DOCSLIB.ORG

LAGUARDIA AIRPORT TETERBORO AIRPORT DOWNTOWN MANHATTAN HELIPORT You're Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LAGUARDIA AIRPORT TETERBORO AIRPORT DOWNTOWN MANHATTAN HELIPORT You're Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. 1998 Airport Traf f ic Report ......................................................................................................... JOHN F. KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NEWARK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LAGUARDIA AIRPORT TETERBORO AIRPORT DOWNTOWN MANHATTAN HELIPORT You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. F ACT SHEETS John F. Kennedy International Airport .....................................................................................................................1 Newark International Airport ....................................................................................................................................2 LaGuardia Airport.......................................................................................................................................................3 Downtown Manhattan Heliport/Teterboro Airport...............................................................................................4 1. AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS Commercial and Non-Commercial Aircraft Movements 1.1.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport and Region ..............................................................................................5 1.1.2 Monthly Totals 1998, by Airport and Region ...................................................................................................10 Helicopter Movements 1.2.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport, Heliport and Region ............................................................................15 1.2.2 Monthly Totals 1997-1998, by Airport, Heliport and Region..........................................................................16 Aircraft Movements By Market 1.3.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport and Region ............................................................................................17 Maps Cities Served – Scheduled Non-Stop Service by Airport..............................................................................................22 2. PASSENGER TRAFFIC Top Fifteen Airport Comparisons 2.1.1 Number of Passengers–1998 .............................................................................................................................33 2.1.2 Number of Passengers, Worldwide–1998..........................................................................................................34 Commercial Passenger Traffic 2.2.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport and Region ............................................................................................35 2.2.2 Monthly Totals 1998, by Airport and Region ...................................................................................................39 Passenger Traffic in Helicopters 2.3.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport, Heliport and Region ............................................................................43 2.3.2 Monthly Totals 1997-1998, by Airport, Heliport and Region..........................................................................44 Passenger Traffic By Market 2.4.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport and Region ............................................................................................45 Passenger Traffic By Airline 2.5.1 Top 10 Carriers, 1998 Passengers, by Airport and Region ...............................................................................47 Passenger Traffic by Terminal 2.6.1 1998 Passengers, Domestic and International by Airport .................................................................................49 Top 25 Origins/Destinations 2.7.1 Scheduled Airlines, 1998, Domestic by Airport and Region .............................................................................50 2.7.2 Scheduled Airlines, 1998, International by Airport and Region ........................................................................54 Passenger Demographics 2.8.1 Profile of Departing Passengers, by Airport and Region....................................................................................57 i You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. 3. CARGO TRANSPORT Top Fifteen Airport Comparisons 3.1.1 Revenue Cargo in Short Tons, 1998 .................................................................................................................59 3.1.2 Revenue Cargo in Short Tons, Worldwide, 1998 ..............................................................................................60 Revenue Freight In Short Tons 3.2.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport and Region ............................................................................................61 3.2.2 Monthly Totals 1998, by Airport and Region ...................................................................................................62 3.3.1 By International Market, Annual Totals 1989-1997, for Region.......................................................................63 3.3.2 U.S. Trading Districts by Air, 1998 ...................................................................................................................64 3.3.3 Air Trade Commodities in the NY/NJ Region, 1998.......................................................................................65 Revenue Freight by Airlines 3.4.1 Top 10 Carriers 1998, by Airport and Region...................................................................................................66 Revenue Mail In Short Tons 3.5.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport and Region ............................................................................................68 3.5.2 Monthly Totals 1998, by Airport and Region ...................................................................................................69 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES Airport Bus Passengers 4.1.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport and Region ............................................................................................71 4.1.2 Monthly Totals 1997-1998, by Airport and Region..........................................................................................72 Paid Parked Cars 4.2.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport and Region ............................................................................................73 4.2.2 Monthly Totals 1997-1998, by Airport and Region..........................................................................................74 Subway and New Jersey Transit 4.3.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport and Region ............................................................................................75 4.3.2 Monthly Totals 1997-1998, by Airport and Region..........................................................................................76 Airport Employment 4.4.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport and Region ............................................................................................77 Estimated Annual Payroll 4.5.1 Annual Totals 1985-1998, by Airport and Region ............................................................................................78 The Economic Impact of the Aviation Industry 4.6.1 1998 Totals for the New York/New Jersey Region...........................................................................................79 APPENDIX Glossary......................................................................................................................................................................81 Credits ........................................................................................................................................................................82 ii You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. John F. Kennedy International Airport ............................................................................................................................. OPERATED BY parking garages, that will connect with a Terminal 9 serves American’s domestic and John F. Kennedy International Airport light rail network that will link the passenger Puerto Rico destinations and is connected (JFK) is operated by The Port Authority terminals and connect with the city subway to the international terminal. of New York and New Jersey, under a lease and Long Island railroad. Tower Air has invested more than $10 with the City of New York since June 1, million dollars in its headquarters at JFK, 1947. CENTRAL TERMINAL AREA including its offices in Hangar 17, the reno- JFK has nine airline passenger terminals in vating and expanding of Building 213 for its LOCATION the center of the airport, surrounded by a new terminal in 1993, and in 1995 construct- ing a new finger with three additional gates. JFK International is located in the south- dual ring of peripheral taxiways. Initially eastern section of Queens County, New 655 acres, the Central Terminal Area (CTA) Approximately 125 domestic and inter- York City, on Jamaica Bay. It is fifteen miles was enlarged to 880 acres by relocation of national carriers serve JFK International. by highway from midtown Manhattan. the taxiways to provide space needed for expansion of the passenger terminals. There Air Traffic Control Tower SIZE are about 173 aircraft gate positions serving The modern Air Traffic Control Tower, the various terminals. The Central Terminal built in 1994, soars 321 feet tall and JFK consists of 4,930 acres, including 880 Area facilities also include a central heating includes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Teterboro Airport HIGH
    NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack Noise Teterboro Airport Sensitivity HIGH KTEB Teterboro, New Jersey, United States Level: Diagram #1: TEB Noise Monitor Locations All Aircraft Categories / All Runways © Whispertrack™ 2009-2021. All rights reserved. p. 1 of 11 Generated 30 Sep 2021 at 15:15 UTC http://whispertrack.com/airports/KTEB NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack Noise Teterboro Airport Sensitivity HIGH KTEB Teterboro, New Jersey, United States Level: Diagram #2: Dalton Two Departure for Runway 19 Aircraft Categories: A, B, C, D & E / Runway 19 © Whispertrack™ 2009-2021. All rights reserved. p. 2 of 11 Generated 30 Sep 2021 at 15:15 UTC http://whispertrack.com/airports/KTEB NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack Noise Teterboro Airport Sensitivity HIGH KTEB Teterboro, New Jersey, United States Level: Diagram #3: Runway 19 RNAV Offset Approach Aircraft Categories: A, B, C, D & E / Runway 19 © Whispertrack™ 2009-2021. All rights reserved. p. 3 of 11 Generated 30 Sep 2021 at 15:15 UTC http://whispertrack.com/airports/KTEB NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack Noise Teterboro Airport Sensitivity HIGH KTEB Teterboro, New Jersey, United States Level: Diagram #4: Runway 19 RNAV Offset Approach Aircraft Categories: A, B, C & D / Runway 19 © Whispertrack™ 2009-2021. All rights reserved. p. 4 of 11 Generated 30 Sep 2021 at 15:15 UTC http://whispertrack.com/airports/KTEB NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack Noise Teterboro Airport Sensitivity HIGH KTEB Teterboro, New Jersey, United States Level: Diagram #5: TEB Helicopter Routes Aircraft Category HELI © Whispertrack™ 2009-2021. All rights reserved. p. 5 of 11 Generated 30 Sep 2021 at 15:15 UTC http://whispertrack.com/airports/KTEB NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack Noise Teterboro Airport Sensitivity HIGH KTEB Teterboro, New Jersey, United States Level: OVERVIEW Teterboro Airport (TEB) is a noise sensitive airport due to the proximity of residential communities.
    [Show full text]
  • CAA Filed Comments
    BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. COVID-19 Related Relief Concerning Operations at Chicago O’Hare International Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport, Los Angeles International Airport, Newark Liberty International Airport, New York LaGuardia Airport, Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, and San Francisco International Airport for the Winter 2020/2021 Scheduling Season Docket No. FAA-2020-0862 RESPONSE OF THE CARGO AIRLINE ASSOCIATION INTRODUCTION The Cargo Airline Association is the leading organization representing the U.S. all-cargo air carrier industry.1 We are writing in response to Proposed Extension of Limited Waiver of the Minimum Slot Usage Requirement at certain enumerated airports for the Winter 2020/2021 scheduling season published in the September 15, 2020, edition of the Federal Register (85 Fed. Reg. 57288). The FAA’s proposed action would extend the limited waiver of the minimum slot usage requirements (with some restrictions) at John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), New York LaGuardia Airport (LGA) and Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) until March 27, 2021. The proposal would also extend the FAA’s coronavirus-related policy for 1 All-cargo airline members include: ABX Air, Atlas Air, FedEx Express, Kalitta Air and UPS Airlines. prioritizing flights canceled at designated International Air Transport Association (IATA) Level 2 airports in the United States – only through December 31, 2020.2 Our members are fully aware of the daunting operating challenges facing both airports and airlines in an environment poisoned by the COVID-19 coronavirus. We appreciate the actions taken by the United States government to address the many challenges impacting the aviation sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Service Incentive Program
    ASIP5 AIR SERVICE INCENTIVE PROGRAM MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT THE MIA AIR SERVICE INCENTIVE PROGRAM INTRODUCTION: The Miami-Dade Aviation Department (MDAD), op- destination (city) from MIA will qualify for 100% erator of Miami International Airport (MIA), is pleased abatement of landing fees on the new service, for a to offer ASIP5, the latest and most dynamic of its air 12-month Promotional Period. The service must be service incentive programs. The MIA ASIP5 comple- operated for 12 consecutive months. The incen- ments the strategies and objectives of the airport’s tive is available for any domestic U.S or Cana- air service development efforts while encouraging in- dian city pair regardless of present service levels cumbent carriers at MIA to consider expansion and to and from MIA by the applicant carrier or an- new market development. other carrier on that specific route. MIA OBJECTIVES: 2. New International Passenger Air Service: A. Any air carrier establishing scheduled, year-round • Stimulate domestic and international passenger passenger service to an international destination (city air service at MIA and / or airport) not currently served from MIA by any • Stimulate international freighter service to MIA carrier, will qualify for 100% abatement of landing • Increase non-aeronautical revenues at MIA fees on the qualifying service, for a 12-month Pro- • Reduce costs per enplaned passenger at MIA motional Period. Any secondary airports within the same destination will be deemed a new interna- ASIP5 PROGRAM COMPONENTS: tional route and will qualify for the incentive. For example, a carrier commencing London-Gatwick The MIA ASIP5 offers features that include: service will qualify for the incentive even though • An incentive for domestic passenger routes and MIA is already served from London-Heathrow.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    USCA Case #11-1018 Document #1351383 Filed: 01/06/2012 Page 1 of 12 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 8, 2011 Decided January 6, 2012 No. 11-1018 REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC., PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Transportation Christopher T. Handman argued the cause for the petitioner. Robert E. Cohn, Patrick R. Rizzi and Dominic F. Perella were on brief. Timothy H. Goodman, Senior Trial Attorney, United States Department of Transportation, argued the cause for the respondent. Robert B. Nicholson and Finnuala K. Tessier, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, Paul M. Geier, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation, and Peter J. Plocki, Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Litigation, were on brief. Joy Park, Trial Attorney, United States Department of Transportation, entered an appearance. USCA Case #11-1018 Document #1351383 Filed: 01/06/2012 Page 2 of 12 2 Before: HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, and WILLIAMS and RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Republic Airline Inc. (Republic) challenges an order of the Department of Transportation (DOT) withdrawing two Republic “slot exemptions” at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (Reagan National) and reallocating those exemptions to Sun Country Airlines (Sun Country). In both an informal letter to Republic dated November 25, 2009 and its final order, DOT held that Republic’s parent company, Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. (Republic Holdings), engaged in an impermissible slot-exemption transfer with Midwest Airlines, Inc. (Midwest).
    [Show full text]
  • TETERBORO TERMINAL (TEB) South Terminal
    TETERBORO TERMINAL (TEB) South Terminal NEW YORK CITY IS HOME TO MORE MILLIONAIRES THAN ANY OTHER CITY IN THE WORLD1 1M+ #1 9K+ 44 56% FORTUNE 500 OF NEW YORK CITY PRIVATE MILLIONAIRE MOST HIGH NET ULTRA HIGH NET- JET TRAVELERS HAVE USED A HOUSEHOLDS WORTH INDIVIDUALS WORTH INDIVIDUALS HEADQUARTERS2 PRIVATE JET FOR IN NEW YORK CITY1 OF ANY CITY IN THE WORLD1 IN NEW YORK CITY1 BUSINESS IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS3 Sources: 1CNBC, 2Fortune, 3IPSOS Affluent Survey USA Doublebase 2020; Base = HHI $125K+ Hight Net Worth Individual: U.S. adults with investable assets of at least $1 million, excluding personal assets and property Ultra-High Net Worth Individuals: U.S. adults with investable assets of at least $30 million, excluding personal assets and property 2 TEB SERVES AN ELITE AUDIENCE OF PRIVATE TRAVELERS Private Jet Travelers within the New York City DMA: 211% 291% 322% 197% MORE LIKELY TO HAVE MORE LIKELY TO HAVE MORE LIKELY TO HAVE A MORE LIKELY TO HAVE A BUSINESS HOUSEHOLD HOUSEHOLD C-SUITE DECISION INCOME TOTAL NET LEVEL POWER $3M+ WORTH JOB TITLE $5M+ $10M+ How Private Jet Travelers within the New York City DMA Have Flown in the Past 12 Months: Not Mutually Exclusive 56% 53% 20% BUSINESS CHARTER SERVICE / OWN FRACTIONAL IN THE PAST 12 JET CARD SHARES / PRIVATE JET MONTHS IN THE PAST 12 IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS MONTHS South Terminal Source: IPSOS Affluent Survey USA Doublebase 2020; Base = HHI $125K+, 3 TETERBORO (TEB) Teterboro Airport is a general aviation reliever airport located in affluent Bergen County, New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • JFK International Airport the New Terminal One
    JFK International Airport The New Terminal One M/WLBE Information Session November 10, 2020 THE NEW TERMINAL ONE JFK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Our World-Class Team Airline Sponsors Financial Sponsors Operating Partner Project Management Office NAMC National named The New Terminal One the 2020 Development Team of the Year THE NEW TERMINAL ONE JFK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2 Commitment to Diversity Diversity efforts start with The New Terminal One’s Leadership: • Dr. Gerrard P. Bushell, Executive Chair of The New Terminal One and Chair of Carlyle Airport Group Holdings, is a leader with experience in government, labor and the private sector. Dr. Bushell served as the President and CEO of the Dormitory Authority of the State of NY (DASNY) where he deployed more than $38 billion of capital and financing and managed a construction portfolio valued at over $6 billion in construction projects all while advancing the State’s M/WBE goals beyond 30% for DASNY. • JLC Infrastructure is a 30% equity partner. JLC Infrastructure is a leading investment firm with a strong track record and presence in NY and is a registered MBE with the PANYNJ. JLC’s participation since the inception of the project has helped to drive the commitment to fostering diversity. • McKissack & McKissack, the oldest woman and minority-owned design and construction firm in the US, is leading the Project Management Office. Cheryl McKissack Daniel, its President and CEO, is actively engaged with The New Terminal One as an advisor. McKissack has a formidable track record of delivering projects that meet and often exceed MWBE goals. Its portfolio of projects includes: World Trade Center, Columbia University, Metropolitan Transportation Authority (as Independent Engineering Consultant for 8 years), Philadelphia International Airport and LaGuardia Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT Laguardia Airport Central Terminal Building Redevelopment
    PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT LaGuardia Airport Central Terminal Building Redevelopment Queens Borough New York City Prepared for Port Authority of New York & New Jersey Port Authority of NY & NJ 225 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10003 Prepared by Frank G. Mikolic, Principal Investigator John W. Lawrence, Principal Investigator Brian M. Albright, GIS Specialist/Field Director AECOM 516 East State St. Trenton, New Jersey 08609 June 2013 PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT LaGuardia Airport Central Terminal Building Redevelopment Queens Borough New York City Prepared for Port Authority of New York & New Jersey 225 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10003 Prepared by Frank G. Mikolic, Principal Investigator John W. Lawrence, Principal Investigator Brian M. Albright, GIS Specialist/Field Director AECOM 516 East State Street Trenton, NJ 08609 June 2013 Management Summary SHPO PROJECT REVIEW NUMBER: 12PR05127 INVOLVED STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES: FAA Port Authority of New York and New Jersey PHASE OF SURVEY: IA, Literature Search and Sensitivity Assessment LOCATION INFORMATION: Location: New York City Minor Civil Division: Queens Borough County: Queens County SURVEY AREA: Length: 1.2 mi (2 km) Width: width varies depending on location Number of Acres Surveyed: 159 ac (64 ha) USGS 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE MAP: Central Park, Flushing SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT: Prehistoric (high, medium, low): Sensitivity Area 1 (Moderate to High), 2 (High), 3 (Low) and 4 (Moderate). Historic (high, medium, low): Sensitivity Area 1 (Moderate to High), 2 (Low),
    [Show full text]
  • Life and Times of Dinner
    Life & Times of Dinner Key Gateway to the Americas: The story of modern Miami is intertwined with visions of the city's potential as a link to places far away. Once upon a time, Miami itself was a place far away. One wag said: "If you own both Miami and Hell, live in Hell, and rent out Miami." But not everyone was as inclined to dismiss the place. Industrialist Henry Flagler, a Standard Oil partner of John D. Rockefeller's, saw potential in Aviation Cadets at Dinner Key (Courtesy: History Miami) connecting Southern Florida with points north, south, and east. He pushed his Florida East Coast Railroad down the Florida peninsula just before the turn of the 20th century. The first train entered Miami on April 13, 1896 - the tangible beginning of transportation links that would fuel Miami's future. Fifteen years after the first train, Miami saw its first plane - a Wright Brothers' exposition flight in 1911. The next year, aviation pioneer Glenn Curtiss opened a flying school. Miami was an excellent location for aviation - plenty of nice weather, and not a mountain in sight. With the coming of World War I, a sandy bit of dry land in Biscayne Bay known as Dinner Key became a focal point for naval aviation. Miamians regarded the small island - or key in the local parlance - as a nice place for a picnic, hence the name. The US Navy thought it would be a great place for a Naval Air Station. With some dredging and engineering, the island was converted to a peninsula, with room for hangars, shops, barracks and other accouterments necessary to the job of training aviators and mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Traffic Report
    You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. 2007 AIRPORT TRAFFIC REPORT Kennedy • Newark Liberty • LaGuardia • Stewart Teterboro • Downtown Manhattan Heliport You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. MEMORANDUM AVIATION DEPARTMENT FROM: Susan Warner-Dooley DATE: September 18, 2008 SUBJECT: 2007 ANNUAL TRAFFIC REPORT Attached is the 2007 Annual Traffic report, which provides important statistics on air traffic at our regional aviation facilities compiled by the Industry Analysis and Forecasting Unit. While the aviation industry remains a dynamic and cyclical industry, 2007 represented a year of growth on many fronts. The number of airports within the PANYNJ Airports System grew with the addition of Stewart International Airport. These airports have continued to serve the growing regional air service demand with record levels of aircraft operations and passengers for the system as a whole. JFK achieved record levels of aircraft operations and passenger traffic and added 17 additional destinations. Newark achieved record levels of international passengers and added 8 additional destinations. Daily departures and destinations also continued to grow at LGA. Stewart reached record levels in passengers. REGION NY/ NJ REGIONAL PASSENGERS: 1960-2007 2001-2007 32% 80's growt h 90's Growt h 12 0 38% 36% 110 . 0 10 0 70's Growt h 92.8 40% 83.3 80 74.8 60's Growt h 68.2 134% 60 53.5 54 .1 37.4 38.2 40 16 . 0 20 0 The strength of 2007 notwithstanding, these record results could not portend the fact that the industry is now entering into one of its downward cycles like those which have punctuated the cycle of growth over the last 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Jul 1 9 1999 Rutcm
    Airport Access via Rail Transit: What Works and What Doesn't By Joshua Schank BA Urban Studies Columbia University New York, New York (1997) Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 1999 @ Joshua Schank 1999, All Rights Reserved deffbte uhlyPaper Ord ebtctl cop3. 0'C? th thesi Author Department of Urban Studies and Planning May 18, 1999 Certified by Professor Nigel H. M. Wilson Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Associate Professor Paul Smoke Chair, MCP Committee Department of Urban Studies and Planning MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUL 1 9 1999 RUTCM LIBRARIES Airport Access via Rail Transit: What Works and What Doesn't By Joshua Schank Submitted to the department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 20, 1999 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning Abstract: Despite their potential for providing efficient and reliable airport access, rail connections to U.S. airports have consistently had trouble attracting a significant percentage of airport passengers. This thesis attempts find out which characteristics of airport rail links most strongly influence mode share so that future rail link plans can be assessed. These findings are then applied to the current plans for an airport rail link in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The thesis begins by examining current airport rail links in the U.S. Detailed case studies are performed for the following airports: John F. Kennedy, Philadelphia, Boston Logan, Washington National, Chicago O'Hare, Chicago Midway, and San Jose.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Marine Air Terminal (Laguardia Airport- Terminal A) and Glendale
    Bus Timetable Effective Winter 2019 MTA Bus Company Q47 Local Service a Between Marine Air Terminal (LaGuardia Airport- Terminal A) and Glendale If you think your bus operator deserves an Apple Award — our special recognition for service, courtesy and professionalism — call 511 and give us the badge or bus number. Fares – MetroCard® is accepted for all MTA New York City trains (including Staten Island Railway - SIR), and, local, Limited-Stop and +SelectBusService buses (at MetroCard fare collection machines). Express buses only accept 7-Day Express Bus Plus MetroCard or Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard. All of our buses and +SelectBusService Coin Fare Collector machines accept exact fare in coins. Dollar bills, pennies, and half-dollar coins are not accepted. Free Transfers – Unlimited Ride Express Bus Plus MetroCard allows free transfers between express buses, local buses and subways, including SIR, while Unlimited Ride MetroCard permits free transfers to all but express buses. Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard allows one free transfer of equal or lesser value (between subway and local bus and local bus to local bus, etc.) if you complete your transfer within two hours of paying your full fare with the same MetroCard. If you transfer from a local bus or subway to an express bus you must pay an additional $3.75 from that same MetroCard. You may transfer free from an express bus, to a local bus, to the subway, or to another express bus if you use the same MetroCard. If you pay your local bus fare in coins, you can request a transfer good only on another local bus.
    [Show full text]
  • • the Activation of OMNY Readers at the Queensboro Plaza Station in Queens Marks the Completion of the Line and the Halfway Po
    The activation of OMNY readers at the Queensboro Plaza station in Queens marks the completion of the line and the halfway point in the MTA's effort to activate OMNY at all 472 subway stations in the system. OMNY installation remains set to be completed by the end of the year at all subway stations and on all MTA-operated buses. A list of all subway stations and bus routes where OMNY is currently in use is at this link: https://omny.info/system-rollout In March, the MTA announced OMNY had surpassed 10 million taps. In 2021, the MTA will introduce an OMNY card at retail locations throughout the New York region. Also in 2021, the MTA will begin to install new vending machines at locations throughout the system. OMNY readers accept contactless cards from companies such as Visa, Mastercard, American Express, and Discover, as well as digital wallets such as Apple Pay, Google Pay, Samsung Pay, and Fitbit Pay. Following the completion of OMNY installation at all subway turnstiles and on buses, the MTA will introduce all remaining fare options, including unlimited ride passes, reduced fares, student fares, and more. Only after OMNY is fully available everywhere MetroCard is today, expected in 2023, will the MTA say goodbye to the MetroCard. The MetroCard was first tested in the system in 1993, debuting to the larger public in January 1994. All turnstiles were MetroCard-enabled by May 1997 and all buses began accepting it by the end of 1995. Tokens were sold until April 2003 and acceptance was discontinued that May in subway stations and that December on buses.
    [Show full text]