoldi, Università di Bologna, Italy Belinda Aker, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom Dag Aksnes, University of Bergen, Norway Farid Al-Abdali, Five Oceans LLC, Sultanate of Oman Nasser Al-Azri, HMR Environmental Engineering Cunsultants, Sultanate of Oman Adnan Al-Azri, Sultan Qaboos University, Sultanate of Oman Monica Albuquerque, University Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Portugal Jacqueline Alder, UNEP, Kenya Viviana Alder, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina Juan Luis Aleget, Universitat de Girona, Spain Yaroslava Alekseeva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia Vera Alexander, University of Alaska Fairbanks, United States Karen Alexander, University of New Hampshire, United States Daniel Alexandrov, European University at St. Petersburg, Russia J.R.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundesbericht Forschung 2004
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 15/3300 15. Wahlperiode 17. 05. 2004 Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung Bundesbericht Forschung 2004 Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite Forschungspolitische Präambel . I Teil I Strukturen der deutschen Forschung und ihre Finanzierung . 1 Teil II Die Ressourcen für Wirtschaft, Forschung und Entwicklung in Deutschland und im internationalen Vergleich . 169 Teil III Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik des Bundes . 211 Teil IV Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik in den Ländern . 379 Teil V Innovationsindikatoren zur technologischen Leisungsfähigkeit Deutschlands . 473 Teil VI Internationale Zusammenarbeit in Forschung und Technologie . 521 Teil VII Tabellen/Statistiken . 595 Zugeleitet mit Schreiben des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung vom 14. Mai 2004 gemäß Beschluss des Deutschen Bundestages vom 23. Juni 1976 – Drucksache 7/5389. Deutscher Bundestag – 15. Wahlperiode Drucksache 15/3300 Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite Forschungspolitische Präambel I 1 Grundlinien II 1.1 Gründe für die staatliche Forschungsförderung III 1.2 Instrumente der Forschungsförderung IV 1.2.1 Institutionelle Förderung V 1.2.2 Projektförderung an der Schnittstelle Wissenschaft – Wirtschaft VI 1.2.3 Kompetenznetze und -zentren VI 1.2.4 Indirekte Förderung VII 1.3 Heute schon das Morgen denken VII 2 Aktuelle politische Ziele und Maßnahmen VIII 2.1 Die Aufgabe: Zukunftsinvestitionen steigern IX 2.2 Humanressourcen fördern und fordern IX 2.2.1 Ganztagsschulen – Zeit für mehr IX 2.2.2 Studierendenquote steigern X 2.2.3 Mit Spitzenuniversitäten
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations on Scientific Collections As Research Infrastructures
    wissenschaftsrat wr Drs. 10464-11 Berlin 28 January 2011 Recommendations on Scientific Collections as Research Infrastructures Contents Preamble 5 Summary 7 A. Scientific collections as research infrastructures 10 A.I Introduction 10 A.II Research based on scientific collections 11 A.III Definition of the subject matter 14 A.IV Definitions 15 A.V Aim of this statement 18 B. Critical analysis: status and function of scientific collections as research infrastructures 19 B.I Structural features 19 I.1 University collections 20 I.2 Non-university collections 23 B.II Resources 27 II.1 Finance 27 II.2 Accomodation 28 II.3 Human resources 29 B.III Use 30 III.1 Functions of scientific collections 30 III.2 Use for research 32 III.3 Intensity of use 33 B.IV Usability 33 IV.1 Management and quality assurance 34 IV.2 Care 35 IV.3 Access 35 IV.4 Documentation, indexing, digitisation 36 B.V Financial support options 39 B.VI Networking and coordination between institutions 41 C. Recommendations on the further development of scientific collections as research infrastructures 45 C.I Determining the status of a scientific collection 47 C.II Development of collection concepts 48 C.III Requirements for scientific collections as research infrastructure 50 III.1 Organisation and management 50 III.2 Resources 52 III.3 Indexing, accessibility, digitisation 53 C.IV Networking and organisation of scientific collections 55 C.V Financing and grants for scientific collections and collection-based research 57 Annexes 60 List of abbreviations 67 5 Preamble Scientific collections are a significant research infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leibniz Association Connects 89 Independent Re- - Manager, Librarian
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646 – 1716) The Leibniz Mission Research and Cooperation Philosopher, mathematician, universal academic, political advisor, scientific The Leibniz Association connects 89 independent re- - manager, librarian. Leibniz’ fundamen- tal notion of a close combination of Leibniz Institutes conduct problem-oriented research and one associate member. The research and science-based provide scientific infrastructures of national and interna theory and practice (theoria cum praxi) search and scientific infrastructure institutes, and has is evident in the work carried out by the tional importance. They foster close collaborations with - Leibniz Association today. In fact, Leib- universities, other research institutes, and industry in- niz Institutes engage in the entire spec- services they carry out are of national importance and Germany and abroad. Leibniz researchers uphold the hig trum of activities that Leibniz himself account for a major slice of Germany’s publicly-funded hest standards of excellence in their efforts to provide rese A. Scheits (1703) of painting by Copy ©GWLB pursued at the end of the 17th century. research potential. Leibniz Institutes are involved in more- arch-based solutions to the challenges facing society today.- than 3,400 contractual collaborations with international- - History partners in academia and industry, and some 5,600 for The Leibniz Association is a network of scientifically, legal The Leibniz Association eign scientists spend time researching at Leibniz Institu ly, and financially independent research institutes and ser- tes every year, contributing their expertise to output, too.- vice facilities which all adopt an interdisciplinary approach. Research topics range from the humanities, spatial rese Germany’s federal tradition has made its mark on the way Third-party funds of approx.
    [Show full text]
  • FORMATO PDF Ranking Instituciones No Acadã©Micas Por Sub áRea
    Ranking Instituciones No Académicas por sub área OCDE 2020 1. Cs. Naturales > 1.01 Matemáticas PAÍS INSTITUCIÓN RANKING PUNTAJE FRANCE Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 1 5,000 RUSSIA Russian Academy of Sciences 2 5,000 CHINA Chinese Academy of Sciences 3 5,000 FRANCE CNRS - National Institute for Mathematical Sciences (INSMI) 4 5,000 GERMANY Helmholtz Association 5 5,000 GERMANY Max Planck Society 6 5,000 USA United States Department of Energy (DOE) 7 5,000 FRANCE Inria 8 5,000 ITALY Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) 9 5,000 ITALY Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare 10 5,000 SPAIN Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC) 11 5,000 FRANCE CEA 12 5,000 RUSSIA Steklov Mathematical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences 13 5,000 POLAND Polish Academy of Sciences 14 5,000 FRANCE CNRS - Institute of Physics (INP) 15 5,000 FRANCE CNRS - Institute for Engineering & Systems Sciences (INSIS) 16 5,000 GERMANY Research Center Julich 17 5,000 USA Los Alamos National Laboratory 18 5,000 CZECH REPUBLIC Czech Academy of Sciences 19 5,000 ROMANIA National Institute for Laser, Plasma & Radiation Physics - Romania 20 5,000 ROMANIA Institute of Space Science 21 5,000 ARGENTINA Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET) 22 5,000 GERMANY European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) 23 5,000 ROMANIA Romanian Academy of Sciences 24 5,000 GERMANY Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis & Stochastics 25 5,000 CHINA University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS 26 5,000 UKRAINE National
    [Show full text]
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
    Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz e. V. - Leibniz-Gemeinschaft - Jahresbericht 2007 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite A. Verband und Geschäftsstelle 3 1. Einleitung 3 2. Senat und Präsidium 5 3. Außenvertretung 9 4. Strategische Weiterentwicklung 11 5. Leibniz-Institute im Wettbewerb 13 6. Nachwuchsförderung, Preise und Geschlechtergerechtigkeit 22 7. Europäische Forschungsförderung 27 8. Internationales 30 9. Sektionen, IVS, Verwaltungsausschuss 31 10. Wissenschaftliche Verbünde 33 11. Arbeitskreise 37 12. Geschäftsstelle 42 13. Administrative und rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen 46 14. Programmbudgets 50 15. Öffentlichkeitsarbeit 53 16. Jahr der Geisteswissenschaft 58 17. LeibnizX 59 B. Jahresbericht des Referats Evaluierung 62 C. Personalübersicht Geschäftsstelle und Referat Evaluierung 67 3 A. Verband und Geschäftsstelle 1. Einleitung Grundlage der Arbeit der Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz e. V. (Leibniz-Gemeinschaft) ist ihre Satzung in der aktuellen Fassung vom 24.11.2006. Danach sind die wichtigsten Aufgaben der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft: · die Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit der Mitgliedseinrich- tungen, · die Förderung des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses, · die Sicherung und Stärkung der Qualität, Leistungs- und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit ihrer Mitgliedseinrichtungen, insbesondere durch die Entwicklung und Durch- führung von Verfahren zur Leistungsbewertung, · die Wahrnehmung der gemeinsamen Anliegen gegenüber Bund, Ländern, den anderen Wissenschaftsorganisationen und gegenüber der Öffentlichkeit,
    [Show full text]
  • Green Museum – How to Practice What We Preach? 2016 SPNHC Conference
    GREEN MUSEUM – How to PRACTICE WHAT WE PREACH? 2016 SPNHC conference 31st Annual Meeting June 20–25, 2016 Berlin, Germany 2nd, revised edition GREEN MUSEUM – How to PRACTICE WHAT WE PREACH? 2016 SPNHC conference Access to research infrastructures SYNTHESYS offers unique research opportunities to scientists from all over Europe. Access is provided to: • European collections comprising more than half of the world’s natural history specimens st • world class libraries 31 Annual Meeting • state-of-the-art facilities including imaging, chemical, and molecular laboratories of the Society for the • support from in-house scientists, including researchers, facilities staff, and collections managers Participation is free of charge and is provided on the basis of scientific excellence of a proposal, Preservation of Natural reviewed by a Selection Panel. Priority is given to new users. A typical project is 1-6 weeks in duration. History Collections The 18 partner institutions offer access via 11 national Taxonomic Access Facilities (TAFs). AT-TAF: Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna DK-TAF: University of Copenhagen BE-TAF: Royal Belgian Institute of Natural ES-TAF: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales June 20–25, 2016 Sciences, Brussels; Royal Museum for & Real Jardín Botánico, Madrid Central Africa, Tervuren FR-TAF: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CZ-TAF: Národní Muzeum, Prague Paris Berlin, Germany DE-TAF: Botanischer Garten und Botanisches GB-TAF: Natural History Museum, London; Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Berlin; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Museum
    [Show full text]
  • Jahrbuch 2014 /Yearbook 2014 2 Inhalt Content
    Jahrbuch 2014 /Yearbook 2014 2 Inhalt Content 4/5 Vorwort/Foreword Prof. Dr.-Ing. Matthias Kleiner, Präsident der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft Prof. Dr.-Ing. Matthias Kleiner, President of the Leibniz Association 10/11 Leibniz auf dem Campus: Kooperationen mit Hochschulen/ Leibniz on Campus: Cooperating with Universities 16/17 Leibniz in Zahlen/Leibniz in Figures Institutsportraits/Short Profiles of all Leibniz Institutes 22 Sektion A – Geisteswissenschaften und Bildungsforschung Section A – Humanities and Educational Research 40 Sektion B – Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Raumwissenschaften Section B – Economics, Social Sciences, Spatial Research 58 Sektion C – Lebenswissenschaften Section C – Life Sciences 82 Sektion D – Mathematik, Natur- und Ingenieurwissenschaften Section D – Mathematics, Natural Sciences, Engineering 104 Sektion E – Umweltwissenschaften Section E – Environmental Research 114 Leibniz-Forschungsverbünde/Leibniz Research Alliances 126 Leibniz-WissenschaftsCampi/Leibniz ScienceCampi Anhang/Annex 134/135 Die Organisation der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft/ The Organisation of the Leibniz Association 136 Senat/Senate 140 Präsidium/Executive Board 142 Kontakt/Contact 144/145 Index/Index 148 Impressum/Imprint 150/152 Standorte aller Leibniz-Institute/Locations of all Leibniz Institutes 3 Liebe Leserinnen und Leser, Die Leibniz-Gemeinschaft ist die Heimat von inzwischen 89 Mitgliedsinstituten, die vielfältige erkenntnis- und anwen- dungsorientierte Grundlagenforschung betreiben und Infra- strukturen für die Forschung bereithalten. Dabei
    [Show full text]
  • List of Publications PD Dr. Dorte Janussen Peer-Reviewed Articles In
    List of Publications PD Dr. Dorte Janussen Peer-reviewed Articles in scientific journals Fengjie Li,; Pandey, P.; Janussen, D.; Chittiboyina, A.; Ferreira, D.; Tasdemir, D.: Tridiscorhabdin and Didiscorhabdin, the First Discorhabdin Oligomers Linked with a Direct C-N Bridge from the Sponge, Latrunculia biformis, Collected from the Deep-Sea in Antarctica.- Journal of Natural Products (in review). Fengjie Li, Janussen D., Tasdemir D. (2020): New Discorhabdin B Dimers with Anticancer Activity from the Antarctic Deep-Sea Sponge Latrunculia biformis.-Marine Drugs 2020, 18, 107-128 (doi:10.3390/md18020107) Federwisch, L., Janussen, D. & Richter, C. (2020): Macroscopic characteristics facilitate identification of common Antarctic glass sponges. Polar Biology, 43(2), 91-110 (DOI 10.1007/s00300-019-02612-2) Li Fengjie, Peifer C., Janussen D. &Tasdemir D. (2019): New Discorhabdin Alkaloids from the Antarctic Deep-Sea Sponge Latrunculia biformis.- Marine Drugs, 2019, 17, 439 (DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/md17080439) Li Lixia, Dorte Janussen, Renbin Zhan & Joachim Reitner (2019): Oldest known fossil Rossellids (Hexactinellida, Porifera) from the Ordovician–Silurian transition of Anhui, South China.- Paläontologische Zeitschrift, May 2019 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-019-00452-3) Steinert G., Wemheuer B., Janussen D., Erpenbeck D., Daniel R., Simon M., Brinkhoff T., Schupp P. J. (2019): Prokaryotic Diversity and Community Patterns in Antarctic Continental Shelf Sponges Frontiers in Marine Science, 05 June 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00297 Li F., Janussen D., Peifer C., Pérez-Victoria I., Tasdemir D. (2018): Targeted Isolation of Tsitsikammamines from the Antarctic Deep-sea Sponge Latrunculia biformis by Molecular Networking and Anticancer Activity.- Marine Drugs 2018, 16, 268; doi:10.3390/md16080268 Herzog S., Amon D.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrata of Messel Introduction
    Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg | 252 | 95 – 108 | | Frankfurt a. M., 09. 12. 2004 Fossilienfundstätte Messel Nr. 164 * An annotated taxonomic list of the Middle Eocene (MP 11) Vertebrata of Messel Michael MORLO, Stephan SCHAAL, Gerald MAYR & Christina SEIFFERT Abstract 132 vertebrate species are known from the Messel Fossil Site. In this paper, all species and genera are listed, and for each of them the first report from Messel is cited. Moreover, recent discoveries and current research projects are mentioned. The list thus reflects the state-of-the-art knowledge on the present taxonomic status of all vertebrate species and genera of Messel. Key words: Faunal list, Vertebrata, Eocene, Messel Kurzfassung 132 Wirbeltierarten sind derzeit aus der Fossilienfundstelle Grube Messel bekannt. Sie werden hier aufgeführt. Darüber hinaus werden jeweils erste Nachweise aus Messel, neue Funde sowie laufende Forschungsprojekte genannt, wodurch der aktuelle taxonomische Status der einzelnen Arten und Gattungen widergegeben wird. Schlüsselworte: Faunenliste, Vertebrata, Eozän, Messel Introduction flora. The invertebrates will be presented in a separate list (WEDMANN in prep.). A recent overview on the Bac- Comprehensive lists of Eocene organisms known from teria of Messel was provided by LIEBIG (1998) after results the World Heritage Messel Pit Fossil Site have been of biochemical (see KOENIGSWALD & MICHAELIS 1984) published several times, beginning with TOBIEN (1969 a) and morphological (WUTTKE 1983) analyses had been and KOENIGSWALD (1979), with updates in KOENIGSWALD published. These overviews provide not only quick access (1980 a) and KOENIGSWALD & MICHAELIS (1984). These to the relevant literature for a specific taxon, but may authors listed all plants and animals known at the time also serve as a taxonomic basis for the ongoing work on by their taxonomic names.
    [Show full text]
  • Type Specimens in the Bird Collections of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn
    Bonn zoological Bulletin Volume 59 pp. 29–77 Bonn, December 2010 Type specimens in the bird collections of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn Renate van den Elzen Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany; E-mail: [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Primary types play an important role as name-bearing of the ZFMK, Alexander Koenig, proposed eight new specimens (ICZN, 1999) in the context of correctly ad- names for birds, of which five are still recognized names dressing the whole spectrum of biodiversity. Names and of bird species or subspecies today (Dickinson 2003). thus taxonomy are the first step to identify and arrange the diversity of species in appropriate order. The impor- The taxa presented in the checklist include all name-bear- tance of type specimens requires that the information about ing types, without evaluating their present acceptance. So types should be made globally available. This was the we list not only currently recognized taxa, but also syn- main objective to present this checklist of syntypes, holo- onyms, regardless whether these are objective or subjec- types, lectotypes and paratypes (including paralectotypes) tive synonyms. The sequence of families follows the deposited in the skin collections of the ZFMK. A previ- Howard and Moore Checklist (Dickinson 2003). Also cur- ous list of types in the ZFMK (Rheinwald & van den Elzen rent names were added as a service as in some cases the 1984) can be seen as a first step. The list is outdated, in- original names cannot be assigned to current scientific bird complete and written in German only.
    [Show full text]