Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; V2V Communications
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
3854 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Regardless of how you submit your A. V2V Communications Proposal comments, you should mention the Overview National Highway Traffic Safety docket number of this document. You B. Proposed V2V Mandate for New Light Administration Vehicles, and Performance Requirements may call the Docket Management for Aftermarket for Existing Vehicles Facility at 202–366–9826. C. V2V Communication Devices That 49 CFR Part 571 Instructions: Direct your comments to Would Be Subject to FMVSS No. 150 Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0126. See the 1. Original Equipment (OE) Devices on [Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0126] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section on New Motor Vehicles 2. Aftermarket Devices RIN 2127–AL55 ‘‘Public Participation’’ for more information about submitting written D. Potential Future Actions Federal Motor Vehicle Safety comments. 1. Potential Future Safety Application Mandate Standards; V2V Communications Docket: All documents in the dockets 2. Continued Technology Monitoring are listed in the http:// E. Performance Criteria for Wireless V2V AGENCY: National Highway Traffic www.regulations.gov index. Although Communication Safety Administration (NHTSA), listed in the index, some information is 1. Proposed Transmission Requirements Department of Transportation (DOT). not publicly available, e.g., confidential 2. Proposed V2V Basic Safety Message ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking business information (CBI) or other (BSM) Content (NPRM). information whose disclosure is 3. Message Signing and Authentication 4. Misbehavior Reporting restricted by statute. Publicly available 5. Proposed Malfunction Indication SUMMARY: This document proposes to docket materials are available either establish a new Federal Motor Vehicle Requirements electronically in regulations.gov or in 6. Software and Security Certificate Safety Standard (FMVSS), No. 150, to hard copy at DOT’s Docket Management Updates mandate vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) Facility, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 7. Cybersecurity communications for new light vehicles West Building, Ground Floor, Rm. W12– IV. Public Acceptance, Privacy and Security and to standardize the message and 140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket A. Importance of Public Acceptance To format of V2V transmissions. This will Management Facility is open between 9 Establishing the V2V System create an information environment in B. Elements That Can Affect Public a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday Acceptance in the V2V Context which vehicle and device manufacturers through Friday, except Federal can create and implement applications 1. False Positives Holidays. 2. Privacy to improve safety, mobility, and the 3. Hacking (Cybersecurity) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: environment. Without a mandate to For 4. Health require and standardize V2V technical issues, Mr. Gregory Powell, 5. Research Conducted on Consumer communications, the agency believes Office of Rulemaking, NHTSA, 1200 Acceptance Issues that manufacturers will not be able to New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 6. User Flexibilities for Participation in move forward in an efficient way and DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 366–5206; System that a critical mass of equipped vehicles Fax: (202) 493–2990; email: C. Consumer Privacy would take many years to develop, if [email protected]. For legal issues, 1. NHTSA’s PIA 2. Privacy by Design and Data Privacy ever. Implementation of the new Ms. Rebecca Yoon, Office of the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Protections standard will enable vehicle 3. Data Access, Data Use and Privacy manufacturers to develop safety Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. 4. V2V Privacy Statement applications that employ V2V Telephone: (202) 366–2992; email: 5. Consumer Education communications as an input, two of [email protected]. 6. Congressional/Other Government Action D. Summary of PIA which are estimated to prevent SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: hundreds of thousands of crashes and 1. What is a PIA? prevent over one thousand fatalities Table of Contents 2. PIA Scope 3. Non-V2V Methods of Tracking annually. I. Executive Summary 4. V2V Data Flows/Transactions With II. Background DATES: Comments must be received on Privacy Relevance A. The Safety Need or before April 12, 2017. 5. Privacy-Mitigating Controls 1. Overall Crash Population That V2V 6. Potential Privacy Issues by Transaction ADDRESSES: You may submit comments Could Help Address Type to the docket number identified in the 2. Pre-Crash Scenarios Potentially E. Health Effects heading of this document by any of the Addressed by V2V Communications 1. Overview following methods: B. Ways To Address the Safety Need 2. Wireless Devices and Health and Safety • Online: Go to http:// 1. Radar and Camera Based Systems Concerns www.regulations.gov and follow the 2. Communication-Based Systems 3. Exposure Limits 3. Fusion of Vehicle-Resident and 4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Smart online instructions for submitting Communication-Based Systems comments. Grid Implementation • 4. Automated Systems 5. Federal Agency Oversight & Mail: Docket Management Facility, C. V2V Research Up Until This Point Responsibilities M–30, U.S. Department of 1. General Discussion 6. EHS in the U.S. and Abroad Transportation, West Building, Ground 2. Main Topic Areas in Readiness Report 7. Conclusion Floor, Rm. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 3. Research Conducted Between the V. Device Authorization Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Readiness Report and This Proposal A. Approaches to Security Credentialing • Hand Delivery or Courier: West D. V2V International and Harmonization B. Federated Security Credential Building, Ground Floor, Rm. W12–140, Efforts Management (SCMS) E. V2V ANPRM 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 1. Overview 1. Summary of the ANPRM 2. Technical Design 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday 2. Comments to the ANPRM 3. Independent Evaluation of SCMS through Friday, except Federal F. SCMS RFI Technical Design Holidays. III. Proposal To Regulate V2V 4. SCMS RFI Comments and Agency • Fax: (202) 493–2251. Communications Responses VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:49 Jan 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12JAP2.SGM 12JAP2 srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Proposed Rules 3855 5. SCMS ANPRM Comments and Agency B. Regulatory Flexibility Act additional information, such as path Response C. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) predictions and driver actions (braking, 6. SCMS Industry Governance D. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice steering) not available from traditional C. Vehicle Based Security System (VBSS) Reform) sensors. This information can be used D. Multiple Root Authority Credential E. Protection of Children From Management Environmental Health and Safety Risks by receiving vehicles to more reliably VI. What is the agency’s legal authority to F. Paperwork Reduction Act predict potential collision events as well regulate V2V devices, and how is this G. National Technology Transfer and as reduce false warnings. This ability to proposal consistent with that authority? Advancement Act communicate certain information that A. What can NHTSA regulate under the H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act cannot be acquired by vehicle-resident Vehicle Safety Act? I. National Environmental Policy Act onboard sensors makes V2V particularly B. What does the Vehicle Safety Act allow J. Plain Language good at preventing impending and require of NHTSA in issuing a new K. Regulatory Identifier Number (RIN) intersection crashes, such as when a FMVSS, and how is the proposal L. Privacy Act vehicle is attempting to make a left turn consistent with those requirements? Proposed Regulatory Text 1. ‘‘Performance-Oriented’’ from one road to another. V2V also 2. Standards ‘‘Meeting the Need for Motor I. Executive Summary offers an operational range of 300 meters Vehicle Safety’’ The National Highway Traffic Safety or farther between vehicles, nearly 3. ‘‘Objective’’ Standards Administration (NHTSA) is proposing double the detection distance afforded 4. ‘‘Practicable’’ Standards by some current and near-term vehicle- C. How are the regulatory alternatives to issue a new Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 150, to resident systems. These unique consistent with our Safety Act authority? characteristics allow V2V-equipped D. What else needs to happen in order for require all new light vehicles to be a V2V system to be successful? capable of Vehicle-to-Vehicle (‘‘V2V’’) vehicles to perceive and warn drivers of 1. SCMS communications, such that they will some threats sooner than vehicle- 2. Liability send and receive Basic Safety Messages resident sensors can. Furthermore, VII. Estimated Costs and Benefits to and from other vehicles. The proposal while the operational status or accuracy A. General Approach to Costs and Benefits contains V2V communication of vehicle-resident sensors may be Estimates performance requirements predicated affected by weather, sunlight, shadows, B. Quantified Costs on the use of on-board dedicated short- or cleanliness, V2V technology does not 1. Component Costs share these same system limitations. 2. Communication Costs range radio communication (DSRC) 3. Fuel Economy Impact devices to transmit Basic Safety As another source of information 4. Overall Annual Costs Messages (BSM) about a vehicle’s speed, about the driving environment, 5. Overall Model Year (MY) Costs heading, brake status, and other vehicle