DOCSLIB.ORG

A Typology of Questions in Northeast Asia and Beyond

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Typology of Questions in Northeast Asia and Beyond A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond An ecological perspective Andreas Hölzl language Studies in Diversity Linguistics 20 science press Studies in Diversity Linguistics Editor: Martin Haspelmath In this series: 1. Handschuh, Corinna. A typology of marked-S languages. 2. Rießler, Michael. Adjective attribution. 3. Klamer, Marian (ed.). The Alor-Pantar languages: History and typology. 4. Berghäll, Liisa. A grammar of Mauwake (Papua New Guinea). 5. Wilbur, Joshua. A grammar of Pite Saami. 6. Dahl, Östen. Grammaticalization in the North: Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars. 7. Schackow, Diana. A grammar of Yakkha. 8. Liljegren, Henrik. A grammar of Palula. 9. Shimelman, Aviva. A grammar of Yauyos Quechua. 10. Rudin, Catherine & Bryan James Gordon (eds.). Advances in the study of Siouan languages and linguistics. 11. Kluge, Angela. A grammar of Papuan Malay. 12. Kieviet, Paulus. A grammar of Rapa Nui. 13. Michaud, Alexis. Tone in Yongning Na: Lexical tones and morphotonology. 14. Enfield, N. J. (ed.). Dependencies in language: On the causal ontology of linguistic systems. 15. Gutman, Ariel. Attributive constructions in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic. 16. Bisang, Walter & Andrej Malchukov (eds.). Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios. 17. Stenzel, Kristine & Bruna Franchetto (eds.). On this and other worlds: Voices from Amazonia. 18. Paggio, Patrizia and Albert Gatt (eds.). The languages of Malta. 19. Seržant, Ilja A. & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.). Diachrony of differential argument marking. 20. Hölzl, Andreas. A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond: An ecological perspective. ISSN: 2363-5568 A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond An ecological perspective Andreas Hölzl language science press Andreas Hölzl. 2018. A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond: An ecological perspective (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 20). Berlin: Language Science Press. This title can be downloaded at: http://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/174 © 2018, Andreas Hölzl This book is a revised version of a doctoral dissertation written at the University of Munich (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) that was defended in February 2017. Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (CC BY 4.0): http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN: 978-3-96110-102-3 (Digital) 978-3-96110-103-0 (Hardcover) ISSN: 2363-5568 DOI:10.5281/zenodo.1344467 Source code available from www.github.com/langsci/174 Collaborative reading: paperhive.org/documents/remote?type=langsci&id=174 Cover and concept of design: Ulrike Harbort Typesetting: Andreas Hölzl, Felix Kopecky, Sebastian Nordhoff Proofreading: Alec Shaw, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Amir Ghorbanpour, Benjamin Brosig, Jaime Peña, Jeroen van de Weijer, Linda Lanz, Ludger Paschen, Maksim Fedotov, Martin Haspelmath, Stefan Hartmann, Sune Gregersen Fonts: Linux Libertine, Libertinus Math, Arimo, DejaVu Sans Mono Typesetting software:Ǝ X LATEX Language Science Press Unter den Linden 6 10099 Berlin, Germany langsci-press.org Storage and cataloguing done by FU Berlin Für meine Eltern Margret und Wolfgang Contents Acknowledgments v Abbreviations vii 1 Introduction 1 2 An overview of language families in Northeast Asia 15 2.1 Ainuic ..................................... 19 2.2 Amuric (Nivkh) ................................ 20 2.3 Chukotko-Kamchatkan ............................ 20 2.4 Eskaleut (Eskimo-Aleut) ........................... 21 2.5 Indo-European ................................. 22 2.6 Japonic (Japanese-Ryūkyūan) ........................ 25 2.7 Koreanic .................................... 25 2.8 (Khitano-)Mongolic .............................. 26 2.9 Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan) ....................... 28 2.10 Tungusic .................................... 30 2.11 Turkic ...................................... 32 2.12 Uralic ...................................... 33 2.13 Yeniseic (Yeniseian) .............................. 34 2.14 Yukaghiric ................................... 34 3 Areal typology and Northeast Asia 37 3.1 Theoretical considerations .......................... 37 3.2 The Eurasian macro-area ........................... 41 3.3 Mainland Southeast Asia ........................... 41 3.4 Northeast Asia ................................. 43 3.5 Subareas in Northeast Asia .......................... 49 4 The typology of questions 53 4.1 Introduction to the typology of questions .................. 53 4.2 Question marking ............................... 56 4.2.1 Marking strategies .......................... 61 4.2.2 The scope of question marking ................... 70 4.2.3 Interaction of functional domains .................. 72 4.2.4 The number of markers ....................... 75 Contents 4.3 Interrogatives ................................. 76 4.3.1 Semantic scope of interrogatives .................. 80 4.3.2 Word class membership of interrogatives ............. 84 4.3.3 The diachrony of interrogatives ................... 85 4.3.4 Inflectional properties of interrogatives ............... 88 4.3.5 Interrogatives and demonstratives ................. 89 4.4 Towards an ecological theory of questions ................. 90 5 Survey of the grammars of questions in Northeast Asia 103 5.1 Ainuic ..................................... 103 5.1.1 Classification of Ainuic ........................ 103 5.1.2 Question marking in Ainuic ..................... 104 5.1.3 Interrogatives in Ainuic ....................... 109 5.2 Amuric ..................................... 113 5.2.1 Classification of Amuric ....................... 113 5.2.2 Question marking in Amuric .................... 114 5.2.3 Interrogatives in Amuric ....................... 117 5.3 Chukotko-Kamchatkan ............................ 120 5.3.1 Classification of Chukotko-Kamchatkan .............. 120 5.3.2 Question marking in Chukotko-Kamchatkan ........... 121 5.3.3 Interrogatives in Chukotko-Kamchatkan .............. 124 5.4 Eskaleut .................................... 128 5.4.1 Classification of Eskaleut ....................... 128 5.4.2 Question marking in Eskaleut .................... 128 5.4.3 Interrogatives in Eskaleut ...................... 136 5.5 Indo-European ................................. 140 5.5.1 Classification of Indo-European ................... 140 5.5.2 Question marking in Indo-European ................ 140 5.5.3 Interrogatives in Indo-European ................... 152 5.6 Japonic ..................................... 165 5.6.1 Classification of Japonic ....................... 165 5.6.2 Question marking in Japonic .................... 167 5.6.3 Interrogatives in Japonic ....................... 189 5.7 Koreanic .................................... 200 5.7.1 Classification of Koreanic ...................... 200 5.7.2 Question marking in Koreanic .................... 201 5.7.3 Interrogatives in Koreanic ...................... 214 5.8 Mongolic .................................... 217 5.8.1 Classification of Mongolic ...................... 217 5.8.2 Question marking in Mongolic ................... 219 5.8.3 Interrogatives in Mongolic ...................... 244 5.9 Trans-Himalayan ............................... 255 5.9.1 Classification of Trans-Himalayan ................. 255 ii Contents 5.9.2 Question marking in Trans-Himalayan ............... 256 5.9.3 Interrogatives in Trans-Himalayan ................. 274 5.10 Tungusic .................................... 284 5.10.1 Classification of Tungusic ...................... 284 5.10.2 Question marking in Tungusic ................... 286 5.10.3 Interrogatives in Tungusic ...................... 312 5.11 Turkic ...................................... 331 5.11.1 Classification of Turkic ........................ 331 5.11.2 Question marking in Turkic ..................... 333 5.11.3 Interrogatives in Turkic ....................... 354 5.12 Uralic ...................................... 363 5.12.1 Classification of Uralic ........................ 363 5.12.2 Question marking in Uralic ..................... 364 5.12.3 Interrogatives in Uralic ........................ 371 5.13 Yeniseic ..................................... 377 5.13.1 Classification of Yeniseic ....................... 377 5.13.2 Question marking in Yeniseic .................... 377 5.13.3 Interrogatives in Yeniseic ...................... 381 5.13.4 Dene-Yeniseian? ........................... 383 5.14 Yukaghiric ................................... 386 5.14.1 Classification of Yukaghiric ..................... 386 5.14.2 Question marking in Yukaghiric ................... 386 5.14.3 Interrogatives in Yukaghiric ..................... 392 6 Interrogative constructions in Northeast Asia: A summary 395 6.1 Question marking ............................... 395 6.1.1 Marking strategies .......................... 395 6.1.2 Semantic scope ............................ 398 6.1.3 Interaction of functional domains .................. 399 6.1.4 Borrowing ............................... 402 6.2 Interrogatives ................................. 405 6.2.1 Formal properties ........................... 405 6.2.2 Semantic scope ............................ 406 6.2.3 Diachrony of interrogatives ..................... 410 6.2.4 Borrowing ............................... 412 6.3 The significance of the grammar of questions ................ 412 6.4 An atlas of the grammar of questions in Northeast Asia .......... 418 7 Conclusion 435 Appendix A: Data for geographical maps 441 References 449 iii Contents Index 501 Name index ...................................... 501 Language
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Essay (PDF)
    Languages and Early Migration “Language Resources,” Cambridge University Press website Prologue This introduction to languages and early migration is reproduced from the online Language Resources that I created, linked to the website for my book, A History of Humanity. The main essay provides basic definitions on language, then summarizes language-group distribution, history, and debates, concluding with language spreadsheets and references. An example of phylum-level details is shown for Amerind, the original languages of North ands South America. Essay The purpose of this online resource collection is to interpret the place of language in human history. In a simplified presentation of a complex issue, this Introduction begins with concise definitions and descriptions. It traces the logical order of language divergence and displays the major phyla or families going back more than 15,000 years. After summarizing the history of language divergence and movement in six periods, we turn to the problems and debates in language history. These include the effects of “language overlays” as one replaces another, efforts to define “macro-phyla” for very early times, and early maritime migrations. The accompanying files for 14 individual phyla provide descriptions of each Homeland, language migrations over time, maps (which are also available as separate image files), concise spreadsheets showing major subgroups in each phylum, and citations of works on each phylum. In a separate Excel file, the 14 individual sheets each give a restatement of the concise spreadsheet at top and, below, a full spreadsheet showing many of the languages in each phylum. Definitions The elements of language, as understood by linguists, include lexicon (the meanings of words), morphology (the pieces of words and how they are fit together), phonology (the sounds made in any language), and syntax (the organization of lexicon, morphology, and phonology into meaningful sentences).
    [Show full text]
  • Vocabulary of Shingnyag Tibetan: a Dialect of Amdo Tibetan Spoken in Lhagang, Khams Minyag
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Prometheus-Academic Collections Asian and African Languages and Linguistics No.11, 2017 Vocabulary of Shingnyag Tibetan: A Dialect of Amdo Tibetan Spoken in Lhagang, Khams Minyag Suzuki, Hiroyuki IKOS, Universitetet i Oslo / National Museum of Ethnology Sonam Wangmo IKOS, Universitetet i Oslo Lhagang Town, located in Kangding Municipality, Ganzi Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China, is inhabited by many Tibetan pastoralists speaking varieties which are similar to Amdo Tibetan even though it is located at the Minyag Rabgang region of Khams, based on the Tibetan traditional geography. Among the multiple varieties spoken by inhabitants living in Lhagang Town, the Shingyag dialect is spoken in the south-western part of the town. It is somewhat different from other Amdo varieties spoken in Lhagang Town in the phonetic and phonological aspects. This article provides a word list with ca. 1500 words of Shingnyag Tibetan. Keywords: Amdo Tibetan, Minyag Rabgang, dialectology, migration pattern 1. Introduction 2. Phonological overview of Shingnyag Tibetan 3. Principal phonological features of Shingnyag Tibetan 1. Introduction This article aims to provide a word list (including ca. 1500 entries) with a phonological sketch of Shingnyag Tibetan, spoken in Xiya [Shing-nyag]1 Hamlet, located in the south-western part of Tagong [lHa-sgang] Town (henceforth Lhagang Town), Kangding [Dar-mdo] Municipality, Ganzi [dKar-mdzes] Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China (see Figure 1). Lhagang Town is in the easternmost part of Khams based on the traditional Tibetan geography, however, it is inhabited by many Tibetans whose mother tongue is Amdo Tibetan.2 Referring to Qu and Jin (1981), we can see that it is already known that Amdo-speaking Tibetans live in Suzuki, Hiroyuki and Sonam Wangmo.
    [Show full text]
  • Tibetan Vwa 'Fox' and the Sound Change Tibeto
    Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area Volume 29.2 — October 2006 TIBETAN VWA ‘FOX’ AND THE SOUND CHANGE TIBETO-BURMAN *WA > TIBETAN O Nathan W. Hill Harvard University Paul Benedict (1972: 34) proposed that Tibeto-Burman medial *-wa- regularly leads to -o- in Old Tibetan, but that initial *wa did not undergo this change. Because Old Tibetan has no initial w-, and several genuine words have the rhyme -wa, this proposal cannot be accepted. In particular, the intial of the Old Tibetan word vwa ‘fox’ is v- and not w-. འ Keywords: Old Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, phonology. 1. INTRODUCTION The Tibetan word vwa ‘fox’ has received a certain amount of attention for being an exception to the theory that Tibeto-Burman *wa yields o in Tibetan1. The first formulation of this sound law known to me is Laufer’s statement “Das Barmanische besitzt nämlich häufig die Verbindung w+a, der ein tibetisches [sic] o oder u entspricht [Burmese namely frequently has the combination w+a, which corresponds to a Tibetan o or u]” (Laufer 1898/1899: part III, 224; 1976: 120). Laufer’s generalization was based in turn upon cognate sets assembled by Bernard Houghton (1898). Concerning this sound change, in his 1972 monograph, Paul Benedict writes: “Tibetan has initial w- only in the words wa ‘gutter’, wa ‘fox’ and 1 Here I follow the Wylie system of Tibetan transliteration with the exception that the letter (erroneously called a-chung by some) is written in the Chinese fashion འ as <v> rather than the confusing <’>. On the value of Written Tibetan v as [ɣ] cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Hokkaido Ainu Dialects: Variation from the Perspective of the Geographical Distribution of Vocabulary
    Hokkaido Ainu Dialects: Variation from the Perspective of the Geographical Distribution of Vocabulary Mika FUKAZAWA Preparatory Office for National Ainu Museum (The foundation for Ainu culture) 1 INTRODUCTION • The aim of this study is to generate geographical maps and to describe the variations in Hokkaido Ainu dialects. • The Ainu language has three dialect categories: Hokkaido, Sakhalin, and Northern Kurils. • It is well known that “for Hokkaido, there are some differences in vocabulary, phonology, word formation, and the like between northeastern and southwestern dialects” (Tamura 2000: 3) 2 INTRODUCTION The Kamchatka Peninsula Sakhalin The Kuril Islands Hokkaido Honshu 3 INTRODUCTION • Regarding the Ainu dialects, the most important work on them was conducted by Hattori, Chiri, and their collaborators from 1955–1956. • Currently, few native speakers of Ainu exist, and collecting sufficient words and sentences through fieldwork is difficult. • My studies adopted geolinguistics for the Ainu language, referring to the audio and written materials that Hattori, Chiri, and other researchers have collected. 4 THE ATLAS OF AINU DIALECTS 5 AINU DIALECTS Hokkaido: 1. Yakumo/ 2. Oshamambe/ 3. Horobetsu/ 4. Biratori (Fukumitsu)/ 5. Nukibetsu/ 6. Niikappu/ 7. Samani/ 8. Obihiro/ 9. Kushiro/ 10. Bihoro/ 11. Asahikawa/ 12. Nayoro/ 13. Sōya/ 14. Chitose/ 15. Shizunai/ 16. Hombetsu/ 17. Mukawa/ 18. Nemuro Sakhalin: 19. Ochiho/ 20. Tarantomari/ 21. Maoka/ 22. Shiraura/ 23. Raichishka/ 24. Nairo Kurils: 25. Shumushu 6 INTRODUCTION • Nakagawa (1996) first suggested the geographical distribution and several patterns of Ainu. • Here, I consider the following major three types within Hokkaido Ainu dialects. • The Eastern-Western type • The Saru-Chitose (and Sakhalin) type • The ABA type 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SHS Idea Share Handbook 2013 SDC Idea Share Submissions Thank You to Everyone Who Contributed to This Year’S Idea Share
    2013 ALT Skill Development Conference Kagoshima SHS Idea Share Handbook 2013 SDC Idea Share Submissions Thank you to everyone who contributed to this year’s idea share. The following ideas are presented in alphabetical order by surname. Both the JHS and SHS Idea Share Handbooks can be found online at www.kagoshimajet.com/team-teaching-tips/ Teacher: Takahiro Arimura BOE/School: Kinkowan High School Title: Whose name is on your forehead? Objective: Get used to the usage of relative nouns Grade Level: SHS Skill Focus: Speaking/ Grammar Summary: Have the students get into groups of 3 or 4 people. Give each student a piece of paper. Each student writes a person’s name on it (any person will be ok). Then, each student gives the piece of paper to the student to his or her left in the same group. In this case, they have to take care not to see the name of the person on the given piece of paper. They put the piece of paper on their forehead so that everyone else can see the name. They take turns to ask the other students for hints to find out whose name is on it. When asking, the question form must include relative clauses: Is this the person who~?; Is this the person whom~? and so on. The first student who has found out the name of the person on their forehead is the winner. Teacher: Terrance Brown BOE/School: Okuchi SHS Title: Sentence Hunt Objective: Review grammar patterns Grade Level: JHS/SHS Skill Focus: Reading/Writing/Speaking/Listening Summary: Before the class prepare a series of sentences that are either based around a grammar point or a format that you are looking to teach your students.
    [Show full text]
  • Drastic Demographic Events Triggered the Uralic Spread to Appear in Diachronica
    Drastic demographic events triggered the Uralic spread To appear in Diachronica Riho Grünthal (University of Helsinki) Volker Heyd (University of Helsinki) Sampsa Holopainen (University of Helsinki) Juha Janhunen (University of Helsinki) Olesya Khanina (Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences) Matti Miestamo (University of Helsinki) Johanna Nichols (University of California, Berkeley; University of Helsinki; Higher School of Economics, Moscow) Janne Saarikivi (University of Helsinki) Kaius Sinnemäki (University of Helsinki) Abstract: The widespread Uralic family offers several advantages for tracing prehistory: a firm absolute chronological anchor point in an ancient contact episode with well-dated Indo-Iranian; other points of intersection or diagnostic non-intersection with early Indo-European (the Late PIE-speaking Yamnaya culture of the western steppe, the Afanasievo culture of the upper Yenisei, and the Fatyanovo culture of the middle Volga); lexical and morphological reconstruction sufficient to establish critical absences of sharings and contacts. We add information on climate, linguistic geography, typology, and cognate frequency distributions to reconstruct the Uralic origin and spread. We argue that the Uralic homeland was east of the Urals and initially out of contact with Indo-European. The spread was rapid and without widespread shared substratal effects. We reconstruct its cause as the interconnected reactions of early Uralic and Indo-European populations to a catastrophic climate change episode and interregionalization opportunities which advantaged riverine hunter-fishers over herders. Keywords Uralic; Finno-Ugric; Indo-European; Yamnaya; Indo-Iranian; Siberia; Eurasia; Seima-Turbino, 4.2 ka event; linguistic homeland Note: In-text references have not yet been fully deanonymized. 2 Drastic demographic events triggered the Uralic spread (Contents, for convenience) Main text (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Languages of Israel : Policy Ideology and Practice Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THE LANGUAGES OF ISRAEL : POLICY IDEOLOGY AND PRACTICE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Bernard Spolsky | 312 pages | 25 Oct 1999 | Channel View Publications Ltd | 9781853594519 | English | Bristol, United Kingdom The Languages of Israel : Policy Ideology and Practice PDF Book Taken together, these critical perspectives and emerging emphases on ideology, ecology, and agency are indeed rich resources for moving the LPP field forward in the new millenium. Discover similar content through these related topics and regions. Urry , John. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. Modern Language Journal, 82, Skip to main content. Related Middle East and North Africa. Costa , James W. Fettes , p. Musk , Nigel. Language teaching and language revitalization initiatives constitute pressing real world LPP concerns on an unprecedented scale. In Arabic, and not only in Hebrew. Robert , Elen. By Muhammad Amara. Progress in Language Planning: International Perspectives. These publications have become classics in the field, providing accounts of early empirical efforts and descriptive explorations of national LPP cases. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Back from the brink: The revival of endangered languages. As noted above, Cooper introduces acquisition planning as a third planning type , pp. Thanks to British colonization, English used to be one of the official languages of what would become the independent state of Israel, but this changed after Meanwhile, a series of contributions called for greater attention to the role of human agency, and in particular bottom-up agency, in LPP e. Ricento , Thomas K. Office for National Statistics. Jeffries , Lesley , and Brian Walker. Language planning and language ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • The POSS-Final Suffix Order in Dagur∗
    The POSS-Final Suffix Order in Dagur Gong The POSS-Final Suffix Order in Dagur∗ 2 Background on Dagur • Dagur is an endangered Mongolic language of northern China spoken by about 132,000 people Mia Zhiyu Gong, Cornell University with 24,300 monolinguals (Ethnologue 2019). [email protected] • There are four (mutually-intelligible) dialects of Dagur: Buteha, Qiqihar, Hailar, and Ili/Xinjiang. The 50th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society • The data in this paper comes from Buteha and Hailar dialects. October 26, 2019 2.1 Background on Dagur Nominal Morphology ................................................... ......................................... • The head noun can be followed by three types of suffixes (in this order): PL, CASE, POSS. 1 Introduction j • This talk: (2) Merden (minii) guˇc -sul -d -min ˇašGen ši -sen Merden 1S.GEN friend -PL -DAT -1S.POSS letter write -PST ⊲ Dagur possessive constructions ‘Merden wrote a letter/letters to my friends’ ⊲ The stem-CASE-POSS (POSS-final) order as in (1)1 (1) Merden (maanii) guˇc -d -maan j ˇašGen ši -san • The basic possessive morphology in Dagur is illustrated with (3): Merden 1PL.GEN friend -DAT -1PL.POSS letter write -PST (3) a. (minii) biteG -min j b. *minii biteG ‘Merden wrote a letter to our friend’ 1S.GEN book -1S.POSS • In (1) ‘my book’ ⊲ The DP our friend is marked for dative case ⊲ There is person and number agreement between the possessor (marked as genitive case) and the ⊲ The dative marker precedes the 1PL.POSS suffix possessive (POSS) suffix. ⊲ • All (attested) case and POSS suffix in all person-number combination follow this order 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Against Official Monolingualism: the Idiosyncrasies of Minority Language Rights in Israel and the United States
    THE CASE AGAINST OFFICIAL MONOLINGUALISM: THE IDIOSYNCRASIES OF MINORITY LANGUAGE RIGHTS IN ISRAEL AND THE UNITED STATES Yuval Merin * I. INTRODUCTION ....................................... 1 H. THE NATURE AND HISTORY OF LANGUAGE DIVERSITY IN ISRAEL AND THE UNITED STATES ....................... 3 III. THE LEGAL STATUS OF LANGUAGES IN ISRAEL AND THE UNITED STATES ................................... 9 A. The Status of English and the Absence of an Official Language in the United States ........................ 9 B. FormalBilingualism and the Status of Hebrew, Arabic, and English in Israel .............................. 11 1. The Legal Status of Hebrew ...................... 14 2. The Legal Status of English ...................... 15 3. The Legal Status ofArabic ...................... 15 C. Comparative Observations ......................... 18 IV. "OFFICIAL LANGUAGE:" IMPLICATIONS AND MOVEMENTS .... 20 A. The Implications of "Official Language " .............. 22 B. "Hebrew-Only" Trends in Israel in Comparisonto the "English-Only" Movement in the United States ...... 25 C. Linguistic Requirements and Practicesin the Field of Education ..................................... 30 V. LINGUISTIC MINORITIES AND LANGUAGE RIGHTS AS CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS ................... 34 VI. CONCLUSION ........................................ 48 I. INTRODUCTION Both Israel and the United States are multi-ethnic societies with a large percentage of linguistic minorities. Hebrew and Arabic are the two official languages of Israel whereas the United States lacks an official language at the J.S.D. Candidate, New York University School of Law; LL.M., New York University School of Law, 1997; LL.B., The Hebrew University of Jerusalem School of Law, 1993. The author would like to thank Prof. Rachel Moran of Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, for her insightful and helpful comments on previous drafts of this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Vowel Devoicing of Ainu -How It Differs and Not Differs from Vowel Devoicing of Japanese-*
    Vowel Devoicing of Ainu -How it differs and not differs from Vowel Devoicing of Japanese-* Hidetoshi Shiraishi University of Groningen 1 Introduction The oldest description of Vowel Devoicing (henceforth VD) of Ainu dates back to the earliest stages of linguistic research of the language (Kindaichi 1931, Chiri 1936, 1942). Nevertheless, our knowledge of the phenomenon has not been deepened since then. For instance, we still know little about the exact phonological environment for VD to occur, or its distribution in actual speech. This situation contrasts sharply with that of Japanese, the geographic neighbor of Ainu, where VD has always been one of the most appealing phonological topics among linguists. Numerous investigations were conducted from various linguistic fields for more than a century long. The present work is an attempt to fill this gap. It is still preliminary in nature. As a primary source, I have used sound recordings of only two speakers of a single dialect. My first task was to check VD in these recordings in order to verify whether previous works were adequate in their description. Except for a couple of recent descriptions (Tamura 1997, 1998), there were no studies that tackled this issue using sound materials in the first place. I will therefore compare the results of my investigation with those previous descriptions. Another interesting issue is whether VD of Ainu shares characteristics with VD of Japanese. Considering those facts that 1) these two languages have * Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the meetings of the Tsukuba Circle of Phonologists (July 2000), Chiba University Eurasian Society (March 2001) and De Dag van Fonetiek (December 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • "Evolution of Human Languages": Current State of Affairs
    «Evolution of Human Languages»: current state of affairs (03.2014) Contents: I. Currently active members of the project . 2 II. Linguistic experts associated with the project . 4 III. General description of EHL's goals and major lines of research . 6 IV. Up-to-date results / achievements of EHL research . 9 V. A concise list of actual problems and tasks for future resolution. 18 VI. EHL resources and links . 20 2 I. Currently active members of the project. Primary affiliation: Senior researcher, Center for Comparative Studies, Russian State University for the Humanities (Moscow). Web info: http://ivka.rsuh.ru/article.html?id=80197 George Publications: http://rggu.academia.edu/GeorgeStarostin Starostin Research interests: Methodology of historical linguistics; long- vs. short-range linguistic comparison; history and classification of African languages; history of the Chinese language; comparative and historical linguistics of various language families (Indo-European, Altaic, Yeniseian, Dravidian, etc.). Primary affiliation: Visiting researcher, Santa Fe Institute. Formerly, professor of linguistics at the University of Melbourne. Ilia Publications: http://orlabs.oclc.org/identities/lccn-n97-4759 Research interests: Genetic and areal language relationships in Southeast Asia; Peiros history and classification of Sino-Tibetan, Austronesian, Austroasiatic languages; macro- and micro-families of the Americas; methodology of historical linguistics. Primary affiliation: Senior researcher, Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow / Novosibirsk). Web info / publications list (in Russian): Sergei http://www.inslav.ru/index.php?option- Nikolayev =com_content&view=article&id=358:2010-06-09-18-14-01 Research interests: Comparative Indo-European and Slavic studies; internal and external genetic relations of North Caucasian languages; internal and external genetic relations of North American languages (Na-Dene; Algic; Mosan).
    [Show full text]
  • The Lawu Languages
    The Lawu languages: footprints along the Red River valley corridor Andrew Hsiu ([email protected]) https://sites.google.com/site/msealangs/ Center for Research in Computational Linguistics (CRCL), Bangkok, Thailand Draft published on December 30, 2017; revised on January 8, 2018 Abstract In this paper, Lawu (Yang 2012) and Awu (Lu & Lu 2011) are shown to be two geographically disjunct but related languages in Yunnan, China forming a previously unidentified sub-branch of Loloish (Ngwi). Both languages are located along the southwestern banks of the Red River. Additionally, Lewu, an extinct language in Jingdong County, may be related to Lawu, but this is far from certain due to the limited data. The possible genetic position of the unclassified Alu language in Lüchun County is also discussed, and my preliminary analysis of the highly limited Alu data shows that it is likely not a Lawu language. The Lawu (alternatively Lawoid or Lawoish) branch cannot be classified within any other known branch or subgroup or Loloish, and is tentatively considered to be an independent branch of Loloish. Further research on Lawu languages and surrounding under-documented languages would be highly promising, especially on various unidentified languages of Jinping County, southern Yunnan. Table of contents Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Lawu 3. Awu 4. Lewu Yao: a possible relative of Lawu 5. Alu: a Lalo language rather than a Lawu language 6. Conclusions 7. Final remarks: suggestions for future research References Appendix 1: Comparative word list of Awu, Lawu, and Proto-Lalo Appendix 2: Phrase list of Lewu Yao Appendix 3: Comparative word list of Yi lects of Lüchun County 1 1.
    [Show full text]