Food-Reactions of Pelomyxa Carolinensis Wilson
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AUTHORS ABSTRACT OF THIS PAPER ISSUED BY THE BIBLIOQRAPHIC SERVICE NOVEMBER 3. FOOD-REACTIONS OF PELOMYXA CAROLINENSIS WILSON WM. A. KEPNER AND J. GRAHAM EDWARDS University of Virginia FOURTEEN FIGURES C 0N T E N T S I. Introduction.. ....................... 11. Observations.,....................... A. Reactions to objects without associated currents of water-not capable of retreat.. ........................................ 383 1) Objects giving off oxygen. 2) Objects giving off carbon dioxide. B. Reactions to objects producing currents in water-capable of re- treat ....................................................... 385 1) General examples. 2) Example of change of physiological state on the part of both Pelomyxa and it.s prospective prey. 3) Reversal of reaction. 111. Discussion.. ................................................ IV. Summary ............................................................ 398 INTRODUCTION All food reactions of Pelomyxa involve movement. Ver- worn, Rhumbler, Loeb and others have seen in the analogy be- tween certain surface tension phenomena and the locomotion of Rhizopoda suggested experiments of t’he manner in which certain Lobosa travel. Dellinger (’06) and Jennings (’06), however, found that the movements of amoebae could not be interpreted so as to be explained in this wav. Jennings (’06) says: “As our account shows, most amoebae do not move at all as do liquid drops whose movements are produced through changes in surface tension,” page 5. Quite recently Mast and Root (’16) in an ingenious fashion have been able to show that surface tension is probably at best an insignificant factor in the process of feeding in amoeba,” page 48. 381 382 WM. A. KEPNER AND J. GRAHAM EDWARDS Wilson (’00)says : ‘‘ Occasionally a Pelomyxa was observed in the remarkable attitude shown in figure 5, a portion of the body resting on the bottom, while the rest of the animal divided into pseudopodia projected freely upward in the water. In this condition, Pelomyxa appears for the time being as an attached rhizopod with tentacle-like pseudopods, the nearest analogue to which is the interesting minute form, Hplamoeba sessilis, found by Frensel in Cordovn, in Argentina.” In this connection Wilson shows in his figures variously curved regions of the body, which suggest that there might have been local torsion or bending. Such torsion was observed by Mr. Conway Zirkle in this laboratory. He saw a specimen “sway one of its longer pseudopods through an arc of nearly 90 degrees back toward the thickcr region of the body. There was no percep- tible flow of the endoplasm in this pseudopod.” Oric of us has observed an arched specimen attached at its two ends standing with the plane of the arch at right angles to the surface. This attitude has been described by Wilson (’00). But in this case, the animal swayed to and fro upon the two bases of the arch, so that at one end of the oscillation it lay with the plane of the arch horizontal and directed toward the right, then after swaying through 180”, the plane of the arch lay horizontal and directed towards the left. More re- markable than this, however, has been the behavior of the specimen which was fixed by one pseudopod such as Wilson (’00) described. This specimen, standing upon the end of its body with its free end bearing three stout pseudopods, had its free end turn so as to inscribe a circular orbit countu-clock- wise. These observations indicate a differential contraction of the protoplasm, most likely the ectoplasm, which approxi- mates muscular activity and could scarcely be explained in terms of surface tension. There are obviously two classes of stimuli-chemical and physical-concerned in the response of rhizopoda to food. When, for example, an amoeba reacts to a desmid, that lies in the light, the stimulus arises from the oxygen and other ele- ments or compounds given off by the plant’s metabolism. On FOOD-REACTIONS OF PEL0,MYXA 383 the other hand a ciiiated object may produce physical stimula- tion through currents set up in the water as well as causing stimulation through the products of its metabolism. Schaeff er indicates that mere physical stimuli are responded to by amoeba. Schaeffer, (,l2), says : “All sorts of particles, whether digestible or not, are eaten if properly agitated. Not only is it unneces- sary for the agitated particle to lie in contact with the amoeba, but vibrations produced by a needle are likewise reacted to positively, if the needle point is one-fiftieth of a millimeter or more from the amoeba. We may be certain, therefore, that water vibrations proceeding from a definitely localized source are an efficient cause for successful feeding,” page 60. As a rule, the reactions of Pelomyxa to food fall into two general types. These types arise out of the non-motility or motility of the prey-the possibility of escape of the latter presenting a contingrncy, which to be successfully met, has led to a definite type of reaction. Great variability of reaction to food has been observed in Amoeba proteus hy Kepner and Taliaferro (,16), though but two classes of stimulation, concerned in the reaction of a rhizo- pod to food, can be recognized. We shall record at this point the following examples of the first type of food reactions. These descriptions of Pelomyxa’s behavior are taken from notes which were made at the time of observation by the authors and others who happened to take turns with us at the microscope as the reactions progressed. OBSERVATIONS A. Reactions to objects not capable of retreat November 4, 1916. A Pelomyxa moving in the direction of a green Eromosphaera encountered the spherical alga ec- centrically so as to turn it counter-clock-wise (as seen under the compound microscope) through about ten degrees. The Eromosphaera was not moved farther than this. The tip of the Pelomyxa’s pseudopod next expanded to fit intimately the 384 WM. A. KEPNER AND J. GRAHAM EDWARDS contour of the algal cell. This process continued until either a cup or an over arching of the Rhizopod’s protoplasm had advanced to the contour a-figure 1. The margin a then ad- vanced to contour b and beyond to margins c and c’ which had fused, bringing the spherical green cell within a closely fitting food vacuole. Within five minutes the Eromosphaera was rejected by the Pelomyxa. November 13, 1916. The specimen shown here reacting to two desmids, had taken through its dorsal surface two days previously a chilomonas and had unsuccessfully reacted to Paramaecium caudatum. This Pelomyxa came in contact with two rounded, green desmids A and B. Each desmid was then intimately surrounded and carried into the cytoplasm (fig. 2). Within five minutes, however, B was thrown out as 1 leaving a bi-forked cytoplasmic projection from which it had been dropped. Within ten minutes A had been ejected at 2 leaving a distinct cytoplasmic pocket as shown. In the above examples we have instances of Pelomyxas hav- ing ingested non-motile plants, which were giving off oxygen. These plants were sooner or later rejected; but this is not al- ways the case as the following observation shows. November 7, 1916. Messrs. F. L. Foster and C. Zirkle al- ternated with us in observing ‘a specimen that had been in a hanging drop containing long desmids and Euglenas. This specimen was pushing three non-motile Euglenas ahead of it and gliding by a fourth with which it was in contact. One of the Euglenas was ingested and retained. November 27, 1916. A specimen was travelling along in the direction of the two pseudopods 1 and 1’ as indicated by the arrows (fig. 3). Pseudopodl’ came in contact with a rounded bacterial mass within which were two kinds of ciliates. The longer type of ciliate was about the size of Loxocephalus granu- losus, but for these we had no time in which to determine the genera and species. When this contact with the mass of bacteria andof ciliat,es was made, a reversal of the course of pseudopod 1 occurred as indicated by arrow 2 and pseudopod 3 grew out over (above) the bacterial glcea and in this way ex- FOOD-REACTIONS OF PELOMYXA 385 erted enough pressure to cause one of the large ciliates to leave the glcea and swim beneath the body of Pelomyxa as indicated by the line 4. At 4-a it had escaped and a curtain of proto- plasm was thrown above it, driving it back beneath the body proper of Pelomyxa, from which it finally escaped along the path leading to the head-end of line 4. In the meantime pseudopods 1’ and 3 advanced around the sides and over the bact,erial glcea causing it to be stretched into a bi-lobed mass, the smaller lobe being squeezed out of the constricting region between the bases of the pseudopods. This smaller mass, con- taining two of the larger and nine of the smaller ciliates was eventually, completely constricted and rejected. The larger mass of the glcea was for the most part ingested by the means of the pseudopods 5 and 6’ (fig. 4) encircling about it as indicated by the contours 6 and 6’. As the tips of 6 and 6’ approached and fused, a minute mass of glcea containing one large and two small ciliates was constricted. Two portions of the original ciliate-containing glcea were thus at 11.20 a.m. rejected and the third and largest mass was ingested. After this largest mass had been ingested it was broken into small spheroidal masses, each of which was now contained in a separate food vacuole. At 12.15 p.m. the animal was just leaving the two rejected balls of bacterial glcea and showed many food vacuoles within which were active ciliates.