DOCSLIB.ORG

Futron-Feasibility-Study-Of-A-Florida-Commercial-Spaceport-Sept-2005.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Futron-Feasibility-Study-Of-A-Florida-Commercial-Spaceport-Sept-2005.Pdf Feasibility Study of a Florida Commercial Spaceport Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................5 PART 1: FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS......................................................................9 SUMMARY ...................................................................................9 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................11 METHODOLOGY..........................................................................12 SPACEPORT MISSIONS AND VEHICLE TYPES......................................... 12 VEHICLE D EVELOPER INTERVIEWS ..................................................... 12 GOVERNMENT AND OTHER INTERVIEWS ............................................... 12 AWARENESS OF AND SUPPORT FOR A COMMERCIAL SPACEPORT..........13 C OMMERCIAL PERSPECTIVE.............................................................. 13 GOVERNMENT AND OTHER PERSPECTIVES ........................................... 15 INFRASTRUCTURE.......................................................................15 B ASIC R EQUIREMENTS..................................................................... 15 FIRST-TIER C OST ESTIMATES ........................................................... 22 ON-SITE CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................... 24 OFF-SITE CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................. 26 OBSTACLES ..............................................................................28 MISSION/VISION ............................................................................. 28 POLITICAL .................................................................................... 28 C OST ........................................................................................... 28 R EGULATORY ................................................................................ 29 MILESTONES..............................................................................29 B USINESS PLAN ............................................................................. 29 POLITICAL SUPPORT ....................................................................... 30 A DEQUATE FUNDING ....................................................................... 30 CONCLUSION.............................................................................30 PART 2: LAUNCH FORECAST .........................................................................33 SUMMARY .................................................................................33 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................34 METHODOLOGY..........................................................................35 SUBORBITAL M ARKETS .................................................................... 35 Feasibility Study of a Florida Commercial Spaceport C OMMERCIAL ORBITAL M ARKETS....................................................... 35 GOVERNMENT ORBITAL M ARKETS ...................................................... 36 A DDRESSABLE L AUNCHES ................................................................ 36 FORECAST RESULTS...................................................................37 COMPARISON WITH OPERATOR ESTIMATES .....................................38 CONCLUSION.............................................................................39 PART 3: ECONOMIC IMPACT...........................................................................41 SUMMARY .................................................................................41 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................42 METHODOLOGY..........................................................................42 SPACEPORT C ONSTRUCTION ............................................................. 44 SPACEPORT OPERATIONS ................................................................ 45 L AUNCH VEHICLE OPERATOR SPENDING ............................................. 46 L AUNCH VEHICLE OPERATOR SPENDING ............................................. 47 TOURISM, MANUFACTURING, AND SERVICES ........................................ 47 ECONOMIC IMPACT RESULTS ........................................................48 SPACEPORT C ONSTRUCTION ............................................................. 48 SPACEPORT OPERATIONS ................................................................ 49 TOURISM, MANUFACTURING, SERVICES .............................................. 51 COMPARISON WITH RELATED SPACEPORTS AND AIRPORTS ...............51 CONCLUSION.............................................................................53 C OST/BENEFIT C OMPARISON OF SPACEPORT CONFIGURATIONS ............... 53 D IVERGENT SPACEPORT B USINESS MODELS ........................................ 53 SPACEPORT F ACILITY USAGE FEE STRUCTURE..................................... 54 SPACEPORT B USINESS PLAN ............................................................ 54 SUBORBITAL L AUNCH V EHICLE M ANUFACTURING .................................. 55 CONCLUSION....................................................................................................57 APPENDIX A: VEHICLE DEVELOPER PROFILES ..........................................59 APPENDIX B: VEHICLE DEVELOPER INTERVIEW QUESTIONS ..................69 APPENDIX C: GOVERNMENT INTERVIEW QUESTIONS ...............................71 Feasibility Study of a Florida Commercial Spaceport LIST OF FIGURES Figure E1: Spaceport Development Cost Estimates, 2006 - 2008 (Combined vs. Split Site).......................... 2 Figure E2: Economic Impacts Generated by Spaceport Operations (2010) ................................................... 3 Figure E3: Economic Impacts Generated by Spaceport Operations (2015) ................................................... 3 Figure 1: Florida Spaceport Concept Alternatives........................................................................................... 9 Figure 2: Vehicle Developer Infrastructure Needs .........................................................................................10 Figure 3: Target Vehicles and Characteristics ...............................................................................................17 Figure 4: Vehicles Excluded from Analysis ....................................................................................................18 Figure 5: Typical Requirements for Suborbital Reusable Vehicles ................................................................19 Figure 6: Typical Requirements for Orbital Expendable Launch Vehicles .....................................................21 Figure 7: New Spaceport Infrastructure Cost Estimate ..................................................................................22 Figure 8: Additional Cost Considerations.......................................................................................................24 Figure 9: Potential Airport Sites for Spaceport...............................................................................................27 Figure 10: Suborbital Launch Forecast, 2006–2015 ......................................................................................33 Figure 11: Orbital Launch Forecast, 2006–2015............................................................................................34 Figure 12: Total Florida Addressable Launches, 2006–2015.........................................................................37 Figure 13: Robust Scenario for Florida Launches, 2006–2015......................................................................37 Figure 14: Constrained Scenario for Florida Launches, 2006–2015..............................................................38 Figure 15: Comparison of Developer Estimates and Forecast Scenarios for 2015 Launches .......................39 Figure 16: Economic Impacts of the Florida Commercial Spaceport (2015) ..................................................41 Figure 17: Economic Impacts for Construction of the Florida Commercial Spaceport (2006-2008)...............42 Figure 18: Florida Economic Impact Multipliers, RIMS II Model.....................................................................43 Figure 19: Spaceport Facility Usage Fees Employed in Spaceport Revenue Model .....................................45 Figure 20: Map of United States RLV Manufacturer Vehicle Development Headquarters .............................46 Figure 21: Economic Impact of Spaceport-related Construction, Cumulative 2006 – 2008 ...........................48 Figure 22: Spaceport Development Cost Estimates, 2006 - 2008 (Combined and Split Sites)......................49 Figure 23: Economic Impacts Generated by Spaceport Operations (2010)...................................................50 Figure 24: Economic Impacts Generated by Spaceport Operations (2015)...................................................50 Figure 25: Economic Impact of Tourism Spending, Suborbital Operations (2015).........................................51 Figure 26: Economic Impacts of Spaceports and Airports of Interest ............................................................52 Figure 27: Cost/Benefit Comparison of Spaceport Configurations.................................................................53 Feasibility Study of a Florida Commercial Spaceport Feasibility Study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Triggered Lightning Risk Assessment for Reusable Launch Vehicles at Four Regional Spaceports
    AEROSPACE REPORT NO. ATR-2010(5387)-1 Triggered Lightning Risk Assessment for Reusable Launch Vehicles at Four Regional Spaceports April 30, 2010 Richard L. Walterscheid1, Lynette J. Gelinas1, Glenn W. Law2, Grace S. Peng3, Robert W. Seibold2, Frederick S. Simmons4, Paul F. Zittel5 John C. Willett Consultant, Garrett Park, Maryland E. Philip Krider Institute of Atmospheric Physics University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 1Space Sciences Department, Physical Sciences Laboratories; 2Civil and Commercial Launch Systems, Space Launch Projects; 3Computer Systems Research Department, Computer Science and Technology Subdivision; 4Sensor Systems Subdivision, Electronics and Sensors Division; 5Remote Sensing Department, Physical Sciences Laboratories Prepared for: Volpe National Transportation Systems Center U.S. Department of Transportation Cambridge, Massachusetts Contract No. DTRT57-05-D-30103 Task 13A Authorized by: Space Launch Operations Public release is authorized. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense. Executive Services and Communications Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMP control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION.
    [Show full text]
  • WALLONIE ESPACE INFOS N 44 Mai-Juin 2009
    WALLONIE ESPACE INFOS n°84 janvier-février 2016 WALLONIE ESPACE INFOS n°84 janvier-février 2016 Coordonnées de l’association Wallonie Espace Wallonie Espace WSL, Liege Science Park, Rue des Chasseurs Ardennais, B-4301 Angleur-Liège, Belgique Tel. 32 (0)4 3729329 Skywin Aerospace Cluster of Wallonia Chemin du Stockoy, 3, B-1300 Wavre, Belgique Contact: Michel Stassart, e-mail: [email protected] Le présent bulletin d’infos en format pdf est disponible sur le site de Wallonie Espace (www.wallonie-espace.be), sur le portal de l’Euro Space Center/Belgium, sur le site du pôle Skywin (http://www.skywin.be). SOMMAIRE : Thèmes : articles Mentions Wallonie Espace Page Correctif - Actualité : Sentinel-1B lancé le 22 avril par Soyouz (avec ULg, Thales Alenia Space 2 OUFTI-1) – Agence spatiale interfédérale de Belgique – Vingt ans pour Belgium , Amos, VitroCiset Wallonie Espace – Une Ardéchoise, pilote de CSL Belgium, Gillam, SABCA, Samtech, Sonaca, Spacebel, Techspace Aero, UCL, ULB, ULg, CSL, Euro Space Center, Skywin 1. Politique spatiale/EU + ESA: La « première » 2016 du DG de l’ESA – 5 Tableaux Budgets ESA – Compte-rendu Conférence sur la stratégie spatiale européenne : qui mène la danse dans le couple ESA-Commission européenne ? – A l’heure du Space 4.0 – Intérêt du Grand-Duché pour les ressources dans l’espace – La Corée du Nord exclue de la communauté spatiale ? 2. Accès à l'espace/Arianespace : Interview exclusive d’Alain SABCA, Techspace Aero, Thales 17 Charmeau (Airbus Safran Launchers) – Enquête de la Commission Alenia Space Belgium sur la prise de contrôle d’Arianespace – Duel Arianespace-SpaceX : c’est Ariane 5 qui gagne ! – Débuts, cette année, des lanceurs chinois de nouvelle génération – Tableau mondial des nouveaux lanceurs en préparation (avec des révélations !) WEI n°84 2016-01 - 1 WALLONIE ESPACE INFOS n°84 janvier-février 2016 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf?Sfvrsn=920Eb2c6 6, (Accessed 16.08.18)
    69th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Bremen, Germany, 1-5 October 2018. Copyright ©2018 by Mr. Yaroslav Menshenin. Published by the IAF, with permission and released to the IAF to publish in all forms. IAC-18.D1.4A.8 Model-Based Concept Framework for Suborbital Human Spaceflight Missions Yaroslav Menshenina, Edward Crawleyb a Skoltech Space Center, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 3 Nobelya str., Moscow, Russia 121205, [email protected] b Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue 33- 409, Cambridge, MA, USA 02139, [email protected] Abstract Projects of the New Space economy such as SpaceShipTwo and New Shepard are on their way to shifting the paradigms in space tourism and transportation. Being privately financed, they are also changing the way in which highly complex and formerly government-financed systems are now being developed. Looking to the future, we can envision humanity moving to space, an opportunity that will be available to many more of us as a result of these new paradigms. One of the core issues we encounter when we start the development of complex systems such as the suborbital transportation and space tourism systems is: what are the concepts available and how can these concepts be represented using strictly defined ontology and model semantics? In this work we present a model-based concept framework that aims to address this issue. First a concept framework methodology is presented, after which we demonstrate its applicability to suborbital human spaceflight missions – SpaceShipTwo and New Shepard. The analytical conceptual difference between these concepts is demonstrated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Prototype System for Simulating the Risks of Sub-Orbital Space Flight for Commercial Aviation
    A Prototype System for Simulating the Risks of Sub-Orbital Space Flight for Commercial Aviation Marco Sarconi School of Computing Science Sir Alwyn Williams Building University of Glasgow G12 8QQ Level 4 Project — March 22, 2013 Abstract Over the coming years there is expected to be an increase in the number of sub-orbital space flights for various purposes such as space tourism and scientific research. It is therefore advisable to analyse the potential risks of sub-orbital space travel on commercial aviation. This report presents research into the risks of sub-orbital debris on commercial aviation as well as the development of a simulation system which integrates live flight data through Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast and meteorological data. It then uses a mathematical model to calculate a debris field for a given suborbital vehicle and displays a model of the potential impact on aircraft within the vicinity. Education Use Consent I hereby give my permission for this project to be shown to other University of Glasgow students and to be distributed in an electronic format. Please note that you are under no obligation to sign this declaration, but doing so would help future students. Name: Signature: i Acknowledgments I would like to thank Prof. Chris Johnson for his continued support and guidance throughout the year. I would also like to thank the participants who took part in the evaluation. ii Contents 1 Introduction and Background Research 1 1.1 Aims and Motivation . 1 1.2 Sub-Orbital Space Flight . 2 1.2.1 What is Sub-Orbital Space Flight .
    [Show full text]
  • Largest Usa Landowners
    WWW.LANDREPORT.COM | FALL 2010 The Land Report LARGEST USA LANDOWNERS THE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN LANDOWNER $15 H C N A R L L E B , N E D D LARGEST USA LANDOWNERS A P S C M T T A Y W SPECIAL REPORT , H C N A R L L E B : W O R M O T T O B K R A P O J E M R E V , G N I L L E B M A S , H C N A R L L E B : W O R R E T N E C E W O R N O T N E K SALE OF THE , E N I A R C CENTURY: C M Y H T A K JOHN MALONE BUYS , R E Z N NEW MEXICO’S I E M N 290,100-ACRE A M Y W BELL RANCH : W 2010 LAND REPORT 100 O R P O T LANDREPORT.COM PLUS: LABRADOR RETRIEVERS | BP OIL SPILL | LAND REPORT TOP TEN FALL 2010 | The LandReport 37 The Land Report 1 2 3 10 0 4 3 Brad Kelley 1.7 million acres Ted Turner CONSERVATION 2+ million acres ike many a VISIONARY self-made No.1 Lbillionaire, Brad Kelley shuns publicity. Shuns it so much, in fact, The nation’s that he’s become something of an largest enigma to many of his neighbors, landowner a presence made acquired one even larger by his absence. Kelley’s of Georgia’s enormous holdings SHUTTERSTOCK are spread across shrewd business finest quail Texas, New Mexico, acumen to guide plantations and Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Space India 2.0 Commerce, Policy, Security and Governance Perspectives
    Space India 2.0 Commerce, Policy, Security and Governance Perspectives Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan Narayan Prasad (Eds.) ISBN: 978-81-86818-28-2 Printed by: Mohit Enterprises © 2017 Observer Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from ORF. CONTENTS Foreword vii K Kasturirangan, former Chairman, ISRO Introduction xi Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan and Narayan Prasad I Space Commerce 1. Space 2.0 India: Leapfrogging Indian Space Commerce 1 Narayan Prasad 2. Traditional Space and NewSpace Industry in India: Current Outlook and Perspectives for the Future 11 Narayan Prasad 3. A Review of India’s Commercial Space Efforts 23 K R Sridhara Murthi 4. Exploring the Potential of Satellite Connectivity for Digital India 37 Neha Satak, Madhukara Putty, Prasad H L Bhat 5. Unlocking the Potential of Geospatial Data 51 Arup Dasgupta 6. Developing a Space Start-up Incubator to Build a NewSpace Ecosystem in India 71 Narayan Prasad 7. Electronic Propulsion & Launch Vehicles: Today and Beyond – An Indian Perspective 85 Rohan M Ganapathy, Arun Radhakrishnan and Yashas Karanam iv II Space Policy 8. Privatisation of Space in India and the Need for A Law 103 Kumar Abhijeet 9. SATCOM Policy: Bridging the Present and the Future 119 Ashok GV and Riddhi D’ Souza 10. A Review of India’s Geospatial Policy 141 Ranjana Kaul 11. Formation of PSLV Joint Venture: Legal Issues 151 Malay Adhikari 12. Exploring Space as an Instrument in India’s Foreign Policy & Diplomacy 165 Vidya Sagar Reddy III Space Security 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Präsentation Über Lastprojekt.De
    Dipl.-Ing. Mathias Herrmann Inhalt: Allgemein Über das Projekt 2 Projekt - Strategische Ausrichtung 3 Ausgangssituation Industrialisierung –Wellenmodell 4 Rohstoffbedarf – Wachstum 5 unerschlossene Rohstoffvorräte? 6 neue Startplätze und Neugründungen 7 Markt, Starts und verbrachte Nutzlast 8 Weltraumindustrie - Markt, Entwicklung 9 chemische Raketen - Nutzlastanteil 10 Juni 2021 Folie 1 Über das Projekt Dipl.-Ing. Mathias Herrmann ➔ PRIVATE INITIATIVE ZUR INGENIEURTECHNISCHEN _____ERARBEITUNG VON PATENTRECHTEN UND DEREN _____VERMARKTUNG IM BEREICH LUFT- UND RAUMFAHRT STAND I.Q 2021: • DYNAMISCHE ENTWICKLUNG IN PRIVATER RAUMFAHRT LASTPROJEKT.DE: • ZIEL: MEHR NUTZLASTANTEIL VON CHEMISCHEN ______RAKETEN BEI STARTS IN DEN ORBIT • PRAXISORIENTIERTE FORSCHUNG UND ENTWICKLUNG • 6 PROVISORISCHE PATENTE ANGEMELDET • ZIELGRUPPE: ZIVILE WELTRAUMWIRTSCHAFT, _HERSTELLER, ANBIETER VON RAKETENSTARTS • OFFEN FÜR INVESTOREN, PARTNER, SPONSOREN • II.Q 2021 INTENSIVE ERARBEITUNG WEITERER SCHRITTE ENDGÜLTIGE PATENTUNTERLAGEN FORTSCHREIBUNG UND ERGÄNZUNG Juni 2021 Lastprojekt – Allgemein Folie 2 Strategische Ausrichtung auf Triebwerke Dipl.-Ing. Mathias Herrmann ➔ im Mittelpunkt Antriebe um günstigere Materialien zu ermöglichen IST-Stand der Technik chem. Raketen 2021 Bedeutung des Antriebes: Nutzlast ca. 1-4% Δm LEO vereinfachend: Auswirkungen des Antriebes WERKSTOFFE TRIEBWERK Mit TREIBSTOFF _ca. 20x _höher als Anteil der Werkstoffe Hülle, Verkleidung… Triebwerk + Tanks usw. ca. 8% ca. 15% . von der Gesamtmasse einer Rakete bestehen Struktur RP1/ H2
    [Show full text]
  • Horses for Courses – Spaceport Types
    International Space Development Conference, ISDC 2005, Washington DC, May 19-22 2005 Horses for Courses – Spaceport Types Derek Webber Director, Spaceport Associates, Rockville, Maryland 20852,USA There are over 35 operational spaceports in the world today. Most of them are government owned and operated; some are now emerging which are non-Federally-owned. How do these different types of spaceport approach and appeal to the various markets? Can a single type of all-inclusive spaceport cater for the needs of all potential users? This paper provides an update on the status of spaceports today, explores some aspects of competitive advantage, and makes some comparisons and conclusions. There will be a particular focus on the requirements for public space travel. A case will be made that it is probably not a workable plan to attempt to cover all markets with a single spaceport. Instead, it will be important for the management team at a spaceport to focus on those sectors where they can bring decided competitive advantage to bear, and in this way contribute to an eventual segmentation of spaceport types; some markets will be best left to be developed at other spaceports. Each spaceport will concentrate on what it can do best – “horses for courses”. I. Introduction here will be vastly different requirements for the future public space travelers, and their families and friends, T than are normally available at the traditional launch sites built fifty years ago. Indeed, the creation of this emerging kind of facility, the commercial spaceport, is in some ways a very necessary part of the creation of the new space businesses that the twenty-first century offers.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Cowboys
    JULY 2007 Commercial Markets PUBLICATION 1823 A Reprint from Tierra Grande By Bryan Pope rmchair astronauts with a quarter of a million dollars to spare could soon be paying to go Awhere no men — well, very few men — have gone before. An emerging trend suggests that at least a few pri- vate corporations think there is money to be made in charging civilians a pretty penny for a brief trip to the edge of the earth’s atmosphere. If that sounds like science fiction, think again. Privately funded spaceports flew under most people’s radar until one of the world’s most phenomenally successful businessmen brought them into the mainstream last year, in the most unlikely of places. All Systems Go instead of in Washington. In fact, our economic development corporation is seeking funding to construct a 20-unit apart- lusive Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos raised eyebrows ment complex.” when he snatched up the 165,000-acre Corn Ranch near Blue Origin may be the most high-profile project in the EVan Horn in Culberson County in 2004. But it wasn’t works, but it’s not the only one. About 18 miles southwest until later, when he announced plans to use the land — mostly of Fort Stockton in Pecos County, a project is under develop- desert — to build a private spaceport project that the entrepre- ment by the Pecos County/West Texas Spaceport Development neur really grabbed headlines. Corporation. Through Blue Origin, Bezos plans to develop New Shepard, According to a report released earlier this year by the FAA, a vertical-takeoff, vertical-landing vehicle capable of carrying a the West Texas Spaceport (also known as Las Escaleras a las small number of astronauts on suborbital, ballistic trajectories Estrellas, or the Stairs to the Stars) has access to more than as high as 325,000 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • “Horses for Courses” Paper
    “Horses for Courses” paper: a 2008 Addendum 30th September, 2008 Derek Webber Spaceport Associates, 5909 Rolston Road, Bethesda, MD 2 1. INTRODUCTION The paper “Horses for Courses- Spaceport Types”, by Derek Webber, was presented at the International Space Development Conference, ISDC 2005, in Washington DC in May 2005. The paper contained some useful tabulations of world and US spaceport data, which have been accessed since that time by numerous analysts. However, some of this data is now 3 years out of date, and requests have been received for an update of the key data tables to reflect changes that have occurred since the initial publication. The author has chosen to issue these updates as a simple addendum rather than to re-issue the original full paper, because the arguments in that original paper remain valid, and it continues to be accessible via the home page of the web-site www.SpaceportAssociates.com. Therefore, this addendum contains only the updated versions of Tables 1, 2 and 4 from the original paper, retaining the numbering of the original paper, but adjusting the attributions to the present date. 2. MAIN SUBSTANCE OF CHANGES Note from the headings that the tables contain data on US and non-US spaceports, and between planned and operational spaceports. Tables 1 and 2 contain both operational and planned spaceport data; Table 4 refers only to operational spaceports. All three tables reflect changes that have happened during the last 3 years. For Table 1, which focuses on US operational and planned spaceports, the main difference is a reflection of the fact that the FAA-AST has now awarded a spaceport license to Oklahoma Spaceport, and it therefore moves its category on the table.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coastwatcher Publication of the Thames River Composite Squadron Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol
    The flight left Carswell AFB, Texas on 26 March, Missions for America 1949 and returned 94 hours and 1 minute later. Four aerial refuelings were needed and the British Semper vigilans! developed gravity fed looped hose system carried Semper volans! by Boeing B-29M aircraft. The Coastwatcher Publication of the Thames River Composite Squadron Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol 300 Tower Rd., Groton, CT http://ct075.org . Nose of Lucky Lady II bearing the insignia of the Lt Col Stephen Rocketto, Editor 43rd Bomb Group and the names of the round-the- [email protected] world crew. Lt Col John deAndrade, Publisher Some Other Lucky Ladies C/CMSgt Michael Hollingsworth, Cadet Reporter Lt David Meers & Maj Roy Bourque, Papparazis Lucky Lady I was a B-29 that attempted a round- Hap Rocketto, Feature Editor the-world trip in 1948. Vol. IX Issue 9.41 03 November, 2015 Lucky Lady III was one of three B-52s which circumnavigated the globe in 1957. Erratum and Addendum And the Bone Lt Col Carl Stidsen, CTWG Historian and Director (External) of Aerospace Education states that the The fastest unofficial time around the world by an Boeing B-50A Superfortress which made the first air breathing aircraft may be held by two North non-stop circumnavigation of the world was the American Rockwell B-1Bs, named Hellion and Lucky Lady II, not the Lady Luck II. He is right. Global Power, which in 1995 made the trip in 36hr 13min. carrying out three practice bombing runs along the way. Lt Col John deAndrade, TRCS Squadron Commander and a Bone pilot recalls crewing Hellion at one point in his career and may have also flown Global Power.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment for the Blue Origin West Texas Commercial Launch Site
    Commercial Space Transportation Final Environmental Assessment for the Blue Origin West Texas Commercial Launch Site Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation August, 2006 HQ-030906.INDD This page intentionally left blank. Blue Origin West Texas Commercial Launch Site Environmental Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Blue Origin, LLC (Blue Origin) is a commercial venture that proposes to construct and operate a privately-owned space launch site in Culberson County, Texas. In accordance with the Commercial Space Launch Act, the Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) is responsible for regulating certain aspects of the construction and operation of the proposed launch facility by, among other things, issuing required permits or licenses. This environmental assessment has been prepared to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act regarding AST’s decision on issuing such permits and licenses. Proposed Action The proposed action is for AST to issue one or more experimental permits and/or licenses to Blue Origin. Blue Origin proposes to launch reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) on suborbital, ballistic trajectories to altitudes in excess of 99,060 meters (325,000 feet). To conduct these operations, Blue Origin would construct a private launch site, which would include a vehicle processing facility, launch complex, vehicle landing and recovery area, space flight participant training facility, and other minor support facilities. Candidate launch sites included two privately-owned parcels in Culberson County, Texas, the proposed state-sponsored Southwest Regional Spaceport in Upham, New Mexico, and the Pecos County Aerospace Development Corporation-sponsored Pecos County West Texas Spaceport at Fort Stockton, Texas. Blue Origin subsequently elected to conduct a more detailed analysis of the Culberson County sites.
    [Show full text]